ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Agricultural and Food Economics
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1613616
Integrating Structured and Unstructured Data for Livestock Price Forecasting: A Sustainability Study from South Korea
Provisionally accepted- 1AIICON LLC, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Accurate forecasting of food prices is important for market regulation and long-term sustainability of the livestock industry. However, traditional forecasting methods often fail to consider unexpected external factors, such as disease outbreaks and natural disasters. Social media and online news have emerged as valuable sources for capturing these influences, but existing studies have primarily relied on short textual data, such as headlines or social media posts, which may lack depth and contextual richness. To address these challenges, we propose the Sentiment Analysis and Seasonal Decomposition (SASD) framework, a novel approach to enhance livestock price forecasting by integrating sentiment analysis of news data with seasonal decomposition of historical price trends. SASD framework, which systematically decomposes complex livestock price time series into trend, seasonal, and residual components, improving the forecasting accuracy by isolating seasonal patterns and irregular fluctuations. Additionally, we develop a Korean-language sentiment lexicon using an improved Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency (ITF-IDF) algorithm, enabling morpheme-level sentiment analysis for better sentiment extraction in Korean contexts. Furthermore, an attention-based Long Short-Term Memory (AM-LSTM) model enhances forecasting accuracy by prioritizing important sentiment shifts caused by unexpected external factors. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed framework, pork price and news data was collected between 2018 and 2021. The dataset comprises 14,588 news articles and corresponding price data across 874 days. Data from 2018 to 2020 were used for training, while data from 2021 served as the test set. For sentiment analysis, the ITF-IDF approach achieved F1-scores of 0.74 and 0.79 for negative and positive sentiment classifications, respectively. In terms of price prediction, the proposed AM-LSTM model outperformed traditional statistical methods, as well as machine learning and deep learning baselines, achieving improvements in MAE ranging from 43.0% to 87.4%. Furthermore, the SASD framework significantly reduced MAE in both short- and long-term predictions, by approximately 41.8%, 60.7%, 62.6%, and 71.7% for 1-day, 7-day, 15-day, and 30-day forecasts, respectively. These results demonstrate that the SASD framework can be effectively implemented for livestock market analysis and has potential applicability beyond pork, including markets for lamb, beef, chicken, and other animal products.
Keywords: livestock price prediction, deep learning, Improved TF-IDF, sentiment analysis, attention mechanism LSTM
Received: 17 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Chuluunsaikhan, Choi and Nasridinov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jong-Hyeok Choi, AIICON LLC, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Aziz Nasridinov, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.