ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets
Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1613806
This article is part of the Research TopicFood Systems for Nutrition: Converging Economic, Social, and Environmental SustainabilityView all 12 articles
Is camel milk protein suitable for infants? Understanding mothers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- 2Department of Statistics, College of Business and Economics, United Arab Emirates University, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- 3College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Camel milk, with its resemblance to human milk and therapeutic properties, has potential as a substitute/complementary food for infants. To commercialize camel milk and its products specifically for infants, this research was imperative to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices among mothers about the acceptance of camel milk and its products for babies (0-2 years old) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Using convenience sampling, a bilingual structured questionnaire with Cronbach-alpha-tested reliability of 0.865 was completed by 502 mothers, both UAE Nationals and expatriates. Results showed an inadequate awareness about exclusive breastfeeding, with only 54.7% aware of its correct duration. However, most participants (59.8%) did not know if it was suitable for use in babies, and 76.1% were not aware of any health benefits associated with its use in babies. Based on a five-point Likert scale (from 0-4), mean score exceeding neutral score of 2 indicated mothers' positive attitudes towards camel milk and its products: culturally acceptable (2.77) and acceptable to their babies (3.09).Moreover, the current practice of using camel milk as an alternative to human milk was not reported in those mothers who did not breastfeed their babies. Furthermore, mothers' employment, lower birth order of the babies, mothers' knowledge about the camel milk use for babies, its use in complementary foods, and associated health benefits emerged as factors significantly influencing their decision to use camel milk, its infant formula, and products in complementary feeds for the 0-2 years old babies. Overall, promoting camel milk and its products as a sustainable nutritional alternative for 0-2 years old babies necessitates a multifaceted approach that includes raising awareness and fostering a positive attitude among mothers to support its acceptance. Future research should systematically explore consumer demand, maternal perceptions, and safety considerations, with a focus on establishing evidence-based guidelines for the appropriate use of camel milk products in early childhood nutrition.
Keywords: Camel milk, pediatric, Complementary food, Infant Formula, Milk allergy
Received: 17 Apr 2025; Accepted: 17 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Padayachee, Safi, Kittana, Al Derei, Kajajah, Aldhanhani, Alrashedi, Mudgil, Maqsood and ATTLEE. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: AMITA ATTLEE, Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.