Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1638523

This article is part of the Research TopicFuture Paths for Local and Alternative Food SystemsView all 9 articles

The role of fairs with local products as co-creation initiatives for community development. Case study: the "Iașul în Bucate" food event, Romania

Provisionally accepted
Simona-  Roxana UlmanSimona- Roxana Ulman1Cristina  CautisanuCristina Cautisanu1LUCIAN  TANASALUCIAN TANASA2*Meda  GaleaMeda Galea2Ioan Sebastian  BrumaIoan Sebastian Bruma2Simona Beatrice  ManolacheSimona Beatrice Manolache3Silvius  STANCIUSilvius STANCIU3*
  • 1CERNESIM Environmental Research Center, Department of Exact Sciences and Natural Sciences, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Iași, Romania, IASI, Romania
  • 2Academia Romana Filiala Iasi, Iași, Romania
  • 3Universitatea Dunarea de Jos din Galati, Galați, Romania

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The food events can be one useful tool for gastronomic tourism for supporting the achievement of its main aims. In such a context, the practical organizational necessity of knowledge on the perspectives of visitors and vendors, especially in the case of an event based on participatory governance in which all the voices should be heard, is addressed in this study. It concentrates on a food event that supports locally produced food and is organized in a collaborative approach. The primary objectives of this exploratory descriptive case study are (i) to emphasize the main organizational particularities of the ”Iașul în Bucate” food event, with a focus on its co-creation approach, (ii) to analyse the profiles of visitors and producers participating here, and (iii) to comparatively study their main arguments for participation to the event. For this, a mixed approach to data collection was applied, combining the strengths of two survey tools: a quantitative and a qualitative one. Accordingly, 146 questionnaires were completed and validated in the period between July 2022 and September 2023 across the 7 editions of the fair, while, in the case of producers, the data was collected through interviews administered at the level of 34 vendors that were present at the same editions. The study revealed the common arguments for participation, but also the differences among both perspectives of visitors and vendors, which can represent paths for passing from adaptive learning to generating and transforming learning into organizing events. The findings respond to the identified gaps from the literature regarding (i) the lack of focus on small-scale events in a European context, (ii) the inadequate integration of the co-creation approach in the organization, without proper documentation; (iii) the insufficient concentration on the seller, with a higher attention given to the visitors.

Keywords: food event, visitors, local producers, profiles, arguments for participation, comparative analysis

Received: 30 May 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ulman, Cautisanu, TANASA, Galea, Bruma, Manolache and STANCIU. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
LUCIAN TANASA, lucian.tanasa@gmail.com
Silvius STANCIU, sstanciu@ugal.ro

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.