Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Agroecology and Ecosystem Services

Volume 9 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1651686

This article is part of the Research TopicBiodiversity in Agriculture: Enhancing Ecosystem Services and Sustainable FarmingView all 17 articles

Long-term regenerative practices enhance in-field biodiversity and soil health for sustainable crop yields

Provisionally accepted
Cathy  HawesCathy Hawes*Andrew  ChristieAndrew ChristieGill  BanksGill BanksDavid  BoldrinDavid BoldrinJacqui  BrandtJacqui BrandtPietro  Paolo Michele IannettaPietro Paolo Michele IannettaIsabella  SwystIsabella SwystIzzy  TurnerIzzy Turner
  • The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Agricultural intensification has resulted in arable systems dominated by monocultures that are reliant on agrochemical inputs and frequent tillage to maintain high crop yields. This has caused significant decline in farmland biodiversity and soil health, further increasing the need for chemical inputs to regulate system processes. Regenerative practices aim to reverse this trend and capitalise on biodiversity-driven ecosystem functions that determine the long-term sustainability of agricultural production. However, despite a general acceptance of the potential benefits of this approach, there is currently very little supporting evidence from long-term, field scale experimental data. A whole-systems and nature-based approach for designing and implementing a regenerative cropping system at the Hutton's Centre for Sustainable Cropping long-term platform has demonstrated the practical application of theoretical, outcomes-and biodiversity-based frameworks in a commercially realistic setting. Best practice management options were combined in a cropping system that, rather than conserving soil and biodiversity at the expense of crop production, aimed to maintain yields with less reliance on agrochemical inputs by simultaneously promoting soil health, crop fitness and biodiversity. Soil physical properties and biological processes were enhanced, plant diversity and the abundance of beneficial plant and invertebrate species were increased, and crop yield was maintained at levels comparable to the national average. A barrier to uptake of low input, regenerative practices is the perception of risk. Data-driven evidence for the positive and negative impacts of regenerative approaches on crop production and the environment is needed for farmers to make informed management decisions. Particularly important is an understanding of the balance between short-term costs and longer-term benefits as the system gradually stabilises and starts to deliver increased resilience to future environmental perturbation. This highlights the need for long-term, whole-system and field-scale studies to provide commercially realistic predictions of risks, costs and benefits for growers wishing to adopt regenerative cropping practices.

Keywords: functional diversity, Regenerative agriculture, agroecological networks, Biodiversity, Integrated cropping, Whole System Design

Received: 22 Jun 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hawes, Christie, Banks, Boldrin, Brandt, Iannetta, Swyst and Turner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Cathy Hawes, cathy.hawes@hutton.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.