ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security
Community-based versus commercial feedlots: A systematic review of their roles in promoting sustainable and climate-resilient livestock production in Southern Africa
Provisionally accepted
- 1Risk and Vulnerability Science Center, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa
- 2Centre for Global Change, Universty of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa, Alice, South Africa
- 3Economic Analysis Unit, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Livestock production systems in Southern Africa face mounting challenges from climate change, land degradation, and feed scarcity, threatening both productivity and rural livelihoods. This systematic review compares community-based feedlots (CBFs) and commercial feedlots to evaluate their respective contributions to sustainable and climate-resilient livestock production. A total of 42 peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2024 across eight Southern African countries were analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. The synthesis examines differences in productivity performance, environmental outcomes, socioeconomic benefits, and institutional resilience. Results indicate that commercial feedlots outperform CBFs in technical efficiency, achieving higher average daily gains (1.2–1.6 kg/day), superior feed conversion ratios (5.0–6.0 kg feed DM/kg weight gain), and faster market turnover. Conversely, CBFs demonstrate greater social inclusivity, local adaptability, and resilience to climatic stress, particularly in drought-prone communal areas. They promote community participation, create rural employment, empower women and youth, and reduce grazing pressure on communal rangelands during dry seasons. Both systems, however, face sustainability trade-offs: commercial feedlots are associated with higher greenhouse gas emissions and concentrated waste, while CBFs struggle with nutrient overloads and limited waste management capacity. Common constraints affecting both models include fluctuating feed costs, inadequate market access, weak infrastructure, and insufficient extension support. The review concludes that, combining the technical efficiency of commercial operations with the inclusivity and adaptive capacity of CBFs, represents a viable pathway toward climate-smart, sustainable, and socially equitable livestock systems in Southern Africa.
Keywords: Cattle productivity, Climate Change, community feeding kraals, Enteric methane, Livestock waste management, social equity
Received: 06 Aug 2025; Accepted: 02 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Slayi and Zantsi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mhlangabezi Slayi
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.