ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Toxicol.
Sec. Occupational Toxicology
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1589380
Occupational exposure and its mechanistic link to allergic asthma and lung function decline; a data-driven approach coupled to mining of adverse outcome pathway signatures
Provisionally accepted- 1Risk Analysis For Products In Development, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, Netherlands
- 2KU Leuven, Environment and Health, Leuven, Belgium
- 3Aarhus University, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Within occupational epidemiology, the establishment of associations between chemical exposures and health outcome, in particular of individual chemicals present in the exposome, is difficult. Epidemiological studies are valuable but may be prone to confounders, or lack detailed exposure characterisation. Rodent studies may suffer from interspecies differences in comparison to humans. Here, we explore if a data driven approach can leverage human relevant mechanistic information to inform presumed associations between chemical exposures and two common respiratory disorders: lung function decline (LFD) and allergic asthma (AA). Using public toxicogenomics datasets, we identified Gene Ontology Bioprocesses (GO BPs) enriched in human respiratory cells, exposed in vitro to either diesel ultrafine particles (UFP) or respiratory sensitisers. In addition, for LFD and AA, GO BPs were curated from Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) and Key Events (KEs) extracted from the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Wiki, and DisGeNET, a gene-disease database. Considering the commonality in GO BPs, a clear overlap was observed between GO BPs derived from UFP and LFD (a.o. "negative -"/"positive" regulation of cell activation", "positive regulation of ion transport", "stem cell proliferation"). 20 GO BPs were overlapping between sensitisers in combination with AA (e.g. "responses to xenobiotic stimulus", "response to oxidative stress" and "regulation of response to cytokine stimulus"). For AA, sensitiser concentrations used in in vitro were generally higher compared to equivalent concentrations expected in vivo (from PBK modelling). Yet, the overlapping GO BPs discovered for these endpoints were plausible and aided in providing mechanistic insights. Currently, limitations exist in the approach to infer causality (e.g. data availability, coverage of AOPs, in vitro to in vivo dosimetry issues), however it can inform on the identification of chemicals within the occupational exposome and putative mechanistic linkage with occupational diseases. Finally, the annotated MIEs and KEs for LFD and AA may serve as valuable resource for further AOP developments.
Keywords: Sensitisers, ultrafine particles, In vitro cells, toxicogenomics, AOP, Dosimetry, Asthma, lung function decline
Received: 07 Mar 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Stierum, Ghosh, Meijerink, Pinho, Schlunssen, Pronk and Van Bilsen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rob Stierum, Risk Analysis For Products In Development, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, 96800, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.