ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Toxicol.
Sec. Environmental Toxicology
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1696913
This article is part of the Research TopicNew methods and approaches in toxicology of emerging environmental contaminantsView all 5 articles
Montmorillonite-Based Essential Oil Carrier and its Effects on Non-Target Species: An Environmental Perspective on its risk assessment
Provisionally accepted- 1Universidade do Porto GreenUPorto Centro de Investigacao em Producao Agroalimentar Sustentavel, Vairão, Portugal
- 2Chemistry Research Centre (CIQUP) & Institute of Molecular Sciences (IMS), Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Porto, Portugal
- 3Universidade do Minho Centro de Engenharia Biologica, Braga, Portugal
- 4Universidade do Minho Labbels, Braga, Portugal
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Essential oils (EO), rich in bioactive metabolites with biocidal activity, present great potential for agricultural applications as new biopesticides. However, their high volatility and sensitivity to environmental conditions limits their application. To address these limitations, nanotechnology-based formulations have been developed, incorporating EO into natural clays such as montmorillonite (MMT). Due to its colloidal properties, high adsorption capacity, and modifiable surface, MMT serves as an effective carrier for stabilizing EO while controlling their release. Besides aiming to enhance EO efficacy, these MMT-based formulations also aim to minimize EO toxicity to non-target organisms. In this study, the toxicity of Satureja montana EO (SM EO), of its dispersant agent Tween 20, of the MMT nanoclay and of the nanoclay-EO formulation was evaluated using aquatic (Aliivibrio fischeri, Raphidocelis subcapitata, Lemna minor and Daphnia magna), and terrestrial (Folsomia candida and soil microbiota) non-target model organisms, following standard protocols. Among the tested species, R. subcapitata and D. magna, exhibited the highest sensitivity, with D. magna showing an EC50 of 0.011 mg mL-1 and a complete growth inhibition being observed for R. subcapitata at concentrations ≥ 0.021 mg mL-1, for the nanoclay-EO formulation. F. candida reproduction was also significantly reduced for all tested concentrations of the nanoclay-EO formulation. In contrast, it was observed a stimulatory effect on soil microbial activity particularly for dehydrogenase and acid phosphatase enzymes. These findings suggest that the nanoclay-EO formulation did not reduce the toxicity of SM EO, and in some cases, may even raise ecotoxicological concerns, particularly for aquatic and soil invertebrates. This study highlights the importance of detailed ecotoxicological evaluations of biopesticide formulations based on plant-based and materials as essential oils, and other natural materials, as they cannot be assumed as safe compounds. To the best of our knowledge ecotoxicological data is limited for most of the EO including some that already in the market. Based on these results, the concentrations to be tested for efficacy against target organism (safe to non-target organism) should be lower than 0.007 mg mL-1.
Keywords: Satureja montana, Nanoclay, Biopesticides, Ecotoxicology, non-target organisms
Received: 01 Sep 2025; Accepted: 14 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Machado, Ganilho, Andreani, Sousa, Ribeiro and Pereira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ruth Pereira, ruth.pereira@fc.up.pt
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.