Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer represents a significant advancement in the field of colorectal surgery, addressing one of the most challenging pathologies faced by surgeons today. The complexity of rectal cancer treatment lies in the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach to select the optimal treatment strategy amidst an expanding array of options. Traditional treatment protocols, which often include neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy followed by surgery, can lead to substantial functional impairments affecting digestive, urinary, and sexual health, thereby impacting the patient's quality of life. Moreover, the surgeon's expertise and the quality of the surgical procedure remain critical prognostic factors, particularly concerning local recurrence rates. The overarching challenge is to minimize perioperative complications, such as anastomotic leaks and the need for permanent stomas. Recent advancements in minimally invasive techniques, including conventional laparoscopy, robotics, and transanal dissection of the rectum (TATME), as well as local resection surgeries like TEM, TEO, and TAMIS, offer promising alternatives. These techniques, often combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies, are being explored to enhance oncological, postoperative, and functional outcomes, yet there remains a need for further investigation to optimize these approaches.
This Research Topic aims to explore the intricate nature of rectal cancer treatment, focusing on the decision-making complexities and the potential for various treatment schemes. It seeks to evaluate the different minimally invasive surgical approaches and their impact on oncological, postoperative, and functional outcomes. The research will address key questions such as the efficacy of different minimally invasive techniques, the criteria for selecting appropriate candidates for non-radical treatments, and the integration of these techniques with adjunctive therapies. By examining these aspects, the research aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.
To gather further insights into the complexities and advancements in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer, we welcome articles addressing, but not limited to, the following themes: - Comparative studies of minimally invasive techniques versus traditional surgical methods. - Long-term oncological and functional outcomes of minimally invasive procedures. - Criteria for patient selection for non-radical treatment approaches. - Integration of minimally invasive surgery with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. - Innovations in robotic and transanal surgical techniques. - Strategies to minimize perioperative complications and improve quality of life. - Multidisciplinary approaches to treatment planning and decision-making.
We welcome Original Research, Reviews, Systematic Reviews and Mini-Reviews.
Please note: Case Reports are not accepted for this topic. Additionally, manuscripts consisting solely of bioinformatics or computational analysis of public genomic or transcriptomic databases which are not accompanied by validation (independent cohort or biological validation in vitro or in vivo) are out of scope for this section and will not be accepted as part of this Research Topic.
Article types and fees
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Case Report
Clinical Trial
Curriculum, Instruction, and Pedagogy
Editorial
FAIR² Data
FAIR² DATA Direct Submission
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.
Article types
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.