Three Decades of Pain Disparities Research: Charting a Course Toward Equity in Geriatric Pain Management

  • 35

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission deadlines

  1. Manuscript Summary Submission Deadline 1 January 2026 | Manuscript Submission Deadline 21 April 2026

  2. This Research Topic is currently accepting articles.

Background

Over the past thirty years, research on pain disparities has revealed critical and enduring inequities in the assessment, treatment, and outcomes of pain— inequities that disproportionately burden diverse and historically marginalized populations. This thematic issue seeks to trace the historical evolution of this field—focusing on older adults—as a means of identifying the systemic, structural, and methodological barriers that have sustained disparities. In doing so, this issue aims not only to deepen our understanding of the roots of inequity but also to chart a more just, inclusive, and equitable path forward.
This special issue aims to contextualize both the progress and the limitations that have characterized how pain is examined and research among older adults. Early research established the presence of disparities; subsequent work explored mechanisms and interventions. However, because pain is not a singular syndrome or type of pain, we must begin to view and theorize chronic pain from a layered lens, accounting for intersectionality, lifespan variability, and social acceptability. A historical analysis of this framework allows for a critical appraisal of past approaches and provides a foundation for developing a “fourth generation” of research—one that focuses on patient empowerment and liberation, precision medicine, and interventions/program dissemination from a strengths-based approach. Through this historical and future-oriented lens, the issue seeks to challenge established paradigms and constructions of pain and foster a new generation of pain disparities research—one that advances equity and justice in the lives of older adults and redefines excellence in geriatric pain management, while addressing new areas that forgo only describing the issue but identifying positive tangible solutions.
This issue invites contributions that address the following key goals:
- Map the Evolution of Pain Disparities Research: Analyze the trajectory of the field through the lens of the “three generations” (i.e., identification/documentation/description, explanation, solutions) and propose a pragmatic roadmap for a “fourth generation” focused on patient liberation, empowerment, and collaborative engagement.
- Intra-group variability (within group): Highlight the diverse experiences and outcomes that exist among individuals of the same “identity”, reflecting the influence of intersecting factors such as race, age, gender, and sex. An intersectionality framework is essential to understanding how these overlapping identities shape health, behavior, and lived experience, rather than treating any group as monolithic. The counters prior many studies of prior years that highlight differences between groups, which often underscores that one group does not fare as well when compared to other groups.
- Identify Drivers of Disparities Across the Life Course and Health Span: Examine the structural, clinical, and methodological contributors to disparities, including early- and mid-life exposures, social determinants of health, and the intersection with geriatric syndromes.
- Advance Measurement and Mechanistic Understanding: Promote innovations in pain phenotyping, assessment methods (particularly for populations with cognitive impairment), and elucidation of mechanisms underlying psychosocial and behavioral approaches to pain management.
- Highlight Scalable and Equitable Models of Care: Showcase care models, implementation strategies, educational interventions, and economic approaches that improve access, adherence, and health outcomes among diverse older populations.
- Promote Inclusive and Impactful Research Designs: Emphasize the development and application of emerging technologies, inclusive trial methodologies, and translational research approaches that reduce bias and enhance real-world impact from bench to bedside to community.
- Redefine the Traditional Conceptualization of Pain: Propose new ways of theorizing and operationalizing pain theories and social constructions of pain that capture the diversity of lived experiences across identity and the intersection of epigenetics.

Research Topic Research topic image

Article types and fees

This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:

  • Brief Research Report
  • Case Report
  • Clinical Trial
  • Data Report
  • Editorial
  • General Commentary
  • Hypothesis and Theory
  • Methods
  • Mini Review

Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.

Keywords: Pain disparities, Geriatric pain, Health equity, Social determinants of health, Life-course perspective

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the main journal or any other participating journal.

Impact

  • 35Topic views
View impact