Skip to main content

Raising the bar: Advancing therapeutic strategies for fighting communicable and noncommunicable diseases

Cover image for Research Topic "Raising the bar: Advancing therapeutic strategies for fighting communicable and noncommunicable diseases"
49kviews
Editorial17 September 2024
Editorial: Raising the bar: advancing therapeutic strategies for fighting communicable and noncommunicable diseases

Humankind is constantly plagued with invisible yet devastating pathogens. Just a mere 4 years ago, the world came to a standstill as SARS-CoV-2 grew rampant and disrupted every aspect of society. Similarly, other pathogens discussed in this Research Topic can bring about equally detrimental effects should it be left undetected and untreated. Consequently, various authors have presented their findings on how this can be mitigated, one step at a time.

Various researchers have presented findings on pathogens that cause communicable diseases such as the group B streptococcal (GBS) presented by Liu and Ai. Liu and Ai described various factors that allow GBS to circumvent the immune system, such as antibiotic resistance, as well as virulence factors that are common across different bacteria. GBS infection in obstetrics and gynecology highlights its significance as a cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality (1). For women with pre-labor rupture of membranes at term who are GBS-colonized, induction of labor is associated with reduced rates of neonatal infection compared to expectant management (2). These advancements aim to refine prevention strategies and potentially decrease antibiotic use in the future.

Drug-resistant pathogens have been an increasingly concerning public health threat. Yu et al. described the potential side effects of using bedaquiline, which disrupts the mycobacterium adenosine triphosphate synthase (3), as a treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients. Usage of bedaquiline has been limited due to its adverse association with QTc prolongation, an irregular cardiovascular phenomenon (4, 5). In their research, Yu et al. employed metabolomic analysis on the urine specimens of QTc-prolonged and QTc un-prolonged patients to uncover differences in various biomarkers between the two groups. Eventually, they concluded that two lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE) molecules were the most ideal biomarkers with the highest sensitivity and specificity. Their discovery not only potentially allows a more pervasive use of bedaquiline, but also highlights the ease of detecting vital biomarkers through less-invasive methods.

Urine samples may also be used as a variable to improve current drug dosing regimens. Residual diuresis from patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may promote drug elimination, consequently affecting the efficacy of drugs administered using the standard dosage, such as vancomycin. Yet, aggressive dosing regimens, frequent monitoring, and individualized approaches based on population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models are recommended for patients receiving CRRT (6). Yu et al. therefore proposed a PopPK model to guide vancomycin dosing in CRRT patients, incorporating residual diuresis as a factor. They performed the first multicenter retrospective study, measuring daily urine volume as a variable, highlighting the importance of individualized dosing of antibiotics in different patients.

With the progressive use of combinatorial therapies against many pathogens, drug-drug interactions gradually becomes a challenge. In their research, Jacobsson et al. determined the pharmacodynamics of first-in-class zoliflodacin and doxycycline combinatorial therapy against gonorrhea and chlamydia coinfections. Using a dynamic in-vitro hollow-fiber interaction model (HFIM), Jacobsson et al. observed high efficacy in the combinatorial therapy on Neisseria gonorrhoeae compared to a previous static in-vitro study (7) and zoliflodacin monotherapy. Zoliflodacin also showed abilities to suppress the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant mutants. Combination therapy with doxycycline proved effective in HFIM, eradicating N. gonorrhoeae strains at 3 g zoliflodacin doses without resistance emergence.

On the viral front, the COVID-19 pandemic made therapeutics discovery against viruses even more relevant. Among the earliest drugs given emergency approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration was Paxlovid (8). Qiu et al. revisited the usage of this drug and focused on drug administration beyond 5 days after the onset of symptoms. Their findings concluded that for administration beyond 5 days, Paxlovid has proven to be safe and effective in reducing viral load, without any additional adverse effects. Similarly, treatments like tocilizumab and baricitinib have both been used for treating COVID-19-triggered hyperinflammatory response. However, their safety and efficacy profiles have not been discussed. Zhang et al. performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab and baricitinib in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Both drugs showed similar efficacy in reducing 28-day mortality and hospital length of stay. However, baricitinib demonstrated a more favorable safety profile, with significantly lower rates of secondary infections, thrombotic events, bleeding events, and acute liver injury as compared to tocilizumab, making baricitinib a more attractive option for treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Given that it is a constant race against time with these rapidly evolving viruses, the ability to repurpose existing drugs is crucial. Li et al. assessed the chemopreventive effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) against COVID-19, relating to infection risk factors, symptoms, and recovery in outpatients with UDCA exposure. UDCA is an endogenous bile acid commonly used to treat various hepatobiliary diseases (9) but it has also been shown to downregulate the ACE2 receptor used by SARS-CoV-2 for entry (10). In their study, the UDCA-administered group demonstrated a lower infection rate as compared to their non-administered counterpart, while at the same time, mitigating the severity of the symptoms without any additional severe adverse effects.

Another therapeutic, lentinan, was found to exhibit antiviral and immunomodulatory effects. Administering lentinan, a β-glucan, as a nasal drop, Fan et al. evaluated its safety and efficacy as a COVID-19 treatment by performing a phase 1 dose-climbing study followed by a phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled study. The authors demonstrated that lentinan nasal drops were well-tolerated, reducing virus clearance and shedding time despite no significant difference in ameliorating symptoms. With lentinan being able to trigger the production of neutralizing antibodies, this treatment paves the way for the production of mucosal vaccines to generate mucosal immune responses against respiratory pathogens.

The advancement of new therapeutics to combat these elusive pathogens looks promising. However, the generalization of findings is currently limited by small cohort sizes and restricted geographical representation. Yet, the positive results should not be overlooked as it serves as a stepping stone for future discoveries. With the spotlight once again on the field of infectious diseases, it is only a matter of time before more prominent breakthroughs are achieved.

1,340 views

1 citations

Background: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) has received emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration owing to its effectiveness and safety. However, data on the effectiveness and safety of Paxlovid use in COVID-19 patients with onset of more than five days are lacking. Methods: A real-world retrospective study was performed during the outbreak involving the SARS-CoV-2 BA.5.2 subvariant. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients (including mild, moderate, severe and critical cases) were divided into three groups: Paxlovid treatment within (Group A) or more than (Group B) five days of COVID-19 onset and no Paxlovid treatment during more than five days of COVID-19 onset with only basic symptomatic treatment (Group C). Endpoints were all-cause 28-day mortality, improvement in clinical classification, and a composite endpoint of disease progression, viral load and virus elimination time. Safety was assessed by comparing adverse events reported during treatment in each group. Results: During the period, 248 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, including 55 in Group A, 170 in Group B, and 23 in Group C, were enrolled. There were no significant differences in the clinical classification improvement rate [80.0% (16/20) vs. 81.3% (52/64), p=1.000; 60.0% (21/35) vs. 55.7% (59/106), p=0.653, respectively] or all-cause 28-day mortality [0% (0/20) vs. 1.6% (1/64), p=1.000; 11.4% (4/35) vs. 6.6% (7/106), p=0.576, respectively] between Groups A and B for nonsevere and severe cases. However, the clinical classification improvement rate in Group B was markedly higher than that in Group C [81.3% (52/64) vs. 50.0% (6/12), p=0.049] among nonsevere cases. Cycle threshold values of the N and ORF genes in Group B were significantly increased after Paxlovid treatment [31.14 (IQR 26.81-33.93) vs. 38.14 (IQR 36.92-40.00), p<0.001; 31.33 (IQR 26.00-33.47) vs. 38.62 (IQR 35.62-40.00), p<0.001, respectively]. No significant differences in reported adverse events of neurological disease (p=0.571), liver injury (p=0.960) or kidney injury (p=0.193) between Group A and Group B were found. Conclusions: Paxlovid treatment within ten days of onset can shorten the disease course of COVID-19 by reducing the viral load. Paxlovid is effective and safe in treating COVID-19 with onset of more than five or even ten days when patients have a high viral load.

5,647 views

5 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
31 July 2024
Evaluating the protective effectiveness and risk factors of ursodeoxycholic acid on COVID-19 among outpatients
Di Li, 19 more and Peng Hu

3,455 views

2 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
29 December 2023
Population pharmacokinetics and individualized dosing of vancomycin for critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: the role of residual diuresis
Zhenwei Yu, 11 more and Yuhua Zhao
Population pharmacokinetics and individualized dosing of vancomycin for critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: the role of residual diuresis
Background: Vancomycin dosing is difficult in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Previous population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models seldom consider the effect of residual diuresis, a significant factor of elimination, and thus have poor external utility. This study aimed to build a PopPK model of vancomycin that incorporates daily urine volume to better describe the elimination of vancomycin in these patients.We performed a multicenter retrospective study that included critically ill patients who received intermittent intravenous vancomycin and CRRT. The PopPK model was developed using the NONMEM program. Goodness-of-fit plots and bootstrap analysis were employed to evaluate the final model. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to explore the optimal dosage regimen with a target area under the curve of ≥400 mg/L•h and 400-600 mg/L•h.Overall, 113 observations available from 71 patients were included in the PopPK model. The pharmacokinetics could be well illustrated by a one-compartment model with first-order elimination, with the 24-hour urine volume as a significant covariate of clearance. The final typical clearance was 1.05 L/h, and the mean volume of distribution was 69.0 L. For patients with anuria or oliguria, a maintenance dosage regimen of 750 mg q12h is recommended.Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients receiving CRRT were well described by the developed PopPK model, which incorporates 24-hour urine volume as a covariate. This study will help to better understand vancomycin elimination and benefit precision dosing in these patients.

4,910 views

13 citations

1,987 views

1 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
1 December 2023
Safety and efficacy of lentinan nasal drops in patients infected with the variant of COVID-19: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Wenhan Fan, 11 more and Xuesong Liang

2,827 views

7 citations

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab and baricitinib among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
22 November 2023
Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab and baricitinib among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jin Zhang, 6 more and Dong Liu
Introduction:Tocilizumab and baricitinib are recommended treatment options for COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammatory response; however, there is a lack of systematic review directly evaluating their efficacy and safety.Objective:This review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab and baricitinib in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.Methods: Relevant databases were searched for studies that compared the effect or safety of baricitinib or tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The mortality was the main outcome. The hospital length of stay or adverse drug reactions were taken into consideration as secondary endpoints. The analyses were performed in Revman 5.3 or Stata 16.0. The protocol and analysis plan were pre-registered in PROSPERO, with the registration number CRD42023408219.In total, 10 studies with 2517 patients were included. The overall pooled data demonstrated that, there was no statistically significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate and the hospital length of stay between the tocilizumab and baricitinib (OR= 1.10, 95% CI= 0.80-1.51, P =0.57; OR=-0.68, 95% CI= -2.24-0.87, P= 0.39). The adverse reactions including secondary infection rate, thrombotic and bleeding events, and acute liver injury of tocilizumab were significantly higher than that of baricitinib.

3,624 views

10 citations