Emerging Fluorescent Molecular Tracers to Guide Intra-Operative Surgical Decision-Making

Abstract

Fluorescence imaging is an emerging technology that can provide real-time information about the operating field during cancer surgery. Non-specific fluorescent agents, used for the assessment of blood flow and sentinel lymph node detection, have so far dominated this field. However, over the last decade, several clinical studies have demonstrated the great potential of targeted fluorescent tracers to visualize tumor lesions in a more specific way. This has led to an exponential growth in the development of novel molecular fluorescent contrast agents. In this review, the design of fluorescent molecular tracers will be discussed, with particular attention for agents and approaches that are of interest for clinical translation.

Introduction

Surgery, in combination with or without chemo and/or radiotherapy, remains the most recommended treatment with curative intent for many localized tumors. In these types of surgeries, the primary goal is to attain complete removal of all cancerous tissue and obtain negative tumor resection margins. By minimizing the risk of leaving cancer cells behind, chances of recurrence are diminished and overall survival is improved (Javidfar et al., 2016; Orosco et al., 2018; Tringale et al., 2018).

As visual inspection through the surgeon's eyes (open surgeries) or through color video (laparoscopic interventions) is often insufficient, a technique for the detection of occult tumor lesions, accurate and real-time definition of tumor margins, and assessment of the presence of locoregional LN metastases is warranted. Such a technique would be a major step forward in preventing over- and under- treatment, and personalizing the surgical treatment of many cancer patients (Hentzen et al., 2018).

A recent trend is the usage of fluorescence imaging during surgery, which is a real-time, sensitive, contact-free, relatively cheap, and non-ionizing technique that can easily be implemented within the surgical routine. Fluorescence imaging can provide anatomical, functional, or molecular information after administration of a fluorescent contrast agent, either through direct real-time imaging of the surgical field, or by intra-operative optical specimen mapping (Nagaya et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017b).

The application of fluorophores emitting in the near-infrared (NIR) region of the light spectrum is favored as they enable detection of signals up to several millimeters of depth under the tissue surface (Weissleder and Ntziachristos, 2003; Kovar et al., 2007). Indocyanine green (ICG) and methylene blue (MB) are the only two NIR fluorescent dyes approved by the FDA, although the poor fluorescent properties of MB limit its use as fluorescent contrast agent (van Manen et al., 2018). ICG is a non-targeted hydrophobic dye that, once injected intravenously, aggregates to plasma proteins and is eliminated via the hepatobiliary route. Clinically-approved applications of ICG are determining cardiac output and hepatic function, and ophthalmic angiography (Soons et al., 1991; Iijima et al., 1997; Stanga et al., 2003). A broader range of applications has since been investigated, going from the use of ICG in reconstructive surgery for assessment of tissue perfusion (Holm, 2010), to sentinel lymph node mapping (Aoun et al., 2017; Chand et al., 2018), ureter visualization (Siddighi et al., 2014), and in some cases, tumor imaging (Van Der Vorst et al., 2013; Liberale et al., 2017; Nakaseko et al., 2018). ICG tumor uptake is reliant on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, which, while effective in mouse models, has seen only limited applicability in the human situation due to differences in tumor growth and development (Nichols and Bae, 2014; Danhier, 2016), and has been demonstrated to lead to false-positive results for image-guided surgery (Tummers et al., 2015).

As fluorescent dyes by themselves generally lack tumor specificity, molecular targeted fluorescent agents have been introduced. Targeted tracers consist of a fluorophore chemically conjugated to a targeting moiety, the latter possessing binding affinity for a specific cancer-associated molecular target or biomarker. Targeted tracers that are always fluorescent, are referred to as “always-on” targeted tracers. In this review the different parameters to the design of these tracers will be discussed, from the level of target selection, to the choice of targeting moiety, fluorophore, and conjugation strategy. Alternatively, probes can be designed around mechanisms that cause fluorescence to be quenched until activation. This can be used for the development of “activatable” or “smart” fluorescent probes. An overview of the different types of activatable tracers will also be provided.

Molecular-Targeted Fluorescent Tracers

Conjugatable NIR Fluorophores

In fluorescence image-guided surgery (FIGS) research and practice, fluorophores operating in the NIR region are most often used, because of superior imaging characteristics compared to light in the visible spectrum. More specifically, the lower background and improved tissue penetration -a consequence of diminished scattering, endogenous fluorophore absorption and autofluorescence- makes NIR light more suited (Weissleder and Ntziachristos, 2003; Kovar et al., 2007). The NIR domain applicable for in vivo optical imaging can actually be separated in two distinct areas: the NIR-I (650–900 nm) and NIR-II window (1,000–1,700 nm).

The NIR-I Window

In the NIR-I region, a wide choice of fluorophores is available for conjugation. Appropriate fluorophores should be (photo)stable in vitro and in vivo, be soluble in aqueous environments, and their extinction coefficient and quantum yield should be as high as possible to maximize brightness. For the labeling of proteins and small molecule ligands for FIGS, cyanine-based fluorescent dyes are by far the most widely investigated (Figure 1A). Cyanine dyes typically consist of two heterocyclic nitrogen-containing rings connected by a polymethine bridge. Extension of the polymethine bridge to penta- and heptamethines, red-shifts the absorption and emission of the dyes (Yi et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2017b). In comparison to ICG, the most commonly used cyanine dyes have been rendered less hydrophobic by the inclusion of several charged groups such as sulfonic acids (e.g., sulfo-Cy5, sulfo-Cy7) in their structure resulting in less non-specific protein interactions in vivo (Mujumdar et al., 1993). In the synthesis of heptamethine dyes, it has been found that the length of the polymethine chain has a negative effect on the chemical stability, as well as the photochemical properties of the dye. This has resulted in the integration of a central cyclohexenyl ring into the structure, which improves stability and fluorescence quantum yield through the increased rigidity of the molecular structure (Tarazi et al., 1998).

Figure 1

IRDye800CW (Figure 1A) is the most applied dye for the design of targeted FIGS tracers. IRDye800CW is primarily cleared via the kidneys when intravenously injected, with some liver uptake, though much less than for ICG (Marshall et al., 2010). An alternative development was that of the zwitterionic dye ZW800-1 (Figure 1A). Due to balanced surface charges on its structure, this fluorophore interacts very little with serum proteins, and is almost exclusively cleared by the kidneys (Choi et al., 2011). However, the ether linkage on the meso carbon at the core of this dye has been found to be unstable in vivo, leading to a decrease of the fluorescent signal over time. This issue was resolved by replacing this ether linkage with a carbon-carbon bond (Hyun et al., 2014). Yet, this modification comes at the cost of increased formation of H-dimers, which are caused by stacking of the fluorophores (Ogawa et al., 2009). Both IRDye800CW and ZW800-1 have, due to their renal clearance, also been proposed for ureter imaging (Choi et al., 2011; Korb et al., 2015).

Other cyanine dyes that have been investigated (pre)clinically for FIGS include the pentamethine dyes BM104, Dy676, IRdye650, IRDye680RD, and Alexa Fluor 680 (AF680), and the heptamethine dyes FNIR-Z-759, Xenolight 770CF, S0456, LS288, and ZWCC. Even ICG is sometimes used as a conjugatable fluorophore in always-on targeted tracers (Juhl et al., 2016), though it is most often incorporated in activatable targeted tracers, as aggregation of the dye to the structure of the targeting moiety will cause quenching, until the tracer is metabolized (Kobayashi et al., 2016). It is possible to use NIR dyes based on other backbones, such as BODIPYs, squaraines, rhodamines and porphyrins, however, these are not often used for FIGS, given their either excessive hydrophobicity or poor photochemical properties (Zhang et al., 2017b). The spectral properties of the chosen dye are however interdependent with the excitation light source and emission collection specifications of the camera system used during imaging.

The NIR-II Window

Imaging in the NIR-II window has further advantages related to autofluorescence and scattering compared to the NIR-I window, though absorption by water is slightly higher at these wavelengths. NIR-II imaging, however, is difficult due to low quantum yields, poor water solubility and general lack of availability of biocompatible fluorophores (Hong et al., 2017). Only recently, Antaris et al. described the synthesis of the biocompatible and renally cleared NIR-II organic fluorophore CH1055 (Figure 1A) and its use for targeted tumor imaging after conjugation with an anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) affibody-molecule (Antaris et al., 2016). This field may gain more traction in the near future (Jin, 2019).

Hybrid Nuclear and Fluorescent Labels

While the use of NIR fluorescent dyes has led to increased signal-to-background ratios and better overall depth penetration up to several millimeter in tissue, deeper lying, and hidden lesions would still be missed. To this end, the combination of NIR fluorescence and nuclear techniques in a single tracer may be attractive. The nuclear component can be used for pre-operative imaging, as well as for intra-operative guidance using a gamma-detecting probe (coarse navigation), at which point, fluorescence would provide high resolution visual guidance for precise resection (Van Leeuwen et al., 2016). Integration of both modalities onto a tracer can occur in several ways. Conjugation of the fluorophore and chelator for radioactive labeling at different positions is one option, either through co- or sequential incubation of the targeting ligand with the chosen fluorophore and chelator (Lütje et al., 2014b). Several preclinical hybrid single photon emission tomography (SPECT)/fluorescent tracers combining IRDye800CW and ¹¹¹In have been prepared in this manner, including the antibodies BIWA against CD44v6 (Odenthal et al., 2018) (Figure 3A), MN-14 and Labetuzumab against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (Rijpkema et al., 2014; Hekman et al., 2017), and D2B against prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (Lütje et al., 2014a). This technique has also been applied clinically, with the carbonic anhydrase 9 (CAIX) specific antibody Girentuximab (Hekman et al., 2016, 2018). The same manner of conjugation was used to prepare preclinical positron emission tomography (PET)/NIR tracers by labeling the anti-CD146 antibody YY146 with IRDye800CW and ⁸⁹Zr (Hernandez et al., 2016), the anti-prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) minibody A11cMb with a Cy5.5 dye and ⁸⁹Zr/¹²⁴I (Tsai et al., 2018), or the anti-prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) diabody A2cDb with IRDye800CW and ¹²⁴I (Zettlitz et al., 2018).

In another integration strategy, the fluorophore and the radiolabel can be combined into a single structure. This is advantageous since a more homogenous tracer is obtained, whose biodistribution can be accurately determined via radioactivity. Furthermore, this is often the only possibility when working with small peptides or molecules, as multiple attachment points may not be available. However, such structures are more complex to design, as opposed to the more straightforward separate labeling procedure. A urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) specific antibody, called ATN-658, was conjugated with both ZW800-1 and a chelator for ¹¹¹In labeling through a single structure called a “multifunctional single attachment point” (MSAP) that bore both labels (Boonstra et al., 2015c, 2017). The MSAP-strategy was also used to combine an ¹¹¹In/chelator complex and Cy5.5 fluorophore for conjugation to either an integrin binding RGD peptide or the anti-TZ14011 peptide targeting chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) (Kuil et al., 2011; Buckle et al., 2013). Additional dual labeling structures have been explored, for example, the construction of a dual-modality linker combining Cy5 and ¹⁸F on the diabody A2cDb (Zettlitz et al., 2019), or for the preparation of a CH1055-⁶⁸Ga-RGD tracer (Sun et al., 2018), ⁶⁸Ga-IRDye650/IRDye800CW conjugated bombesin antagonists (Zhang et al., 2017a; Li et al., 2018), or a Cy5-labeled anti-PSMA KuE peptide with a chelator for ⁶⁸Ga or ¹⁷⁷Lu labeling for PET or SPECT/targeted radionuclide therapy (TRNT), respectively (Schottelius et al., 2018).

Labeling Strategies

Fluorophores (and by extension, hybrid labels) can be linked to the targeting moiety using a range of different conjugation chemistries. As opposed to small molecules and peptides that are generally more tolerant toward harsher conditions such as the use of organic solvents and high temperatures, the conjugation of fluorophores to larger protein-based moieties is restricted to softer conditions. The most commonly applied strategy to this end is the formation of an amide bond between primary amines, and an activated carboxylic acid (often activated via a N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-ester, Figure 1B) (Toseland, 2013). While every polypeptide contains a primary amine at its N-terminus, this method is often applied for random conjugation on lysine residues. In larger protein structures, the abundancy of accessible lysines makes the degree of conjugation and the exact positioning of fluorophores difficult to control, resulting in a heterogenous tracer mixture. Furthermore, having many fluorophores per targeting ligand can lead to self-quenching effects (reduced brightness) and if the fluorophores are conjugated in or close to the antigen-binding region, they may negatively impact the binding capacities of the tracer (Debie et al., 2017). This can especially be a problem for smaller compounds, though it has been demonstrated that even the binding efficiency of full antibodies can be affected (Vira et al., 2010; Szabó et al., 2018).

Site-specific labeling methods resulting in homogenous tracer preparations in which the fluorophore is only attached to a specific, pre-determined location situated away from the antigen-interaction site, may offer a solution. The formation of a thio-ether bond between a sulfhydryl residue and a maleimide functionalized fluorophore is an often-employed strategy in FIGS (Figure 1C). To this end, a free cysteine residue is incorporated in the targeting moiety's structure at the location of predilection, such as the C- or N-terminus of protein scaffolds, peptides and small antibody fragments (Sun et al., 2005; Massa et al., 2014). Antibodies and larger fragments such as minibodies and diabodies can furthermore be partially reduced, freeing the sulfhydryl residues of more exposed disulfide bridges for conjugation (Olafsen et al., 2004; Sonn et al., 2016; Tsai et al., 2018; Zettlitz et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). Many other site-specific methods have gained popularity over the last years, such as the azide-alkyne cycloaddition-click chemistry (Li et al., 2014), enzymatic modification of peptide tags (e.g., transglutaminase-, sortase-, or intein-mediated conjugation) (Massa et al., 2016a), incorporation of unnatural amino acids for biorthogonal conjugation or the use of linking peptides such as the SPY/SPYcatcher method (Massa et al., 2016b; Alam et al., 2018). While these techniques are promising for the future development of FIGS tracers, to date, they have not yet been applied in clinical tracers, and have seen only limited development in preclinical FIGS research.

Impact of Fluorophore and Conjugation on the Tracer's Pharmacokinetics

Conjugation of a fluorescent dye to a targeting ligand can possibly alter the pharmacokinetics of the ligand. The physicochemical properties of the dye (e.g., hydrophilicity and global/local charge distributions), the degree of conjugation, as well as the chosen conjugation method all play a role in the general biodistribution of the FIGS tracer. It has been observed that after labeling with IRDye800CW, tracers most often exhibit more extensive non-specific targeting in vivo, including higher liver uptake. This is likely caused by the interaction of IRDye800CW with serum proteins. Further hepatic metabolization of the tracer can in addition be a source of intestinal background signal which could be contrast-limiting in abdominal applications (Choi et al., 2011, 2013; Debie et al., 2017). This is in accordance with findings for other heptamethine fluorophores, where a high number of negative charges on the fluorophore -as is the case for IRDye800CW- are seen to cause partial hepatobiliary clearance (Sato et al., 2016b) (Figure 2A). Other than merely causing increased background signals, interaction with serum proteins will furthermore cause a change in the imaging window of the tracer. While this effect is already observed for long-circulating antibodies (Sato et al., 2016b; Cilliers et al., 2017), the impact on smaller compounds that usually show fast pharmacokinetics and renal clearance can be considerably more pronounced, in some cases delaying the optimal imaging window from a few hours to up to a day or longer. Indeed, increased liver uptake and delayed optimal tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were observed for randomly IRDye800CW conjugated nanobodies (Figure 2B), scFv's, Fab fragments and diabodies (Yang et al., 2014; Boonstra et al., 2015b; Debie et al., 2017; El-Sayed et al., 2018; Boogerd et al., 2019). Interestingly, the gravity of this effect has been found to also be related to the used conjugation chemistry. For instance, we found that the pharmacokinetics of site-specifically IRDye800CW or IRDye680RD conjugated nanobodies normalized compared to randomly-conjugated nanobodies (Figure 2B). These nanobody-based tracers could be used for high contrast imaging as early as 1 h post-injection (Kijanka et al., 2016; Debie et al., 2017). Of note, while not directly compared to their randomly-conjugated analog, affibodies expressing a C-terminal cysteine and conjugated at this position with IRDye800CW also enabled imaging at the expected early timepoints (Sexton et al., 2013; de Souza et al., 2017; Ribeiro de Souza et al., 2018).

Figure 2

With the aim of optimizing the pharmacokinetic profile of tracers, the chemical design of fluorophores can be systematically modified. Variations in the overall charge, total number of charges and hydrophilicity of a Cy5 dye have led to a hybrid cRGD-tracer with improved properties regarding non-specific background signals, renal elimination, and tumor uptake (Bunschoten et al., 2016). A similar strategy was applied for the optimization of the cRGD peptide as well as a KUE anti-PSMA peptide, with heptamethine fluorophores. However, conclusions of such studies on the most optimal design of fluorophores for peptide conjugation are difficult to generalize as the obtained results are also highly dependent on the physicochemical properties of the peptide itself (Choi et al., 2013; Bao et al., 2017). It is therefore becoming evident, that selection of an appropriate fluorophore and labeling strategy is an essential part of the fluorescent tracer design. For protein-based ligands such as antibodies, antibody-fragments, and scaffold proteins general properties and guidelines concerning the conjugation of certain fluorophores can be established, whereas in small peptides and molecules optimization in the design of new conjugates may be required on an individual basis.

Targets for FIGS With Molecular-Targeted Tracers

In the current preclinical and clinical FIGS studies, a wide variety of biomarkers have been investigated as potential targets. Extracellular molecules enable targeting with non-cell penetrating ligands, and cell-membrane bound biomarkers are often preferred, as diffusion of secreted targets will reduce the sharpness of imaging. Biomarkers overexpressed by the cancer cells themselves are popular as they are already widely used for targeted therapeutic or nuclear imaging applications (Boonstra et al., 2016). Targets having shown high-level and quite general overexpression within specific cancer types include folate receptor α (FRα), which is mainly known for ovarian cancer (Kalli et al., 2008), CEA in colorectal and pancreatic cancer (van Oosten et al., 2011; de Geus et al., 2016), and PSMA in prostate cancer (Perner et al., 2007). One of the most highly overexpressed biomarkers is the breast cancer marker human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). While high contrast in HER2 overexpressing cells will likely be achieved, the fact that this marker is only overexpressed in a small subset of patients can be problematic in the sense that pre-operative screening would be required (Harbeck and Gnant, 2017). In order to generate more widely applicable FIGS tracers, the search for more general tumor markers is ongoing. Targets such as EGFR, carbonic anhydrase 9 (CAIX) and the epidermal cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) have been suggested and explored to this end (Boonstra et al., 2015a, 2016).

Another strategy lies in the targeting of the tumor stroma, instead of only the tumor cells. This has several distinct advantages, namely, stroma is present on the tumor periphery/invasive edge and is part of a general physiological process, implying the presence of cancer-type independent markers, such as markers associated with infiltration of angiogenesis, tumor associated immune cells, or fibroblasts (Boonstra et al., 2015a). Examples of potential stromal targets include the soluble, cell-released vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) as marker for angiogenesis or the fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP-α) for fibroblast targeting. Several markers also share stromal and tumor cell expression, and may as such be especially interesting. Examples are uPAR and integrins such as α_vβ₃ (Boonstra et al., 2015a; Hamidi and Ivaska, 2018). In all cases, constitutive expression in normal or fibrotic tissue could be a limiting factor as it will cause on-target, off-tumor uptake. Moreover, one should always take intra-tumoral heterogeneity into consideration (Pogue et al., 2018).

Targeting Ligands

As for targeting moieties, a host of possible types of molecules are available. These range from full IgG antibodies, to antibody fragments, scaffold proteins, peptides, and small molecules. A comprehensive overview of the different targeting ligands that have been investigated preclinically and clinically in the context of FIGS is given in Table 1.

Antibodies are large (150 kDa) proteins that bivalently attach to their molecular target with high affinity and specificity. The large size of antibodies, as well as the presence of an Fc-domain bestow a long blood half-life and limit tumor penetration. Indeed, as is known from nuclear molecular imaging, the use of antibodies as targeted fluorescent contrast agents for FIGS necessitates extended waiting periods of several days to obtain sufficient target-specific contrast (Freise and Wu, 2015). Antibody-based FIGS tracers represent the largest group of currently evaluated compounds as monoclonal antibodies against a wide variety of targets are readily available and can be straightforwardly repurposed following fluorophore conjugation. For example, the therapeutic EGFR targeting antibodies Cetuximab and Panitumumab, and the anti-VEGF-A antibody Bevacizumab have been, after labeling with IRDye800CW, broadly explored in the context of FIGS in a range of pathologies such as head and neck cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and glioblastoma (Heath et al., 2012; Day et al., 2013a,b; Gong et al., 2014; Korb et al., 2014; De Boer et al., 2015; Warram et al., 2015, 2016; Rosenthal et al., 2016, 2017; Moore et al., 2017; Gao et al., 2018a,b; Prince et al., 2018; Tummers et al., 2018b; van Keulen et al., 2019). Early phase clinical trials demonstrated the feasibility of intraoperative lesion detection and this was confirmed by histological evidence. The anti-CEA compound SGM-101, consisting of the novel antibody SGM-ch511 and the fluorophore BM104 (Figure 1A) (the NHS-activated version of BM104 is called BM105) is currently being evaluated in a phase III clinical trial for colorectal cancer. In addition, the potential of many more NIR-labeled antibodies (most often labeled with IRDye800CW) has been investigated in a variety of subcutaneous, orthotopic, and metastatic mouse models, including the anti-(human) EpCAM antibody 323/A3 (van Driel et al., 2016) or anti-uPAR antibody ATN-658 (Boonstra et al., 2017) for colorectal, head and neck, and/or breast cancer.

To achieve more rapid pharmacokinetics, antibody fragments, obtained through protein engineering, can be considered. Minibodies, consisting of two scFv-CH3 chains are, with 80 kDa, about half the size of full antibodies. Furthermore, they lack a functional Fc-region, preventing extended circulation due to FcRn recycling. A recent study demonstrated the use of an anti-(human) PSCA minibody, called A11, conjugated with IRDye800CW in different mouse models. Subcutaneous, orthotopic and intramuscular implanted tumors and tumor positive lymph nodes could be clearly visualized, even in knock-in models expressing the human homolog of PSCA (Zhang et al., 2018). Furthermore, fluorescence-guided resection of intramuscular tumors, revealed superior overall survival compared to conventional white light surgery (Zhang et al., 2018).

However, the size of minibodies does still put them above the cut-off value for renal clearance. Compounds smaller than 60 kDa are generally cleared via the kidneys, resulting in faster blood clearance, and correspondingly, diminished non-specific uptake. High contrast should thus be attained at an earlier timepoint, though at the expense of total tumor uptake (total fluorescent signal) (Freise and Wu, 2015). It has furthermore been shown that an inverse relation exists between the compound's size and its rate of tissue penetration, meaning that smaller fragments will distribute more quickly and more deeply throughout tumor and healthy tissues (Li et al., 2016; Xenaki et al., 2017). Antibody fragment types that are under investigation for FIGS are scFv's (25 kDa), diabodies (scFv dimer, 50 kDa), and Fab fragments (single scFv-CH3 chain, 55 kDa). The PSCA-specific diabody A2cDb, site-specifically conjugated to Cy5 was evaluated in murine subcutaneous and intramuscular prostate cancer models and optimal imaging contrast was achieved within 6 h post-injection (Sonn et al., 2016). The same diabody, site-specifically conjugated to IRDye800CW and directly labeled with ¹²⁴I, was recently used as bimodal tracer for the visualization of PSCA-positive pancreatic patient-derived orthotopic xenografts with PET and NIR fluorescence imaging. High-contrast imaging within 24 h or less was possible. It was furthermore demonstrated that the clearance pattern of the tracer was not significantly different from the iodinated-only form, indicating that the conjugation strategy used for IRDye800CW labeling did not impact the tracer's biodistribution or clearance (Zettlitz et al., 2018). This is in contrast to other studies with small antibody fragments that, as discussed above, often exhibit TBRs that are sufficiently high only between 24 and 72 h post-injection, as well as a significant amount of uptake in the liver. This has been found to be the case at least for an anti-HER3 diabody, anti-EpCAM-Fab fragment, and scFv's targeting CEA, EGFR and the tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72), all randomly labeled with IRDye800CW (Yang et al., 2014; Boonstra et al., 2015b; Alam et al., 2018; Gong et al., 2018; Boogerd et al., 2019).

In addition to the antibody fragments derived from conventional antibodies, the monomeric antigen-binding domains of heavy-chain only antibodies, so called single-domain antibodies or nanobodies, have been investigated for FIGS [recently reviewed in Debie et al. (2019)]. In preclinical studies, it has been shown that site-specifically IRDye800CW conjugated anti-HER2 and anti-CAIX nanobodies could achieve high contrast and specific imaging of tumor lesions within the first hours (1–4 h) after injection in murine breast and ovarian cancer models (Kijanka et al., 2013, 2016; Debie et al., 2017, 2018).

An advantage of antibodies and antibody-based tracers is that they can be generated in high through-put using established immunization strategies, and produced via fermentation in animal, yeast or bacterial cells (Ma and O'Kennedy, 2017). For tracer development, antibodies and antibody fragments represent a platform of compounds with a predominantly constant structure, except for variations in the antigen-binding loops prompting different specificities. This allows the definition of general properties and more versatile protocols for tracer preparation. Another type of platform technology are the non-antibody protein scaffolds that have a fixed backbone and are derived from different naturally occurring proteins. New antigen-specific protein scaffolds are selected from synthetic libraries and further engineered in vitro. As opposed to antibody-derived ligands, these compounds undergo no in vivo affinity maturation steps. Many different types of protein scaffolds have been described, but only affibodies, centyrins, and cystine knottins have been evaluated for FIGS so far.

Affibodies are small proteins of about 7 kDa that have been derived from the B-domain of Staphylococcus aureus protein A. They consist of a three helical structure that can, by mutation of 13 amino acids in the first two helices, bind different molecular targets. The affibody tracer ABY-029, directed toward EGFR and conjugated site-specifically with IRDye800CW via a C-terminal cysteine, is currently undergoing clinical translation for FIGS in glioma, head and neck cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. This tracer was first evaluated in an orthotopic human EGFR-expressing glioma model in rats (Figure 3B). The tracer was found to preferentially accumulate in the tumor, and this from 1 h post-injection onwards (de Souza et al., 2017). Other studies using fluorescently-labeled affibodies targeting EGFR and HER2 show similar optimal imaging timepoints (Zielinski et al., 2012; Tummers et al., 2018a).

Figure 3

Centyrins are 10 kDa fibronectin type III domains, derived from human tenascin, made up of 7 antiparallel β-strands. Binding affinity against different targets is generated via mutations in the connecting loops. The human/mouse cross-reactive anti-EGFR centyrin 83v2 labeled with the fluorophore S0456, was preclinically tested in subcutaneous lung cancer xenografts. Imaging could be performed within the first hours after injection and peak fluorescence was reached between 6 and 12 h pi. (Mahalingam et al., 2017).

Cystine knot peptides (3–4 kDa) are built around a naturally occurring motif, where the peptide forms a type of knot stabilized by three cysteine-bridges around a core of antiparallel β-strands. Through mutations, the loops that connect the strands can confer specific binding capabilities to the knottin peptide. The knottin peptide Tozuleristide, which consists of the scorpion venom derived ligand chlorotoxin conjugated to ICG, is currently undergoing clinical translation. This probe was able to distinguish tumor from normal tissue in resected human breast cancer specimens between 1 and 26 h post-injection (Dintzis et al., 2018). Tozuleristide is a naturally occurring knottin, whose exact specificity is not fully known, though MMP-2 and AnnexinA2 have been observed as targets. Alternatively, the knottin peptide R01-MG, with engineered affinity for the human and mouse α_vβ₆ integrin, has been tested pre-clinically. After conjugation with IRDye800CW, it was evaluated in subcutaneous, orthotopic, and spontaneous tumor models of pancreatic cancer. Fluorescent signal in a subcutaneous tumor became significantly different from a control knottin at 4 h post-injection, and maximal TBR was reached at 20 h post-injection. Cancer lesions, including small metastases could be clearly discerned from normal tissue in the orthotopic and spontaneous models (Tummers et al., 2018a).

Other than these scaffold proteins, non-scaffold peptides and small molecules can also be used as tracers in FIGS. The advantage of peptidic and small molecule-based tracers is that they can be produced at reduced cost compared to the other types of tracers. Target specific peptides and small molecules can be generated by rational design, or compounds with pre-existing affinities for the envisaged target, such as natural ligands, can be repurposed as fluorescent tracers. However, their structure and physicochemical properties vary greatly as they do not share a common backbone. General pharmacokinetic characteristics are hard to define, though peptide/small molecule-based tracers are expected to be small enough to attain at least partial renal clearance, depending on their hydrophobicity.

By far the most investigated peptide, is (cyclic) RGD, which targets a group of integrin receptors through a naturally occurring binding motif. cRGD peptides have been conjugated with a variety of different fluorophores, including Cy5.5, ICG, IRDye800CW and ZW800-1. After evaluation in subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor models of gastric, head and neck, pancreatic (Figure 3C) and colorectal cancer, tumor-to-background values were generally optimal between 4 and 24 h post-injection, depending on the fluorophore used (see above) (Choi et al., 2013; Cheng et al., 2016; Handgraaf et al., 2017). Other promising peptides for further development are tracers against for example PSMA (Wang et al., 2014; Bao et al., 2017; Baranski et al., 2017; Kularatne et al., 2018; Schottelius et al., 2018), the gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) (Cai et al., 2013; Suganya et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017a; Li et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2018) and uPAR (Yang et al., 2014; Christenen et al., 2017; Kurbegovic et al., 2018). Folate-receptor specific compounds were the first small molecules to be used in clinical trials for FIGS. The compound EC17 was constructed by conjugating folic acid with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (wavelength of maximal emission and excitation at 495/515 nm, outside the NIR region) (van Dam et al., 2011). EC17 was initially tested during debulking surgery in the case of late stage ovarian cancer, where FRα is widely expressed. To improve imaging contrast and detection of deeper located lesions, folic acid was labeled instead with the NIR dye S0456, to form OTL38. Additional clinical studies with both tracers have since been performed in lung, ovarian, and renal cancer. The surgical procedure is generally performed between 2 and 6 h post-injection of either tracer (Hoogstins et al., 2016; Keating et al., 2017; Mahalingam et al., 2018b; Predina et al., 2018).

Activatable Tracers

An alternative to the conventional “always-on” targeted tracers, is the use of “activatable” or “smart” probes. The general idea behind this approach is that these are non-fluorescent until activation on their target site, thereby suppressing non-specific fluorescence signals and increasing tumor-to-background contrast (Lacivita et al., 2012). Two main types of activatable tracers can be distinguished, activatable targeted tracers and enzyme-activated probes (reviewed by Mochida et al., 2018).

Activatable targeted tracers are not dissimilar in structure to always-on tracers, meaning they also consist of a targeting moiety and conjugated fluorophore. The difference lies in the fact that as a result of the presence of a quencher or due to aggregation to the targeting moiety, fluorescence is quenched. Most often, the fluorescent groups only become activated after binding a molecular target on the cell surface, internalization into the targeted cell, and subsequent metabolization. The simplest construction of such a tracer is through the conjugation of ICG to a targeting moiety (Sano et al., 2013; Watanabe et al., 2014). ICG fluorescence has been found to be already significantly quenched at conjugation ratios of 1:1 with a monoclonal antibody. Upon cleavage in the lysosomes, ICG's full fluorescence activity is restored. It is however important to note that hepatic uptake, and consequent clearing of the antibody-ICG conjugate will cause significant background fluorescence (Ogawa et al., 2015). Alternatively, for an ATTO680-Trastuzumab conjugate, the use of a “molecular-switch” has been demonstrated (Kim et al., 2017). In this case, the fluorophore is initially quenched by interaction with tryptophan residues on an antibody's framework, and activated by conformational changes due to receptor binding. The dual labeling of an antibody with a fluorophore and a quencher is another possibility. This was demonstrated in a preclinical study, where the anti-EGFR antibody Cetuximab was co-conjugated with the fluorophore AF660 and quencher IRDye QC-1 at an average antibody:fluorophore:quencher ratio of 1:2:6. Similarly to ICG conjugated compounds, internalization into the target cells and subsequent catabolization will lift the quenching effect and reactivate fluorescence (Obaid et al., 2017).

Enzyme-activated tracers rely on the innate function of a target enzyme to activate the fluorescence of the probe. Proteases such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), cathepsins, and β-galactosidases are often targeted by these tracers. Activation can occur in several manners. When probes are quenched because of the spatial proximity of the fluorophore to a quenching group (which can also be another fluorophore) cleavage of the tracer will separate the quenching group from the fluorophore and activate the fluorescence. Alternatively, the probe can form a spirocyclic structure caging the fluorophore, and only becoming active when it linearizes after enzymatic cleavage (Lacivita et al., 2012; Mochida et al., 2018). Two enzyme-activated tracers, called LUM015 and AVB-620 are currently being clinically tested. LUM015 is a probe consisting of a quencher, QSY21, linked to a Cy5 fluorophore using the peptide sequence “‘GGRK,” which is in turn also linked to a 20 kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) on the Cy5 side. Upon cleavage by cathepsins, the Cy5 fluorophore regains its fluorescence. The PEG-chain is included into this structure to slow diffusion of the activated fluorophore and increase contrast. Indeed, if the probe is not retained, diffusion of signal from the cleavage site may negatively impact the potential for tumor delineation. Clinical studies in breast cancer and soft tissue sarcoma patients showed that tumor imaging could be performed between 2 and 30 h after intravenous injection of this tracer (Whitley et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2018). AVB-620 is an activatable cell-penetrating peptide. It consists of a Cy5 conjugated cell penetrating peptide, bound through a linker to a neutralizing, Cy7 conjugated, sequence. Due to the spatial proximity of both fluorophores, the Cy5 signal is quenched for the Cy7 fluorophore's emission. Upon cleavage by MMP-2 or MMP-9, both sequences are released, leading to cellular uptake of the Cy5 peptide (causing increased retention of fluorescence), increased Cy5 fluorescent signal and decreased Cy7 fluorescence. To differentiate tumor from normal, instead of the total fluorescent signal, the Cy5:Cy7 ratio is determined. In breast cancer patients, tumor delineation was generally possible between 2 and 20 h post-injection (Unkart et al., 2017). Other than these clinical studies, several other enzyme-activated tracers for FIGS are being preclinically developed (Table 2). Besides those that are similarly structured to the clinically investigated compounds (separate fluorophore and quenching group), several spirocyclic compounds may also be of interest for clinical translation. For example, a γ-Glutamyl-transpeptidase (GGT) activated probe called gGlu-HMRG was designed using the visible wavelength fluorophore hydroxymethyl rhodamine green (wavelength of maximal excitation/emission at 490/520 nm, outside the NIR region). Normally, this tracer is non-fluorescent due to quenching by its spirocyclic structure, but it becomes activated when the enzyme cleaves an internal γ-glutamyl bond and linearizes (Urano et al., 2011). This tracer, and similarly designed tracers have been tested on excised tumor tissue, and could differentiate tumor from normal after spraying on patient samples of colorectal, breast, oral, and ovarian cancer (Figure 3D) (Urano et al., 2011; Fujii et al., 2014; Asanuma et al., 2015; Sato et al., 2015; Ueo et al., 2015; Matsuzaki et al., 2016; Slooter et al., 2018).

Discussion on the Future Development of FIGS Tracers

Over the last decade, FIGS has been developing at a rising pace and the potential benefits of specific molecular tracers have become clear. Initial successes were reached with the clinical translation of the folate-based tracers EC17 and OTL38 as well as IRDye800CW-labeled antibodies. Meanwhile, additional tracers have entered the phase of clinical evaluation and many more are being tested at preclinical level; from classical antibody-based probes which are widely available and relatively easy to generate, to smaller tracers with higher in vivo specificity and faster kinetics allowing administration shortly before surgery. Novel designs are continuously emerging, and the importance of design-related aspects, such as the physicochemical properties of the fluorophore itself, the type of targeting ligand and the chosen target, have become apparent. Further research is needed to better understand how all these factors impact the in vivo pharmacokinetics and targeting of forthcoming FIGS tracers, to optimize their design and reduce their production cost.

Particular types of molecular tracers may furthermore be more suited for specific applications. For example, hybrid tracers are expected to offer superior sensitivity for the intra-operative detection of metastasized lymph nodes, while the ability to topically apply activatable tracers without the need for washing could be convenient to check the surgical wound for residual disease after resection or for the diagnosis of lesions during endoscopic examination.

Preclinical studies are valuable for initial assessment of the pharmacokinetics and possible application of FIGS tracers. It is, however, important to also critically appraise conclusions drawn from these studies, as there are limitations to the preclinical models used as indicators of possible future clinical success. Subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor models based on cell lines highly overexpressing the molecular target of interest are suitable for demonstrating specificity of the tracer, by comparing uptake with a non-targeting control compound or in receptor-negative cell line. However, although orthotopic models provide better insight on relevant tissue background signal, the homogenous manner of tumor development in these types of models does not adequately reflect the complexity and heterogeneity of a human tumor including its microenvironment. Furthermore, non-specific uptake of the tracer cannot be properly assessed unless it is reactive for the murine variant of the target as well, or alternatively, unless knock-in models of the relevant target are used. Although patient-derived xenografts can alleviate some of these issues, even using these advanced models, surgical efficiency remains difficult to assess in mice. Large animals may offer improvement as the more sizeable organs and inter-organ spaces of i.e., porcine and canine models make for a more realistic setting to assay FIGS contrast agents (Lwin et al., 2018a). Moreover, these can also be used to better estimate the required dose, monitor possible toxic effects, and even identify failure of the hypothesis before unnecessary large cost investments for cGMP drug development are made. In the end, however, the actual clinical value of new tracers can only be established in patients. This will in addition to the determination of merely objective endpoints such as safety, tumor negative margins, recurrence and survival, also enable the evaluation of more subjective outcomes such as quality of life.

References

• 1

  AlamM. K.El-SayedA.BarretoK.BernhardW.FongeH.GeyerC. R. (2018). Site-specific fluorescent labeling of antibodies and diabodies using SpyTag/SpyCatcher system for in vivo optical imaging. Mol. Imaging Biol.21, 54–66. 10.1007/s11307-018-1222-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AntarisA. L.ChenH.ChengK.SunY.HongG.QuC.et al. (2016). A small-molecule dye for NIR-II imaging. Nat. Mater. 15, 235–242. 10.1038/nmat4476

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AounF.AlbisinniS.ZanatyM.HassanT.JanetschekG.van VelthovenR. (2017). Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node identification in urologic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol. Nefrol. 70, 361–369. 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02932-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AsanumaD.SakabeM.KamiyaM.YamamotoK.HiratakeJ.OgawaM.et al. (2015). Sensitive β-galactosidase-targeting fluorescence probe for visualizing small peritoneal metastatic tumours in vivo. Nat. Commun. 6:6463. 10.1038/ncomms7463

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BaikF. M.HansenS.KnoblaughS. E.SahetyaD.MitchellR. M.XuC.et al. (2016). Fluorescence identification of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and high-risk oral dysplasia with BLZ-100, a Chlorotoxin-indocyanine green conjugate. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 142, 330–338. 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3617

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  BaoK.LeeJ. H.KangH.ParkG. K.El FakhriG.ChoiH. S. (2017). PSMA-targeted contrast agents for intraoperative imaging of prostate cancer. Chem. Commun. 53, 1611–1614. 10.1039/C6CC09781B

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  BaranskiA. C.SchäferM.Bauder-WüstU.RoscherM.SchmidtJ.StenauE.et al. (2017). PSMA-11 derived dual-labeled PSMA-inhibitors for preoperative PET imaging and precise fluorescence-guided surgery of prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 59:201293. 10.2967/jnumed.117.201293

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BoogerdL. S. F.BoonstraM. C.PrevooH. A. J. M.HandgraafH. J. M.KuppenP. J. K.van de VeldeC. J. H.et al. (2019). Fluorescence-guided tumor detection with a novel anti-EpCAM targeted antibody fragment: preclinical validation. Surg. Oncol. 28, 1–8. 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.10.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  BoogerdL. S. F.HoogstinsC. E. S.SchaapD. P.KustersM.HandgraafH. J. M.van der ValkM. J. M.et al. (2018). Safety and effectiveness of SGM-101, a fluorescent antibody targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, for intraoperative detection of colorectal cancer: a dose-escalation pilot study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3, 181–191. 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30395-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BoonstraM. C.de GeusS. W.PrevooH. A.HawinkelsL. J.van de VeldeC. J.KuppenP. J.et al. (2016). Selecting targets for tumor imaging: an overview of cancer-associated membrane proteins. Biomark. Cancer8:119. 10.4137/BIC.S38542

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BoonstraM. C.PrakashJ.Van De VeldeC. J.MeskerW. E.KuppenP. J.VahrmeijerA. L.et al. (2015a). Stromal targets for fluorescent-guided oncologic surgery. Front. Oncol. 5:254. 10.3389/fonc.2015.00254

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BoonstraM. C.TolnerB.SchaafsmaB. E.BoogerdL. S.PrevooH. A.BhavsarG.et al. (2015b). Preclinical evaluation of a novel CEA-targeting near-infrared fluorescent tracer delineating colorectal and pancreatic tumors. Int. J. Cancer137, 1910–1920. 10.1002/ijc.29571

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BoonstraM. C.van DrielP. B.van WilligenD. M.StammesM. A.PrevooH. A.TummersQ. R.et al. (2015c). uPAR-targeted multimodal tracer for pre- and intraoperative imaging in cancer surgery. Oncotarget6, 14260–14273. 10.18632/oncotarget.3680

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BoonstraM. C.Van DrielP. B. A. A.KeereweerS.PrevooH. A. J. M.StammesM. A.BaartV. M.et al. (2017). Preclinical uPAR-targeted multimodal imaging of locoregional oral cancer. Oral. Oncol. 66, 1–8. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.12.026

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BuckleT.KuilJ.van den BergN. S.BunschotenA.LambH. J.YuanH.et al. (2013). Use of a single hybrid imaging agent for integration of target validation with in vivo and ex vivo imaging of mouse tumor lesions resembling human DCIS. PLoS ONE8:e48324. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048324

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BunschotenA.Van WilligenD. M.BuckleT.Van Den BergN. S.WellingM. M.SpaS. J.et al. (2016). Tailoring fluorescent dyes to optimize a hybrid RGD-tracer. Bioconjug. Chem. 27, 1253–1258. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00093

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  ButteP. V.MamelakA.Parrish-NovakJ.DrazinD.ShweikehF.GangalumP. R.et al. (2014). Near-infrared imaging of brain tumors using the Tumor Paint BLZ-100 to achieve near-complete resection of brain tumors. Neurosurg. Focus36:E1. 10.3171/2013.11.FOCUS13497

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  CaiQ. Y.YuP.Besch-WillifordC.SmithC. J.SieckmanG. L.HoffmanT. J.et al. (2013). Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of gastrin releasing peptide receptor targeting in prostate cancer lymph node metastases. Prostate73, 842–854. 10.1002/pros.22630

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  ChandM.KellerD. S.JoshiH. M.DevotoL.Rodriguez-JustoM.CohenR. (2018). Feasibility of fluorescence lymph node imaging in colon cancer: FLICC. Tech. Coloproctol. 22, 271–277. 10.1007/s10151-018-1773-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  ChenY.DharaS.BanerjeeS. R.ByunY.PullambhatlaM.MeaseR. C.et al. (2009). A low molecular weight PSMA-based fluorescent imaging agent for cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 390, 624–629. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  ChengH.ChiC.ShangW.RengaowaS.CuiJ.YeJ.et al. (2016). Precise integrin-targeting near-infrared imaging-guided surgical method increases surgical qualification of peritoneal carcino-matosis from gastric cancer in mice. Oncotarget8, 6258–6272. 10.18632/oncotarget.14058

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  ChoiH. S.GibbsS. L.LeeJ. H.KimS. H.AshitateY.LiuF.et al. (2013). Targeted zwitterionic near-infrared fluorophores for improved optical imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 148–153. 10.1038/nbt.2468

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  ChoiH. S.NasrK.AlyabyevS.FeithD.LeeJ. H.KimS. H.et al. (2011). Synthesis and in vivo fate of zwitterionic near-infrared fluorophores. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 6258–6263. 10.1002/anie.201102459

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  ChristenenA.JuhlK.PerssonM.CharabiB. W.MortensenJ.KissK.et al. (2017). uPAR-targeted optical near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging and PET for image-guided surgery in head and neck cancer: proof-of-concept in orthotopic xenograft model. Oncotarget8, 15407–15419. 10.18632/oncotarget.14282

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  CilliersC.NesslerI.ChristodoluN.ThurberG. M. (2017). Tracking antibody distribution with near-infrared fluorescent dyes: impact of dye structure and degree of labeling on plasma clearance. Mol. Pharm. 14, 1623–1633. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b01091

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  CutterJ. L.CohenN. T.WangJ.SloanA. E.CohenA. R.PanneerselvamA.et al. (2012). Topical application of activity-based probes for visualization of brain tumor tissue. PLoS ONE7:e33060. 10.1371/journal.pone.0033060

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  DanhierF. (2016). To exploit the tumor microenvironment: since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine?J. Control. Release244, 108–121. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.11.015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  DayK. E.BeckL. N.DeepN. L.KovarJ.ZinnK. R.RosenthalE. L. (2013a). Fluorescently labeled therapeutic antibodies for detection of microscopic melanoma. Laryngoscope123, 2681–2689. 10.1002/lary.24102

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  DayK. E.SweenyL.KulbershB.ZinnK. R.RosenthalE. L. (2013b). Preclinical comparison of near-infrared-labeled cetuximab and panitumumab for optical imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Imaging Biol. 15, 722–729. 10.1007/s11307-013-0652-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  De BoerE.WarramJ. M.TuckerM. D.HartmanY. E.MooreL. S.De JongJ. S.et al. (2015). In vivo fluorescence immunohistochemistry: localization of fluorescently labeled cetuximab in squamous cell carcinomas. Sci. Rep. 5:10169. 10.1038/srep10169

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  de GeusS. W.BoogerdL. S.SwijnenburgR. J.MieogJ. S.TummersW. S.PrevooH. A.et al. (2016). Selecting tumor-specific molecular targets in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: paving the way for image-guided pancreatic surgery. Mol. Imaging Biol. 18, 807–819. 10.1007/s11307-016-0959-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  de SouzaA. L.MarraK.GunnJ.SamkoeK. S.HoopesP. J.FeldwischJ.et al. (2017). Fluorescent affibody molecule administered in vivo at a microdose level labels EGFR expressing glioma tumor regions. Mol. Imaging Biol. 19, 41–48. 10.1007/s11307-016-0980-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  DebieP.DevoogdtN.HernotS. (2019). Targeted nanobody-based molecular tracers for nuclear imaging and image-guided surgery. Antibodies8:12. 10.3390/antib8010012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  DebieP.Van QuathemJ.HansenI.BalaG.MassaS.DevoogdtN.et al. (2017). Effect of dye and conjugation chemistry on the biodistribution profile of near-infrared-labeled nanobodies as tracers for image-guided surgery. Mol. Pharm. 14, 1145–1153. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b01053

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  DebieP.VanhoeijM.PoortmansN.PuttemansJ.GillisK.DevoogdtN.et al. (2018). Improved debulking of peritoneal tumor implants by near-infrared fluorescent nanobody image guidance in an experimental mouse model. Mol. Imaging Biol. 20, 361–367. 10.1007/s11307-017-1134-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  DintzisS. M.HansenS.HarringtonK. M.TanL. C.MillerD. M.IshakL.et al. (2018). Real-time visualization of breast carcinoma in pathology specimens from patients receiving fluorescent tumor-marking agent tozuleristide. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.10.5858/arpa.2018-0197-OA. [Epub ahead of print].

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  El-SayedA.BernhardW.BarretoK.GonzalezC.HillW.PastushokL.et al. (2018). Evaluation of antibody fragment properties for near-infrared fluorescence imaging of HER3-positive cancer xenografts. Theranostics8, 4856–4869. 10.7150/thno.24252

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  FidelJ.KennedyK. C.DernellW. S.HansenS.WissV.StroudM. R.et al. (2015). Preclinical validation of the utility of BLZ-100 in providing fluorescence contrast for imaging spontaneous solid tumors. Cancer Res. 75, 4283–4291. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0471

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  FreiseA. C.WuA. M. (2015). In vivo imaging with antibodies and engineered fragments. Mol. Immunol. 67, 142–152. 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.04.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  FujiiT.KamiyaM.UranoY. (2014). In vivo imaging of intraperitoneally disseminated tumors in model mice by using activatable fluorescent small-molecular probes for activity of cathepsins. Bioconjug. Chem. 25, 1838–1846. 10.1021/bc5003289

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  GaoR. W.TeraphongphomN.de BoerE.van den BergN. S.DiviV.KaplanM. J.et al. (2018a). Safety of panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical navigation in head and neck cancers. Theranostics8, 2488–2495. 10.7150/thno.24487

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  GaoR. W.TeraphongphomN. T.van den BergN. S.MartinB. A.OberhelmanN. J.DiviV.et al. (2018b). Determination of tumor margins with surgical specimen mapping using near-infrared fluorescence. Cancer Res. 78, 5144–5154. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0878

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  GongH.KovarJ. L.CheungL.RosenthalE. L.OliveD. M. (2014). A comparative study of affibody, panitumumab, and EGF for near-infrared fluorescence imaging of EGFR- and EGFRvIII-expressing tumors. Cancer Biol. Ther. 15, 185–193. 10.4161/cbt.26719

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  GongL.DingH.LongN. E.SullivanB. J.MartinE. W.MaglieryT. J.et al. (2018). A 3E8.scFv.Cys-IR800 conjugate targeting TAG-72 in an orthotopic colorectal cancer model. Mol. Imaging Biol. 20, 47–54. 10.1007/s11307-017-1096-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  GutowskiM.FrameryB.BoonstraM. C.GaramboisV.QuenetF.DumasK.et al. (2017). SGM-101: An innovative near-infrared dye-antibody conjugate that targets CEA for fluorescence-guided surgery. Surg. Oncol. 26, 153–162. 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.03.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  GuzzoT. J.JiangJ.KeatingJ.DeJesusE.JudyR.NieS.et al. (2016). Intraoperative molecular diagnostic imaging can identify renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol. 195, 748–755. 10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.093

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  HamidiH.IvaskaJ. (2018). Every step of the way: integrins in cancer progression and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer8, 533–548. 10.1038/s41568-018-0038-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  HandgraafH. J. M.BoonstraM. C.PrevooH. A. J. M.KuilJ.BordoM. W.BoogerdL. S. F.et al. (2017). Real-time near-infrared fluorescence imaging using cRGD-ZW800-1 for intraoperative visualization of multiple cancer types. Oncotarget8, 21054–21066. 10.18632/oncotarget.15486

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  HarbeckN.GnantM. (2017). Breast cancer. Lancet389, 1134–1150. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31891-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  HarlaarN. J.KollerM.de JonghS. J.van LeeuwenB. L.HemmerP. H.KruijffS.et al. (2016). Molecular fluorescence-guided surgery of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: a single-centre feasibility study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1, 283–290. 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30082-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  HeathC. H.DeepN. L.SweenyL.ZinnK. R.RosenthalE. L. (2012). Use of Panitumumab-IRDye800 to image microscopic head and neck cancer in an orthotopic surgical model. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 19, 3879–3887. 10.1245/s10434-012-2435-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  HekmanM. C.RijpkemaM.MuselaersC. H.OosterwijkE.Hulsbergen-Van de KaaC. A.BoermanO. C.et al. (2018). Tumor-targeted dual-modality imaging to improve intraoperative visualization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a first in man study. Theranostics8, 2161–2170. 10.7150/thno.23335

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  HekmanM. C. H.BoermanO. C.De WeijertM.BosD. L.OosterwijkE.LangenhuijsenH. F.et al. (2016). Targeted dual-modality imaging in renal cell carcinoma: an ex vivo kidney perfusion study. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 4634–46442. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2937

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  HekmanM. C. H.RijpkemaM.BosD. L.OosterwijkE.GoldenbergD. M.MuldersP. F. A.et al. (2017). Detection of micrometastases using SPECT/fluorescence dual-modality imaging in a CEA-expressing tumor model. J. Nucl. Med. 58:185470. 10.2967/jnumed.116.185470

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  HentzenJ. E. K. R.de JonghS. J.HemmerP. H. J.van der PlasW. Y.van DamG. M.KruijffS. (2018). Molecular fluorescence-guided surgery of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: a narrative review. J. Surg. Oncol. 118, 332–343. 10.1002/jso.25106

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  HernandezR.SunH.EnglandC. G.ValdovinosH. F.EhlerdingE. B.BarnhartT. E.et al. (2016). CD146-targeted immunoPET and NIRF imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma with a dual-labeled monoclonal antibody. Theranostics6, 1918–1933. 10.7150/thno.15568

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  HolmC. (2010). Clinical applications of ICG fluorescence imaging in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Open Surg. Oncol. J.210, 37–47. 10.2174/1876504101002020037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  HongG.AntarisA. L.DaiH. (2017). Near-infrared fluorophores for biomedical imaging. Nat. Biomed. Eng.1:0010. 10.1038/s41551-016-0010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  HoogstinsC. E.TummersQ. R.GaarenstroomK. N.de KroonC. D.TrimbosJ. B.BosseT.et al. (2016). A novel tumor-specific agent for intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging : a translational study in healthy volunteers and patients with ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 2929–2938. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2640

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  HoogstinsC. E. S.BoogerdL. S. F.Sibinga MulderB. G.MieogJ. S. D.SwijnenburgR. J.van de VeldeC. J. H.et al. (2018). Image-guided surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer: first results of a clinical trial using SGM-101, a novel carcinoembryonic antigen-targeting, near-infrared fluorescent agent. Ann. Surg. Oncol.25, 3350–3357. 10.1245/s10434-018-6655-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  HuangR.ViderJ.KovarJ. L.OliveD. M.MellinghoffI. K.Mayer-KuckukP.et al. (2012). Integrin αvβ3-targeted IRDye 800CW near-infrared imaging of glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 5731–5740. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0374

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  HyunH.OwensE. A.NarayanaL.WadaH.GravierJ.BaoK.et al. (2014). Central C-C bonding increases optical and chemical stability of NIR fluorophores. RSC Adv. 4, 58762–58768. 10.1039/C4RA11225C

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  IijimaT.AoyagiT.IwaoY.MasudaJ.FuseM.KobayashiN.et al. (1997). Cardiac output and circulating blood volume analysis by pulse dye-densitometry. J Clin Monit. 13, 81–89.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  JavidfarJ.SpeicherP. J.HartwigM. G.D'AmicoT. A.BerryM. F. (2016). Impact of positive margins on survival in patients undergoing esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer presented at the poster session of the fifty-first annual meeting of the society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 24-28, 2015. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 101, 1060–1067. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  JinT. (2019). Critical review-recent progress in NIR fluorophores emitting over 1000 nm for Bioimaging. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 8, R9–R13. 10.1149/2.0111901jss

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  JuhlK.ChristensenA.PerssonM.PlougM.KjaerA. (2016). Peptide-Based optical uPAR imaging for surgery: in vivo testing of ICG-Glu-Glu- AE105. PLoS ONE11:e0147428. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147428

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  KalliK. R.ObergA. L.KeeneyG. L.ChristiansonT. J.LowP. S.KnutsonK. L.et al. (2008). Folate receptor alpha as a tumor target in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.108, 619–626. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.020

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  KanduluruA. K.SrinivasaraoM.LowP. S. (2016). Design, synthesis, and evaluation of a neurokinin-1 receptor-targeted near-IR dye for fluorescence-guided surgery of neuroendocrine cancers. Bioconjug. Chem. 27, 2157–2165. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00374

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  KeatingJ. J.RungeJ. J.SinghalS.NimsS.VenegasO.DurhamA. C.et al. (2017). Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging targeting folate receptors identifies lung cancer in a large-animal model. Cancer123, 1051–1060. 10.1002/cncr.30419

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  KeereweerS.KerrebijnJ. D.MolI. M.MieogJ. S.van DrielP. B.Baatenburg de JongR. J.et al. (2012). Optical imaging of oral squamous cell carcinoma and cervical lymph node metastasis. Head Neck34, 1002–1008. 10.1002/hed.21861

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  KijankaM.WarndersF. J.El KhattabiM.Lub-De HoogeM.Van DamG. M.NtziachristosV.et al. (2013). Rapid optical imaging of human breast tumour xenografts using anti-HER2 VHHs site-directly conjugated to IRDye 800CW for image-guided surgery. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging40, 1718–1729. 10.1007/s00259-013-2471-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  KijankaM. M.van BrusselA. S.van der WallE.MaliW. P.van DiestP. J.van Bergen En HenegouwenP. M.et al. (2016). Optical imaging of pre-invasive breast cancer with a combination of VHHs targeting CAIX and HER2 increases contrast and facilitates tumour characterization. EJNMMI Res.6:14. 10.1186/s13550-016-0166-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  KimH.ChoM. H.ChoiH. S.LeeB. I.ChoiY. (2019). Zwitterionic near-infrared fluorophore-conjugated epidermal growth factor for fast, real-time, and target-cell-specific cancer imaging. Theranostics9, 1085–1095. 10.7150/thno.29719

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  KimH.ChoiH. S.KimS. K.LeeB.ChoiY. (2017). Antigen-responsive molecular sensor enables real-time tumor-specific imaging. Theranostics7, 952–961. 10.7150/thno.16647

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  KittleD. S.MamelakM. D. A.Parrish-NovakJ. E.HansenS.PatilR.GangalumP. R.et al. (2014). Fluorescence-guided tumor visualization using the tumor paint BLZ-100. Cureus6:e210. 10.7759/cureus.210

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  KobayashiH.ChoykeP. L.OgawaM. (2016). Monoclonal antibody-based optical molecular imaging probes; considerations and caveats in chemistry, biology and pharmacology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 33, 32–38. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.05.015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  KorbM. L.HartmanY. E.KovarJ.ZinnK. R.BlandK. I.RosenthalE. L. (2014). Use of monoclonal antibody-IRDye800CW bioconjugates in the resection of breast cancer. J. Surg. Res. 188, 119–128. 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1089

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  KorbM. L.HuhW. K.BooneJ. D.WarramJ. M.ChungT. K.de BoerE.et al. (2015). Laparoscopic fluorescent visualization of the ureter with intravenous IRDye800CW. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 22, 799–806. 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  KovarJ. L.SimpsonM. A.Schutz-GeschwenderA.OliveD. M. (2007). A systematic approach to the development of fluorescent contrast agents for optical imaging of mouse cancer models. Anal. Biochem. 367, 1–12. 10.1016/j.ab.2007.04.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  KuilJ.BuckleT.YuanH.van den BergN. S.OishiS.FujiiN.et al. (2011). Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of a bimodal CXCR4 antagonistic peptide. Bioconjug. Chem. 22, 859–864. 10.1021/bc2000947

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  KularatneS. A.ThomasM.MyersC. H.GagareP.KanduluruA. K.CrainC. J.et al. (2018). Evaluation of novel prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted near-infrared imaging agent for fluorescence-guided surgery for prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. Clincanres. 2018:0803. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0803

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  KurbegovicS.JuhlK.ChenH.QuC.DingB.LethJ. M.et al. (2018). Molecular targeted NIR-II probe for image-guided brain tumor surgery. Bioconjug. Chem. 29, 3833–3840. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00669

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  LacivitaE.LeopoldoM.BerardiF.ColabufoN. A.PerroneR. (2012). Activatable fluorescent probes: a new concept in optical molecular imaging. Curr. Med. Chem. 19, 4731–4741. 10.2174/092986712803341511

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  LambertsL. E.KochM.de JongJ. S.AdamsA. L. L.GlatzJ.KranendonkM. E. G.et al. (2017). Tumor-specific uptake of fluorescent bevacizumab-IRDye800CW microdosing in patients with primary breast cancer: a phase I feasibility study. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 2730–2742. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0437

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  LiD.ZhangJ.ChiC.XiaoX.WangJ.LangL.et al. (2018). First-in-human study of PET and optical dual-modality image-guided surgery in glioblastoma using Ga-IRDye800CW-BBN. Theranostics8, 2508–2520. 10.7150/thno.25599

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  LiG.XingY.WangJ.ContiP. S.ChenK. (2014). Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of CD13 receptor expression using a novel Cy5.5-labeled dimeric NGR peptide. Amino Acids46, 1547–1556. 10.1007/s00726-014-1727-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  LiJ.ChenK.LiuH.ChengK.YangM.ZhangJ.et al. (2012). Activatable near-infrared fluorescent probe for in vivo imaging of fibroblast activation protein-alpha. Bioconjug. Chem. 23, 1704–1711. 10.1021/bc300278r

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  LiZ.KrippendorffB. F.SharmaS.WalzA. C.LavéT.ShahD. K. (2016). Influence of molecular size on tissue distribution of antibody fragments. MAbs8, 113–119. 10.1080/19420862.2015.1111497

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  LiberaleG.BourgeoisP.LarsimontD.MoreauM.DonckierV.IshizawaT. (2017). Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery after IV injection in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 43, 1656–1667. 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.04.015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  LisyM. R.GoermarA.ThomasC.PauliJ.Resch-GengerU.KaiserW. A.et al. (2008). In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging of carcinoembryonic antigen- expressing tumor cells in mice. Radiology247, 779–787. 10.1148/radiol.2472070123

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  LiuY.WangZ.LiX.MaX.WangS.KangF.et al. (2018). Near-infrared fluorescent peptides with high tumor selectivity : novel probes for image-guided surgical resection of orthotopic glioma. Mol. Pharm. 16, 108–117. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00888

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  LuoH.EnglandC. G.GoelS.GravesS. A.AiF.LiuB.et al. (2017). ImmunoPET and near-infrared fluorescence imaging of pancreatic cancer with a dual-labeled bispecific antibody fragment. Mol. Pharm. 14, 1646–1655. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b01123

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  LütjeS.RijpkemaM.FranssenG. M.FracassoG.HelfrichW.EekA.et al. (2014a). Dual-modality image-guided surgery of prostate cancer with a radiolabeled fluorescent anti-PSMA monoclonal antibody. J. Nucl. Med. 55, 995–1001. 10.2967/jnumed.114.138180

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  LütjeS.RijpkemaM.HelfrichW.OyenW. J.BoermanO. C. (2014b). Targeted radionuclide and fluorescence dual-modality imaging of cancer: preclinical advances and clinical translation. Mol. Imaging Biol. 16, 747–755. 10.1007/s11307-014-0747-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  LwinT. M.HoffmanR. M.BouvetM. (2018a). Advantages of patient-derived orthotopic mouse models and genetic reporters for developing fluorescence-guided surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 118, 253–264. 10.1002/jso.25150

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  LwinT. M.MiyakeK.MurakamiT.DeLongJ. C.AmirfakhriS.FilemoniF.et al. (2018b). Fluorescent humanized anti-CEA antibody specifically labels metastatic pancreatic cancer in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse model. Oncotarget9, 37333–37342. 10.18632/oncotarget.26484

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  LwinT. M.MurakamiT.MiyakeK.YazakiP. J.ShivleyJ. E.HoffmanR. M.et al. (2018c). Tumor-specific labeling of pancreatic cancer using a humanized anti-CEA antibody conjugated to a near-infrared fluorophore. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 25, 1079–1085. 10.1245/s10434-018-6344-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  MaH.O'KennedyR. (2017). Recombinant antibody fragment production. Methods116, 23–33. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.11.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  MahalingamS. M.ChuH.LiuX.LeamonC. P.LowP. S. (2018a). Carbonic anhydrase IX-targeted near-infrared dye for fluorescence imaging of hypoxic tumors. Bioconjug. Chem. 29, 3320–3331. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00509

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  MahalingamS. M.DudkinV. Y.GoldbergS.KleinD.YiF.SinghalS.et al. (2017). Evaluation of a centyrin-based near-infrared probe for fluorescence-guided surgery of epidermal growth factor receptor positive tumors. Bioconjug. Chem. 28, 2865–2873. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00566

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  MahalingamS. M.KularatneS. A.MyersC. H.GagareP.NorshiM.LiuX.et al. (2018b). Evaluation of novel tumor-targeted near-infrared probe for fluorescence-guided surgery of cancer. J. Med. Chem. 61, 9637–9646. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01115

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  MarshallM. V.DraneyD.Sevick-MuracaE. M.OliveD. M. (2010). Single-dose intravenous toxicity study of IRDye 800CW in sprague-dawley Rats. Mol. Imaging Biol. 12, 583–594. 10.1007/s11307-010-0317-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  MarstonJ. C.KennedyG. D.LapiS. E.HartmanY. E.RichardsonM. T.ModiH. M.et al. (2019). Panitumumab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical resection of colorectal cancer. J. Surg. Res. 239, 44–51. 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.065

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  MassaS.VikaniN.BettiC.BalletS.VanderhaegenS.SteyaertJ.et al. (2016a). Sortase a-mediated site-specific labeling of camelid single-domain antibody-fragments: a versatile strategy for multiple molecular imaging modalities. Contrast. Media Mol. Imaging11, 328–339. 10.1002/cmmi.1696

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  MassaS.XavierC.De VosJ.CaveliersV.LahoutteT.MuyldermansS.et al. (2014). Site-specific labeling of cysteine-tagged camelid single-domain antibody-fragments for use in molecular imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 25, 979–988. 10.1021/bc500111t

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  MassaS.XavierC.MuyldermansS.DevoogdtN. (2016b). Emerging site-specific bioconjugation strategies for radioimmunotracer development. Exp. Opin. Drug Deliv. 13, 1149–1163. 10.1080/17425247.2016.1178235

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  MatsuzakiH.KamiyaM.IwatateR. J.AsanumaD.WatanabeT.UranoY. (2016). Novel hexosaminidase-targeting fluorescence probe for visualizing human colorectal cancer. Bioconjug. Chem. 27, 973–981. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00037

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  MazzoccoC.FracassoG.Germain-GenevoisC.Dugot-SenantN.FiginiM.ColombattiM.et al. (2016). In vivo imaging of prostate cancer using an anti-PSMA scFv fragment as a probe. Sci. Rep. 6, 10919–10930. 10.1038/srep23314

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  MetildiC. A.FelsenC. N.SavariarE. N.NguyenQ. T.KaushalS.HoffmanR. M.et al. (2015). Ratiometric activatable cell-penetrating peptides label pancreatic cancer, enabling fluorescence-guided surgery, which reduces metastases and recurrence in orthotopic mouse models. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22, 2082–2087. 10.1245/s10434-014-4144-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  MiampambaM.LiuJ.HarootunianA.GaleA. J.BairdS.ChenS. L.et al. (2017). Sensitive in vivo visualization of breast cancer using ratiometric protease-activatable fluorescent imaging agent, AVB-620. Theranostics7, 3369–3386. 10.7150/thno.20678

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  MiaoZ.RenG.LiuH.JiangL.ChengZ. (2011). Cy5.5-labeled affibody molecule for near-infrared fluorescent optical imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor positive tumors. J. Biomed. Opt. 15:036007. 10.1117/1.3432738

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  MochidaA.OgataF.NagayaT.ChoykeP. L.KobayashiH. (2018). Activatable fluorescent probes in fluorescence-guided surgery: Practical considerations. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 26, 925–930. 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.12.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  MooreL. S.RosenthalE. L.de BoerE.PrinceA. C.PatelN.RichmanJ. M.et al. (2017). Effects of an unlabeled loading dose on tumor-specific uptake of a fluorescently labeled antibody for optical surgical navigation. Mol. Imaging Biol. 19, 610–616. 10.1007/s11307-016-1022-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  MujumdarR. B.ErnstL. A.MujumdarS. R.LewisC. J.WaggonerA. S. (1993). Cyanine dye labeling reagents: sulfoindocyanine succinimidyl esters. Bioconjug. Chem. 4, 105–111. 10.1021/bc00020a001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  NagayaT.NakamuraY. A.ChoykeP. L.KobayashiH. (2017). Fluorescence-guided surgery. Front. Oncol.7:314. 10.3389/fonc.2017.00314

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  NakajimaT.MitsunagaM.BanderN. H.HestonW. D.ChoykeP. L.KobayashiH. (2011). Targeted, activatable, in vivo fluorescence imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) positive tumors using the quenched humanized J591 antibody-indocyanine green (ICG) conjugate. Bioconjug. Chem. 22, 1700–1705. 10.1021/bc2002715

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  NakasekoY.IshizawaT.SaiuraA. (2018). Fluorescence-guided surgery for liver tumors. J. Surg. Oncol.2018:324–331. 10.1002/jso.25128

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  NappJ.PardoL. A.HartungF.TietzeL. F.StühmerW.AlvesF. (2016). In vivo imaging of tumour xenografts with an antibody targeting the potassium channel Kv10.1. Eur. Biophys. J. 45, 721–733. 10.1007/s00249-016-1152-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  NeumanB. P.EiflerJ. B.CastanaresM.ChowdhuryW. H.ChenY.MeaseR. C.et al. (2015). Real-time, near-infrared fluorescence imaging with an optimized dye/light source/camera combination for surgical guidance of prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 771–780. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0891

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  NicholsJ. W.BaeY. H. (2014). EPR: evidence and fallacy. J. Control. Release190, 451–464. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.057

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  ObaidG.SpringB. Q.BanoS.HasanT. (2017). Activatable clinical fluorophore-quencher antibody pairs as dual molecular probes for the enhanced specificity of image-guided surgery. J. Biomed. Opt. 22:121607. 10.1117/1.JBO.22.12.121607

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  OdenthalJ.RijpkemaM.BosD.WagenaE.CroesH.GrenmanR.et al. (2018). Targeting CD44v6 for fluorescence-guided surgery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 8:10467. 10.1038/s41598-018-28059-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  OforiL. O.WithanaN. P.PrestwoodT. R.VerdoesM.BradyJ. J.WinslowM. M.et al. (2015). Design of protease activated optical contrast agents that exploit a latent lysosomotropic effect for use in fluorescence-guided surgery. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1977–1988. 10.1021/acschembio.5b00205

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  OgawaM.KosakaN.ChoykeP. L.KobayashiH. (2009). H-type dimer formation of fluorophores: a mechanism for activatable, in vivo optical molecular imaging. ACS Chem. Biol. 4, 535–546. 10.1021/cb900089j

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  OgawaM.KosakaN.ChoykeP. L.KobayashiH. (2015). In vivo molecular imaging of cancer with a quenching near infrared fluorescent probe using conjugates of monoclonal antibodies and indocyanine green. Cancer Res. 69, 1268–1272. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3116

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  OlafsenT.CheungC. W.YazakiP. J.LiL.SundaresanG.GambhirS. S.et al. (2004). Covalent disulfide-linked anti-CEA diabody allows site-specific conjugation and radiolabeling for tumor targeting applications. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 17, 21–27. 10.1093/protein/gzh009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  OroscoR. K.TapiaV. J.CalifanoJ. A.ClaryB.CohenE. E. W.KaneC.et al. (2018). Positive surgical margins in the 10 most common solid cancers. Sci. Rep. 8:5686. 10.1038/s41598-018-23403-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  PernerS.HoferM. D.KimR.ShahR. B.LiH.MöllerP.et al. (2007). Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression as a predictor of prostate cancer progression. Hum. Pathol. 38, 696–701. 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.11.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  PogueB. W.RosenthalE. L.AchilefuS.van DamG. M. (2018). Perspective review of what is needed for molecular-specific fluorescence-guided surgery. J. Biomed. Opt. 23:1–9. 10.1117/1.JBO.23.10.100601

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  PredinaJ. D.NewtonA. D.XiaL.CorbettC.ConnollyC.ShinM.et al. (2018). An open label trial of folate receptor-targeted intraoperative molecular imaging to localize pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas. Oncotarget9, 13517–13529. 10.18632/oncotarget.24399

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  PrinceA. C.McGeeA. S.SiegelH.RosenthalE. L.BehnkeN. K.WarramJ. M. (2018). Evaluation of fluorescence-guided surgery agents in a murine model of soft tissue fibrosarcoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 117, 1179–1187. 10.1002/jso.24950

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  QiS.MiaoZ.LiuH.XuY.FengY.ChengZ. (2012). Evaluation of four affibody-based near-infrared fluorescent probes for optical imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor positive tumors. Bioconjug. Chem. 23, 1149–1156. 10.1021/bc200596a

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  Ribeiro de SouzaA. L.MarraK.GunnJ.SamkoeK. S.HullS.PaulsenK. D.et al. (2018). Optimizing glioma detection using an EGFR-targeted fluorescent affibody. Photochem. Photobiol. 94, 1167–1171. 10.1111/php.13003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  RijpkemaM.OyenW. J.BosD.FranssenG. M.GoldenbergD. M.BoermanO. C. (2014). SPECT- and fluorescence image-guided surgery using a dual-labeled carcinoembryonic antigen-targeting antibody. J. Nucl. Med. 55, 1519–1524. 10.2967/jnumed.114.142141

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  RosenthalE. L.MooreL. S.TipirneniK.De BoerE.StevensT. M.HartmanY. E.et al. (2017). Sensitivity and specificity of cetuximab-IRDye800CW to identify regional metastatic disease in head and neck cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 4744–4752. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2968

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  RosenthalE. L.WarramJ. M.de BoerE.ChungT. K.KorbM. L.Brandwein-GenslerM.et al. (2016). Safety and tumor-specificity of cetuximab-IRDye800 for surgical navigation in head and neck cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 4062–4072. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3284

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  RoyJ.KaakeM.LowP. S. (2019). Small molecule targeted NIR dye conjugate for imaging LHRH receptor positive cancers. Oncotarget10, 152–160. 10.18632/oncotarget.26520

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  RyuJ. H.ShinM.KimS. A.LeeS.KimH.KooH.et al. (2013). In vivo fluorescence imaging for cancer diagnosis using receptor-targeted epidermal growth factor-based nanoprobe. Biomaterials34, 9149–9159. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.026

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  SanoK.NakajimaT.AliT.BartlettD. W.WuA. M.KimI.et al. (2013). Activatable fluorescent cys-diabody conjugated with indocyanine green derivative: consideration of fluorescent catabolite kinetics on molecular imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 18:101304. 10.1117/1.JBO.18.10.101304

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  SatoC.AbeS.SaitoY.So TsurukiE.TakamaruH.MakazuM.et al. (2015). A pilot study of fluorescent imaging of colorectal tumors using a γ-glutamyl-transpeptidase-activatable fluorescent probe. Digestion91, 70–76. 10.1159/000369367

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  SatoK.GorkaA. P.NagayaT.MichieM. S.NakamuraY.NaniR. R.et al. (2016a). Effect of charge localization on the in vivo optical imaging properties of near-infrared cyanine dye/monoclonal antibody conjugates. Mol. Biosyst. 12, 3046–3056. 10.1039/C6MB00371K

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  SatoK.GorkaA. P.NagayaT.MichieM. S.NaniR. R.NakamuraY.et al. (2016b). Role of fluorophore charge on the in vivo optical imaging properties of near-infrared cyanine dye/monoclonal antibody conjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 27, 404–413. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00492

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  SchotteliusM.WurzerA.WissmillerK.BeckR.KochM.GkorpasD.et al. (2018). Synthesis and preclinical characterization of the PSMA-targeted hybrid tracer PSMA-I&F for nuclear and fluorescence imaging of prostate cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 60, 71–78. 10.2967/jnumed.118.212720

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  SegalE.PrestwoodT. R.Van Der LindenW. A.CarmiY.BhattacharyaN.WithanaN.et al. (2015). Detection of intestinal cancer by local, Topical application of a quenched fluorescence probe for cysteine cathepsins. Chem. Biol. 22, 148–154. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.11.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  SextonK.TichauerK.SamkoeK. S.GunnJ.HoopesP. J.PogueB. W. (2013). Fluorescent affibody peptide penetration in glioma margin is superior to full antibody. PLoS ONE8:e60390. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060390

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  ShenZ.PrasaiB.NakamuraY.KobayashiH.JacksonM. S.McCarleyR. L. (2017). A near-infrared, wavelength-shiftable, turn-on fluorescent probe for the detection and imaging of cancer tumor cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1121–1132. 10.1021/acschembio.6b01094

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  SiddighiS.YuneJ. J.HardestyJ. (2014). Indocyanine green for intraoperative localization of ureter. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.211:e2. 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  SlooterM. D.HandgraafH. J. M.BoonstraM. C.van der VeldenL. A.BhairosinghS. S.QueI.et al. (2018). Detecting tumour-positive resection margins after oral cancer surgery by spraying a fluorescent tracer activated by gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase. Oral Oncol. 78, 1–7. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  SmithB. L.GaddM. A.LanahanC. R.RaiU.TangR.Rice-StittT.et al. (2018). Real-time, intraoperative detection of residual breast cancer in lumpectomy cavity walls using a novel cathepsin-activated fluorescent imaging system. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 171, 413–420. 10.1007/s10549-018-4845-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  SonnG. A.BehesnilianA. S.JiangZ. K.ZettlitzK. A.LepinE. J.BentolilaL. A.et al. (2016). Fluorescent image-guided surgery with an anti-Prostate Stem Cell Antigen (PSCA) diabody enables targeted resection of mouse prostate cancer xenografts in real time. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 1403–1412. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0503

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  SoonsP. A.De BoerA.CohenA. F.BreimerD. D. (1991). Assessment of hepatic blood flow in healthy subjects by continuous infusion of indocyanine green. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.32, 697–704.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  StangaP. E.LimJ. I.HamiltonP. (2003). Indocyanine green angiography in chorioretinal diseases: indications and interpretation: an evidence-based update. Ophtha110, 13–15. 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01563-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  SuganyaS. A. A.KochuraniK. J.NairM. G.LouisJ. M.SankaranS.RajagopalR.et al. (2016). TM1-IR680 peptide for assessment of surgical margin and lymph node metastasis in murine orthotopic model of oral cancer. Sci. Rep. 6:36726. 10.1038/srep36726

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  SunM. M.BeamK. S.CervenyC. G.HamblettK. J.BlackmoreR. S.TorgovM. Y.et al. (2005). Reduction-alkylation strategies for the modification of specific monoclonal antibody bisulfides. Bioconjug. Chem. 16, 1282–1290. 10.1021/bc050201y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  SunY.ZengX.XiaoY.LiuC.ZhuH.ZhouH.et al. (2018). Novel dual-function near-infrared II fluorescence and PET probe for tumor delineation and image-guided surgery. Chem. Sci. 9, 2092–2097. 10.1039/C7SC04774F

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  SzabóÁ.Szendi-SzatmáriT.Ujlaky-NagyL.RádiI.VerebG.SzöllosiJ.et al. (2018). The effect of fluorophore conjugation on antibody affinity and the photophysical properties of dyes. Biophys. J. 114, 688–700. 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  TaraziL.GeorgeA.PatonayG.StrekowskiL. (1998). Spectral characterization of a novel near-infrared cyanine dye: a study of its complexation with metal ions. Talanta46, 1413–1424. 10.1016/S0039-9140(98)00012-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  Terwisscha van ScheltingaA. G.van DamG. M.NagengastW. B.NtziachristosV.HollemaH.HerekJ. L.et al. (2011). Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence tumor imaging with vascular endothelial growth factor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeting antibodies. J. Nucl. Med. 52, 1778–1785. 10.2967/jnumed.111.092833

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  ToselandC. P. (2013). Fluorescent labeling and modification of proteins. J. Chem. Biol. 6, 85–95. 10.1007/s12154-013-0094-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  TringaleK. R.PangJ.NguyenQ. T. (2018). Image-guided surgery in cancer: a strategy to reduce incidence of positive surgical margins. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 10, 1–18. 10.1002/wsbm.1412

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  TsaiW. K.ZettlitzK. A.TavaréR.KobayashiN.ReiterR. E.WuA. M. (2018). Dual-modality immunoPET/fluorescence imaging of prostate cancer with an anti-PSCA Cys-minibody. Theranostics8, 5903–5914. 10.7150/thno.27679

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  TummersQ. R.HoogstinsC. E.GaarenstroomK. N.de KroonC. D.van PoelgeestM. I.VuykJ.et al. (2016). Intraoperative imaging of folate receptor alpha positive ovarian and breast cancer using the tumor specific agent. EC17 Oncotarget. 7:8282. 10.18632/oncotarget.8282

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  TummersQ. R.HoogstinsC. E.PetersA. A.De KroonC. D.TrimbosJ. B.Van De VeldeC. J.et al. (2015). The value of intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging based on enhanced permeability and retention of indocyanine green: feasibility and false-positives in ovarian cancer. PLoS ONE10:e0129766. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129766

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  TummersW. S.KimuraR. H.Abou-ElkacemL.BeinatC.VahrmeijerA. L.SwijnenburgR.-J.et al. (2018a). Development and preclinical validation of a cysteine knottin peptide targeting integrin αvβ6 for near-infrared fluorescent-guided surgery in pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. Clincanres24, 1667–1676. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2491

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  TummersW. S.MillerS. E.TeraphongphomN. T.GomezA.SteinbergI.HulandD. M.et al. (2018b). Intraoperative pancreatic cancer detection using tumor-specific multimodality molecular imaging. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 25, 1880–1888. 10.1245/s10434-018-6453-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  UeoH.ShindenY.ToboT.GamachiA.UdoM.KomatsuH.et al. (2015). Rapid intraoperative visualization of breast lesions with γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green. Sci. Rep. 5:12080. 10.1038/srep12080

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  UnkartJ. T.ChenS. L.WapnirI. L.GonzálezJ. E.HarootunianA.WallaceA. M. (2017). Intraoperative tumor detection using a ratiometric activatable fluorescent peptide: a first-in-human phase 1 study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 24, 3167–3173. 10.1245/s10434-017-5991-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  UranoY.SakabeM.KosakaN.OgawaM. (2011). Rapid cancer detection by topically spraying a γ-glutamyltranspeptidase - activated fluorescent probe. Cancer Imaging3:110ra119. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002823

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  Van BrusselA. S.AdamsA.VermeulenJ. F.OliveiraS.Van Der WallE.MaliW. P.et al. (2013). Molecular imaging with a fluorescent antibody targeting carbonic anhydrase IX can successfully detect hypoxic ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 140, 263–272. 10.1007/s10549-013-2635-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  van DamG. M.ThemelisG.CraneL. M. A.HarlaarN. J.PleijhuisR. G.KelderW.et al. (2011). Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-α targeting: first in-human results. Nat. Med. 17, 1315–1319. 10.1038/nm.2472

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  Van Der VorstJ. R.SchaafsmaB. E.HuttemanM.VerbeekF. P.LiefersG. J.HartgrinkH. H.et al. (2013). Near-infrared fluorescence-guided resection of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer119, 3411–3418. 10.1002/cncr.28203

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  van DrielP. B.BoonstraM. C.PrevooH. A.van de GiessenM.SnoeksT. J.TummersQ. R.et al. (2016). EpCAM as multi-tumour target for near-infrared fluorescence guided surgery. BMC Cancer16:884. 10.1186/s12885-016-2932-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  Van DrielP. B.Van Der VorstJ. R.VerbeekF. P.OliveiraS.SnoeksT. J.KeereweerS.et al. (2014). Intraoperative fluorescence delineation of head and neck cancer with a fluorescent Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor nanobody. Int. J. Cancer134, 2663–2673. 10.1002/ijc.28601

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  van KeulenS.van den BergN. S.NishioN.BirkelandA.ZhouQ.LuG.et al. (2019). Rapid, non-invasive fluorescence margin assessment: Optical specimen mapping in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral. Oncol. 88, 58–65. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  Van LeeuwenF.Valdés-OlmosR.BuckleT.Vidal-SicartS. (2016). Hybrid surgical guidance based on the integration of radionuclear and optical technologies. Br. J. Radiol. 89:20150797. 10.1259/bjr.20150797

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  van ManenL.HandgraafH. J. M.DianaM.DijkstraJ.IshizawaT.VahrmeijerA. L.et al. (2018). A practical guide for the use of indocyanine green and methylene blue in fluorescence-guided abdominal surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 118, 283–300. 10.1002/jso.25105

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  van OostenM.CraneL. M.BartJ.van LeeuwenF. W.van DamG. M. (2011). Selecting potential targetable biomarkers for imaging purposes in colorectal cancer using target selection criteria (TASC): a novel target identification tool. Transl. Oncol. 4, 71–82. 10.1593/tlo.10220

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  VeisehM.GabikianP.BahramiS. B.VeisehO.ZhangM.HackmanR. C.et al. (2007). Tumor paint: a chlorotoxin:Cy5.5 bioconjugate for intraoperative visualization of cancer foci. Cancer Res. 67, 6882–6888. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3948

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  VerbeekF. P.van der VorstJ. R.TummersQ. R.BoonstraM. C.de RooijK. E.LöwikC. W.et al. (2014). Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of both colorectal cancer and ureters using a low-dose integrin targeted probe. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 21, 528–537. 10.1245/s10434-014-3524-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  ViraS.MekhedovE.HumphreyG.BlankP. S. (2010). Fluorescent-labeled antibodies: balancing functionality and degree of labeling. Anal. Biochem. 402, 146–150. 10.1016/j.ab.2010.03.036

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  WalkerE.MannM.HondaK.VidimosA.SchluchterM. D.StraightB.et al. (2017). Rapid visualization of nonmelanoma skin cancer. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 76, 209–216.e9. 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.09.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  WangX.HuangS. S.HestonW. D.GuoH.WangB.-C.BasilionJ. P. (2014). Development of targeted near-infrared imaging agents for prostate cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 13, 2595–2606. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0422

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  WarramJ. M.De BoerE.KorbM.HartmanY.KovarJ.MarkertJ. M.et al. (2015). Fluorescence-guided resection of experimental malignant glioma using cetuximab-IRDye 800CW. Br. J. Neurosurg. 29, 850–858. 10.3109/02688697.2015.1056090

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  WarramJ. M.de BoerE.van DamG. M.MooreL. S.BevansS. L.WalshE. M.et al. (2016). Fluorescence imaging to localize head and neck squamous cell carcinoma for enhanced pathological assessment. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2, 104–112. 10.1002/cjp2.40

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  WatanabeR.SatoK.HanaokaH.HaradaT.NakajimaT.KimI.et al. (2014). Minibody-indocyanine green based activatable optical imaging probes: the role of short polyethylene glycol linkers. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 5, 411–415. 10.1021/ml400533y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  WayuaC.LowP. S. (2014). Evaluation of a cholecystokinin 2 receptor-targeted near-infrared dye for fluorescence-guided surgery of cancer. Mol. Pharm. 11, 468–476. 10.1021/mp400429h

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  WeisslederR.NtziachristosV. (2003). Shedding light onto live molecular targets. Nat. Med. 9, 123–128. 10.1038/nm0103-123

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  WhitleyM. J.CardonaD. M.LazaridesA. L.SpasojevicI.FerrerJ. M.CahillJ.et al. (2016). A mouse-human phase 1 co-clinical trial of a protease-activated fluorescent probe for imaging cancer. Sci. Transl. Med.8:320ra4-320ra4. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad0293

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  XenakiK. T.OliveiraS.van Bergen en HenegouwenP. M. P. (2017). Antibody or antibody fragments: implications for molecular imaging and targeted therapy of solid tumors. Front. Immunol.8:1287. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01287

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  XuH.BandariR. P.LeeL.LiR.YuP.SmithC. J.et al. (2018). Design, synthesis, and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of high affinity and specificity near-infrared fluorescent bombesin antagonists for tumor imaging. J. Med. Chem. 61, 7657–7670. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00614

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  YangL.SajjaH. K.CaoZ.QianW.BenderL.MarcusA. I.et al. (2014). uPAR-targeted optical imaging contrasts as theranostic agents for tumor margin detection. Theranostics4, 106–118. 10.7150/thno.7409

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  YangZ.UsamaS. M.LiF.BurgessK.LiZ. (2018). A Zwitterionic near-infrared dye linked TrkC targeting agent for imaging metastatic breast cancer. Medchemcomm9, 1754–1760. 10.1039/C8MD00190A

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  YiX.WangF.QinW.YangX.YuanJ. (2014). Near-infrared fluorescent probes in cancer imaging and therapy: an emerging field. Int. J. Nanomedicine9, 1347–1365. 10.2147/IJN.S60206

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  ZettlitzK. A.TsaiW. T. K.KnowlesS. M.KobayashiN.DonahueT. R.ReiterR. E.et al. (2018). Dual-modality immunoPET and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of pancreatic cancer using an anti-prostate cancer stem cell antigen (PSCA) cys-diabody. J. Nucl. Med. 59:1398–1405. 10.2967/jnumed.117.207332

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  ZettlitzK. A.WaldmannC. M.TsaiW. K.TavaréR.CollinsJ.MurphyJ. M.et al. (2019). A dual-modality linker enables site-specific conjugation of antibody fragments for 18 F-immunoPET and fluorescence imaging. J. Nucl. Med.10.2967/jnumed.118.223560. [Epub ahead of print].

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  ZhangH.DesaiP.KoikeY.HoughtonJ.CarlinS.TandonN.et al. (2017a). Dual-modality imaging of prostate cancer with a fluorescent and radiogallium-labeled gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist. J. Nucl. Med. 58, 29–35. 10.2967/jnumed.116.176099

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  ZhangM.KobayashiN.ZettlitzK. A.KonoE. A.YamashiroJ. M.TsaiW. K.et al. (2018). Near-infrared-dye labeled anti-prostate stem cell antigen minibody enables real-time fluorescence imaging and targeted surgery in translational mouse models. Clin. Cancer Res. 25:1382.2018. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1382

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  ZhangR. R.SchroederA. B.GrudzinskiJ. J.RosenthalE. L.WarramJ. M.PinchukA. N.et al. (2017b). Beyond the margins: real-time detection of cancer using targeted fluorophores. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14, 347–364. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.212

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  ZhuB.WuG.RobinsonH.WilganowskiN.HallM. A.GhoshS. C.et al. (2013). Tumor margin detection using quantitative NIRF molecular imaging targeting EpCAM validated by far red gene reporter iRFP. Mol. Imaging Biol.15, 560–568. 10.1007/s11307-013-0637-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  ZielinskiR.HassanM.LyakhovI.NeedleD.ChernomordikV.Garcia-GlaessnerA.et al. (2012). Affibody-dylight conjugates for in vivo assessment of HER2 expression by near-infrared optical imaging. PLoS ONE7:e41016. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar