Evaluation of Functionalized Spider Silk Matrices: Choice of Cell Types and Controls are Important for Detecting Specific Effects

The ideal scaffold for engineering and regeneration of tissues would be a replica of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which is unique for each tissue type. The scaffold should mimic the mechanical properties of the targeted tissue and serve as matrix for adhesion, growth, migration, and differentiation of endogenous and/or implanted cells. Recent research has highlighted the potential of targeting also the environment of the intermediate states that are formed during tissue repair, since progenitor cells that contribute to tissue formation in a regenerative niche exist in an environment that is different from the final tissue (e.g., the fracture callus that is formed during osteogenesis is softer than mature bone tissue) (Polo-Corrales et al., 2014). In addition, the scaffold should not evoke inappropriate immune responses and should be degradable. To improve cell interactions, ECM-derived cell-binding peptide motifs have been extensively used (Sengupta and Heilshorn, 2010; Maia et al., 2013).

For improving cell attachment to biomaterials, the RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptide motif is commonly used. This peptide is found in fibronectin, vitronectin, bone sialoprotein (BSP), and collagen VI and is recognized by the αvβ3 integrin (Arnaout et al., 2005). The RGD motif exhibits its full binding activity to integrins only when its mobility is restricted in a loop conformation, which can be accomplished in vitro by the incorporation of RGD in a cyclic peptide structure (Kumagai et al., 1991; Mohri et al., 1991). In contrast, if the RGD motif is flexible and lacks a stable conformation, it has a much lower affinity to the αvβ3 integrin (Pfaff et al., 1994).

RGD-based peptides have been covalently linked to homopolymers (Brandley and Schnaar, 1988; Kuo and Lauffenburger, 1993; Cook et al., 1997; Bolley et al., 2013), but also covalently incorporated in proteins produced in heterologous hosts, including spider silk-derived proteins (Bini et al., 2006; Wohlrab et al., 2012). Artificial spider silk made from recombinant proteins can form various two- and three-dimensional matrices that hold promise for culture of cells for tissue engineering (Bini et al., 2006; Wohlrab et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2014). These matrices are promising but to realize their full potential, they have to be assembled in a controlled and reproducible way. The recently determined physiological and molecular events that control spider silk formation (Andersson et al., 2014; Kronqvist et al., 2014) have made this realistic for the first time. Functionalization of the silk matrices with cell adhesion motifs via genetic engineering may be a great advantage of the material that likely allows incorporation of cues for adhesion of specific cells, but this has not been fully investigated.

Bini et al. compared films made from a recombinantly produced segment derived from the repetitive part of major ampullate spidroin (MaSp) from Nephila clavipes with or without an RGD motif incorporated, and analyzed Ca²⁺ deposition as a measure of cell response and human mesenchymal stem (hMSC) growth (Bini et al., 2006). The authors found that the matrix containing RGD did not show enhanced function as regard cell outcomes and speculated that the lack of RGD effect may be caused by insufficient exposure on the films. Wohlrab et al. studied growth of the cell line BALB/3T3 derived from mouse fibroblasts on films made from a recombinant protein segment from MaSp2 from Araneus diadematus (Wohlrab et al., 2012). RGD was either genetically incorporated into the silk protein, or added by linking a cyclic RGD peptide to Cys residues incorporated into the MaSp-derived protein. In both cases, adhesion and proliferation was improved compared to the wild-type protein as well as to a variant in which genetically incorporated RGD was replaced with RGE, a control motif, which binds significantly weaker to integrins. Widhe et al. reported that genetic incorporation of RGD into artificial silk, based on the minispidroin 4RepCT derived from Euprosthenops australis MaSp1, improved adherence and growth of human primary fibroblasts compared to 4RepCT films. Incorporation of the control motif RGE was reported to result in decreased attachment and about 50% slower growth rate compared to the RGD-4RepCT (Widhe et al., 2013). However, growth curves for RGD- and RGE-modified matrices were not analyzed.

Wu et al., in contrast, found that the RGD-4RepCT films did not improve attachment of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) compared to wild-type 4RepCT, while incorporation of RGD within the longer vitronectin-derived peptide motif PQVTRGDVFTM resulted in efficient hESC attachment and growth. The effect of the vitronectin-derived peptide motif required integrin binding to the RGD motif, as evidenced by a competition experiment (Wu et al., 2014). The differences between Wohlrab et al. and Widhe et al. on the one hand and Wu et al. on the other hand may depend on that hESC are demanding to culture in vitro, while cell lines and fibroblast are robust and will attach to and grow on a wide range of supports and matrices. To test this hypothesis, we performed the same experiments as in Widhe et al. but analyzed the growth curves for human primary fibroblasts on RGD- and RGE-containing films. Surprisingly, we found that human fibroblasts grow equally well on RGD- and RGE-functionalized 4RepCT films (Figure 1).

Figure 1

The different results as regard the functional importance of RGD incorporated into spider silk-derived matrices for cell culture described above suggest that care must be taken when evaluating different silk-derived biomaterials. The cells used for culture must certainly be chosen with respect to intended eventual applications of the material, but the robustness of the cells, in particular their sensitivity to growth conditions, must also be considered. Cell types that are more insensitive to culture conditions, like immortalized cell lines or fibroblasts, may be unsuitable for critical testing of novel biomaterials. It is also important to compare matrices that are functionalized with motifs with presumed biological effects, like RGD, with negative controls, as indirect effects of incorporating novel peptide segments, e.g., mediated by altered general properties of the biomaterial, cannot be excluded.

Statements