The Staphylococcus aureus Extracellular Adherence Protein Eap Is a DNA Binding Protein Capable of Blocking Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

Abstract

The extracellular adherence protein (Eap) of Staphylococcus aureus is a secreted protein known to exert a number of adhesive and immunomodulatory properties. Here we describe the intrinsic DNA binding activity of this multifunctional secretory factor. By using atomic force microscopy, we provide evidence that Eap can bind and aggregate DNA. While the origin of the DNA substrate (e.g., eukaryotic, bacterial, phage, and artificial DNA) seems to not be of major importance, the DNA structure (e.g., linear or circular) plays a critical role with respect to the ability of Eap to bind and condense DNA. Further functional assays corroborated the nature of Eap as a DNA binding protein, since Eap suppressed the formation of “neutrophil extracellular traps” (NETs), composed of DNA-histone scaffolds, which are thought to function as a neutrophil-mediated extracellular trapping mechanism. The DNA binding and aggregation activity of Eap may thereby protect S. aureus against a specific anti-microbial defense reaction from the host.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen and a major cause of acute, as well as, chronic skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) (Moet et al., 2007). A major threat of this bacterium is its ability to adhere and form large multicellular structures called biofilms on various implanted medical devices (O'Gara, 2007). Biofilm formation by S. aureus is a complex process that commonly includes the formation of an extracellular polymeric matrix including polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA), protein to protein interactions, and the incorporation of extracellular DNA (eDNA); which are all used by multiplying S. aureus cells to form and to remain within the multilayered structure (O'Gara, 2007; Payne and Boles, 2016). β-hemolysin has been identified as a factor that can bind to eDNA (Huseby et al., 2010), however, this exotoxin is not produced by most clinical S. aureus isolates due to the insertion of a prophage into the β-hemolysin encoding hlb gene (Goerke et al., 2009).

Another S. aureus factor which may serve as binding partner for eDNA on the bacterial surface is extracellular adherence protein (Eap), a member of the “secretable expanded repertoire adhesive molecules” (SERAM) protein family (Chavakis et al., 2005). This basic protein is expressed by S. aureus in a growth phase-dependent manner (Joost et al., 2009), and secreted in large quantities into the extracellular milieu (Eisenbeis et al., 2017), from which it partially rebinds to the bacterial surface through the surface-bound neutral phosphatase (Nptase) and other yet unidentified cell wall molecules (Palma et al., 1999; Flock and Flock, 2001).

Secreted Eap has been shown to interact with a number of host cell matrix components, plasma proteins, and cellular receptors with a binding preference for extracellular cell matrix (ECM) super-structures (Hansen et al., 2006). Eap demonstrated function as a potent anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic factor (Chavakis et al., 2007). This multifunctional protein is also involved in biofilm formation under iron-limiting conditions (Johnson et al., 2008) or in the presence of serum (Thompson et al., 2010), however, its molecular function in biofilm formation of S. aureus remains largely unknown. Depending on the S. aureus strain background, this cationic protein consists of four to six similar, but not identical, repeats of about 100 amino acid residues each; these are designated EAP modules, which are connected by short 9–12 residues long linker regions (Hammel et al., 2007).

Binding of Eap to multiple soluble and extracellular matrix host ligands is thought to support the adhesion of S. aureus to host tissue, particularly in the context of inflammation and wounding (Hansen et al., 2006; Bur et al., 2013). Moreover, our preliminary experiments indicated that Eap might also interact with extracellular nucleic acids (RNA and DNA), thereby providing another targeted binding of S. aureus to sites of host cell injury and stress (Dumont, 1959; Gould et al., 2015). An important biological setting in which S. aureus may encounter large quantities of eDNA are neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Upon stimulation by invading pathogens and/or other stimuli, activated neutrophils may enter a cell-death program, in which nuclear, granular, and plasma membranes dissolve in an ordered manner, thereby releasing decondensed chromatin, decorated with granular proteins, into the extracellular space in order to entrap the invading microorganisms (Papayannopoulos and Zychlinsky, 2009; Azzouz et al., 2018). S. aureus may counteract this process by several means: the pathogen secretes Eap to block the activities of neutrophil serine proteases (Stapels et al., 2014), which are of major importance for NET formation (Stapels et al., 2015), and it also provides extracellular nucleases to degrade NETs (Berends et al., 2010).

Given, (i) the elongated structure of Eap with several surface-exposed binding sites, capable of participating in the interactions with diverse ligands (Hammel et al., 2007), (ii) its cationic charge in neutral solutions, (iii) its adhesive properties, and (iv) the fact that Eap is highly expressed in serum grown S. aureus biofilms (Thompson et al., 2010), we hypothesized that Eap might contribute to binding of bacteria to eDNA. By applying atomic force microscopy (AFM), we demonstrate here for the first time that Eap specifically binds to linearized DNA, aggregates this type of nucleic acid, and thereby is capable of interfering with NETosis by a novel mechanism.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and Eap preparations

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. S. aureus strains were routinely grown on Trypticase Soy Agar II with 5% Sheep Blood (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) at 37°C. E. coli strains were grown on Luria Bertani agar (Becton Dickinson), supplemented with 25 μg/ml kanamycin when needed. Eap was collected and purified from S. aureus strain Newman and its nuc1 nuc2 derivative M0746N1 (Kaito et al., 2011) as described in Athanasopoulos et al. (2006) with the following modifications: S. aureus strains were grown in Modified B-Broth (Ohlsen et al., 1997) for 20 h at 37°C and 150 rpm with a culture to flask volume of 1:4. Cell suspensions were centrifuged at 5.525 × g and 4°C for 15 min, and cell pellets were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS pH 7.2; Thermo Fisher, Dreieich, Germany). Cell wall associated proteins were subsequently obtained by lithium chloride extraction, and the extracts adsorbed onto SP Sepharose (Amersham-Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany). After stepwise elution with increasing NaCl concentrations, pooled eluted fractions were sterile filtered and further purified by cation exchange chromatography on a Mono S 5/50 GL column (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, German) followed by gel filtration using a Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column (Sigma-Aldrich) operated on a BioLogic DuoFlow chromatography system (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). Protein concentrations and purity of the products were checked by SDS-PAGE and Bradford assay, respectively. Purified Eap samples were found to be free of detectable endotoxin. Eap and the Eap homologs EapH1 and EapH2 of Mu50 were additionally produced recombinant as His-tagged proteins in Escherichia coli and purified by using nickel affinity chromatography as described in Geisbrecht et al. (2005), Xie et al. (2006).

DNA sources

Herring sperm DNA (10164142), phage lambda DNA (D3779), and pBR322 (N3033L) DNA were purchased from Invitrogen (Karlsruhe, Germany), Sigma-Aldrich, and New England Biolabs (Frankfurt, Germany), respectively. To test the influences of a circular or linear state of DNA, and the nature of the DNA end on degradation by Eap, pBR322 was digested with the restriction enzymes BamHI, EcoRV, and PstI (Thermo Fisher), respectively, following the instructions of the manufacturer. The 1.4-kb DNA fragment was amplified by PCR using primer pair MBH492 (5′-CCTGAACAACCTGATGAGCC-3′)/MBH493 (5′-ACCCTATTTTTTCGCCAAGCC-3′), and chromosomal DNA from S. aureus strain Newman (Duthie, 1952) as template.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

Fifty Nanogram of DNA (a 1.4-kb DNA fragment amplified by PCR using primer pair MBH492/MBH493 and chromosomal DNA from S. aureus strain Newman) was co-incubated with increasing concentrations of Eap (0, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 μg/ml; 0, 16, 80, 160, 320, and 640 nM) in PBS for 5 min at 37°C. Subsequently, DNA/Eap solutions were mixed 5:1 (v/v) with loading buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 0.15% orange G, 60% glycerol] supplemented with 1 μl of a 1:100 dilution of SYBR® Gold nucleic acid gel stain (S11494; Invitrogen), and immediately subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis as described in Sambrook and David (2001). Gel images were recorded with the Gel Doc™ XR+ gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany), and band intensities determined using the ImageLab software package 4.0.1 (Bio-Rad). The GeneRuler™ 1 kb DNA ladder (SM0311; Thermo Fisher) served as DNA size marker.

DNase activity assays

To analyze the DNA degrading capacity of Eap, a number of DNase assays were performed. At first, the DNase-Activity ELISA ORG 590 (ORGENTEC Diagnostika, Mainz, Germany) was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. In brief, 3 μg/ml of Eap were diluted 1:10 with sample buffer prior to the assay. To each well, 100 μl of calibrators, controls and pre-diluted Eap were added and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After several washings, 100 μl of the enzyme conjugate solution including a DNase substrate antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was added and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Wells were washed again three times with wash solution, before the HRP substrate 3,3′,5,5′- tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was added. After 15 min of incubation, the reaction was stopped and the optical density was read at 450 nm. The result was calculated using a bi-chromatic measurement with a reference at 600–690 nm. PCR grade water served as negative control, and 12.5 mKunitz units (mKuU) of DNase I served as positive control.

In a second assay, 50 ng of DNA (a 1.4-kb DNA fragment amplified by PCR using primer pair MBH492/MBH493 and chromosomal DNA from S. aureus strain Newman) was co-incubated with different concentrations of Eap (10, 20, and 40 μg/ml) in RPMI 1640 (Thermo Fisher) for 30 min at 37°C. Additionally, 50 ng of DNA was mixed with DNase I (0.4 mKuU) and co-incubated for 5, 15, and 30 min at 37°C, respectively. Subsequently, DNA/Eap and DNA/DNase I solutions were mixed with one volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1; Thermo Fisher), vortexed and centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 × g. The DNA containing upper phases were carefully removed and mixed 5:1 (v/v) with loading buffer, and immediately subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. Gels were subsequently incubated for 15 min in a 1x SYBR® Gold nucleic acid gel stain solution as described by the manufacturer, and gel images were recorded with the Gel DocTM XR+ gel documentation system.

Finally, the fluorescence based DNase detection kit (Jena Biosciences, Jena, Germany) was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Briefly, a master mix containing a dual labeled fluorescent DNase probe (a 27 bp oligonucleotide labeled at its 5′-end with fluorescein and its 3′-end with the quencher BHQ-1®), reaction buffer, and ROX® reference dye was mixed with Eap (10 and 40 μg/ml) and different amounts of a DNase I standard (2 and 0.2 mKuU), respectively. Solutions were placed into a real time fluorescence reader (Abi 7000; ThermoFisher) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Fluorescence signals at 520 and 601 nm were recorded after every minute, and FAM-signals were evaluated in relation to the ROX reference signals.

Preparation of the substrate for DNA combing

Silicon (Si) wafers were used as substrates since they feature a very low roughness (0.09 nm) and are easily available in consistently good quality with a known surface chemistry. Si wafers (Siltronic AG, Burghausen, Germany) have a native silicon oxide layer (d = 1.7 nm). The wafers were rendered hydrophobic by self-assembly of a CH₃ terminated monolayer of octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) molecules following a standard protocol (Lessel et al., 2015). Hydrophobized Si wafers displayed a surface roughness of 0.12 nm and an advancing (receding) water contact angle of 111° (107°).

DNA combing

Molecular combing of DNA was performed according to the following procedure: A chemically modified CH3 terminated silicon wafer was immersed into a PBS/DNA solution (100 ng/ml DNA dissolved in PBS) with 0.5 μg/ml Eap added followed by a 5 min incubation time at room temperature. DNA fibers bind to the chemically modified, hydrophobic surface by one or both of their ends in a pH-dependent manner (Allemand et al., 1997). The wafer was then pulled out perpendicular with a slow and constant speed (v = 300 μm/s) using a xyz-axis motor-drive manipulator (MM-92B, Narashige Group, Tokyo, Japan). The receding meniscus stretches the anchored DNA molecules onto the hydrophobic surface as it applies a constant force on them. This rapid process results in irreversibly fixed DNA fibers and has the major advantage that DNA fibers are aligned in parallel on the surface. The stretching factor is constant (2 kb ~ 800 nm).

AFM measurements

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was carried out in air on a Bioscope Catalyst (Bruker, France), operating in ScanAsyst® mode using ScanAsyst-Air cantilevers (nominal spring constant 0.5 N/m, Bruker, France) and a tip velocity <5 μm/s. The images were processed and DNA length measured using the open source Gwyddion Software (Version 2.36). SigmaPlot11 (Systat Software GmbH, Erkrath, Germany) was used for length histogram generation.

Human neutrophil isolation

Isolation of human neutrophils was conducted according to a previously published protocol (Saffarzadeh et al., 2012). Briefly, venous blood was collected from healthy donors in EDTA tubes and layered onto a double gradient that was formed by layering an equal volume of histopaque-1077 over histopaque-1119 (Sigma-Aldrich). Following centrifugation at 700 × g for 30 min, the granulocyte fraction was concentrated at the 1077/1119 interphase. These cells were aspirated and washed once with PBS. The remaining erythrocytes in that fraction were subsequently lysed by hypotonic shock using distilled water, and neutrophils were resuspended in phenol red-free RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen).

Immunofluorescence microscopy

1 × 10⁵ neutrophils were seeded onto coverslips in 8-chamber slides (Nunc, Thermo Scientific, Germany) and treated with 25 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, Sigma-Aldrich), lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from Escherichia coli 0111:B4 (Sigma-Aldrich), and spermine–nitric oxide complex (NO) (Sigma Aldrich), respectively, to induce NET-formation. Subsequently, cells were challenged with increasing concentrations of Eap (0, 1, 2.5, and 10 μg/ml) or DNase I (10 U/ml; Thermo Fisher), and incubated for 3 h at 37°C in presence of 5% CO₂. In a second approach, neutrophils were pre-incubated for 2 h with PMA prior to the addition of Eap for 1 h. To visualize NETs, samples were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde, blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and incubated with primary mouse anti-DNA/histone H1 antibody (Millipore, Germany) followed by detection with secondary antibody coupled to Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen). The DNA/histone antibody has a very high affinity for decondensated chromatin in NETs in comparison to 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Saffarzadeh et al., 2012, 2014). DAPI (Invitrogen) was used for nuclear DNA detection. Slides were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen). Cell images were taken with a fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and NETs were quantified based on the area of DNA/histone antibody derived signals per 100 cells detected by DAPI, using the imaging software Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012).

Evaluation of apoptosis and necrosis

In order to investigate whether Eap may induce cell death in neutrophils, the PromoKine Apoptotic/Necrotic/Healthy Cells Detection Kit (PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) was used. Neutrophils were incubated for 3 h with Eap (10 or 20 μg/ml), and the percentage of apoptosis and necrosis was evaluated using FITC-Annexin, Ethidium homodimer III, and Hoechst 33342 according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistics

Statistical significance was assessed using the GraphPad Prism software package 6.01. p values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results and discussion

Eap binds to DNA

The broad binding capacity of Eap and its cationic charge in solution (pI = 9.93 at pH 7.2) suggests that this bacterial exoprotein might also bind to (poly-) anionic molecules such as DNA. To test this hypothesis, we first incubated a defined amount of a 1.4-kbp DNA-PCR fragment (50 ng) with increasing concentrations of Eap (0, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 μg/ml or 0, 16, 80, 160, 320, and 640 nM, respectively), and subjected the mixtures to agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE). This analysis revealed a clear shift in the mobility of the DNA bands in the presence of Eap (Figure 1A), which completely prevented the migration of DNA into the gel at Eap concentrations ≥20 μg/ml. Thus, these findings indicate the formation of large DNA-protein aggregates, very likely due to binding of Eap to DNA. Moreover, densitometric evaluation of band intensities of separated DNA samples after AGE displayed a dose-dependent decrease in signal intensities in the presence of Eap (Figure 1B), indicating a partial loss of intact DNA during the separation on AGE. In controls, neither a shift in the mobility of DNA nor a clear drop in DNA amounts were seen when proteinase K-digested Eap (640 nM) or recombinant versions of the monomeric Eap homologs EapH1 and EapH2 (800 nM) were used (Figure S1).

Figure 1

Eap binds to DNA but does not degrade DNA

The partial decrease of the DNA signal after AGE with increasing concentrations of Eap indicated that this secreted bacterial protein might also exhibit some intrinsic DNase activity. To test this hypothesis, the influence of Eap on DNA was assayed with different DNase activity assays (Figure 2). At first, the DNase activities of different Eap (3 μg/ml) preparations, purified from strain Newman (New), its nuc1 nuc2 derivative M0746N1, or as a recombinant protein from E. coli (rMu50), were quantified using a commercial immunometric enzyme immunoassay (Figure 2A). Similar to the positive control (12.5 mKuU of DNase I), clear decreases in absorbance rates at 450 nm were observed for all three Eap preparations, indicating that Eap might indeed possess some DNase activity or that this bacterial protein blocks the adhesion of the HRP-conjugated anti DNase substrate antibody to its target. Usage of the Eap preparation of the nuc1 nuc2 derivative M0746N1 ruled out that this putative DNase activity may originate from a carry-over of S. aureus nucleases Nuc1 and Nuc2 in the Eap preparation obtained from strain Newman.

Figure 2

However, when 50 ng of the 1.4-kbp DNA-PCR fragment utilized for the EMSA were incubated with the Newman Eap preparation (10, 20, and 40 μg/ml) for 30 min at 37°C, and protein contents of the mixtures were subsequently removed by phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol treatment prior to AGE, neither a decrease in DNA size nor a significant reduction in DNA amount was noticed (Figure 2B). In contrast, 0.4 mKuU of DNase I almost completely degraded the DNA probe in this period of time.

Next, the Eap preparations were tested with a commercial fluorescence based DNase activity assay (Figure 2C). Here, no relevant increase in fluorescence at 520 nm was observed with any of the Eap preparations, when compared to the negative control (PCR grade water), indicating that Eap did not degrade the FAM/BHQ-1 labeled oligonucleotide probe. In contrast, incubation of the dual labeled DNase probe with DNase I yielded increased fluorescence signals at this wavelength in a dose- and time-dependent manner.

Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that Eap has no apparent DNase activity and that the decrease in DNA content observed in the EMSA might be due to a partial binding of Eap-DNA complexes to the walls of the reaction tubes. The supposed DNase activity of Eap suggested by the immunometric enzyme immunoassay probably originated from a blocking of the DNase substrate by Eap, which prevented the binding of the HRP-conjugated anti-DNase substrate antibodies to the DNase substrate.

Eap binds to linearized DNA and mediates aggregation of DNA

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was applied on DNA-Eap samples to foster the previous observations obtained with EMSA. Since its invention in 1985 (Binnig et al., 1986), AFM has repeatedly been shown in interaction analysis and size determinations to provide superior resolution capabilities on various length scales, from large tissue samples (Graham et al., 2010), to single cells and bacteria (Müller and Dufrêne, 2011; Loskill et al., 2014), down to the molecular level (Oesterhelt et al., 1999). Previously, DNA-protein complexes were already successfully recorded by AFM imaging on numerous occasions (Bezanilla et al., 1994; Abdelhady et al., 2003; Bennink et al., 2003; Hamon et al., 2007; Pastré et al., 2010; Shlyakhtenko et al., 2013; Lyubchenko et al., 2014). To this end, purified Eap was initially deposited on an octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) terminated silicon surface (Figure 3), followed by protein size evaluation. In the size distribution histograms two peaks with heights of 6 ± 1 nm and 11 ± 1 nm, respectively, and widths of the adhered proteins of about 20 nm and 80 nm were observed (Figures 3B,C). These results indicate that isolated Eap was present as a mixture of monomers and multimers with a molar ratio of 14:1. This is in line with a previous observation reporting Eap to be present predominantly as a monomer in solution that adopts an extended conformation (Hammel et al., 2007).

Figure 3

In the next step, different DNA/Eap mixtures were pre-incubated for 5 min at 37°C in PBS and subsequently spotted onto OTS terminated silicon surfaces, followed by analysis with AFM in the ScanAsyst® mode (Figure 4). Binding of Eap to one or both ends of linear DNA fragments (Phage Lambda DNA, PCR product, PstI digested plasmid pPR322) was observed, whereas Eap bound rarely to circular DNA (pBR322) (Figures 4A–D, Figure S2), indicating a binding preference of Eap for open DNA ends. The nature of the DNA ends (blunt or sticky) appeared not to be of major importance, as pBR322 samples digested by PstI (producing a sticky end with a 3′-overhang), by BamHI (producing a sticky end with a 5′-overhang), or by EcoRV (producing a blunt end) were bound by Eap with comparable efficiencies (Figure S3). However, binding of sheared herring sperm DNA as a eukaryotic DNA source to Eap presents a different picture (Figure 4E). Indeed, Eap was frequently found to bind to this sheared herring sperm DNA on other positions than the fragments termini, potentially at DNA nicks caused by the shearing process. In addition, Eap tended to cross-link DNA-strands (green arrows, Figure 4E, Figure S2D) thereby forming a superstructure, in line with the previous EMSA-based findings, indicating that high concentrations of Eap promote the formation of large protein-DNA aggregates (see Figure 1A).

Figure 4

In order to determine the fate of such DNA-Eap complexes, DNA (100 ng/ml) was incubated with Eap (0.5 μg/ml) for different periods of time, and the DNA-protein samples were subsequently deposited onto the OTS terminated silicon surface using a combing technique (Allemand et al., 1997) that spreads the DNA fragments onto the surface in a highly ordered fashion (Figure 5A). DNA length measurements revealed a mean size of about 420 nm for the yielded PCR DNA product in the absence of Eap, which is in agreement with the reported values suggesting a length of 0.3 nm per base pair and a stretch rate of 105–120% (Bensimon et al., 1994). Moreover, cross sections of Eap-bound DNA revealed heights of 2 nm for the DNA fragment and 5–6 nm for DNA bound Eap molecules in most of the cases (Figure 5B and Figure S4). However, when the 1.4-kb PCR DNA fragment was incubated with Eap for increasing periods of time, a continuous decrease in DNA length over time was found (Figures 5C–E). Along with this, heights of the Eap-DNA complexes increased to 22 ± 5 nm after 30 min of co-incubation (Figure S4). These observations strongly indicate that Eap not only binds to DNA but also mediates its aggregation.

Figure 5

Eap aggregates neutrophil-derived NETs

Next, in order to test the DNA aggregation capacity of Eap in another biological context, its ability to interact with neutrophil-derived NETs was evaluated (Figure 6). In the absence of agents that may induce neutrophil stimulation, Eap alone did not promote necrosis or apoptosis of neutrophils (Figure 6A). However, following induction of neutrophils by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) to trigger the production of extracellular DNA/histone complexes, denoted “neutrophil extracellular traps” (NETs), co-incubation with isolated Eap resulted in a dose-dependent diminution of such networks, documented by the loss of the characteristic staining pattern of NETs (Figures 6B,C). Instead, increased staining rates were observed at the cell surfaces and/or the nuclei of stimulated neutrophils in the presence of Eap, suggesting the presence of larger aggregates of decondensed DNA in these regions (Figure 6B). Moreover, Eap also markedly reduced the formation of NETs when neutrophils were activated by other stimuli such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or a nitric oxide (NO) donor (Figure 7).

Figure 6

Figure 7

Together, these data indicate that Eap contains a DNA binding capacity that interferes with the formation of natural extracellular DNA structures such as NETs independent of the stimulus for neutrophil-related NETosis.

Eap can alter preformed NETs

S. aureus is known to secrete at least two heat stable endonucleases, termed Nuc1 and Nuc2 (Tang et al., 2008) that, like Eap, are expressed in a SaeRS-dependent manner and are primarily produced during the later stages of bacterial growth (Harraghy et al., 2005; Olson et al., 2013). To confirm the specificity of Eap's intrinsic DNA aggregation activity and to exclude that the decreased number of NETs observed in the presence of isolated Eap was caused by a contamination with such nucleases, we also challenged NETs with purified Eap from the S. aureus Newman derivative M0746N1 (Kaito et al., 2011), lacking both nucleases. Both Eap samples were tested in parallel experiments, whereby each Eap sample was added to the neutrophils 2 h post induction of NETosis by PMA (Figure 8). Importantly, both Eap preparations were able to decrease the area covered by preformed NETs (Figure 8B). Together, these findings strongly indicate that Eap not only interferes with NET formation but can also modulate the stability of preformed NETs, and that this NET interfering capacity of Eap was not due to contamination with nucleases.

Figure 8

Conclusions

The secreted adhesive protein Eap of S. aureus is a multifunctional protein that exerts a number of immunomodulatory functions (Chavakis et al., 2005), particularly with regard to protection of bacteria against host defense machineries. These include inhibition of leukocyte recruitment to the site of infection, anti-angiogenic function to block revascularization of wounds or protease inhibition (Chavakis et al., 2007). Here, we present a novel activity of isolated Eap, documented by its ability to bind to DNA and to modulate the formation and stability of NETs.

In particular, our data indicates that Eap preferentially binds to the termini of linearized DNA and expresses an intrinsic DNA aggregation activity. This DNA binding activity of Eap appears to be compatible with Eap's functions to protect S. aureus against NET-mediated extracellular trapping (Menegazzi et al., 2012; Azzouz et al., 2018). Together with its recently described activity as neutrophil serine protease inhibitor in association with NET functions (Stapels et al., 2014), Eap possesses another property as a DNA aggregation factor to prevent extracellular trapping by this important host defense mechanism. Finally, NETs are considered to be a primary component of arterial and venous thrombi and thereby help to capture circulating bacteria to prevent their dissemination into tissue (Massberg et al., 2010). Conversely, due to its NET-aggregation capacity, Eap may thereby protect bacteria from being trapped in microthrombi, allowing them to continue their infectious process in the body.

References

• 1

  AbdelhadyH. G.AllenS.DaviesM. C.RobertsC. J.TendlerS. J. B.WilliamsP. M. (2003). Direct real-time molecular scale visualisation of the degradation of condensed DNA complexes exposed to DNase I. Nucleic Acids Res.31, 4001–4005. 10.1093/nar/gkg462

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AllemandJ. F.BensimonD.JullienL.BensimonA.CroquetteV. (1997). pH-dependent specific binding and combing of DNA. Biophys. J.73, 2064–2070. 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78236-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AthanasopoulosA. N.EconomopoulouM.OrlovaV. V.SobkeA.SchneiderD.WeberH.et al. (2006). The extracellular adherence protein (Eap) of Staphylococcus aureus inhibits wound healing by interfering with host defense and repair mechanisms. Blood107, 2720–2727. 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3140

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AzzouzL.CherryA.RiedlM.KhanM.PlutheroF. G.KahrW. H. A.et al. (2018). Relative antibacterial functions of complement and NETs: NETs trap and complement effectively kills bacteria. Mol. Immunol.97, 71–81. 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.02.019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BenninkM. L.NikovaD. N.Van Der WerfK. O.GreveJ. (2003). Dynamic imaging of single DNA–protein interactions using atomic force microscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta479, 3–15. 10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01571-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  BensimonA.SimonA.ChiffaudelA.CroquetteV.HeslotF.BensimonD. (1994). Alignment and sensitive detection of DNA by a moving interface. Science265, 2096–2098. 10.1126/science.7522347

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  BerendsE. T.HorswillA. R.HasteN. M.MonestierM.NizetV.Von Kockritz-BlickwedeM. (2010). Nuclease expression by Staphylococcus aureus facilitates escape from neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Innate Immun.2, 576–586. 10.1159/000319909

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BezanillaM.DrakeB.NudlerE.KashlevM.HansmaP. K.HansmaH. G. (1994). Motion and enzymatic degradation of DNA in the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J.67, 2454–2459. 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80733-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  BinnigG.QuateC. F.GerberC. (1986). Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 930–933. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BurS.PreissnerK. T.HerrmannM.BischoffM. (2013). The Staphylococcus aureus extracellular adherence protein promotes bacterial internalization by keratinocytes independent of fibronectin-binding proteins. J. Invest. Dermatol.133, 2004–2012. 10.1038/jid.2013.87

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  ChavakisT.PreissnerK. T.HerrmannM. (2007). The anti-inflammatory activities of Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Immunol.28, 408–418. 10.1016/j.it.2007.07.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  ChavakisT.WiechmannK.PreissnerK. T.HerrmannM. (2005). Staphylococcus aureus interactions with the endothelium: the role of bacterial “secretable expanded repertoire adhesive molecules” (SERAM) in disturbing host defense systems. Thromb. Haemost.94, 278–285. 10.1160/TH05-05-0306

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  DumontA. E. (1959). Wound healing and extracellular desoxyribosenucleic acid. Ann. Surg.150, 799–807. 10.1097/00000658-195911000-00003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  DuthieE. S. (1952). Variation in the antigenic composition of staphylococcal coagulase. J. Gen. Microbiol.7, 320–326. 10.1099/00221287-7-3-4-320

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  EisenbeisJ.PeiskerH.BackesC. S.BurS.HoltersS.ThewesN.et al. (2017). The extracellular adherence protein (Eap) of Staphylococcus aureus acts as a proliferation and migration repressing factor that alters the cell morphology of keratinocytes. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.307, 116–125. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.01.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  FlockM.FlockJ. I. (2001). Rebinding of extracellular adherence protein Eap to Staphylococcus aureus can occur through a surface-bound neutral phosphatase. J. Bacteriol.183, 3999–4003. 10.1128/JB.183.13.3999-4003.2001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  GeisbrechtB. V.HamaokaB. Y.PermanB.ZemlaA.LeahyD. J. (2005). The crystal structures of EAP domains from Staphylococcus aureus reveal an unexpected homology to bacterial superantigens. J. Biol. Chem.280, 17243–17250. 10.1074/jbc.M412311200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  GoerkeC.PantucekR.HoltfreterS.SchulteB.ZinkM.GrumannD.et al. (2009). Diversity of prophages in dominant Staphylococcus aureus clonal lineages. J. Bacteriol.191, 3462–3468. 10.1128/JB.01804-08

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  GouldT. J.LysovZ.LiawP. C. (2015). Extracellular DNA and histones: double-edged swords in immunothrombosis. J Thromb Haemost13(Suppl 1), S82–S91. 10.1111/jth.12977

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  GrahamH. K.HodsonN. W.HoylandJ. A.Millward-SadlerS. J.GarrodD.ScothernA.et al. (2010). Tissue section AFM: in situ ultrastructural imaging of native biomolecules. Matrix Biol.29, 254–260. 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.01.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  HammelM.NemecekD.KeightleyJ. A.ThomasG. J.Jr.GeisbrechtB. V. (2007). The Staphylococcus aureus extracellular adherence protein (Eap) adopts an elongated but structured conformation in solution. Protein Sci.16, 2605–2617. 10.1110/ps.073170807

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  HamonL.PastréD.DupaigneP.BretonC. L.CamE. L.PiétrementO. (2007). High-resolution AFM imaging of single-stranded DNA-binding (SSB) protein—DNA complexes. Nucleic Acids Res.35, e58–e58. 10.1093/nar/gkm147

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  HansenU.HussainM.VilloneD.HerrmannM.RobenekH.PetersG.et al. (2006). The anchorless adhesin Eap (extracellular adherence protein) from Staphylococcus aureus selectively recognizes extracellular matrix aggregates but binds promiscuously to monomeric matrix macromolecules. Matrix Biol.25, 252–260. 10.1016/j.matbio.2006.01.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  HarraghyN.KormanecJ.WolzC.HomerovaD.GoerkeC.OhlsenK.et al. (2005). sae is essential for expression of the staphylococcal adhesins Eap and Emp. Microbiology151, 1789–1800. 10.1099/mic.0.27902-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  HusebyM. J.KruseA. C.DigreJ.KohlerP. L.VockeJ. A.MannE. E.et al. (2010). Beta toxin catalyzes formation of nucleoprotein matrix in staphylococcal biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 14407–14412. 10.1073/pnas.0911032107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  JohnsonM.CockayneA.MorrisseyJ. A. (2008). Iron-regulated biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus Newman requires ica and the secreted protein Emp. Infect. Immun.76, 1756–1765. 10.1128/IAI.01635-07

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  JoostI.BlassD.BurianM.GoerkeC.WolzC.Von MullerL.et al. (2009). Transcription analysis of the extracellular adherence protein from Staphylococcus aureus in authentic human infection and in vitro. J. Infect. Dis.199, 1471–1478. 10.1086/598484

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  KaitoC.HiranoT.OmaeY.SekimizuK. (2011). Digestion of extracellular DNA is required for giant colony formation of Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Pathog.51, 142–148. 10.1016/j.micpath.2011.04.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  LesselM.BäumchenO.KlosM.HählH.FetzerR.PaulusM.et al. (2015). Self-assembled silane monolayers: an efficient step-by-step recipe for high-quality, low energy surfaces. Surface Interf. Analysis47, 557–564. 10.1002/sia.5729

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  LoskillP.PereiraP. M.JungP.BischoffM.HerrmannM.PinhoM. G.et al. (2014). Reduction of the peptidoglycan crosslinking causes a decrease in stiffness of the Staphylococcus aureus cell envelope. Biophys. J.107, 1082–1089. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  LyubchenkoY. L.GallA. A.ShlyakhtenkoL. S. (2014). Visualization of DNA and protein-DNA complexes with atomic force microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol.1117, 367–384. 10.1007/978-1-62703-776-1_17

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  MassbergS.GrahlL.Von BruehlM. L.ManukyanD.PfeilerS.GoosmannC.et al. (2010). Reciprocal coupling of coagulation and innate immunity via neutrophil serine proteases. Nat. Med.16, 887–896. 10.1038/nm.2184

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  MenegazziR.DeclevaE.DriP. (2012). Killing by neutrophil extracellular traps: fact or folklore?Blood119, 1214–1216. 10.1182/blood-2011-07-364604

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  MoetG. J.JonesR. N.BiedenbachD. J.StilwellM. G.FritscheT. R. (2007). Contemporary causes of skin and soft tissue infections in North America, Latin America, and Europe: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998–2004). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.57, 7–13. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.05.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  MüllerD. J.DufrêneY. F. (2011). Atomic force microscopy: a nanoscopic window on the cell surface. Trends Cell Biol.21, 461–469. 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  OesterheltF.RiefM.GaubH. E. (1999). Single molecule force spectroscopy by AFM indicates helical structure of poly(ethylene-glycol) in water. New J. Phys.1:6. 10.1088/1367-2630/1/1/006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  O'GaraJ. P. (2007). ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.270, 179–188. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00688.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  OhlsenK.KollerK. P.HackerJ. (1997). Analysis of expression of the alpha-toxin gene (hla) of Staphylococcus aureus by using a chromosomally encoded hla::lacZ gene fusion. Infect. Immun.65, 3606–3614.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  OlsonM. E.NygaardT. K.AckermannL.WatkinsR. L.ZurekO. W.PallisterK. B.et al. (2013). Staphylococcus aureus nuclease is an SaeRS-dependent virulence factor. Infect. Immun.81, 1316–1324. 10.1128/IAI.01242-12

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  PalmaM.HaggarA.FlockJ. I. (1999). Adherence of Staphylococcus aureus is enhanced by an endogenous secreted protein with broad binding activity. J. Bacteriol.181, 2840–2845.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  PapayannopoulosV.ZychlinskyA. (2009). NETs: a new strategy for using old weapons. Trends Immunol.30, 513–521. 10.1016/j.it.2009.07.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  PastréD.HamonL.SorelI.Le CamE.CurmiP. A.PietrementO. (2010). Specific DNA-protein interactions on mica investigated by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir26, 2618–2623. 10.1021/la902727b

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  PayneD. E.BolesB. R. (2016). Emerging interactions between matrix components during biofilm development. Curr. Genet.62, 137–141. 10.1007/s00294-015-0527-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  SaffarzadehM.Cabrera-FuentesH. A.VeitF.JiangD.Scharffetter-KochanekK.GilleC.et al. (2014). Characterization of rapid neutrophil extracellular trap formation and its cooperation with phagocytosis in human neutrophils. Discoveries2:e19. 10.15190/d.2014.11

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  SaffarzadehM.JuenemannC.QueisserM. A.LochnitG.BarretoG.GaluskaS. P.et al. (2012). Neutrophil extracellular traps directly induce epithelial and endothelial cell death: a predominant role of histones. PLoS ONE7:e32366. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032366

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  SambrookJ.DavidW. R. (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual.Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 47

  SchindelinJ.Arganda-CarrerasI.FriseE.KaynigV.LongairM.PietzschT.et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  ShlyakhtenkoL. S.GallA. A.LyubchenkoY. L. (2013). Mica functionalization for imaging of DNA and protein-DNA complexes with atomic force microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol.931, 295–312. 10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_14

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  StapelsD. A.GeisbrechtB. V.RooijakkersS. H. (2015). Neutrophil serine proteases in antibacterial defense. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.23, 42–48. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  StapelsD. A.RamyarK. X.BischoffM.Von Kockritz-BlickwedeM.MilderF. J.RuykenM.et al. (2014). Staphylococcus aureus secretes a unique class of neutrophil serine protease inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111, 13187–13192. 10.1073/pnas.1407616111

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  TangJ.ZhouR.ShiX.KangM.WangH.ChenH. (2008). Two thermostable nucleases coexisted in Staphylococcus aureus: evidence from mutagenesis and in vitro expression. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.284, 176–183. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01194.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  ThompsonK. M.AbrahamN.JeffersonK. K. (2010). Staphylococcus aureus extracellular adherence protein contributes to biofilm formation in the presence of serum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.305, 143–147. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01918.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  XieC.AlcaideP.GeisbrechtB. V.SchneiderD.HerrmannM.PreissnerK. T.et al. (2006). Suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by extracellular adherence protein of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Exp. Med.203, 985–994. 10.1084/jem.20051681

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar