Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

This article is part of the Research Topic

Landslide Hazard in a Changing Environment

Original Research ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Earth Sci. | doi: 10.3389/feart.2018.00089

Evaluating the differences of gridding techniques for Digital Elevation Models generation and their influence on the modeling of stony debris flows routing: A case study from Rovina di Cancia basin (North-eastern Italian Alps)

  • 1Dipartimento Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy

Debris flows are among the most hazardous phenomena in mountain areas. To cope with debris flow hazard, it is common to delineate the risk-prone areas through routing models. The most important input to debris flow routing models are the topographic data, in the form of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). The quality of the DEMs depends on the accuracy, density, and spatial distribution of the sampled points; on the characteristics of the surface; and on the gridding method used to obtain them. Therefore, the choice of the DEMs interpolation method affects the realistic representation of the channel and fan morphology, and thus reasonably the debris flow routing modeling outcomes. In this paper, we initially investigate the performance of common interpolation methods (i.e. linear triangulation, natural neighbour, nearest neighbour, inverse distance to a power, ANUDEM, Radial Basis Functions, and ordinary kriging) in building DEMs with the complex topography of a debris flow channel located in the Venetian Dolomites (North-eastern Italian Alps), by using small footprint full-waveform Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) data. The investigation is carried out through a combination among statistical analysis of vertical accuracy, algorithm robustness, and spatial clustering of vertical errors, and multi-criteria shape reliability assessment. After that, we examine the influence of the tested interpolation algorithms on the performance of a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based cell model for simulating stony debris flows. In detail we investigate both the correlation between the DEMs heights uncertainty resulting from the gridding procedure and that on the corresponding simulated erosion/deposition depths, both the effect of interpolation algorithms on simulated areas, erosion and deposition volumes, solid-liquid discharges, and channel morphology after the event. The comparison among the tested interpolation methods highlights that the ANUDEM and ordinary kriging algorithms are inadequate in building DEMs with complex topography. Conversely, the linear triangulation, the natural neighbour algorithm, and the thin-plate spline plus tension and completely regularized spline functions ensure the best trade-off among accuracy and shape reliability. Anyway, the evaluation of the effects of gridding techniques on debris flow routing modeling reveals that the choice of the interpolation algorithm does not significantly affect the model outcomes.

Keywords: Digital elevation models (DEMs), Interpolation algorithms, interpolation algorithms comparison, Full-waveform LiDAR, LiDAR data accuracy assessment, DEMs accuracy assessment, Stony debris flow, Routing modeling

Received: 16 Mar 2018; Accepted: 15 Jun 2018.

Edited by:

Davide Tiranti, Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale (ARPA), Italy

Reviewed by:

Guy J. Schumann, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Milad Janalipour, K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Iran  

Copyright: © 2018 Boreggio, Bernard and Gregoretti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: MD. Mauro Boreggio, Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali, Viale dell'Università, 16, 35020, Legnaro, Padova, 35020, Veneto, Italy, mauro.boreggio@gmail.com