In the published article, a citation of “Wang and Zhu, 2010” was erroneously missed. The citation has now been added in the caption of Figure 4. The updated caption can be seen below.
“FIGURE 4 | (A) Clinopyroxene is densely disseminated or presents as veinlets near the contact zone; (B) Magnetite is sparsely disseminated; (C) Magnetite veinlets; (D) Clinopyroxene is metasomatized by epidote + chlorite + magnetite, and epidotization and chloritization in the outer contact zone are well developed; (E–I) Alteration of quartz + magnetite + K-feldspar + calcite + sericite + chlorite + prehnite + actinolite + chalcopyrite + pyrite are developed in the hydrothermal stage; (F,G) Quartz-magnetite vein with a width of about 2∼10 cm, where magnetite accounts for as much as 40 vol.% of the vein volume; (J) Chalcopyrite is disseminated and magnetite is metasomatized by hematite; (K,L) Coarse K-feldspar grain, with inclusions of diopside formed in the early stage; (M) The calcite vein formed in the latest stage cuts through the early-stage magnetite; (N) Malachite in magnetite-quartz vein; (O) Wall rock of andesite is intensely mineralized with magnetite. Plane polarized light (A,E, M,O), cross polarized light (B–D,G–I,K,L,N), reflected light (J), BSE image (F). Ab—albite; Adr—andradite; Cal—calcite; Ccp—chalcopyrite; Chl—chlorite; Czo—clinozoisite; Di—diopside; Ep—epidote; Gl—glass; Hem—hematite; Mal—malachite; Mt—magnetite; Kfs—K-feldspar; Qtz—quartz; Sa—salite; Ser—sericite (modified after Wang and Zhu, 2010).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
skarn, magnetite, syenite, Sawur, island arc, Fe-Cu deposit
Citation
Yang S, Zhou Q-S, Wang R and Zhu Y (2022) Corrigendum: Qia’erdunbasixi Fe-Cu deposit in Sawur, Xinjiang: A case study of skarn deposit hosted by volcanic rock. Front. Earth Sci. 10:981906. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.981906
Received
29 June 2022
Accepted
04 July 2022
Published
04 August 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited and reviewed by
Hassan Mirnejad, Miami University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Yang, Zhou, Wang and Zhu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rui Wang, rw@cugb.edu.cn; Yongfeng Zhu, yfzhu@pku.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Economic Geology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.