Abstract
Biochar application has been suggested as a strategy to decrease nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils while increasing soil C stocks, especially in tropical regions. Climate change, specifically increasing temperatures, will affect soil environmental conditions and thereby directly influence soil N2O fluxes. Here, we show that Miscanthus giganteus biochar applied at high rates suppresses the typical warming-induced stimulation of N2O emissions. Specifically, in experiments with high biochar addition (25 Mg ha−1), N2O emissions under 40°C were equal to or even lower compared to those observed at 20°C. In this sense, the mitigation potential of biochar for N2O emissions might increase under the auspices of climate change.
Introduction
Biochar is the product of biomass pyrolysis and has been applied to the soil with the purpose of improving soil quality and increasing soil carbon (C) stocks, especially in tropical regions. Furthermore, biochar may also have the potential to decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially nitrous oxide (N2O) (Matuštík et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Among the GHGs, N2O has received special attention because it remains in the atmosphere for more than 114 years and has a warming potential 298 times >CO2, with N fertilization in agricultural lands as one of its main sources (Reay et al., 2012). N2O is formed by microbial N turnover processes, not only by the reductive process of denitrification but also by the oxidative process of nitrification (Venterea and Rolston, 2000), and thus, its production is dependent not only on substrate availability and oxidative status of soils, which may be affected by biochar, but also by temperature. Biochar addition may affect N2O emissions by changing soil ammonium and nitrate concentrations (Liang et al., 2006; Cheng et al., 2008), decreasing soil bulk density (Karhu et al., 2011), facilitating N2O consumption in the terminal step of denitrification (Aamer et al., 2020), and adding labile carbon and nitrogen compounds to the soil (Spokas and Reicosky, 2009).
In a global meta-analysis, it was observed that biochar application significantly decreased soil N2O emissions by on average 38%. The application rate was identified as the most influential variable affecting the mitigation potential of biochar applications to soils (Zhang et al., 2020). Recent review studies show that N2O production is significantly reduced with biochar application rates of 1–2% by weight (Cayuela et al., 2014; Kammann et al., 2017). A decrease in N2O emissions ranging between 21 and 92% was reported in four contrasting soils compared to untreated controls, with the mitigation potential strongly increasing with increasing biochar additions (1–20% by weight) (Stewart et al., 2013). An 80–88% reduction in N2O efflux was also found when 5, 10, and 20 g kg−1 biochar was applied to soil with and without added manure (Rogovska et al., 2011). Such variable responses of N2O reduction might be due to differences in characteristics of the biochar, soils, or prevailing environmental conditions (Kammann et al., 2017).
Climate change, specifically increasing temperatures, will affect soil environmental conditions and thereby directly influence soil N2O fluxes. Under temperate conditions, a 2-year field study found that biochar-warming interactions led to higher total N2O emissions than the control (Bamminger et al., 2017). According to the authors, the observed stimulation of soil N2O emissions in warmed biochar plots may be due to the (i) reduction of the nitrate sorption capacity of biochar by soil warming; (ii) stimulation of soil organic matter mineralization under warming, which increases the amount of available C and N in the soil and at the same time results in lowered soil oxygen concentration due to the stimulation of soil respiration, thereby creating anaerobic zones for denitrification; (iii) increases in soil moisture by biochar application due to the increased water-holding capacity of soils, especially under dry conditions; and (iv) changes in the microbial community because of soil warming and biochar application.
Considering the potential of biochar application for mitigating GHG emissions in tropical regions (Rittl et al., 2015), the influence of expected increases in temperature on the N2O emissions of biochar-amended soils requires investigation, mainly in a scenario of climate change. Specifically, little information is available on the interactive response of tropical soil N2O emissions to temperature changes and biochar addition rates (Bamminger et al., 2017). Consequently, we deployed a laboratory experiment targeted to investigate the changes in the N2O emissions from N-fertilized biochar-amended soils, as affected by elevated temperature and biochar addition rates.
Materials and Methods
Biochar and Soil Characteristics
Biochar was produced from Miscanthus giganteus grass. The biomass was dried at ~125°C in a reactor and then carbonized at 450°C for 15 min (Mimmo et al., 2014). The chemical characteristics of biochar used in this study are presented in Supplementary Table S1. Soil was collected from the top layer (0–20 cm) under a native Atlantic Rain Forest patch in Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil (22°90′74″ S; 48°24′01″ W). The soil was classified as an Entisol Quartzipsamment (USDA, 2014), sandy (7.8% clay, 2.2% silt, and 90% sand), with pH in H2O of 3.9, total C of 0.86%, and 0.06% of total N at the 0–20-cm layer.
Experimental Design
To evaluate the effect of biochar amendment rates on N2O emissions from N-fertilized soil, an 88-day incubation experiment was performed using an existent experiment (Rittl et al., 2020). Shortly, the previous experiment was carried on with half-liter incubation jars filled with 100 g of soil and amended with biochar at various application rates (0, 0.24, 0.48, and 0.96 g of biochar, respectively, and 0, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 Mg ha−1) and subsequently preincubated at 20°C or 40°C in a full factorial design (n = 3 each). After 144 days, the experiment was finished, and our study started by adding in each jar 0.132 g of NH4NO3, which corresponded to a surface application of 90 kg N ha−1, and N2O measurements started for a period of 88 days. Soil moisture was adjusted to 60% field capacity and maintained at that level throughout the experiment.
Measurements of N2O Efflux
Emissions of N2O were determined daily for the first 15 days, two to three times per week for the next 25 days, and weekly for the next 48 days (Supplementary Figure S1). Gas emissions were determined by taking gas samples at time 0 and 32 min after jars were gas-tightly closed with a plastic syringe of 20 ml. Gas emissions in the 24 jars were measured sequentially. Gas samples were injected in a gas chromatograph (SRI GC8610, Torrance, CA, USA) equipped with an electron capture detector (ECD) for quantification of N2O, with helium carrier gas. The oven temperature and temperatures of the ECD were set to 72 and 325°C, respectively. The N2O emissions were calculated on a per gram basis considering the concentration difference between time 0 and 32 min and the headspace volume (Abbruzzini et al., 2017).
Data Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using Assistat 7.7 and Origin 8.5 (OriginLab, Co.). The data were checked for normality and homogeneity of variances to meet the assumptions of ANOVA. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed on JASP 0.8.6.0 to test the effects of biochar rate and temperature on mean N2O daily emissions. A paired-samples t-test was conducted to compare daily mean N2O emissions from the treatments.
Results
We observed that Miscanthus biochar addition significantly suppressed N2O emissions (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S2; P < 0.001). The mean N2O daily emissions from untreated soil were higher (0.071–0.216 μg N2O g−1 dry soil) than those from biochar-treated soils (0.09–0.164 μg N2O g−1 dry soil). In our study, incubation at warmer temperatures significantly increased mean N2O daily emissions not only in untreated soils but also in soils with low biochar application rates (6.25 and 12.5 Mg ha−1) by 332 and 150%, respectively (Figure 1). However, in experiments with high biochar addition (25 Mg ha−1), N2O emissions under 40°C were equal to or even lower compared to those observed at 20°C (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Discussion
Miscanthus biochar application decreased the N2O emissions from a N-fertilized tropical soil (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S2). This finding is in agreement with other studies and the general understanding of biochar effects on soil N2O emission and has been explained by an “electron shuttle” effect that biochar might play during the denitrification process, facilitating N2O reduction to dinitrogen (N2) (Cayuela et al., 2014). The application of biochar from hardwood trees in sandy loam soil at a rate of 28 Mg ha−1 suppressed 91% of the total N2O emissions (Case et al., 2012). Under controlled conditions, the combined application of 30 Mg ha−1 of Miscanthus biochar pyrolyzed at 600°C and N-rich litter resulted in a reduction of 42% in N2O emissions (Bamminger et al., 2014).
Soil warming has been shown to increase N2O emissions through stimulation of or shifts in the microbial community responsible for N cycling (Cantarel et al., 2012). Furthermore, warming might increase soil anaerobiosis and thus N2O emissions derived from denitrification as a consequence of increased soil respiration (Butterbach-Bahl et al., 2013). However, N2O emissions from Miscanthus biochar-treated tropical sandy soils were always lower than those from untreated soils at both incubation temperatures (Figure 1). With increasing biochar addition rate, biochar addition may have counteracted these temperature-mediated shifts, possibly by reducing nitrogen availability (Liang et al., 2006; Cheng et al., 2008) and/or promoting N2O reduction to the terminal denitrification product N2 (Aamer et al., 2020). Interestingly, in our study with a higher biochar addition rate, the temperature-induced stimulation of N2O emissions completely diminished, as also confirmed by the significant interaction between temperature and biochar effects (Supplementary Table S2). This shows that biochar at high application rates (25 Mg ha−1) fully hampers the typical increase in soil N2O emissions with rising temperatures. We hypothesize that this effect is due to the observed biochar-promoted reduction of N2O to N2 in soils, i.e., before its emission to the atmosphere (Butterbach-Bahl et al., 2013).
Our findings provide empirical evidence about the role of biochar in mitigating N2O emissions from N fertilization under warming conditions, a contentious issue in agricultural lands of tropical regions, mainly in a scenario of climate change. In a tropical sandy soil, doubled incubation temperature resulted in several-fold increased N2O emissions, an effect that diminished the highest Miscanthus biochar addition rates. This indicates that biochar effects on N2O reduction to N2 in soils increase with increasing temperatures and that at biochar application rates of 25 Mg ha−1, the typical temperature-induced stimulation of N2O emission can be avoided. In summary, Miscanthus biochar offset warming effects on N2O emissions in a tropical sandy soil, and the mitigating results of biochar are strongest at high biochar rates and high temperatures. This might explain the high mitigation potential of N2O in tropical soils reported here and could indicate that the potential of biochar to mitigate N2O emissions will increase with global warming.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
TR: conceptualization, experimentation, sampling and lab analysis, data analysis, writing—original draft, and writing–review and editing. DO: writing—review and editing. LC: experimentation, sampling and lab analysis. ES, KB-B, and MD: conceptualization, writing—review and editing. CC: conceptualization, supervision, and writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; 404150/2013-6). TR was grateful to São Paulo Research Foundation for supporting her post-doctoral scholarship (FAPESP; 2015/10108-9).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2020.611873/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AamerM.ShaabanM.HassanM. U.GuoqinH.YingL.YingT. H.et al. (2020). Biochar mitigates the N2O emissions from acidic soil by increasing the nosZ and nirK gene abundance and soil pH. J. Environ. Manage.255:109891. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109891
2
AbbruzziniT. F.ZeneroM. D. O.AndradeP. A. M.AndreoteF. D.CampoJ.CerriC. E. P. (2017). Effects of biochar on the emissions of greenhouse gases from sugarcane residues applied to soils. Agric. Sci.08, 869–886. 10.4236/as.2017.89064
3
BammingerC.PollC.MarhanS. (2017). Offsetting global warming-induced elevated greenhouse gas emissions from an arable soil by biochar application. Glob. Chang. Biol.24, 318–334. 10.1111/gcb.13871
4
BammingerC.ZaiserN.ZinsserP.LamersM.KammannC.MarhanS. (2014). Effects of biochar, earthworms, and litter addition on soil microbial activity and abundance in a temperate agricultural soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils50, 1189–1200. 10.1007/s00374-014-0968-x
5
Butterbach-BahlK.BaggsE. M.DannenmannM.KieseR.Zechmeister-BoltensternS. (2013). Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls?Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.368:20130122. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0122
6
CantarelA. A. M.BloorJ. M. G.PommierT.GuillaumaudN.MoirotC.SoussanaJ. F.et al. (2012). Four years of experimental climate change modifies the microbial drivers of N2O fluxes in an upland grassland ecosystem. Glob. Chang. Biol.18, 2520–2531. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02692.x
7
CaseS. D. C.McNamaraN. P.ReayD. S.WhitakerJ. (2012). The effect of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil—The role of soil aeration. Soil Biol. Biochem.51, 125–134. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.017
8
CayuelaM. L.Van ZwietenL.SinghB. P.JefferyS.RoigA. (2014). Biochar's role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.191, 5–16. 10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.009
9
ChengC. H.LehmannJ.EngelhardM. H. (2008). Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta72, 1598–1610. 10.1016/j.gca.2008.01.010
10
KammannC.CayuelaM. L.VascoP.HerrikoE.KammannC.IppolitoJ.et al. (2017). Biochar as a tool to reduce the agricultural greenhouse-gas burden—knowns, unknowns, and future research needs. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag.25, 114–139. 10.3846/16486897.2017.1319375
11
KarhuK.MattilaT.BergströmI.ReginaK. (2011). Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity—results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.140, 309–313. 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.005
12
LiangB.LehmannJ.SolomonD.KinyangiJ.GrossmanJ.O'NeillB.et al. (2006). Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.70, 1719–1730. 10.2136/sssaj2005.0383
13
MatuštíkJ.HnátkováT.KočíV. (2020). Life cycle assessment of biochar-to-soil systems: a review. J. Clean. Prod.259:120998. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120998
14
MimmoT.PanzacchiP.BaratieriM.DaviesC. A.TononG. (2014). Effect of pyrolysis temperature on miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus) biochar physical, chemical, and functional properties. Biomass Bioenerg.62, 149–157. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.004
15
ReayD. S.DavidsonE. A.SmithK. A.SmithP.MelilloJ. M.DentenerF.et al. (2012). Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Nat. Clim. Change2, 410–416. 10.1038/nclimate1458
16
RittlT. F.ArtsB.KuyperT. W. (2015). Biochar: an emerging policy arrangement in Brazil?Environ. Sci. Policy51, 45–55. 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.010
17
RittlT. F.CanisaresL.SagriloE.Butterbach-BahlK.DannenmannM.CerriC. E. P. (2020). Temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition varies with biochar application and soil type. Pedosphere30, 334–340. 10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60013-3
18
RogovskaN.LairdD.CruseR.FlemingP.ParkinT.MeekD. (2011). Impact of biochar on manure carbon stabilization and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.75, 871–879. 10.2136/sssaj2010.0270
19
SpokasK. A.ReicoskyD. C. (2009). Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Ann. Environ. Sci.3, 179–193. Available online at: www.aes.northeastern.edu
20
StewartC. E.ZhengJ.BotteJ.CotrufoM. F.CollinsF.PlateauL.et al. (2013). Co-generated fast pyrolysis biochar mitigates green-house gas emissions and increases carbon sequestration in temperate soils. GCB Bioenergy5, 153–164. 10.1111/gcbb.12001
21
USDA (2014). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Spokane Valley, WA: USDA—Natural Resources Conservation Service.
22
VentereaR. T.RolstonD. E. (2000). Mechanisms and kinetics of nitric and nitrous oxide production during nitrification in agricultural soil. Glob. Change Biol. 6, 303–316. 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00309.x
23
ZhangQ.XiaoJ.XueJ.ZhangL. (2020). Quantifying the effects of biochar application on greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils: a global meta-analysis. Sustainability12:3436. 10.3390/su12083436
Summary
Keywords
greenhouse gases, black C, fertilizers, Miscanthus giganteus, climate change
Citation
Rittl TF, Oliveira DMS, Canisares LP, Sagrilo E, Butterbach-Bahl K, Dannenmann M and Cerri CEP (2021) High Application Rates of Biochar to Mitigate N2O Emissions From a N-Fertilized Tropical Soil Under Warming Conditions. Front. Environ. Sci. 8:611873. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.611873
Received
29 September 2020
Accepted
04 December 2020
Published
13 January 2021
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Maria Luz Cayuela, Spanish National Research Council, Spain
Reviewed by
Kurt A. Spokas, United States Department of Agriculture, United States; Jinyang Wang, Nanjing Agricultural University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Rittl, Oliveira, Canisares, Sagrilo, Butterbach-Bahl, Dannenmann and Cerri.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dener M. S. Oliveira dener.oliveira@ifgoiano.edu.br
This article was submitted to Soil Processes, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.