In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 8 as published.
FIGURE 8
In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 8 as published. Due to the error in Figure 8D, reference to the particle image should be removed.
The original legend is:
“Average number concentration observed by (A) aircraft, (B) OTT disdrometer; Normalization size spectra observed by (C) aircraft (right are particle images by CPI), (D) OTT disdrometer (right are particle images by microscope) from 1630 BJT to 1705 BJT 27 Jan 2021.”
The corrected legend appears below.
“Average number concentration observed by (A) aircraft, (B) OTT disdrometer; Normalization size spectra observed by (C) aircraft (right are particle images by CPI), (D) OTT disdrometer from 1630 BJT to 1705 BJT 27 Jan 2021.”
In the original article, there was an error in Discussions, paragraph five. Due to the error in Figure 8D, the original paragraph five should be removed. The original paragraph to be removed appears below:
“The ground (about −9°C) images (Figure 8D right, observed by microscope) showed that the snowflakes were also transparent and regular, revealing that the water vapor was scarce in lower altitudes. The snowflake shape showed mainly hexagonal plates, and had little rimed dendrites, which was also consistent with previous observations (Hou et al., 2014; Chang et al., 2019). It is reflected that snowflake growth mechanism was relatively simple in lower altitudes; most snowflakes increased by aggregation process, and there was basically no agglutination or clustering process in snowflake growth (Taylor et al., 2016).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
Beijing mountains snowfall, ground-based disdrometer, aircraft platform, vertical structure, comprehensive observation
Citation
Huang Y, Zhao D, Du Y, Chen Y, Zhang L, Li X and Jing Y (2022) Corrigendum: Vertical Structure of a Snowfall Event Based on Observations From the Aircraft and Mountain Station in Beijing. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:850113. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.850113
Received
07 January 2022
Accepted
08 February 2022
Published
01 March 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Junke Zhang, Southwest Jiaotong University, China
Reviewed by
Zixia Liu, King’s College London, United Kingdom
Dawei Hu, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Huang, Zhao, Du, Chen, Zhang, Li and Jing.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Delong Zhao, zhaodelong@bj.cma.gov.cn; Yuanmou Du, yuanmoudu24@163.com
This article was submitted to Atmosphere and Climate, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.