Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 08 July 2022
Sec. Nutrition and Food Science Technology
This article is part of the Research Topic Adaptation of Traditional Crop Cultivars to Climate Change in Terms of Nutritional Aspects View all 5 articles

Assessment of the Volatile Profiles and Identification of Differentiating Aromas of Wild Undervalued Plants

  • 1Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Laboratorio de Fitoquímica y Productos Biológicos, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
  • 2Instituto de Conservación y Mejora de la Agrobiodiversidad Valenciana, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain

Wild edible plants have played an important role in traditional diets, including the Mediterranean diet. Many of these plants have acquired an undervalued status, since they are under-appreciated in terms of their nutritional, organoleptic qualities, or their seasonality. However, some of these species are still used in local gastronomy for their aromatic and taste characteristics. This study has investigated the quantitative and qualitative aromatic characteristics of seven undervalued wild plants that determine their organoleptic characteristics. Volatiles of the fresh leaves of each species have been determined by head-space solid-phase microextraction, a sensitive and solvent-free technique, coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. A total of 37 compounds with remarkable quantitative and qualitative differences were identified. In general, benzenoids and monoterpenoids were the most abundant groups, while branched unsaturated hydrocarbons, fatty alcohols, and sesquiterpenoids were the minor groups. Benzyl nitrile, benzyl isothiocyanate, p-cymene, and 2-hexenal were the main individual volatiles, while benzyl alcohol, eugenol, and α-copaene were the differentiating aromas. The results display that the undervalued species studied could be a suitable choice to include as new environmentally friendly crops, providing a double benefit to producers, because they are a possible way to achieve sustainable production systems, and they are an alternative for consumers, because these plants provide flavors that have high organoleptic qualities.

Introduction

Many wild edible plants are characteristic of their seasonality, and local populations value these plants for their organoleptic properties. Traditionally, in the Mediterranean area, wild plants are used as food sources and condiments in the preparation of local dishes, for their aroma and flavor imparted by volatile constituents. They are well adapted to local growth conditions due to their resistance to climatic changes, which can be useful for alternative sustainable crops that bring new flavors and aromas. Furthermore, wild plants are very rich in fiber, minerals, vitamins, polyphenols, and antioxidants (13). Several studies confirm the nutritional and functional quality of wild plants, which is why they are appreciated in regional cuisines (46). The ways of using the plants depend on local traditions: They can be used fresh (salads) or cooked (soups and stews); alone or in combination with other species (710).

These diverse Mediterranean food traditions are part of the intangible cultural heritage that must be preserved in the face of modern lifestyles and a poorly differentiated diet (11, 12). Safeguarding traditional culinary knowledge could help reduce food poverty in the current climate emergency, promoting food security and increasing the value of local resources, as well as diversifying diets that are beneficial for health. When used fresh, the most useful parts of the plant are the leaves and flowers, which stand out because of their organoleptic characteristics. These characteristics include the visual appearance, the textures, and the aromatic profile, the main sensory attributes by which wild edible plants are valued. In general, the taste and smell continue to be powerful determinants of food selection, and consumers rank these elements as their main reason for choosing a food (13). The principal constituents of the sensory profiles are volatile compounds that enhance aroma and flavor, having a considerable impact as quality parameters and consumer preferences (14). Among the factors that influence the concentration of these volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are the genetic diversity of species and environmental conditions (15). All plants emit volatile compounds that are species-specific and are involved in certain ecological interaction, providing adaptative characteristics under strong environmental selection (14, 16, 17). Volatile compounds are synthesized mainly by chemical or enzymatic pathways, accumulating in plant organs such as leaves (18), flowers (19), or fruit (20). Currently, more than 1,700 volatile compounds have been identified from more than 90 plant families, constituting approximately 1% of all known plant secondary metabolites (21, 22). Each volatile compound is characterized by an odor threshold, so even if the qualitative composition of different samples is almost the same, the aroma may vary when relative proportions are dissimilar (23).

The differentiating aroma of each plant makes them attractive for harvesting and depends on the season. The wide varieties of volatile aromatic constituents are usually studied with principal attention given to antimicrobial and antioxidant activity, among other things (22, 2428). Besides this, the review article by Goto et al. (29) highlights that the consumption of several wild plants also provides improvements in certain conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular diseases, because they contain many bioactive phytochemicals, especially terpenoids. These phytochemicals constitute some of the largest families of natural products that have a beneficial effect on health. Therefore, the relationship between diet and health could be considered a fundamental factor for healthy nutrition and well-being, while the aromatic profile could act as a stimulus for this synergy (13, 30). In addition, supported by broad health benefits, interest in this area continues to help to identify undervalued species as potential crop sources, as they may represent an underexploited source of new sustainable crops (31, 32).

Despite extensive culinary uses, there is little information on the aroma compounds of wild edible plants that add organoleptic quality to food sources. Determination of these volatile compounds from wild edible species has acquired momentum in recent years, mainly due to their bioactivities that remain intact when consumed fresh. The identification of certain constituents could make it possible to establish the qualitative indicators of the organoleptic characteristics and the optimal state of harvest of the undervalued species. According to (33), these selected plants have cultural relevance and are deeply rooted in the traditional cuisine of the Valencian coast. As far as we know, there are few works describing these characteristics, and we have not found any report analyzing the volatile profiles of the wild edible plants described in this study. For this reason, the focus has been on highlighting the organoleptic value of these species. More specifically, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the aromatic profiles of seven undervalued edible plants that form part of biocultural diversity and regional culinary traditions (34). To meet this global objective, the research process was (a) to select the undervalued edible plant species potentially used for consumption in the study area according to seasonality; (b) to identify the organoleptic matrix, such as the volatile profiles, to find the differentiating aroma and flavor characteristics of each species; and (c) to recognize qualitative–quantitative differences and similarities between the volatile profiles. The plants selected in the study were Portulaca oleracea L. and Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cass., which relate to the spring–summer season; Stellaria media (L.) Vill, Tropaeolum majus L., Sonchus oleraceus L., Chenopodium album L., and Diplotaxis erucoides (L.) DC relate to the autumn–winter season. Their volatile profiles were evaluated by the combined techniques of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and integrated gas chromatography by a mass spectrophotometer (GC-MS). This technique was chosen for not involving temperatures that affect the stability of volatile compounds and allowing the unalterable metabolites of the aromatic profiles to be known.

The identification of the volatiles in the seven undervalued plants is intended to be a precedent to assist advances in the inclusion of these plants in cuisines, as an alternative to conventional vegetables, to diversify the intake of a balanced and healthy diet. At the same time, identification of the volatile compounds could provide a better understanding of the organoleptic effect on the particular flavor of each species with a wide presence in the corresponding season and promote traditional gastronomy. This study may also guide the future commercial exploitation of these species, not only as alternative food sources and crops in agronomic innovations, but also as an aid in making informed decisions on the collection and standardization of quality parameters.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

The seven edible undervalued plants were selected as plant material from different botanical families. The species corresponded to the wild population and were collected during two growing seasons in 2020. The replicates harvested were collected on the same day, expanding the geographic diversity but not the temporal one, so as not to include new variables in the study. The aerial parts of fresh samples were visually inspected before sampling, and only intact and healthy plants were collected, with the assistance of the Ecological Cooperative in the rural environment areas of the coast of the province of Valencia (Spain). The area is located within 39°45'13” North and 0°12′21″West, with SCI code ES0000148 (35). A brief description of each plant is summarized in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Botanical families and a brief description of the seven wild edible species selected for study.

The undervalued species with abundance in their respective season appear spontaneously and present as weeds. Samples of these fresh plants were manually cleaned to remove soil particles, and whole leaves were selected for analysis.

Sample Preparation

The extraction of volatile compounds without the addition of solvents has been successfully used in plant materials. Groups of plant material (leaves) of each species were collected, chopped, and stored at −80°C prior to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry as independent biological replicates. About 1.5 mg of each leaf sample was introduced into a hermetically sealed 22 mL vial, and it was incubated at 40°C for 30 min.

Extraction of Volatiles

Isolation of volatile constituents was performed by a head-space solid-phase microextraction (HS/SPME) technique. SPME Fiber Assembly, 65 μm PDMS/DVB Stableflex (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA), was used to collect and concentrate the aroma compounds. Before the samples were loaded, the fiber was inserted into a GC injector (270°C) and held for 1 h, according to (36). After a 40 min equilibration period at 40°C, the fiber was inserted into the incubated vial splitless mode at 250°C for 30 s in the gas chromatograph injection port.

Volatile Profile Analysis

The analysis of volatiles was performed by 6890 N gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS), networked to a 59,73 Inert Mass Selective Detector (Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, CA, USA). The analytical conditions were as follows: stationary phase HP-5MS J&W silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. x 0.25 μm thickness film; 5%-phenyl-95% methylpolysiloxane); helium carried gas at a constant flow of 1 mL·min−1; transfer line was maintained at 220°C. Initial temperature (40°C) was maintained for 1 min, Ramp 1 from 5°C min−1 up to 200°C for 1 min−1, and Ramp 2 from 15°C min−1 up to 250°C for 3 min. The electron impact mode with ionization energy of 70 eV (source temperature 225°C) was used for detection by the mass spectrometer, and the acquisition was performed in scan mode (mass range m/z 35–350 amu). MSD ChemStation E.02.02.1431 (Agilent Technologies) was used to perform chromatograms and mass spectra. Fiber cleaning between samples was 5 min at 250°C.

Determination of Volatiles

The identification of volatiles took place by combining two different aspects: a comparison of their mass spectra and GC retention time with commercial standards (RS, Sigma-Aldrich Co, Taufkirchen, Germany) and the matching degree in the NIST 2017 Mass Spectral library. Finally, for quantification, a total ion current chromatogram (TIC) was employed to integrate the peak area of each compound, similar to other previous works (37, 38). In this work, the compounds considered as identified are those whose mass spectrum shows a height matching the NIST library (>80%), or according to the available standards.

Statistical Analysis

Three replicates were used to obtain the mean values for the levels of volatile compounds and the content of each one. Relative abundances for individual compounds were also calculated as the ratio between the GC-peak area against the added area of total volatiles identified and expressed as percentages. The dependent variable defined the volatiles, and the independent variable was the species. The dataset was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences were assessed by multiple comparisons of means (Tukey's contrast, with a confidence limit based on 95%, p < 0.05). The Statgraphics Plus version 5.1 (Manugistics Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) was used for statistics.

In addition, the dataset was also subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis by means of a web ClustVis tool developed with the R package version 0.10.2.1 for R statistic software, to evaluate the similarity and variation between samples.

Results

Volatile Compounds Identified

The samples showed significant differences in their total levels of volatiles identified, and therefore, there was a considerable diversity in this trait. The analysis of volatiles yielded thirty-seven identified compounds, which were grouped into 11 chemical families, based on their structural characteristics. Table 1 details the mean value of the GC-peak area of each volatile; it also includes the individual code and the identification method, the retention time, and the Kovats index, as well as the p-value (cutoff significance of p < 0.05).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Mean values (GC-peak area unit x 106) for individual volatile compound identified in the leaves of the seven undervalued species and levels of significance (p-value).

The abundance of each chemical family and their respective components were calculated and reported in the peak area relative percentage (Table 2). In general, among eleven chemical families, benzenoids (I), monoterpenoids (II), and medium-chain aldehydes (III) were the majority, with eight volatile components in each of them. In the minority families, the lowest relative concentration was presented by pyrazines (IV), with three compounds, followed by fatty alcohols (VI), sesquiterpenoids (VIII), and organooxygen (IX), and with two compounds for each family. Only one volatile corresponded to the chemical families of alcohols (VII), unsaturated branched hydrocarbons (V), ketones (IX), and organosulfur compounds (X). Regarding the species, benzenoids were the dominant chemical families in T. majus (99.89%) and D. erucoides (99.48%). Monoterpenoids were abundant in P. ruderale (63.83%) and medium-chain aldehydes in S. media (50.77%).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Mean relative abundances percentages (%) of chemical families and individual volatile compounds identified in the leaves of the seven undervalued species.

The comparison of volatile compounds is presented in the leaves, and it showed that volatiles such as benzaldehyde (BZ), benzeneacetaldehyde (BC), benzyl isothiocyanate (BT), hexanal (HA), trans-β-ionone (IO), and β-cyclocitral (CC) were present in all species; some volatiles were present only in one species, being considered differentiating aromas. In T. majus, the differentiating aroma was benzyl alcohol (BA); in P. ruderale, it was eugenol (EU), α-copaene (CO), and (E)-β-ocimene (OC); in P. oleracea, it was 2-isopropyl-3-methoxypyrazine (IP); benzyl isocyanate (BI) was found only in the species T. majus and D. erucoides. The relative content of each chemical family, including the respective individual volatiles, is summarized in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Chemical families of volatiles and their relative content in the leaves of the seven undervalued species. (A) majority volatile families; (B) minority volatile families.

Tropaeolum Majus L (Tropaeolaceae)

It was possible to identify a total of 22 volatile metabolites in this species, most of them belonging to the benzenoids chemical family, followed by medium-chain aldehydes (0.07%). The principal volatile constituent was benzyl isothiocyanate (BT, 95.04%). The differentiating aroma found only in this species was benzyl alcohol (BA, 0.02%).

Stellaria Media (L.) Vill (Caryophyllaceae)

Regarding this species, a total of 23 volatile compounds were identified. The main chemical families were medium-chain aldehydes, fatty alcohols (18.23%), and sesquiterpenoids (11.19%). Between the individual volatile compounds identified, the abundant ones were 2-hexenal (HX, 22.39%) and hexanal (HA, 13.81%) from medium-chain aldehydes, and 1-hexanol (HL, 13.72%) from the fatty alcohols family. Trans-β-ionone (IO, 11.12%) represented the sesquiterpenoids family.

Sonchus Oleraceus L. (Asteraceae)

A total of 27 volatile compounds were identified, being mainly characterized by the benzenoids family (49.61%), followed by the medium-chain aldehydes family (28.59%). The volatile compounds with the greatest influence on the volatile composition of this species are benzeneacetaldehyde (BC, 30.7%), 2-hexenal (HX, 17.14%), and benzaldehyde (BZ, 16.20%).

Chenopodium Album L. (Chenopodiaceae)

Of the 27 identified volatiles, the families of medium-chain aldehydes (43.42%) and benzenoids (30.75%) predominated, followed by the fatty alcohols family (13.97%). The most abundant compounds of the predominant families were 2-hexenal (HX, 26.82%) and 2.4-heptadienal-(E,E) (HP, 10.66%), followed by benzaldehyde (BZ, 16.35%), respectively, whereas 1-hexanol (HL; 13.47%) was from minority families.

Diplotaxis Erucoides (L.) DC (Brassicaceae)

The profile of this species was characterized by 17 individual volatiles found, essentially, from the benzenoids family. At an individual level, the most predominant compound was benzyl nitrile (93.39%). Between the individual volatile compounds from minority families, the presence of 2-hexenal (HX, 0.16%) was highlighted.

Portulaca Oleracea L. (Portulacaceae)

It was possible to identify a total of 16 volatile compounds in this species, of which 32.74% were pyrazines and 32.24% monoterpenoids families, followed by benzenoids (16.21%) and alcohols (11.60%) ones. At the individual level, the compounds with the highest content were 2-sec-butyl-3-methoxypyrazine (SB, 25.07%) and linalool (LN, 20.18%). The volatile from minority families with the greatest amount was 1-butanol, 3-methyl (BU, 11.60%). The differentiating aroma found only in this species was 2-isopropyl-3-methoxypyrazine (IP, 2.07%).

Porophyllum Ruderale (Jacq.) Cass (Asteraceae)

Regarding the characterization of the volatile profile of this species, 27 volatile metabolites were identified, mainly families of monoterpenoids and branches unsaturated hydrocarbons (20.54%). Its main individual volatile constituents were p-cymene (PC, 26.10%) and γ-terpinene (TP, 20.54%), respectively. The differentiating aromas found only in this species were (E)-β-ocimene (OC, 1.02%), α-copaene (CO, 0.26%), and eugenol (EU, 0.2%).

General Analysis

The general ANOVA analysis recognized the statistically significant effects of the species (p-value) on the content of volatile compounds, which are indicated in Table 1, with the letters as a super index for each constituent.

Most of the individual volatile compounds had significant differences between species (p < 0.05), except medium-chain aldehydes (code HE, HP, and ND), monoterpenoids (PC), and ketones (OD). These general results indicate a different behavior in the synthesis of individual volatile compounds, depending on each species and the specific environmental conditions of the season.

Principal Component Analysis

To reduce the dimensionality of the dataset containing many interrelated variables, the principal component analysis (PCA) method was applied, which allowed obtaining a reduced number of linear combinations of 37 identified aromatic components. In this case, six components have been extracted that explain 92.35% of the variability in the original data. Figure 3 shows the values of two principal components with greater strength, which explain more than 50% of the variability of the data, the first component (PC1) and second (PC2) accounted, respectively, 33.51% and 25.81% of the total variation. Figure 3A (the score) allows visualization of the sample distribution based on PC1 and PC2. For instance, three species, D. erucoides, T. majus, and P. oleracea, were spread along PC1 and PC2 at negative value for both. Two species S. oleraceus and C. album cluster around zero on PC2 and have been characterized by negative value of PC1. The species P. ruderale is characterized by high value of PC1 component and negative values of PC2. The species S. media was spread along PC2 at high positive value. Figure 3B (the loadings) shows the distribution of each of the identified volatile components has had in the classification of the species. The loading presentation indicated that the monoterpenoid and sesquiterpenoid families were predominantly important for species separation along PC1, while the medium-chain aldehyde family was predominantly important for species separation along PC2.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the investigated samples. Scores (A) and loadings (B) of the two principal components on the matrix correlations were built using data from individual volatiles.

Larger loadings indicate that the volatile has a strong effect on the corresponding PC. The most positive effects on the PC1 have compounds with the codes α-copaene (CO), β-myrcene (MY), α-terpinene (AT), β-caryophyllene (CP), (E)-β-ocimene (OC), (Z)-β-ocimene (OM), 2,4-hexadienal-(E,E) (HD), and decanal (DE), and the most negative effect the d-limonene, 5-methyl-5-hepten-2-one. The most positive effects on the PC2 have compounds with the codings hexanal (HA), 2-hexenal (HX), 2-hexenal (HE), 2,4-heptadienal-(E,E) (HP), 2,6-non-adienal-(E,Z) (ND), β-cyclocitral (CC), trans-β-ionone (IO), 3,5-octadien-2-one, (E,E) (OD), and the most negative effects α-terpinene and eugenol. Therefore, the between-species difference revealed by the preliminary PCA of volatile profiles is probably due to genotype diversity, leading to a different metabolic pattern rather than geoclimatic conditions. In addition, the relationship between individual compounds was also evaluated by the hierarchical cluster analysis (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Hierarchical cluster analysis for identified volatile compounds in the seven undervalued species. Data represent the average value compounds (n = 3) for each studied plant. For the code of the compound identities, refer to Table 1.

This analysis grouped samples into two main clusters, where five subgroups are clearly differentiated. S. oleraceus, S. media, and C. album were the most numerous subgroup. These species showed a more homogeneous distribution of the chemical families and their respective compounds. A homogeneous presence was observed for the majority chemical families such as medium-chain aldehydes, followed by the benzenoids with less homogeneity, while the minorities were such families as fatty acids, ketones, and organooxygen compounds. Other subgroups contained a single species, which were T. majus, P. ruderale, D. erucoides, and P. oleracea, respectively. Each of these species was classified as an independent group due to the heterogeneity or absence of some volatile compounds and, above all, due to the presence of differentiating aromas. However, T. majus is grouped with the most numerous subgroup, while D. erucoides and P. oleracea could also be grouped in another subcluster. The only species that has a differential aromatic behavior is P. ruderale.

Discussion

Edible wild plants are traditionally used for their flavor and aroma in food, to improve the attractiveness of everyday dishes and, probably, to prevent certain human diseases. Aroma-active volatile compounds of plants are found in very small quantities. Despite their small amounts, they can act as olfactory and taste stimuli. The wild edible species of this study belonged to different seasons of Mediterranean conditions, which were spring–summer and autumn–winter.

The contents of volatile compounds varied markedly among the seven undervalued species, each differing in their aroma profile. The typical aroma of vegetables depends on the number of volatiles, their chemical nature, and the synergic effects. Also, the portion of glycosidically bound volatiles is usually greater than that of free volatiles, making them an important potential source of flavor compounds (39). The relative amounts of these compounds and their odor threshold may be related to the time of harvest and habitat conditions. A total of 37 volatiles were found among seven species studied, and they were grouped into 11 chemical families, due to their qualitative and quantitative differences. All obtained profiles were shown to have a variety of proportions of identified volatile compounds. The most abundant groups according to GC-peak area units were benzenoids, monoterpenoids, and medium-chain aldehydes, whereas branched unsaturated hydrocarbons and fatty alcohols were minor groups, among others. 37 highlight that the volatile compounds synthesized by the botanical families to which the studied species belong are composed of twelve more common chemical families, among which are C5-branched chain compounds; nitrogen-containing compounds; aliphatic compounds; benzenoids and phenyl propanoids; sesquiterpenes; and irregular terpenes and monoterpenes, all of which were found in our study. At the individual level, a wide range of qualitative variability was also detected, with compounds such as benzaldehyde (BZ), benzyl isothiocyanate (BT), hexanal (HA), trans-ß-ionone (IO), and ß-cyclocitral (CC). A few compounds were only found in some species and were considered as differentiating aromas. Consequently, the differences of chemical groups were also very diverse at both quantitative and qualitative levels.

There is little evidence in the literature for volatile profiles from the fresh leaves of T. majus, since the flower is one of the most popular and best-known edible parts. Thus, study of the essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation of T. majus aerial parts (leaves and flowers), carried out by Lim (40), reported the content of eight carotenoids, fatty acids, flavonoids, and antibiotic tromalytes and found that the leaves were the primary site of benzylglucosinolate synthesis, with their contents increasing in the adult plant. On the contrary, (41) have reported high levels of glucosinolate glucotropaeolin concentration (between 48 to 78 μmol/g dry weight) in the dried leaves of T. majus, determined by HPLC analysis. After enzymatic activity, this glucosinolate transforms into benzyl isothiocyanate, a volatile compound first found in our research to be in abundance in this plant. In the study of the same authors, it is pointed out that similar enzymatic activity occurs when Tropaeolum leaves are freshly consumed, so the derived compound is absorbed in the intestine and excreted in the urine, exhibiting its antimicrobial activity (41). However, (42) have completed the characterization of the volatile compounds of Indian cress (T. majus) by GC-olfactometry/VIDEO-Sniff and HS-SPME-GCxGC-TOFMS, where they identified 44 odorant compounds and highlighted powerful sulfury and fruity notes. In our study, for the same species, organosulfur compounds were absent and benzyl isothiocyanate was classified as the benzenoids family (although with the presence of sulfur); this was substantially predominant, followed by benzaldehyde. The benzaldehyde compound has aromatic descriptors such as almond notes, roasted, and bitter (43, 44), while benzylglucosinolate accumulates in the mature plants of Tropaeolum majus L., increasing its content progressively from seeds until the leaves become the main site for its synthesis (45). The results of our study suggest that benzaldehyde and benzyl isothiocyanate in T. majus might be of special importance for the aroma of this one. Other secondary metabolites with strong anti-inflammatory activity and an important anti-infectious/antimicrobial action provided by aromatic esters and alcohols that were highlighted have also been described in other works (46). The volatile compound 1-hexanol (fatty alcohols family) was found in this study. Despite its scarcity, it is associated with a pungent aroma (47). A study by Kawada (48) has reported that pungent ingredients have anti-weight-gain properties and are being utilized for the development of functional foods. Both compounds, benzyl alcohol and benzyl isocyanate, identified in our study in T. majus, may be postulated as differentiating aromas, since the first is characteristic only of this species, and the other, due to its significant concentration, is compared to the other components from their volatile profile. The review article by (49) corroborates that benzyl alcohol has been reported to occur in nature, with the highest amounts observed in allium plants species. However, future studies are necessary to determine the differentiating aroma of this compound in the botanical family Tropaeolaceae (T. majus). In addition, according to (50), alcohols, aldehydes, and acetates are widely distributed in fresh green plant tissues and considered to be responsible for typical “green leaf” odor. On the contrary, the isothiocyanate identified has aromatic descriptors that characterize it as a “cabbage” aroma (51) and confer several bitter taste characteristics and black mustard-like notes, as well as giving beneficial bioactive effects (52).

Other species of our study (D. erucoides) also had a presence of benzyl isothiocyanate, although in much lower concentration. Its presence may be since both plants are from the Brassicales order, which is characterized by accumulate glucosinolate metabolites, which enzymatically hydrolyze into other volatile compounds by plant tissue damage (53). The derived products from hydrolysis of glucosinolates depend on the plant species and conditions in which the hydrolysis occurs. These hydrolysis products do not reach a toxic level for humans when they are included in a diet (54, 55). In D. erucoides, this hydrolysis can lead to considerable levels of isothiocyanates and nitriles (56). In addition, the intake of these compounds provides health benefits such as the reduction of the risk of cancer (57). In our case, the benzyl nitrile was the majority component from the benzenoid chemical family in D. erucoides. The nitrile component is also contributing toward pungency notes and several bitter tastes, in addition to providing the sulfurous aromatic attributes (53). This aromatic combination is modified by the presence of the other volatile components that affect the acceptance of the organoleptic characteristics of the plants (58). In particular, the volatile profiles of Valencian D. erucoides in baby-leaves stages grown in a substrate under controlled conditions in the study carried out by (59) were different, detecting only nine compounds vs. fifteen in this study, of which only one has coincided in our study (benzyl isothiocyanate). Likewise, the absence of the monoterpenoids family was observed. This difference suggests the importance of the state of maturity on the formation of the volatility profile and the optimal harvest time of the plants (60, 61). No differentiating aroma was detected in this species.

P. ruderale was the species where the greatest number of differentiating aromas was found. These important plant constituents were (E)-β-ocimene > α-copaene and eugenol. The research carried out by 61 described the flavor/aroma of (E)-β-ocimene as a “pleasant, warm herbaceous note” and noted that its presence depends on seasonal variation. In addition, this component is among the main volatile ones in parsley (P. crispum (Mill.) Nyx. Ex A.W. Hill) and peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) (62). According to (63), some compounds, including eugenol (clove aroma), are presented as the most odor-active components. In return, α-copaene exhibited a cytotoxic effect on MCF-7 breast carcinoma cell lines (64). In agreement with the previously mentioned study, the aromatic profile of P. ruderale varied greatly, depending on its geographic origin. A study carried out by Fonsceca et al. (65) on the composition of Bolivian P. ruderale oil showed that the leaf oil had monoterpene sabinene (64%) as the major constituent; the leaf oil from Mexican P. ruderale had limonene (71.4%) as the major constituent, as did the oil of plants from Brazil (74.6%).

Both studies mentioned were carried out with the hydrodistillation extracts, which is very different from the handling of volatiles in this study. HS-SPME/GC-MS allows more genuine volatiles and aromas to be obtained. Within the limitations of the existence of standards and a managed internal library, the majority component found was p-cymene, followed by γ-terpinene. However, the family of fatty alcohols was not detected. Being native to the Western Hemisphere, P. ruderale from the Valencian coast has changed its volatile profile in the first approach of this study and may be an interesting hypothesis for further studies. These results allow us to observe how this species shows considerable plasticity of chemotype change as a function of geoclimatic conditions.

The aromatic description of volatiles present in considerable amounts is characterized as “minty/piney” or “terpenic/tropical herbal” for γ-terpinene and its flavor type as “terpenic/citrus/oily green” (47, 66), as well as “herbal/floral” or “citrus/sweet” aroma for (Z)-β-ocimene (66, 67). The organoleptic properties of α-terpinene are described as the odor type “woody, herbal, and medicinal,” and its flavor type as “terpenic/spicy/sharp/minty” (47), or it may be “citrus-like/herbaceous/terpeny” (68). The volatile component p-cymene can be described as the most odor-active component due to its high level in this study, and its characteristics are described as having a “fragrant/sweet/fresh/herbaceous note” (68). All these aromatic characteristics correlate with favorable organoleptic attributes, in addition to providing an antimicrobial effect characteristic of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes (69).

Another species different from the others was P. oleracea, which was confirmed by the heatmap of volatile compounds. It is perhaps the plant with the greatest studies carried out on its volatile compounds. The differentiating aroma in our study was 2-isopropyl-3-methoxypyrazine and its homolog 2-sec-butyl-3-methoxypyrazine, reaching the highest amount among the individual compounds of P. oleracea. In contrast with a study carried out by Dabbou et al. (70) with Tunisian purslane leaves, where the pyrazine family was the minority and oxygenated monoterpenes the majority, in our study the pyrazine family was predominant, along with monoterpenoids. The same authors emphasize that some volatile compounds act as bioactive components, with pharmacological effects such as anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, and muscle relaxant, among others. According to (71), Chinese purslane had the presence of benzeneacetaldehyde and linalool among its volatile compounds; the same ones were found in our study. Considering that this plant is very popular in traditional Chinese medicine, it is possible that some of the volatile compounds have pharmacological activity. Among chemical families, pyrazines and alcohols stood out above all. As (72) study indicates, pyrazine family compounds have strong antibacterial activity and could significantly inhibit or kill common enteropathogenic bacteria. This consideration could require future studies on the pyrazine family of Valencian P. oleracea, even more so since one component of this family was the differentiating aroma and it is found in green bell peppers and peas (62). Other individual compounds present in considerable amounts were linalool and 1-butanol, 3-methyl. The first is characteristic in basil (O. basilicum L.), coriander (C. sativum L.), and thyme (T. vulgaris L.), while the second is found in tomato juice (73). The aromatic descriptors for linalool are “flowery/rose”; for 1-butanol, 3-methyl they are “chemical/harsh/stakes” (74) and “fruity/malty” (75).

The largest group of chemical compounds was concentrated in the species S. media, S. oleraceus, and C. album. This group was characterized by a more homogeneous distribution of the chemical families identified in each of the volatile profiles and the absence of differentiating aromas. S. oleraceus was a species where all the volatile chemical families were found, especially organosulfur compounds such as dimethyl sulfide. Along with its counterpart, dimethyl trisulfide, it is identified as the main aroma component in cooked Brassicaceous vegetables and has a strong and unpleasant aroma, although odor thresholds vary considerably for different chemicals. In contrast, dimethyl sulfide of kale (B. oleracea), with other compounds, contributed to roasted/sulfur-like/pungent and sweet aroma characteristics (44). Therefore, this component could be considered as a differentiating aroma for S. oleraceus. However, some volatile compounds present in trace amounts can contribute significantly to the characteristic flavor and aroma of fresh foods (76). Other abundant families were benzenoids and medium-chain aldehydes. At the individual level, qualitative variability of compounds such as benzeneacetaldehyde was detected, much higher in S. oleraceus vs. S. media and C. album, its odor description being “floral/herbal/honey/cocoa” (77). The components without a significant level of differences between the three species were 2.4-hexenal, with a “fruity/sweet/fresh” odor note (78), and 2.4-heptadienal-(E, E), one of the lipid-degraded compounds with “metallic and rancid off-flavor” aromatic notes (79), or with the description “fatty/nutty/hay/green/oily” (80). As a particularity of each species, the high content of medium-chain aldehydes stands out in S. media and C. album, followed by the families of fatty alcohols and benzenoids, respectively. Meanwhile, at the individual level, 1-hexanol emerged with a higher amount in S. media compared to the other two species of the group. Likewise, the presence of benzyl isothiocyanate stands out in the three species without significant differences. There is also a considerable amount of trans-β-ionone in S. media compared to its group counterparts, and there is a presence of trans-2-hexenol, especially in S. media, followed by S. oleraceus, with both exceeding the level of C. album. The odor description for trans-β-ionone, the volatile from the sesquiterpenoids family, is “woody/violet/fruity” (66). Alternatively, the natural occurrence of trans-2-hexenol is reported in many foods such as allium species, cabbage, chamomile, and lettuce, among others (81). Some volatile production is related to disrupted tissue (membrane breakdown), especially the trans-2-hexenol, for which the aroma is described as “green/leafy” (82, 83).

In general, many C10 monoterpenoids and C15 sesquiterpenes comprise the most abundant group of compounds present in aroma profiles. In some cases, there are also key compounds determining the characteristic aroma (39). This study has corroborated the predominance of monoterpenoids as a majority family, together with benzenoids and medium-chain aldehydes families. However, the maturity of the plants and their integrity also affect the presence of some volatiles in the aroma profiles of plants. The volatile analysis showed a difference in the relative abundance of the multiple chemical families and their components found in this study. It is known that the main volatiles have their contribution to aromas perceived from food. However, minor volatiles also contribute to organoleptic qualities such as odor and taste, an example of which is (E)-β-ocimene, contributing delicate and elegant aroma characteristics (66). The study confirmed that the aromatic characteristics of the plants under the same geoclimatic conditions show a high variety of volatile compounds. The specific aroma could be used as a biochemical marker of quality characteristics. Sensory aroma analysis as an organoleptic quality of these plants could be included in future research to assess their acceptability and clarify whether aroma differentiation is due to a combination of intensity and relative abundance of some individual volatiles.

Conclusion

This study is the first report to assess the volatile profiles and identification of differentiating aromas of the seven selected plants that provide a basis for characterization of their organoleptic qualities. Assessment of the volatile profiles was carried out using the HS-SPME/GC-MS method, which was demonstrated to be appropriate for the analysis of volatile compounds in the seven edible plants as an initial approximation in the aromatic quality. These undervalued species showed differences in their aromas, which constitutes an appreciable organoleptic characteristic of the wild species, together with other secondary metabolites present (polyphenols and total acidity). In general, the results obtained in the present work corroborate that the fresh leaves of the studied species are identified by their own organoleptic quality due to the great variability of their volatile profiles that include the constituents with possible bioactive characteristics. These metabolites were grouped into more abundant families, which turned out to be monoterpenoids and benzenoids. The results reveal that the studied undervalued species could be a suitable choice as an alternative to conventional vegetables and as possible material in sustainable production systems. In addition, these plants, due to their organoleptic values, such as flavor and aroma, could contribute to the diversification of gastronomic ingredients and could collaborate in the provision of a healthy and beneficial diet for the health of consumers and the benefit of the planet.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

TF and MR planned the study, curated the data, and drafted the manuscript. MR supervised the research. TF, MG-M, and EM-P performed the volatile detection and quantification experiments. TF performed the statistical analyses. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Manuel Figueroa from the local Ecological Cooperative and who kindly provided the materials used in this study on time and in sufficient quantity for his direct collaboration.

References

1. Leonti M, Nebel S, Rivera D, Heinrich M. Wild gathered food plants in the European mediterranean: a comparative analysis. Econ Bot. (2006) 60:130–42. doi: 10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[130:WGFPIT]2.0.CO;2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Vanzani P, Rossetto M, De Marco V, Sacchetti LE, Paoletti MG, Rigo A. Wild Mediterranean plants as traditional food: a valuable source of antioxidants. J Food Sci. (2011) 76:C46–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01949.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Pancorbo-Olivera M, Rondinel FAP, Guevara JJT, Fernández AC. Los otros alimentos: Plantas comestibles silvestres y arvenses en dos comunidades campesinas de los Andes Centrales del Perú. Revista Etnobiología. (2020) 18:8–36. Available online at: https://revistaetnobiologia.mx/index.php/etno/article/view/353/337

Google Scholar

4. Disciglio G, Tarantino A, Frabboni L, Gagliardi A, Giuliani M, Tarantino E. Qualitative characterisation of cultivated and wild edible plants: mineral elements, phenols content and antioxidant capacity. Ital J Agronomy. (2017) 12. doi: 10.4081/ija.2017.1036

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Vlaisavljević S, Jelača S, Zengin G, Mimica-Dukić N, BereŽni S., et al. Alchemilla vulgaris agg. (Lady's mantle) from central Balkan: antioxidant, anticancer and enzyme inhibition properties. RSC Adv. (2019) 9:37474–83. doi: 10.1039/C9RA08231J

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Jakubczyk K, Tuchowska A, Janda-Milczarek K. Plant hydrolates–Antioxidant properties, chemical composition and potential applications. Biomed Pharmacother. (2021) 142:112033. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hadjichambis A. C., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi D., Della A., Elena Giusti M., Pasquale D. e., et al. Wild and semi-domesticated food plant consumption in seven circum-Mediterranean areas. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2008) 59:383–414. doi: 10.1080/09637480701566495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Romojaro A, Botella MÁ, Obón C, Pretel MT. Nutritional and antioxidant properties of wild edible plants and their use as potential ingredients in the modern diet. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2013) 64:944–52. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2013.821695

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tardío J, Cortes Sánchez-Mata d. e, Morales M, Molina R, García-Herrera M, Morales P. “Ethnobotanical and Food Composition Monographs of Selected Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants”, In: Sánchez-Mata M, Tardío J,. editors. Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants. Springer: New York. p. 273–470 doi: 10.1007./978-1-4939-3329-7_13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. García-Herrera P, Morales P, Cámara M, Fernández-Ruiz V, Tardío J, Sánchez-Mata MC. Nutritional and phytochemical composition of mediterranean wild vegetables after culinary treatment. Foods. (2020) 9:1761. doi: 10.3390/foods9121761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Savo V, Salomone F, Bartoli F, Caneva G. When the local cuisine still incorporates wild food plants: the unknown traditions of the monti picentini regional park (Southern Italy). Econ Bot. (2019) 73:28–46. doi: 10.1007/s12231-018-9432-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Motti R, Bonanomi G, Lanzotti V, Sacchi R. The contribution of wild edible plants to the mediterranean diet: an ethnobotanical case study along the coast of Campania (Southern Italy). Econ Bot. (2020) 74:249–72. doi: 10.1007/s12231-020-09504-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Tepper BJ. Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annu Rev Nutr. (2008) 28:367–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.28.061807.155458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Schwab W, Davidovich-Rikanati R, Lewinsohn E. Biosynthesis of plant-derived flavor compounds. Plant J. (2008) 54:712–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03446.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Marčetić M, Kovačević N, Lakušić D, Lakušić B. Habitat-related variation in composition of the essential oil of Seseli rigidum Waldst. and Kit. (Apiaceae). Phytochemistry. (2017) 135:80–92. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.12, 004.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Dudareva N, Negre F, Nagegowda DA, Orlova I. Plant volatiles: recent advances and future perspectives. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. (2006) 25:417–40. doi: 10.1080/07352680600899973

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Pusztahelyi T, Holb IJ, Pócsi I. Secondary metabolites in fungus-plant interactions. Front Plant Sci. (2015) 6:573. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lopez-Gresa MP, Lisón P, Campos L, Rodrigo I, Rambla JL, Granell A. A non-targeted metabolomics approach unravels the VOCs associated with the tomato immune response against Pseudomonas syringae. Front Plant Sci. (2017) 8:1188. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Moraga AR, Rambla JL, Ahrazem O, Granell A, Gómez-Gómez L. Metabolite and target transcript analyses during Crocus sativus stigma development. Phytochemistry. (2009) 70:1009–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.04, 022.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Pott DM, Osorio S, Vallarino JG. From central to specialized metabolism: an overview of some secondary compounds derived from the primary metabolism for their role in conferring nutritional and organoleptic characteristics to fruit. Front Plant Sci. (2019) 10:835. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Pichersky E, Gershenzon J. The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. Curr Opin Plant Biol. (2002) 5:237–43. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00251-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Maffei ME, Gertsch J, Appendino G. Plant volatiles: production, function and pharmacology. Nat Prod Rep. (2011) 28:1359–80. doi: 10.1039/c1np00021g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Visai C, Vanoli M. Volatile compound production during growth and ripening of peaches and nectarines. Sci Hortic. (1997) 70:15–24. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00032-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Goff SA, Klee HJ. Plant volatile compounds: sensory cues for health and nutritional value? Science. (2006) 311:815–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1112614

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Karaman K, Polat B, Ozturk I, Sagdic O, Ozdemir C. Volatile compounds and bioactivity of Eremurus spectabilis (Ciris), a Turkish wild edible vegetable. J Med Food. (2011) 14:1238–43. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2010.0262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Landoulsi A, Roumy V, Duhal N, Skhiri FH, Rivière C, Sahpaz S. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from aerial parts and roots of Eryngium barrelieri Boiss and Eryngium glomeratum Lam from Tunisia. Chem Biodivers. (2016) 13:1720–9. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201600136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Choi HS, Kim SL, Kim JH, Ko YC, Lee DS. Plant volatile, phenylacetaldehyde targets breast cancer stem cell by induction of ROS and regulation of Stat3 signal. Antioxidants. (2020) 9:1119. doi: 10.3390/antiox9111119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Kumar P, Shaunak I, Verma ML. “Biotechnological application of health promising bioactive molecules”, In: Biotechnological Production of Bioactive Compounds. editors, Madan L., Verma Anuj K,. Chandel. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier B.V. (2020). p. 165–189.

Google Scholar

29. Goto T, Takahashi N, Hirai S, Kawada T. Various Terpenoids Derived from Herbal and Dietary Plants Function as PPAR Modulators and Regulate Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolism. PPAR Res. (2010) 9:483958. doi: 10.1155/2010/483958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Reed DR, Alhadeff AL, Beauchamp GK, Chaudhari N, Duffy VB, Dus M. NIH Workshop report: sensory nutrition and disease. Am J Clin Nutr. (2021) 113:232–45. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Williams DE. Cultivos infrautilizados, cambio climático y un nuevo paradigma para la agricultura. Ambienta. (2013) 102:56–65. Available online at: https://www.mapa.gob.es/ministerio/pags/Biblioteca/Revistas/pdf_AM%2FAmbienta_2013_102_56_65.pdf

Google Scholar

32. Aryal K, Moe AT, Hein PP, Bay YHS, Htay T, Aung HW. Wild and non-cultivated edible plants and their contribution to local livelihoods in Putao, Myanmar. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development GPO Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal. (2020).

Google Scholar

33. Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M, Morales R. Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain. Bot J Linn. Soc. (2006) 52:27–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00549.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Morales R, Tardío J, Aceituno L, Molina M, Pardo d. e. S. “Biodiversidad y Etnobotánica en España”, in: Memorias de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural, editor. Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural. Madrid: Spain (2011). p. 157–208. http://hdl.handle.net/10261/66932

Google Scholar

35. Soria García JM, Romo S, Palacios Pastor A, García Picazo A, Aledón Catal T, Calvo García S. “Evaluación de la conservación de los humedales costeros de la Comunidad Valenciana mediante imágenes de Landsat”, In: Teledetección: Humedales y Espacios Protegidos. XVI Congreso de la Asociación Española de Teledetección. editors, J. Bustamante R, Díaz-Delgado D, Aragonés, I. Afán y, D García. Sevilla: Spain. (2015) p. 354.

Google Scholar

36. Moreno E., Fita A., González-Mas M. C., Rodríguez-Burruezo A. HS-SPME study of the volatile fraction of Capsicum accessions and hybrids in different parts of the fruit. Sci Hortic. (2012) 135:87–97. 001 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.12, 001.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Knudsen JT, Eriksson R, Gershenzon J, Ståhl B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot Rev. (2006) 72:1. doi: 10.1663/0006-8101(2006)72[1:DADOFS]2.0.CO;2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Kollmannsberger H, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Nitz S, Nuez F. Volatile and capsaicionid composition of ají (Capsicum baccatum) and rocoto (Capsicum pubescens), two Andean species of chile peppers. J Sci Food Agric. (2011) 91:1598–1161. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. El Hadi MAM, Zhang FJ, Wu FF, Zhou CH, Tao J. Advances in fruit aroma volatile research. Molecules. (2013) 18:8200–29. doi: 10.3390/molecules18078200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lim TK. “Tropaeolum majus”, In Edible Medicinal and Non Medicinal Plants. Dordrecht: Springer. (2014). p. 777–87.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

41. Kleinwächter M, Schnug E, Selmar D. The Glucosinolate–Myrosinase System in Nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus L.): Variability of Biochemical Parameters and Screening for Clones Feasible for Pharmaceutical Utilization. J Agric Food Chem. (2008) 56:11165–70. doi: 10.1021/jf802053n

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Breme K, Tournayre P, Fernandez X, Meierhenrich UJ, Brevard H, Joulain D. Characterization of volatile compounds of Indian cress absolute by GC-olfactometry/VIDEO-sniff and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J Agric Food Chem. (2010) 58:473–80. doi: 10.1021/jf902946v

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Belitz HD, Grosch W, Schieberle P. “Aroma compounds”, In: Food chemistry, editor. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. (2004). p. 342–408.

Google Scholar

44. Oh J, Cho IH. The aroma profile and aroma-active compounds of Brassica oleracea (kale) tea. Food Sci Biotechnol. (2021) 30:1205–11. doi: 10.1007/s10068-021-00962-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Lykkesfeldt J, Moller BL. Synthesis of benzylglucosinolate in Tropaeolum majus L. (isothiocyanates as potent enzyme inhibitors). Plant Physiol. (1993) 102:609–13. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.2.609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Ghedira K, Goetz P. Tropaeolum majus L. (Tropaeolaceae) Phytothérapie. (2013) 11:316–9. doi: 10.1007/s10298-013-0808-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. The Good Scents Company Information Systems. (2021). Available online at: www.thegoodscentscompany.com

Google Scholar

48. Kawada T. Food-derived regulatory factors against obesity and metabolic syndrome. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. (2018) 82:547–53. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2017.1401912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. cognamiglio J, Jones L, Vitale D, Letizia CS, Api AM. Fragrance material review on benzyl alcohol. Food Chem Toxicol. (2012) 50:S140–60. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.10, 013.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Tava A, Pecetti L, Ricci M, Pagnotta MA, Russi L. Volatile compounds from leaves and flowers of Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Stirt. (Fabaceae) from Italy. Flavour Fragr J. (2007) 22:363–70. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1806

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Grimalt M, Sánchez-Rodríguez L, Hernández F, Legua P, Carbonell-Barrachina ÁA, Almansa MS. Volatile profile in different aerial parts of two caper cultivars (Capparis spinosa L.). J Food Qual. (2021) 9:6620779. doi: 10.1155/2021/6620776

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Parker JK. “Introduction to aroma compounds in foods”. In: Flavour Development, Analysis and Perception in Food and Beverages, editor. Woodhead Publishing Series. (2015) 3–30. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-103-0.00001-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Bell L, Oloyede OO, Lignou S, Wagstaff C, Methven L. Taste and flavor perceptions of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates, and related compounds. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2018) 62:1700990. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201700990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Angelino D, Dosz EB, Sun J, Hoeflinger JL, Van Tassell ML, Chen P. Myrosinase-dependent and–independent formation and control of isothiocyanate products of glucosinolate hydrolysis. Front Plant Sci. (2015) 6:831. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Hanschen FS, Schreiner M. Isothiocyanates, nitriles, and epithionitriles from glucosinolates are affected by genotype and developmental stage in Brassica oleracea varieties. Front Plant Sci. (2017) 8:1095. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Raffo A, Masci M, Moneta E, Nicoli S, Sánchez Del Pulgar J, Paoletti F. Characterization of volatiles and identification of odor-active compounds of rocket leaves. Food Chem. (2018) 240:1161–1170. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.08, 009.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Fernández-León AM, Fernández-León MF, González-Gómez D, Ayuso MC, Bernalte MJ. Quantification and bioaccessibility of intact glucosinolates in broccoli ‘Parthenon' and Savoy cabbage ‘Dama'. J Food Composit Anal. (2017) 61:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.11, 010.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Gioia D, Avato I, Serio FP, Argentieri MP. Glucosinolate profile of Eruca sativa, Diplotaxis tenuifolia and Diplotaxis erucoides grown in soil and soilless systems. J Food Compost Anal. (2018) 69:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.01, 022.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Guijarro-Real C, Prohens J, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Fita A. Consumers acceptance and volatile profile of wall rocket (Diplotaxis erucoides). Int Food Res J. (2020) 132:109008. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Monfort LEF, Bertolucci SKV, Lima AF, Mohammed AA, Blank A, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators, different culture media and strength MS on production of volatile fraction composition in shoot cultures of Ocimum basilicum. Ind Crops Prod. (2018)116:231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.02.075

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Tiwari S, Kate A, Mohapatra D, Tripathi MK, Ray H, Akuli A, et al. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs): Biomarkers for quality management of horticultural commodities during storage through e-sensing. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 106:417–433. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.10, 039.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Pinto T, Aires A, Cosme F, Bacelar E, Morais MC, Oliveira I. Bioactive (Poly) phenols, volatile compounds from vegetables, medicinal and aromatic plants. Foods. (2021) 10:106. doi: 10.3390/foods10010106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Kilic A, Hafizoglu H, Kollmannsberger H, Nitz S. Volatile constituents and key odorants in leaves, buds, flowers, and fruits of Laurus nobilis L. J Agric Food Chem. (2004) 52:1601–6. doi: 10.1021/jf0306237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Essien EE, Newby JM, Walker TM, Ogunwande IA, Setzer WN, Ekundayo O. Essential oil constituents, anticancer and antimicrobial activity of Ficus mucoso and Casuarina equisetifolia leaves. Am J Essent Oil. (2016) 4:1–6. Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Emmanuel-Essien-4/publication/318654405_Essential_oil_constituents_anticancer_and_antimicrobial_activity_of_Ficus_mucoso_and_Casuarina_equisetifolia_leaves/links/5975dd99458515e26d14453a/Essential-oil-constituents-anticancer-and-antimicrobial-activity-of-Ficus-mucoso-and-Casuarina-equisetifolia-leaves.pdf

Google Scholar

65. Fonsceca MCM, Barbosa LC, Nascimento EA, Casali VWD. Essential oil from leaves and flowers of Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cassini (Asteraceae). J Essent Oil Res. (2006) 18 345–7. doi: 10.1080/1042006, 9699108.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Cai X, Mai RZ, Zou JJ, Zhang HY, Zeng XL, Zheng RR, et al. Analysis of aroma-active compounds in three sweet osmanthus (Osmanthus fragrans) cultivars by GC-olfactometry and GC-MS. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. (2014) 15:638–48. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Suharta S, Hunaefi D, Wijaya CH. Changes in volatiles and aroma profile of andaliman (Zanthoxylum acanthopodium DC.) upon various drying techniques. Food Chem. (2021) 365:130483. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130483

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Mariaca RG, Berger TF, Gauch R, Imhof MI, Jeangros B, Bosset JO. Occurrence of volatile mono-and sesquiterpenoids in highland and lowland plant species as possible precursors for flavor compounds in milk and dairy products. J Agric Food Chem. (1997) 45:4423–34. doi: 10.1021/jf970216t

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Chimnoi N, Reuk-Ngam N, Chuysinuan P, Khlaychan P, Khunnawutmanotham N, Chokchaichamnankit D, et al. Characterization of essential oil from Ocimum gratissimum leaves: Antibacterial and mode of action against selected gastroenteritis pathogens. Microb Pathog. (2018) 118:290–300. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.03, 041.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Dabbou S, Lahbib K, Pandino G, Lombardo S. Evaluation of pigments, phenolic and volatile compounds, and antioxidant activity of a spontaneous population of Portulaca oleracea L. Grown Tunisia Agricul. (2020) 10:353. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10080353

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Zhu H, Wang Y, Liang H, Chen Q, Zhao P, Tao J. Identification of Portulaca oleracea L. from different sources using GC–MS and FT-IR spectroscopy. Talanta. (2010) 81:129–35. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.11, 047.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Lei X, Li J, Liu B, Zhang N, Liu H. Separation and identification of four new compounds with antibacterial activity from Portulaca oleracea L. Molecules. (2015) 20:16375–87. doi: 10.3390/molecules200916375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Vallverdú-Queralt A, Bendini A, Tesini F, Valli E, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Toschi TG. Chemical and sensory analysis of commercial tomato juices present on the Italian and Spanish markets. J AagricFood Chem. (2013) 61:1044–50. doi: 10.1021/jf304631c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Komes D, Ulrich D, Lovric T. Characterization of odor-active compounds in Croatian Rhine Riesling wine, subregion Zagorje. EurFood Res Technol. (2006) 222:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00217-005-0094-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Griglione A, Liberto E, Cordero C, Bressanello D, Cagliero C, Rubiolo P. High-quality Italian rice cultivars: Chemical indices of ageing and aroma quality. Food Chem. (2015) 172:305–13. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.09, 082.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Maruyama FT. Identification of dimethyl trisulfide as a major aroma component of cooked brassicaceous vegetables. J Food Sci. (1970) 35:540–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-1970, tb04803.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Dias LG, Hacke A, Bergara SF, Villela OV, Mariutti LRB, Bragagnolo N. Identification of volatiles and odor-active compounds of aromatic rice by OSME analysis and SPME/GC-MS. Food Res Int. (2021) 142:110206. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Hatanaka A, Kajiwara T, Horino H, Inokuchi K. Odor-Structure Relationships in n-Hexenols and n-Hexenais. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C. (1992) 47:183–9. doi: 10.1515/znc-1992-3-403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Sun SM, Chung GH, Shin TS. Volatile compounds of the green alga, Capsosiphon fulvescens. J Appl Phycol. (2012) 24 1003–13. doi: 10.1007/s10811-011-9724-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Guo X, Ho CT, Schwab W, Wan X. Effect of the roasting degree on flavor quality of large-leaf yellow tea. Food Chem. (2021) 347:129016. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Api AM, Belsito D, Botelho D, Bruze M, Burton GA Jr, Buschmann J, et al. RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, trans-2-Hexenol, CAS Registry Number 928-95-0. Food Chem. Toxicol. (2018) 118:S49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.06, 033.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Du XF, Kurnianta A, McDaniel M, Finn CE, Qian MC. Flavour profiling of ‘Marion'and thornless blackberries by instrumental and sensory analysis. Food Chem. (2010) 121:1080–88. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.01, 053.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Hatanaka A. The fresh green odor emitted by plants. Food Rev Int. (1996) 12:303–50. doi: 10.1080/87559129609541083

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Peerzada AM, O'Donnell C, Adkins S. Biology impact, and management of common sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus L). Acta Physiol Plant. (2019) 41:136. doi: 10.1007/s11738-019-2920-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Soutullo EC, Muñoz CF, Paz RM, Alonso RM, Boente MJR. Hierbas medicinales: uso en la cultura gallega. Revbigo. (2015) 7:105–112. Available online at: http://revbigo.webs.uvigo.es/images/revbigo/2015/Revbigo_2015.pdf

Google Scholar

86. Zhou YX, Xin HL, Rahman K, Wang SJ, Peng C, Zhang H. Portulaca oleracea L.: a review of phytochemistry and pharmacological effects. BioMed Res Int. (2015) 2015:925631. doi: 10.1155./2015/925631

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Angelini LG, Carpanese G, Cioni PL, Morelli I, Macchia M, Flamini G. Essential Oils from Mediterranean Lamiaceae as Weed Germination Inhibitors. J Agric Food Chem. (2003) 51:6158–64. doi: 10.1021/jf0210728

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Christenhusz MJ. Tropaeolum majus. Curtis's Bot Mag. (2012) 29:331–40. doi: 10.1111/curt.12002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Jaiswal S, Rajwade D. A Review on Portulaca oleracea (Nonia bhaji): a wonderful weed of Chhattisgarh. Res J Pharm Technol. (2017) 10:415–20. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00426.7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Fayette J, Hendricks KE, Ozores-Hampton M, Gioia D, Roberts FPD. First report of powdery mildew caused by Oidiopsis haplophylli on garden nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus L.) in Florida. Plant Dis. (2016) 100:646. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-15-0697-PDN

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Gómez-Bellver C, Álvarez H, Sáez L. New contributions to the knowledge of the alien flora of the Barcelona province (Catalonia, Spain). Orsis. (2016) 30:167–89. doi: 10.5565/rev/orsis.36

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Conde-Hernández LA, Guerrero-Beltrán JÁ. Total phenolics and antioxidant activity of Piper auritum and Porophyllum ruderale. Food Chem. (2014) 142:455–60. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.07, 078.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Pignone D, Martínez-Laborde JB. “Diplotaxis”. In: Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resource. editor, Kole C,. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. (2011) p. 137–147.

Google Scholar

94. Lentini F, Venza F. Wild food plants of popular use in Sicily. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine. (2007) 3:15. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-3-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: volatile profiles, differentiating aroma, undervalued species, organoleptic qualities, seasonality

Citation: Fukalova Fukalova T, Moreno-Peris E, García-Martínez MD and Raigón Jiménez MD (2022) Assessment of the Volatile Profiles and Identification of Differentiating Aromas of Wild Undervalued Plants. Front. Nutr. 9:912680. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.912680

Received: 04 April 2022; Accepted: 24 May 2022;
Published: 08 July 2022.

Edited by:

Márta Ladányi, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Hungary

Reviewed by:

Delphine Maya Pott, University of Malaga, Spain
Abhishek Kumar Dwivedy, Banaras Hindu University, India

Copyright © 2022 Fukalova Fukalova, Moreno-Peris, García-Martínez and Raigón Jiménez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: María Dolores Raigón Jiménez, mdraigon@qim.upv.es

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.