Alessandro Iellamo
Bindi Borg
Julie P. Smith
Seema Mihrshahi- 1FHI 360, Washington, DC, United States
- 2Department of Health Systems and Populations, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- 3Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- 4Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- 5School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Editorial on the Research Topic
If maternal breastfeeding is not possible: exploring safe and sustainable infant feeding options in all contexts
Introduction
Breastfeeding is the biological and normative standard for infant and young child feeding. It has been proven to reduce infant mortality and morbidity, enhance immunity, and support cognitive development (1–5). However, in both development and humanitarian contexts, there are circumstances in which maternal breastfeeding is not possible due to maternal death, illness, separation, or cultural and structural barriers (6, 7). The infant separated from their mother who is incarcerated or in detention should also be considered (8, 9). In such situations, the critical question is how to ensure that infants receive safe, appropriate, and sustainable alternatives to maternal breastfeeding (7).
This Frontiers in Nutrition Research Topic, titled “If maternal breastfeeding is not possible: exploring safe and sustainable infant feeding options in all contexts,” brings together a set of pioneering contributions that examine ethical, operational, and scientific considerations in non-breastfed infant feeding. The studies emphasize that every infant has the right to safe nutrition, and that human milk whether maternal, expressed, donated, or wet-nursed—must remain the preferred option (Abdelrahmman et al., Conboy-Stephenson et al., Pramono and Hikmawati, Gawrońska et al.).
The evidence: breastfeeding and breastmilk over commercial milk formula
Evidence overwhelmingly supports the superiority of breastfeeding over breastmilk substitutes (BMS), in terms of survival and health outcomes in both high and low-resource settings Gawrońska et al., (10–31). This also applies to the preferability of breastmilk or donor milk feeding. A comparative analysis of feeding options confirms that alternatives such as wet nursing, maternal expressed breastmilk, and donor human milk (DHM) provide far greater protection against morbidity and mortality than formula. Infants who are not breastfed face increased risks of diarrhea, pneumonia, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), necrotizing enterocolitis, and long-term conditions such as obesity and type 2 diabetes in all country settings Gawrońska et al., (10–31). Wet nursing, particularly when culturally accepted and properly screened, offers raw, immunologically active milk. Because it is a closed biosystem of mouth-to-nipple, it eliminates the risks associated with expressing, storing, transporting and feeding expressed breastmilk. For example, WHO guidance, including during the COVID-19 emergency is that in appropriate circumstances, a suitable wetnurse was an option if the mother was too ill to breastfeed (32) or the new UNICEF Technical and Operational Guidance on Supporting Wet Nursing (33), provides practical suggestions on how to support wet nursing practices in a humanitarian context. There is a need for more systematic country level guidance on implementing this (34). Similarly, maternal expressed milk remains highly protective and practical where direct breastfeeding is interrupted, though the process of expressing and feeding breastmilk introduces potential contamination risk. DHM when correctly screened, pasteurized when used through milk bank, needed, delivered and fed in a cup offers substantial protective value, especially in neonatal and emergency settings Gawrońska et al., (10–31). In contrast, BMS poses significant risks, especially in emergencies, including dependency on supply chains, unsafe preparation, and loss of critical immunological protection (35–39).
OG-IFE: global guidance in emergencies
The Operational Guidance on Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies (OG-IFE), developed by the Emergency Nutrition Network (ENN) and the Infant Feeding in Emergencies Core Group (IFE CG) (7) provides the World Health Assembly endorsed framework for safe infant feeding during crises (40, 41). OG-IFE underscores that breastfeeding should be protected, promoted, and supported at all levels of emergency preparedness and response. When breastfeeding is not possible, the guidance prioritizes the use of alternatives in the following order: re-lactation, wet nursing, maternal expressed breastmilk, donor human milk, and lastly, infant formula only under strict criteria with full support and monitoring. Humanitarian agencies should not risk being the Trojan horse for industry marketing in emergencies.
OG-IFE also emphasizes the critical importance of appropriate complementary feeding from 6 to 23 months and the regulation of BMS, including prohibition of donations and adherence to the International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes (42). Multisectoral coordination, particularly with health, WASH, protection, and food systems is essential to enable safe infant feeding responses (7). In particular, experience shows that mother-baby areas are critical for protecting, promoting and supporting IYCF practices in emergencies (43–45).
Highlights of this Research Topic
This Research Topic features four contributions that significantly advance the understanding and operationalization of infant feeding options beyond maternal breastfeeding.
Wet nursing: culture, risk, and implementation needs
Abdelrahmman et al. explore the acceptability and implementation barriers of wet nursing in emergencies. Drawing on interviews with breastfeeding counselors, the authors highlighted seven themes including HIV-related stigma, trust issues, lack of protocols, and cultural perceptions of wet nursing. The study calls for the integration of wet nursing into emergency protocols with safeguards, informed consent, and culturally sensitive counseling.
Preserving donor milk quality
Conboy-Stephenson et al., in their review, examine how different processing technologies affect the microbiological safety and nutritional integrity of donor human milk. Holder pasteurization, though widely used, significantly reduces lactoferrin, IgA, and other immune components. Importantly for low resource settings and emergencies, the authors advocate for low-impact technologies that preserve more of the milk's bioactivity without compromising safety.
Media and public perception in Indonesia
Pramono and Hikmawati conduct a media content analysis of donor human milk discourse in Indonesia. Their findings reveal that while some narratives support donor milk, widespread misinformation and limited regulation generate public confusion and resistance. The authors recommend improved communication strategies tailored to religious and cultural contexts.
Resilient milk banking in emergencies
Gawrońska et al. compare Poland's milk banking response to COVID-19 and the Ukrainian refugee crisis. The study shows how decentralized operations, flexible logistics, and proactive donor engagement ensured continuity of DHM services in both crises. Their findings offer a practical model for integrating milk banking into emergency preparedness frameworks, which is particularly crucial for the most vulnerable infants.
Conclusion: a call to action
This editorial and the contributions to this Research Topic reaffirm a critical truth: when maternal breastfeeding is not possible, the human right of every infant to receive safe, nutritious, and appropriate feeding must not be compromised. Human milk, whether through maternal expression, wet nursing, or donor human milk, is not merely an alternative; it is a life-saving intervention that must be prioritized, safeguarded, and systematically supported (46).
Infant formula may be necessary in rare circumstances. In those situations, its use must be governed by strict protocols, and only in the context of skilled counseling on breastfeeding, relactation, wet nursing, and strong monitoring mechanisms to prevent harm (7). Unregulated or inappropriate formula use, especially in emergency settings, may seem an immediate and convenient solution but results in serious health risks and long-term consequences for infant survival and development (35–38).
In an era of escalating humanitarian emergencies, pandemics, and climate-induced displacement, infant and young child feeding (IYCF) is a lifesaving intervention. It cannot be an afterthought. Global and national actors must urgently operationalize the OG-IFE as a core element of emergency preparedness, health system resilience, and humanitarian response.
Central to this agenda is the urgent need to invest consistently and on a scale in activities that promote, protect, and support breastfeeding, and ensure access to safe, age-appropriate complementary feeding while continuing breastfeeding for at least 2 years. This includes building the capacity of frontline workers to support breastfeeding, relactation and wet nursing, establishing human milk banking systems if necessary, supporting community-based counseling networks, and ensuring families have the information, resources, and environments they need to nourish their children.
The evidence, innovations, and experiences presented in this series offer a clear, actionable roadmap. The global community must respond with political will, financial commitment, and coordinated action. The time for debate has passed. We must act decisively and collectively—to uphold the nutritional rights of every infant and young child, in every context.
Author contributions
AI: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. BB: Writing – review & editing. JS: Writing – review & editing. SM: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. (2016) 387:475–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7
2. Horta BL, Loret de Mola C, Victora CG. Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. (2015) 104:30–7. doi: 10.1111/apa.13133
3. Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE, Bhutta ZA, Morris SS. How many child deaths can we prevent this year? Lancet. (2003) 362:65–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13811-1
4. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. (2016) 387:491–504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2
5. Horta BL, Bahl R, Martines JC, Victora CG. Evidence on the Long-Term Effects of Breastfeeding: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (2007).
6. WHO. Guiding Principles for Feeding Infants and Young Children During Emergencies. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO (2014).
7. IFE Core Group. Operational Guidance on Infant Feeding in Emergencies (OG-IFE) version 3.0. (2017).
8. International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN). Children of Incarcerated Parents: Considerations on Infant and Young Child Feeding. Penang: Australian National University (2014). Available online at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/22438057/children-of-incarcerated-parents-considerations-on~infant-ibfan/32011 (Accessed June 20,2025).
9. Inquiry Inquiry into the rights of women and children Submission 20 Gribble K Smith JP. Women in prison and children in care need breastfeeding support too. This is why it's vital they get it. The Conversation (2019). Available online at: https://theconversation.com/mums-in-prison-or-whose-babies-are-in-care-need~breastfeeding-support-too-121039 (Accessed June 20,2025).
10. Victora CG, Smith PG, Vaughan JP, Nobre LC, Lombardi C, Teixeira AM, et al. Infant feeding and deaths due to diarrhea: a case-controlled study. Amer J Epidemiol. (1989) 129:1032–41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115207
11. Arifeen S, Black RE, Antelman G, Baqui A, Caulfield L, Becker S. Exclusive breastfeeding reduces acute respiratory infection and diarrhea deaths among infants in Dhaka slums. Pediatrics. (2001) 108:e67. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.e67
12. Chen A, Rogan WJ. Breastfeeding and the risk of postneonatal death in the United States. Pediatrics. (2004) 113:e435–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.e435
13. Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA, Amenga-Etego S, Owusu-Agyei S. Delayed breastfeeding initiation increases risk of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics. (2006) 117:e380–6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1496
14. Howe-Heyman A, Lutenbacher M. The baby-friendly hospital initiative as an intervention to improve breastfeeding rates: a review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. (2016) 61:77–102. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12376
15. Walters DD, Phan LT, Mathisen R. The cost of not breastfeeding: global results from a new tool. Health Policy Plan. (2019) 34:407–17. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz050
16. Rollins NC, Ndirangu J, Bland RM, Coutsoudis A, Coovadia HM, Newell ML. Exclusive breastfeeding, diarrhoeal morbidity and all-cause mortality in infants of HIV-infected and HIV uninfected mothers: an intervention cohort study in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e81307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081307
17. WHO Recommendations for Care of the Preterm or Low Birth Weight Infant. World Health Organization: Geneva (2022).
18. Quigley M, Embleton ND, McGuire W. Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2019) 7:CD002971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002971.pub5
19. Blackshaw K, Valtchev P, Koolaji N, Berry N, Schindeler A, Dehghani F, et al. The risk of infectious pathogens in breast-feeding, donated human milk and breast milk substitutes. Public Health Nutrition. (2021) 24:1725–40. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000555
20. Beaudry M, Dufour R, Marcoux S. Relation between infant feeding and infections during the first six months of life. J Pediatrics. (1995) 126:191–7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70544-9
21. Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen-Rivers LA. Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula-fed infants. J Pediatr. (1995) 126:696–702. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70395-0
22. Kramer MS, Chalmers B, Hodnett ED, Sevkovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Shapiro S, et al. Promotion of breastfeeding intervention trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA. (2001) 285:413–20. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.4.413
23. Paricio Talayero JM, Lizán-García M, Otero Puime A, Benlloch Muncharaz MJ, Beseler Soto B, Sánchez-Palomares M, et al. Full breastfeeding and hospitalization as a result of infections in the first year of life. Pediatrics. (2006) 118:e92–99. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1629
24. Viggiano D, Fasano D, Monaco G, Strohmenger L. Breast feeding, bottle feeding, and non-nutritive sucking; effects on occlusion in deciduous dentition. Arch Dis Child. (2004) 89:1121–3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.029728
25. Monetini L, Cavallo MG, Stefanini L, Ferrazzoli F, Bizzarri C, Marietti G, et al. Bovine β-casein antibodies in breast- and bottle-fed infants: their relevance in Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. (2001) 17:51–4. doi: 10.1002/1520-7560(2000)9999:9999 < ::aid-dmrr156>3.0.co;2-h
26. Strathearn L, Mamun AA, Najman JM, O'Callaghan MJ. Does breastfeeding protect against substantiated child abuse and neglect? A 15-year cohort study. Pediatrics (2009) 123:483–93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3546
27. Karlson EW, Mandl LA, Hankinson SE, Grodstein F. Do breastfeeding and other reproductive factors influence future risk of rheumatoid arthritis?: Results from the Nurses' Health Study. Arthritis Rheum. (2004) 50:3458–67. doi: 10.1002/art.20621
28. Groër MW. Differences between exclusive breastfeeders, formula-feeders, and controls: a study of stress, mood, and endocrine variables. Biol Res Nurs. (2005) 7:106–17. doi: 10.1177/1099800405280936
29. van Acker J, de Smet F, Muyldermans G, Bougatef A, Naessens A, Lauwers S. Outbreak of necrotizing enterocolitis associated with Enterobacter sakazakii in powdered milk formula. J Clin Microbiol. (2001) 39:293–7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.293-297.2001
30. Weir E. Powdered infant formula and fatal infection with Enterobacter sakazakii. CMAJ. (2002) 166:1570.
31. Hewlett BS, Winn S. Allomaternal nursing in humans. Current Anthropology. (2014) 55:200–29. doi: 10.1086/675657
32. World Health Organization. Breastfeeding and COVID-19: Scientific brief, 23 June 2020. Geneva: WHO (2020). Report No. Available online at https://WHO/2019-nCoV/Sci_Brief/Breastfeeding/2020.1
33. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies Core Group Technical Technical and Operational Guidance on Supporting Wet Nursing in Emergencies. New York: United Nations Children's Fund (2024). Forthcoming.
34. Smith JP, Iellamo A. Wet nursing and donor human milk sharing in emergencies and disasters: a review. Breastfeed Rev. (2020) 28:7–23.
35. Hipgrave DB, Assefa F, Winoto A, Sukotjo S. Donated breast milk substitutes and incidence of diarrhoea among infants and young children after the May 2006 earthquake in Yogyakarta and Central Java. Public Health Nutr. (2012) 15:307–15. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010003423
36. Borrel A, Taylor A, McGrath M, Seal A, Hormann E, Phelps L, et al. From policy to practice: challenges in infant feeding in emergencies during the Balkan crisis. Disasters. (2001) 25:149–63. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00167
37. Creek TL, Kim A, Lu L, Bowen A, Masunge J, Arvelo W, et al. Hospitalization and mortality among primarily nonbreastfed children during a large outbreak of diarrhea and malnutrition in Botswana, 2006. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. (2010) 53:14–9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181bdf676
38. Arvelo W, Kim A, Creek T, Legwaila K, Puhr N, Johnston S, et al. Case-control study to determine risk factors for diarrhea among children during a large outbreak in a country with a high prevalence of HIV infection. Int J Infect Dis. (2010) 14:e1002–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.06.014
39. World Health Assembly editor. World Health Assembly Resolution 63.23. Sixty-Third World Health Assembly (2010).
40. World Health Assembly editor. World Health Assembly Resolution 71.9. Sventy-first World Health Assembly (2018).
41. World Health Organization. International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes. Geneva: World Health Organization (1981).
42. De Brabandere A, David A, Dozio E, Bizouerne C. Baby Friendly Spaces: Holistic Approach for Pregnant, Lactating Women and their very young children in Emergency. Paris, France: Action contre la Faim (2014).
43. Amat Camacho N, von Schreeb J, Della Corte F, Kolokotroni O. Interventions to support the re-establishment of breastfeeding and their application in humanitarian settings: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. (2023) 19:e13440. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13440
44. Hargest-Slade AC, Gribble KD. Shaken but not broken: Supporting breastfeeding women after the 2011 Christchurch New Zealand earthquake. Breastfeed Rev. (2015) 23:7–13.
45. Kent G. Child feeding and human rights. Int Breastfeed J. (2006) 1:27. doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-1-27
Keywords: infant feeding in emergencies, IYCF-E, IYCF, wet nursing, donor milk, breast milk expression, breastfeeding counseling, maternal breastfeeding
Citation: Iellamo A, Borg B, Smith JP and Mihrshahi S (2025) Editorial: If maternal breastfeeding is not possible: exploring safe and sustainable infant feeding options in all contexts. Front. Nutr. 12:1657289. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1657289
Received: 01 July 2025; Accepted: 07 July 2025;
Published: 22 July 2025.
Edited and reviewed by: Mauro Serafini, University of Teramo, Italy
Copyright © 2025 Iellamo, Borg, Smith and Mihrshahi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alessandro Iellamo, YWllbGxhbW9AZmhpMzYwLm9yZw==