Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Nutr., 05 August 2025

Sec. Nutrigenomics

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1666502

This article is part of the Research TopicNutriomic Analysis of Food and Functional Compounds for MAFLD PreventionView all 7 articles

Editorial: Nutriomic analysis of food and functional compounds for MAFLD prevention

  • 1Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • 2Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
  • 3Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de la Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  • 4Red Iberoamericana de Colaboración Académica y Científica en Nutriómicas y Nutrición de Precisión RINN22, Monterrey, Mexico
  • 5Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Bromatología y Nutrición, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina
  • 6Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Técnica (CONICET), Santa Fe, Argentina

This Research Topic aims to collect manuscripts that deepen our understanding of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), with particular emphasis on elucidating the nutriomic effects of foods and functional compounds in the prevention of MAFLD and its associated clinical outcomes. It is important to note that MAFLD was previously referred to as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and recently (1), a new nomenclature has been proposed: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), with all the related conditions encompassed under the broader term “steatotic liver disease” (SLD). MAFLD is currently the most common chronic liver disease, and its global incidence is rising at an alarming rate. Approximately 30% of the adult population worldwide is estimated to be affected, although prevalence rates vary considerable between regions or countries (2). Importantly, the progression, and eventually the regression, of MAFLD appears to be regulated by nutrigenomic and epigenomic factors that represent new therapeutic targets for dietary and lifestyles interventions (3, 4). Therefore, in this Research Topic there are 6 contributions that explore how dietary fatty acids, vitamin D, sodium intake, ultra-processed foods (UPF), gut microbiota, and indexes of inflammation and dietary quality influence the pathogenesis and potential reversal of MASLD/MAFLD.

In the initial manuscript of this Research Topic, Chen et al., based on a large-scale retrospective case-control study (2,470 adults) using data collected in 2017–2018 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), shows that dietary fatty acids (FA), except for polyunsaturated FA (PUFA), may increase the risk of developing NAFLD, particularly in obese individuals aged 37–54 years. Specifically, the authors explored the role of the sex in NAFLD development and found that the ratios of unsaturated FA (UFA)/saturated FA (SFA), PUFA/SFA, monounsaturated FA (MUFA)/SFA, and PUFA/MUFA were associated with NAFLD risk in males, with higher ratios predicting a lower risk. Interestingly, increasing the proportion of unsaturated FA in the diet, especially PUFA, appears to be a promising strategy for preventing NAFLD in middle-aged obese men. Zhang et al. carried out a bibliometric and visual analysis of 359 publications obtained between 2007 and 2024 that explore the link between vitamin D (VD) and metabolism-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), mapping the research landscape, trends, hotspots, and emerging frontiers to guide future investigations. Although it is well-established that VD deficiency is associated with increased prevalence of obesity and MAFLD, the effectiveness of VD supplementation in improving MAFLD outcomes remains controversial and requires further investigation. Li et al. throughout a longitudinal cohort study analyzed the relationship between sodium intake and the incidence and all-cause mortality of NAFLD. The analysis included data from 13,853 American adults by comprehensively reviewing the literature and analyzing data from The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2003–2018), including 4,465 participants with NAFLD. The findings suggest that higher sodium intake in individuals with NAFLD is associated with increased disease incidence but decreased all-cause mortality. Notably, the dose–response relationship between sodium intake and mortality risk exhibited a non-linear pattern, with a critical inflection point around 3.5 grams per day. Following the manuscripts addressing the interaction between nutrients and MAFLD, Shi et al. have studied the impact of UPF on liver health in rats and explored the role of gut microbiota and metabolites. They have observed that UPF increased potentially harmful bacteria in the gut microbiota and led to a metabolomic disorder characterized by disruptions in the sphingolipid signaling pathway, sulfur relay system, and arachidonic acid metabolism. Sang et al. explored the association between the Dietary Inflammation Index (DII) and other indicators of liver disease severity like hepatic fibrosis and the Fatty Liver Index (FLI) within a cohort of U.S. adults diagnosed with MASLD. They describe that no meaningful statistical relationship exists between DII scores and the risk of liver fibrosis or increased FLI and emphasizes that dietary factors should be carefully considered in the clinical evaluation of disease progression in patients with MASLD. Finally, Huang et al. explored the influence of five dietary quality indexes on mortality among NAFLD patients and advanced fibrosis patients, and discovered that a high-quality diet could potentially mitigate mortality risk in both groups of patients. These results reinforce the idea that nutritional strategies may serve as an effective, non-pharmacological approach to reducing mortality rates and improving outcomes.

As a conclusion, the studies included in this Research Topic provide valuable insights into the comprehension of MAFLD and its associated comorbidities, highlighting the role of foods, nutrients and gut microbiota. The conclusions presented in this Research Topic may serve as a useful reference for both the prevention and treatment of MAFLD, as well as offer meaningful guidance for future research. However, the manuscripts published in this Research Topic also underscore that many aspects of the complex interplay between nutrition and MAFLD remain to be fully elucidated, and new additions can be added to the consensus statements that currently lay the foundation for customized dietary guidelines (5).

Author contributions

FM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol. (2023) 79:1542–56. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101133

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, Paik JM, Henry A, Van Dongen C, Henry L. The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review. Hepatology. (2023) 77:1335–47. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ha S, Wong VW, Zhang X, Yu J. Interplay between gut microbiome, host genetic and epigenetic modifications in MASLD and MASLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. (2025) 74:141–52. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332398

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Alharthi J, Pan Z, Gloss BS, McLeod D, Weltman M, George J, et al. Loss of metabolic adaptation in lean MAFLD is driven by endotoxemia leading to epigenetic reprogramming. Metabolism. (2023) 144:155583. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155583

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zeng XF, Varady KA, Wang XD, Targher G, Byrne CD, Tayyem R, et al. The role of dietary modification in the prevention and management of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: an international multidisciplinary expert consensus. Metabolism. (2024) 161:156028. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2024.156028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: microbiota, vitamin D, sodium, NAFLD, MASLD, MAFLD, inflammation, ultra-processed food

Citation: Milagro FI and Bernal CA (2025) Editorial: Nutriomic analysis of food and functional compounds for MAFLD prevention. Front. Nutr. 12:1666502. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1666502

Received: 15 July 2025; Accepted: 23 July 2025;
Published: 05 August 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: Annalisa Terranegra, Sidra Medicine, Qatar

Copyright © 2025 Milagro and Bernal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Claudio A. Bernal, Y2Jlcm5hbEBmYmNiLnVubC5lZHUuYXI=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.