Global trends in the research on Legg–Calve–Perthes disease in Web of Science

Introduction

Legg–Calve–Perthes disease (LCPD) is a complex condition affecting the capital femoral epiphysis of the femoral head in children (1). The incidence of LCPD can vary from 0.4 to 29.0 children per 100,000 children under the age of 15 years, with the peak incidence in children aged 4–8 years (2–4). Although it has been widely studied, the etiology of LCPD remains unknown. Evidence showed that it may involve various factors, including genes associated with coagulation and fibrinolysis, proinflammatory factors, and vasoactive substances (5, 6). If appropriate measures are not taken at an early stage, developing degenerative changes associated with arthritis may eventually lead to total hip arthroplasty. Thus, a quantitative analysis of the current states, focal areas, and prospects for LCPD is necessary.

Bibliometrics is an interdisciplinary discipline that could statistically and mathematically analyze publications, including books and periodicals (7). Increasing evidence suggests that bibliometrics has greatly contributed to research trends in medical domains, such as cardiovascular diseases (8), gastrointestinal diseases (9), and diabetes (10). In addition, it can provide reliable data that can be used to expose the research frontier as a handy technique. Although research on LCPD has boomed in recent years, few systematic analyses of these articles using bibliometric analysis have been reported. Hence, the current research aimed to systematically evaluate the international publication productivity of LCPD research, analyze the trends and hotspots, as well as the collaboration and influence among countries, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords of LCPD using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) from 1 January 2000 to 30 June 2023.

Methods

Data source

Learning from previous research strategies, we selected the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) within the WoSCC database as the data source for this study (11–13). Considering the rapid updation of the database and the avoidance of bias as much as possible, the literature search was completed in 1 day (11 August 2023). To identify all publications, we used “Legg–Calve–Perthes disease” as the TOPIC. A total of 673 relevant publications were finally obtained.

Bibliometric analysis

The exported publications in a plain text format with “full record and cited references” were named as the file “lcpd_xxx.txt.” and imported to VOSviewer 1.6.19 for further analysis. The Bibliometrix package in R 4.3.1 was used for scientific knowledge map visualization. In VOSviewer, we set the normalization method to association strength and set the minimum thresholds for countries, institutions, authors, keywords, and journals to default value. In addition, GraphPad Prism 8.0 and Adobe Illustrator 15.0.0 were used to generate the figures.

Results

Overview of LCPD publications

A total of 673 publications, mainly including 587 articles and 33 reviews, were retrieved from WoSCC (Table 1). Figure 1A depicts the yearly number of publications related to LCPD, which increased from 15 in 2000 to 26 in the first half of 2023, peaking at 53 in 2022. The total citation number of the retrieved articles was 8,813, which increased from 1 in 2000 to 427 in the first half of 2023, peaking at 935 in 2022; the average citation number per article was 13.21. The H-index for these publications was 42, according to data from the website. The polynomial fitting curve of the annual trend of publications is shown in Figure 1B. Although there were large fluctuations over the years, the overall trend showed that the total number of articles published increased, with a correlation coefficient of R² = 0.997. These data indicate that the research on LCPD has become the focus of attention and has made rapid progress. Figure 1C depicts the geographical distribution of all papers on LCPD research across all countries and regions. As the figure shows the United States emerged as the country with the highest number of published papers, which not only demonstrates the high productivity of the United States but also shows its significant importance to the study of LCPD. Figure 1D shows the corelationships between different countries in the context of LCPD. It shows that each country has a corelationship with other countries, and especially, the United States, which occupies the most published papers, cooperates closely with every other country.

Table 1

Table 1. Categories of PLCD publications.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Overview of LCPD publications. (A) Number of annual research publications and growth trends on the associations of LCPD from 2000 to 2023. (B) Curve fitting of publications’ overall yearly growth trend. (C) Geographical distribution of publications on LCPD research from 2000 to 2023. (D) Corelationships between different countries on the publication of LCPD.

Contributions of countries/regions

A total of 53 regions were included in our data (Supplementary Table 1). Figure 2A depicts the top five high-output countries and regions for all writers in the last two decades. It indicates that the articles from the United States largely determined the trend of global publications. Figure 2B shows the United States published the most papers (239/35.51%), followed by Germany (51/7.58%), England (43/6.38%), South Korea (42/6.24%), and China (5.35/36%). Publications from the United States were cited 4,816 times, accounting for 54.61% of the total citations, followed by South Korea (698) and England (607). Moreover, the H-index of the United States was the highest (37), followed by England (14) and South Korea (11). Interestingly, compared to Germany, South Korea had a relatively lower number of papers but a much higher citation count and H-index, suggesting that South Korea has a more influential impact in the field of LCPD (Table 2). Figure 2C shows that the United States was the main continent for LCPD research, collaborating closely with many countries, including Canada, Japan, England, and China. Figure 2D presents the distributions of the countries according to the average occurrence time, with purple indicating the earlier, while yellow indicating the later. As we can see in the chart, the United States, Germany, South Korea, and France were among the countries that published earlier, while India, Mexico, and Australia were among the countries that published more recently, indicating that LCPD research is gradually receiving attention from countries around the world.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Cooperative relationships between different countries and regions. (A) Time histogram of LCPD from the top five high-output countries and regions. (B) Citation reports for the top five countries and regions. (C) Network of different countries’ visualization. Each node represents one country. The circle size is based on the number of publications. Connecting lines represent collaboration between countries. Different colors represent different items. (D) Distribution of countries according to the average time of occurrence. Green and blue circles indicate more past publications, and yellow circles indicate more recent publications.

Table 2

Table 2. Top five countries/regions ranked by the number of publications.

Leading productive institutions

In our data, 916 institutions involved in LCPD were detected (Supplementary Table 2). Figure 3A lists the top 10 productive institutions. Specifically, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children has 51 papers, followed by the University of Texas System (44) and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas (42). Interestingly, we found that only 2 of these top 10 most productive institutions, the University of Bern and the University Hospital of Bern, were from Switzerland, while the remaining 8 institutions were all from the United States. This result once again highlights the significance of articles from the United States in determining the global publication trends. As shown in Figure 3B and Table 3, the 51 publications from Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children in the United States ranked first with 2,608 citations (51.13 citations per article), and the H-index was 21. It is worth noting that in terms of the quality of articles, the H-index values of these 10 institutions differ slightly, which suggests there was no significant gap between institutions. In addition, VOS viewer analysis was also performed to detect the relationships among these institutions. Figure 3C shows that the institutions were divided into four clusters, with Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children collaborating closely with many other institutions. Figure 3D presents the distribution of the institutions based on the mean occurrence time, where blue indicates earlier publication and yellow indicates later publication. As we can learn from this figure, Shriners Hosp Children was the institution with the largest number of publications on LCPD in earlier times, while the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas was more recent.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Most productive institutions and their collaborations. (A) Top 10 institutions involved in research on LCPD. (B) Distribution of citations (×100), citation frequency per paper, and H-index of the top 10 institutions. (C) Network of different institutions’ visualization. Each node represents one institution. The circle size is based on the number of publications. Connecting lines represent collaboration between countries. Different colors represent different items. (D) Distribution of institutions according to the average time of occurrence. Green and blue circles indicate more past publications, and yellow circles indicate more recent publications.

Table 3

Table 3. Top 10 institutions ranked by the number of publications.

Language distributions

Seven languages related to publications of LCPD were listed in this research (Figure 4A). As expected, English ranked first with 640 publications, followed by German with 22. French ranked third with seven publications. In addition, we found a fluctuating but gradually increasing trend in English publications from 15 in 2000 to 49 in 2022 (Figure 4B). The number of German publications (second), however, did not show an increasing trend (Figure 4C). This reason may be related to the gradual development of English as a global language in the past 20 years.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Most productive languages in LCPD. (A) Most published language for research in LCPD. (B) Annual global number of LCPD publications published in English. (C) Annual global number of LCPD publications published in German.

Distribution of authors

A total of 2,205 researchers associated with the LCPD publications were identified in our data (Supplementary Table 3). Ranking by the number of papers, the top 10 most productive authors were Kim HKW (57, the United States), Tannast M (14, Switzerland), Joseph B (13, India), Siebenrock KA (13, Switzerland), Steppacher SD (13, Switzerland), Herring JA (12, the United States), Sankar WN (12, the United States), Hailer YD (11, Sweden), Krauspe R (11, Deutschland), Rowe SM (10, South Korea), and Shah H (10, India) (Figure 5A and Table 4). We found that the most productive paper-published author, Kim HKW, works at Scottish Rite Children (2222 Welborn St, Dallas, TX, the United States), which may explain why Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children and the United States were the most productive paper-published institution and region, respectively (Figures 3A,B). The H-index of Kim HKW was 20, which means that 20 papers have each been cited at least 20 times in his published papers (Figure 5B). These results indicate Kim HKW is the most productive author in the field of LCPD. In addition, we found that Herring JA ranked sixth in terms of the number of publications; however, his average citation was the highest, suggesting that Herring JA is the most influential author in the field of LCPD. We further detected the top 10 most cited papers related to LCPD and found that two papers of Herring JA ranked first and third, both published in 2004 (Table 5). Furthermore, to detect the relationships among these authors, VOSviewer analysis was also performed in our research. Figures 5C,D demonstrate that the authors were divided into three clusters, with Kim HKW, as the most influential author, collaborating closely with many other authors.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Most productive authors and their collaborations. (A) Distribution of publications, total citations (×100), citation frequency per paper, and H-index of the top 10 authors. (B) Time histogram of LCPD from the top 10 high-output authors. (C) Network of different authors’ visualization. Each node represents one author. The circle size is based on the number of publications. Connecting lines represent collaboration between authors. Different colors represent different items. (D) Density map showing the heatmap of authors during the period from 1 January 2000 to 30 June 2023.

Table 4

Table 4. Top 10 authors ranked by the number of publications.

Table 5

Table 5. Top 10 papers with the highest citations.

Top 10 most cited papers

The top 10 most cited papers are listed in Table 5. The most frequent one was a prospective multicenter study we mentioned earlier, “Legg–Calve–Perthes disease. Part II: Prospective multicenter study of the effect of treatment on outcome” by Herring JA et al. (14) in 2004, which was cited 231 times. The researchers enrolled 438 cases of 451 hip Perthes disease from 38 institutions in the United States. They found that Stulberg grading evaluation after bone maturation showed that grade I or II was excellent, and the incidence rate of patients younger than 8 years old was significantly higher than that of patients older than 8 years old. The second most cited paper was “Arthroscopic Capsular Plication and Labral Preservation in Borderline Hip Dysplasia Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of a Surgical Approach to a Challenging Problem” by Domb BG et al. (15) in 2013, which was cited 219 times so far. The authors found that the arthroscopic approach was beneficial to patients with borderline dysplasia. The third paper was “Legg–Calve–Perthes disease. Part I: Classification of radiographs with use of the modified lateral pillar and Stulberg classifications” by Herring JA et al. (16) in 2004, which was cited 182 times. In this study, Herring proposed to improve the lateral column classification on the basis of the original classification (17), which was published in his paper “The lateral pillar classification of Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease” in 1992, namely, to add B/C type between the original B type and C type; the results indicated that the modified lateral pillar classification and the redefined Stulberg classification were sufficiently reliable and accurate for use in studies of LCPD.

Journal distributions

A total of 199 journals were detected in this study (Supplementary Table 4). We further identified the top 10 journals with the most numbers of publications related to LCPD (Table 6). The results showed that the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (IF = 2.5372, 2021) publishes the most number of LCPD papers with 89, followed by the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B (IF = 1.4730, 2021) with 56, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (IF = 4.8371, 2021) with 40, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume (IF = 6.5581, 2021) with 32, and International Orthopaedics with 22 (IF = 3.4793, 2021) (Table 6). Interestingly, the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics has the greatest number of publications related to LCPD, but the citation count only ranks second with 1,093. On the contrary, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume ranks fourth according to the number of publications, but it ranks first in the number of citations with 1,351. We also detected the quartile in the category of these journals according to the Journal Citation Report (JCR) 2023. The results showed that Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume were classified in Q1, while International Orthopaedics, the Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, and Pediatric Radiology were classified in Q2. The most productive journal, the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, was classified in Q3, as well as Hip International and the Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics. Only one journal, the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B, was classified in Q4. In addition, VOSviewer analysis was also performed to detect the distributions of LCPD publications in our research. The result showed that the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics occupies the most cooperation number with other journals (Figure 6A) and is one of the earliest journals involved in LCPD (Figure 6B). It is worth noting that the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that mainly focuses specifically on traumatic injuries, according to its website. In addition, there were some new journals, according to the average time of occurrence in Figure 6B, such as the Journal of Children’s Orthopaed (IF = 1.9168, 2021), Children-Basel (IF = 2.8350, 2021), and Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (IF = 7.5065, 2021).

Table 6

Table 6. Top 10 journals with the highest numbers of publications.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Coauthorship map of high-yielding journals. (A) In the visualization map, one node represents a journal, and its size is proportional to the number of publications. Different colors represent different items. (B) Distribution of journals according to the average time of occurrence. Green and blue circles indicate more earlier publications, and yellow circles indicate more recent publications.

Keyword distributions

We further performed VOSviewer analysis of the co-occurring keywords. The result indicated that the keywords could mainly be divided into six categories, including “symptom (red),” “imageology (purple),” “mechanism (dark blue),” “etiology (yellow),” “prognosis (green),” and “treatment (light blue)” (Figure 7A). In the “symptom” group, the most popular keywords were “femoroacetabular impingement,” “dysplasia,” and “pain.” These keywords accurately describe the typical characteristics of LCPD. In the “imageology” group, the most popular keywords were “MRI” and “arthrography,” which represent the popular detection methods currently. In the “mechanism” group, “Legg–Calve–Perthes disease” was the most frequent in many papers (Figure 7A) and appeared to be one of the earliest keywords, also (Figure 7B). Moreover, we noticed that “epiphysis,” “angiogenesis,” and “interleukin-6” had the most occurrences in the “mechanism” group. It is worth noting that “interleukin-6” was a new keyword appearing in LCPD recent year (Figure 7B). Li et al. (18) reported that LCPD patients usually have a high level of interleukin-6 in their plasma, and the high concentration of interleukin-6 can prompt human umbilical vein endothelial cells to secrete CD31⁺/CD42b⁻ endothelial microparticles, which in turn promote endothelial cell apoptosis and endothelial dysfunction and inhibit angiogenesis. In the “etiology” group, the most popular keywords were “children,” “epidemiology,” and “mutation,” indicating that the research trend of LCPD is moving toward mutations in children. In the “prognosis” group, we noticed “classification” and “prognosis,” suggesting that the outcome was associated with the disease classification. In the “treatment” group, “osteotomy” was the most prevalent keyword. Evidence indicated that osteotomy shows improved clinical and radiological outcomes in children with LCPD (19–21).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Co-occurrence network of keywords. (A) Lines between nodes represent co-occurrence between different keywords. Each node represents one keyword. The circle size is based on the number of occurrences. Different colors represent different items. (B) Distribution of keywords according to the average time of occurrence. Green and blue circles indicate more earlier publications, and yellow circles indicate more recent publications.

Discussion

This was the first bibliometrics analysis on LCPD worldwide, aiming to detect the trends and research hotspots of LCPD based on the WoSCC database. Herein, 673 papers were retrieved from 1 January 2000 to 30 June 2023. According to the polynomial fitting curve (Figure 1), although the number of published papers fluctuated less over the two decades, the overall trend was toward more and more published papers. This also indicates that more and more researchers are interested in the topic of LCPD.

Publications were distributed all over the world, but productivity was modest in many places. In this dataset, the United States rated first in the number of publications among the top 10 countries and regions, indicating a very productive country in LCPD research (Figure 2). Among the top 10 institutions and authors in the field of LCPD research, the United States has 8 institutions and 3 scholars, indicating that the United States has the most outstanding institutions and expert scholars, which helps explain why the United States has had such an impact on the topic over the past 20 years. Moreover, the United States has the highest H-index among these countries. It may be because researchers in the United States first proposed the treatment and care for LCPD (14, 16). In addition, the United States has been more intensively studying this issue than other countries around the globe. This suggests that Chinese scholars and institutions in this field should improve the quality of their work.

Institutions are important places for research. In this research, we found that almost all of the top 10 institutions ranking with the most publications came from the United States, demonstrating its strong scholarly competence in this field (Figure 3). Kim HKW, Tannast M, and Joseph B were the top three scholars in the research on LCPD based on the number of publications (Figure 5). Therefore, to keep up with the latest developments in this field, we should pay more attention to their work and give it higher priority. Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children was the most productive institution, with 51 published articles and 1,330 citations, followed by the University of Texas System (44 published articles, 595 citations) and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas (42 published articles, 585 citations). Interestingly, Kim HKW, who is affiliated with the University of Texas System, has authored the majority of the papers. The highest cited article of Kim HKW was a review published in 2012, which introduced the pathophysiology and new strategies for the treatment of LCPD (86 citations) (22) and provided clinicians with strategies for the treatment and prevention of LCPD. It is worth noting that Kim HKW's latest study aimed at measuring the brace adherence of the A-frame, an equipment used to contain the deformed femoral head and improve femoral head remodeling in patients with LCPD using temperature sensors, and to identify factors that influence adherence. The study found that the compliance of A-frame braces was significantly associated with age at the time of treatment, previous Petrie casting, and daily prescribed brace wear (23). This latest study provides new insights and suggestions for the treatment and prevention of LCPD.

Among the top 10 most cited articles, studies on human LCPD treatment accounted for 90% (9/10), while only one paper was related to dogs, indicating that research on human LCPD treatment is a hot topic of interest for most scholars (Table 5). Three scholars whose articles have been cited over 150 times were Herring JA, Domb BG, and LaFond E. Herring JA's article, published in 2004, occupied the highest number of citations and ranked first. The research illustrated that Stulberg grading evaluation after bone maturation showed that grade I or II was excellent, and the incidence rate of patients younger than 8 years old was significantly higher than that of patients older than 8 years old. Therefore, the highest citation count indicates that other scholars have given his work a high degree of recognition (14). What is more, Domb et al. (24) presented acetabular dysplasia as a developmental malformation that results in poor coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum, a tendency for subluxation or dislocation of the joint, shallow acetabulum, and outward centrality of the hip joint in this study. In addition, the studies of LaFond et al. (25) served to increase the impact of veterinarians on developmental straightening disease and promote control of this disease by identifying breeds that may benefit from environmental interventions such as breeding programs or ecological interventions. It is worth noting that LaFond E, a veterinarian, authored the only paper related to animals, ranking No.4 of the top 10 most cited papers, indicating that his work was highly acknowledged by other scholars.

The view of keywords (Figures 7A,B) revealed that the hot topic people have always been concerned about all the time was “Legg–Calve–Perthes disease.” Based on the clustering, we found that most of the research studies focused on the “symptom (red),” “mechanism (dark blue),” and “prognosis (green)” studies of LCPD. From this perspective, it can be seen that in the last two decades, scholars have attached great importance to investigating the causes and mechanisms of LCPD.

It also implies that most research on LCPD has focused on its causes, mechanisms, and treatment methods. As far as we know, the mechanism of LCPD remains to be fully detailed. An article details that LCPD patients usually have a high level of interleukin-6 in their plasma, and the high concentration of interleukin-6 can prompt human umbilical vein endothelial cells to secrete CD31⁺/CD42b⁻ endothelial microparticles, which lead to endothelial cell apoptosis and dysfunction, as well as inhibit angiogenesis (18). Thus, we can conduct more research on interleukin-6 to unveil the cause of LCPD in the future.

Notably, the top 10 most prolific journals exhibit a modestly low IF, which is one of the important indexes to evaluate the influence of SCI journals (Table 6). This indicates that publishing research on LCPD in high-quality journals remains challenging. Among these journals, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume has the highest IF. In contrast, the IF of other journals ranges only from 1 to 3. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, namely, JBJS, belongs to the top journals in orthopedic and publishes evidence-based research to improve the quality of care for orthopedic patients. JBJS, the journal committed to providing the best research data in the world, has been the most respected source of information for orthopedic surgeons and researchers for over 100 years and is the gold standard for peer-reviewed research information in the field of orthopedics. Thus, although the number of publications in JBJS was not the highest, the total citations indicate its significant impact. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, namely, CORR, ranking second in IF among these 10 journals, is committed to disseminating new and important orthopedic knowledge and is a leading peer-reviewed orthopedic journal and a publication of the Society of Bone and Joint Surgeons. CORR brings readers the latest clinical and basic research as well as informed opinions that shape plastic surgery practice today, thus providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. In addition, we also noticed that the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, which has an IF lower than 3, publishes the most number of papers; however, the citations were not the most. These results indicate that a journal with a large number of publications does not necessarily have a large impact.

This study conducted a comprehensive visual analysis of LCPD in a clear and objective manner. However, there were some limitations that need to be considered. First, this analysis only relied on the WoSCC database and ignores other databases, such as PubMed and Scopus, which may result in a limited extraction of publications. However, the WoSCC database includes influential and high-quality journals, providing a wide range of citation index records, making it suitable for scientific and bibliometric analysis. Second, this study did not include articles earlier than 2000, potentially overlooking several high-quality publications. However, due to the extensive coverage of authoritative and influential academic journals in research, the results and findings remain robust (26).

Conclusions

This analysis shows that the number of published papers on LCPD research has fluctuated slightly in the last two decades. However, the overall trend indicates that more and more articles are being published. This indicates that the research on LCPD has good research prospects. The United States emerged as a major producer country with more significant influence in this field. Osteotomy remains an important way to improve the clinical outcome in children with LCPD. In recent years, the clinical and molecular biology research related to LCPD has attracted widespread attention, with interleukin-6 becoming a potential hotspot in LCPD research. The research in this article will help scholars better understand the current status of LCPD research from a large perspective.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

WQ: Data curation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MH: Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing. HQ: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. QW: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. HY: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This research was funded by the Guangxi Key R&D Program (Grant number: GuiKe AB22035014) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 82360822).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the editors and the reviewers for their insightful suggestions on this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2024.1335118/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Table 1
All countries’/regions’ distribution.

Supplementary Table 2
All institutions’ distribution.

Supplementary Table 3
All authors’ distribution.

Supplementary Table 4
All journals’ distribution.

References

1. Regan CM, Su AW, Stans AA, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN, Shaughnessy WJ, et al. Long-term outcomes at skeletal maturity of combined pelvic and femoral osteotomy for the treatment of Legg‒Calve‒Perthes disease. J Clin Med. (2023) 12(17):5718. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175718

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Rodríguez-Olivas AO, Hernández-Zamora E, Reyes-Maldonado E. Legg‒Calvé‒Perthes disease overview. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2022) 17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02275-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ikegami A, Oka Y, Yamazoe S, Takahashi K. Long-term survival after femoral anterior rotational osteotomy for late-onset Legg‒Calvé‒Perthes disease: a case report with 27-year follow-up? J Orthop Case Reports. (2023) 13(7):14–9. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i07.3738

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Pavone V, Chisari E, Vescio A, Lizzio C, Sessa G, Testa G. Aetiology of Legg‒Calvé‒Perthes disease: a systematic review. World J Orthop. (2019) 10(3):145–65. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i3.145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gagala J, Buraczynska M, Mazurkiewicz T, Ksiazek A. Prevalence of genetic risk factors related with thrombophilia and hypofibrinolysis in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head in Poland. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2013) 14:264. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-264

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Matuszewska A, Sygacz O, Matuszewski Ł, Stec S, Grzegorzewski A, Gągała J. Association between polymorphism eNOS4, tPA, factor V Leiden, prothrombin, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and the occurrence of Legg‒Calvé‒Perthes disease. J Clin Med. (2023) 12(16):5209. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165209

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Van Raan A. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. TATuP-Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis. (2003) 12(1):20–9. doi: 10.14512/tatup.12.1.20

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Shuaib W, Khan MS, Shahid H, Valdes EA, Alweis R. Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited cardiovascular articles. Am J Cardiol. (2015) 115(7):972–81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Narotsky D, Green PH, Lebwohl B. Temporal and geographic trends in celiac disease publications: a bibliometric analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2012) 24(9):1071–7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328355a4ab

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Geaney F, Scutaru C, Kelly C, Glynn RW, Perry IJ. Type 2 diabetes research yield, 1951–2012: bibliometrics analysis and density-equalizing mapping. PLoS One. (2015) 10(7):e0133009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Li F, Zhang D, Chen J, Tang K, Li X, Hou Z. Research hotspots and trends of brain-computer interface technology in stroke: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis. Front Neurosci. (2023) 17:1243151. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1243151

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Yang J, Wu J, Han T, Lu H, Li F, Li L, et al. Global research hotspots and frontiers of myasthenia gravis from 2002 to 2021: a bibliometric study. Medicine (Baltimore). (2023) 102(24):e34002. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hou Z, Wang W, Su S, Chen Y, Chen L, Lu Y, et al. Bibliometric and visualization analysis of biomechanical research on lumbar intervertebral disc. J Pain Res. (2023) 16:3441–62. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S428991

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Herring JA, Kim HT, Browne R. Legg‒Calve‒Perthes disease. Part II: prospective multicenter study of the effect of treatment on outcome. JBJS. (2004) 86(10):2121–34. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Domb BG, Stake CE, Lindner D, El-Bitar Y, Jackson TJ. Arthroscopic capsular plication and labral preservation in borderline hip dysplasia: two-year clinical outcomes of a surgical approach to a challenging problem. Am J Sports Med. (2013) 41(11):2591–8. doi: 10.1177/0363546513499154

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Herring JA, Kim HT, Browne R. Legg‒Calve‒Perthes disease. Part I: classification of radiographs with use of the modified lateral pillar and Stulberg classifications. JBJS. (2004) 86(10):2103–20. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Herring JA, Neustadt JB, Williams JJ, Early JS, Browne RH. The lateral pillar classification of Legg‒Calvé‒Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop. (1992) 12(2):143–50. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199203000-00001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Li B, Huang Q, Lin C, Lu R, Wang T, Chen X, et al. Increased circulating CD31+/CD42b-EMPs in Perthes disease and inhibit HUVECs angiogenesis via endothelial dysfunction. Life Sci. (2021) 265:118749. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118749

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gumin Tayeng A, Sengupta A, Chaterjee P. Clinical outcomes of open-wedge varus derotation osteotomy in Legg‒Calve‒Perthes disease among 6-12-year-old children. Cureus. (2023) 15(6):e41144. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41144

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Alam QS, Alam MT, Sutrodhar PK, Islam MS, Hossain MM, Salam SI, et al. Outcomes of varus derotation femoral osteotomy by angle blade plate in Legg‒Calve‒Perthes disease for patient above eight years of age in the lateral pillar B or B/C group. Mymensingh Med J. (2023) 32(3):677–80.37391959

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Adulkasem N, Phinyo P, Tangadulrat P, Wongcharoenwatana J, Ariyawatkul T, Chotigavanichaya C, et al. Comparative effectiveness of treatment modalities in severe Legg‒Calvé‒Perthes disease: systematic review and network meta-analysis of observational studies. Int Orthop. (2022) 46(5):1085–94. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05352-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kim HK. Pathophysiology and new strategies for the treatment of Legg‒Calvé‒Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2012) 94(7):659–69. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01834

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Prasadh JG, Jo CH, Kim HKW. Patient adherence to wide abduction brace treatment for Legg‒Calvé‒Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop. (2023) 43(7):440–6. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002419

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Mas Martinez J, Sanz-Reig J, Verdu Roman C, Martinez Gimenez E, Morales Santias M, Bustamante Suarez de Puga D. Arthroscopic management with labral preservation, femoral osteoplasty, and capsular plication in patients with borderline hip dysplasia. Results of a matched-cohort study at minimum two year follow-up. Int Orthop. (2020) 44(12):2567–75. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04810-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. LaFond E, Breur GJ, Austin CC. Breed susceptibility for developmental orthopedic diseases in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2002) 38(5):467–77. doi: 10.5326/0380467

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Shen Z, Hu J, Wu H, Chen Z, Wu W, Lin J, et al. Global research trends and foci of artificial intelligence-based tumor pathology: a scientometric study. J Transl Med. (2022) 20(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03615-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar