Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pediatr., 17 December 2025

Sec. Pediatric Endocrinology

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1634605

Prevalence of growth retardation among children and adolescents in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis


Wei Wang,,&#x;Wei Wang1,2,†Zhanpeng Qiu,,&#x;Zhanpeng Qiu1,2,†Fang WangFang Wang3Dongsheng Qiu,Dongsheng Qiu1,4Guoping Ye,

Guoping Ye1,4*
  • 1Xiamen TCM Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian, Xiamen, China
  • 2Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian, Fuzhou, China
  • 3Waigang Town Community Health Service Center, Jiading District, Shanghai, China
  • 4Xiamen Hospital, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Fujian, Xiamen, China

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of growth delay in Chinese children and adolescents through a meta-analysis, providing scientific evidence for early intervention and prevention.

Methods: Relevant studies on the prevalence of growth delay in Chinese children were retrieved from eight major databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Chongqing VIP, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the studies based on the inclusion criteria for cross-sectional studies outlined in the STROBE guidelines. Any discrepancies were resolved through cross-checking. Data extracted from studies were analyzed using Stata 15.

Results: A total of 50 studies were included, with a sample size of 2,644,818 participants. The meta-analysis revealed that the overall prevalence of growth delay in Chinese children and adolescents was 5.7% (95% CI: 5.3%–6.2%). Subgroup analysis by age demonstrated the following prevalence rates: 7.4% (95% CI: 6.6%–8.3%) for ages 0–2 years, 6.8% (95% CI: 6.1%–7.4%) for ages 3–6 years, 3.9% (95% CI: 3.6%–4.2%) for ages 6–12 years, and 3.0% (95% CI: 2.3%–3.6%) for ages 13–18 years. Statistically significant differences were observed between age groups (P < 0.05). With regard to gender, the prevalence was 6.2% (95% CI: 5.4%–7.0%) for males and 6.6% (95% CI: 5.7%–7.5%) for females, with no significant difference between genders (P > 0.05). Analysis by residential area indicated that the prevalence in rural areas was 8.4% (95% CI: 6.2%–10.5%), compared to 3.5% (95% CI: 2.5%–4.4%) in urban areas, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Geographically, the Southwest region had the highest prevalence at 9.2% (95% CI: 4.4%–14%), followed by South China (7.0%, 95% CI: 5.7%–8.3%), Northwest China (5.7%, 95% CI: 2.5%–9.0%), Central China (3.8%, 95% CI: 1.4%–6.1%), East China (2.6%, 95% CI: 2.0%–3.2%), and North China (1.8%, 95% CI: 1.1%–2.4%). No significant differences were found in growth delay prevalence among regions (P > 0.05). In terms of study year, the prevalence was 25.8% (95% CI: 2.2%–49.5%) in 2005–2009, 5.2% (95% CI: 3.9%–6.6%) in 2010–2019, and 3.0% (95% CI: 2.7%–3.3%) in 2020–2024, with statistically significant differences observed across years (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The prevalence of growth delay in Chinese children and adolescents is gradually decreasing, with variations across age groups and residential environments. Efforts to alleviate this issue should include enhanced public health awareness, promotion of healthy lifestyles, improved family nutrition education and training, and strengthening of the healthcare system.

Systematic Review Registration: CRD42024579022.

1 Introduction

The physical development of children is not only an important indicator of their nutritional and health status but also serves as a key marker for the socioeconomic development of a country or region (1, 2). With ongoing socioeconomic development, the nutritional status of children has significantly improved. However, the issue of growth retardation among children in developing countries remains a public health concern that warrants attention (3). According to a 2020 survey by the World Health Organization (WHO) (4), 149 million children globally are affected by growth delays, with a prevalence rate of 22%. The 2020 survey on the nutritional status of Chinese residents (5) revealed that the prevalence of growth retardation was 4.8% among children under 6 years of age and 2.2% among those aged 6–17 years. In rural areas, the prevalence of growth retardation among children and adolescents is approximately 2–3 times higher than that in urban areas. The causes of growth retardation in children are complex and diverse, often closely related to genetics, endocrine factors, and insufficient nutritional intake (6). Growth retardation directly impacts the physical and mental health of children and adolescents, increasing the risk of chronic diseases such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes in adulthood. It also has long-term negative effects on cognitive and socioemotional development and may even lead to depression. In severe cases, it may lead to developmental disorders affecting various organs and tissues, as well as deficiencies in immune and neurological function (7, 8). With recent advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies, together with ongoing economic development, the incidence of growth retardation in Chinese children has demonstrated a downward trend. Furthermore, at the international level, childhood nutritional intervention is considered one of the most valuable investments in human capital (9). In China, national-level censuses are conducted intermittently, while localized and regional studies are conducted annually. These studies ensure that incidence data remain temporally relevant, underscoring the importance of regularly incorporating new evidence to update the prevalence of growth retardation among Chinese children. Such efforts enable a timely and comprehensive understanding of the overall status, trends, and influencing factors related to physical development in this population. Accordingly, this study employs a meta-analytic approach to update the current epidemiological profile of growth retardation in Chinese children and investigate its potential influencing factors in depth, thereby providing an evidence base for the development of more targeted intervention strategies.

2 Materials and methods

This report adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (10), and the study protocol was registered and published on PROSPERO [CRD42024579022].

2.1 Literature search

A literature search was conducted on the prevalence of growth retardation and stunting in Chinese children in both Chinese and English databases. The Chinese databases included China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Chongqing VIP, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc). The English databases included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search covered the period from the inception of each database to 20 September 2024, without language restrictions but limited to studies conducted in China. In addition, references from systematic reviews and gray literature were also screened to avoid missing relevant studies. The following Chinese search terms were included: “儿童,” “青少年,” “生长迟缓,” “矮小,” “患病率,” “流行率,” “流行病学调查.” For the English search, both subject terms and free terms were used, including “Adolescent,” “Child,” “Growth Disorders,” “Stunting,” “epidemiology,” “Prevalence,” “China,” and “Chinese.” The search strategies were adjusted according to the characteristics of each database, and cross-database searches were conducted to ensure comprehensiveness. For example, the search strategy for PubMed is presented in Table 1, additional search strategies available in Supplementary 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. PubMed search strategies for growth retardation prevalence in Chinese children and adolescents.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies conducted in China with participants aged ≤18 years; (2) observational or cross-sectional studies with clear sample size and reported prevalence or number of cases; (3) clearly defined diagnostic criteria and methods; and (4) sample size ≥5,000 participants.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies with incomplete data or duplicated publications; (2) studies with inadequate design or statistical errors; and (3) reviews, conference abstracts, and similar publications.

2.3 Literature screening and data extraction

The identified studies were first input into EndNote 20 software for automatic screening and removal of duplicates. Two independent researchers (WW and FW) then screened the deduplicated articles. The titles and abstracts of the articles were initially reviewed, followed by downloading and full-text review of the studies that met the inclusion criteria after initial screening. During this process, all excluded articles were recorded, with rational explanations provided for exclusion. Any disagreements during this process were resolved through discussion or adjudicated by a third senior researcher. The final screening results were cross-checked by two researchers.

The following information or data were extracted from the included studies: (1) study characteristics: first author, publication year, geographical location (province), region (urban/rural), sample size, and diagnostic criteria; (2) participant characteristics: age, gender, and origin; and (3) outcome measures: prevalence (by gender, region, and age). If any information required for extraction was missing or not clearly reported in the studies included in the systematic review, the researchers attempted to contact the authors to obtain the data or directly retrieved the original studies for supplementation. Any disagreements that arose during the process of data extraction were resolved through discussion or adjudicated by a third senior researcher.

2.4 Literature quality assessment

The quality of the included studies was assessed using the STROBE checklist (11) for cross-sectional studies, which consists of 22 items covering the Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. Each item that met the criteria was assigned 1 point, and those that did not were assigned 0 points, with a total score of 22 points. A score of ≤5 was considered low quality, a score of 6–11 was considered moderate quality, and a score >11 was considered high quality.

3 Results

3.1 Basic characteristics of included studies

A total of 3,139 articles were initially retrieved. After screening the titles and abstracts and conducting a full-text review, 50 studies (1261) were included in the final analysis. Of these, 45 were in Chinese (1214, 1622, 2440, 4248, 5053, 5561) and five were in English (15, 23, 41, 49, 54). The literature screening process and results are shown in Figure 1. The studies covered data from 31 provinces and four direct-controlled municipalities across China. The total sample size across all studies was 2,644,818 participants, among whom 77,586 cases of growth retardation were identified.

Figure 1
Flowchart outlining the process of identifying studies via databases and registers. Initially, 3139 articles were identified, with duplicates (1985) removed, leaving 1154 for title and abstract screening. After exclusions for irrelevance (628), mismatched study types (315), non-Chinese studies (8), and substandard sample sizes (118), 85 documents were read fully. Further exclusions for incomplete text (8), data duplication (3), and intervention incompatibility (24) resulted in 50 studies included in the final literature.

Figure 1. Flowchart of identification and screening for studies on growth retardation prevalence in Chinese children and adolescents.

3.2 Quality assessment of included studies

Two studies (24, 26) scored 5 points and were classified as low quality. Thirty-nine studies (1222, 25, 2731, 3336, 3840, 42, 4448, 50, 52, 53, 5558, 60, 61) scored between 6 and 11 points and were classified as moderate quality. Nine studies (23, 32, 37, 41, 43, 49, 51, 54, 59) scored above 11 points, with the highest score being 15. The average score across the studies was 8.4 points (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. General information and quality scores of the included studies.

3.3 Meta-analysis

3.3.1 Prevalence of growth retardation

A total of 50 studies were included in this analysis, all of which reported the prevalence of growth retardation. The total sample size across the studies was 2,644,818 children and adolescents aged 0–18 years, with 77,586 cases of growth retardation identified. Heterogeneity testing across the 50 studies revealed an I2 of 99.9% (P < 0.05), indicating high heterogeneity. A random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis, which showed that the overall prevalence of growth retardation among children and adolescents was 6.0% (95% CI: 5.0%–6.0%) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Forest plot displaying effect sizes and confidence intervals for various studies. Dots represent effect estimates with horizontal lines showing 95% confidence intervals. The summary effect is indicated at the bottom, showing high heterogeneity (I² = 99.9%). A vertical reference line is at zero, with effect sizes mostly positive, emphasizing the summary effect and individual study impacts.

Figure 2. Forest plot of meta-analysis of the total prevalence of growth retardation in Chinese.

3.3.2 Subgroup analysis

Owing to considerable heterogeneity among studies, subgroup analysis was performed based on gender, age, residential environment (urban/rural), region, and year of publication. After testing, it was found that heterogeneity remained significant; therefore, a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis (Tables 3, 4).

1. A total of 35 studies involving children and adolescents of different ages were included in the analysis of growth retardation. The highest prevalence was observed in infants aged 1 year, at 8.9% (95% CI: 7.3%–10.5%), while the lowest prevalence was found in adolescents aged 15 and 16 years, at 1.9% (95% CI: 1.0%–2.9%) and 1.9% (95% CI: 1.1%–2.7%), respectively. The differences in growth retardation prevalence across different age groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) (Table 3).


Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Subgroup analysis of growth retardation prevalence: results by age.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Subgroup analysis of growth retardation prevalence: results by age group.

Subgroup analysis based on the age groups 0–2, 3–6, 7–12, and 13–18 years showed that the prevalence of growth retardation differed significantly across these age groups (P < 0.05) (Table 4).

2. A total of 38 studies on growth retardation in adolescents of different genders were included. The prevalence was 6.2% (95% CI: 5.4%–7.0%) in boys and 6.6% (95% CI: 5.7%–7.5%) in girls. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of growth retardation between genders (P > 0.05) (Table 5).

3. A total of 18 studies on growth retardation in adolescents from different residential environments were included. The prevalence was higher in rural adolescents, at 8.4% (95% CI: 6.2%–10.5%), compared to 3.5% (95% CI: 2.5%–4.4%) in urban adolescents. The difference in prevalence between rural and urban environments was statistically significant (P < 0.01) (Table 5).

4. A total of 46 studies on growth retardation in adolescents from different regions were included. The highest prevalence was observed in the Southwest region, at 9.2% (95% CI: 4.4%–14%), followed by South China at 7.0% (95% CI: 5.7%–8.3%), the Northwest region at 5.7% (95% CI: 2.5%–9.0%), Central China at 3.8% (95% CI: 1.4%–6.1%), East China at 2.6% (95% CI: 2.0%–3.2%), and North China at 1.8% (95% CI: 1.1%–2.4%). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of growth retardation between regions (P > 0.05) (Table 5).

5. Subgroup analysis by year of survey showed that the prevalence of growth retardation in children and adolescents was 25.8% (95% CI: 2.2%–49.5%) during 2005–2009, 5.2% (95% CI: 3.9%–6.6%) during 2010–2019, and 3% (95% CI: 2.7%–3.3%) during 2020–2024. The differences in the prevalence across different publication years were statistically significant (P < 0.01) (Table 5).

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Subgroup analysis of growth retardation prevalence in Chinese children and adolescents.

3.4 Sensitivity analysis

The sensitivity analysis indicated that five studies had a significant impact on the pooled results. These five studies were considered the source of heterogeneity in the prevalence of growth retardation in children and adolescents (Supplementary 2).

3.5 Publication bias

Funnel plots and Egger's test revealed the presence of publication bias in the studies on the prevalence of growth retardation in children and adolescents (P < 0.001). The Egger’s test yielded a result of t = 6.14, P = 0.017. In addition, the asymmetry of the funnel plot suggested the existence of publication bias in this body of research on the prevalence of growth retardation in children and adolescents (Supplementary 2 and Figure 3).

Figure 3
Funnel plot displaying effect sizes (ES) on the x-axis and standard error (Se_ES) on the y-axis. Points are scattered asymmetrically around x equals zero with pseudo 95% confidence limits shown as dashed lines.

Figure 3. Funnel plot of the enrolled studies.

4 Discussion

This study aggregated 50 published research articles on childhood stunting from 2005 to 2024, covering 31 provinces and four municipalities across China, with a total sample size of 2,644,818 children and adolescents. The average AHRQ score of the included studies was 8.4, indicating medium to high quality. The meta-analysis results show that the overall prevalence of growth retardation in Chinese children and adolescents is 5.7% (95% CI: 5.3%–6.2%), which is significantly lower than the prevalence rates in underdeveloped regions like Africa [e.g., Ethiopia 36.6% (62), Rwanda 33% (63)] and Oceania (27%) (3). Previous studies (64, 65) have indicated that countries with higher rates of stunting are typically located near the equator or in the Southern Hemisphere, such as parts of Africa, the Indian subcontinent, and areas between North and South America. In contrast, socioeconomically developed regions like Europe and the U.S. have relatively lower rates of growth retardation (66, 67), largely due to high education levels, well-developed prenatal care, and adequate nutrition, which prevent adverse events during pregnancy and reduce the birth rate of stunted children (68, 69).

In this study, children and adolescents were grouped into age categories (0–2, 3–6, 7–12, 12–18) for subgroup analysis. The prevalence of growth retardation showed a fluctuating trend with age. The lowest rate was found in the 13–18 age group at 3.0%, while the highest was in the 0–2 age group at 7.4%. This could be attributed to the incomplete development of the gastrointestinal function in infants and young children (70), making them more prone to picky eating, indigestion, and bacterial or viral infections (67). Moreover, improper feeding by parents or a lack of awareness regarding height issues in this age group may have contributed to a higher prevalence of stunting. Moreover, maternal health conditions such as malnutrition, diseases during pregnancy, and prematurity are significant factors contributing to growth retardation (7173).

Subgroup analysis also revealed that the prevalence of stunting in Chinese girls was 6.6%, slightly higher than in boys (6.2%), though the difference was not statistically significant. A study in Iran (74) also suggested no significant difference in stunting rates between boys and girls, and some Asian studies (75) found no significant gender difference either. However, some Chinese studies (18, 21) reported a higher prevalence of stunting in girls, which might be related to the increase in estrogen levels during puberty. Estrogen accelerates bone maturation, which may cause premature closure of growth plates and affect growth speed. In addition, cultural factors, such as the preference for boys over girls in some areas, may contribute to this difference by increasing attention to boys' health.

We also found that the prevalence of growth retardation was significantly higher in rural children (8.4%) compared to urban children (3.5%). This disparity may be explained by advantages in environment, resources, education, and socioeconomic conditions in urban areas (76). Families in some rural areas may face economic constraints, leading to insufficient food supply and difficulty in providing adequate high-quality proteins, vitamins, and minerals to meet children's growth needs, thereby affecting their development. In particular, children in poor regions are more likely to experience malnutrition or micronutrient deficiencies. Furthermore, rural areas often have limited healthcare access, and parents may not pay enough attention to children's health issues, causing delayed diagnosis and treatment for growth-related problems.

The study also demonstrated a significant decline in the prevalence of growth retardation over time in China, decreasing from 25.8% in 2005–2009 to 5.8% in 2010–2019, and further to 3.0% in 2020–2024. This trend is likely attributable to rapid economic development, improvements in nutrition and healthcare, public health policies, and better family education. Collectively, these factors have contributed to better living standards, increased attention to children's nutrition, and a deeper understanding of the adverse effects of growth retardation, thereby improving the overall situation.

In addition, the prevalence of stunting was highest in the Southwest region (9.2%) compared to other regions, with the order of prevalence being Southwest China (9.2%), South China (7.0%), Northwest China (5.7%), Central China (3.8%), West China (2.6%), and North China (1.8%). However, the differences were not statistically significant, likely due to variations in sample sizes and the number of included studies. China's vast geography, diverse ethnicities, economic disparities, environmental conditions, education levels, and cultural practices contribute to regional differences in stunting, necessitating further research.

5 Significance and limitations

This study provides significant insights by aggregating data from 31 provinces and four municipalities across China, revealing the trends in the prevalence of growth retardation. It fills the gap of recent data on stunting rates among Chinese children. Despite being a large-sample cross-sectional study, there are some limitations: (1) There was considerable heterogeneity among studies included in this analysis. Although subgroup analysis was performed, the heterogeneity did not decrease significantly. Publication bias was detected through Egger's test and funnel plots, which may affect the accuracy of the meta-analysis results. (2) In terms of diagnostic variability, growth retardation diagnoses in the included studies often relied on measurement indicators, with no uniform laboratory diagnostic standards, which may have contributed to the heterogeneity. (3) With regard to regional representation, no research was available from Northeast China, which limits the representativeness of the analysis. In addition, the impact of ethnic factors on the prevalence of growth retardation was not considered, which may have influenced the results.

6 Conclusion

In conclusion, the overall prevalence of growth retardation among Chinese children and adolescents was 5.7%, with significant differences observed across age groups, living environments, and study years. This phenomenon may be attributed to factors such as economic development, education levels, nutrition status, and healthcare conditions. Public health initiatives to promote healthy lifestyles, strengthen family nutrition education, and improve healthcare systems are therefore crucial. This study provides new guidance and data for understanding childhood stunting, offering a reference for policymaking and implementation.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

WW: Writing – original draft. ZQ: Writing – original draft. FW: Writing – review & editing. DQ: Writing – review & editing. GY: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2025J011449), the Jinglu Talent Program for Traditional Chinese Medicine of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Dongzhimen Hospital Xiamen Hospital (No. Xia Zhong Yi [2024] 160), and the Xiamen Natural Science Foundation Joint Program (No. 3502Z20227362).

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to all participants whose collaboration made this study possible.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1634605/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary 1 | S1 File: Search Query.

Supplementary 2 | S2 File: Research Indicators and Their Subgroup Plots.

References

1. Tanner JM. Growth as a measure of the nutritional and hygienic status of a population. Horm Res. (1992) 38(Suppl 1):106–15. doi: 10.1159/000182580

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Perkins JM, Subramanian SV, Davey Smith G, Özaltin E. Adult height, nutrition, and population health. Nutr Rev. (2016) 74(3):149–65. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ssentongo P, Ssentongo AE, Ba DM, Ericson JE, Na M, Gao X, et al. Global, regional and national epidemiology and prevalence of child stunting, wasting, and underweight in low- and middle-income countries, 2006–2018. Sci Rep. (2021) 11(1):5204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84302-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Li JJH, Sun Y, Shen LP, Yan YX, Yang ZY. Comparison of nutritional status of children under 5 years of age in China based on WHO and Chinese standards. Chin J Maternal Child Health Care. (2021) 36(1):130–5. doi: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.01.044

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. China nutrition and chronic disease Status report (2020). Chin J Nutr. (2020) 42(6):521. Available online at: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/CiBQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJU29scjkyMDI1MTExNzE2MDExNxIQeWluZ3l4YjIwMjAwNjAwMRoIMWE3a3BmM2Q%3D

Google Scholar

6. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. (2017) 390(10113):2627–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Gabain IL, Ramsteijn AS, Webster JP. Parasites and childhood stunting—a mechanistic interplay with nutrition, anaemia, gut health, microbiota, and epigenetics. Trends Parasitol. (2023) 39(3):167–80. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2022.12.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. De Onis M, Branca F. Childhood stunting: a global perspective. Matern Child Nutr. (2016) 12(Suppl 1):12–26. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12231

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Li T. The dual burden of malnutrition and overweight/obesity among Chinese children. Chin J Pract Pediatr. (2015) 30(12):881–3. doi: 10.7504/ek2015120601

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA. (2015) 313(16):1657–65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3656

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. (2007) 370(9596):1453–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chen FC. Nutritional status monitoring of children aged 0–7 in Jinjiang City. Modern Prev Med. (2005) 32(9):1152–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8507.2005.09.065

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Dang SN, Yan H, Zeng LX, Wang QL, Li Q, Xie H, et al. Assessment of the nutritional status of children under 3 years of age in rural counties of western China using anthropometric methods. Chin J Epidemiol. (2005) 26(3):29–33. doi: 10.3760/j.issn:0254-6450.2005.03.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Cheng RQ, Shen SX, Tu YZ, Xia H, Wang H, Zhi DJ, et al. Distribution characteristics of height and prevalence of stunting in children and adolescents aged 6–18 in two suburban districts of Shanghai: a cluster sampling survey. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr. (2009) 4(1):5–11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2009.01.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Wang X, Höjer B, Guo S, Luo S, Zhou W, Wang Y. Stunting and ‘overweight’ in the WHO Child Growth Standards—malnutrition among children in a poor area of China. Public Health Nutr. (2009) 12(11):1991–8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009990796

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Zhang QY. Health status of children under 5 years of age in Meizhou city. Chin Med Herald. (2011) 8(22):141–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2011.22.065

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Liu JT, Jiang YJ, Xu YZ, Zhang J, Wu FY. Analysis of the nutritional status of children under 5 years old in Sichuan Province. Chin J Child Health Care. (2013) 21(11):1126–8. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=7DUETwKSFy6qULBZrrrTww3LsI3Y8Ajn0uZ80mee56L1PeBsV-y5gWEPpiSLJh-J8EAtxR68OL6QPPLpYgOBg26GLphWW88zxFEgyHMfPuOldmgfhHm5WxGAbCVecrofmh6PolAVrm4CXya220GVZW4tiCi0MAMlSSWi4mShXRbhtwMa1doKPg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

18. Wang QX, Xu CQ, Fu CR, Liu WR, Wang JH. Growth and development status of children under 7 years old in Ningbo City. Zhejiang Prev Med. (2013) 25(4):4–7; +26. doi: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2013.04.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Xiang J, Liu WJ, Luo Y, Wang WL, Li YM, Lin X, et al. Investigation on the height standards and prevalence of stunting among primary and middle school students in Wanzhou district, Chongqing. J Third Military Med Univ. (2014) 36(21):2221–4. doi: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.2014.21.015

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Li SL, Li X, Yin MP, Shi CL, Du FF, Zhang WT, et al. Investigation on the height distribution characteristics of children aged 7–13 in Yan'an City. Modern Prev Med. (2015) 42(21):3904–6; +88. Available online at: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/CiBQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJU29scjkyMDI1MTExNzE2MDExNxIPeGR5Znl4MjAxNTIxMDIxGghhcnE0MWt0Nw%3D%3D

Google Scholar

21. Chen JY, Li LH, Huang WJ, Fang L, Wen ST. Analysis of the results of physical examinations of children in kindergartens in Houjie Town, Dongguan city in 2014. Chin Primary Health Care. (2016) 30(5):33–4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-568X.2016.05.0014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Jing XM, Zhang LM, Pan CC. Analysis of health check-up status and countermeasures for children in daycare institutions. Chin J Child Health Care. (2016) 24(1):96–8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4954.2018.07.276

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Wu H, Li H, Zong X. The prevalence of overweight, obesity and stunting in school children aged 6–19 years in Beijing, China. Ann Hum Biol. (2016) 43(6):505–9. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2015.1107129

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chen XJ, Yang LQ, Liu DY, Wang Q, Liu Y. Prevalence of stunting among children in three cities of Anhui Province. Chin J Child Health Care. (2017) 25(4):401–5. doi: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-04-23

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Liu SS, Ban B, Pan H, Zhang M, Sun HL, Li P, et al. Prevalence of stunting among children and adolescents aged 6–16 in Jining area. Chin Diagn Electron J. (2017) 5(3):188–91. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-655X.2017.03.012

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Qin Y, Yang LH. Investigation on the prevalence of stunting and its etiology among children in Wuhan city. Chin J Maternal Child Health Care. (2017) 32(14):3306–10. doi: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2017.14.76

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Tao XG, Zhao GH, Gao YQ, Yao HW, Sheng RJ, Huang LM. Analysis of height distribution and influencing factors of stunting among primary school children in Yizheng city. Jiangsu Med. (2017) 43(10):703–5. doi: 10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2017.10.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Xu JJ. Investigation and analysis of the incidence and causes of stunting in primary school children in Jingdezhen City. Contemp Med. (2017) 23(20):1–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2017.20.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Yu M, He HY, Ning M, Chen C. Health status analysis of children in urban and rural daycare institutions in Wuhu City in 2015. Chin J Maternal Child Health Care. (2017) 8(3):72–3; +9. doi: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2017.03.019

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Fang YH, Zhao LY, Yu DM, Fang HY, Yu WT, Guo QY. Growth retardation and wasting status of Chinese children and adolescents aged 6–17 from 2010 to 2012. Health Res. (2018) 47(1):27–31. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2018.01.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Sang MY, Li S, Yang XJ. Investigation of height distribution and stunting prevalence among 7–18 year-old populations in Datong City. Basic Med Clin. (2018) 38(11):1593–4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6325.2018.11.019

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Wang LF, Gu YQ, Jia LS, Gu T, Gu Y, Lu T. Study on the incidence and influencing factors of stunting in children aged 3–14 years in Taicang City. J Pediatr Pharm. (2018) 24(3):20–4. doi: 10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2018.03.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Shi JQ. Health check-up analysis of children in daycare institutions in Dali County, Shaanxi Province. Chin Health Nutr. (2019) 20:254–5. Available online at: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/CiBQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJU29scjkyMDI1MTExNzE2MDExNxISemdianl5LWtwMjAxOTIwMzU1GghpbmJ2ZHZoNQ%3D%3D

Google Scholar

34. Zhu XX, Zheng JR, Zheng M, Duan GS, Li PB. Analysis of nutritional and health monitoring of children under 5 years old in urban and rural areas of Yunnan province from 2012 to 2018. Chin J Child Health Care. (2019) 27(5):571–3; +80. doi: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0399

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Gou J, Yang YF. Analysis of health check-up results of children in daycare institutions in Longquan District, Chengdu City from 2016 to 2018. J Prev Med Inf. (2020) 36(6):702–6. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=tsj_6yYi9c6JemtfTLmOVwnEASzmBowxNC78WzRafcVYCv4Qwpn_KDOhVIO3oUpfEFrOyFMS5yYWvh4Um5SkYjrbd__MEpglNFkqtKBjQYviyzVWuLz3jjb_k1CajoYfucQVphixLQfHDD33bQOVgBRzLhv-oMla8EOa0EfelUF5GuGn1UGqkg==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

36. Guo W. Survey on the prevalence of stunting and related factors in children aged 7–12 in Baota District (master's thesis). Yan'an City (2020).

Google Scholar

37. Hong D, Fan QH, Gao LP, Qian YF, Yuan Q. Investigation of height distribution and stunting detection rate among primary school children aged 6–12 years in Suzhou city. Chin J Hemorheology. (2020) 30(2):214–17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-881X.2020.02.023

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Lin ZQ, Zhang W, Chen J. Analysis of the health status of children with urban and non-local household registrations in Haicang District, Xiamen city from 2012 to 2018. Chin J Maternal Child Health Care. (2020) 35(24):4736–41. doi: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.24.030

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Xiong XB, Zhang Y, Guo Y, Zeng T, Li HH. Study on height development and prevalence of stunting among primary school children aged 6–12 years in Rong'an County, Guangxi. Guangxi Med. (2020) 42(13):1695–7. doi: 10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2020.13.18

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Zhang SX. Survey on the growth and development of preschool children in southern Tianjin and its influencing factors, Tianjin (master's thesis). (2020).

Google Scholar

41. Zhang YQ, Wu HH, Zong XN, Li H. Survey on the stunting of children under seven years of age in nine cities of China. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2020) 58(3):194–200. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2020.03.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Huang SJ. Survey on the prevalence and influencing factors of stunting in children in Pingshan District, Shenzhen City, Shenzhen (master's thesis). (2021).

Google Scholar

43. Luo M, Zhao ZL, He LK, Zhou TJ, Liu WX. Analysis of the nutritional status of children under 5 years old in Sichuan Province in 2019. Mod Prev Med. (2021) 48(1):44–6; +66. Available online at: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/CiBQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJU29scjkyMDI1MTExNzE2MDExNxIPeGR5Znl4MjAyMTAxMDEwGghvMmJwcGppaA%3D%3D

Google Scholar

44. Wang Y, Wang XR, Jing W, Zhang H, Xiang Y. Analysis of the health care and health status of children under 7 years old in the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps from 2014 to 2019. Chin J Child Health Care. (2021) 29(12):1376–9. doi: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-2216

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Yin HJ, Chen XQ, Li LP. Analysis of the health status and strategies for collective children in daycare institutions in the southwestern street of Sanshui district, foshan city. Front Med. (2021) 11(5):169–70. Available online at: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/CiBQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJU29scjkyMDI1MTExNzE2MDExNxIOeWl5cXkyMDIxMDUwODMaCDdnNnhsOXky

Google Scholar

46. Zhao Q. Analysis of the physical examination results of children aged 0–3 years in a community in Jiading from 2018 to 2020. Chin Contemp Med. (2021) 28(19):191–3; +7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2021.19.054

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Zheng R, Liang F, Bai J, Pan L, Bai QL, Li ZL. Analysis of nutritional diseases among children under 5 years old in Lanzhou from 2000 to 2018. Chin J Child Health Care. (2021) 29(2):198–201. doi: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-0465

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Zhu L, Hu XM, Yan MQ, Bai LX, Yang JP, Duan F, et al. Survey on malnutrition in children under 5 years old in different areas of Shanxi Province. Chin Pharm Clin. (2021) 21(19):3259–62. doi: 10.11655/zgywylc2021.19.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Liu J, Sun J, Huang J, Huo JS. Prevalence of malnutrition and associated factors of stunting among 6–23-month-old infants in central rural China in 2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18(15):8165. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Liu F, Wei HY, Su AF, Yao ZY, Ding L, Chen YX, et al. Prevalence and influencing factors of stunting among children aged 3–18 years in Henan Province. Anhui Med. (2022) 26(2):265–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2022.02.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wang WH. Research on the nutritional status and influencing factors of children aged 0-5 in Hainan Province, Hainan (master's thesis). (2022).

Google Scholar

52. Yu Y, Chen M, Zhu ZS, Xu SH, Geng GH, Cheng LX. Screening of stunting prevalence and analysis of psychological and behavioral problems in children in the coastal area of Weifang, Shandong. Weifang Med Univ J. (2022) 44(1):75–7. doi: 10.16846/j.issn.1004-3101.2022.01.023

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Zhang YG. Analysis of the nutritional status of children under 5 years old in Wujiang District, Suzhou City from 2018 to 2021. Jiangsu Prev Med. (2022) 33(6):739–41. doi: 10.13668/j.issn.1006-9070.2022.06.038

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Li H, Yuan S, Fang H, Huang G, Huang Q, Wang H, et al. Prevalence and associated factors for stunting, underweight and wasting among children under 6 years of age in rural Hunan Province, China: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2022) 22:483. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12875-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Pan SX, Wang WH. Analysis of the physical examination results of 18,139 children aged 3–6 in Qujiang District, Shaoguan City from 2020 to 2022. Chin Community Physician. (2023) 39(28):155–7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2023.28.053

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Pan SX, Wang WH. Study on the growth and development of children aged 0–3 years in Shaoguan City from 2018 to 2022. Chin Contemp Med. (2023) 30(9):128–130+139. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=tsj_6yYi9c5YA1VnSu39TpydEryCZ5490RO8lCypAX6cpmyenhu2JNj3X0TKOPct8xQgW6KCokLqVk3rRzz0iHB3k4k-aIDGDyYWvEVnN6MT0kVocn2sVnR_RgUoYV0RgiiAHjusA-ksBi3e5-okMhGSrKrB9Rn8c-JF2sfQWQq8lS-0Cir2ig==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

57. Shi J, Deng KG, Liu YX, Hou XF, Sun Z, Liu MY. Height and prevalence of stunting among children aged 6–12 years in Dongying City. J Changchun Univ TCM. (2023) 39(3):331–5. doi: 10.13463/j.cnki.cczyy.2023.03.023

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Wu J, Wang J, Yang DY, Zhang XY, Peng L. Analysis of physical examination results of children in 12 kindergartens in Xuzhou City from 2018 to 2020. Chin School Med. (2023) 37(1):52–4. doi: 10.20161/j.cnki.32-1199/r.2023.01.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Zhang L, Ma WW, Wang J, Zhang Q. Investigation of height characteristics and stunting prevalence among children aged 3–12 years in Hanzhong City. Hainan Med. (2023) 34(3):404–8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2023.03.026

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Zhang XH. Survey on the nutritional status of children of different age groups in Panyu District, Guangzhou, and countermeasures. Grassroots Med Forum. (2023) 27(20):124–6. doi: 10.19435/j.1672-1721.2023.20.041

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Zhu HY, Xiang ML, Ma CX. Analysis of the health examination results of preschool children in Erqi District, Zhengzhou City from 2019 to 2021. J Henan Med Coll. (2023) 35(5):539–42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9276.2023.05.016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Kuse KA, Debeko DD. Spatial distribution and determinants of stunting, wasting, and underweight in children under five in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15488-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Kalinda C, Phri M, Qambayot MA, Ishimwe MCS, Gebremariam A, Bekele A, et al. Socio-demographic and environmental determinants of under-5 stunting in Rwanda: evidence from a multisectoral study. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1107300. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1107300

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Zhang M, Yan WJ. Global distribution and associated factors of stunting in children under 5 years of age. Mod Prev Med. (2023) 50(18):3337–40; +46. doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202306163

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Neufeld LM, Beal T, Larson LM, Cattaneo FD. Global landscape of malnutrition in infants and young children. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. (2020) 93:1–14. doi: 10.1159/000503315

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Escher NA, Andrade GC, Ghosh-Jerath S, Millett C, Seferidi P. The effect of nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions on the double burden of malnutrition in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. (2024) 12(3):e419–32. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00562-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Bagamian KH, Anderson JD IV, Blohm G, Scheele S. Shigella and childhood stunting: evidence, gaps, and future research directions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2023) 17(9):e0011475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011475

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Li Z, Kim R, Vollmer S, Subramanian SV. Factors associated with child stunting, wasting, and underweight in 35 low- and middle-income countries. JAMA Netw Open. (2020) 3(4):e203386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3386

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Vaivada T, Akseer N, Akseer S, Somaskandan A, Stefopulos M, Bhutta ZA. Stunting in childhood: an overview of global burden, trends, determinants, and drivers of decline. Am J Clin Nutr. (2020) 112(Suppl 2):777s–91. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa159

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Budge S, Parker AH, Hutchings PT, Garbutt C. Environmental enteric dysfunction and child stunting. Nutr Rev. (2019) 77(4):240–53. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy068

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Ayano G, Demelash S, Gizachew Y, Tsegay L, Alati R. The global prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. J Affect Disord. (2023) 339:860–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.071

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Sari K, Sartika RAD. The effect of the physical factors of parents and children on stunting at birth among newborns in Indonesia. J Prev Med Public Health. (2021) 54(5):309–16. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.21.120

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Nadhiroh SR, Micheala F, Tung SEH, Kustiawan TC. Association between maternal anemia and stunting in infants and children aged 0–60 months: a systematic literature review. Nutrition. (2023) 115:112094. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112094

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Mansori K, Khosravi Shadmani F, Mirzaei H, Vesal Azad R, Khateri S, Mansouri Hanis S, et al. Prevalence of stunting in Iranian children under five years of age: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. (2018) 32:103. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Boylan S, Mihrshahi S, Louie JCY, Rangan A, Salleh HN, Md Ali HI, et al. Prevalence and risk of moderate stunting among a sample of children aged 0–24 months in Brunei. Matern Child Health J. (2017) 21(12):2256–66. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2348-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Sarma H, Khan JR, Asaduzzaman M, Uddin F, Tarannum S, Hasan MM, et al. Factors influencing the prevalence of stunting among children aged below five years in Bangladesh. Food Nutr Bull. (2017) 38(3):291–301. doi: 10.1177/0379572117710103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: growth delay, stunting, children, adolescents, prevalence, meta-analysis

Citation: Wang W, Qiu Z, Wang F, Qiu D and Ye G (2025) Prevalence of growth retardation among children and adolescents in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pediatr. 13:1634605. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1634605

Received: 24 May 2025; Revised: 20 November 2025;
Accepted: 24 November 2025;
Published: 17 December 2025.

Edited by:

Silvano Bertelloni, University of Pisa, Italy

Reviewed by:

Rodolfo A. Rey, Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez, Argentina
Arzu Uzuner, MARSEV MArmara Health Education and Research Center, Türkiye

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Qiu, Wang, Qiu and Ye. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guoping Ye, MTY2MTQzNzQ3MkBxcS5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.