Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Pediatr., 12 January 2026

Sec. General Pediatrics and Pediatric Emergency Care

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1636941

This article is part of the Research TopicCase Reports in Pediatric Oncology: 2025View all 12 articles

Case Report: Vincristine-induced acute pancreatitis in pediatric Wilms tumor: first reported case challenging previous risk classifications and proposing vigilant monitoring protocols


Ting LiuTing Liu1Zhongqiang CaoZhongqiang Cao1Fangyuan LaiFangyuan Lai1Huanli XuHuanli Xu2Zebin ChenZebin Chen1Xiuli Yuan
Xiuli Yuan2*Xiaoya Liu

Xiaoya Liu1*
  • 1Department of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China
  • 2Department of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China

Vincristine, a cornerstone vinca alkaloid in pediatric oncology, has historically been regarded as a low-risk agent for drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP). We report the first documented pediatric case of vincristine monotherapy-associated acute pancreatitis, challenging existing toxicity paradigms. A 3.25-year-old boy with stage IV Wilms tumor developed acute-onset fever and localized periumbilical pain 48 h after vincristine infusion (0.9 mg), administered within standard dosing. Laboratory testing confirmed marked pancreatic hyperenzymemia (serum α-amylase 2,022 U/L, 12.5 × ULN; lipase 568 U/L, 7.1 × ULN), and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography revealed pancreatic edema. A Naranjo score of 7 indicated probable causality, further supported by complete symptom resolution after substitution with vindesine and no recurrence during six months of follow-up. Genetic testing showed no CEP72 (rs924607) susceptibility variant, suggesting a hypersensitivity rather than pharmacogenomic mechanism. This case highlights the need to re-evaluate vincristine's DIAP risk profile in children and supports implementing routine post-infusion monitoring of pancreatic enzymes in high-risk patients. Vindesine may serve as a safe and effective alternative agent. These findings underscore the importance of updating pediatric chemotherapy safety guidelines for vinca alkaloid-containing regimens.

Introduction

Vincristine is a widely used vinca alkaloid that acts by disrupting microtubule assembly, thereby inhibiting cell division and tumor growth. Although generally well tolerated, its known toxicities include peripheral neuropathy, myelosuppression, and gastrointestinal disturbances (1). Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory condition characterized by pancreatic autodigestion and carries significant morbidity and mortality (2). While multiple chemotherapeutic agents, such as pegaspargase, cytarabine, and mercaptopurine, have been implicated in AP (35), vincristine-induced AP is exceedingly rare and has not been previously reported in children.

Given the widespread use of vincristine in pediatric oncology, reporting suspected cases of vincristine-associated AP is essential for improving risk recognition, diagnostic accuracy, and patient safety. This report presents the first pediatric case of AP associated with vincristine monotherapy and discusses its potential mechanisms, diagnostic considerations, and clinical implications.

Case presentation

A 3.25-year-old boy presented with a left abdominal mass without abdominal pain, fever, vomiting, or bleeding. Imaging and biopsy confirmed left-sided Wilms tumor with pulmonary metastases. Baseline abdominal Doppler ultrasonography showed normal liver, gallbladder, bile ducts, pancreas, and vasculature.

Preoperative chemotherapy was initiated according to the SIOP–RTSG 2016 protocol (6), consisting of vincristine (1.5 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Weeks 1–6), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Weeks 1 and 5), and dactinomycin (45 µg/kg on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, and 5). The patient tolerated the first week well. Although the vincristine was scheduled for day 8, the child returned one day later than planned due to long-distance travel and therefore received 0.9 mg vincristine intravenously on day 9. He was discharged afterward but returned two days later with fever (39.2℃) and persistent periumbilical abdominal pain without vomiting.

Laboratory tests revealed marked elevation in pancreatic enzymes: serum amylase rising to 2,022 U/L (normal: 25–101 U/L) and urinary amylase to 2,356 U/L (normal: 0–1,200 U/L). Abdominal ultrasonography showed a small amount of peritoneal fluid (Figure 1) without abnormalities in the liver, gallbladder, spleen, or pancreas. No significant changes in bowel habits were noted during the chemotherapy period.

Figure 1
The figure shows two side-by-side Doppler abdominal ultrasound images. In the left image, a small anechoic dark area is visible in the lower abdomen and is marked with a red star. In the right image, no obvious anechoic dark area is visible, and the background echoes appear uniform across the scanned field.

Figure 1. Doppler ultrasonography revealed a small amount of fluid in the lower abdomen with a maximum depth of 1.4 cm (left, red star), which was no longer present after treatment (right).

Typhlitis was considered unlikely because the absolute neutrophil count remained above 2.0 × 109/L and there were no features of neutropenic enterocolitis. Infection was ruled out based on normal white blood cell, procalcitonin levels and negative testing for respiratory viruses, despite the presence of fever (7). Based on clinical findings and Doppler ultrasonography, a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP) was established. Although AP has been reported in adults receiving multidrug chemotherapy, vincristine is usually considered the least likely causative agent. In this case, a Naranjo score of 7 supported probable vincristine-induced AP (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale for vincristine-induced acute pancreatitis (14).

Supportive management was initiated, including fasting, intravenous nutrition (∼40 kcal/kg/day, total volume 720 mL), octreotide, ulinastatin, and omeprazole to suppress pancreatic stimulation. By Day 13, the child's fever had resolved, abdominal pain had subsided, and amylase levels began to decline. By Day 15, abdominal pain had completely resolved and serum amylase had decreased to 269 U/L (Figure 2). A liquid diet was reintroduced. Octreotide and parenteral nutrition were maintained until sustained enzyme decline and symptom resolution, after which enteral feeding resumed. Two follow-up ultrasounds showed no pancreatic abnormalities. CEP72 genotyping revealed no pathogenic variant.

Figure 2
Line graph showing serum amylase levels (U/L) from 0 to 3000 over 30 days post-vincristine. Levels peak atover 2500 U/L on day three, then decline near baseline by daytwelve with vinesine treatment. Discharge occurs on day thirty.

Figure 2. Relationship between changes in amylase levels and the timing of vincristine administration during hospitalization. Arrows indicate the timing of subsequent chemotherapy drug administration.

Given the suspected association with vincristine, the chemotherapy regimen was modified by substituting vindesine. Over two subsequent triple-drug cycles and additional vindesine monotherapy, no recurrence of AP occurred.

Discussion

Vincristine is a key chemotherapeutic agent for pediatric malignancies such as leukemia, lymphoma, and certain solid tumors (8). However, vincristine carries notable toxicity risks, largely attributable to its effects on nervous tissue and rapidly dividing cells. Neurotoxicity is the most prominent adverse reaction, typically manifesting as peripheral neuropathy characterized by numbness, tingling, muscle weakness, or motor dysfunction. Additional toxicities include mild myelosuppression, increased susceptibility to infections, and gastrointestinal disturbances (1, 9).

AP is a rare but serious adverse effect of vincristine, with only a few cases documented in adults. In two large reviews, vincristine and vinblastine were classified among the chemotherapeutic agents with the lowest risk of inducing AP (10, 11). Socinski et al. (12) reported two patients with germ cell tumors who developed AP while receiving cisplatin, bleomycin, and vinblastine. Another case described a 64-year-old woman who developed AP during treatment with a multidrug regimen containing vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone, in which vincristine was considered the least likely contributor (13). The scarcity of clinical reports may lead to underestimation of vincristine-induced AP, particularly in children, where abdominal pain is a frequent symptom during chemotherapy and may obscure early recognition of pancreatitis.

In this case, vincristine received a Naranjo score of 7, indicating probable causality (Table 1) (14). First, abdominal pain developed two days after vincristine administration, demonstrating a clear temporal association. Second, alternative etiologies, such as alcohol use, gallstones, hypercalcemia, hyperlipidemia, and hereditary factors, were excluded through physical examination, biochemical testing, and imaging studies. Third, both abdominal pain and pancreatic enzyme elevations resolved during the subsequent treatment cycle once vincristine was discontinued. Taken together, these findings support vincristine as the most likely causative agent of AP in this patient. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first reported case of vincristine-induced AP in a child.

Drug-induced AP (DIAP) is the second most common etiology of AP in children after biliary causes (15). Evidence is limited, and mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Proposed pathways include immune-mediated reactions, idiosyncratic responses, direct toxicity, accumulation of toxic metabolites, sphincter of Oddi spasm, and genetic susceptibility (7, 16, 17).

The time from drug initiation to the onset of pancreatitis varies according to the underlying mechanism. Immune-mediated adverse drug reactions can induce pancreatitis within weeks of starting therapy, whereas pancreatitis resulting from toxic metabolites typically manifests after several months of use. Hypersensitivity-related AP generally develops within hours to days after drug administration (18). In our patient, hypersensitivity was considered the most likely mechanism. First, the patient experienced abdominal pain just two days after receiving vincristine. Second, the administered dose of vincristine was 0.9 mg, consistent with the recommended dosage, thereby excluding overdose as a contributing factor. This supports a hypersensitivity mediated mechanism, which is typically not dose-dependent.

Direct cytotoxicity was also considered a potential mechanism. Animal studies have shown that vinca alkaloids can cause degeneration of pancreatic acinar cells (19). However, vincristine administration in dogs has not been associated with clinical pancreatitis (20). Genetic predisposition was further evaluated. Reduced expression of the CEP72 gene has been linked to increased vincristine sensitivity and heightened risk of toxicity (9). In this patient, genetic testing revealed a CEP72 genotype of CC (rs924607 C>T), representing a normal genotype. In conclusion, hypersensitivity appears to be the most plausible mechanism underlying vincristine-induced AP in this patient.

Rechallenge with vincristine was avoided for ethical reasons. Vincristine was successfully substituted with vindesine, with no recurrence of AP. Structural differences between the two agents may explain differential toxicity (21). Further research is needed to investigate pharmacokinetics, drug concentrations, and genetic factors that may influence pancreatic toxicity in children receiving vinca alkaloids.

In conclusion, this is the first case report of AP caused by vincristine in pediatric. This case describes a suspected instance of vincristine-induced AP in children with Wilms tumor, with the causality between vincristine and AP deemed probable. While AP caused by vincristine is a rare adverse effect, it can be life-threatening in some cases. Raising awareness of this potential risk is essential. Clinicians and pharmacists should remain vigilant for this adverse drug reaction, closely monitor clinical symptoms, and track key indicators such as amylase and lipase levels. Early detection and prompt intervention are crucial to ensuring the safety of chemotherapy in children.

Patient perspective

The Shenzhen Children's Hospital's Medical Group reviewed and approved all studies involving human participants. The patient's legal guardian provided written informed consent for the publication of this case report.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Shenzhen Children's hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

TL: Data curation, Writing – original draft. ZhC: Investigation, Writing – original draft. FL: Writing – original draft, Methodology. HX: Project administration, Writing – original draft. ZeC: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. XY: Writing – review & editing, Resources. XL: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Guangdong High-level Hospital Construction Fund and the Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (JCYJ20230807093859044).

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1636941/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Triarico S, Romano A, Attinà G, Capozza MA, Maurizi P, Mastrangelo S, et al. Vincristine-Induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) in pediatric tumors: mechanisms, risk factors, strategies of prevention and treatment. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22(8):4112. doi: 10.3390/ijms22084112

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Boxhoorn L, Voermans RP, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Verdonk RC, Boermeester MA, et al. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. (2020) 396(10252):726–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. McBride CE, Yavorski RT, Moses FM, Robson ME, Solimando DA Jr, Byrd JC. Acute pancreatitis associated with continuous infusion cytarabine therapy: a case report. Cancers (Basel). (1996) 77(12):2588–91. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960615)77:12%3C2588::AID-CNCR24%3E3.0.CO;2-N

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Cappell MS, Das KM. Rapid development of pancreatitis following reuse of 6-mercaptopurine. J Clin Gastroenterol. (1989) 11(6):679–81. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198912000-00017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhang W, Luo B, Liu Z, Mi J, Yang Y, Li Y. Pancreatitis induced by pegaspargase in children: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on food and drug administration adverse event reporting system. Preprints (2025). doi: 10.22541/au.173738716.63422238/v1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Vujanić GM, Gessler M, Ooms AHAG, Collini P, Coulomb-l’Hermine A, D’Hooghe E, et al. The UMBRELLA SIOP–RTSG 2016 Wilms tumour pathology and molecular biology protocol. Nat Rev Urol. (2018) 15(11):693–701. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0100-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Yang QJ, Zheng J, Dang FT, Wan YM, Yang J. Acute pancreatitis induced by combination chemotherapy used for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). (2020) 99(35):e21848. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021848

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Clark I, Brougham MFH, Spears N, Mitchell RT. The impact of vincristine on testicular development and function in childhood cancer. Hum Reprod Update. (2023) 29(2):233–45. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Van De Velde ME, Uittenboogaard A, Yang W, Bonten E, Cheng C, Pei D, et al. Genetic polymorphisms associated with vincristine pharmacokinetics and vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric oncology patients. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 14(14):3510. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143510

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Murtaza G, Faqah A, Konowitz N, Lu H, Kuruvilla A, Adhikari S. Acute pancreatitis related to a chemotherapy drug. World J Oncol. (2017) 8(1):18–9. doi: 10.14740/wjon1006e

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Puckett JB, Willam MB. Pancreatitis and chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med. (1982) 97(3):453–53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-453_1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Socinski MA, Garnick MB. Acute pancreatitis associated with chemotherapy for germ cell tumors in two patients. Ann Intern Med. (1988) 108(4):567. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-4-567

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Selami KT, Serkan O, Betul E, Emre Y, Reskan A, Sema K, et al. Acute pancreatitis following VAD chemotherapy combination consisting of vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in a newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patient: a case report. Int J Oncol. (2012) 8(2). doi: 10.5580/2b68

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. (1981) 30(2):239–45. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Husain SZ, Srinath AI. What’s unique about acute pancreatitis in children: risk factors, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2017) 14(6):366–72. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.13

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Jones MR, Hall OM, Kaye AM, Kaye AD. Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: a review. Ochsner J. (2015) 15(1):45–51.25829880

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

17. Lee PJ, Papachristou GI. New insights into acute pancreatitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2019) 16(8):479–96. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0158-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Badalov N, Baradarian R, Iswara K, Li J, Steinberg W, Tenner S. Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: an evidence-based review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2007) 5(6):648–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Nevalainen TJ. Cytotoxicity of vinblastine and vincristine to pancreatic acinar cells. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol. (1975) 18(1):119–27. doi: 10.1007/BF02889240

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wright Z, Steiner J, Suchodolski J, Rogers K, Barton C, Brown M. A pilot study evaluating changes in pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity concentrations in canines treated with L-asparaginase (ASNase), vincristine, or both for lymphoma. Can J Vet Res. (2009) 73(2):103–10.19436578

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Banyal A, Tiwari S, Sharma A, Chanana I, Patel SKS, Kulshrestha S, et al. Vinca alkaloids as a potential cancer therapeutics: recent update and future challenges. 3 Biotech. (2023) 13(6):211. doi: 10.1007/s13205-023-03636-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: adverse drug reaction, drug-induced pancreatitis, pancreatitis, pediatric, wilms tumor

Citation: Liu T, Cao Z, Lai F, Xu H, Chen Z, Yuan X and Liu X (2026) Case Report: Vincristine-induced acute pancreatitis in pediatric Wilms tumor: first reported case challenging previous risk classifications and proposing vigilant monitoring protocols. Front. Pediatr. 13:1636941. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1636941

Received: 28 May 2025; Revised: 17 December 2025;
Accepted: 19 December 2025;
Published: 12 January 2026.

Edited by:

Wei Wei, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

Reviewed by:

Shuo Xu, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
Yaqin Wang, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Copyright: © 2026 Liu, Cao, Lai, Xu, Chen, Yuan and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiuli Yuan, MTg5Mzg2OTAyMTJAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Xiaoya Liu, bGl1eHkyOTQ5QDE2My5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.