ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 26 September 2018

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 9 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01044

Tubeimoside 1 Acts as a Chemotherapeutic Synergist via Stimulating Macropinocytosis

  • 1. The Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

  • 2. School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China

  • 3. Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, China

  • 4. School of Public Health, Guangzhou, China

  • 5. Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

  • 6. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

  • 7. Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Abstract

Macropinocytosis is a highly conserved endocytic process which characterizes the engulfment of extracellular fluid and its contents into cells via large, heterogeneous vacuoles known as macropinosomes. Tubeimoside-1 (TBM1) is a low toxic triterpenoid saponin extracted from a traditional Chinese herb Bolbostemma paniculatum (Maxim.). TBM1 stimulates a quick accumulation of numerous phase-lucent cytoplasmic vacuoles in multiple colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines. These vacuoles can be termed as macropinosomes that efficiently engulf lucifer yellow. These vesicles are not overlaps with endocytic organelle tracers, such as ERTracker, LysoTracker and mitoTracker. These vacuoles induced by TBM1 partially incorporate into lysosomes. Transmission electron microscope indicates membrane ruffling to form lamellipodia. Protrusions collapse onto and then fuse back with the plasma membrane to generate these large endocytic vacuoles. Notably, TBM1 efficiently trafficks dextrans into heterotopic xenografts in vivo, thus provide consolidated evidence that the vacuolization can be mainly defined as macropinocytosis. TBM1 downregulates cell viability and increases PI-positive, but not highlighted Hoechst 33342-positive cells. TBM1 induced cell death can be ascribed as methuosis by hyperstimulation of macropinocytosis which can be compromised by amiloride derivative 5-(Nethyl-N-isopropyl). Light chain 3 II is recruited to these vesicles to stimulate macropinocytosis. The cell death and vacuoles can be significantly neutralized by chloroquine, but can not be the inhibited by 3-methyladenine. TBM1 can coordinate with 5-FU to exert toxicity reducing and efficacy enhancing effects in vivo by increasing the uptake of the latter without hepatic injury. In conclusion, TBM1 effectively induces in vitro and in vivo macropinocytosis which can traffick small molecules into CRC cells. It is an attractive drug transporter and can be harnessed as a chemotherapeutic synergist with translational potential.

Introduction

Macromolecules are carried into the cell by invagination and pinching-off of pieces of the plasma membrane in a process termed endocytosis. Endocytosis can be largely devided into two broad categories, ‘phagocytosis’ (the uptake of large particles) and ‘pinocytosis’ (the uptake of fluid and solutes) (Conner and Schmid, 2003). Macropinocytosis is a highly conserved endocytic process by which massive membrane is ruffled and extracellular fluid is ingested concurrently (Henson, 2005). Macropinocytosis has been described as a character of Ras-transformed cancer cells. Macropinocytotic cells uptake ATP and serum album, that are abundant in the tumor microenvironment. It provides additional sources of energy and amino acids, particularly glutamine, for growth, metabolic robustness, and stress tolerance (Commisso et al., 2013; Qian et al., 2014).

Extracellular fluid and its contents are internalized into cells via large, heterogeneous vesicles known as macropinosomes (Commisso et al., 2013). So, the “fluid engulfing” habit of Ras-driven cancers can be exploited as drug delivery system for efficient uptake of anticancer agent (Reyes-Reyes et al., 2010; White, 2013). Activation of macropinocytosis facilitates the entry of Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) into bladder cancer cells which dramatically increase their susceptibility to BCG infection (Redelman-Sidi et al., 2013).

Methuosis has been recently added to the panoply of cell death phenotypes. It is marked by the displacement of the cytoplasm as large fluid-filled vacuoles derived from macropinosomes (Maltese and Overmeyer, 2014). So, the loss of cell viability is preceded by extreme cytoplasmic vacuolization, caused by dysfunctional trafficking of macropinosomes. Tubeimoside 1 (TBM1) is a low toxic natural product with potent anti-tumor activity (Yu et al., 1994). Our research firstly indicates that TBM1 suppresses the viability of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and induces the formation of macropinosomes which capturing large amount of phase-bright fluids. Thereafter, the cell death subroutine induced by tubeimoside I will be identified and the underlying mechanism of macropinocytosis will be discussed further.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Antibodies

5-N-ethyl-N-isopropylamiloride and chloroquine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). Tubeimoside I (National Institutes of Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China), was dissolved in DMSO (MP, France), stored at -20°C. Antibodies against Caspase-3, Cleaved caspase-3, PARP, and LC3 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST), United States. Anti-β-actin antibody was from EarthOx, LLC, San Francisco, CA, United States. Lucifer yellow, Dextran Af-488 and FITC-Dextran were obtained from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen). ER-Tracker Red, Lyso-Tracker Red and Mito-Tracker Green were purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology Corporation (Shanghai, China).

Cell Lines and Cell Culture

Human colon carcinoma cell lines SW480 were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Committee Type Culture Collection Cell Bank (Shanghai, China). SW480 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37°C in a humidified incubator of 5% CO2-containing atmosphere.

Cell Morphology and Cell Viability Assay

SW480 cells were seeded at density of 5 × 103 cells per well in 96 wells plates. After treatment with or without TBM1 for different time, morphological changes were observed by phase-contrast microscopy ( Nikon Eclipse Ti-S). To measure cell viability, MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) (MP, France) was added into each well. Cells were incubated for 4h. The formazan crystals were dissolved in DMSO. The absorbance value was measured at 490 nm. Cell viability was normalized as the percentage of control (Wang et al., 2015).

Western Blotting

Proteins from total cells were extracted by RIPA buffer. The whole-cell Proteins were detected by the BCA (Thermo scientific) method using the Thermo protein assay kit. Equal amount of proteins per lane were separated on 12% SDS–PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore). Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Then, incubations of HRP-conjugated appropriate secondary antibodies were performed for 1 h. Membranes were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Millipore) and exposed by MiniChemiTM II (Beijing, China) (Lin et al., 2014).

Transmission Electron Microscopy

SW480 cells were treated with or without TBM1 for 12 h, After harvest, the cells were washed with cold PBS once, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4°C overnight, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h and subsequently dehydrated. Then samples were embedded, sectioned, doubly stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Finally, Ultrathin sections were observed and captured by transmission electron microscopy (JEM1230, JEOL LTD., Japan) (Xu et al., 2015).

Uptake of Lucifer Yellow and Organelle-Specific Tracers

SW480 cells were treated with 8 μM TBM for 24 h. The medium was removed. Cells were rinsed in HBSS (Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution) and then incubated with 1.5 mg⋅ml-1 Lucifer yellow, a fuild-phase tracer, for 30 min in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator. Lucifer yellow was removed and the cells were washed once with HBSS. To label endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and lysosome, respectively, ER-Tracker Red, Mito-Tracker green, and Lyso-Tracker Red were used according to the instructions supplied by the manufacturer (Beyotime, China). Phase-contrast and fluorescent images were immediately captured on an Nikon C2+confocal microscope.

After treatment with 8 μM TBM1 for 24 h, SW480 cells were cultured with Lyso-tracker Red for 3 h. Then, the cells were washed with phenol red - free RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum and incubated with 0.5 mg⋅ml-1 Dextran Af-488 in the same medium for 4 h. Finally, the cells were washed with the same medium. Phase-contrast and fluorescent images were immediately captured under confocal microscope (Nikon C2+).

Time-Lapse Microscopy

SW480 cells were planted in 35 mm glass-bottom microwell culture dish. After complete adhesion, the cells were treated with 8 μM TBM1 and immediately incubated in a humidified live cell champer of 5% CO2-containing atmosphere at 37°C. The champer was placed on the stage of a confocal microscope (NIKON C2+). The phase-contrast imagines were captured every 30 s for the indicated time.

Animal

Five to six week-old BALB/c-nu/nu male nude mice were purchased from Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center and housed in Experimental Animal Center of Southern Medical university under a specific pathogen-free condition. All animal studies were performed under protocols of The Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health. They were approved by The Laboratory Animals Care and Use Committee of Southern Medical University. 1 × 107 SW480 cells were injected into the right inguen of the mice to generate tumor xenografts. Ten days later, 50 mice were randomly divided into 5 groups. After treatment with or without TBM1, the FITC-Dextran solution was injected into tumor mass. The mice were sacrificed for the experiment, and tumors were dissected (Chunhua et al., 2013).

HPLC Analysis of 5-FU

The tumor tissues were added with 500 μl of 0.9% NaCl and homogenated by homogenizer. An extra-centrifugation step was performed to obtain the supernatant. The supernatant was extracted using EtoAc. EtoAc extraction was dried by Nitrogen, dissolved in mobile phase and filtrated by microporous filter membrane. The assay were performed on a Shimadzu LC-20A HPLC system equipped with UV detector (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The parameter of HPLC was shown as follows. Eclinse XDB-C18 chromatographic column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was selected. Mobile phase consisted of MeOH: H2O = 5 : 95 at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Detection of 5-FU were performed at 260 nm.

Statistical Methods

Parallel experiments were repeated three times. Data was analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. And results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Mean was compared between groups using one Way - ANOVA. When the variance was homogeneous, LSD was used for multiple comparision. Dunnett T3 method was applied for the unequal variances. Mean of two groups was compared with independent samples t-test. A value of P < 0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.

Results

TBM1 Induces Macropinosome Formation

To explore the underlying mechanism of TBM1 induced cell death, the morphological changes of SW480 cells were continuously monitored by phase contrast microscope. Surprisingly, a kind of phase-bright bubble-like structures that filled with liquids were formed in cells treated with TBM1. These translucent cytoplasmic vacuoles began to formed from 30 min upon TBM1 treatment (Figure 1A). These bubble-like vesicles were dose-dependently increased, and then gradually fused into large vacuoles with the prolongation of TBM1 treatment. The size of bubble-like structures were enlarged and the number were reduced, accordingly (Figure 1B).

FIGURE 1

Different dyes for subcellular compartment was used to document the characters of these vacuoles. Lucifer yellow, a fluorescent dye commonly used to define macropinocytosis, incorporated into the bubbles upon TBM1 treatment (Figure 2A, left panel), suggested that TBM1 induced fluid phase uptake might be macropinocytosis. Further, no substantial overlap was observed between the phase-lucent vacuoles and the compartments labeled with ERTracker Red, a tracer of endoplasmic reticulum. Similar results were obtained when the cells were stained with MitoTracker Green (MTG), a mitochondrial-selective fluorescent label (Figure 2A, central panel). However, a small portion of overlap could be found between the phase-lucent vacuoles and the lysosome compartments labeled with LysoTracker Red (Figure 2A, right panel). The coupling between TBM1 induced vacuoles and lysosome was further evidenced by the combined use another fluid-phase marker dextran 488 and lysotracker (Figure 2B). The above observations were repeatable in DLD-1 cells, either (Supplementary Figure S1). These results were consistent with previous report that the overlay between macropinosomes and lysosomes that traffick fluid-phase cargo to the latter (Dolat and Spiliotis, 2016).

FIGURE 2

Lamellipodia was found closing around regions of extracellular fluid to form nascent macropinosomes in cells treated with TBM1 by electron micrographs. The numerous large cytoplasmic vacuoles were morphologically similar to the macropinosomes (Figure 2C). Notably, amiloride derivative 5-(Nethyl-N-isopropyl) (EIPA), a selective inhibitor of macropinocytosis, significantly reduced the vesicles induced by TMB1 (Figure 2D). Taken together, these results support the conclusion that the majority of the phase-lucent vacuoles can be defined as macropinosomes, and some of them fused with lysosomes.

TBM Trafficks Dextrans Into Heterotopic Xenografts in vivo

Macropinocytosis can be harnessed as a drug-delivery strategy to uptake both solid cargo and fluid. To determine the macropinocytic efficiency in xenograft tumors in vivo, SW480 cells were injected subcutaneously into immunodeficient mice as described previously (Commisso et al., 2014). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated dextrans internalized into the tumor efficiently in the presence of TBM1 (Figure 3A). Nearly no trafficking events was observed in mice treated with TBM1 or FITC conjugated dextrans alone (Figure 3B). These results suggested that TBM1 is efficient to internalize lower molecular weight cargo into mice tissues in vivo.

FIGURE 3

TBM1 Inducing Necrosis in CRC Cell Lines

To further evaluate the effects of micropinocytosis on cell death, cell viability was assayed in human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines SW480, DLD-1 and HCT116. The viability of all three cell lines was significantly reduced by TBM1 in dose- and time-dependent manner (Figure 4A). SW480 cells were then double stained with cell-membrane permeable DNA binding dye Hoechst 33342 and cell-membrane impermeable propidium iodide (PI) (Figure 4B). Interestingly, PI-positive, but not highlighted Hoechst 33342 positive, SW480 cells were significantly upregulated with the dose escalation of TBM1 (Figure 4C). These results suggest that the lowered cell viability might be caused by the upregulation of cell necrosis in the condition of TMB1 treatment.

FIGURE 4

TBM1 Hyperstimulates Macropinocytosis to Induce Methuosis

To clarify the subroutine of TBM1 induced cell death, SW480 cells were pre-incubated with 50 μM zVAD-fmk (zVAD, a pan-caspase inhibitor) for 1 hr followed by treatment with TBM1. As showed in Figure 5A, cleavage of caspase 3 and PARP were highly stimulated by staurosporine, a pro-apoptotic agent, but can not be activated by TBM1. The vacuolization (Figure 5B) and cell death (Figure 5C) induced by TBM1 can not be compromised by zVAD pretreatment, suggested that TBM1 induced cell death is not apoptosis. The cell death induced by TBM1 upon zVAD pretreatment was repeated in DLD-1 cells (Supplementary Figure S2).

FIGURE 5

The quick and striking accumulation of numerous phase-lucent cytoplasmic vacuoles might lead to cell death (Maltese and Overmeyer, 2015). Notably, it also compromised the cell death inducd by TBM1 accompanied by the suppression of vacuolation structures. Morphological observation showed that TBM1 increased remnants of ruptured cells. The nuclei were mainly intact and contained diffuse chromatin and a prominent non-fragmented nucleolus. These observations indicated that tubeimoside I induced cell death resemble the necrosis-like forms rather than classic apoptosis. Together, TBM1 stimulates macropinocytosis which extreme expansion of macropinosomes might lead to methuosis (Park et al., 2016).

TBM Recruits LC3-II to Induce Macropinocytosis

It has been noted that macropinosomes are targeted by light chain 3 (LC3) in a manner dependent on autophagy proteins, but independent of autophagosomes (Florey et al., 2011). Our results showed that the amount of membrane-bound LC3-II (the phosphatidylethanolamine-conjugated form) was significantly upregulated by TBM1 (Figure 6A and Supplementary Figure S3). It was also elevated by serum starvation and rapamycin, two classic autophagy inducers (Park et al., 2016). The expression of LC3-II was enhanced by chloroquine (CQ) (Figure 6B). Consistent with the previous report, TBM1 induced vacuoles can be significantly reduced by CQ (Figures 6C,E and Supplementary Figure S3), but can not be the inhibited by autophagosome inhibitor 3-MA (Figure 6D). The lowered viability induced by TBM1 can also be compromised by CQ pretreatment, either (Figure 6F). Taken together, LC3 is recruited in the hyperstimulation of macropinocytosis which leads to declined viability (Florey et al., 2011).

FIGURE 6

TBM1 Increases 5-FU Intake to Exert Synergistic Anticancer Effects

To explore the potential anti-neoplastic of TBM1, the direct and synergistic antitumoral effects of TBM1 was further tested in tumor-bearing mice in vivo. The tumor size was only mildly lowered by TBM1 or 5-FU treatment alone. However, the tumor growth was significantly suppressed by 5-FU and TBM1 treatment synergistically (Figure 7). Together, TBM1 might coordinates with anticancer agents to amplify their anticancer efficacy.

FIGURE 7

We hypothesized that TBM1 enhances the anticancer effects of 5-FU by increasing its internalization. HPLC analysis showed the contents of 5-FU were significantly promoted in tumor tissues pretreated with TMB1 (Figure 7C and Supplementary Figure S4). Furthermore, the liver function tests showed that the level of serum alanine amino-transferase (ALT), aspartate amino-transferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase acid (Supplementary Table S1) are all in the normal range value. Taken together, TBM1 synergizes the anticancer effects of 5-FU by increasing the internalization of the latter without hepatic injury.

Discussion

Tubeimoside induces the formation of numerous vesicular-like structures rapidly. The large electron-lucent vacuoles were clearly distinct from smaller structures fitting the description of classic autophagosomes, which have double membranes surrounding luminal cytoplasmic contents (Seo et al., 2016). By labeling endocytic organelles with ERTracker, LysoTracker and mitoTracker, endosomes and mitophagy can be ruled out (Valdivia et al., 2017). Our results are consistent with the characterization of a minimal fusion between macropinocytotic vacuoles and lysosomes (Overmeyer et al., 2008). The examination with transmission electron microscope indicates protrusions collapse onto and fuse back with the plasma membrane to generate large endocytic vesicles (Marques et al., 2017; Valdivia et al., 2017). The vacuoles were generally devoid of cytoplasmic components or organelles, although some contained unidentified membranous inclusions or small quantities of amorphous electron-dense material. Uptake of lucifer yellow provides consolidated evidence that TBM1 induced vacuolization can be mainly defined as macropincytosis which subsequently leads to methuosis (Manara et al., 2016; Cingolani et al., 2017).

Morphological analysis indicates that nuclear fragmentation, reduction of cellular and nuclear volume, and plasma membrane blebbing can not be observed in cells treated with TBM1. zVAD pretreatment can not rescue the cell death, suggest that TBM1 induced cell death is distinct from apoptosis (Kroemer et al., 2009; Galluzzi et al., 2011). Cytoplasmic swelling and moderate chromatin condensation indicate that TBM1 induced cell death resembles the character of necrosis (Kroemer et al., 2009). Necrosis has long been accepted as a passive or accidental cytolytic process provoked by cell injury or metabolic catastrophe. However, it has been updated recently that necrosis can be regulated by some specific inhibitors (Degterev et al., 2005; Galluzzi and Kroemer, 2008; Cho et al., 2009). So, although still controversial, TBM induced methuosis represents a novel cell death and might be a subtype of necrosis (Cai et al., 2013; Maltese and Overmeyer, 2014; Diederich and Cerella, 2016).

Tubeimoside induces the formation of single-membrane vacuoles that are different from double-membrane autophagosomes. However, LC3 recruitment is indispensable for the formation of macropinocytic vacuoles (Florey et al., 2011). Further evidence show that macropinosomes are targeted by LC3, in a manner dependent on autophagy proteins, but independent of autophagosomes. Chloroquine increases the autophagosomes as it inhibits their fusion with lysosome. However, it suppresses number of macropinosomes, suggested that TBM1 induced vacuoles are different from autogosomes (Seo et al., 2016).

Our research provides consolidated evidence that TBM1 induces macropinocytosis in vivo and in vitro. Notably, it coordinates with 5-FU and enhances the chemotherapy effect of the latter. So, TBM1 can be harnessed as a chemotherapeutic synergist by inducing vacuolization. It is also an attractive natural molecular probe to explore the potential link between macropinocytosis and methuosis (Sun et al., 2017). In conclusion, TBM1 is a natural drug transporter that functions as chemotherapeutic synergist via stimulating macropinocytosis.

Statements

Author contributions

XG and XS designed the experiments, supervised, and participated in the entire work. XG, RS, ZG, YL, LZ, and LJ maintained and performed cell and animal studies, microscopic observation, and Western blot. WH supported fluorescence analysis. YL, LZ, and XY contributed to data analysis. XS wrote and edited the manuscript. RS and XS revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (81573848 and 81774172), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2014A030313323 and 2017A030313903), Combined Science Technology Project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology and Guangdong Provincial Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2014A020221011), Planned Science Technology Project of Guangzhou (201607010146), and Guangdong Province Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Research Project (Nos. 20151024 and 20161161).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2018.01044/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    CaiH.LiuJ.FanQ.LiX. (2013). [Methuosis: a novel type of cell death].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao3318441847.

  • 2

    ChoY. S.ChallaS.MoquinD.GengaR.RayT. D.GuildfordM.et al (2009). Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation.Cell13711121123. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.037

  • 3

    ChunhuaL.DonglanL.XiuqiongF.LihuaZ.QinF.YaweiL.et al (2013). Apigenin up-regulates transgelin and inhibits invasion and migration of colorectal cancer through decreased phosphorylation of AKT.J. Nutr. Biochem.2417661775. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.03.006

  • 4

    CingolaniF.SimbariF.AbadJ. L.CasasampereM.FabriasG.FutermanA. H.et al (2017). Jaspine B induces nonapoptotic cell death in gastric cancer cells independently of its inhibition of ceramide synthase.J. Lipid Res.5815001513. 10.1194/jlr.M072611

  • 5

    CommissoC.DavidsonS. M.Soydaner-AzelogluR. G.ParkerS. J.KamphorstJ. J.HackettS.et al (2013). Macropinocytosis of protein is an amino acid supply route in Ras-transformed cells.Nature497633637. 10.1038/nature12138

  • 6

    CommissoC.FlinnR. J.Bar-SagiD. (2014). Determining the macropinocytic index of cells through a quantitative image-based assay.Nat. Protoc.9182192. 10.1038/nprot.2014.004

  • 7

    ConnerS. D.SchmidS. L. (2003). Regulated portals of entry into the cell.Nature4223744. 10.1038/nature01451

  • 8

    DegterevA.HuangZ.BoyceM.LiY.JagtapP.MizushimaN.et al (2005). Chemical inhibitor of nonapoptotic cell death with therapeutic potential for ischemic brain injury.Nat. Chem. Biol.1112119. 10.1038/nchembio711

  • 9

    DiederichM.CerellaC. (2016). Non-canonical programmed cell death mechanisms triggered by natural compounds.Semin. Cancer Biol.4041, 434. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.06.001

  • 10

    DolatL.SpiliotisE. T. (2016). Septins promote macropinosome maturation and traffic to the lysosome by facilitating membrane fusion.J. Cell Biol.214517527. 10.1083/jcb.201603030

  • 11

    FloreyO.KimS. E.SandovalC. P.HaynesC. M.OverholtzerM. (2011). Autophagy machinery mediates macroendocytic processing and entotic cell death by targeting single membranes.Nat. Cell Biol.1313351343. 10.1038/ncb2363

  • 12

    GalluzziL.KroemerG. (2008). Necroptosis: a specialized pathway of programmed necrosis.Cell13511611163. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.004

  • 13

    GalluzziL.VitaleI.AbramsJ. M.AlnemriE. S.BaehreckeE. H.BlagosklonnyM. V.et al (2011). Molecular definitions of cell death subroutines: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2012.Cell Death Differ.19107120. 10.1038/cdd.2011.96

  • 14

    HensonP. M. (2005). Engulfment: ingestion and migration with Rac, Rho and TRIO.Curr. Biol.15R29R30. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.017

  • 15

    KroemerG.GalluzziL.VandenabeeleP.AbramsJ.AlnemriE. S.BaehreckeE. H.et al (2009). Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009.Cell Death Differ.16311. 10.1038/cdd.2008.150

  • 16

    LinX.YiZ.DiaoJ.ShaoM.ZhaoL.CaiH.et al (2014). ShaoYao decoction ameliorates colitis-associated colorectal cancer by downregulating proinflammatory cytokines and promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition.J. Transl. Med.12:105. 10.1186/1479-5876-12-105

  • 17

    MalteseW. A.OvermeyerJ. H. (2014). Methuosis: nonapoptotic cell death associated with vacuolization of macropinosome and endosome compartments.Am. J. Pathol.18416301642. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.02.028

  • 18

    MalteseW. A.OvermeyerJ. H. (2015). Non-apoptotic cell death associated with perturbations of macropinocytosis.Front. Physiol.6:38. 10.3389/fphys.2015.00038

  • 19

    ManaraM. C.TerraccianoM.MancarellaC.SciandraM.GuerzoniC.PaselloM.et al (2016). CD99 triggering induces methuosis of Ewing sarcoma cells through IGF-1R/RAS/Rac1 signaling.Oncotarget77992579942. 10.18632/oncotarget.13160

  • 20

    MarquesP. E.GrinsteinS.FreemanS. A. (2017). SnapShot:Macropinocytosis.Cell169766766.e1. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.031

  • 21

    OvermeyerJ. H.KaulA.JohnsonE. E.MalteseW. A. (2008). Active RAS triggers death in glioblastoma cells through hyperstimulation of macropinocytosis.Mol. Cancer Res.6965977. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2036

  • 22

    ParkJ. M.JungC. H.SeoM.OttoN. M.GrunwaldD.KimK. H.et al (2016). The ULK1 complex mediates MTORC1 signaling to the autophagy initiation machinery via binding and phosphorylating ATG14.Autophagy12547564. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1140293

  • 23

    QianY.WangX.LiuY.LiY.ColvinR. A.TongL.et al (2014). Extracellular ATP is internalized by macropinocytosis and induces intracellular ATP increase and drug resistance in cancer cells.Cancer Lett.351242251. 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.06.008

  • 24

    Redelman-SidiG.IyerG.SolitD. B.GlickmanM. S. (2013). Oncogenic activation of Pak1-dependent pathway of macropinocytosis determines BCG entry into bladder cancer cells.Cancer Res.7311561167. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1882

  • 25

    Reyes-ReyesE. M.TengY.BatesP. J. (2010). A new paradigm for aptamer therapeutic AS1411 action: uptake by macropinocytosis and its stimulation by a nucleolin-dependent mechanism.Cancer Res.7086178629. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0920

  • 26

    SeoJ. W.ChoiJ.LeeS. Y.SungS.YooH. J.KangM. J.et al (2016). Autophagy is required for PDAC glutamine metabolism.Sci. Rep.6:37594. 10.1038/srep37594

  • 27

    SunL.LiB.SuX.ChenG.LiY.YuL.et al (2017). An ursolic acid derived small molecule triggers cancer cell death through hyperstimulation of macropinocytosis.J. Med. Chem.6066386648. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00592

  • 28

    ValdiviaA.GoicoecheaS. M.AwadiaS.ZinnA.Garcia-MataR. (2017). Regulation of circular dorsal ruffles, macropinocytosis, and cell migration by RhoG and its exchange factor, Trio.Mol. Biol. Cell2817681781. 10.1091/mbc.E16-06-0412

  • 29

    WangQ.ZengP.LiuY.WenG.FuX.SunX. (2015). Inhibition of autophagy ameliorates atherogenic inflammation by augmenting apigenin-induced macrophage apoptosis.Int. Immunopharmacol.272431. 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.04.018

  • 30

    WhiteE. (2013). Exploiting the bad eating habits of Ras-driven cancers.Genes Dev.2720652071. 10.1101/gad.228122.113

  • 31

    XuW.JingL.WangQ.LinC. C.ChenX.DiaoJ.et al (2015). Bax-PGAM5L-Drp1 complex is required for intrinsic apoptosis execution.Oncotarget63001730034. 10.18632/oncotarget.5013

  • 32

    YuL.MaR.WangY.NishinoH. (1994). Potent anti-tumor activity and low toxicity of tubeimoside 1 isolated from Bolbostemma paniculatum.Planta Med.60204208. 10.1055/s-2006-959459

Summary

Keywords

tubeimoside 1, chemotherapeutic synergist, macropinocytosis, methuosis, endocytosis

Citation

Gong X, Sun R, Gao Z, Han W, Liu Y, Zhao L, Jing L, Yao X and Sun X (2018) Tubeimoside 1 Acts as a Chemotherapeutic Synergist via Stimulating Macropinocytosis. Front. Pharmacol. 9:1044. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01044

Received

08 May 2018

Accepted

27 August 2018

Published

26 September 2018

Volume

9 - 2018

Edited by

Zhiling Yu, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

Reviewed by

Ying Wang, Jinan University, China; WU Yunxia, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Xuegang Sun,

This article was submitted to Ethnopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics