GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Pharmacol., 23 February 2021

Sec. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics

Volume 12 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.603345

Commentary: The Clinical Impact of the C0/D Ratio and the CYP3A5 Genotype on Outcome in Tacrolimus Treated Kidney Transplant Recipients

  • 1. Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Hospital of Münster Marienhospital Steinfurt, Steinfurt, Germany

  • 2. Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany

Article metrics

View details

2

Citations

1,7k

Views

658

Downloads

Introduction

Van Gelder et al. nicely reviewed about the influence of the C0/D ratio and the CYP3A5 genotype on the outcome of kidney transplant (KTx) recipients treated with tacrolimus (Tac) (van Gelder et al., 2020). The authors report that our group has shown that fast Tac metabolism (C0/D ratio <1.05 ng/ml/mg) is associated with a faster decline in renal function, a higher incidence of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity (CNIT) and BK nephropathy and a lower survival rate (Tholking et al., 2014; Tholking et al., 2016; Schutte-Nutgen et al., 2019; Tholking et al., 2019). They comment that there is no evidence that switching from Tac to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) or other substances improves long-term outcome.

Conversion of Fast Metabolizers to mTORi

Recently, we published data of 34 KTx recipients (17 patients with a Tac C0/D ratio <1.05 ng/mL/mg vs. 17 patients with a C0/D ratio ≥1.05 ng/ml/mg (slow metabolizers)) whose therapy was converted to the mTORi everolimus within 24 months after KTx (Tholking et al., 2020). 36 months after switching from immediate-release Tac (IR-Tac) to everolimus, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased noticeably in fast metabolizers and slow metabolizers, respectively, compared to baseline (+11.0 ± 11.7 (p = 0.005) and +9.4 ± 15.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.049). Adverse events did not differ noticeably between both groups. Although our reported single center sample size data has limitations, we believe that a conversion from Tac to everolimus is safe and beneficial for renal function in KTx recipients who developed CNIT in particular.

Conversion of Fast Metabolizers to LCPT

In a subsequent study on liver transplant recipients (LTR), we analyzed whether the renal function benefits from an increase of the bioavailability of tacrolimus (von Einsiedel et al., 2020). LTR were converted from IR-Tac or once-daily extended-release Tac (ER-Tac)) to MeltDose® Tac (LCPT). In LTR switched to LCPT, the daily Tac dose decreased by 33.3% and the C0/D ratio had increased by 50% 12 months after conversion due to the higher bioavailability of LCPT. Patients converted to LCPT showed a significant increase in mean eGFR already 6 months after the switch (67.5 vs. 65.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline; p = 0.029), which was even more pronounced 12 months after the conversion (70.9 vs. 65.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline; p = 0.001). We concluded that a conversion from IR-Tac to LCPT increased the C0/D ratio and improved renal function in LTR possibly by flattening the Tac blood concentration curve and lowering peak levels.

Conclusion

Despite limited data on long-term outcome in recipients of solid organ transplants after conversion from IR- or ER-Tac to other immunosuppressants, we have already shown it can be safe and useful in transplant patients with Tac-related adverse effects.

Statements

Author contributions

GT developed the idea on the General Commentary. GT and SR wrote the draft. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    Schutte-NutgenK.TholkingG.SteinkeJ.PavenstadtH.SchmidtR.SuwelackB.et al (2019). Fast tac metabolizers at risk (-) it is time for a C/D ratio calculation. J. Clin. Med.8 (5), 587. 10.3390/jcm8050587

  • 2

    ThölkingG.FortmannC.KochR.GerthH. U.PabstD.PavenstädtH.et al (2014). The tacrolimus metabolism rate influences renal function after kidney transplantation. PloS One9 (10), e111128. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111128

  • 3

    ThölkingG.SchmidtC.KochR.Schuette-NuetgenK.PabstD.WoltersH.et al (2016). Influence of tacrolimus metabolism rate on BKV infection after kidney transplantation. Sci. Rep.6, 32273. 10.1038/srep32273

  • 4

    TholkingG.GillhausN. H.Schutte-NutgenK.PavenstadtH.KochR.SuwelackB.et al (2020). Conversion to everolimus was beneficial and safe for fast and slow tacrolimus metabolizers after renal transplantation. J. Clin. Med.9 (2), 328. 10.3390/jcm9020328

  • 5

    TholkingG.Schutte-NutgenK.SchmitzJ.RovasA.DahmenM.BautzJ.et al (2019). A low tacrolimus concentration/dose ratio increases the risk for the development of acute calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity. J. Clin. Med.8 (10), 1586. 10.3390/jcm8101586

  • 6

    van GelderT.MeziyerhS.SwenJ. J.de VriesA. P. J.MoesD. J. A. R. (2020). The clinical impact of the C0/D ratio and the CYP3A5 genotype on outcome in tacrolimus treated kidney transplant recipients. Front. Pharmacol.11, 1142. 10.3389/fphar.2020.01142

  • 7

    von EinsiedelJ.ThölkingG.WilmsC.VoronaE.BokemeyerA.SchmidtH. H.et al (2020). Conversion from standard-release tacrolimus to MeltDose® tacrolimus (LCPT) improves renal function after liver transplantation. J. Clin. Med.9 (6), 1654. 10.3390/jcm9061654

Summary

Keywords

kidney, metabolism, C/D ratio, tacrolimus, transplantation, renal

Citation

Thölking G and Reuter S (2021) Commentary: The Clinical Impact of the C0/D Ratio and the CYP3A5 Genotype on Outcome in Tacrolimus Treated Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front. Pharmacol. 12:603345. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.603345

Received

07 October 2020

Accepted

11 January 2021

Published

23 February 2021

Volume

12 - 2021

Edited by

Vita Dolzan, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

Reviewed by

Anders Åsberg, University of Oslo, Norway

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Gerold Thölking,

This article was submitted to Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics