Impact Factor 2.129 | CiteScore 2.40
More on impact ›

Review ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Psychol. | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02378

On the education about/of radical embodied cognition

 John v. Kamp1, 2*,  Rob Withagen3 and Dominic Orth4
  • 1Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 2Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands
  • 3University of Groningen, Netherlands
  • 4Swinburne University of Technology, Australia

In mainstream or strong university education, the teacher selects and transmits knowledge and skills that students are to acquire and reproduce. Many researchers of radical embodied cognitive science still adhere to this way of teaching, even though this prescriptive pedagogy deeply contrasts with the theoretical underpinnings of their science. In this paper, we search for alternative ways of teaching that are more aligned with the central non-prescriptive and non-representational tenets of radical embodied cognitive science. To this end, we discuss recent views on education by Tim Ingold and Gert Biesta, which are based upon Dewey’s philosophy of pragmatism and Gibsons’ ecological approach. The paper starts by introducing radical embodied cognitive science, particularly as it relates to motor skill learning, one of our prime interests in research and teaching. Next, we provide a synopsis and critique of the still dominant prescriptive and explicating pedagogy of strong education. Following Ingold and Biesta, we search for a weak alternative through a careful consideration of the education of attention and the participating teacher. To illustrate our arguments, we use examples of the first author’s teaching about/of motor skill learning. The paper is concluded by briefly considering the implications of weak education for a radical embodied science of motor skill learning.

Keywords: Education, radical embodied cognition, pedagogy, motor learning, ecological psychology

Received: 04 Jun 2019; Accepted: 07 Oct 2019.

Copyright: © 2019 Kamp, Withagen and Orth. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. John v. Kamp, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands,