Abstract
A lot of previous studies have documented that major depressive disorder (MDD) is a developmental disorder. The cortical surface measure, local gyrification index (LGI), can well reflect the fetal and early postnatal neurodevelopmental processes. Thus, LGI may provide new insight for the neuropathology of MDD. The previous studies only focused on the surface structural abnormality, but how the structural abnormality lead to functional connectivity changes is unexplored. In this study, we investigated LGI and corresponding functional connectivity difference in 28 medication-free MDD patients. We found significantly decreased LGI in left lingual gyrus (LING) and right posterior superior temporal sulcus (bSTS), and the changed LGI in bSTS was negatively correlated with disease onset age and anxiety scores. The following functional connectivity analyses identified decreased functional connectivities between LING and right LING, precentral gyrus, and middle temporal gyrus. The decreased functional connectivities were correlated with disease duration, onset, and depression symptoms. Our findings revealed abnormal LGI in LING and bSTS indicating that the abnormal developmental of visual and social cognition related brain areas may be an early biomarker for depression.
Introduction
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorder and the leading causes of ill health and disability worldwide (1, 2). Although a large number of studies have revealed structural and functional abnormalities in MDD patients (3–12), the underlaying neural basis of MDD is still unclear. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that neurodevelopmental variation was related to the increased lifetime risk for the onset of MDD suggesting variations of cortical development may contribute largely to the neuropathology of MDD (13–15). Therefore, characterization of the cortical developmental patterns may provide a new way to reveal the neuronal basis of MDD.
The cortical structural changes in MDD are usually studied with voxel-based morphometry approach to delineate the cortical gray matter volume. Given that gray matter volume includes the information of cortical thickness, surface area, and cortical folding (16), thus, to direct investigation of thickness, surface area, and cortical folding patterns which reflect different biological factors is better and more accurate to reveal the structural alterations in MDD (17, 18). The cortical thickness and surface area mainly characterize the neuronal density and the number and spacing of cortical columns, respectively (19–21). The cortical folding defined by local gyrification index (LGI) is considered to be related to the fetal and early postnatal neurodevelopmental processes (22–24). Thus, LGI is the most ideal method to investigate the abnormal neurodevelopmental patterns in MDD. With LGI method, some studies have found the changed LGI in MDD compared to healthy controls (25–27). Schmitgen et al. (27) found significantly greater LGI in frontal, cingulate, parietal, temporal, and occipital regions in MDD patients. Han et al. (26) found increased LGI in rostral anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex and frontal pole in MDD patients using region of interest analysis. In addition, Zhang et al. found decreased LGI in middle cingulate cortex, insula, orbital frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex and temporal operculum (25). Although these studies found abnormal LGI in MDD, the studies of Schmitgen et al. (27) and Han et al. (26) included the patients with medication and the study of Zhang et al. (25) only included a small sample drug-naïve MDD patients (18 patients). Moreover, the previou findigns in different studies varied greatly, which needs to be further validated. In addition, the previous studies only revealed the LGI changes, but the associated changes of functional couplings are unexplored.
In this study, we applied the LGI method to study the abnormal development effects on brain structure and corresponding functional connectivities in 28 medication-free MDD patients and 30 gender-, age-, education-level matched healthy controls.
Materials and Methods
Participants
Twenty-eight medication-free in the current episode MDD patients were recruited from the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and diagnosed with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria. Thirty gender-, age-, and educational level matched healthy controls (HC) were also recruited. All participants were right-handed, and the severities of depressive and anxious symptoms were rated using 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) (28) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) (29), respectively. In this study, the subjects who were left-handed, substance dependence, pregnant, life threatening somatic disease, neurological disorders, other comorbid mental disorders or MRI-related contraindications were excluded. All the subjects provided written informed consent. The study was in accordance with the latest revision of the declaration of Helsinki and fully approved by the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Ethics Committee. The demographic and psychological characteristics of the samples are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
| MDD (n = 30) | HC (n = 28) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 33.43 ± 11.76 | 32.00 ±9.13 | 0.61 |
| Gender (male/female) | 10/20 | 10/18 | 0.85 |
| Education level | 13.75 ± 4.05 | 13.5± 3.04 | 0.79 |
| Onset age (years) | 31.90 ± 12.23 | ||
| Duration of illness (weeks) | 92.66 ± 122.81 | ||
| HRSD scores | 31.2 ± 6.90 | ||
| HAMA scores | 19.48 ± 7.08 |
Demographics and clinical characteristics of the subjects used in present study.
A Pearson chi-squared test was used for gender comparison. Two-sample t-tests were used for age, education comparisons. HRSD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale score; MDD, major depression disorder; HC, healthy control.
MRI Data Acquisition
All the subjects MRI data were scanned using a 3.0-Tesla Philips MR imaging system from the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. They were instructed to keep their eyes closed, be relaxed, awake, and not to think of anything during the scan. The T1-weighted anatomic images were acquired with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 8.2 ms, echo time (TE) = 3.7 ms, flip angle (FA) = 7°; field of view (FOV) = 256 × 256 mm2; acquisition matrix = 256 × 256; voxels size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3. Resting-state fMRI data were also collected with parameters: TR/TE = 2000/30 ms, acquisition matrix = 64 × 64, slice thickness = 4 mm with inter-slice gap = 0.6 mm, 33 slices, voxel resolution = 3.44 × 3.44 × 4.6 mm, 240 volumes.
Resting-State fMRI Preprocessing
All the resting-state fMRI data were preprocessed using DPARSFA software (http://www.restfmri.net/forum/DPARSF). The pre-processing steps included: (1), discarding the first 10 volumes for magnetization equilibrium; (2) slice timing for correcting within-scan acquisition differences between slices; (3) registering all the remaining images to the first volume to correct head motion; (4) spatial normalization to the standard EPI template and resampled to 3 mm3 voxels and smoothing with 6 mm Gaussian kernel; (5) detrending was performed to remove the linear drift; (6) Friston 24-parameter model of head motion, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and global mean signals were regressed out and filtered with band pass 0.01–0.1 Hz. To exclude the head motion effects, if the subjects with head motion exceeding 3 mm or 3° were excluded, and no subjects were excluded under this criterion. Furthermore, a scrubbing method was conducted to exclude bad images with the mean frame displacement (FD) above 0.5 mm, and one volume before and two volumes after the bad volume were discarded (30).
Surface LGI Analyses
Cortical LGI analysis were performed on T1 structure image using the the Freesurfer 5.0 toolkit (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) with the following steps: first, all the subjects were processed using the fully automated FreeSurfer “recon-all” standard procedure; Then, non-uniform intensity correction, skull stripping, Talairach transforms, normalization and atlas registration, subcortical segmentation, surfaces reconstruction, cortical atlas registration and segmentation were performed. Next, the LGI was calculated by measuring the ratio of local surface area to the outer hull layer that tightly wraps the pial surface (31), which is an indication of sulcal cortex buried in its locality and thus denotes the extent of cortical folding (32). Finally, the LGI of the left and right hemisphere were smoothed with a circularly symmetric Gaussian kernel of 5 mm full width half maximum to provide normal distribution of the results. To identify the LGI differences between MDD and HC, independent two-sample t-tests were performed, and the results were corrected for multiple comparisons using Monte Carlo simulation (a pre-cached cluster-wise level of p < 0.05, a voxel-wise level of p < 0.001).
Resting-State Functional Connectivity Analyses
After the LGI analyses, the surface areas with changed LGI were taken as seed regions for functional connectivity (FC) analyses which was measured using Pearson correlation coefficients. To calculate functional connectivity analysis, the peak coordinates of the seed regions were first obtained and were transformed to MNI space to create spheres with 6 mm radium. Then, the Pearson correlation coefficients between the mean time series of each seed region and that of each voxel of the whole brain were calculated. Next, all the FCs were converted to Z values to improve normality using Fisher r-to-z transformation. Finally, independent two-sample t-tests (FD value as covariant) were performed to identify the functional connectivity differences between MDD and HCs. The significance was determined using a cluster-level Alphasim corrected threshold of p < 0.05 (cluster-forming threshold at voxel-level p < 0.001, and minimum cluster size = 56).
Correlation Analyses
To determine the relationship between LGI, resting-state FCs and HRSD, HAMA scores, Pearson's correlation analyses were conducted. The significance was set at a threshold of p < 0.05.
Results
Clinical Characteristics
There were no significant difference in gender (p = 0.85), age (p = 0.61), and education levels (p = 0.79) between MDD patients and HCs (Table 1).
Vertex-Wise Differences in LGI
Decreased vertex-wise LGI values were observed in the left lingual gyrus (LING), and right posterior superior temporal sulcus (bSTS) in MDD patients compared to HCs (Figure 1, Table 2).
Figure 1
Table 2
| Parameters | Brain regions | BA | Peak MNI coordinates | t value | Cluster size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | |||||
| LGI: | Lingual gyrus | 18 | −15 | −71 | 8 | −3.81 | 2,188 |
| Superior temporal sulcus | 21 | 67 | −47 | 3 | −3.53 | 2,250 | |
| FC: | Precentral gyrus | 4 | 25 | −29 | 72 | −4.34 | 98 |
| Anterior temporal gyrus | 21 | 59 | 6 | −13 | −4.21 | 122 | |
| Lingual gyrus | 19 | 26 | −57 | −3 | −3.89 | 65 | |
Regions with differences in LGI and FC in MDD patients.
LGI, local gyrification index; FC, functional connectivity; BA, Brodmann area; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; MDD, major depression disorder.
Functional Connectivity Analyses
Resting-state functional connectivity analyses only identified significant decrease of FCs between left lingual gyrus and right dorsal precentral gyrus (PreCG), right anterior temporal gyrus, right lingual gyrus in MDD patients (Figure 2, Table 2). No significant difference in FCs of bSTS was found.
Figure 2
Correlation Analyses
Correlation analyses identified significantly negative associations between the LGI values of bSTS and HAMA scores (r = −0.425, p = 0.022) (Figure 3). The FCs between left and right lingual gyrus were negatively correlated disease duration (r = −0.636, p = 0.003), and the FCs between left lingual gyrus and right dorsal PreCG were negatively correlated HRSD scores (r = −0.47, p = 0.037) (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Discussion
In the current study, we found that MDD patients showed decreased LGI in left lingual gyrus, right posterior superior temporal sulcus and decreased functional connectivities between left lingual gyrus and right lingual gyrus, dorsal precentral gyrus, anterior superior temporal gyrus. Moreover, the LGI values in left lingual gyrus, functional connectivity between left and right lingual gyrus, functional connectivity between left lingual gyrus and right dorsal precentral gyrus were negatively corrected with HAMA scores, disease duration, and HRSD scores, respectively. All these findings indicated that LGI and functional connectivity are effective tools to reveal the abnormal developmental effects on brain structure and function in MDD patients.
In this study, the decreased LGI in MDD patients compared to healthy controls was found. There are two prevalent theories, including tension-based theory and convolutional development theory, were proposed to account for cortical folding (33, 34). The tension-based theory considers that the cortical folding is related to the forces driving the extensive wiring of cortico-cortical connections along the cortical surface while convolutional development theory thinks that differential growth rates of cortical layers affect the degree of cortical folding. Thus, LGI is a good method to reflect the early neurodevelopment of brain. The decreased LGI in left lingual gyrus and right anterior superior temporal gyrus in MDD might be induced by disrupted development of early white matter or cortical structures.
We found significantly decreased LGI in the left lingual gyrus and the decreased functional connections of left lingual gyrus with right lingual gyrus, dorsal precentral gyrus, and anterior superior temporal gyrus. The abnormal LGI in lingual gyrus was supported by the study of Schmitgen et al. (27). But in Schmitgen et al. (27) study, they found increased LGI in lingual gyrus in MDD patients. The discrepancy may result from the inhomogeneity of the MDD patients used in the two studies and the medication effects. The MDD patients in our study are medication-free but 25 of 38 patients in Schmitgen et al. (27) study received medication treatment. Compared with Zhang et al. (25) and Han et al. (26) studies, no consistent finding of LGI was found. The inconsistency may be due to the differences in sample size and analytical method. The study of Zhang et al. (25) only included 18 MDD patients, and the study of Han et al. (26) only analyzed the LGI in prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex using region of interest method. Moreover, the lingual gyrus is an important area of ventral visual processing stream and visual recognition circuit mainly participating in object identification (35) and affect identification (36, 37). The disrupted functional connectivity between visual recognition circuit and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex was reported (7). A recent study also reported the decreased functional connectivity pattern homogeneity in lingual gyrus in MDD patients before and after treatment (38). These findings revealed an important role of lingual gyrus in neuropathology of MDD. In addition, we found disrupted functional connectivities between left lingual gyrus with right lingual gyrus, anterior superior temporal gyrus, and dorsal precentral gyrus, and the functional connectivities between left lingual gyrus with right lingual gyrus and right dorsal precentral gyrus were closely associated with disease duration and depression symptoms, respectively. The decreased functional connections found in MDD patients indicated that depression has long-term effects on the visual cognition and somatosensory processing.
We also found decreased LGI in the posterior superior temporal sulcus in MDD patients. The posterior superior temporal sulcus is a multisensory integration area (39) and plays an important role in language processing (40), biological motion (41), facial processing (42, 43). Moreover, the posterior superior sulcus is also involved in social perception and interaction including recognizing, manipulating, and behaving with respect to socially relevant information (44, 45). Thus, the decreased LGI in posterior superior temporal sulcus may suggest the abnormal social emotion processing in MDD patients. Moreover, we found that the LGI in posterior superior temporal sulcus was negatively correlated with the anxiety symptoms, i.e., HAMA scores, which indicated that the posterior superior temporal sulcus may be mainly related to social anxiety.
There are some limitations in this study. First, the samples used in this study are still relatively small, and the findings need to be further validated. Second, this is a cross-sectional study design and the longitudinal MDD study is needed to describe the developmental changes of LGI. Third, the correlation analyses were uncorrected for multiple comparisons due to limited samples.
In conclusion, the present study revealed the decreased LGI in left lingual gyrus and right posterior superior temporal sulcus and disrupted functional connectivities between left lingual gyrus and right lingual gyrus, anterior superior temporal gyrus, and dorsal precentral gyrus. The changed LGI and functional connectivities showed close associations with clinical performances. Our findings suggested that depression has a long-term effect on impaired visual cognitive functions, and the somatosensory symptoms may be an early biomarker for depression remission. Moreover, our findings indicated that posterior superior temporal sulcus may be mainly related social anxiety not emotion processing.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Ethics Committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
WK and HW designed the research. HW collected the data. JLo, JX, XW, JLi, and SR analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Z20191006).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the nurses for providing the help for patients' MRI data scanning.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
MathersCDLoncarD. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. (2006) 3:e442. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442
2.
KupferDJFrankEPhillipsML. Major depressive disorder: new clinical, neurobiological, and treatment perspectives. Lancet. (2012) 379:1045–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60602-8
3.
DrevetsWCPriceJLSimpsonJRJrToddRDReichTVannierMet al. Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders. Nature. (1997) 386:824–7. 10.1038/386824a0
4.
DrevetsWC. Neuroimaging and neuropathological studies of depression: implications for the cognitive-emotional features of mood disorders. Curr Opin Neurobiol. (2001) 11:240–9. 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00203-8
5.
BotteronKNRaichleMEDrevetsWCHeathACToddRD. Volumetric reduction in left subgenual prefrontal cortex in early onset depression. Biol Psychiatry. (2002) 51:342–4. 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01280-X
6.
AltshulerLBookheimerSProenzaMATownsendJSabbFFirestineAet al. Increased amygdala activation during mania: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Psychiatry. (2005) 162:1211–3. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1211
7.
WuHSunHXuJWuYWangCXiaoJet al. Changed hub and corresponding functional connectivity of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in major depressive disorder. Front Neuroanat. (2016) 10:120. 10.3389/fnana.2016.00120
8.
WangCWuHChenFXuJLiHLiHet al. Disrupted functional connectivity patterns of the insula subregions in drug-free major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. (2017) 234:297–304. 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.033
9.
WuHSunHWangCYuLLiYPengHet al. Abnormalities in the structural covariance of emotion regulation networks in major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. (2017) 84:237–42. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.001
10.
SunHLuoLYuanXZhangLHeYYaoSet al. Regional homogeneity and functional connectivity patterns in major depressive disorder, cognitive vulnerability to depression and healthy subjects. J Affect Disord. (2018) 235:229–35. 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.061
11.
WangLWeiQWangCXuJWangKTianYet al. Altered functional connectivity patterns of insular subregions in major depressive disorder after electroconvulsive therapy. Brain Imaging Behav. (2019) 14:753–61. 10.1007/s11682-018-0013-z
12.
WangLYuLWuFWuHWangJ. Altered whole brain functional connectivity pattern homogeneity in medication-free major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. (2019) 253:18–25. 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.040
13.
GarverDLNairTRChristensenJDHolcombJRambergJKingsburyS. Atrophic and static (neurodevelopmental) schizophrenic psychoses: premorbid functioning, symptoms and neuroleptic response. Neuropsychopharmacology. (1999) 21:82–92. 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00138-9
14.
AnsorgeMSHenRGingrichJA. Neurodevelopmental origins of depressive disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol. (2007) 7:8–17. 10.1016/j.coph.2006.11.006
15.
PetersonBSWangZHorgaGWarnerVRutherfordBKlahrKWet al. Discriminating risk and resilience endophenotypes from lifetime illness effects in familial major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. (2014) 71:136–48. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4048
16.
PengDShiFLiGFralickDShenTQiuMet al. Surface vulnerability of cerebral cortex to major depressive disorder. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0120704. 10.1371/journal.pone.0120704
17.
LiGNieJWangLShiFLinWGilmoreJHet al. Mapping region-specific longitudinal cortical surface expansion from birth to 2 years of age. Cereb Cortex. (2013) 23:2724–33. 10.1093/cercor/bhs265
18.
LiGWangLShiFLyallAELinWGilmoreJHet al. Mapping longitudinal development of local cortical gyrification in infants from birth to 2 years of age. J Neurosci. (2014) 34:4228–38. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3976-13.2014
19.
CasanovaMFTillquistCR. Encephalization, emergent properties, and psychiatry: a minicolumnar perspective. Neuroscientist. (2008) 14:101–18. 10.1177/1073858407309091
20.
PontiousAKowalczykTEnglundCHevnerRF. Role of intermediate progenitor cells in cerebral cortex development. Dev Neurosci. (2008) 30:24–32. 10.1159/000109848
21.
la FougereCGrantSKostikovASchirrmacherRGravelPSchipperHMet al. Where in-vivo imaging meets cytoarchitectonics: the relationship between cortical thickness and neuronal density measured with high-resolution [18F]flumazenil-PET. Neuroimage. (2011) 56:951–60. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.015
22.
PetanjekZJudasMKostovicIUylingsHB. Lifespan alterations of basal dendritic trees of pyramidal neurons in the human prefrontal cortex: a layer-specific pattern. Cereb Cortex. (2008) 18:915–29. 10.1093/cercor/bhm124
23.
PetanjekZJudasMSimicGRasinMRUylingsHBRakicPet al. Extraordinary neoteny of synaptic spines in the human prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2011) 108:13281–6. 10.1073/pnas.1105108108
24.
ZillesKPalomero-GallagherNAmuntsK. Development of cortical folding during evolution and ontogeny. Trends Neurosci. (2013) 36:275–84. 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.006
25.
ZhangYYuCZhouYLiKLiCJiangT. Decreased gyrification in major depressive disorder. Neuroreport. (2009) 20:378–80. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283249b34
26.
HanK-MWonEKangJKimAYoonH-KChangHSet al. Local gyrification index in patients with major depressive disorder and its association with tryptophan hydroxylase-2 (TPH2) polymorphism. Hum Brain Mapp. (2017) 38:1299–310. 10.1002/hbm.23455
27.
SchmitgenMMDeppingMSBachCWolfNDKuberaKMVasicNet al. Aberrant cortical neurodevelopment in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. (2019) 243:340–7. 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.021
28.
WilliamsJB. A structured interview guide for the Hamilton depression rating scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (1988) 45:742–7. 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007
29.
HamiltonM. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. (1959) 32:50–5. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x
30.
PowerJDBarnesKASnyderAZSchlaggarBLPetersenSE. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage. (2012) 59:2142–54. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018
31.
SchaerMCuadraMBTamaritLLazeyrasFEliezSThiranJP. A surface-based approach to quantify local cortical gyrification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2008) 27:161–70. 10.1109/TMI.2007.903576
32.
KellyPAVidingEWallaceGLSchaerMDe BritoSARobustelliBet al. Cortical thickness, surface area, and gyrification abnormalities in children exposed to maltreatment: neural markers of vulnerability?Biol Psychiatry. (2013) 74:845–52. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.06.020
33.
RichmanDPStewartRMHutchinsonJWCavinessVSJr. Mechanical model of brain convolutional development. Science. (1975) 189:18–21. 10.1126/science.1135626
34.
EssenDCV. A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature. (1997) 385:313–8. 10.1038/385313a0
35.
FujitaI. The inferior temporal cortex: architecture, computation, and representation. J Neurocytol. (2002) 31:359–71. 10.1023/A:1024138413082
36.
IshaiA. Let's face it: it's a cortical network. Neuroimage. (2008) 40:415–9. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.040
37.
CollinsJAOlsonIR. Beyond the FFA: The role of the ventral anterior temporal lobes in face processing. Neuropsychologia. (2014) 61:65–79. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.005
38.
WangJJiYLiXHeZWeiQBaiTet al. Improved and residual functional abnormalities in major depressive disorder after electroconvulsive therapy. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2020) 100:109888. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109888
39.
BeauchampMSNathARPasalarS. fMRI-Guided transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals that the superior temporal sulcus is a cortical locus of the McGurk effect. J Neurosci. (2010) 30:2414–7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4865-09.2010
40.
XiaoYFriedericiADMarguliesDSBrauerJ. Development of a selective left-hemispheric fronto-temporal network for processing syntactic complexity in language comprehension. Neuropsychologia. (2016) 83:274–82. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.003
41.
GrossmanEDBattelliLPascual-LeoneA. Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion. Vis Res. (2005) 45:2847–53. 10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.027
42.
EngellADHaxbyJV. Facial expression and gaze-direction in human superior temporal sulcus. Neuropsychologia. (2007) 45:3234–41. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.022
43.
FlackTRAndrewsTJHymersMAl-MosaiwiMMarsdenSPStrachanJWAet al. Responses in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus show a feature-based response to facial expression. Cortex. (2015) 69:14–23. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.002
44.
JackAMorrisJP. Neocerebellar contributions to social perception in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Dev Cogn Neurosci. (2014) 10:77–92. 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.001
45.
LeeSMGaoTMcCarthyG. Attributing intentions to random motion engages the posterior superior temporal sulcus. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. (2014) 9:81–7. 10.1093/scan/nss110
Summary
Keywords
major depressive disorder, resting-state, functional connectivity, fMRI, local gyrification index
Citation
Long J, Xu J, Wang X, Li J, Rao S, Wu H and Kuang W (2020) Altered Local Gyrification Index and Corresponding Functional Connectivity in Medication Free Major Depressive Disorder. Front. Psychiatry 11:585401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585401
Received
22 July 2020
Accepted
24 November 2020
Published
14 December 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Gianluca Serafini, San Martino Hospital (IRCCS), Italy
Reviewed by
Jiaojian Wang, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China; Yanghua Tian, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Long, Xu, Wang, Li, Rao, Wu and Kuang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Huawang Wu huawangwu@126.comWeihong Kuang kwhhlj@163.com
This article was submitted to Mood and Anxiety Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.