Impact Factor 2.483 | CiteScore 2
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Public Health, 08 December 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.585850

Patient Flow Dynamics in Hospital Systems During Times of COVID-19: Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Analysis

Sudhir Bhandari1, Amit Tak2*, Sanjay Singhal2, Jyotsna Shukla2, Ajit Singh Shaktawat1, Jitendra Gupta2, Bhoopendra Patel3, Shivankan Kakkar4, Amitabh Dube2, Sunita Dia5, Mahendra Dia6 and Todd C. Wehner6
  • 1Department of Medicine, S.M.S. Medical College & Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, India
  • 2Department of Physiology, S.M.S. Medical College & Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, India
  • 3Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Barmer, India
  • 4Department of Pharmacology, S.M.S. Medical College & Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, India
  • 5Department of Rheumatology, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States
  • 6Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States

Objectives: The present study is aimed at estimating patient flow dynamic parameters and requirement for hospital beds. Second, the effects of age and gender on parameters were evaluated.

Patients and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 987 COVID-19 patients were enrolled from SMS Medical College, Jaipur (Rajasthan, India). The survival analysis was carried out from February 29 through May 19, 2020, for two hazards: Hazard 1 was hospital discharge, and Hazard 2 was hospital death. The starting point for survival analysis of the two hazards was considered to be hospital admission. The survival curves were estimated and additional effects of age and gender were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

Results: The Kaplan Meier estimates of lengths of hospital stay (median = 10 days, IQR = 5–15 days) and median survival rate (more than 60 days due to a large amount of censored data) were obtained. The Cox model for Hazard 1 showed no significant effect of age and gender on duration of hospital stay. Similarly, the Cox model 2 showed no significant difference of age and gender on survival rate. The case fatality rate of 8.1%, recovery rate of 78.8%, mortality rate of 0.10 per 100 person-days, and hospital admission rate of 0.35 per 100,000 person-days were estimated.

Conclusion: The study estimates hospital bed requirements based on median length of hospital stay and hospital admission rate. Furthermore, the study concludes there are no effects of age and gender on average length of hospital stay and no effects of age and gender on survival time in above-60 age groups.

Key Messages

- Patient flow dynamic models are useful in management of the COVID-19 pandemic.

- Hospital data on admission and discharge can be used to estimate parameters of the model, such as hospital admission rates, recovery rates (inverse of median length of hospital stay).

- Real-time demand of hospital beds can be found based on estimated parameters.

- Evidence-based decision making is the best way to combat this pandemic.

- The intensity of public health measures implemented should be based on parameter values.

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization, on June 22, 2020, there were 8,860,331 confirmed cases and 465,7440 deaths due to COVID-19 (1). The dynamics and course of COVID-19 are uncertain, and it is not merely possible but likely that the patient load will overwhelm the medical infrastructure, including hospital beds and medical equipment. The emergence of a pandemic leads to extraordinary demands on the public health system. The number of hospital beds occupied is a function of median length of hospital stay and admission rate (2). The public health measures during the management of a disease pandemic should be aimed at increasing hospital bed capacity and decreasing admission rates as well as the length of the median hospital stay. Currently, no pharmaceutical interventions are safe and effective; however, best practices for disease management are based primarily on non-pharmaceutical measures, including a ban on public gatherings, compulsory home stays, closure of religious and educational institutions, closure of non-essential businesses, face mask ordinances, quarantine, and cordon sanitaire (that is, a defined quarantine area from which those inside are not allowed to leave) (3). A number of mathematical models have been proposed to estimate the hospital bed capacity during the pandemic (46). The estimation of parameters is required for further analysis by such models.

The present study is an effort to estimate the dynamic parameters of the COVID-19 pandemic, including median length of hospital stay, median survival time, mortality rate, recovery rate, hospital admission rate, and case fatality rate in a tertiary care hospital. Further comparison of survival data across gender and age groups was performed using Cox proportional hazard analysis. Against the background of given parameters, the outcomes of public health policymaking can be evaluated. The rationale of evidence-based decision making can be fulfilled.

Materials and Methods

In this hospital-based retrospective cohort study, 987 COVID-19 patients (confirmed with real-time RT-PCR) were enrolled from February 29 to May 19, 2020, from SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. Survival analysis was carried out to estimate median hospital stay and median survival time. The effects of age and gender on survival patterns were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Furthermore, case fatality, mortality, recovery, and hospital admission rates were also estimated. The duration of the study was 81 days.

Data Collection

The age, gender, and dates of hospital admission and discharge were recorded from case sheets of patients. The hospital outcome, i.e., recovered, died, or admitted, was also recorded. Hazard 1 was considered to be hospital discharge or death. Survival time 1 (ST1) was calculated from a starting point as the date of hospital admission and an end point as the date of hospital discharge or death (Hazard 1). The cases admitted on the last day of the study were still considered under censored observations (censoring 1). Similarly, Hazard 2 was considered to be death in the hospital of patients over 60 years of age. Survival time 2 (ST2) was calculated as the period between the date of hospital admission (as all patients tested RT-PCR positive were hospitalized) and date of death (Hazard 2). The cases that were still admitted or recovered were considered under censored observations (censoring 2).

Data Analysis

As the data was continuously observable, the survival analysis was done with the help of the Kaplan Meier (K-M) method. The survival rate was defined as a cumulative probability distribution function (cdf) of survival time (P[ST ≥ t], where t is time). Survival rates 1 (SR1) and 2 (SR2) for Hazards 1 and 2 were calculated.

In order to evaluate the effects of age and sex on survival patterns, two Cox proportional hazard models (Cox models 1 and 2) were fitted for Hazards 1 and 2, respectively. The covariates used in both models were age and gender. Before analyzing data in the Cox model, we checked to make sure censoring did not vary significantly for different values of covariates. The hazard ratios were calculated for both models (7).

The case fatality, mortality, recovery, and hospital admission rates were calculated as below (8):

Case fatality rate (%)= Total number of deathsTotal number of COVID-19 cases×100Recovery rate (%)= Total number of recovered Total number of COVID-19 cases×100Mortality rate (per 100 PD)= Total number of deathsTotal observed time (person-days)×100Hospital admission rate (per 105 PD)= Total admissionspopulation×days×105

For the estimation of hospital admission rate, the population of Jaipur was considered to be 3.47 million (9).

Statistical Analysis

The quantitative variables were expressed as median survival time and 95% confidence intervals with K-M based standard errors for the estimates of the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The statistical level of significance was considered at 5%. For the statistical analysis, we used JASP version 0.11 software and MATLAB 2016a (10, 11).

Results

The mean age of COVID-19 cases was 37.08 years (SD = 17.87). Men (62.11%) had a higher proportion of COVID-19 than women (37.89%). The distribution of age and gender indicated that younger men were most affected (Figure 1). The distribution of age and outcome showed a higher proportion of deaths in the elderly (Tables 1, 2).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Stacked bar plots showing distribution of age of COVID-19 cases along with distribution of gender (male and female) within each age group.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of age and sex along with comparison of age and gender across recovered and death cases in COVID-19 patients.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Association of mortality and various age groups in COVID-19 patients.

Survival Curves

The survival curve and K-M estimates for Hazard 1 were obtained (Figure 2, Supplemental Table 1). The median ST1 (median hospital stay) was 10 days.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Survival curve (red staircase plot) for Hazard 1 shows Kaplan Meier estimates for all age groups. The Cox model was based on the Weibull function curve (blue line plot).

The survival curve and K-M estimates for Hazard 2 were obtained (Figure 3, Supplementary Table 2). The median ST2 was more than 60 days because most of the data was censored.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Survival curve (red staircase plot) for Hazard 2 shows Kaplan Meier estimates for patients over 60 years of age. The Cox model was based on the Weibull function curve (blue line plot).

Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis

The censored and uncensored data for Hazard 1 did not differ significantly in mean age (t = 0.19, p = 0.85) and gender (χ2= 0.13, p = 0.71). Therefore, Cox model 1 was run with age and gender as covariates. Similarly, for Hazard 2, there was no significant difference found in mean age (t = 0.71, p = 0.48) and gender (χ2 = 0.26, p = 0.61). Therefore, Cox model 2 was also run with age and gender as a covariate.

The Cox Model 1 for SR1 showed no significant effect of age (HR = 1.00, p = 0.05) or gender (HR = 0.98, p = 0.88). Similarly, for SR2, the Cox model 2 showed no significant effects of age (HR = 1.01, p = 0.62) or gender (HR = 1.15, p = 0.69).

Estimated Rates

The case fatality rate was estimated to be 8.1% (95% CI: 6.4–9.8%). The estimation of recovery rate was 78.8% (95% CI: 76.2–81.3%). The mortality rate was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.08–0.12) per 100 person-days, and the hospital admission rate was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.33–0.37) per 100,000 person-days.

Discussion

The air we breathe, the food we eat, the house in which we live, the viruses to which we are exposed, the health services to which we have access, and the environment in which we live decide the outcome of a pandemic. The COVID-19 disease patterns are linked to migration, population movement, and disease diffusion (12). The main cause of varying rates of evolution of COVID-19 has resulted from different public health policies in various states (13). The primary objective for management of a pandemic is to keep the rate of evolution of cases lower such that the disease will not overwhelm the hospital bed capacity of any state. The aim of the management is to maintain the given inequality (2) (see Supplementary File for details):

Hospital capacity of the system median LOS ×HAR ×N 

where LOS is length of hospital stay, HAR is hospital admission rate (in 105 person-days) and N is the population (105 persons) dependent on the hospitals.

The present study estimated variables on the right side of the inequality. In order to maintain the inequality, hospital capacity should be increased or median hospital stay should be decreased or admission rate should be decreased. The hospital capacity of Jaipur was found to be 6,280, and the right side of the inequality was 108.5, which is less than hospital capacity (14). The rate of evolution for COVID-19 in Rajasthan was among the top eight states (15, 16).

As of now, no pharmaceutical agents are proven to be safe and effective for decreasing median hospital stay. The primary strategy is focused on non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) to decrease admission rates. Current control measures aim to reduce disease transmission through bans on public gatherings, compulsory home stays, closure of religious and educational institutions, closure of non-essential businesses, face mask ordinances, quarantine, and cordon sanitaire (that is, a defined quarantine area from which those inside are not allowed to leave) (3). Ravaghi et al. reviewed methods for determining optimum hospital capacity. The main factors were average length of hospital stay, admission rate, discharge rate, and target bed occupancy rate (2).

A number of mathematical models have been used in the prediction of hospital beds during the pandemic. Some are data-driven models as used by Manca et al. for the prediction of ICU beds (6). Others are empirical models, including SIR, SIRD, SEIR and SEIRD, and SIDARTHE (4). A number of models were proposed for estimating hospital bed capacity based on queuing theory. Patient demand for beds was modeled with Poisson distribution with rate λ. The service duration has an exponential distribution 1/μ (5). Further analysis of the model requires parameters like λ and μ. The present study estimates parameters for further analysis of such models.

One approach to decrease the median length of hospital stays is to triage patients based on requirement of specialized care with beds allotted accordingly. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published an algorithm to ensure appropriate admissions to the ICU for those most in need (17). In a study of the prediction of length of hospital stay with liver blood test results, liver condition (HBsAb positive, HBcAb positive, and fatty liver disease) was carried out. The median length of hospital stay was 6 days (18). Bhandari mentioned differential neutrophil count and random blood sugar as predictors of mortality risk of COVID-19 (19). One study reported that BMI, age, and CRP were all related to prolongation of length of hospital stay (20). Factors responsible for prolonged LOS in which the median was 11 days (IQR, 5–15 days) showed the most important were lower neutrophil counts, higher partial thrombin time (PT), lower D-Dimer associated with prolonged length of stay at hospital (21). A novel strategy to manage patients is to triage based on disease severity with management of mild patients in shelter homes. The shelter homes are large-scale, temporary hospitals, assembled rapidly by converting existing public places such as stadiums and exhibition centers into healthcare facilities. The important characteristics of shelter homes are rapid construction, large scale, and low cost. They serve functions of isolation, basic medical care, triage, frequent monitoring and referral, essential living, and social engagement (22).

Finally, the WHO Scientific and Technical Advisory Group for Infectious Hazards (STAG-IH) reviewed available information about COVID-19 and focused on closure monitoring of epidemiology, communication strategies, intensive source control, continued containment activities, intensified active surveillance, resilience of health systems, mitigation activities during community transmission, development of serological tests, and continued research (23).

Conclusion

The present study will help facilitate an evidence-based decision-making process for management of the COVID-19 pandemic. The estimation of dynamic parameters of patient flow in a hospital helps in hospital management. Further, the parameters can be used by various mathematical models to predict future requirements.

Limitations of the Study

The study includes only age and gender as covariates to run the model. The clinical covariates, such as severity, symptoms, and CT scores may provide more precise information about survival time and length of hospital stay.

Data Availability Statement

The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: Data is available on reasonable request to corresponding author. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to Amit Tak, dramittak@gmail.com.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee, SMS Medical College, Jaipur (Letter No. 524/MC/EC/2020 dated 7 July 2020). Written informed consent for participation was not provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin because: Ethics Committee said, as per the National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research involving Human Participants by Indian Council of Medical Research, 2017 (section 5: Informed Consent Process- Box 5.2, Page No 53 and 54), the study being retrospective where participants have been deidentified, the waiver of informed consent is hereby granted.

Author Contributions

SB, AD, and JS provided administrative support, AT, SD, MD, and TW did concept, design, and data analysis and interpretation. AS helped in provision of patients. SK helped in collection and assembly of data. BP, SS, and JG helped in manuscript writing. All authors commented and finally approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The contributors to the article acknowledge the invaluable inputs of the departments of medicine and microbiology of SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, and the Government of Rajasthan for their ongoing support against the menace of the global pandemic of COVID-19.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.585850/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

cdf, cumulative probability distribution function; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease-19; K-M, Kaplan Meier; HR, hazard ratio; p, p-value; SARS CoV-2, severe acute respiratory corona virus 2; SR1, survival rate 1; SR2, survival rate 2; ST1, survival time 1; ST2, survival time 2.

References

1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease- 2019. (2020). Availabe online at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed June 18, 2020).

Google Scholar

2. Ravaghi H, Alidoost S, Mannion R, Bélorgeot VD. Models and methods for determining the optimal number of beds in hospitals and regions: a systematic scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. (2020) 20:186. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5023-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hartley DM, Perencevich EN. Public health interventions for COVID-19. JAMA. (2020) 323:1908. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Giordano G, Blanchini F, Bruno R, Colaneri P, Di Filippo A, Di Matteo A, et al. Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy. Nat Med. (2020) 26:855–60. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0883-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Green LV. How many hospital beds? INQUIRY. (2002) 39:400–12. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.4.400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Manca D, Caldiroli D, Storti E. A simplified math approach to predict ICU beds and mortality rate for hospital emergency planning under Covid-19 pandemic. Comput Chem Eng. (2020) 140:106945. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Indrayan A, Malhotra RK. Medical Biostatistics. in Survival Analysis. 4th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group (2018). p. 513–23.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. [The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. (2020). 41:145–51. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Jaipur Rajasthan Official. Population. (2020). Available online at: https://jaipur.rajasthan.gov.in/content/raj/jaipur/en/about-jaipur/population.html# (accessed June 25, 2020).

Google Scholar

10. JASP Team. JASP version 0.12.2 [Computer software]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Copyright 2013-2019

Google Scholar

11. MATLAB Team. Statistics Machine Learning Toolbox 10.2, Classification Learner App. MATLAB. version 9.0.0.341360 (R 2016a). Natick, MA: The Mathworks Inc. (2016).

Google Scholar

12. Dummer TJB. Health geography: supporting public health policy and planning. Canad Med Assoc J. (2008) 178:1177–80. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071783

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Bhandari S, Shaktawat AS, Tak A, Patel B, Gupta K, Gupta J, et al. A multistate ecological study comparing evolution of cumulative cases (trends) in top eight COVID-19 hit Indian states with regression modeling. Int J Acad Med. (2020) 6:91–5. doi: 10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_60_20

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Government of Rajasthan. Department of Medical, Health and Family Welfare. (2020). Available online at: http://www.rajswasthya.nic.in/PDF/COvid%20Facility%20Rajasthan.pdf (accessed June 23, 2020).

Google Scholar

15. Bhandari S, Sharma R, Singh Shaktawat A, Banerjee S, Patel B, Tak A, et al. COVID-19 related mortality profile at a tertiary care centre: a descriptive study. Scr Med. (2020) 51:69–73. doi: 10.5937/scriptamed51-27126

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kakkar S, Bhandari S, Shaktawat A, Sharma R, Dube A, Banerjee S, et al. A preliminary clinico-epidemiological portrayal of COVID-19 pandemic at a premier medical institution of North India. Ann Thoracic Med. (2020) 15:146. doi: 10.4103/atm.ATM_182_20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Nicola M, O'Neill N, Sohrabi C, Khan M, Agha M, Agha R. Evidence based management guideline for the COVID-19 pandemic - Review article. Int J Surg. (2020) 77:206–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Gu X, Li X, An X, Yang S, Wu S, Yang X, et al. Elevated serum aspartate aminotransferase level identifies patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and predicts the length of hospital stay. J Clin Lab Anal. (2020) 34:e23391. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Bhandari S, Shaktawat AS, Tak A, Patel B, Shukla J, Singhal S, et al. Logistic regression analysis to predict mortality risk in COVID-19 patients from routine hematologic parameters. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci. (2020) 12:123–9. doi: 10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_58_20

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Moriconi D, Masi S, Rebelos E, Virdis A, Manca ML, De Marco S, et al. Obesity prolongs the hospital stay in patients affected by COVID-19, and may impact on SARS-COV-2 shedding. Obesity Res Clin Pract. (2020) 14:205–9. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2020.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hong Y, Wu X, Qu J, Gao Y, Chen H, Zhang Z. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and development of a prediction model for prolonged hospital length of stay. Annal Trans Med. (2020) 8:443. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Chen S, Zhang Z, Yang J, Wang J, Zhai X, Bärnighausen T, et al. Fangcang shelter hospitals: a novel concept for responding to public health emergencies. Lancet. (2020) 395:1305–14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30744-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Heymann DL, Shindo N. COVID-19: what is next for public health? Lancet. (2020) 395:542–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30374-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: COVID-19, cox proportion hazards models, evidence based decision making, hospital beds, public health, hospital management

Citation: Bhandari S, Tak A, Singhal S, Shukla J, Shaktawat AS, Gupta J, Patel B, Kakkar S, Dube A, Dia S, Dia M and Wehner TC (2020) Patient Flow Dynamics in Hospital Systems During Times of COVID-19: Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Analysis. Front. Public Health 8:585850. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.585850

Received: 21 July 2020; Accepted: 02 November 2020;
Published: 08 December 2020.

Edited by:

Magdalena Klimczuk-Kochańska, University of Warsaw, Poland

Reviewed by:

Indika Varuna Mallawaarachchi, University of Virginia, United States
Jidapa Kraisangka, Mahidol University, Thailand

Copyright © 2020 Bhandari, Tak, Singhal, Shukla, Shaktawat, Gupta, Patel, Kakkar, Dube, Dia, Dia and Wehner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Amit Tak, dramittak@gmail.com