SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Sec. Public Mental Health
Meditation: Evidence Map of Systematic Reviews
- 1Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health, São Paulo, Brazil
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 3Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil
- 4Preventive Medicine Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 5Brain Institute, Albert Einstein Israelite Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
Study Basis: This evidence map presents a summary of studies that addressed the effects of meditation on various clinical and health conditions. Meditation is a contemplative practice that has been used for the promotion of health, and the treatment of different conditions.
Method: The study is based on the search of four electronic databases for the period 1994-November 2019 and includes systematic reviews, meta-analyses, meta-syntheses, and integrative reviews. 3iE evidence gap map was the methodology of choice, and AMSTAR 2 was used for the analyses. Tableau was used to graphically display the confidence level, number of reviews, health outcomes, and intervention effects.
Results: This map encompasses 191 studies, with Mindfulness being the key word that retrieved the highest number of results. Several meditation techniques were evaluated in different contexts, and the confidence levels of 22 studies were high, 84 were moderate, and 82 were low. Two 2 meta-syntheses and 1 integrative review were also included. Most of the studies reported positive effects and a beneficial potential of the practice of meditation. Health outcomes were divided into five groups out of which mental health and vitality, and well-being and quality of life stood out with the largest number of studies.
Conclusions: Meditation has been applied in different areas. This Evidence Map intends to be an easy visual tool to access valuable evidence-based information on this complementary therapy for patients, health professionals, and managers.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has encouraged and strengthened the inclusion, recognition, and use of Integrative and Complementary Health Practices (ICPs) in national health systems at all levels: Primary Care, Specialized Care, and Hospital Care, through the recommendations of the WHO Strategy on Traditional Medicine 2014–2023 (1).
Since 2018, meditation is one of the 29 practices that have been included in the Brazilian Unified Health System (2). Meditation is a contemplative practice, related to the development of human experiences and widely used in different traditions. It originated centuries ago and is currently studied for its effects on health. Meditation is a generic term that many practices fit into. Therefore, some authors propose a general definition of meditation. Cardoso et al. (3) define it as: “Meditation is a procedure which should encompass a specific technique, clearly defined, involving muscle relaxation in some point of the process and “logic relaxation”; it is a self-induced state, using a self-focus skill (coined “anchor”). Within the various schools of meditation, Mindfulness has a prominent place due to the considerable number of works found on this map. Some authors define Mindfulness as: “paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, non-judgmentally” (4) or “mindfulness meditation involves the self-regulation of attention and involves adopting a particular orientation toward one's experiences in the present moment” (5). Given the considerable number of meditation schools, we chose to add studies that self-identified as meditation.
Due to the recent expansion of the National Policy for Integrative and Complementary Practices (PNPIC), the Brazilian Ministry of Health has signed a partnership with the Latin American and Caribbean Center for Health Sciences Information (BIREME-PAHO-WHO) and the Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health (CABSIN) to develop Evidence Maps on Integrative and Traditional Health Practices (6), including this one on meditation. The objective of this Evidence Map is to concisely describe different meditation interventions and their related health outcomes.
According to Johnson (7), meditation is a practice that may have arisen simultaneously with the domestication of fire. The author explains that the first meditative experiences may have taken place while our ancestors contemplated the fire flames. In the past, meditation was considered a practice within the spiritual realm; however, the recent increase in the number of practitioners may derive from its positive effects on health (8, 9).
The first robust evidence in the health field can be found in the late 60's. In 1970 (10), Wallace used EEG and other physiological measures to monitor the meditative state. The results of this study pointed to the surge of theta waves, a frequency decrease, and an increase in the amplitude of the alpha waves. Thus, the author characterized meditation as a hypo metabolic state with a predominant expression of the parasympathetic nervous system and a reduction of the sympathetic tonus.
Since then, the number and quality of studies on meditation has increased, becoming an integrative practice that has gained a growing interest among health professionals.
About 19% of the non-institutionalized adult population in the USA practices some kind of meditation (11). A higher rate of adoption has been observed among women, and the more educated and younger population, and people with chronic diseases as anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep problems. The high cost of conventional medical treatment is also one of the reasons for the adoption of this practice. The most vulnerable population, with worse health conditions, is less likely to practice meditation (12).
The interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, classified by WHO within a broader scope as Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicines (MTCI), has grown not only within the general population, but also among health professionals. In general, about 80% of complementary therapies have been considered as an option of treatment during the patient-doctor discussions (13). Despite the moderate level of knowledge that doctors have about meditation, they find it beneficial and prescribe it as a form of treatment (14). This acceptance of the meditation practice may derive from the increasing number of courses on MTCI offered as part of the medical curriculum; however, little scientific evidence is offered on this regard (15).
To bridge this gap, this study intends to systematize research results on the prescription and adoption of meditation in a clear and concise map to boost confidence and inform decisions taken by health professionals and public administrators.
This Evidence Map includes integrative and systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and meta-synthesis, and summarizes meditation related health interventions and outcomes. Systematic reviews were performed to obtain a reliable summary of the best evidence available in this area. The analysis was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines (16) and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3iE) Evidence Gap Map methodology (17). An advisory panel of librarians, practitioners, policy makers, content experts, and researchers contributed to the production of this evidence map.
Papers published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese were selected in searches conducted on PUBMED, BVS, and EMBASE databases from 1994 to November 2019. Experts on the topic were consulted and the search strategy was jointly developed with BIREME.
List of the words used in the search in Table 1 terms searched for the meditation evidence map.
Systematic reviews/meta-analysis, and meta-syntheses on meditation with adequate description of health outcomes were eligible for inclusion in the Evidence Map. An integrative review study was considered as highly relevant and was also included. The selection of systematic reviews, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, and integrative reviews was done based on the studies that self-identified as such. Participants of all ages, regardless of their health condition, were also eligible for inclusion as well as interventions of any kind, follow-up, and duration. Studies that did not focus on meditation and/or related health outcomes were excluded.
Screening and blinding procedures were carried out by two independent reviewers using Rayyan software (18). Citations deemed as potentially relevant by at least one reviewer and unclear citations were verified in their full text. Full-text publications were selected according to the inclusion criteria agreed by the two independent reviewers; disagreements were resolved by discussion (Figure 1). AMSTAR 2 (19) (Figure 2) was used to analyze the quality and methodological rigor of the studies included.
Synthesis of the Data
A spreadsheet with various descriptors was developed to synthesize the findings. This matrix included: Full text citation; Interventions; Outcomes group; Outcomes; Effect; Population; Database ID; Country of focus; Country of publication; Year of publication; Type of review; Review design; Study design; Confidence level. The Evidence Map was organized considering the outcomes, effects, and confidence level of the studies included.
Of 407 citations identified, 191 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 507 different outcomes were identified, with it being possible to find more than one per study, i.e., a single article may have information related to two outcome groups, several types of meditation, and different populations. One hundred and ten systematic reviews with meta-analysis, 78 systematic reviews, two meta-syntheses, and one integrative review were included. Meditation types based on open state practices accounted for the highest number of results (390 results), followed by mixture of techniques (93 results), mantra-focused practices (15 results), state-focused practices (8 results), and focused mindfulness practices (1 result). According to AMSTAR2 classification, most studies showed a moderate level of confidence (n = 84 studies), 82 studies had a low confidence level, and 22 studies had a high confidence level. The two meta-syntheses and the integrative review could not be evaluated by this tool (19).
Most of the studies found in the search addressed outcomes in the adult population with some diagnosed conditions, with 114 on patients with mental disorders, 45 on patients with cancer, and 36 on patients with chronic pain. The search also identified 36 studies conducted exclusively with children or adolescents, and 35 that only included women.
The United States was the country of focus where the highest number of studies were carried out (61 studies), followed by Canada (30 studies), United Kingdom (28 studies), and Australia (23 studies). One hundred and twenty one studies did not report the country of focus.
Outcomes and Effects
It was observed that meditation has been used as an intervention in diverse health conditions. Within the 191 studies retrieved, effects were classified into five categories of health outcomes and considered as: negative (no results); positive (246 results); potentially positive (174 results); inconclusive/mixed (74 results); and no effect (13 results), reaching a total of 507 diverse effects, as shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 depicts the results, which are divided into five major groups.
The Mental Health category included 270 results involving the practice of meditation (Figure 5) among which 138 reported positive effects, 88 reported potentially positive effects, 38 reported inconclusive/mixed effects, and 6 did not describe the effects. The highest number of results was found in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and stress, followed by those pointing out the improvement in levels of mindfulness (Figure 5). Regarding the population, in 97 results the inclusion criterion was patients with some diagnosis of mental disorder, 24 results referred to the effect of meditation practices exclusively in children and adolescents, and in 20 results the inclusion criterion was cancer patients. Results whose inclusion criterion was exclusively women had 18 occurrences. Open State practices were the most prevalent, represented in the treatment of 34 different categories among which Mindfulness-Based Interventions were the most common, followed by Mixed Techniques, adopted in 16 categories, mantra-focused practices, adopted in six categories and focused attention adopted for the treatment of four different categories.
Physical and Metabolic Effects
The group including Physical and Metabolic outcomes presents a total of 87 results. The effect of meditation was positive in 41 results, potentially positive in 29 results, inconclusive in 15 results, and with no effects in two results. The most common outcomes were improvements regarding high blood pressure, general cancer symptoms, and chronic pain (Figure 6). Regarding the population, the inclusion criteria for cancer patients showed effects in 16 outcome categories, cardiovascular/vascular disease 15, and chronic pain 14. Mindfulness-Based Interventions were applied in 20 categories, Mix of Techniques in 11, and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in 14 outcome categories. Most of the studies in this group were classified as having a moderate level of confidence.
Vitality, Well-Being, and Quality of Life
The vitality, well-being and quality of life group obtained 106 results for the practice of meditation as can be seen in Figure 7, out of which 47 were positive, 37 potentially positive, 20 inconclusive and two results with no effects. The most common outcomes were decreasing stress, higher quality of life and better worker health with 39, 24, and 4 results, respectively. Most of the results obtained in this group (62 results) included a population with some health disorder diagnosed, plus 11 results were obtained using the criteria of workers.
The number of meditation practitioners has grown in recent years. One of the main reasons is the acknowledgment of the positive effects that meditation exerts on health in general (8, 9). However, healthcare courses themselves offer few disciplines and little scientific evidence on the MTCI (15, 20), that is why studies of this nature are necessary, such as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and evidence mapping.
A survey carried out by Andrade et al. (21), found out that ~30% of the population in a large city like São Paulo suffer some sort of mental disorder, the most prevalent being depression and anxiety. Our survey mostly researched population with some mental disorder. The high prevalence of psychiatric disorders around the world is one of the reasons why a large number of studies on meditation were carried out within the Mental Health outcome group. Within a US sample, anxiety, stress, and depression were the health issues most associated with the search for meditation. Most respondents recognized that meditation improves mental health (22).
In the map, depression, and anxiety were the disorders with the highest number of results, with 71 and 67 results, respectively. On depression, there were 11 reviews with a high confidence level of which only one effect was inconclusive, one potential positive and 9 had positive effects related to meditation. All articles with a high confidence level were systematic review studies with meta-analysis (23, 24) reporting positive effects for reducing depressive symptoms in patients with mental disorders.
Goldberg et al. (24) also conclude that meditation has similar results to some standard treatments such as psychotherapy. Another study showed that a meditation program reduced relapse in patients with depression (25), that is, since recurrent depression is more difficult to be treated and causes high costs for society (26, 27), the MBCT program can be considered an efficient treatment, as observed in NHS experiences in England (28) and confirmed by several studies present in this map (29–31).
Mental health costs in China increased more than 3-fold from 2005 to 2013 and could have reached much higher values if all patients with mental illness received adequate professional treatment. Anxiety is the most prevalent mental disorder, affecting up to a third of the population at some point in life (21, 32, 33) with a high economic and social impact (34). Of all the studies included in this map, most have addressed anxiety. Of the 67 results for Anxiety Disorders, the vast majority, 56 results, were positive or potentially positive, that is, meditation can be used as one of the forms of integrative and complementary treatment for anxiety disorders, as shown in Montero-Marin et al. (35). In other studies, anxiety was assessed in patients with other comorbidities, such as cancer (36–39). The prevalence of anxiety in cancer patients is high (40, 41) and meditation can help patients to reduce anxiety symptoms as stated in the meta-analysis carried out by Zhang et al. (42) which included RCT studies of patients diagnosed with cancer.
In the dimension of health promotion and vitality, 7 moderate quality reviews highlight relevant effects on quality of life (37, 39, 43–48) obtained through Mindfulness interventions. These practices can even be done online (49). The fact that meditation is a potentially self-applicable practice that can be taught from a distance is especially important in periods of social isolation such as the one imposed by the covid-19 (50) pandemic.
The use of meditation as a health promotion resource is growing, with positive outcomes in terms of cognitive performance (51–53) and sexual performance (54), for example. Also noteworthy is the development of mindfulness skills (39, 48, 55–57), compassion (58), empathy (58), and positive emotions (59).
Integrative resources have been increasingly used in the context of health promotion (60). Sarris et al. emphasize the importance of incorporating practices that support lifestyle change based on scientific evidence to support health protocols and policies (60).
Along the same lines, other authors propose broad intervention programs involving lifestyle changes based on meditation (61). Thus, the interdependence between psychological, physical, and human development factors for an approach involving meditation has become relevant (62).
Among the interventions of the Complementary and Integrative Traditional Medicines (MTCI), meditation is the most comprehensive in terms of results and variety of effects. Among the systematic review studies included in the evidence maps presented in the BVS/MTCI, the meditation map is the largest of them, indirectly showing the substantial number of studies published on the subject in recent decades. Meditation techniques can be used by children and adolescents (63), pregnant women (64), the elderly (65), health professionals, and caregivers (66, 67), in addition to people with chronic diseases (68), having a great potential from the point of view of public health, given its impact on physical and metabolic health conditions (63). In cancer patients, it is possible to highlight the increase in variables such as physical well-being (69, 70) and psychological well-being through meditation.
On the physical and metabolic effects of meditation, the literature has described several relevant factors. The ability to promote neural plasticity of meditation techniques is very relevant and has important physical and metabolic impacts (71). Black and Slavich describe possible effects of meditation to improve the immune system (72). The literature also speaks of inflammatory and metabolic markers (73) that are altered with meditative practice.
In this perspective, perhaps interventions such as meditation are part of a plausible solution to deal with the challenges related to quaternary prevention in collective health (74, 75) mainly due to the need to deal with chronic diseases in a preventive and comprehensive approach, considering lifestyle changes in addition to symptom-focused attention.
The creation and publication of evidence maps consists of graphically representing the best evidence found, analyzed and categorized, with the corresponding bibliographic records and full texts (when available) of the studies, in order to facilitate access to information for all interested parties (50).
As it is not the objective of an evidence map, the calculation of the effect sizes of a meta-analysis was not performed, nor was the risk of bias assessments performed, but we tried to overcome these limitations by assessing the quality of the included systematic reviews by applying AMSTAR 2.
The outcomes and effects information presented in this Meditation Evidence Map will further advance the evidence-based knowledge of MTCI as proposed by PNPIC in Brazil and promoted by WHO 2014–2024 and BIREME.
Meditation practices can be developed by healthy individuals or individuals who have different health conditions, from chronic diseases to different mental health disorders, with positive and potentially positive effects on various low-risk health outcomes.
The practice of meditation can be a safe and effective strategy for implementing programs in the field of collective health. The possibility of applying it in groups facilitates access and reduces costs in relation to drug interventions, for example in mild cases of depression and anxiety, being a potential resource to avoid chronicity and the negative impact of stress on health.
Data Availability Statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://mtci.bvsalud.org/pt/mapas-de-evidencia-2/.
CS and RA did the selection of articles and quality assessment, analysis of results, and writing of the discussion. VA designed the search strategies and accompanied the filtering of results by reviewers on the RAYYAN platform, collaborated in the data analysis, methodological design of the evidence maps, and writing of the manuscript. MS and RG collaborated in the methodological design of the evidence maps, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript and conclusions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
The study was part of a project funded by the Ministry of Health of Brazil in partnership with the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information BIREME-PAHO-WHO and the Brazilian Academic Consortium of Integrative Health to develop Evidence Maps in Integrative and Complementary Practices, including meditation. The Brazilian Ministry of Health funded the project and BIREME's research partners conducted the study and performed the collection; management; analysis; interpretation of data; preparation, review, and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
The results and conclusions of this publication are the responsibility of the authors responsible for its content; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Health of Brazil and BIREME-PAHO-WHO.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Ministry of Health, Brazil, and BIREME-PAHO-WHO for funding this research and to the project's technical expert advisory panel for their support. Any errors in facts or interpretation in this manuscript are the responsibility of the authors.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.742715/full#supplementary-material
1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Estrategia de la OMS sobre medicina tradicional 2014–2023. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Organización Mundial de la Salud Ginebra (2013). p. 72. Available online at: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s21201es/s21201es.pdf
6. CABSIN. Mapas de Evidência|BVS MTCI (2020). Available online at: https://mtci.bvsalud.org/pt/mapas-de-evidencia-2/ (accessed: Sep 22, 2020).
9. Okoro CA, Zhao G, Li C, Balluz LS. Has the use of complementary and alternative medicine therapies by U.S. adults with chronic disease-related functional limitations changed from 2002 to 2007? J Altern Complement Med. (2013) 19:217–23. doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.0009
11. Olano HA, Kachan D, Tannenbaum SL, Mehta A, Annane D, Lee DJ. Engagement in mindfulness practices by US adults: sociodemographic barriers. J Altern Complement Med. (2015) 21:100–2. doi: 10.1089/acm.2014.0269
15. Brokaw JJ, Tunnicliff G, Raess BU, Saxon DW. The teaching of complementary and alternative medicine in US medical schools: a survey of course directors. Acad Med. (2002) 77:876–81. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00013
16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. (2009) 62:1006–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
17. Snilstveit B, Vojtkova M, Bhavsar A, Stevenson J, Gaarder M. Evidence & gap maps: a tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. J Clin Epidemiol. (2016) 79:120–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.015
19. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. (2017) 358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008
20. Nascimento MC. do, Romano VF, Chazan ACS, Quaresma CH. Formação em práticas integrativas e complementares em saúde: desafios para as universidades públicas Trab Educ e Saúde. (2018) 16:751–72. doi: 10.1590/1981-7746-sol00130
21. Andrade LH, Wang Y-P, Andreoni S, Silveira CM, Alexandrino-Silva C, Siu ER, et al. Mental disorders in megacities: findings from the São Paulo megacity mental health survey, Brazil. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e31879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031879
22. Cramer H, Hall H, Leach M, Frawley J, Zhang Y, Leung B, et al. Prevalence, patterns, and predictors of meditation use among US adults: a nationally representative survey. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:36760. doi: 10.1038/srep36760
23. Klainin-Yobas P, Cho MAA, Creedy D. Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions on depressive symptoms among people with mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. (2012) 49:109–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.08.014
24. Goldberg SB, Tucker RP, Greene PA, Davidson RJ, Wampold BE, Kearney DJ, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. (2018) 59:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.011
25. Kuyken W, Warren FC, Taylor RS, Whalley B, Crane C, Bondolfi G, et al. Efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in prevention of depressive relapse an individual patient data meta-analysis from randomized trials. JAMA Psychiatry. (2016) 73:565–74. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0076
29. Parsons CE, Crane C, Parsons LJ, Fjorback LO, Kuyken W. Home practice in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of participants' mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes. Behav Res Ther. (2017) 95:29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.004
30. Piet J, Hougaard E. The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for prevention of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. (2011) 31:1032–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.05.002
31. Galante J, Iribarren SJ, Pearce PF. Effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Res Nurs. (2013) 18:133–55. doi: 10.1177/1744987112466087
33. Huang Y, Wang Y, Wang H, Liu Z, Yu X, Yan J, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Psychiatry. (2019) 6:211–24. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30511-X
35. Montero-Marin J, Garcia-Campayo J, Pérez-Yus MC, Zabaleta-Del-Olmo E, Cuijpers P. Meditation techniques vs. relaxation therapies when treating anxiety: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Med. (2019) 49:2118–33. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001600
36. Zimmermann FF, Burrell B, Jordan J. The acceptability and potential benefits of mindfulness-based interventions in improving psychological well-being for adults with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. (2018) 30:68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.12.014
39. Zhang Q, Zhao H, Zheng Y. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on symptom variables and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. (2019) 27:771–81. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4570-x
41. Wilson KG, Chochinov HM, Skirko MG, Allard P, Chary S, Gagnon PR, et al. Depression and anxiety disorders in palliative cancer care. J Pain Symptom Manage. (2007) 33:118–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.07.016
42. Zhang MF, Wen YS, Liu WY, Peng LF, Wu XD, Liu QW. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based therapy for reducing anxiety and depression in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine. (2015) 94:e897–0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000897
43. Veehof MM, Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, Schreurs KMG. Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. (2016) 45:5–31. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1098724
44. Khoury B, Knäuper B, Schlosser M, Carrière K, Chiesa A. Effectiveness of traditional meditation retreats: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. (2017) 92:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.11.006
45. Jaffray L, Bridgman H, Stephens M, Skinner T. Evaluating the effects of mindfulness-based interventions for informal palliative caregivers: a systematic literature review. Palliat Med. (2016) 30:117–31. doi: 10.1177/0269216315600331
46. Lakhan SE, Schofield KL. Mindfulness-based therapies in the treatment of somatization disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e71834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071834
47. Mindfulness-based interventions in clinical samples of youth with internalizing disorders systematic review. Can Fam Physician. (2018) 64:S79. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L625666292
48. Sevilla-Llewellyn-Jones J, Santesteban-Echarri O, Pryor I, McGorry P, Alvarez-Jimenez M. Web-based mindfulness interventions for mental health treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Ment Health. (2018) 20:e10278. doi: 10.2196/10278
49. Spijkerman MP, Pots WT, Bohlmeijer ET. Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: a review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev. (2016) 45:102–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009
50. Portella CFS, Ghelman R, Abdala CVM, Schveitzer MC. Evidence map on the contributions of traditional, complementary and integrative medicines for health care in times of COVID-19. Integr Med Res. (2020) 9:100473. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100473
51. Yang Y, Liu YH, Zhang HF, Liu JY. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapies on people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Sci. (2015) 2:283–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.07.003
52. Chan JSY, Deng K, Wu J, Yan JH, Heyn PC. Effects of meditation and mind-body exercises on older adults' cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Gerontologist. (2019) 59:E782–90. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz022
53. Burgdorf V, Szabó M, Abbott MJ. The effect of mindfulness interventions for parents on parenting stress and youth psychological outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:1336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01336
56. Ruiz-Fernández MD, Ortíz-Amo R, Ortega-Galán ÁM, Ibáñez-Masero O, Rodríguez-Salvador MDM, Ramos-Pichardo JD. Mindfulness therapies on health professionals. Int J Ment Health Nurs. (2020) 29:127–40. doi: 10.1111/inm.12652
57. McConville J, McAleer R, Hahne A. Mindfulness training for health profession students—the effect of mindfulness training on psychological well-being, learning and clinical performance of health professional students: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Explor J Sci Heal. (2017) 13:26–45. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2016.10.002
58. Luberto CM, Shinday N, Song R, Philpotts LL, Park ER, Fricchione GL, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of meditation on empathy, compassion, and prosocial behaviors. Mindfulness. (2018) 9:708–24. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0841-8
59. Galante J, Galante I, Bekkers MJ, Gallacher J. Effect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. (2014) 82:1101–14. doi: 10.1037/a0037249
60. Sarris J, Glick R, Hoenders R, Duffy J, Lake J. Integrative mental healthcare white paper: establishing a new paradigm through research, education, and clinical guidelines. Adv Integr Med. (2014) 1:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.aimed.2012.12.002
61. Bringmann HC, Bringmann N, Jeitler M, Brunnhuber S, Michalsen A, Sedlmeier P. Meditation-based lifestyle modification: development of an integrative mind-body program for mental health and human flourishing. Complement Med Res. (2020) 28:252–62. doi: 10.1159/000512333
62. Gimpel C, Von Scheidt C, Jose G, Sonntag U, Stefano GB, Michalsen A, et al. Changes and interactions of flourishing, mindfulness, sense of coherence, and quality of life in patients of a mind-body medicine outpatient clinic. Complement Med Res. (2014) 21:154–62. doi: 10.1159/000363784
63. Abbott RA, Whear R, Rodgers LR, Bethel A, Thompson Coon J, Kuyken W, et al. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness based cognitive therapy in vascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Psychosom Res. (2014) 76:341–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.02.012
64. Shi Z, MacBeth A. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on maternal perinatal mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Mindfulness. (2017) 8:823–47. doi: 10.1007/s12671-016-0673-y
65. Barnes V, Orme-Johnson D. Clinical and pre-clinical applications of the transcendental meditation program in the prevention and treatment of essential hypertension and cardiovascular disease in youth and adults. Curr Hypertens Rev. (2006) 2:207–18. doi: 10.2174/157340206778132545
66. Dharmawardene M, Givens J, Wachholtz A, Makowski S, Tjia J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of meditative interventions for informal caregivers and health professionals. BMJ Support Palliat Care. (2016) 6:160–9. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000819
67. Braun SE, Kinser PA, Rybarczyk B. Can mindfulness in health care professionals improve patient care? An integrative review and proposed model. Transl Behav Med. (2019) 9:187–201. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby059
68. Bawa FL, Mercer SW, Atherton RJ, Clague F, Keen A, Scott NW, et al. Does mindfulness improve outcomes in patients with chronic pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. (2015) 65:e387–400. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685297
69. Zhang J, Xu R, Wang B, Wang J. Effects of mindfulness-based therapy for patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. (2016) 26:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.02.012
73. Pascoe MC, Thompson DR, Jenkins ZM, Ski CF. Mindfulness mediates the physiological markers of stress: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. (2017) 95:156–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.004
74. Martins C, Godycki-Cwirko M, Heleno B, Brodersen J. Quaternary prevention: reviewing the concept: quaternary prevention aims to protect patients from medical harm. Eur J Gen Pract. (2018) 24:106–11. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1422177
Keywords: meditation, evidence map, systematic review, complementary and alternative medicine, mindfulness
Citation: Schlechta Portella CF, Ghelman R, Abdala V, Schveitzer MC and Afonso RF (2021) Meditation: Evidence Map of Systematic Reviews. Front. Public Health 9:742715. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.742715
Received: 16 July 2021; Accepted: 22 October 2021;
Published: 02 December 2021.
Edited by:Rahul Shidhaye, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Reviewed by:Betsy Wisner, Our Lady of the Lake University, United States
Christopher A. Was, Kent State University, United States
Copyright © 2021 Schlechta Portella, Ghelman, Abdala, Schveitzer and Afonso. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.