Associations of Dietary Patterns and Incident Type 2 Diabetes in a Community Population Cohort From Southwest China

Abstract

Background:

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is rising rapidly worldwide, but there are scant empirical data on the association between diet and diabetes in Southwest China.

Methods:

In this prospective community-population cohort study from Guizhou Province, China since 2010, 7,023 eligible adults were included. Dietary information was obtained by face-to-face interviews with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, and dietary patterns were derived by factor analysis. The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for the associations between various dietary patterns and incident T2D risk by cox proportional hazard model.

Results:

Until 2020, a total of 749 new T2D cases were identified during the average follow-up of 7.05 years and the incidence was 14.75/1,000 person-years. Two main dietary patterns from the food frequency questionnaire were identified by factor analysis, i.e., vegetable-grain pattern and junk food pattern. In the multivariate analysis, 28 and 20% lower risks of T2D were observed at the low intake of junk food pattern (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.87) and the high intake of vegetable-grain pattern (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.95) after adjustment for potential confounding factors, compared with the medium intake of such patterns, respectively. Positive linear relationships were found between fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at follow-up and its change with junk food pattern, while there were inverse linear associations with vegetable-grain pattern.

Conclusion:

Higher adherence to vegetable-grain patterns and lower adherence to junk food patterns significantly lowered T2D incidence among the population in Southwest China. Moving toward a healthier dietary model deserves more attention to develop interventions for the prevention of T2D.

Introduction

The incidence and prevalence of diabetes continue to rise unprecedentedly, and this epidemic has accelerated in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) (1). China has the highest number of people with diabetes in the world (114.4 million in 2020), with type 2 diabetes (T2D) accounting for more than 90% of patients with diabetes and leading to a huge burden on healthcare systems (2). Increased understanding of risk factors for T2D can help reduce morbidity and mortality.

Transition in food consumption among Chinese residents has played an important role in the fast increase of T2D (3) and diet has been identified as a modifiable factor for occurrence and progression in diabetes by many researchers (4, 5). The Guideline for Prevention and Treatment of T2D in China (2020 Edition) also pointed out the necessity to set reasonable treatment targets for medical nutrition (6). Nowadays, dietary pattern analysis has emerged as an alternative and complementary approach to examine the relationship between diet and diseases. It considers the interaction and joint effects of different food items and examines the effects of the overall diet. Several studies have suggested that dietary patterns derived from factor analysis were valued in the nutritional epidemiology of diabetes but different patterns with positive or negative health effects such as the anti-inflammatory dietary pattern were applied (4, 7–9). Such disparities in dietary patterns may be partly due to the diversity in available food, food cooking, and eating habits over study populations in the context of various times, race, and culture, which meant that it should benefit the prevention and control of diabetes to understand particular recommended diet patterns for the local people.

The “refined grains and meat” dietary pattern and the “oil and salt” dietary pattern were reported to increase T2D risk in the Xinjiang Region (10), and individuals with the Western dietary pattern had an elevated risk of T2D in Zhejiang Province, China (11). Even in mainland China, dietary patterns varied over provinces from Northeast China to Southwest China. So far, there were no empirical data on the association between dietary patterns and diabetes in Southwest China. Several specialized dietary patterns were characterized by using factor analysis and their associations with T2D incidence were explored in this community population cohort from Southwest China.

Methods and Materials

Study Population

The Guizhou Population Health Cohort Study (GPHCS) as a prospective community-based population cohort started from 2010 to 2012 with 9,280 adults in Guizhou province, China. Subjects were recruited from 48 townships of 12 counties (or districts) based on a multistage proportional stratified cluster sampling method. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) aged 18 years or above; (2) living in the study region and having no plan to move out; (3) completing survey questionnaire and blood sampling; (4) signing the written informed consent. Baseline information was collected using a structured questionnaire on demographic characteristics, lifestyle, and health conditions while dietary data were measured by the semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire through face-to-face investigation. The questionnaires were designed by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (12) and applied in China's chronic disease surveillance (2010). Venous blood samples were obtained to measure fasting plasma glucose (FPG) for at least 8 h fasting. A 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with 75 g of glucose was carried out for participants. Anthropometric measurements including height and body weight, FPG, OGTT, and HbA1c were measured by trained investigators and doctors.

This cohort was followed up by a repeated investigation from 2016 to 2020 with a follow-up rate of 88% (n = 1,117 loss to follow-up). All deaths were identified through the Death Registration Information System and Basic Public Health Service System. We further excluded participants who left >1 food item blank (n = 277), had a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes (n = 665) reported at baseline, or missed the date of diagnosis of diabetes (n = 18) at follow-up. In total, 7,023 participants were eligible for the analysis (Supplementary Figure 1). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Guizhou Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention (No. S2017-02). All subjects provided written informed consent at enrollment.

Assessment of Dietary, Type 2 Diabetes, and Covariates

For dietary, subjects were asked about the frequency and consumption of 16 aggregated food groups in one recent year. Food intake frequency includes “times per day,” “times per week,” “times per month,” and “times per year” with the average intake per time. Except for egg that was expressed in “number per day” and carbonated soft drinks and other soft drinks in “ml per day,” the unit of other food groups was “50 g per day.” Before data analysis, the average daily intake of each food group was estimated by multiplying the intake frequency and single intake converted into continuous variables and dividing by 1, 7, 30, or 365, respectively. T2D was defined if subjects met either of the following criteria: (1) self-reported doctor diagnosis of diabetes or use of anti-diabetic medications confirmed by medical record review; (2) FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L; (3) OGTT ≥11.1 mmol/L; (4) HbA1c ≥6.5% (13). Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was defined biologically as a fasting plasma glucose concentration from 6.1 to 7.0 mmol/L. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters and categorized as lean (<18.5), normal (18.5–23.9), overweight (24–27.9), obesity (≥28 kg/m²) with the Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Overweight and Obesity in Chinese Adults (14).

Statistics Analysis

Factor analysis with the orthogonal rotation procedure varimax was applied to analyze the intake of 16 food groups and generate main dietary patterns for this study population. The dietary pattern was interpreted and named according to the factor loading matrix, and the scores of dietary patterns were calculated and categorized into tertiles of low, medium, and high. Finally, four factors were obtained with eigenvalues>1 and two factors of them were occupied for this analysis (15, 16). The intake of each food group was described as tertiles of dietary patterns (Supplementary Table 1). The first factor was characterized by the high factor load (0.34–0.54) of fried food, soft drinks, and desserts and named as junk food pattern. The second factor was characterized by the high factor load of vegetable and grain (0.54 and 0.42) and named vegetable-grain pattern. In the medium category of vegetable-grain pattern, the per capita daily vegetable (401.19 g) consumed by participants met the recommended quantity (300–500 g) by the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents (2016 Edition) (17), and therefore the medium intake is used as the reference group.

The Chi-square test for categorical variables was occupied to compare the differences of baseline characteristics and distribution of various dietary patterns over subjects. Continuous variables were shown as means and standard deviations. Person-years (PYs) of follow-up were calculated for each subject from the date of enrolling the cohort to the date of T2D diagnosis, death, or end of follow-up. Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to explore the associations between dietary patterns and T2D incidence. We used the Schoenfeld residuals to test the assumption of hazard proportionality in Cox regression models and found no evidence of non-proportionality. Covariates including age (18–34, 35–49, ≥50 years), BMI value (<18.5, 18.5–23.9, 24–27.9, ≥28 kg/m²), sex, rural (yes, no), Han Chinese (yes, no), education ( ≤ 9 years, >9 years), being married (yes, no), T2D family history (yes, no), smoking status (yes, no), alcohol use (yes, no), physical activity (yes, no), and IFG (yes, no) were adjusted in the model. In China, a BMI <18.5 means that the individuals are lean, and they may have some health problems related to eating or absorption, which have possible effects on diet habits. Also, it is likely that the long-term dietary effects have not been observed in 2 years. Therefore, sensitivity tests were conducted by excluding the individuals who were followed up <2 years or whose BMI was <18.5 at baseline. All statistical tests were two-sided (α = 0.05) and performed using R software (Version 4.0.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Baseline Characteristics

As shown in Table 1, more than half of the 7,023 eligible subjects were the age 18–34 years old and were women. Compared with participants free of T2D, new-onset T2D cases were older, more likely to be Han Chinese, and live in rural areas. They had a higher level of baseline BMI and a lower level of education, too. There were no significant differences in sex, marriage status, T2D family history, fasting plasma glucose levels, and lifestyle including smoking, alcohol drinking, and physical activity.

Distribution of Dietary Patterns

In Table 2, subjects who were over 50 years old, non-Han Chinese, had shorter education years, were married, lived in rural areas, were non-smoker, non-alcohol users, without regular physical activity or T2D family history, with IFG, and lean tended to have low adherence of junk food pattern. Those who were aged from 18 to 34 years old, men, non-Han Chinese, had longer education years, lived in rural areas, smoker, alcohol user, and with IFG were more likely to have high adherence to the vegetable-grain food pattern.

Dietary Patterns and Type 2 Diabetes Incidence

During 50,763.64 person-years of follow-up, 749 incident T2D cases were documented and the incidence was 14.75/1,000 person-years. As shown in Table 3, the junk food pattern was associated with type 2 diabetes incidence. Compared with individuals in the medium score category of junk food pattern, those with the lowest scores got a lower risk of incident T2D after adjusting for potential confounders (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.87). Adjustment for lifestyles including smoking, alcohol drinking, and sport attenuated the association a little, but it still remained significant (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.87). An inverse association was observed between vegetable-grain pattern and incident T2D after multivariable adjustment. Participants at the high score category of the vegetable-grain pattern had a 20% lower risk of T2D (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.95) than those at the medium intake category and this protective effect persisted after further adjusting lifestyles (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.95).

Those findings remained robust in the sensitivity analysis. The protective effects of the highest score of vegetable-grain pattern and the lowest score of junk food pattern were virtually unchanged after excluding those who entered the cohort within 2 years or belonged to the lean one (BMI <18.5) at baseline (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Associations Between Dietary Patterns, and Averages of Follow-Up Fasting Plasma Glucose and Their Changes

Further, potential associations between different dietary patterns, and averages of FPG at follow-up and their changes between baseline and follow-up were explored among non-diabetic participants. For the junk food pattern, the follow-up FPG and its rising change increased with the incremental score of this pattern statistically, and significant inverse trends were observed over vegetable-grain pattern scores (Table 4).

Discussion

Studies regarding the association of empirically derived dietary patterns and the risk of T2D in Southwest China were sparse so far. This prospective study identified two major dietary patterns by factor analysis, and both the junk food pattern and vegetable-grain pattern were significantly associated with T2D among the study population in Southwest China. Those findings remained robust in the sensitivity analysis among those followed up for 2 years or longer and with a BMI of 18.5 or greater at baseline. Moreover, significant positive linear trends were observed for associations between junk food pattern, and averages of follow-up FPG and its changes, and inverse linear trends existed in the associations between vegetable-grain pattern, and averages of follow-up FPG and its changes. Those results were in agreement with previous studies reporting that various dietary patterns were related to incident T2D (18, 19). They suggested that a healthy diet pattern may benefit the prevention and control of T2D and some interventions should be developed to improve the diet behaviors.

In some researches, fruit juices, sweetened beverages, sweets, and desserts had been proved to be less healthy plant foods for diabetes (19, 20). A meta-analysis based on 5 studies suggested that “unhealthy” dietary pattern like consuming higher amounts of high-fat dairy and fried products was associated with a 44% increased risk of diabetes (4). In this study, low intake of junk food pattern, characterized by high consumption of fried food, soft drinks, and desserts resulted in a 28% reduction in risk of T2D compared with medium intake. Dietary components in such a pattern that may affect T2D risk included higher saturated fat and glycemic load from high intakes of snacks and desserts (21, 22), as part of the western pattern's unhealthy constituents. The high glycemic load had been documented to adversely affect insulin sensitivity, a well-established detrimental factor for diabetes (23, 24). On the one hand, a high level of added sugar and calorie content strongly increases the risk for diabetes with weight gain, worse metabolism of glucose, and lower insulin sensitivity (25, 26); on the other hand, advanced glycation of high-fat products can contribute to enhanced oxidative stress and higher inflammatory markers that may be accompanied with insulin resistance (27). But the increased risk was not observed significantly in the high level of such a pattern. One of the possible reasons was that the intake did not reach the dangerous thresholds in the study population. Another was that the sample size was not enough for such association in this study.

Also, the vegetable-grain pattern was observed a protective effect on incident T2D in this study, with a 20% lower T2D risk, which was similar to the results from a previous systematic review and meta-analysis (28). Jordi et al. provided evidence on the inverse relationship between adherence to a plant-based dietary pattern and the risk for developing T2D, too (5). Several potential mechanisms may explain the observed favorable association. Firstly, whole grains and vegetables may bring a rich array of dietary fiber, which has been proved in several prospective studies to reduce levels of inflammatory markers (29, 30). Secondly, one previous study in Chinese patients with diabetes has recognized increasing fiber and rich antioxidant intake from vegetables as an effective approach to lower HbA1c levels (31) and further reduce T2D risk. Thirdly, whole grains, tubers, and vegetables in this pattern had a low glycemic index and may help to improve insulin sensitivity, and thereby enhance glycemic control (19). Of course, it is most likely a combination of dietary factors responsible for the robust associations. However, the findings remain controversial. Contrary to our results, Erber et al. showed that the vegetable pattern did not confer a lower risk for diabetes in women (32). Another previous research also reported refined grains and meat patterns to be a major risk factor for diabetes (10). Although the vegetable-grain pattern in this study shared some components with other patterns, no meat was contained and the concrete effect partly depended on the proportion and category of food items, like the whole or refined grains (23), and dark or light vegetables. The complex difference in components of different patterns may be due to the diversity in race, age, culture, and lifestyle over the different study populations.

To the best of our knowledge, there were few studies on dietary patterns derived from factor analysis in Southwest China. This study highlights the various effects on T2D of different dietary patterns which may be targeted for local people and emphasizes the importance of considering the quality of foods consumed for diabetes. This study had other strengths. On the one hand, this prospective cohort study filled the gap of the association between dietary patterns and T2D risk in Southwest China among diverse minority groups with different food preferences, and those findings offered further insights into the dietary structure for T2D prevention among the adult Chinese population. On the other hand, dietary pattern beyond a single nutrient or food is easier to make recommendations for the local population and improve dietary behaviors for local residents. The limitations of this study should also be noted. First, the baseline covariates information used in the analysis might lead to residual confounding if those covariates may be time-varying. Second, dietary pattern analysis requires subjective decisions in naming the food pattern although some previous studies can be referred to. Third, the effects of different foods may be related to cooking ways, which were not considered in this study. In addition, diet information was self-reported by subjects, and measurement errors were inevitable which may bias the findings from this study.

Conclusion

Higher adherence to the vegetable-grain pattern and lower adherence to the junk food pattern significantly lowered T2D incidence among the Chinese population in Southwest China. Those findings added evidence on the recommendation of healthy dietary patterns to prevent incident T2D for the Chinese adult population in China, especially in Southwest China. Some interventions and policies should be developed and implemented to improve the diet behaviors to prevent and control T2D better among the Chinese population in the future.

Funding

This work was supported by the Guizhou Province Science and Technology Support Program (Qiankehe [2018]2819).

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1.

  TeufelFSeiglieJAGeldsetzerPTheilmannMMarcusMEEbertCet al. Body-mass index and diabetes risk in 57 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative, individual-level data in 685 616 adults. Lancet. (2021) 398:238–48. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00844-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  ChatterjeeSKhuntiKDaviesMJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. (2017) 389:2239–51. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30058-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  ZhangNDuSMMaGS. Current lifestyle factors that increase risk of T2DM in China. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2017) 71:832–8. 10.1038/ejcn.2017.41

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  JannaschFKrögerJSchulzeMB. Dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Nutr. (2017) 147:1174–82. 10.3945/jn.116.242552

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  Salas-SalvadóJBecerra-TomásNPapandreouCBullóM. Dietary patterns emphasizing the consumption of plant foods in the management of type 2 diabetes: a narrative review. Adv Nutr. (2019) 10(Suppl. 4):S320–31. 10.1093/advances/nmy102

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  The Chinese Medical Association Diabetes Association. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in China (2020 Edition). Chin J Diabetes. (2021) 13:315–409. 10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210221-00095

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  MalikVSFungTTvan DamRMRimmEBRosnerBHuFB. Dietary patterns during adolescence and risk of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged women. Diabetes Care. (2012) 35:12–8. 10.2337/dc11-0386

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  HuFB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. (2002) 13:3–9. 10.1097/00041433-200202000-00002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  McGeogheganLMuirheadCRAlmoosawiS. Association between an anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant dietary pattern and diabetes in British adults: results from the national diet and nutrition survey rolling programme years 1-4. Int J Food Sci Nutr. (2015) 67:553–61. 10.1080/09637486.2016.1179268

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  CaiJNuliRZhangYZhangYAbudusemaitiMKadeerAet al. Association of dietary patterns with type 2 diabetes mellitus among middle-aged adults in uygur population of xinjiang region. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. (2019) 65:362–74. 10.3177/jnsv.65.362

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  ShuLShenXMLiCZhangXYZhengPF. Dietary patterns are associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus among middle-aged adults in Zhejiang Province, China. Nutr J. (2017) 16:81. 10.1186/s12937-017-0303-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  ZhaoWHNingG. Contents and methods of chronic disease surveillance project in China in 2010. Chin J Prev Med. (2012) 46:477–9. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2012.05.023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. (2020) 43(Suppl. 1):S14–31. 10.2337/dc20-S002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  China Obesity Working Group. Prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Preparation guide (excerpt). J Nutr. (2004) 26:1–4. 10.13325/j.cnki.acta.nutr.sin.2004.01.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  HatcherLA. Step-By-Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute (1994).

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  LiuQWuMWenQRDuHDLvYGuoYet al. Correlation between dietary patterns and low muscle weight, strength and quality of adults in 10 regions of China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. (2021) 42:780–6. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200618-00855

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  YangYXZhangHM. Introduction to dietary guidelines for Chinese residents 2016. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica. (2016) 38:209–17. 10.13325/j.cnki.acta.nutr.sin.2016.03.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  ShenXMHuangYQZhangXYTongXQZhengPFShuL. Association between dietary patterns and prediabetes risk in a middle-aged Chinese population. Nutr J. (2020) 19:77. 10.1186/s12937-020-00593-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  SatijaABhupathirajuSNRimmEBSpiegelmanDChiuveSEBorgiLet al. Plant-based dietary patterns and incidence of type 2 diabetes in US men and women: results from three prospective cohort studies. PLoS Med. (2016) 13:e1002039. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002039

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  CraigWJMangelsAR. Position of the American Dietetic Association: vegetarian diets. J Am Diet Assoc. (2009) 109:1266–82. 10.1016/j.jada.2009.05.027

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  SalmerónJMansonJEStampferMJColditzGAWingALWillettWC. Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA. (1997) 277:472–7. 10.1001/jama.1997.03540300040031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  FungTTSchulzeMMansonJEWillettWCHuFB. Dietary patterns, meat intake, and the risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Arch Intern Med. (2004) 164:2235–40. 10.1001/archinte.164.20.2235

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  AuneDNoratTRomundstadPVattenLJ. Whole grain and refined grain consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol. (2013) 28:845–58. 10.1007/s10654-013-9852-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  HuEAPanAMalikVSunQ. White rice consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis and systematic review. BMJ. (2012) 344:e1454. 10.1136/bmj.e1454

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  MalikVSPopkinBMBrayGADesprésJPWillettWCHuFB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. (2010) 33:2477–83. 10.2337/dc10-1079

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  Al-KhudairyLStrangesSKumarSAl-DaghriNReesK. Dietary factors and type 2 diabetes in the Middle East: what is the evidence for an association?–a systematic review. Nutrients. (2013) 5:3871–97. 10.3390/nu5103871

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  Lopez-GarciaESchulzeMBFungTTMeigsJBRifaiNMansonJEet al. Major dietary patterns are related to plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. (2004) 80:1029–35. 10.1093/ajcn/80.4.1029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  MaghsoudiZGhiasvandRSalehi-AbargoueiA. Empirically derived dietary patterns and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis on prospective observational studies. Public Health Nutr. (2016) 19:230–41. 10.1017/S1368980015001251

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  NorthCJVenterCSJerlingJC. The effects of dietary fibre on C-reactive protein, an inflammation marker predicting cardiovascular disease. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2009) 63:921–33. 10.1038/ejcn.2009.8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  ButcherJLBeckstrandRL. Fiber's impact on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in cardiovascular disease. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. (2010) 22:566–72. 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00555.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  JiangJQiuHZhaoGZhouYZhangZZhangHet al. Dietary fiber intake is associated with HbA1c level among prevalent patients with type 2 diabetes in Pudong new area of Shanghai, China. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e46552. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046552

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  ErberEHoppingBNGrandinettiAParkSYKolonelLNMaskarinecG. Dietary patterns and risk for diabetes: the multiethnic cohort. Diabetes Care. (2010) 33:532–8. 10.2337/dc09-1621

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar