Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health, 03 October 2022
Sec. Clinical Diabetes
This article is part of the Research Topic Metabolic Miscommunication Among Organs: The Missing Links View all 12 articles

The association between diabetes and nocturia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

\nZhiwei FuZhiwei Fu1Fang WangFang Wang2Xing DangXing Dang3Tao Zhou
Tao Zhou3*
  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
  • 2Department of Nutrition, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, China
  • 3Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, China

Background: Many studies have explored the association between diabetes and nocturia, but it remains unclear. This article systematically analyses existing evidence of the relationship between diabetes and nocturia, including subgroup analysis based on the number of voids, gender, and continent, in the hope of reaching more reliable clinical conclusions relating to diabetes and nocturia.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for identifying studies relating to diabetes and nocturia prior to July 2021. Literature quality evaluation was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. A random effect meta-analysis was used for pooled odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) as a means of evaluating the relationship between diabetes and nocturia.

Results: In total, 29 of 781 potentially relevant studies were proven to be eligible. The overall pooled OR demonstrated that diabetes increases the risk of nocturia (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.38, 1.61; P < 0.00001). The association was found to be more robust among subjects ≥ 1 void than ≥ 2 void (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.41, 2.14; P < 0.00001 vs. OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.33, 1.59; P < 0.00001), in males than females (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.79; P < 0.00001 vs. OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.66; P < 0.0001) and in Asia than Europe or North America (OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.36, 1.75; P < 0.00001 vs. OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.19, 1.72; P = 0.0001 vs. OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.22, 1.73; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Diabetes has an association with a 1.49-fold higher risk of nocturia. This association is more robust for Asian and male subjects or those at a lower nocturia cut-off.

Introduction

Nocturia is an incredibly common and bothersome lower urinary tract symptom (1). The incidence of nocturia increases with age. Large-scale investigations have found the incidence of nocturia of ≥ 2 times per night in 60-year-old to be approximately 25% (2). In addition to sleep disruption and impaired quality of life, nocturia can also result in falls, fractures, and increased mortality among the elderly. High-quality meta-analysis has proven that nocturia increases the risk of falls by approximately 20% and that of fractures by 32% (3). In addition, another meta-analysis has demonstrated that nocturia has an association with a 1.27-fold risk of mortality (4). Therefore, identifying the risk factors of nocturia is of great importance.

Nocturia is closely related to age, but it has many influencing factors, namely, hypertension and diabetes (4). Recent studies have shown diabetes to be related to nocturia with a limited level of evidence. However, with the interference of age, gender, race, and other confounding factors, further research is required regarding whether diabetes is an independent risk factor for nocturia. Therefore, the aim of this article is to comprehensively analyze the relationship between diabetes and nocturia and reach a reliable conclusion for further guiding the clinical management of nocturia.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

Standard preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were adhered to when conducting this review. PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched in order to identify studies relating to diabetes and nocturia that were published before July 2021. Search terms included: “nocturia and (diabetes or hyperglycemia).” Only articles that were published in English were included in the meta-analysis.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion and exclusion criteria were utilized based on the PICOS (patient/population, intervention, control, outcome, systematic) methodology.

Inclusion criteria: Studies that investigated diabetes and nocturia; Articles that included odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs); All the included articles provided the definition of diabetes and nocturia.

Exclusion criteria: System reviews or case reports were excluded; Incomplete data or no OR and 95% CI were excluded; Data from repeatedly published articles was only included once.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Two authors independently searched and screened the literature based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The following data was extracted: First name of author, publication year, patient country, study design, sample size, gender, the definition of diabetes, the minimum number of voids per night, and the number of patients with nocturia. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for evaluating the quality of the included studies (5). All the aforementioned work was independently performed by two authors and any differing opinions were resolved through a discussion with a third author.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed using RevMan 5.3. We pooled the OR and 95% CI to evaluate the effect of diabetes on nocturia, and z-test was used to assess for statistical significance. Computed values for Cochran's Q test were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Random effects model was performed for high heterogeneity among studies (P < 0.05 or I2 > 50%). Otherwise, the fixed effects model was used. A funnel plot across all studies was made for the evaluation of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was performed through the removal of individual studies.

For accurately investigating the relationship between diabetes and nocturia, multiple subgroup analyses were conducted. Weighted ORs were pooled in different subgroups according to 1-void and 2-void, male and female, patient continent, single-factor and multi-factor analysis.

Results

Literature screening and quality assessment

We initially screened 781 abstracts, and 439 articles were deleted due to duplication. After reading the full text of 71 articles, 29 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis (634). The screening flowchart was shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The flowchart showing study search and selection process.

In total, 29 articles were included in the analysis performed in this article and the quality scores of the included literature are shown in Table 1. A total of 197,809 subjects were incorporated into the meta-analysis. The basic characteristics of the literature, namely, gender, the definition of diabetes, the minimum number of voids per night, and the number of patients with nocturia, can be seen in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Basic characteristics and data of included articles.

Association of diabetes and nocturia

All 29 studies that were included explored the association between diabetes and nocturia (634). The heterogeneity among studies was found to be high and the random effect model was used (P < 0.00001, I2 = 72%). Pooled OR demonstrated that diabetes increases the risk of nocturia (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.38, 1.61; P < 0.00001) (Figure 2). In subgroup analysis based on the number of voids, the association was found to be more robust in subjects ≥ 1 void than ≥ 2 void (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.41, 2.14; P < 0.00001 vs. OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.33, 1.59; P < 0.00001).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Forest plot for the association between diabetes and nocturia stratified by number of nocturia. Nocturia ≥1 void (A), nocturia ≥2 void (B).

Stratification by gender

For subgroup classification according to gender, 12 studies provided data relating to men (6, 8, 11, 16, 18, 20, 21, 27, 29, 31, 32, 34) and nine studies provided data relating to women (6, 8, 12, 14, 16, 21, 28, 31, 34). Pooled OR showed that diabetes increases the risk of nocturia for men (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.79; P < 0.00001) and women (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.66; P < 0.0001) (Figure 3). Heterogeneity among both men (P = 0.006, I2 = 58%) and women (P = 0.009, I2 = 61%) was found to be lower than heterogeneity for the overall cohort (P < 0.0001, I2 = 66%).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Forest plot for the association between diabetes and nocturia stratified by gender. Men (A), Women (B).

Stratification by country

In total, 5 studies provided data relating to Europe (7, 11, 21, 26, 28), 8 studies provided data relating to North America (10, 15, 16, 20, 22, 25, 27, 29), 1 study provided data relating to South America (6), and 15 studies provided data relating to Asia (8, 9, 1214, 1719, 23, 24, 3034). Regardless of the continent, diabetes increases the risk of diabetes. The pooled OR for the Asia subgroup was 1.54 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.75; P < 0.00001). The pooled OR for Asian participants was higher than for Europe subgroup (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.19, 1.72; P = 0.0001) or North America (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.22, 1.73; P < 0.0001) (Figure 4). A South American study showed that diabetes increases the risk of nocturia to a greatest extent (OR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.86, 4.81; P < 0.00001). Heterogeneity among both Europe (P = 0.0004, I2 = 78%) and North America (P < 0.0001, I2 = 78%) was higher than the heterogeneity for the overall cohort (P < 0.00001, I2 = 74%). In contrast, the heterogeneity of the Asia participants (P = 0.0001, I2 = 65%) was lower than the overall cohort. High heterogeneity among subgroups (P = 0.04, I2 = 64.7%).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Forest plot for the association between diabetes and nocturia stratified by country. Europe (A), North America (B), South America (C), Asia (D).

Stratification by univariate and multivariate analysis

A total of 14 studies provided data relating to univariate analysis (711, 15, 18, 20, 2225, 29, 33) and 25 studies provided data relating to multivariate analysis (614, 1621, 24, 2634). The pooled results proved that diabetes significantly increases the risk of nocturia in univariate analysis (OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.54, 2.51; P < 0.00001). The pooled OR for univariate was found to be higher than the overall results (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.54, 1.89; P < 0.00001), while the pooled OR for multivariate analysis (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.70; P < 0.00001) was lower than the overall results (Figure 5). Heterogeneity among univariate (P < 0.00001, I2 = 89%), multivariate (P < 0.00001, I2 = 76%), and overall analysis (P < 0.00001, I2 = 87%) was found to be higher. The heterogeneity among subgroups was high (P = 0.07, I2 =69.3%). This indicates that multivariate analysis can weaken the interference other factors have on the results.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Forest plot for the association between diabetes and nocturia stratified by univariate analysis (A) and multivariate analysis (B).

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

We constructed a funnel plot to detect publication bias for diabetes and nocturia frequency. There is no publication bias for all studies (Supplementary Figure 1). When performed sensitivity analysis by removing individual studies, no sources of heterogeneity were found.

Discussion

This is believed to be the first meta-analysis that explores the relationship between diabetes and nocturia. The conclusions reached following this systematic review have significant guiding value for clinical practice. First, of the 197,809 subjects that were analyzed, diabetes increased the risk of nocturia by approximately 49%, the probability increasing to 1.74-fold for subjects ≥ 1 void nocturia. In addition, in subgroup classification based on gender, diabetes increased the risk of nocturia among males (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.79; P < 0.00001) and females (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.66; P < 0.0001). The association between diabetes and nocturia was found to be stronger in male subjects than in female subjects. In addition, the pooled OR for Asia (OR: 1.54) was found to be higher than Europe (OR: 1.43) and North America (OR: 1.45). There is a greater likelihood of diabetes being related to nocturia in Asians than in Europeans and Americans. Furthermore, diabetes significantly increased the risk of nocturia in univariate analysis (OR: 1.97), but OR dropped to 1.55 in the multivariate analysis. This demonstrates that many factors interfere with the effect of diabetes on nocturia, and these factors will be discussed later.

Most studies have found that after making adjustments for other factors, diabetes is an independent risk factor for nocturia (6, 18, 32). However, relatively few studies have reported that diabetes and nocturia are two independent diseases (20, 24). Diabetes is a common cause of nocturia for several reasons. Osmotic diuresis secondary to hyperglycemia can significantly increase the output of urine during the night (35). In addition, diabetes-induced cerebrovascular disease or peripheral nerve stimulation resulting in bladder sensory dysfunction or detrusor overactivity may be a cause of overactive bladder (36). A survey that was conducted in Japan found that 25% of patients with diabetes also had bladder detrusor hyperreflexia (37).

Although a strong correlation exists between nocturia and age, the link between diabetes and nocturia appears to have no connection with age, potentially due to the fact that the prevalence of diabetes increases with age. Many studies have found that following adjustments for the effects of age, diabetes has a significant association with nocturia (18, 32). The results of this study are in accordance with previous studies that found diabetes to increase the risk of nocturia even following adjustments made for age, gender, and other factors in multivariate analysis (OR: 1.55).

The more robust relationship between diabetes and nocturia remains controversial in men in comparison to women. In the subgroup classification based on gender in this article, the association between diabetes and nocturia was found to be slightly stronger among men (OR: 1.59) than women (OR: 1.41). However, a meta-analysis indicated that the correlation between hypertension and nocturia is stronger in women (OR: 1.45) than in men (OR: 1.28) (38). This demonstrates that the influence of gender on nocturia is interfered with by accompanying diseases. In addition, the influence gender has on nocturia and the influence diabetes has on bladder function are also interfered with by several confounding factors. In a study that was conducted by Tikinen et al. (39) women younger than 50 years were found to have a higher incidence of nocturia than men of the same age, but the increase rate of nocturia in men was observed as being twice as fast as that of older women. Bing et al. noted that although there is a similar prevalence of nocturia in men and women, women have a higher tolerance to nocturia than men (7). A study found bladder dysfunction caused by diabetes to account for 59.26% of women and 74.07% of men (40). This proves that the degree of association between diabetes and nocturia differs between genders.

Many studies have reported the incidence of nocturia to vary between people of different races. Limited by several races included in one study, subgroup analysis could only be performed by continent. Only one study in South America has investigated the relationship between diabetes and nocturia, so the level of evidence for the results is incredibly low. A more robust association was found between diabetes and nocturia in Asia (OR: 1.54) than in Europe (OR: 1.43) or North America (OR: 1.45). The strong association between diabetes and nocturia in Asia may prove to be particularly useful, particularly considering the fact that Asians are more prone to organ damage resulting from diabetes. The inclusion of several races in individual studies has resulted in particularly high heterogeneity within the group. Therefore, the correlation between diabetes and nocturia in different continents warrants further study.

The strengths of this review include a contemporary search of studies published in English, duplicate assessment of inclusion criteria, and the quality of evidence and extracted data. This is believed to be the first meta-analysis that explores the relationship between diabetes and nocturia. Through an overall evaluation and subgroup analysis, the results of this study provide evidence of an association between diabetes and nocturia. However, there were inevitably some limitations with the meta-analysis in this study. First, many subjects were diagnosed with diabetes based on their medical histories rather than the current status of hyperglycemia. Second, the nocturia data that was obtained through questionnaires was found to be too subjective. Third, pertinent diseases such as hypertension, obesity, and other diseases that may strengthen the association between diabetes and nocturia were not examined. Fourth, the subgroup analysis by country was unable to provide an analysis based on race. At last, the significant difference in the number of cases that were included in the study may lead to biased results.

Conclusions

Diabetes has an association with a 1.49-fold higher risk of nocturia. This association is more robust for Asian and male subjects or those at a lower nocturia cut-off.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

ZF wrote the manuscript. FW collected and analyzed the data. XD helped the review and revised the manuscript. TZ helped to design the study and revised the article. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the authors and patients of the included studies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.924488/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Hashim H, Blanker MH. International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for nocturia and nocturnal lower urinary tract function. Neurourol Urodyn. (2019) 38:499–508. doi: 10.1002/nau.23917

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bosch JL, Weiss JP. The prevalence and causes of nocturia. J Urol. (2013) 189:S86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Pesonen JS, Vernooij RWM, Cartwright R, Aoki Y, Agarwal A, Mangera A, et al. The Impact of nocturia on falls and fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. (2020) 203:674–83. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Pesonen JS, Cartwright R, Vernooij RWM, Aoki Y, Agarwal A, Mangera A, et al. The impact of nocturia on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. (2020) 203:486–95. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Wells G, Shea B, 0'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcasstle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomised Studies in Meta-Analysis. Available online at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed July 4, 2021).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

6. Azuero J, Santander J, Trujillo CG, Caicedo JI, Zuluaga L, Becerra AM, et al. Potential associations of adult nocturia. Results from a national prevalence study. Neurourol Urodyn. (2021) 40:819–28. doi: 10.1002/nau.24624

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bing MH, Moller LA, Jennum P, Mortensen S, Lose G. Nocturia and associated morbidity in a Danish population of men and women aged 60–80 years. BJU Int. (2008) 102:808–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07813.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Chow PM, Liu SP, Chuang YC, Lee KS, Yoo TK, Liao L, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of nocturia in China, South Korea, and Taiwan: results from a cross-sectional, population-based study. World J Urol. (2018) 36:1853–62. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2329-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Chung JH, Moon HS, Park SY, Kim KR, Cho SH, Kim YT. Effect of nocturnal hypoxia on nocturia in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Int Neurourol J. (2019) 23:161–68. doi: 10.5213/inj.1938026.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fitzgerald MP, Litman HJ, Link CL, McKinlay JB. The association of nocturia with cardiac disease, diabetes, body mass index, age and diuretic use: results from the BACH survey. J Urol. (2007) 177:1385–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gourova LW, van de Beek C, Spigt MG, Nieman FH, van Kerrebroeck PE. Predictive factors for nocturia in elderly men: a cross-sectional study in 21 general practices. BJU Int. (2006) 97:528–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06029.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hsieh CH, Kuo TC, Hsu CS, Chang ST, Lee MC. Nocturia among women aged 60 or older in Taiwan. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. (2008) 48:312–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00870.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Huang MH, Chiu AF, Wang CC, Kuo HC. Prevalence and risk factors for nocturia in middle-aged and elderly people from public health centers in Taiwan. Int Braz J Urol. (2012) 38:818–24. doi: 10.1590/1677-553820133806818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ito H, Aoki Y, Oe H, Taga M, Tsuchiyama K, Yokoyama O. Low and high body mass index values are associated with female nocturia. Neurourol Urodyn. (2019) 38:2250–54. doi: 10.1002/nau.24126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Johnson T M. 2nd, Sattin R W, Parmelee P, Fultz N H, Ouslander J G. Evaluating potentially modifiable risk factors for prevalent and incident nocturia in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2005) 53:1011–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53321.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kim JS, Chung HS, Yu JM, Cho ST, Moon S. Analyzing the factors associated with nocturia in older people in the United States. Ann Geriatr Med Res. (2018) 22:184–88. doi: 10.4235/agmr.18.0044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kim SY, Bang W, Kim MS, Park B, Kim JH, Choi HG. Analysis of the prevalence and factors associated with nocturia in adult Korean Men. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:41714. doi: 10.1038/srep41714

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Liao CH, Chiang HS, Yu HJ. Serum testosterone levels significantly correlate with nocturia in men aged 40-79 years. Urology. (2011) 78:631–5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Liew LC, Tiong HY, Wong ML, Png DC, Tan JK. A population study of nocturia in Singapore. BJU Int. (2006) 97:109–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05867.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Lightner DJ, Krambeck AE, Jacobson DJ, McGree ME, Jacobsen SJ, Lieber MM, et al. Nocturia is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease and death. BJU Int. (2012) 110:848–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10806.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Madhu C, Coyne K, Hashim H, Chapple C, Milsom I, Kopp Z. Nocturia: risk factors and associated comorbidities; findings from the EpiLUTS study. Int J Clin Pract. (2015) 69:1508–16. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Mekki P, Monaghan TF. Nocturia and electrocardiographic abnormalities among patients at an inner-city cardiology clinic. Neurourol Urodyn. (2021) 40:509–14. doi: 10.1002/nau.24590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Nakagawa H, Niu K, Hozawa A, Ikeda Y, Kaiho Y, Ohmori-Matsuda K, et al. Impact of nocturia on bone fracture and mortality in older individuals: a Japanese longitudinal cohort study. J Urol. (2010) 184:1413–8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Obayashi K, Saeki K, Kurumatani N. Relationship between asymmetric dimethylarginine and nocturia in the general elderly population: The HEIJO-KYO cohort. Neurourol Urodyn. (2015) 34:769–73. doi: 10.1002/nau.22647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Parthasarathy S, Fitzgerald M, Goodwin JL, Unruh M, Guerra S, Quan S F. Nocturia, sleep-disordered breathing, and cardiovascular morbidity in a community-based cohort. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e30969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030969

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Rembratt A, Norgaard J P, Andersson KE. Nocturia and associated morbidity in a community-dwelling elderly population. BJU Int. (2003) 92:726–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04467.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Stone BV, Shoag J, Halpern JA, Mittal S, Lewicki P, Golombos DM, et al. Prostate size, nocturia and the digital rectal examination: a cohort study of 30 500 men. BJU Int. (2017) 119:298–304. doi: 10.1111/bju.13613

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Tikkinen KA, Auvinen A, Johnson TM. 2nd, Weiss JP, Keränen T, Tiitinen A, et al. A systematic evaluation of factors associated with nocturia–the population-based FINNO study. Am J Epidemiol. (2009) 170:361–8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Victor RG, Li N, Blyler CA, Mason OR, Chang LC, Moy NPB, et al. Nocturia as an unrecognized symptom of uncontrolled hypertension in black men aged 35 to 49 years. J Am Heart Assoc. (2019) 8:e010794. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010794

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Wang Y, Hu H, Xu K, Zhang X, Wang X, Na Y, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and symptom bother of nocturia: a population-based survey in China. World J Urol. (2015) 33:677–83. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1411-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Wen L, Wen YB, Wang ZM, Wen JG, Li ZZ, Shang XP, et al. Risk factors of nocturia (two or more voids per night) in Chinese people older than 40 years. Neurourol Urodyn. (2015) 34:566–70. doi: 10.1002/nau.22623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Yoshimura K, Terada N, Matsui Y, Terai A, Kinukawa N, Arai Y. Prevalence of and risk factors for nocturia: analysis of a health screening program. Int J Urol. (2004) 11:282–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00791.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Yow HY, Tiong JJL, Mai CW, van der Werf E, Zainuddin ZM, Toh CC, et al. Prevalence of nocturia among community-dwelling adults: a population-based study in Malaysia. BMC Urol. (2021) 21:95. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00860-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zhang X, Zhang J, Chen J, Zhang C, Li Q, Xu T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of nocturia and nocturia-related quality of life in the Chinese population. Urol Int. (2011) 86:173–8. doi: 10.1159/000321895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Weiss JP, Weinberg AC, Blaivas JG. New aspects of the classification of nocturia. Curr Urol Rep. (2008) 9:362–7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-008-0063-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, et al. The American urological association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The measurement committee of the American urological association. J Urol. (1992) 148:1549–57. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36966-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ueda T, Yoshimura N, Yoshida O. Diabetic cystopathy: relationship to autonomic neuropathy detected by sympathetic skin response. J Urol. (1997) 157:580–4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65209-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Rahman SN, Cao DJ, Monaghan TF, Flores VX, Vaysblat M, Moy MW, et al. Phenotyping the association between nocturia and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. (2021) 205:1577–83. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tikkinen KA, Tammela TL, Huhtala H, Auvinen A. Is nocturia equally common among men and women? A population based study in Finland. J Urol. (2006) 175:596–600. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00245-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kebapci N, Yenilmez A, Efe B, Entok E, Demirustu C. Bladder dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients. Neurourol Urodyn. (2007) 26:814–9. doi: 10.1002/nau.20422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: nocturia, diabetes, risk, systematic review, meta-analysis

Citation: Fu Z, Wang F, Dang X and Zhou T (2022) The association between diabetes and nocturia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Public Health 10:924488. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924488

Received: 20 April 2022; Accepted: 19 August 2022;
Published: 03 October 2022.

Edited by:

Maria João Meneses, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal

Reviewed by:

Liao Peng, Sichuan University, China
Wei Wang, West China Hospital, China
Carlos Levi D'Ancona, State University of Campinas, Brazil

Copyright © 2022 Fu, Wang, Dang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tao Zhou, taozhou123456@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.