Abstract
This research study focuses on the employee's job performance of private small firms during the post COVID-19 situation. After the COVID these small family firms try to regain their business, but their efforts are not that much successful. This situation creates a financial crisis in these firms, and they are unable to provide sufficient monetary rewards to their employees. This situation creates unrest among the employees of these small firms. To manage this issue, social rewards and psychological rewards played their role. The study uses a causal research design with a correlational study design in a non-contrived environment. Minimal researcher interference has been assured. AMOS 24 has dealt with the mediation in study design with bootstrap methodology. The study was conducted on 250 employees of different private small family firms across Punjab province using a proportionate stratified sampling technique. A study's finding suggests that top management enhances employee performance in their organizations by introducing the organization's psychological rewards. In contrast, introducing social rewards does not significantly impact employee performance while considering satisfaction and motivation as a mediating variable.
Introduction
Job creation is the top priority of policymakers in every developing country. With many countries experiencing rapid growth in the population, governments must create a significant number of employments to keep up with labor demand, and even more, jobs are required for economic growth. Small firms have created more and large number of employments than larger firms. This helps to grow the economy of the developing countries (1). Small firms need skilled labor and loyal employees for effective production. If the employees or laborers are satisfied with their jobs, their performance would have increased. In this era, it is hard to find skilled and loyal labor. Firms must provide the best working atmosphere for their employees, so they work in a healthy work environment that satisfies them with their jobs. Social recognition, acceptance, and praise significantly impact the employee has good reputation and motivation to have such social approvals (2).
It is essential to understand that retaining essential employees serves what purpose in the company while maintaining their performance up to the maximum level. According to earlier research, the typical business loses $1 million for every ten managers and professionals leave. More than 2 years of compensation and benefits are required to replace an exempt employee who is terminated for cause (3). When a key employee departs from a firm, valuable knowledge is lost that might significantly impact the company's financial health. Through the use of this information, customers' needs and expectations are satisfied. The term “knowledge management” refers to creating, gathering, and using data to benefit a company's operations. While information is recognized as an organization's most valuable asset today, many firms lack the mechanisms necessary to preserve and use its value (4, 5). Companies must actively participate in knowledge management rather than depending on the premise that employees are acquiring and using information and that knowledge sources are freely available. Firms are designing systems that use the value of information to sustain their competitive advantage. It's easy to see the consequences of losing individuals with access to critical information. Human capital and knowledge management are based on the premise that workers are a company's most crucial asset due to their diverse range of skills, information, and perspectives. Skills, knowledge, and experiences are regarded as capital because of their ability to boost output (6, 7). To the extent that more resources are allocated to a machine, it is more probable that it will be productive. This is according to the human capital idea. According to human capital theory, business investments in human capital are more profitable and more likely to last for a longer period of time. Keeping your personnel is critical to getting the most return on your investment. Human capital theory uses an employee's length of service as a proxy for their job-related knowledge or ability. A person's work-related knowledge or ability affects everything from pay and progress to job type (8, 9). People who have worked for an organization for a long period of time have a high level of intellectual capital. It was said that intellectual capital is “competence multiplied by commitment,” which indicates that a company's knowledge, talents, and traits are amplified by the will to work of everyone inside it. Recognizing employees' commitment to a firm and creating an environment that encourages long-term commitment will be crucial in the future years. Individual knowledge that has been developed through time must be preserved or organizations will continue to lose valuable intellectual capital. A company's deep awareness of its sector is one of the most important factors that contribute to today's success in the global marketplace (10, 11).
The small firms act like cushions to economic shocks for the country's economic stability. In Pakistan, primarily small firms remain small a few of them expand. In this study, the main focus is on the employee productivity and satisfaction by giving them social and psychological rewards. The social exchange theory argues that social behavior is motivated by the ratio of social rewards. According to this theory, people involved in social behavior when there is any benefit for them, not only monetary but social acceptance from others (12). COVID-19 has a significant influence on society. The economic conditions are also affected by this situation. In this situation, the firms can only give the salary to their employees. The firms focus on enhancing the employee's productivity by providing them social and psychological rewards that are not monetary. So the firms do not have to invest money in this critical situation.
Many researchers do their research on employee performance in small firms (13). Understand the impact of employee learning on staff motivation (14). Research about the effects on employee performance and satisfaction (15). This study measure job attitude among 80 employees of four different small businesses. Each employee filled a survey form. Employees show clear difference in their job satisfaction.
Research gap
The gap of this research is that there are two mediator studied in this research. There are millions of other variables that are affecting on employee performance. In previous studies, researchers did not study specific variables like social rewards, psychological rewards, and employee motivation and satisfaction with employee performance, especially in Pakistan, but they studied it with different variables. Other researchers studied employee performance and satisfaction together but they did not study in perspective of social and psychological rewards (16).
Research objective
The study seeks to achieve the following objectives:
Examine the link between employee contentment and productivity.
Employee happiness and motivation to understand the practical effects of social incentives on workplace performance.
To determine the practical effects of psychological incentives on the performance of employees via the pleasure and motivation of employees.
Find out what reward is most suited for a small family-owned business.
Research questions
This research question is more clarified with sub-questions:
Is there any effect of social rewards on employee performance in firms?
Is there any effect of psychological rewards on employee performance in firms?
Is there a correlation between employee happiness and productivity?
This research is conducted to answer the following question; what is the impact of social and psychological rewards on employee performance affecting employee satisfaction?
Significance of the study
To maintain its finest personnel for the long term, every sector uses a combination of financial and non-financial incentives. In this research, small businesses and industries learn how to boost employee happiness and productivity by creating a healthy work environment. This study also helps firms to know that the social or psychological rewards help to attract the employees.
The purpose of this research is to get insight and understanding of employee's minds for their satisfaction by social and psychological rewards to increase their performance. The study's objective is to provide information to small firms to keep employees satisfied and increase their performance by non-monetary rewards.
Literature review
Theoretical model development
Before moving on to the literature review, it is important to understand why these variables need to be studied together and what theories supported this theoretical framework which is depicted in Figure 1, and why could it be considered an important management problem? The theoretical framework used in this study is backed by the Componential Theory of Creativity (17). According to this theory it specifically focuses on the social and psychological rewards given by the organizations, which could ultimately enhance the level of creativity of its employees. This level of creativity could lead toward the improved performance of employees in the organization. This kind of theoretical framework and research work is also supported by different studies (18–20) which focuses upon the need of finding effective non-monetary rewards which could lead toward the enhanced employee performance through motivation and satisfaction.
Figure 1
Theoretical model.
Social rewards
It's not always as easy to achieve social objectives as achieving more fundamental physiological ones, like getting enough food. Many of society's aspirations are nebulous and ill-defined. When a person's hunger causes them to seek out cake, they can readily determine whether they achieved their aim or not. As a result, it is less evident how to go about finding a social connection, and whether one has really succeeded is a matter of debate. No crumbs or chocolate-smeared surfaces are left in the aftermath of social aims, in contrast to cake. How might readers connect proximal reward signals to their ultimate goals (21, 22). Previous studies have identified two main problems in understanding how proximate incentives assist individuals attain their ultimate social objectives. The first step is to identify the fundamental social values and incentives that drive ordinary social conduct. What are the underlying principles of human behavior (23, 24). Second, how people's social activities help them achieve their ultimate social objectives, what determines the degree to which an action may attain those goals. Existing research suggests two complementary methods for dealing with each problem. Decontextualizing social incentives to understand how proximal components (i.e., social rewards) influence social actions is the first step they advocate (25). The strength of each fundamental element may be gauged by measuring its value. These elements that remain valued even when separated from the rewarding outcomes they are meant to anticipate serve as the most strong or fundamental drivers of social conduct. Those who cherish the presence of others may seek out ways to see others (e.g., look at photos of their faces) even if they cannot communicate with them directly. Fundamental motivations should be quantifiable even if the final aim is not achieved. These fundamental societal ideals may be identified by decontextualization (26). As a follow-up, they advocate recontextualizing incentives by returning motivation and context to social conduct in order to comprehend how social actions support their ultimate aims. Several variables might affect whether or not a person's purpose is met, such as the social context and the individual's motives. Approaching a smiling friend should strengthen social connection, yet approaching an adversary who smiles could put one in danger. As well as influencing action like approaching a smiling person, context also affects the perceived value of fundamental social elements. For example, a grin from a foe has less value than a smile from a friend. This reassessment illuminates the ultimate societal objectives that a smile's social worth is pointing toward societal behavior and its ultimate social purposes are examined via various complementary perspectives. Evaluating people's social values and the forces that may and cannot influence those values is at the heart of both methods. It's possible to get insight into social rewards and the higher-level objectives that motivate them by looking at how our brain's reward system promotes social conduct. Each method is discussed in turn, and the framework's consequences for our knowledge of the building blocks of social incentives, their growth, and their influence on employee performance are discussed (27).
Although social rewards are not tangible, they are generated through social encounters. The social reward dimension refers to many aspects of social conditions and employee work relationships, and it measures the degree of external public recognition and internal social support as felt by employees (28). It also created a pleasant sensation of wellbeing when one feels accepted and belongs during social encounters. Social rewards were typically feelings of wellbeing, enjoyment, and interactions with others (29).
Social incentives are vital in promoting and retaining employee happiness in all industries. It is possible that social incentives might be a key factor in enhancing employee efficiency. If a company is serious about increasing productivity, it has to know how to encourage employees and ensure that they are adequately rewarded for their efforts (30).
Social rewards contribute to a positive sense of wellbeing because one feels like they belong, are recognized by others through social activities, and can feel superior through tasks and social interactions (1). The social reward aspect relates to many aspects of the social environment and employee work relationships. It measures the degree of exterior public recognition and internal social support that workers feel. It also produces a favorable sensation of wellbeing when one feels accepted and belongs in social interactions. The most common social rewards were feelings of wellbeing, enjoyment, and social interactions (6).
H1: Social rewards create a positive impact on employee's performance.
H2: Social rewards mediated by employee motivation positively impact employee's performance.
H3: Social rewards mediated by employee satisfaction positively impact employee's performance.
H4: Social rewards positively impact employee performance through serial mediation of employee motivation and the employee satisfaction.
Psychological rewards
Employees' wellbeing may be improved in five ways: by providing them with meaningful work, flexibility, a variety of challenges, and a work environment they appreciate. When workers connect with their responsibilities and find them rewarding, their employment is meaningful, according to previous studies. When workers have the freedom to act on their own initiative, it is seen as flexible; on the other hand, it is seen as demanding when employees are given the chance to use their talents (31). Employees will be more engaged in their work if their tasks are fascinating and gratifying. According to early research, a combination of extrinsic and intrinsic incentives has been shown to motivate and maintain effective human capital. Other people or organizations give cash or non-financial incentives to workers, known as extrinsic rewards. An employee's job provides the reward when it comes to intrinsic incentives (32). As a result, psychological benefits result from one's labor when it is relevant and well-executed. Workers' psychological needs are met via intrinsic rewards, which are internally mediated and contribute to employees' sense of self. Psychological incentives play a particularly crucial role for workers of small family businesses since they are often paid less than their counterparts in larger enterprises. Small family businesses in developing nations are thought to have the lowest real pay increase budgets and compensation range changes (33). Full-time workers are more likely to be paid less than their private or government colleagues. These findings show the need to research intrinsic incentives in the context of small businesses. There are, however, just a few studies that use quantitative instruments that have been shown to be trustworthy when testing across cultures to determine intrinsic rewards. HR managers who advise small family business workers might benefit from an accurate assessment of intrinsic job incentives (34).
Employees benefit from psychological benefits that strongly link job satisfaction and firm performance. Personality attributes such as confidence, assertiveness, and the ability to see the importance in one's work all contribute to a person's overall wellbeing and fulfillment. For example, an employee's capacity to express a feeling of achievement or duty is a psychological reward, as is the ability to convey a sense of accomplishment to the employee (35).
By giving the psychological rewards to the employees, that are interest of many employees, the satisfaction of the employees toward their job is increased. In this way the employees remain motivated and their performance also enhanced that the firms want. When a task is completed effectively, it is usual for individuals to feel a feeling of accomplishment and satisfaction. In order to keep the good sentiments going, the employee must continue to perform well in his or her job (36). Workplace intrinsic benefits may include things like pride in one's work, respect from superiors and/or coworkers, personal development, increased trust in management, satisfaction from one's job and belonging to a team, and the acquisition of new skills a sense of success. For many people, being free to select the job they wish to do is an innate joy. Incentives have been demonstrated to improve employee productivity in studies (37). In the workplace, psychological reward refers to the benefits that employee receives as a consequence of favorable professional interpersonal interactions with his or her clients, coworkers, or supervisors, such as trust, recognition, and praise. Psychological benefits do not need monetary inputs since they just call for dedication, dedication, and effort on the part of the recipient (38).
Individuals' work attitudes may be positively influenced by psychological rewards, which serve to increase morale. Psychological reward serves as a supply of motivating resources in the pursuit of happiness as a form of innate psychological need. That is, if it is not met, it may have a negative impact on people's subjective wellbeing.
H5: Psychological rewards create a positive impact on employee's performance.
H6: Psychological rewards mediated by employee motivation positively impact employee's performance.
H7: Psychological rewards mediated by employee satisfaction positively impact employee's performance.
H8: Psychological rewards positively impact employee performance through serial mediation of employee motivation and the employee satisfaction.
Employee motivation
Motivation's major goal is to make it simpler for people to modify their behavior. Intrinsic motivation is the driving force behind a person's actions toward a certain objective. In a study on employee motivation, the results showed that motivation influenced outcomes such as productivity, performance and persistence. Studies show that motivated employees are more self-driven than their less motivated counterparts because they are more focused on their own independence and autonomy. As a result, highly motivated employees are better equipped to take advantage of the many opportunities for professional advancement that exist. In a similar line, motivated employees are more committed to their jobs than their less motivated counterparts, resulting in better quality work (39).
If you want your dreams to come true, you must have a strong drive to succeed. Whatever influences people's behavior in order to reach a certain objective qualifies as a motivator. Our definition of “motivation” is the means through which an individual's desire to achieve their goals is accounted for, together with their interactions with their environment and the results of that interaction (40). Motivational processes significantly impact a person's overall strength and direction of action. Although motivated behavior happens only in the here and now, its attention is on the future within this time. Workers' work habits are influenced by their degree of motivation at the time. Workplace motivation, whether intrinsic or extrinsic, is critical to employees' wellbeing since it is the fundamental driver behind their attendance. An intrinsic motivation is fueled by a person's interest, pleasure, or enjoyment in a certain activity. Extrinsic motivation occurs when you engage in a task because you like it or find it pleasant (41).
If you want to be inspired, you must know what drives you and what inspires you. Therefore, it is difficult for a person to feel motivated by just partially addressing their needs. One set of demands is fulfilled and another is created; motivation leads to goal-directed behavior; a person behaves in order to achieve their own aims and wants; and there is no one-size-fits-all philosophy or approach to motivation since individuals have varied motivations; Managers need to have an understanding of many different types of motivating elements in order to be effective (42).
Today's competitive business world necessitates that successful organizations find new and innovative methods to motivate and inspire their employees. This is contrary to the findings of earlier research, which reveal that no organization can progress or flourish if its employees are not motivated to do their duties. Every organization's success is closely linked to its employees' motivation, dedication, and perseverance (43). As a consequence, one of the most important jobs or obligations of a leader is to inspire others. An organization's leadership begins with the initial effort to hire a new employee and continues through the whole induction process and every day until the person quits the organization. The importance of leadership to a firm is once again highlighted in the process of bringing in new employees (44). Employee motivation depends on the quality of the boss-employee relationship. Employees who are surrounded by colleagues who exhibit a professional, happy, and polite demeanor are more inclined to follow suit. Organizational culture directly influences employee engagement, productivity, wellbeing, and overall wellbeing in the workplace. Some experts in the field believe that a company's management style affects employee motivation. A lot of individuals disagree on whether or not it's possible to cultivate leaders from scratch. From the discussions on motivation, it's evident that individuals have a broad variety of traits. Many of these effects may be handed down via DNA or acquired through exposure to various environmental stressors (45).
The topic of motivation is covered in more depth in the field of organizational behavior, which includes a wide range of models and theories that are pertinent to the topic of motivation. Significant emphasis is placed on the development and advancement of staff members. According to a number of studies, growth is the single most significant incentive for those who attempt to maximize the potential of their staff. It has been discovered that there is an indisputable connection between the motivation of workers, their level of job satisfaction, and their level of commitment to their organizations. The motivation of workers is the single most crucial factor in every company's success, regardless of whether the business in question is public or private. According to the findings of a study that investigated the connection between employee motivation and job satisfaction, businesses that used a variety of motivational programs that centered on three distinct concepts namely, camaraderie, equity, and achievement were judged to be more successful than businesses that either had no “enthusiastic” employees or twice as many of them. Participants in the research numbered 135,000 and came from a wide range of nationalities and cultural backgrounds (46). The researchers that conducted the study to establish the link between employee motivation and employee performance came to the conclusion that an increase in employee motivation leads to an increase in employee performance as a direct consequence of the rise in employee motivation (47).
H9: Employee Motivation creates a positive impact on employee's performance.
Employee satisfaction
Employee satisfaction has been examined extensively in various sectors, including army, healthcare, civil service, business, psychology, and sociology, according to a review of the literature. Over time, the concept has evolved. However, no significant implication was produced. It is a complex phenomenon that is influenced by a variety of circumstances.
Employee satisfaction has been shown to have a major impact on employee performance, retention, and turnover. Locke (48) “a pleasant or good emotional state arising from the evaluation of one's employment or job experience” was characterized as employee satisfaction. Negative sentiments reflect dissatisfaction with one's job. The positive sentiments that an employee has about their work are what constitute employee satisfaction.
A company's ability to succeed depends critically on the happiness of its employees. Low staff turnover is associated with high levels of employee satisfaction. Keeping employees happy is thus a top priority for any organization. Amidst economic downturns like the one we're experiencing, employers appear to be ignoring a well-known reality about management: managers know this (49).
The level of employee performance in the company grew as a direct result of the rise in employee happiness. The workers will be pleased and motivated about their employment if they are satisfied with the incentives they are receiving. These benefits will boost their performance if they are satisfied with the awards they are getting (50).
H10: Employee satisfaction creates a positive impact on employee's performance.
Employee performance
The term “performance” refers to the result that knowledgeable individuals working in a certain environment are able to produce. The productivity and production of an individual as a direct consequence of their progress is referred to as that person's employee performance. The effectiveness of an organization is directly proportional to the performance of its employees. When conducting a performance review of an employee, the things that the individual does and does not do are considered. An employee's performance is evaluated based on the quality and quantity of their production, their level of attendance at work, how accommodating and helpful they are, and how quickly their output is completed. The findings of an investigation into individual performance, which was carried out by, suggest that it is impossible to verify individual performance (51). In addition to this, he claims that if an employee's performance can be measured, then employers have the ability to provide direct bonuses and incentives depending on the individual's level of success.
Companies will go to tremendous efforts to ensure that their clients are happy, but they will not go to the same measures to ensure that their staff are happy. On the other side, customers won't be happy until and until staff members are pleased both before and after they place their orders. Because if workers are content, they will put in more effort, ultimately leading to contentment on the part of the company's clients.
When employees are inspired, they put more effort into their work, which leads to an increase in their performance as a result of their motivation (52).
The quality of a person's work is strongly related to how satisfied they are with their job. Employees who are satisfied with their occupations are more likely to have a positive outlook on their work, which in turn helps them remain motivated while they are at work.
The ability of an organization to achieve its objectives is strongly linked to the performance of its workforce (53). To some extent, one's professional values, level of commitment to one's work, and ability to contribute to a cohesive workplace environment may all be markers of this characteristic. In this context, both quantity and quality must be taken into account. Additionally, it takes into consideration the output in terms of timeliness and attendance, as well as the efficiency and effectiveness of the job accomplished.
An person or a group's ability to effectively do a task that has been defined and assessed by a supervisor in a firm is referred to as “employee performance”. Standards must be met while using resources in an effective and efficient manner in a changing environment, which calls for adherence to previously specified and accepted standards (54).
Research methodology
In order to understand the nature of the link between the variables that are the subject of the understudy, a hypothesis study was used in this research. The human resources departments of the various private small family businesses provided the data of their workers, which were then used in this study. The decision to go with private, smaller family businesses was made because these establishments do not provide long-term employment opportunities as public or government-owned companies do. Because of this, they need to place a greater emphasis on the atmosphere of their workplace and the rewards they provide. In this way, businesses will have a better chance of keeping their important staff members in the long term.
The correlational method of inquiry was used for this study since it needed to test hypotheses on the relationships between the different variables. The fieldwork for this study was carried out in its natural setting. Because of this, the research context will be seen as one that was not artificially created. Regarding the completion of the questionnaires, this study has a low level of influence from the researchers toward the participants. Because the data for this research comes from individuals who work for small family businesses, the person serves as the unit of analysis for this particular study. For the purpose of this study, the researcher used a technique known as a cross-sectional study. It entails the investigation of a whole population or a representative sample of the population at a certain instant in time.
In order to obtain data from the staff members working at these small family businesses, the approach of purposive sampling is used. The term “judgmental sampling” may also be used to refer to this procedure. The researcher may be able to obtain data from the responder who is the best fit for the topic at hand, which is one of the reasons why this approach was selected.
The demographic framework for this study is the employee's attendance register, and the way that data is obtained for this research study is via the use of the register. In some companies, the researcher was the one who gathered the data. While in other instances the information is gathered with the assistance of pertinent friends in the proper settings.
Empirical settings and data collection
These investigations were carried out on workers of various private small family businesses in the province of Punjab which's complete data is given in the Table 1. Four hundred questionnaires were sent out to those employees, and roughly 270 questionnaires were returned, resulting in a response rate of fifty-five percent. In order to conduct this research, a trustworthy and comprehensive questionnaire was used. There was a total of 250 replies included for the study, out of which 20 surveys had information that was either missing or incorrect. The demographic profile of the respondents is provided further down.
Table 1
| Demographic profile of the respondents | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Subdivision | Frequency | Percentage |
| Marital status | Married | 75 | 30 |
| Un-married | 175 | 70 | |
| Currently held position | Senior Manager | 05 | 2 |
| Manager | 13 | 5.2 | |
| Assistant Manager | 25 | 10 | |
| Officer | 40 | 16 | |
| Supervisor | 70 | 28 | |
| Worker | 97 | 38.8 | |
| Age | Below 25 years | 86 | 34.4 |
| 25–30 | 70 | 28 | |
| 31–35 | 37 | 14.8 | |
| 36–40 | 30 | 12 | |
| 40 and above | 27 | 10.8 | |
| Education | Intermediate | 70 | 28 |
| Bachelors | 130 | 52 | |
| Masters | 40 | 16 | |
| M.Phil | 10 | 4 | |
| Phd | 0 | 0 | |
| Experience | Below 5 years | 150 | 60 |
| 6–10 years | 57 | 22.8 | |
| 11–15 years | 28 | 11.2 | |
| 16–20 years | 10 | 4 | |
| Above 20 years | 5 | 2 | |
| Departments | Marketing | 50 | 20 |
| Finance | 50 | 20 | |
| Supply chain | 50 | 20 | |
| Human resources | 50 | 20 | |
| Information echnology | 50 | 20 |
Demographic profile of the respondents.
The respondents were employees who worked for a variety of different small companies. The data were acquired both during and after the pandemic scenario via the use of a variety of resources in an effort to minimize human interaction to the greatest extent feasible. To approach our target respondents, we used the attendance register maintained by the concerned organization's human resource office, which served as a sampling framework for this study. Every privately held business has various departments, including marketing, sales, finance, supply chain management, human resources, and information technology. As a result, we shall use a methodology known as Stratified Sampling. We may be able to collect data from a representative number of workers in each division if we proceed in this manner.
Measure and methods
Instrument
This research will employ the Mueller-McCloskey Satisfaction Scale (MMSS), created in for social and psychological rewards (1990). This scale has been adjusted and adapted for use in this research of small family businesses' workers since it was originally created to measure nurse employees' satisfaction with their jobs (55). While for measuring the moderating variables which are employee motivation and satisfaction and dependent variable which is an employee performance the scales are adapted and then significantly modified from the research studies of Tremblay et al. (56), Probst (57), and Ramdani et al. (58), respectively. The complete measurement model is run and applied to test the effectiveness of this modified scale and reliability and validity of this instrument is checked as whole in a pooled confirmatory factor analysis test.
Confirmatory factor analysis
In order to get reliable and exact answers for all variables, a confirmatory factor analysis must be performed. A pooled CFA analysis will be used in this investigation. To reach the desired level of model fitness, it simultaneously runs all of the latent variables. Since the pooled CFA approach runs all the latent variables concurrently, it is more efficient than Individual CFA (59, 60).
As per the information given in Table 2 the model fit indices show an acceptable fit between the data and the proposed measurement model. The values of the Comparative Fit Index (CFI = 0.938), Root Mean Error of Approximation (RMSEA = 0.049). Chi-square to Degree of Freedom Ratio (x2/df = 1.590) are all meeting the cut-off criteria, so the values of the fitness indices meet the excellent standards for model fitness (64–66).
Table 2
| Pooled CFA model fitness tests | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of category | Name of index | Index full name | Value in analysis | Acceptable value | References |
| Absolute fit | RMSEA | Root mean square of error approximation | 0.070 | >0.06 | (61) |
| Incremental fit | CFI | Comparative fit index | 0.915 | <0.95 | (62) |
| Parsimonious fit | Chisq/df | Chi square/degrees of freedom | 2.534 | <3 | (63) |
Pooled CFA model fitness tests.
Pooled CFA Model Fitness TestsAfter running the pooled CFA, it is also necessary to check and verify each item's reliability for further research. CFA of this study's data was used to measure reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The reliability of the measurement scales was measured with composite reliability, which is preferred to report a scale's reliability (67), a widely used indicator. As per the Table 3 the reliability and convergent validity are accurate and fine because the factor loading of each item is grather than 0.5 which shows the convergent validity of the scale is sufficient and also the combine composite reliability is also above or equal to 0.7 which shows that reliability of the scale is also fine.
Table 3
| Pooled confirmatory factor analysis (independent, mediating, and dependent variable) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scale | Items | Factor loadings | Scale reliability |
| Social rewards | The firm provides opportunities for social contact at work. | 0.655 | 0.749 |
| The firm provides opportunities for social contact with your colleagues after work. | 0.831 | ||
| Firm's administration provides opportunities to interact with other disciplines. | 0.859 | ||
| Firm's administration provides opportunities to interact with knowledgeable resource. | 0.653 | ||
| Psychological rewards | You were admired by your immediate supervisor. | 0.614 | 0.700 |
| You have received recognition for your work from superiors. | 0.676 | ||
| You have received recognition for your work from peers. | 0.596 | ||
| You have received a fair amount of encouragement and positive feedback on your work. | 0.889 | ||
| You have given control over your work setting. | 0.729 | ||
| Employee motivation | You have given opportunities for career advancement. | 0.776 | 0.784 |
| You have a given amount of responsibility. | 0.778 | ||
| You have given control of your work conditions. | 0.805 | ||
| Employee satisfaction | I am very satisfied with my organization policies and practices. | 0.437 | 0.708 |
| I am very satisfied with the social status which my organizations provide to me. | 0.761 | ||
| I am very satisfied with the overall compensation which my organizations provide to me. | 0.875 | ||
| I am very satisfied with the level of responsibility which my organizations provide to me. | 0.759 | ||
| Employee performance | My performance is better than that of my colleagues with similar qualifications. | 0.732 | 0.803 |
| I am satisfied with my performance because it's mostly good. | 0.865 | ||
| My performance is better than that of bankers with similar qualifications in other banks. | 0.843 | ||
| I would like to perform best for my organization | 0.775 | ||
Pooled confirmatory factor analysis (independent, mediating, and dependent variable).
If the measuring scales are different from other measures, they are said to have discriminant validity. HTM analysis was used to test discriminant validity and found that 0.850 was the cut-off for tight discriminant validity and 0.900 the cut-off for liberal discriminant validity (68). Because all of the assessment scales utilized in our research vary from each other, the data used in our study meets discriminant validity standards as per the data given in Table 4 and is eligible for further investigation.
Table 4
| HTMT analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social rewards | Psychological rewards | Employee motivation | Employee satisfaction | Employee performance | |
| Social rewards | |||||
| Psychological rewards | 0.048 | ||||
| Employee motivation | 0.274 | 0.037 | |||
| Employee satisfaction | 0.259 | 0.107 | 0.406 | ||
| Employee performance | 0.293 | 0.051 | 0.495 | 0.418 |
HTMT analysis.
The shades indicates that the variables are the same and according to HTMT analysis values cannot exist or mention for the same variables.
Structural equation modeling
Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used in the Structural model to test the hypotheses, using AMOS 24. As the proposed model contains mediation, the SEM technique was used to analyze all of the paths simultaneously (65, 69, 70). The model fit indices for the structural model are meeting the acceptance criteria as per the information given in Table 5.
Table 5
| SEM, model fitness tests | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of category | Name of index | Index full name | Value in analysis | Acceptable value | References |
| Absolute fit | RMSEA | Root mean square of error approximation | 0.080 | >0.06 | (61) |
| Incremental fit | CFI | Comparative fit index | 0.935 | <0.95 | (62) |
| parsimonious fit | Chisq/df | Chi square/degrees of freedom | 1.534 | <3 | (63) |
SEM, model fitness tests.
Hypothesis testing
The results of the direct effects in structural model are shown in the Table 6.
Table 6
| Hypothesis | Causal path | P-value | Standardized estimated |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Social rewards → Employee performance | 0.685 | −0.019 |
| H5 | Psychological rewards → Employee performance | 0.001 | 0.347 |
| H9 | Employee motivation → Employee performance | 0.001 | 0.329 |
| H10 | Employee satisfaction → Employee performance | 0.001 | 0.243 |
Results of structural model: direct effects.
The SEM statistics show that H1(Social Rewards → Employee Performance) is rejected on the grounds of significance level, as the SEM results show that the P-values of this hypothesis is not significant. These results suggest that social rewards do not have a direct significant positive impact on employee performance. While H5(Psychological Rewards → Employee Performance), H9(Employee Motivation → Employee Performance), H10(Employee Satisfaction → Employee Performance) are accepted on the grounds of significance level, as the SEM results show that the P-values of these hypotheses are significant. These results suggest that these variables have a direct significant positive impact on employee performance.
The results of indirect hypothesis which are shown in Table 7 depicts the complete picture of this research study. The study showed that H2 (Social Rewards → Employee Motivation → Employee performance, β = 0.026, P= 0.082) is insignificant because the P-value is more than 0.05. It also suggests that when organizations provide social rewards to their valuable employees, it does not have any kind of significant impact on the performance of their employees while mediated through employee motivation.
Table 7
| Results of structural model: indirect effects | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | Causal path | Lower bound | Upper bound | P-value | Standardized estimated |
| H2 | Social rewards → Employee motivation → Employee performance | 0.001 | 0.057 | 0.082 | 0.026 |
| H3 | Social rewards → Employee satisfaction → Employee performance | −0.04 | −0.001 | 0.088 | −0.017 |
| H4 | Social rewards → Employee satisfaction → Employee motivation → Employee performance | −0.018 | 0.000 | 0.09 | −0.023 |
| H6 | Psychological rewards → Employee motivation → Employee performance | 0.033 | 0.13 | 0.005 | 0.053 |
| H7 | Psychological rewards → Employee satisfaction → Employee performance | 0.03 | 0.118 | 0.001 | 0.044 |
| H8 | Psychological rewards → Employee satisfaction → Employee motivation → Employee performance | 0.014 | 0.054 | 0.001 | 0.063 |
Results of structural model: indirect effects.
The study showed that H3 (Social Rewards → Employee Satisfaction → Employee performance, β = −0.017, P= 0.088) is also insignificant and suggests that when organizations provide social rewards to their valuable employees, it does not have any kind of significant impact on the performance of their employees while mediated through employee satisfaction.
For another hypothesis which is H4 (Social Rewards → Employee Satisfaction → Employee Motivation → Employee performance, β = −0.023, P= 0.09) is also insignificant and suggests that when organizations provide social rewards to their valuable employees, it does not have any kind of significant impact on the performance of their employees while mediated through employee satisfaction and then employee motivation simultaneously.
The study showed that H6 (Psychological Rewards → Employee Motivation → Employee performance, β = 0.053, P= 0.005). This hypothesis is also significant because the P-value is <0.05. It suggests that when organizations provide psychological rewards to their valuable employees, it does have significantly positive impact on the performance of its employees while mediated through employee motivation.
The second hypothesis which is relevant to the psychological rewards is H7 (Psychological Rewards → Employee Satisfaction → Employee performance, β = 0.044, P= 0.001). This hypothesis is also significant because the P-value is <0.05. It suggests that when organizations provide psychological rewards to their valuable employees, it does have significantly positive impact on the performance of its employees while mediated through employee satisfaction.
For last hypothesis which is relevant to the psychological rewards is H8 which is determining the results of (Psychological Rewards → Employee Satisfaction → Employee Motivation → Employee performance, β = 0.001, P= 0.063). This hypothesis is also significant because the P-value is <0.05. It suggests that when organizations provide psychological rewards to their valuable employees, it does have significantly positive impact on the performance of its employees while mediated through employee satisfaction and then employee motivation.
Discussion
Small family businesses may secure the performance of their employees using psychological incentives while considering employee motivation and pleasure as a mediating component. Considering the findings of this research, we might say that organizations are still reeling from the financial toll that COVID-19 has taken. COVID-19 findings are supported by earlier investigations, despite the lack of COVID-19 circumstances (71, 72). Another study done by Ma et al. (73) suggests that psychological rewards played a vital role in changing employee behavior toward their organization. They remain loyal to their organizations and their performance continuously upsurges. It is also suggest by De Gieter et al. (74) and Hinds (75) that employee performance resulted through the enhanced employee satisfaction and motivation lead toward the low turnover ratio ensures they have a high level of employee performance, leading to customer satisfaction.
While looking into the results, the answers related to the social rewards are interesting as well as worth noting. The study suggests that the social rewards have insignificant impact on the employee performance while mediated through employee motivation and employee satisfaction. These kinds of results require more in-depth approach to understand the scenario in which the results are gathered. As discussed by Anderson (76), Berman et al. (77), Heerey (78), and Rademacher et al. (79) the social rewards could have a different impact on different respondents in a different geographical, economic and cultural scenario. Social rewards are considered as non-monetary rewards which could be considered as viable solution to boost the performance of employees in an organization while considering this fact that they are already receiving appropriate monetary benefits (80, 81). Introducing social rewards to enhance the employee performance through motivation and satisfaction, in presence of inappropriate monetary benefits could be considered as a non-functional approach in some cases.
Conclusion
It is concluded from the above discussion and findings that small family firms which could be considered as a basic and essential part of any countries' economy is primarily based upon the performance of its employees. If employees are unable to perform well then the organization will not be able to sustain its self in a longer run. It is imperative to keep employees happy and loyal with their organization to work more in the same organization (82), thus generating more productivity and successful work. To complete that kind of task, in a post COVID-19 scenario when organizations are still fighting to maintain sustainable financial stability to run the firm smoothly. They are somehow forced to evaluate the non-monetary rewards in connection with the employee performance due to their lack of financial stability. While the most discussed non-monetary rewards are the social and psychological rewards. According to this study findings, the psychological rewards will help the organizations keep their employee satisfied and motivated enough so they could perform really well for the organization (9, 11). While applying social rewards for the respondents with these psychographic and geographic credentials are not helpful at all. Investing any kind of resources which could include time or research to enhance employee performance will go in vain. It could be possible to apply social rewards in any other psychographic and geographic scenario with positive and significant results, which could lead toward a more accurate path that how the organizations could keep the performance of their employees elevated while considering different non-monetary rewards on their disposal (83).
Managerial implications of the study
This research might also be used to examine the behavior of huge corporations and organizations, such as schools, banks, and airlines. Managers will benefit from this information as they reexamine their management policies related to their employee's management. In order to improve productivity and increase employee loyalty, they may implement a more comprehensive and realistic non-monetary incentives system in their company. Manager, could learn more about the psychological incentives which are needed by the employees of their organizations through this research study. This study also provides guidance to the management of different organizations which have the employees belongs to the demographic profile of the respondents used for this study. In this way they could be able to apply more focus on providing the psychological incentives to its employees rather than focusing upon the social rewards, which according to this study don't have any positive impact on the employee performance through satisfaction or motivation.
Limitations of the study
Because this study was undertaken particularly for small family businesses in a single province, it is unable to be applied to other regions. The study's geographic scope might potentially be seen as a drawback. This research is also constrained by a lack of funding and time. It's also feasible that the findings might vary dramatically over a short period of time of COVID-19 pandemics. Because of their busy schedules, it's possible that workers won't be able to concentrate on this questionnaire. There's no way around it: this restriction is correct. Because of the extreme level of stress they are under in the COVID-19 scenario.
Additionally, they must take care of their personal and family affairs during these frantic times. As a result, gathering the study's data was a very difficult task. In this survey, participants fill out a questionnaire that has been validated, authenticated, and shown trustworthy. The majority of respondents said it was well-written and easy to grasp.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 21BGL047).
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because of the privacy of its respondents. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to MS, waqas_sadiq2011@hotmail.com.
Author contributions
MS, JH, and CH: conceptualization. MS and MA: data curation. MS and JH: formal analysis, validation, and writing—review and editing. CH and MA: methodology and supervision. MS, JH, and MA: writing—original draft. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
BrayfieldAHCrockettWH. Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychol Bull. (1955) 52:396. 10.1037/h0045899
2.
SatowKL. Social approval and helping. J Exp Soc Psychol. (1975) 11:501–9. 10.1016/0022-1031(75)90001-3
3.
ManzoorSRUllahHHussainMAhmadZM. Effect of teamwork on employee performance. Int J Learn Dev. (2011) 1:110–26. 10.5296/ijld.v1i1.1110
4.
LiHHameedJKhuhroRAAlbasherGAlqahtaniWSadiqMWet al. The impact of the economic corridor on economic stability: a double mediating role of environmental sustainability and sustainable development under the exceptional circumstances of COVID-19. Front Psychol. (2021) 11:634375. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.634375
5.
SchraederMJordanM. Managing performance: a practical perspective on managing employee performance. J Qual Participat. (2011) 34:4.
6.
AbdullahMIHuangDSarfrazMSadiqMW. Service innovation in human resource management during COVID-19: a study to enhance employee loyalty using intrinsic rewards. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:627659. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627659
7.
GantaVC. Motivation in the workplace to improve the employee performance. Int J Eng Technol Manage Appl Sci. (2014) 2:221–30.
8.
RobertsGE. Employee performance appraisal system participation: a technique that works. Public Pers Manage. (2003) 32:89–98. 10.1177/009102600303200105
9.
SadiqMWHameedJAbdullahMINomanSM. Service innovations in social media & blogging websites: enhancing customer's psychological engagement towards online environment friendly products. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica. (2020) 29:677. 10.24205/03276716.2020.873
10.
Sa'adahNRijantiT. The role of knowledge sharing, leader-member exchange (LMX) on organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance: an empirical study on public health center of Pati 1, Pati 2 and Trangkil in Central Java. Int J Soc Manage Stud. (2022) 3:112–31. 10.5555/ijosmas.v3i1.87
11.
SadiqWAbdullahIAslamKZulfiqarS. Engagement marketing: the innovative perspective to enhance the viewer's loyalty in social media and blogging e-commerce websites. Mark Manage Innovat. (2020) 1:149–66. 10.21272/mmi.2020.1-12
12.
SipersteinGNNorinsJMohlerA. “Social acceptance and attitude change,” in Jacobson JW, Mulick JA, Rojahn J, Handbook of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilitiesi. (New York, NY: Springer (2007). p. 133–154.
13.
PanagiotakopoulosA. The impact of employee learning on staff motivation in Greek small firms: the employees' perspective. Dev Learn Org Int J. (2013) 27:13–5. 10.1108/14777281311302030
14.
De RuyterKWetzelsMFeinbergR. Role stress in call centers: its effects on employee performance and satisfaction. J Interact Market. (2001) 15:23–35. 10.1002/dir.1008
15.
DavisG. Job satisfaction survey among employees in small businesses. J Small Bus Enterprise Dev. (2004) 11:495–503. 10.1108/14626000410567143
16.
PaaisMPattiruhuJR. Effect of motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on satisfaction and employee performance. J Asian Finance Econ Bus. (2020) 7:577–88. 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.577
17.
AmabileT. Componential Theory of Creativity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School (2011).
18.
AmabileTMPrattMG. The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: making progress, making meaning. Res Org Behav. (2016) 36:157–83. 10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
19.
AndersonBA. Social reward shapes attentional biases. Cogn Neurosci. (2016) 7:30–6. 10.1080/17588928.2015.1047823
20.
SadiqMWHuoCAl-RahmiWMAlturiseFAl-AdwanAS. Innovation in neighbourhood management web service: A precise initiative to augment audiences' interaction on social media. Front Psychol. (2012) 3435.
21.
HuddTMoscovitchDA. Reconnecting in the face of exclusion: individuals with high social anxiety may feel the push of social pain, but not the pull of social rewards. Cognit Ther Res. (2022) 46:420–35. 10.1007/s10608-021-10263-z
22.
MasonWASaxonSVSharpeLG. Preferential responses of young chimpanzees to food and social rewards. Psychol Rec. (1963) 13:341–5. 10.1007/BF03393535
23.
AbdullahMIHuangDSarfrazMNaseerJSadiqMW. Signifying the relationship between counterproductive work behavior and firm's performance: the mediating role of organizational culture. Bus Process Manage J. (2021). 10.1108/BPMJ-12-2020-0546
24.
MitchellGMcCambridgeJ. Recruitment, risks, rewards and regrets: senior researcher reflections on working with alcohol industry social aspects organisations. Drug Alcohol Rev. (2022) 41:27–35. 10.1111/dar.13342
25.
JarchoJMWyngaardenJBJohnstonCRQuarmleyMSmithDVCassidyCM. Substance abuse in emerging adults: the role of neuromelanin and ventral striatal response to social and monetary rewards. Brain Sci. (2022) 12:352. 10.3390/brainsci12030352
26.
RutaLFamàFIBernavaGMLeonardiETartariscoGFalzoneAet al. Reduced preference for social rewards in a novel tablet based task in young children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Scientific Reports. (2017) 7:1–8. 10.1038/s41598-017-03615-x
27.
TelzerEHJorgensenNAPrinsteinMJLindquistKA. Neurobiological sensitivity to social rewards and punishments moderates link between peer norms and adolescent risk taking. Child Dev. (2021) 92:731–45. 10.1111/cdev.13466
28.
MiaoQNewmanASunYXuL. What factors influence the organizational commitment of public sector employees in China? The role of extrinsic, intrinsic and social rewards. Int J Hum Resource Manage. (2013) 24:3262–80. 10.1080/09585192.2013.770783
29.
NewmanASheikhAZ. Organizational commitment in Chinese small-and medium-sized enterprises: the role of extrinsic, intrinsic and social rewards. Int J Hum Resource Manage. (2012) 23:349–67. 10.1080/09585192.2011.561229
30.
SugawaraSKTanakaSOkazakiSWatanabeKSadatoN. Social rewards enhance offline improvements in motor skill. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e48174. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048174
31.
GötzFMGoslingSDRentfrowPJ. Small effects: the indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci. (2022) 17:205–15. 10.1177/1745691620984483
32.
HuoCHameedJSadiqMWAlbasherGAlqahtaniW. Tourism, environment and hotel management: an innovative perspective to address modern trends in contemporary tourism management. Bus Process Manage J. (2021). 10.1108/BPMJ-12-2020-0543
33.
LiJQuJHuangQ. Why are some graduate entrepreneurs more innovative than others? The effect of human capital, psychological factor and entrepreneurial rewards on entrepreneurial innovativeness. Entrepreneurship Regional Dev. (2018) 30:479–501. 10.1080/08985626.2017.1406540
34.
SharmaDVermaV. Psychological and economic considerations of rewards programs. J Retail Consumer Serv. (2014) 21:924–32. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.08.010
35.
GkorezisPPetridouE. The effect of extrinsic rewards on public and private sector employees' psychological empowerment: a comparative approach. Int J Hum Resource Manage. (2012) 23:3596–612. 10.1080/09585192.2011.639025
36.
GkorezisPPetridouE. Employees' psychological empowerment via intrinsic and extrinsic rewards. Acad Health Care Manage J. (2008) 4:17–38.
37.
ChenGTjosvoldD. Shared rewards and goal interdependence for psychological safety among departments in China. Asia Pacific J Manage. (2012) 29:433–52. 10.1007/s10490-010-9201-0
38.
RenZZhangXSunYLiXHeMShiHet al. Relationships of professional identity and psychological reward satisfaction with subjective well-being among Chinese nurses. J Nurs Manag. (2021) 29:1508–16. 10.1111/jonm.13276
39.
GrantAM. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J Appl Psychol. (2008) 93:48. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
40.
LongL-RTuYWangH-JJiangL. The content of the threat matters: the differential effects of quantitative and qualitative job insecurity on different types of employee motivation. J Bus Psychol. (2022) 37:297–310. 10.1007/s10869-021-09746-3
41.
TumiNSHasanANKhalidJ. Impact of compensation, job enrichment and enlargement, and training on employee motivation. Bus Perspect Res. (2022) 10:121–39. 10.1177/2278533721995353
42.
ChikazheLNyakunuwaE. Promotion of perceived service quality through employee training and empowerment: the mediating role of employee motivation and internal communication. Serv Mark Q. (2022) 43:294–311. 10.1080/15332969.2021.1992560
43.
HajialiIKessiAMFBudiandrianiBPrihatinESufriMM. Determination of work motivation, leadership style, employee competence on job satisfaction and employee performance. Golden Ratio Hum Resource Manage. (2022) 2:57–69. 10.52970/grhrm.v2i1.160
44.
MegawatyMHamdatAAidaN. Examining linkage leadership style, employee commitment, work motivation, work climate on satisfaction and performance. Golden Ratio Hum Resource Manage. (2022) 2:01–14. 10.52970/grhrm.v2i1.86
45.
SetyowatiWSofingiA. Determinants of employee performance with work motivation as an intervening variable at the Semarang city search and rescue office. Aptisi Trans Manage. (2022) 6:19–29. 10.33050/atm.v6i1.1638
46.
Al-bawaiaEAlshuridehMObeidatBMasa'dehR. The impact of corporate culture and employee motivation on organization effectiveness in Jordanian banking sector. Academy of Strategic Management Journal (2022) 21:1–18.
47.
IbrahimMSaputraJAdamMYunusM. Organizational culture, employee motivation, workload, and employee performance: a mediating role of communication. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ. (2022) 19:54–61. 10.37394/23207.2022.19.6
48.
LockeEA. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook innovation in social media services. Internet Res.
49.
GregoryK. The importance of employee satisfaction. J Div Bus Inform Manage. (2011) 5:29–37.
50.
EskildsenJKDahlgaardJJ. A causal model for employee satisfaction. Total Qual Manage. (2000) 11:1081–94. 10.1080/095441200440340
51.
YangMHWengSSHsiaoPI. Measuring Blog Service of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2014).
52.
AsbariMHidayatDDPurwantoA. Managing employee performance: from leadership to readiness for change. Int J Soc Manage Stud. (2021) 2:74–85.
53.
VenkatramanNRamanujamV. Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Acad Manage Rev. (1986) 11:801–14. 10.2307/258398
54.
NgwaWTAdelekeBSAgbaezeEKGhasiNCImhanrenialenaBO. Effect of reward system on employee performance among selected manufacturing firms in the Litoral region of Cameroon. Acad Strat Manage J. (2019) 18:1–16.
55.
MuellerCWMcCloskeyP. McCloskey/Mueller satisfaction scale. Nurs Res. (1990) 39:113–7. 10.1097/00006199-199003000-00014
56.
TremblayMABlanchardCMTaylorSPelletierLGVilleneuveM. Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: its value for organizational psychology research. Can J Behav Sci. (2009) 41:213. 10.1037/a0015167
57.
ProbstTM. Development and validation of the job security index and the job security satisfaction scale: a classical test theory and IRT approach. J Occup Organ Psychol. (2003) 76:451–67. 10.1348/096317903322591587
58.
RamdaniZMarlianiRRahmanAA. The individual work performance scale: a psychometric study and its application for employee performance. Hum Soc Sci Rev. (2019) 7:405–14. 10.18510/hssr.2019.7545
59.
AfthanorhanWAhmadSMamatI. Pooled confirmatory factor analysis (PCFA) using structural equation modeling on volunteerism program: a step by step approach. Int J Asian Soc Sci. (2014) 4:642–53.
60.
ChongEENazimAAhmadSB. A comparison between individual confirmatory factor analysis and pooled confirmatory factor analysis: an analysis of library service quality, a case study at a public university in Terengganu. Int J Eng Sci Innovat Technol. (2014) 3:110–6.
61.
BrowneMWCudeckR. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Ed. (1993) 154:136–136.
62.
BentlerPM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. (1990) 107:238. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
63.
HuLBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model Multidisc J. (1999) 6:1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
64.
AndersonRBabinBBlackWHairJ. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global PERSPECTIVE. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall (2010).
65.
HoeSL. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. J Appl Quant Methods. (2008) 3:76–83.
66.
LomaxRGSchumackerRE. A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Psychology Press (2004).
67.
NetemeyerRGBeardenWOSharmaS. Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (2003).
68.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. (2015) 43:115–35. 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
69.
AlavifarAKarimimalayerMAnuarMK. Structural equation modeling vs multiple regression. Eng Sci Technol Int J. (2012) 2:326–9.
70.
IacobucciDSaldanhaNDengX. A meditation on mediation: evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. J Consum Psychol. (2007) 17:139–53. 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70020-7
71.
LuHWhileAEBarriballKL. Job satisfaction among nurses: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. (2005) 42:211–27. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.003
72.
DignaniLToccaceliA. Nurses and job satisfaction: results of an Italian survey. J US China Public Adm. (2013) 10:379–87.
73.
MaC-CSamuelsMEAlexanderJW. Factors that influence nurses' job satisfaction. J Nurs Adm. (2003) 33:293–9. 10.1097/00005110-200305000-00005
74.
De GieterSDe CoomanRPepermansRJegersM. Manage through rewards, not only through pay: establishing the Psychological Reward Satisfaction Scale (PReSS). Reward Manage Facts Trends Europe. (2008) 2008:97–117.
75.
HindsJ. Exploring the psychological rewards of a wilderness experience: an interpretive phenomenological analysis. Hum Psychol. (2011) 39:189–205. 10.1080/08873267.2011.567132
76.
AndersonJR. Social stimuli and social rewards in primate learning and cognition. Behav Processes. (1998) 42:159–75. 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00074-0
77.
BermanJZLevineEEBaraschASmallDA. The Braggart's dilemma: on the social rewards and penalties of advertising prosocial behavior. J Mark Res. (2015) 52:90–104. 10.1509/jmr.14.0002
78.
HeereyEA. Learning from social rewards predicts individual differences in self-reported social ability. J Exp Psychol Gen. (2014) 143:332. 10.1037/a0031511
79.
RademacherLKrachSKohlsGIrmakAGründerGSpreckelmeyerKN. Dissociation of neural networks for anticipation and consumption of monetary and social rewards. Neuroimage. (2010) 49:3276–85. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.089
80.
EthridgePWeinbergA. Psychometric properties of neural responses to monetary and social rewards across development. Int J Psychophysiol. (2018) 132:311–22. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.011
81.
SmithDVClitheroJABoltuckSEHuettelSA. Functional connectivity with ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects subjective value for social rewards. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. (2014) 9:2017–25. 10.1093/scan/nsu005
82.
BakertzisEMyloniB. Profession as a major drive of work engagement and its effects on job performance among healthcare employees in Greece: a comparative analysis among doctors, nurses and administrative staff. Health Serv Manage Res. (2020) 34:80–91. 10.1177/0951484820943592
83.
BhattacharyaSMukherjeeP. Rewards as a key to employee engagement: a comparative study on IT professionals. ASBM J Manage. (2009) 2:160.
Summary
Keywords
social rewards, psychological rewards, small family firms, employee satisfaction, service innovation
Citation
Sadiq MW, Hameed J, Huo C and Abdullah MI (2022) Service innovation in small neighborhood family firms: An advanced approach to enhance employee's performance through social and psychological rewards. Front. Public Health 10:984848. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.984848
Received
02 July 2022
Accepted
21 July 2022
Published
12 August 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Francesca Di Virgilio, University of Molise, Italy
Reviewed by
R. M. Ammar Zahid, Yunnan Technology and Business University, China; Zahid Hussain, Qilu University of Technology, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Sadiq, Hameed, Huo and Abdullah.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Muhammad Waqas Sadiq waqas_sadiq2011@hotmail.comChunhui Huo robinhch@126.com
This article was submitted to Occupational Health and Safety, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.