You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 28 February 2025

Sec. Children and Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1433523

Association of communication methods and frequency with BMI among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from A-CHILD study

  • Department of Public Health, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Article metrics

View details

1,3k

Views

323

Downloads

Abstract

Objective:

Little is known about the differential impact of communication methods and BMI. Hence, this study aims to examine the association of in-person and online communication with BMI among 13–14-year-old students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method:

This is a cross-sectional study which used data from the Adachi Child Health Impact of Living Difficulty study among Junior High School students in Adachi City, Tokyo in 2022(N = 3,178). A questionnaire was used to assess communication methods and frequency. BMI was categorized into overweight and obesity (≥ + 1SD), normal weight (−1SD to <+1SD) and underweight (<−1SD) based on WHO standard. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the association between communication methods and BMI.

Results:

Reduced in-person communication frequency was associated with 94% higher risk of overweight and obese (RRR = 1.94, 95%CI; 1.38, 2.72) while increased online communication frequency was associated with 46% increased risk (RRR = 1.46, 95%CI; 1.10, 1.95). When online and in-person communications were adjusted simultaneously, only reduced in-person communication frequency was associated with a high risk of overweight and obese (RRR = 1.56, 95%CI; 1.09, 2.25). When stratified by gender, a similar trend was observed among females (RRR = 2.12, 95%CI; 1.20, 3.73), but not in males.

Conclusion:

Reduced in-person communication frequency was associated with higher risk of overweight and obesity, especially among females, during COVID-19 in Japan.

Introduction

The substantial increase in overweight and obesity prevalence among children and adults globally has become a public health issue of great concern. It is predicted that approximately 51% of people globally will be living with overweight or obesity by 2035 if action is not taken (1). Adolescent obesity has particularly been on the rise in recent times. As at 2022, 40 million adolescents and 39 million children worldwide were said to be obese (2). A systematic review on large cohorts showed that 80% of adolescents who are obese remain obese in adulthood (3). Unhealthy eating, lack of physical activity, stress and poor sleep quality which are risk factors for overweight and obesity were noticed to be aggravated during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in higher prevalence (4).

The COVID-19 pandemic, which induced school closures, lockdowns, movement restrictions and self-isolation, resulted in limited opportunity to engage in face-to face interactions. Adolescents resorted to using social media and other digital platforms to make up for the lack of social interactions and this led to a general increase in online communication (5). Tokyo prefecture in Japan, which is highly populated, had to close down schools earlier than most prefectures to control the spread of the COVID-19 (6). To allow continuity of learning despite the closure of schools, the government provided each child with personal computers (6). In 2021, the Tokyo metropolitan government even funded one-on-one online lessons in all public high schools in Tokyo (7). This new normal of online learning and digital interactions will encourage children and adolescents to spend more time on their phones and computers, resulting in a drastic reduction in face-to face interaction among their peers.

Face-to-face networks and interactions have been revealed to be advantageous in promoting healthy behaviors and lowering BMI (8). Also, literature has established that in the presence of their peers, children are influenced to engage more in physical activity (9). Face-to-face communication is beneficial in improving the health of adolescents, but in this era of alarming social media usage, social interactions may not be limited to face-to-face.

Over the years, digitalization has resulted in many adolescents turning to online platforms to interact. Existing research has suggested that online communication has helped adolescents build stronger peer relationships (10). Other studies done have however shown that excessive use of online platforms as means of communicating has led to poor health outcomes (11). A study done in China in 2017 confirmed that problematic smartphone use among primary and high schools students was positively associated with obesity (12). These are studies conducted in pre-pandemic era. There are however limited studies on its impact on BMI during the pandemic.

Interestingly, gender differences have been noticed to modify the effect online and in-person communications have on BMI. In 2015, a population-based study among adolescents in Canada suggested that heavy social media use was associated with higher BMI among males than females (13). A previous study done in Canada observed that reduced face-to-face social interaction was associated with abdominal and general obesity among women but lower risk of obesity among men (14). Furthermore, in this era where both online and in-person of communication are of great essence for daily interactions, it is important to comprehensively understand how both forms of communication are simultaneously associated with BMI. This will help in attaining a healthy balance with respect to the frequency of both forms of communication and provide a better picture of the effect of both communication types on the weight of children and adolescents. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has been found to simultaneously examine the association of online and in-person communication. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the association between online and in-person communication on BMI among Junior High School students, and to stratify this association by gender.

Materials and methods

Sample

This current study is a cross-sectional study using data from the Adachi Child Health Impact of Living Difficulty (A-CHILD) study, which is representative of a regional population. The first wave of this study was started in 2015 as a complete-sample longitudinal study. It targeted first grade students in all 69 elementary schools in Adachi City in Tokyo and a follow up survey was conducted in 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 for children who participated in the first survey.

In 2022, the follow up survey was conducted among second grade junior high school students (aged 13–14 years). For this survey, questionnaires were distributed among students and their caregivers (n = 4,396). The questionnaires, which were completed at home, were returned to school and submitted anonymously. Among the children who were given the questionnaires, 846 (19.2% of respondents) did not provide informed consent, thus these respondents were excluded from the study. After excluding responses with invalid data and missing values (n = 372), and linking with the school health checkup data, the final sample size used for the analysis was 3,178. The flowchart is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Flowchart.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the National Center for Child Health and Development (Approval number: 1147) and Tokyo Medical and Dental University (Approval number: M2016-284).

Measurements

Communication methods and frequency

The communication methods investigated were online and in-person communication. To examine the frequency of in-person communication, students were asked how often they had communicated with their friends in-person during the past month (excluding greetings). They were provided the following options as answers: 1 = every day, 2 = 4–6 days/week, 3 = 2–3 days/week, 4 = 0-1 day/week. For online communication, students were asked how often they had called their friends via online platforms over the past month. Similarly, they were provided the following options: 1 = every day, 2 = 4–6 days/week, 3 = 2–3 days/week, 4 = 0–1 day/week. In the final analysis, the categories 0–1 day/week and 2–3 days/week were combined to form a new category, 0–3 days/week for both online communication and in-person communication based on the distributions. This simplified categorization was designed to facilitate easier recall and reporting of communication frequencies among adolescent participants.

Body mass index (BMI)

The weight and height of the students were obtained in school by teachers during a mandatory school health checkup, following standardized protocol as outlined by the Japanese Society of School Health (15). Using a portable stadiometer, height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm. Without shoes and in light clothing, weight was also measured to the nearest 0.1 kg on a digital scale. BMI, which was the outcome variable, was calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms (kg) by the square of the height in meters (m) and converted to z-score based on WHO standard (16). BMI was categorized into three groups as follows: overweight and obesity (≥ +1SD), normal weight (-1SD to < +1SD) and underweight (< -1SD).

Covariates

Information on the demographic characteristics of participants such as gender of students (male and female) and household income were obtained using self-reported questionnaires. Household income was categorized into <3,000,000 JPY, 3,000,000 JPY to 6,000,000 JPY, 6,000,000 JPY to10,000,000 JPY and > 10,000,000 JPY (1 USD ~ 132 JPY). The students were asked to report on the number of close friends they had inside of their class and outside of their class. For both questions, the response options were grouped into 0–4 friends, 5–9 friends and 10 or more friends based on distribution. This variable was made a covariate because social network size has been seen to be associated with physical activity and obesity (17), as well as communication (18). Previous studies have established that participation in sports club or extra-curricular activities is associated with physical fitness and BMI (19) and also influences communication competence (20). Involvement in athletic or sports club was therefore included as a covariate. Frequency of physical activity was also made a covariate. The Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) was used to evaluate depressive symptoms among students (21). Participants completed a 4-point Likert scale in response to 9 items with responses nearly every day, more than half the days, several days and not at all. The total PHQ-A score which could range from 0 to 27 were grouped into 0–4 for no or minimal depressive symptoms, 5–14 for mild to moderate depressive symptoms, 15–19 for moderate to severe depressive symptoms and 20–27 for severe depressive symptoms. Depression, which is associated with BMI (22) is also with communication (23) and so was made a covariate.

To assess the level of psychological distress among caregivers, the Japanese version of the K-6 scale was used (24). They were asked to answer a 6-item set of questions based on their experiences over the past 30 days using a 5-point Likert scale. The responses were summed up to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 24 and categorized as 0–4, 5–12 and 13–24, depicting low, moderate and high levels of psychological distress, respectively. Caregivers also had to report the absence or presence of maternal and paternal illness. Parental mental and physical health were made covariates because previous studies have established that the mental and physical health status of parents influence the BMI of their children (25). Literature has also shown that parental mental health impacts the mental health of children which subsequently affects communication skills (26). The physical health of parents has also been shown to influence communication skills among children (27). In addition, the order of birth of children was made a covariate due to previous research highlighting the association between birth order and BMI (28) and also birth order and communication (29). To assess their birth order, each child was asked whether they had an older sibling and a younger sibling. For both questions, the options given were ‘yes’ and ‘no’. The data from these responses were recoded and each child was categorized into only child (having no siblings), firstborn, middle born and last born. Finally, caregivers were asked if their children had been admitted at the hospital over the past 1 year. They answered, ‘yes’ or ‘no’. They were also asked if they had been absent from school since they entered their current grade with answer options ‘yes’, ‘no’ and ‘I do not know’. According to previous studies, BMI of children is associated with chronic illnesses (30) which in turn affects school attendance. School absenteeism has also been found to affect communication among peers (31). Hence, the covariates absence from school and previous hospital admissions were included.

Statistical analysis

Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of online communication and in-person communication with BMI, using the reference categories ‘every day’ for in-person communication and ‘0–3 days/week’ for online communication. The covariates (gender of children, household income, close friends inside and outside the classroom, membership in athletics or sports club, frequency of exercise, PHQ-A score of children, children’s birth order, K-6 score of caregivers, maternal and paternal illness, history of hospital admission and absence from school) were included in the adjusted model. Lastly, the association was further stratified by the children’s gender (male and female) and was also adjusted for using all other covariates. All analyses were performed using the computer software STATA 16 for MacOS (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the caregivers and children. Among the three BMI categories, children who were overweight and obese were less likely to communicate in-person with their friends, (n = 54, 10.1%), less likely to be members of athletics and sports clubs, (n = 234, 43.8%), more likely to be the only child of their parents, (n = 133, 24.9%) and more likely to be male, (n = 323, 60.5%). Also, children from households with low income were more likely to be obese, (n = 85, 15.9%).

Table 1

BMI Category p-value
Demographic characteristics Underweight (N = 514, 16.2%) Normal weight
(N = 2,130, 67.0%)
Overweight and obesity
(N = 534, 16.8%)
In-person communication with friends
Everyday 346 (67.3%) 1,496 (70.2%) 342 (64.0%) <0.001*
4–6 days/week 144 (28.0%) 512 (24.0%) 138 (25.8%)
0–3 days/week 24 (4.7%) 122 (5.7%) 54 (10.1%)
Online communication with friends
Everyday 39(7.6%) 172(8.1%) 44 (8.2%) 0.12
4–6 days/week 60(11.7%) 209(9.8%) 73 (13.7%)
0–3 days/week 415(80.7%) 1,749(82.1%) 417(78.1%)
Membership in athletic and sports club
Yes 323(62.8%) 1,409 (66.2%) 298 (55.8%) <0.001*
No 186(36.2%) 705 (33.1%) 234 (43.8%)
Missing 5(1.0%) 16 (0.8%) 2 (0.4%)
Frequency of exercise
Rarely 186(36.2%) 693 (32.5%) 191 (35.8%) 0.16
1–2 times/week 149(29.0%) 597 (28.0%) 164 (30.7%)
3–4 times/week 82(16.0%) 373 (17.5%) 89 (16.7%)
5–6 times/week 51(9.9%) 264 (12.4%) 49 (9.2%)
Everyday 41(8.0%) 193 (9.1%) 40 (7.5%)
Missing 5(1.0) 10 (0.5%) 1 (0.2%)
Close friends in the same class
0–4 167 (32.5%) 753 (35.4%) 180 (33.7%) 0.06
5–9 200 (38.9%) 719 (33.8%) 163 (30.5%)
10+ 141 (27.4%) 638 (30.0%) 186 (34.8%)
Missing 6 (1.2%) 20 (0.9%) 5 (0.9%)
Close friends outside the same class
0–4 167 (32.5%) 697 (32.7%) 188 (35.2%) 0.56
5–9 183 (35.6%) 692 (32.5%) 173 (32.4%)
10+ 158 (30.7%) 716 (33.6%) 164 (30.7%)
Missing 6 (1.2%) 25 (1.2%) 9 (1.7%)
Absence from school
Yes 283 (55.1%) 1,128 (53.0%) 320 (59.9%) 0.19
No 225 (43.8%) 979 (46.0%) 208 (39.0%)
I do not know 5 (1.0%) 20 (0.9%) 5 (0.9%)
Missing 1 (0.2%) 3 (0.1%) 1 (0.2%)
Hospital admission
Yes 20 (3.9%) 148 (7.0%) 41 (7.7%) 0.07
No 493 (95.9%) 1,977 (92.8%) 493 (92.3%)
Missing 1 (0.2%) 5 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)
PHQ-A Score
0–4 290 (56.4%) 1,029 (48.3%) 256 (47.9%) 0.03
5–14 196 (38.1%) 899 (42.2%) 227 (42.5%)
15–19 18 (3.5%) 120 (5.6%) 33 (6.2%)
20+ 9 (1.8%) 79 (3.7%) 18 (3.4%)
Missing 1 (0.2%) 3 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%)
Birth order
Only child 84 (16.3%) 380 (17.8%) 133 (24.9%) 0.01*
Firstborn 182 (35.4%) 706 (33.2%) 156 (29.2%)
Middle born 68 (13.2%) 294 (13.8%) 61 (11.4%)
Last born 180 (35.0%) 750 (35.2%) 184 (34.5%)
Gender
Male 309 (60.1%) 995 (46.7%) 323 (60.5%) <0.001*
Female 205 (39.9%) 1,135 (53.3%) 211 (39.5%)
Maternal illness
Absent 144 (28.0%) 575 (27.0%) 150 (28.1%) 0.82
Present 370 (72.0%) 1,555 (73.0%) 384 (71.9%)
Paternal illness
Absent 159 (30.9%) 647 (30.4%) 153 (28.7%) 0.57
Present 332 (64.6%) 1,358 (63.8%) 355 (66.5%)
Missing 23 (4.5%) 125 (5.9%) 26 (4.9%)
Caregiver’s K6 score
0–4 322 (62.7%) 1,353 (63.5%) 316 (59.2%) 0.13
5–12 148 (28.8%) 608 (28.5%) 171 (32.0)
13–24 35 (6.8%) 119 (5.6%) 41 (7.7%)
Missing 9 (1.8%) 50 (2.4%) 6 (1.1%)
Income
<3,000,000 JPY 48 (9.3%) 224 (10.5%) 85 (15.9%) 0.001*
3,000,000-6,000,000 JPY 131 (25.5%) 556 (26.1%) 175 (32.8%)
6,000,000 - 10,000,000 JPY 195 (37.9%) 734 (34.5%) 157 (29.4%)
>10,000,000 JPY 58 (11.3%) 283 (13.3%) 41 (7.7%)
Missing 82 (16.0%) 333 (15.6%) 76 (14.2%)

Demographic characteristics of participants (N = 3,178).

*indicates p-value < 0.05.

Table 2 shows the association between online and in-person communication. There was inconsistent association between online communication and in-person communication, for example, online communication for every day had higher percentage for those who communicated in-person every day (9.6%) and 0-3 days/week (7.0%), while 4–6 days/week group showed lower percentage (3.9%). The Spearman correlation analysis produced a Spearman’s rho of 0.076, which suggested only a weak association between both forms of communication.

Table 2

Online communication frequency In-person communication frequency
0–3 days/week (%) 4–6 days/week (%) Everyday (%) Total
0–3 days/week 168 (84.0) 683 (86.0) 1,730 (79.2) 2,581 (81.2)
4–6 days/week 18 (9.0) 80 (10.1) 244 (11.2) 342 (10.2)
Everyday 14 (7.0) 31 (3.9) 210 (9.6) 255 (8.0)
Total 200 (100) 794 (100) 2,184 (100) 3,178
Spearman’s rho 0.076*
Pearson’s Chi-squared 28.74 (p < 0.001)

Association between online communication and in-person communication (n = 3,178).

*Correlation coefficient < 0.4 indicates weak correlation.

Table 3 shows the association between online and in-person communication with BMI using multinomial logistic regression analysis. In model 1, result of the association between online communication and BMI is shown. Compared to 0–3 days/week, those who communicated online 4–6 days/week had a 46% higher risk (RRR = 1.46, 95%CI; 1.10, 1.95) of being overweight and obese. There was no significant association between online communication and being underweight. Model 2 shows the association between in-person communication and BMI. Compared to communicating in-person every day, those who communicated 0–3 days/week had a 94% increased risk (RRR = 1.94, 95%CI; 1.38, 2.72) of being overweight and obese. When online communication and in-person communication were adjusted simultaneously in model 3, in-person communication of 0–3 days/week was also associated with a 56% increased risk (RRR = 1.56, 95%CI; 1.09, 2.25) of being overweight and obese but online communication was not associated. Further, the analysis was stratified by gender, based on the marginal interaction effect (p for interaction =0.06).

Table 3

n (%) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
RRR (95%CI) RRR (95%CI) RRR (95% CI)
Overweight and obesity (≥ +1SD) (n = 534) Online
Everyday 44 (8.2) 1.07 (0.76, 1.52) 0.93 (0.65, 1.34)
4–6 days/week 73 (13.7) 1.46 (1.10, 1.95)* 1.27 (0.94, 1.71)
0–3 days/week 417 (78.1) ref ref
In person
Everyday 342 (64.0) ref ref
4–6 days/week 138 (25.8) 1.18 (0.94, 1.47) 1.11 (0.88, 1.40)
0–3 days/week 54 (10.1) 1.94 (1.38, 2.72)* 1.56 (1.09, 2.25)*
Membership in athletic and sports club
Yes 298 (55.8) ref
No 234 (43.8) 1.51 (1.21, 1.89)*
Frequency of exercise
Rarely 191(35.8) ref
1–2 times/week 164 (30.7) 1.13 (0.88, 1.46)
3–4 times/week 89 (16.7) 0.97 (0.71, 1.32)
5–6 times/week 49 (9.2) 0.75 (0.52, 1.10)
Everyday 40 (7.5) 0.89 (0.59, 1.34)
Close friends in the same class
0–4 180 (33.7) ref
5–9 163 (30.5) 1.10 (0.84, 1.43)
10+ 186 (34.8) 1.55 (1.14, 2.12)*
Close friends outside the same class
0–4 188 (35.2) ref
5–9 173 (32.4) 0.827 (0.66, 1.13)
10+ 164 (30.7) 0.65 (0.47, 0.90)*
Absence from school
Yes 320 (59.9) ref
No 208 (39.0) 0.80 (0.65, 0.98)*
I do not know 5 (0.9) 0.96 (0.35, 2.66)
Hospital admission
Yes 41 (7.7) ref
No 493 (92.3) 0.896 (0.59, 1.25)
PHQ-A Score
0–4 256 (47.9) ref
5–14 227 (42.5) 0.97 (0.78, 1.19)
15–19 33 (6.2) 1.00 (0.65, 1.54)
20+ 18 (3.4) 0.83(0.48, 1.45)
Birth order
Only child 133 (24.9) ref
Firstborn 156 (29.2) 0.68 (0.52, 0.88)*
Middle born 61 (11.4) 0.64 (0.45, 0.91)*
Last born 184 (34.5) 0.80 (0.61, 1.04)
Gender
Male 323 (60.5) ref
Female 211(39.5) 0.52 (0.42, 0.64)*
Maternal illness
Absent 150 (28.1) ref
Present 384 (71.9) 0.83 (0.64, 1.06)
Paternal illness
Absent 153 (28.7) ref
Present 355 (66.5) 1.29 (1.00, 1.66)*
Caregiver’s K6 score
0–4 316 (59.2) ref
5–12 171 (32.0) 1.10 (0.88, 1.36)
13–24 41 (7.7) 1.16 (0.78, 1.72)
Income
<3,000,000 JPY 85 (15.9) ref
3,000,000-6,000,000 JPY 175 (32.8) 0.82 (0.60, 1.13)
6,000,000 - 10,000,000 JPY 157 (29.4) 0.61 (0.44, 0.84)*
>10,000,000 JPY 41 (7.7) 0.43 (0.28, 0.66)*
Underweight (< -1SD) (n = 514) Online
Everyday 39 (7.6) 0.96 (0.66, 1.37) 0.85 (0.58, 1.25)
4–6 days/week 60 (11.7) 1.21 (0.89, 1.64) 1.10 (0.80, 1.51)
0–3 days/week 415 (80.7) ref ref
In person
Everyday 346 (67.3) ref ref
4–6 days/week 144 (28.0) 1.22 (0.98, 1.51) 1.13 (0.90, 1.41)
0–3 days/week 24 (4.7) 0.85 (0.54, 1.34) 0.78 (0.49, 1.24)
Membership in athletic and sports club
Yes 323 (62.8) ref
No 186 (36.2) 1.19(0.94, 1.49)
Frequency of exercise
Rarely 186 (36.2) ref ref ref
1–2 times/week 149 (29.0) 0.89 (0.695, 1.14)
3–4 times/week 82 (16.0) 0.74 (0.55, 1.01)
5–6 times/week 51 (9.9) 0.63 (0.44, 0.90)*
Everyday 41 (8.0) 0.69 (0.47, 1.03)
Close friends in the same class
0–4 167 (32.5) ref ref ref
5–9 200 (38.9) 1.17 (0.91, 1.51)
10+ 141 (27.4) 0.92 (0.67, 1.27)
Close friends outside the same class
0–4 167 (32.5) ref ref ref
5–9 183 (35.6) 1.01 (0.78, 1.31)
10+ 158 (30.7) 0.84 (0.61, 1.16)
Absence from school
Yes 283 (55.1) ref ref ref
No 225 (43.8) 0.87 (0.71, 1.07)
I do not know 5 (1.0) 0.98 (0.36, 2.68)
Hospital admission
Yes 20 (3.9) ref
No 493 (95.9) 1.82 (1.12, 2.96)*
PHQ-A Score
0–4 290 (56.4) ref
5–14 196 (38.1) 0.78 (0.63, 0.96)*
15–19 18 (3.5) 0.53 (0.31, 0.89)*
20+ 9 (1.8) 0.42 (0.20, 0.85)*
Birth order
Only child 84 (16.3) ref
Firstborn 182 (35.4) 1.14 (0.85, 1.53)
Middle born 68 (13.2) 1.01 (0.71, 1.45)
Last born 180 (35.0) 1.06 (0.79, 1.43)
Gender
Male 309 (60.1) ref
Female 205 (39.9) 0.53 (0.42, 0.65)*
Maternal illness
Absent 144 (28.0) ref
Present 370 (72.0) 0.98 (0.76, 1.26)
Paternal illness
Absent 159 (30.9) ref
Present 332 (64.6) 1.00 (0.78, 1.29)
Caregiver’s K6 score
0–4 322 (62.7) ref
5–12 148 (28.8) 1.02 (0.82, 1.29)
13–24 35 (6.81) 1.25 (0.83, 1.89)
Income
<3,000,000 JPY 48 (9.3) ref
3,000,000-6,000,000 JPY 131(25.5) 1.08 (0.74, 1.57)
6,000,000 - 10,000,000 JPY 195 (37.9) 1.24 (0.86, 1.79)
>10,000,000 JPY 58 (11.3) 0.98 (0.63, 1.51)

Association between online communication, in person communication and BMI (n = 3,178).

RRR, Relative risk ratio; CI, Confidence interval.

Model 1 – bivariate regression between online communication and BMI.

Model 2 – bivariate regression between in person communication and BMI.

Model 3 – adjusted for sex, income, communication inside and outside the class, order of birth, depression and involvement in club activities, hospital admissions, absence from school, mental health of caregiver, maternal and paternal disease, and physical activity.

*indicates p-value < 0.05.

Table 4 shows the association between online and in-person communication with BMI among females. In model 1, compared to online communication of 0-3 days/week, communicating 4–6 days/week was associated with 70% increased risk of overweight and obesity (RRR = 1.70, 95%CI; 1.02, 2.85). In model 2, compared to talking every day, females who communicated in-person 4–6 days/week had 42% increased risk (RRR = 1.42, 95%CI; 1.02, 1.97) of being overweight and obese and those who communicated 0–3 days/week had 157% increased risk (RRR = 2.57, 95%CI; 1.53, 4.31) of being overweight and obese. In model 3, when online communication and in-person communication were adjusted simultaneously, the association remained similar to that of model 2. That is, compared to talking every day, in-person communication of 4–6 days/week was associated with 43% higher risk (RRR = 1.43, 95%CI; 1.01, 2.03) while 0–3 days/week was associated with 112% higher risk (RRR = 2.12, 95%CI; 1.20, 3.73) of being overweight and obese.

Table 4

n (%) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
RRR (95%CI) RRR (95%CI) RRR (95% CI)
Overweight and obesity (≥ +1SD) (n = 211) Online
Everyday 11 (5.2) 1.30 (0.66, 2.56) 1.14 (0.55, 2.34)
4–6 days/week 21 (10.0) 1.70 (1.02, 2.85)* 1.60 (0.93, 2.74)
0–3 days/week 179 (84.3) ref ref
In person
Everyday 125 (59.2) ref ref
4–6 days/week 63 (30.0) 1.42 (1.02, 1.97)* 1.43 (1.01, 2.03)*
0–3 days/week 23 (10.9) 2.57 (1.53, 4.31)* 2.12 (1.20, 3.73)*
Membership in athletic and sports club
Yes 91 (43.1) ref
No 119 (56.4) 1.65 (1.17, 2.34)*
Frequency of exercise
Rarely 92 (43.6) ref
1–2 times/week 68 (32.2) 1.09 (0.75, 1.58)
3–4 times/week 27 (12.8) 0.98 (0.60, 1.62)
5–6 times/week 14 (6.6) 1.06 (0.55, 2.04)
Everyday 10 (4.7) 1.12 (0.52, 2.41)
Close friends in the same class
0–4 95 (45.0) ref
5–9 58 (27.5) 1.09 (0.74, 1.61)
10+ 56 (26.5) 2.38 (1.48, 3.85)*
Close friends outside the same class
0–4 101 (47.9) ref
5–9 71 (33.7) 0.85 (0.58, 1.24)
10+ 38 (18.0) 0.62 (0.37, 1.05)
Absence from school
Yes 129 (61.1) ref
No 81 (38.4) 0.77 (0.56, 1.06)
I do not know 1 (0.5) 1.31 (0.14, 12.53)
Hospital admission
Yes 13 (6.2) ref
No 198 (93.8) 0.95 (0.50, 1.80)
PHQ-A Score
0–4 84 (39.8) ref
5–14 93 (44.1) 0.85 (0.60, 1.18)
15–19 22 (10.4) 1.26 (0.72, 2.20)
20+ 12 (5.7) 1.10 (0.53, 2.28)
Birth order
Only child 53 (25.1) ref
Firstborn 61 (28.9) 0.69 (0.45, 1.06)
Middle born 24 (11.4) 0.74 (0.42, 1.28)
Last born 73 (34.6) 0.78 (0.52, 1.18)
Maternal illness
Absent 57 (27.0) ref
Present 154 (73.0) 0.77 (0.52, 1.14)
Paternal illness
Absent 54 (25.6) ref
Present 148 (70.1) 1.50 (1.01, 2.23)
Caregiver’s K6 score
0–4 125 (59.2) ref
5–12 71 (33.7) 1.20 (0.85, 1.67)
13–24 14 (6.6) 1.16 (0.61, 2.23)
Income
<3,000,000 JPY 30 (14.2) ref
3,000,000-6,000,000 JPY 81 (38.4) 1.32 (0.80, 2.18)
6,000,000 - 10,000,000 JPY 53 (25.1) 0.64 (0.38, 1.07)
>10,000,000 JPY 17 (8.1) 0.58 (0.30, 1.15)
Underweight (< -1SD) (n = 205) Online
Everyday 5 (2.4) 0.57 (0.22, 1.44) 0.58 (0.22, 1.54)
4–6 days/week 13 (6.3) 1.01 (0.55, 1.86) 1.22 (0.65, 2.29)
0–3 days/week 187 (91.2) ref ref
In person
Everyday 149 (72.7) ref ref
4–6 days/week 49 (23.9) 0.92 (0.65, 1.31) 0.87 (0.60, 1.25)
0–3 days/week 7 (3.4) 0.65 (0.29, 1.46) 0.64 (0.28, 1.46)
Membership in athletic and sports club
Yes 113 (55.1) ref
No 91(44.4) 1.08 (0.77, 1.52)
Frequency of exercise
Rarely 92 (44.9) ref
1–2 times/week 63 (30.7) 0.86 (0.59, 1.25)
3–4 times/week 32 (15.6) 0.93 (0.59, 1.49)
5–6 times/week 8 (3.9) 0.42 (0.19, 0.92)*
Everyday 10 (4.9) 0.79 (0.38, 1.67)
Close friends in the same class
0–4 96 (46.8) ref
5–9 76 (37.1) 1.04 (0.73, 1.48)
10+ 30 (14.6) 0.80 (0.48, 1.35)
Close friends outside the same class
0–4 88 (42.9) ref
5–9 80 (39.0) 1.14 (0.79, 1.63)
10+ 34 (16.6) 0.86 (0.51, 1.43)
Absence from school
Yes 111 (54.2) ref
No 89 (43.4) 0.86 (0.63, 1.18)
I do not know 4 (2.0) 5.43 (1.33, 22.17)*
Hospital admission
Yes 9 (4.4) ref
No 196 (95.6) 1.31(0.63, 2.72)
PHQ-A Score
0–4 103 (50.2) ref
5–14 88 (42.9) 0.72 (0.52, 0.99)*
15–19 9 (4.4) 0.52 (0.25, 1.10)
20+ 5 (2.4) 0.55 (0.21, 1.45)
Birth order
Only child 38 (18.5) ref
Firstborn 73 (35.6) 1.03 (0.66, 1.59)
Middle born 27 (13.2) 1.05 (0.60, 1.83)
Last born 67 (32.7) 0.82 (0.53, 1.29)
Maternal illness
Absent 51 (24.9) ref
Present 154 (75.1) 1.27 (0.85, 1.90)
Paternal illness
Absent 66 (32.2) ref
Present 128 (62.4) 0.77 (0.53, 1.13)
Caregiver’s K6 score
0–4 141 (68.8) ref
5–12 49 (23.9) 0.84 (0.58, 1.20)
13–24 12 (5.9) 1.26 (0.64, 2.49)
Income
<3,000,000 JPY 15 (7.3) ref
3,000,000-6,000,000 JPY 60 (29.3) 1.84 (0.98, 3.45)
6,000,000 - 10,000,000 JPY 82 (40.0) 1.66 (0.89, 3.07)
>10,000,000 JPY 23 (11.2) 1.34 (0.65, 2.79)

Association between online communication, in person communication and BMI among female students (n = 1,551).

RRR, Relative risk ratio; CI, Confidence interval.

Model 1 – bivariate regression between online communication and BMI.

Model 2 – bivariate regression between in person communication and BMI.

Model 3 – adjusted for sex, income, communication inside and outside the class, order of birth, depression and involvement in club activities, hospital admissions, absence from school, mental health of caregiver, maternal and paternal disease, and physical activity.

* indicates p-value < 0.05.

In Table 5, the results of multinomial logistic regression analysis to examine the association between online and in-person communication with BMI among males is shown. In model 1, there was no significant association between online communication and BMI. In model 2, in-person communication of 4–6 days/week was associated with a 48% higher risk (RRR = 1.48, 95%CI;1.11, 1.97) of being underweight. When online communication and in-person communication were adjusted simultaneously in model 3, there was no association between both communication methods and BMI.

Table 5

n (%) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
RRR (95%CI) RRR (95%CI) RRR (95% CI)
Overweight and obesity (≥ +1SD) (n = 323) Online
Everyday 33 (10.2) 0.82(0.54, 1.23) 0.80 (0.52, 1.23)
4–6 days/week 52 (16.1) 1.15(0.81, 1.63) 1.16 (0.81, 1.67)
0–3 days/week 238(73.7) ref ref
In person
Everyday 217 (67.2) ref ref
4–6 days/week 75 (23.2) 1.06 (0.78, 1.43) 0.92 (0.67, 1.26)
0–3 days/week 31 (9.6) 1.54 (0.98, 2.43) 1.29 (0.79, 2.09)
Membership in athletic and sports club
Ye 207 (64.1) ref
No 115 (35.6) 1.47 (1.08, 2.00)*
Frequency of exercise
Rarely 99 (30.7) ref
1–2 times/week 96 (29.7) 1.12 (0.78, 1.60)
3–4 times/week 62 (19.2) 0.93 (0.62, 1.38)
5–6 times/week 35 (10.8) 0.64 (0.40, 1.02)
Everyday 30 (9.3) 0.80 (0.48, 1.33)
Close friends in the same class
0–4 85 (26.3) ref
5–9 105 (32.5) 1.08 (0.74, 1.59)
10+ 130 (40.3) 1.23 (0.80, 1.87)
Close friends outside the same class
0–4 87 (26.9) ref
5–9 102 (31.6) 0.84 (0.57, 1.24)
10+ 126 (39.0) 0.65 (0.42, 1.01)
Absence from school
Yes 191 (59.1) ref
No 127 (39.3) 0.80 (0.61, 1.05)
I do not know 4 (1.2) 0.74 (0.23, 2.31)
Hospital admission
Yes 28 (8.7) ref
No 295 (91.3) 0.84 (0.52, 1.34)
PHQ-A Score
0–4 172 (53.3) ref
5–14 134 (41.5) 1.06 (0.81, 1.40)
15–19 11 (3.4) 0.61 (0.30, 1.24)
20+ 6 (1.9) 0.49 (0.19, 1.23)
Birth order
Only child 80 (24.8) ref
Firstborn 95 (29.4) 0.67 (0.47, 0.97)*
Middle born 37 (11.5) 0.57 (0.36, 0.91)*
Last born 111 (34.4) 0.82 (0.57, 1.17)
Maternal illness
Absent 93 (28.8) ref
Present 230 (71.2) 0.83 (0.59, 1.16)
Paternal illness
Absent 99 (30.7) ref
Present 207 (64.1) 1.17 (0.83, 1.64)
Caregiver’s K6 score
0–4 191 (59.1) ref
5–12 100 (31.0) 1.03 (0.76, 1.38)
13–24 27 (8.4) 1.21 (0.73, 2.01)
Income
<3,000,000 JPY 55 (17.0) ref
3,000,000-6,000,000 JPY 94 (29.1) 0.55 (0.36, 0.84)*
6,000,000 - 10,000,000 JPY 104 (32.2) 0.61 (0.40, 0.93)*
>10,000,000 JPY 24 (7.4) 0.36 (0.20, 0.63)*
Underweight (< -1SD) (n = 309) Online
Everyday 34 (11.0) 0.88 (0.59, 1.32) 0.91 (0.60, 1.39)
4–6 days/week 47 (15.2) 1.09 (0.76, 1.56) 1.12 (0.77, 1.63)
0–3 days/week 228 (73.8) ref ref
In person
Everyday 197 (63.8) ref ref
4–6 days/week 95 (30.7) 1.48 (1.11,1.97)* 1.31 (0.97, 1.78)
0–3 days/week 17 (5.5) 0.93 (0.53, 1.62) 0.87 (0.48, 1.55)
Membership in athletic and sports club
Yes 210 (68.0) ref
No 95 (30.7) 1.27 (0.92, 1.76)
Frequency of exercise
Rarely 94 (30.4) ref
1–2 times/week 86 (27.8) 1.00 (0.69, 1.43)
3–4 times/week 50 (16.2) 0.71 (0.47, 1.09)
5–6 times/week 43 (13.9) 0.79 (0.50, 1.25)
Everyday 31 (10.0) 0.75 (0.45, 1.25)
Close friends in the same class
0–4 71 (23.0) ref
5–9 124 (40.1) 1.35 (0.92, 2.00)
10+ 111 (35.9) 1.05 (0.68, 1.63)
Close friends outside the same class
0–4 79 (25.6) ref
5–9 103 (33.3) 0.85 (0.57, 1.26)
10+ 124 (40.1) 0.74 (0.48, 1.15)
Absence from school
Yes 172 (55.7) ref
No 136 (44.0) 0.86 (0.66, 1.13)
I do not know 1 (0.3) 0.20 (0.03, 1.56)
Hospital admission
Yes 11 (3.6) ref
No 297 (96.1) 2.32 (1.20, 4.49)*
PHQ-A Score
0–4 187 (60.5) ref
5–14 108 (35.0) 0.81 (0.61, 1.08)
15–19 9 (2.9) 0.52 (0.24, 1.12)
20+ 4 (1.3) 0.32 (0.11, 0.93)
Birth order
Only child 46 (14.9) ref
Firstborn 109 (35.3) 1.23 (0.82, 1.84)
Middle born 41 (13.3) 0.97 (0.60, 1.58)
Last born 113 (36.6) 1.28 (0.85, 1.91)
Maternal illness
Absent 93 (30.1) ref
Present 216 (69.9) 0.79 (0.56, 1.11)
Paternal illness
Absent 93 (30.1) ref
Present 204 (66.0) 1.25 (0.88, 1.77)
Caregiver’s K6 score
0–4 181 (58.6) ref
5–12 99 (32.0) 1.20 (0.90, 1.62)
13–24 23 (7.4) 1.36 (0.80, 2.31)
Income
<3,000,000 JPY 33 (10.7) ref
3,000,000-6,000,000 JPY 71 (23.0) 0.69 (0.42, 1.12)
6,000,000 - 10,000,000 JPY 113 (36.6) 1.01 (0.63, 1.62)
>10,000,000 JPY 35 (11.3) 0.77 (0.43, 1.35)

Association between online communication, in person communication and BMI among male students (n = 1,627).

RRR, Relative risk ratio; CI, Confidence interval.

Model 1 – bivariate regression between online communication and BMI.

Model 2 – bivariate regression between in person communication and BMI.

Model 3 – adjusted for sex, income, communication inside and outside the class, order of birth, depression and involvement in club activities, hospital admissions, absence from school, mental health of caregiver, maternal and paternal disease, and physical activity.

* indicates p-value < 0.05.

Further, analysis using interaction between communication methods and household income showed no significant association across all income categories.

Discussion

In this study, we found that reduced frequency in in-person communication was associated with a higher risk of becoming overweight or obese during COVID-19 pandemic. We also found that female adolescents were at an increased risk of overweight and obesity with a reduction in the frequency of in-person communication while males were not. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of communication methods and frequency on the BMI of adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to simultaneously examine the association of online and in-person communication with BMI.

Our finding on reduced in-person communication frequency being associated with a higher risk in becoming overweight and obese among adolescents was not reported in other studies, since previous studies conducted on adolescent and young adults focused on social networks which combined both online and in-person communications (32, 33). Among peers, social facilitation plays an important role in influencing certain health behaviors, such as physical activities (34). A previous study revealed that adolescents are motivated to engage in physical activities in the presence of their friends (35). While being physically present with their peers and communicating face-to-face, adolescents exhibit more physical activities. A reversal of this situation could potentially lead to a decrease in face-to-face communication and consequently, a decrease in physical activity. Additionally, physical communication among peers could enhance sharing of knowledge and information that promote healthy behaviors. A previous study conducted in a manufacturing firm revealed that face-to-face social networks and interactions significantly promote sharing of knowledge among groups and organizations (36). Although the reference focuses on knowledge sharing in companies, the underlying principles of face-to-face interactions facilitating information sharing and influencing behavior could be applicable to in-person interactions in school settings. These interactions are important for disseminating health-related knowledge that contribute to maintaining a healthy BMI.

From our study, female adolescents were at an increased risk of overweight and obesity with a reduction in in-person communication frequency while males were not. A similar study conducted among adults aged 45–85 years demonstrated that reduced social participation was associated with weight gain among females but not in males (14), which confirms our finding. To the best of our knowledge, there was however no study found specific to adolescents. Our finding among adolescents could be explained in several ways. First, it is well established that adolescent females generally have higher body fat levels than males and are therefore more prone to weight gain (37). Second, concerning extracurricular activities, females are less likely to participate in afterschool physical activities compared to males (38). Instead, they are inclined to join groups that involve minimal physical energy such as academic or arts groups (39). Reduction in in-person interaction further decreases their physical activity levels, leading to an increase in BMI. Third, in Japan, females’ perception of their body image and desire to be thin are influenced by their peers (40). While meeting and interacting with their peers in school, they tend to be more self-aware of their body size. Consequently, a decrease in peer interaction might lead to a reduced concern about their body image, possibly resulting in weight gain.

From our findings, we observed inconsistent results between the adjusted and crude models for online communication and BMI. In the crude model, we observed an association between online communication and BMI, which we acknowledge was biased by confounders. To account for this, we adjusted for confounders. When the adjusted model did not show any significant result, we interpreted this as indicating that the association observed in the crude model was confounded by these variables. The true association is observed in the adjusted model, revealing no association between online communication and BMI.

Our study has some limitations; first, the frequency of online and in-person communication was self-reported by participants, and assessed retrospectively which could result in non-differential misclassification of the exposure and recall bias. To mitigate this, future studies could incorporate cross-validation with alternative data collection methods such as digital communication logs, wearable technology or attendance records such as club participation logs to infer face-to-face interaction. Second, this study exclusively involved children from public schools in Adachi city, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. In Japan, children attending private schools are more often from higher socio-economic backgrounds compared to those in public schools (41). This socio-economic difference may provide students from private schools with better access to technology and extracurricular activities, which could influence their communication methods and health outcomes. However, the proportion of students in private elementary school is very low, 1.1% (42). In addition, since Adachi City is predominantly urban, public schools in rural areas may differ from urban areas in terms of access to technology for communication and classroom sizes. These could also affect communication methods. Future studies could include a more diverse range of schools, encompassing both public and private high schools in both rural and urban settings. Lastly, because this is a cross-sectional study, we cannot establish causality between in-person communication and overweight/obesity, implying the possibility of reverse causation. For instance, children with high BMI are less likely to engage in face-to-face communication with their peers (43), rather than reduced in-person communication resulting in higher BMI. To address this limitation, future studies using longitudinal design should be conducted to understand the causal pathway of this association. Despite these limitations, findings from this study can serve as a valuable resource for public health policy makers in shaping policies aimed at enhancing the physical well-being of children in the post covid-19 era and in future pandemics. This could be done by setting up initiatives to promote physical interactions within schools and communities. Additionally, it can offer guidance to parents and teachers on promoting healthy lifestyle by encouraging increased face-to-face interactions in school and at home as opposed to online social networking. Further, findings from this study could be used in health promotion campaigns to help children understand the importance of physically engaging with friends in school.

Conclusion

Our study revealed that reduced frequency in face-to face interaction was associated with overweight and obesity, particularly among females, during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings may offer valuable insights into the importance for face-to-face interactions in the post-COVID-19 era and future pandemics, aiming to tackle potential health concerns among children and adolescents.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to .

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Center for Child Health and Development (Approval number: 1147) and Tokyo Medical and Dental University (Approval number: M2016-284). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

FO: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NN: Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. HN: Writing – review & editing, Validation. YK: Writing – review & editing, Validation. DS: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. SS: Writing – review & editing, Validation. AI: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. TF: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by a Health Labour Sciences Research Grant, Comprehensive Research on Lifestyle Disease from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (H27-Jyunkankito-ippan-002), Research of Policy Planning and Evaluation from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (H29-Seisaku-Shitei-004), Innovative Research Program on Suicide Countermeasures (IRPSC), and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16H03276, 16K21669, 17J05974, 17K13245, 19K19310, 19K14029, 19K19309, 19K20109, 19K14172, 19J01614, 19H04879, 20K13945, 21H04848, 21K18294, and 22H05103), JST RISTEX (JPMJRS24K2), St. Luke’s Life Science Institute Grants, the Japan Health Foundation Grants, and Research-Aid (Designated Theme), Meiji Yasuda Life Foundation of Health and Welfare.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff members and central office of Adachi City Hall for conducting the survey. We would like to thank everyone who participated in the surveys. In particular, we would also like to thank Mayor Yayoi Kondo, Mr. Syuichiro Akiu, and Ms. Yuko Baba of Adachi City Hall, all of whom contributed significantly to the completion of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.

    Economic impact of overweight and obesity to surpass $4 trillion by 2035 | World Obesity Federation. Accessed July 19, (2023). Available at:https://www.worldobesity.org/news/economic-impact-of-overweight-and-obesity-to-surpass-4-trillion-by-2035

  • 2.

    World Obesity Day 2022 – Accelerating action to stop obesity . Accessed July 19, 2023. Available at:https://www.who.int/news/item/04-03-2022-world-obesity-day-2022-accelerating-action-to-stop-obesity

  • 3.

    Simmonds M Llewellyn A Owen CG Woolacott N . Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. (2016) 17:95107. doi: 10.1111/obr.12334

  • 4.

    Kim NH Lee JM Yoo E . How the COVID-19 pandemic has changed adolescent health: physical activity, sleep, obesity, and mental health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:9224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159224

  • 5.

    Guazzini A Pesce A Gino F Duradoni M . How the COVID-19 pandemic changed adolescents’ use of technologies, sense of community, and loneliness: a retrospective perception analysis. Behav Sci (Basel). (2022) 12:228. doi: 10.3390/bs12070228

  • 6.

    Iwabuchi K Hodama K Onishi Y Miyazaki S Nakae S Suzuki KH . Covid-19 and education on the front lines in Japan: what caused learning disparities and how did the government and schools take initiative? Ed. Fernando M. Reimers. In:. Primary and Secondary Education During Covid-19, Disruptions to Educational Opportunity During a Pandemic, Springer, vol. 1 (2021). 12551.

  • 7.

    Tokyo begins online English lessons at public high schools. The Asahi Shimbun: Breaking News, Japan News and Analysis. Accessed August 3, 2023. (2023). Available at:https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14943573

  • 8.

    Mieziene B Emeljanovas A Novak D Kawachi I . Social capital promotes a healthier diet among young adults by reducing psychological distress. Nutrients. (2022) 14:113. doi: 10.3390/nu14235187

  • 9.

    Salvy SJ Bowker JC Germeroth L Barkley J . Influence of peers and friends on overweight/obese youths’ physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. (2012) 40:12732. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e31825af07b

  • 10.

    Gomez-Baya D Rubio-Gonzalez A Gaspar de Matos M . Online communication, peer relationships and school victimisation: a one-year longitudinal study during middle adolescence. Int J Adolesc Youth. (2019) 24:199211. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2018.1509793

  • 11.

    Purba AK Thomson RM Henery PM Pearce A Henderson M Katikireddi SV . Social media use and health risk behaviours in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. (2023) 383:e073552. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073552

  • 12.

    Ma Z Wang J Li J Jia Y . The association between obesity and problematic smartphone use among school-age children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:206711. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12124-6

  • 13.

    Sampasa-Kanyinga H Colman I Goldfield GS Hamilton HA Chaput JP . Sex differences in the relationship between social media use, short sleep duration, and body mass index among adolescents. Sleep Heal. (2020) 6:6018. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2020.01.017

  • 14.

    Hosseini Z Veenstra G Khan NA Conklin AI . Associations between social connections, their interactions, and obesity differ by gender: a population-based, cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0235977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235977

  • 15.

    Japanese Society of School Health . Children’s Health Diagnostic Manual, Revised ed 2015. (In Japanese). Accessed January 24, 2025. (2006). 2022. Available at:https://www.gakkohoken.jp/book/ebook/ebook_H270030/index_h5.html#4

  • 16.

    De Onis M . WHO child growth standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Int J Paediatr. (2006) 95:7685. doi: 10.1080/08035320500495548

  • 17.

    Shelton RC McNeill LH Puleo E Wolin KY Emmons KM Bennett GG . The association between social factors and physical activity among low-income adults living in public housing. Am J Public Health. (2011) 101:210210. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.196030

  • 18.

    Roberts SGB Dunbar RIM . Communication in social networks: effects of kinship, network size, and emotional closeness. Pers Relatsh. (2011) 18:43952. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01310.x

  • 19.

    Barbry A Carton A Ovigneur H Coquart J . Relationships between sports club participation and physical fitness and body mass index in childhood. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. (2022) 62:9317. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12643-X

  • 20.

    Yi Y Seo JH . The relationship between communication competence and exercise participation type: focusing on joining clubs and using fitness applications. J Exerc Rehabil. (2018) 14:9348. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836546.273

  • 21.

    Johnson JG Harris ES Spitzer RL Williams JBW . The patient health questionnaire for adolescents: validation of an instrument for the assessment of mental disorders among adolescent primary care patients. J Adolesc Health. (2002) 30:196204. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00333-0

  • 22.

    Lindberg L Hagman E Danielsson P Marcus C Persson M . Anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with obesity: a nationwide study in Sweden. BMC Med. (2020) 18:19. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1498-z

  • 23.

    O’Connor M Hawkins MT Toumbourou JW Sanson A Letcher P Olsson CA . The relationship between social capital and depression during the transition to adulthood. Aust J Psychol. (2011) 63:2635. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00004.x

  • 24.

    Furukawa TA Kawakami N Saitoh M Ono Y Nakane Y Nakamura Y et al . The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the world mental health survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. (2008) 17:1528. doi: 10.1002/MPR.257

  • 25.

    Marco PL Valério ID de Mola Zanatti CL Gonçalves H . Systematic review: symptoms of parental depression and anxiety and offspring overweight. Rev Saude Publica. (2020) 54:4913. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2020054001731

  • 26.

    Wolicki SB Bitsko RH Cree RA Danielson ML Ko JY Warner L et al . Mental health of parents and primary caregivers by sex and associated child health indicators. Advers Resil Sci. (2021) 2:12539. doi: 10.1007/s42844-021-00037-7

  • 27.

    Kaasbøll J Ranøyen I Nilsen W Lydersen S Indredavik MS . Associations between parental chronic pain and self-esteem, social competence, and family cohesion in adolescent girls and boys - family linkage data from the HUNT study. BMC Public Health. (2015) 15:19. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2164-9

  • 28.

    Meller FO de Mola CL Assunção MCF Schäfer AA Dahly DL Barros FC . Birth order and number of siblings and their association with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. (2018) 76:11724. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux060

  • 29.

    Molesy A Ngyah-Etchutambe I Fon K . Sibling Position and the Development of Social Skills among Children. Int J Psychol. (2022) 7:924. doi: 10.47604/ijp.1724

  • 30.

    Kaur S Kapil U Singh P . Pattern of chronic diseases amongst adolescent obese children in developing countries. Curr Sci. (2005) 88:10526.

  • 31.

    Inoue S Kato T Yorifuji T . Life satisfaction, interpersonal relationships, and learning influence withdrawal from school: a study among junior high school students in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:2309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102309

  • 32.

    Marks J De La Haye K Barnett LM Allender S . Friendship network characteristics are associated with physical activity and sedentary behavior in early adolescence. PLoS One. (2015) 10:115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145344

  • 33.

    Du T Li Y . Effects of social networks in promoting young adults’ physical activity among different sociodemographic groups. Behav Sci (Basel). (2022) 12:345. doi: 10.3390/bs12090345

  • 34.

    Salvy SJ de la Haye K Bowker JC Hermans RCJ . Influence of peers and friends on children’s and adolescents’ eating and activity behaviors. Physiol Behav. (2012) 106:36978. doi: 10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2012.03.022

  • 35.

    Romero ND Stadler PJ Epstein LH . Effect of peers and friends on youth physical activity and motivation to be physically active. J Pediatr Psychol. (2009) 34:21725. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn071

  • 36.

    Al Saifi SA Dillon S McQueen R . The relationship between face to face social networks and knowledge sharing: an exploratory study of manufacturing firms. J Knowl Manag. (2016) 20:30826. doi: 10.1108/JKM-07-2015-0251

  • 37.

    Vehrs PR Fellingham GW McAferty A Kelsey L . Trends in BMI percentile and body fat percentage in children 12 to 17 years of age. Children. (2022) 9:110. doi: 10.3390/children9050744

  • 38.

    He L Ishii K Shibata A Adachi M Nonoue K Oka K . Patterns of physical activity outside of school time among japanese junior high school students. J Sch Health. (2013) 83:62330. doi: 10.1111/josh.12074

  • 39.

    Berger C Brotfeld C Espelage DL . Extracurricular activities and peer relational victimization: role of gender and school social norms. J Sch Violence. (2021) 20:61126. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2022.2026226

  • 40.

    Mase T Ohara K Miyawaki C Kouda K Nakamura H . Influences of peers’ and family members’ body shapes on perception of body image and desire for thinness in Japanese female students. Int J Women's Health. (2015) 7:62533. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S82193

  • 41.

    Liu Z . The multi-dimensional effect of family income on opportunity equality of access to higher education in Japan. SHS Web Conf. (2024) 190:01023. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/202419001023

  • 42.

    "Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-Japan ". 私立学校の振興:文部科学省. Accessed January 30, 2025. (2010). Available at:https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/shinkou/main5_a3.htm

  • 43.

    Strauss RS Pollack HA . Social marginalization of overweight children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. (2003) 157:74652. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.8.746

Summary

Keywords

adolescent health, BMI, communication style, COVID-19, Japan

Citation

Owusu FM, Nawa N, Nishimura H, Khin YP, Satomi D, Shakagori S, Isumi A and Fujiwara T (2025) Association of communication methods and frequency with BMI among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from A-CHILD study. Front. Public Health 13:1433523. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1433523

Received

16 May 2024

Accepted

11 February 2025

Published

28 February 2025

Volume

13 - 2025

Edited by

Dickson A. Amugsi, African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Kenya

Reviewed by

Zhengzong Huang, Shenzhen Technology University, China

Mona Mamdouh Hassan, Cairo University, Egypt

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Takeo Fujiwara,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics