Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Public Health, 10 November 2025

Sec. Aging and Public Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1708607

This article is part of the Research TopicNovel Rehabilitation Approaches for Non-Communicable Diseases in the Era of Precision MedicineView all 11 articles

Effectiveness of digital co-creation platform in remote pulmonary rehabilitation for older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial

Xueying HuangXueying HuangXianjing SongXianjing SongManyao SunManyao SunYi HouYi HouJiang NanJiang NanJing GaoJing GaoSongxin FuSongxin FuYuyu Jiang
Yuyu Jiang*
  • Department of Nursing, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China

Aims: Despite proven benefits, older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) face significant challenging in adhering to telehealth-enabled pulmonary rehabilitation (Tele-PR). Co-creation represents an innovative approach to behavioral intervention. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of improving activation and adherence among older adults with COPD who accepted an intervention incorporating co-creation sessions.

Methods: A total of 102 older adults diagnosed with COPD were randomly assigned to the control group (PR group) or digitalization co-creation group (CC-CoI group). The intervention lasted for 12 weeks, and the follow-up was 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were patient activation and Tele-PR adherence. The secondary outcomes included dyspnea symptoms, exercise self-efficacy, self-management ability, social support, cognitive level, and satisfaction with medical service. Data were collected at baseline, week 12, and week 24.

Results: A total of 102 participants completed the study. At weeks 12 and 24, there were statistically significant differences in patient activation (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) between the two groups. Tele-PR adherence remained effectively maintained in the CC-CoI group (p = 0.607, p = 0.332), while the PR group showed a significant decline (p = 0.006, p < 0.001). The CC-CoI group also exhibited significant improvements in the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale score, Exercise Self-Regulatory Efficacy Scale (Ex-SRES) score, COPD Self-Management Scale (CSMS) score, Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) score, and COPD knowledge.

Conclusion: These results indicate that digital co-creation enhances the active participation of older adults in Tele-PR and fosters the development of virtual communities along with the onset of altruistic behaviors in individuals. This approach encourages patients to apply their knowledge for self-management of health behaviors, which in turn, enhances their adherence to rehabilitation exercise and leads to better health outcomes.

Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR): ChiCTR1900028563/December 27, 2019. http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/default.aspx.

1 Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent and costly respiratory disease (1), projected to become the third leading cause of death and the fifth most significant economic burden globally by 2030 (2, 3). With the aging global population, the proportions of patients with COPD over the age of 65 is increasing, affecting an estimated 20–25% of this demographic (4, 5).

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), with exercise training combined with disease-specific education as the core components, is widely recognized as a fundamental part of COPD treatment and management (6). Telehealth-enabled pulmonary rehabilitation (Tele-PR) refers to the delivery of rehabilitation services to home-based patients remotely using information and communication technologies, such as smart wristbands, actigraphy, and tablet personal computer (7, 8). With advancements in information technology, Tele-PR is gaining popularity due to its convenience, cost-effectiveness, and broad accessibility (9). With the potential to improve acceptance and access to PR, Tele-PR could alleviate symptoms, enhance activity tolerance, improve quality of life, and reduce the strain on healthcare systems (10). Despite its benefits, adherence to Tele-PR among older adults with COPD remains challenging (11, 12). A meta-analysis by Alghamdi et al. (13) revealed that older adults with COPD showed a high level of acceptance of the Tele-PR clinical trial, with participation rates of 80 and 51% for unweighted and weighted participants, respectively. However, participation rates declined in large-scale scenarios, and the withdrawal rate in the Tele-PR group (63%) was significantly higher than in the control group (37%) (13). In a 3-month Tele-PR program for older adults with COPD conducted by Jiang et al. (14), nearly half of the patients exhibited low adherence, which dropped from 58.3 to 33.3%. Studies have shown that improvements in patient health are associated with adherence to Tele-PR; cessation of exercise training can lead to a loss of recovery benefits within a year (15).

Patient activation is critical for participation and adherence to Tele-PR, yet older adults with COPD often lack this engagement (16, 17). The reasons for insufficient patient activation may include limited patient understanding and awareness of their disease condition and the practical effects of exercise rehabilitation (18), as well as their inability to engage in the implementation of Tele-PR programs, which rely on a traditional expert-driven model (19). Currently, researchers have primarily employed Social cognitive theory and behavioral interventions as the main strategies to boost patient activation (2022).

Co-creation is a novel strategy for behavioral intervention. Co-creation in research is broadly defined as the collaborative generation of knowledge, incorporating diverse stakeholders perspectives (23), which has the potential to address the issue of lack of activation (24, 25). With advancements in information and digital technologies, co-creation enables the integration of resources from all stakeholders via interactive platforms, facilitating value creation and the generation of innovative outcomes (26, 27). This process can be viewed as a form of digital labor (28). Through co-creation, patients transition from passive recipients to active participants in medical decision-making and nursing practices, thereby enhancing their disease management capabilities and adherence to exercise rehabilitation (17, 22, 24). Furthermore, the co-creation strategy can optimize patient education, improve patients’ understanding of disease management, and facilitate doctor-patient communication, ultimately enhancing treatment outcomes (29, 30). Consequently, this study integrated the co-creation phase into the implementation of the Tele-PR program to boost patient activation and adherence.

Additionally, several studies have demonstrated that the successful implementation of co-creation requires the guidance of a theoretical framework (31, 32). The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework is a collaborative-constructivist framework that comprises three critical elements: teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence (3335). It provides theoretical guidance for various aspects of co-creation, including knowledge preparation, social interaction, and knowledge application. This framework emphasizes the transfer of knowledge and skills throughout the practical process. Through interaction, collaboration, and continuous reflection, participants progressively deepen their understanding while fostering the sharing and application of knowledge. This process ensures that all stakeholders engage in genuine co-creation (36, 37), thereby achieving the goal of co-creation, aligning with value co-creation, value sharing, and value co-winnings (38). To date, no transformation studies applying the CoI framework to COPD management have been published.

This study aimed to incorporate co-creation into the Tele-PR intervention process. By utilizing the CoI framework, we developed and evaluated a “digital co-creation” (CC-CoI) platform, which was applied over a 12-week intervention period, followed by an additional 12-week follow-up to verify its effectiveness in improving the activation and adherence of older adults with COPD.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design

This study was a 24-week randomized controlled trial with a 12-week standardized Tele-PR intervention followed by a 12-week rehabilitation observation period. The remote intervention utilizes WeChat and the Pulmonary Internet Explorer Rehabilitation (PeR), a free WeChat public account previously developed by our research group (39). After completing the baseline assessment, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention (CC-CoI group) or control group (PR group). The random-assignment sequence was generated using computer software and managed by an independent research assistant who was not involved in participant recruitment, evaluation, or intervention. Data collection at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks was conducted by research assistants who were blinded to group assignments. For this study, the same assessor was responsible for collecting both the baseline and follow-up data. The study was approved by the ethical review of Jiangnan University (JNU20220310IRB17) and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial registry [ChiCTR1900028563]. All patients signed the paper-based informed consent form, and the checklist can be found in the Supplementary Table 1.

2.2 Participants and recruitment procedure

From September 1, 2023, to August 1, 2024, patients were recruited from the five hospitals in Wuxi using leaflets, posters, and face-to-face communication. The participants in this study received no rehabilitation treatment beyond the planned intervention. Eligible participants were 65 years and older, diagnosed with COPD based on established guidelines (FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7, FEV1 < 80% predicted (40)), and in a stable stage of the disease. Participants needed to use WeChat for communication. Exclusion criteria included mental disorders, cognitive impairment, limb dysfunction, unstable heart conditions, recent myocardial or cerebral infarction, inability to perform muscle strength tests, uncontrolled hypertension, or a history of syncope after exercise. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, who retained the right to withdraw at any time. Baseline data, including demographic, clinical information, and primary and secondary outcome measures, were collected by community physicians, nurses, and research assistants.

2.3 Sample size

The primary outcome of this study is patient activation, which is measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). With the test level of 0.05 on both sides and 80% test efficacy, the sample size estimation method was used for each group’s measurement data. Drawing on existing research, the effect size for the PAM-13 was set at 0.79 (4144). When the sample number of each group was equal, at least 36 cases were needed in each group. According to the estimation of 13% dropout rate in the study (39), at least 41 cases were needed in each group, and at least 82 cases were included in the sample size. This study involved the simultaneous recruitment of participants across five hospitals. Given the ongoing interest expressed by patients during this period, and in order to respect their willingness and protect their rights, the study allowed these patients to continue participating in the intervention. The final sample size was 102.

2.4 Development of the CC-CoI platform

This study develops CC-CoI platform based on the existing PeR. PeR has an “energy zone” component, which can be expanded to realize different interventions with different characteristics. In this study, the CC-CoI platform was added to the “energy zone” component. Within the present study the first four phases (0–3) of the mHealth Agile Development & Evaluation Lifecycle were completed (45). Phase Zero (Project Identification Phase): A focus group consisting of respiratory therapy specialists, clinicians, rehabilitation practitioners, nurses, software engineers, user interface designers, and older adults with COPD was formed. They conducted interviews to understand the obstacles of participants’ low adherence with Tele-PR programs and key expectations for the platform. Phase One (Development and Alpha Testing): This study developed the functional modules of CC-CoI platform according to the features of the CoI framework components (33), including the ‘Small Tarn West of the Knoll’, ‘Ageless Atrium’, and ‘Exploitation of Innovation’. Through focused interviews with older adults with COPD and healthcare professionals (HCPs), four themes for co-creating comics in the ‘Ageless Atrium’ module were identified. Subsequently, an image gallery (including images with correct and incorrect meanings) was constructed based on the thematic comic scene-keyword mapping chart to activate the text-to-image generation feature. The ‘Exploitation of Innovation’ module’s four virtual scenarios were tailored according to the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) (46) and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (47). As a result of the Alpha testing, we added the ‘Co-creation Discussion Room’ and ‘Day trip’ function modules. Phase Two (Beta testing): The results showed that the task completion rate of CC-CoI platform reached 100%, which indicated the complete feasibility of functional design. The CES average of 3.30 and the NPS average of 4.60 reflected high operational efficiency and user satisfaction. The specific content of the Alpha and Beta testing and program design is provided in Supplementary Table 2. Patients can see the part of the interface of the CC-CoI platform (Figure 1). In phase three, the platform’s intervention effectiveness was validated through a randomized controlled trial. In phase four, this study has not yet conducted post-market surveillance of the product.

Figure 1
Six smartphone screens display various interface designs for an app focused on wellness and activities. Screens include options for day trips, meal selections, exercise routines, meetings, and knowledge sharing. Visual elements include illustrations of people engaging in different activities, such as dining, exercising, and attending meetings. Text in Chinese accompanies icons and actions throughout the interfaces.

Figure 1. Part of the interface of the CC-CoI platform.

2.5 Intervention

2.5.1 PR group

A 12-week Tele-PR program, pre-validated by the research team, was adopted (39). This program was independently designed and subsequently verified for validity. The PR group was unable to access any of the other functions within the “energy zone” component. The core part of the intervention program included exercise training, respiratory training, medication knowledge, and diet guidance. Nurses assessed the patient’s condition and tailored a personalized exercise prescription. They instructed patients on how to register and log in to PeR, access evidence-based PR videos and text materials, complete and upload self-assessment reports, and communicate with peers and nurses through PeR to share experiences. Additionally, nurses maintained weekly contact with patients via phone or WeChat, providing professional guidance and advice based on the self-assessment reports uploaded by patients. If patients experienced acute deterioration in their condition, they could contact the nurses promptly through the online platform, and nurses would offer guidance based on the situation. The patient’s exercise situation was summarized by the nurses’ feedback every 4 weeks.

2.5.2 CC-CoI group

The CC-CoI group received not only the same Tele-PR intervention components as the PR group, but also a nurse-led CC-CoI platform intervention consisting of five modules:

1. ‘Day trip’: After logging into PeR, the nurse assisted patients to create their own virtual cartoon image and mark their daily schedule, including home-cooked meals, medication and exercise, etc.

2. ‘Small Tarn West of the Knoll’: The platform adopted the visual learning map to implement a three-week educational program on PR knowledge. In week 1, the nurse explained the meaning of medical data (physiological indicators and diagnostic criteria) and information about the disease (risk factors for recurrence and complications). In weeks 2 and 3, the nurse guided the patient to improve self-management skills (respiratory training, nutrition care, medication knowledge and management, rehabilitation exercise, identification of acute episodes and effective communication with HCPs, etc.) according to ‘Day trip’ module.

3. ‘Co-creation Discussion Room’: In week 4, the nurse helped the patient to review the previous content, introduced the function of the ‘Ageless Atrium’ module, taught the patient how to use it, and provided a thematic comic scene-keyword mapping chart.

4. ‘Ageless Atrium’: Completed in week 4. The nurse facilitated a group of 4–5 older adults with COPD to sequentially co-create four thematic comics (“Living with COPD,” “Exercise to Move,” “Safety Lessons from the Medicine Cabinet” and “COPD and Caring for Your Heart”), thereby completing digital labor and achieving digital socialization. The process was as follows: Through questioning, nurses guided patients to enter the keywords of PR knowledge according to their own rehabilitation experience and understanding, respectively. The platform automatically generated images, which could be integrated into a single background image called a draft image. The nurse organized the patients to express their understanding of pulmonary rehabilitation knowledge using the draft images. During this process, both the nurse and the doctor could correct the patients’ misconceptions and judgments of PR knowledge and guide them to jointly create a comic with an accurate theme. Doctors recorded shareable 30-s audio health education clips by long-pressing the microphone button. When patients’ lung rehabilitation knowledge input error rate exceeded 40%, the system automatically restarted the digital practice for that topic. The software engineers provided a clickable area for each generative image and linked to the corresponding PeR video material, making it easy for patients to click through for review and rehabilitation exercise. The demonstration video is attached in Supplementary Video 1.

5. ‘Exploitation of Innovation’: Completed in week 4. There were four virtual scenarios (Eco-serenity Oasis, Vogue Plaza Delight, Culinary Innovation Hub and Living Sphere) to train patients in identifying the risk factors for COPD recurrence. Each scenario contained 3 correct cartoon images of risk factors and 2 incorrect cartoon images. If the patient moved the cartoon images of the risk factor into the trash bin within 3 min, the task was considered complete. If the patient was unable to complete the action, the platform automatically removed the cartoon images of the risk factor. Risk factors and task settings are attached in Supplementary Table 2.

In weeks 8 and 12, the nurse guided the patients to repeat the training of the ‘Small Tarn West of the Knoll’, ‘Ageless Atrium’, and ‘Exploitation of Innovation’ modules. Depending on the patients’ needs, the nurse reviewed the patients’ exercise situation every 4 weeks, either in person or via WeChat video.

2.6 Outcome measures

2.6.1 Primary outcomes

Because CC-CoI platform aims to prepare and to activate individuals to take a role in adhering to Tele-PR program, we chose patient activation and adherence to Tele-PR as the primary outcomes. Patient activation was assessed using the PAM-13 (range 0–100). The PAM-13 measures individuals’ knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage their health across 4 levels of activation (levels 1–4), with higher scores indicating a higher activation level and a minimally important difference of 4 points (43, 48). Tele-PR adherence refers to the extent to which patients follow their prescribed exercise rehabilitation plan and how closely their adherence aligns with the plan developed by healthcare professionals. Specifically, Tele-PR adherence was collected through patients’ self-reports, and it was classified according to whether the proportion between the actual completed rehabilitation exercise and the plan reached 75%. Adherence was classified into high adherence and low adherence (49).

2.6.2 Secondary outcomes

Symptoms and disease effects were assessed using the CAT, which consists of 8 items. A higher total score indicates worse health status (50, 51). Furthermore, the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is defined as a decrease of ≥2 points in the CAT score and serves as a key indicator for assessing treatment response in older adults with COPD (52). Dyspnea was evaluated using the mMRC scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe dyspnea (53). Exercise self-efficacy was measured by the Ex-SRES, where higher score reflects greater confidence in maintaining exercise (54). Self-management ability was assessed using the CSMS, which includes 51 items, with higher scores indicating better self-management capacity (55, 56). Social support was measured using the PSSS, widely used in China, where a higher score indicates a higher perceived level of social support (57). Cognitive level was assessed using the COPD-Q, with higher accuracy rates representing better disease knowledge (58). Satisfaction with healthcare service was measured using a self-administered, single-item, 11-point Likert scale with the question: ‘How would you rate our services?’. The higher the score, the higher the patient’s satisfaction with the medical service.

2.7 Data collection and analysis

Patient demographics and baseline outcome measures were collected before the intervention (T0), with adherence to Tele-PR was measured in the first week (T1w). All outcome measures were collected at 12 and 24 weeks (T1, T2) of the intervention period.

An intention-to-treat analysis was employed, using the last observation carried forward method to handle missing data. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics version 27.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Baseline characteristics between the groups were compared using t-test or Mann–Whitney U tests, and categorical variables were analyzed using χ2 test. Changes in PAM-13, CAT, Ex-SRES, CSMS, PSSS, and COPD-Q scores over different intervention time points (T0, T1 and T2) were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, with significant interaction effects further examined through simple effects analysis. The mMRC score was analyzed using the Friedman test, with significant changes analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Between-group differences at various intervention time points (T1–T0, T2–T0) were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test, and exercise adherence in the Tele-PR group was compared using χ2 and McNemar tests. In addition, the difference in satisfaction with medical services between the two groups at the end of the 12-week intervention (T1) was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test.

3 Results

3.1 Basic demographic characteristics and measurements

Recruitment for this study commenced on September 1, 2023, with follow-ups completed by August 1, 2024. Figure 2 shows the CONSORT flowchart. The study recruited 102 older adults with COPD, randomly assigned to the CC-CoI group (n = 51) or the PR group (n = 51). At baseline, both groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics and outcome measures (p > 0.05), as presented in Table 1.

Figure 2
Flowchart depicting a study's participant flow. Assessed for eligibility: 193 participants from five hospitals. 91 excluded due to various reasons. 102 randomized into intervention (n=51) and control (n=51) groups. Each group received its allocated intervention. Intervention group lost 2 to follow-up; analyses were on 51. Control group lost 2 to follow-up; analyses were on 51.

Figure 2. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flowchart.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of baseline information between the two groups.

3.2 Primary outcome

The CC-CoI group exhibited a significant increase in PAM-13 scores, rising by 11.74 points by 24 weeks post-intervention (p < 0.001), compared to a non-significant increase of 1.82 points in the PR group (p = 0.166). This difference was significant at both the week 12 (F = 23.01, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.32) and week 24 (F = 50.11, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.50) (Table 2), with a significant group-by-time interaction effect observed (F = 42.77, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.46) (Table 3). The trend in PAM-13 scores over time is shown in Figure 3.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Means, standard deviations, and two-way ANOVA statistics for study variables.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Within-group differences and between-group differences of outcomes.

Figure 3
Line graphs display comparative scores over time for intervention and control groups. Metrics include PAM-13, CAT, mMRC, Ex-SRES, CSMS, PSSS, COPD-Q, and adherence rates. Each graph shows red circles for intervention and blue squares for control, with varying trends.

Figure 3. Evaluation indicators and their change over time.

Adherence rates among the PR group significantly declined from 58.82 to 31.37% by 24 weeks post-intervention (p < 0.001), while the CC-CoI group maintained stable adherence with no significant change (66.67% vs. 56.86%; p = 0.332) (Supplementary Table 3). However, the CC-CoI group demonstrated significantly higher adherence rates at both 12 weeks (p = 0.029) and 24 weeks (p = 0.010), as illustrated in Figure 3.

3.3 Secondary outcome

The CAT scores decreased in both groups by 24 weeks, with the CC-CoI group showing a more pronounced reduction (MD = −3.08; p < 0.001) than the PR group (MD = −1.47; p = 0.276). Although the reduction was greater in the CC-CoI group, the between-group difference was not significant at 24 weeks (F = 3.75, p = 0.058, η2 = 0.07) (Table 3). The CC-CoI group, however, saw a significant increase in the proportion of patients with a CAT score improvement of more than 2 points by 24 weeks (80.39% vs. 54.90%; p = 0.002), compared to the PR group (37.25% vs. 50.98%; p = 0.143), with a significant between-group difference at this time point (p = 0.002).

The mMRC score significantly decreased in the CC-CoI group (p < 0.001), with no significant change in the PR group (Supplementary Table 3). The CC-CoI group also showed a significant improvement in Ex-SRES scores at 24 weeks (MD = 12.29, p < 0.001), compared to a smaller increase in the PR group (MD = 5.22, p < 0.001), with a significant between-group difference (F = 84.01, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.63) (Table 2). The Ex-SRES score trends over time are shown in Figure 3, with a significant group-by-time interaction effect (F = 66.94, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.57) (Table 3).

The CC-CoI group experienced a significant improvement in CSMS scores at all post-test time points (MD = 36.63, P < 0.001), while the PR group’s scores improved initially at 12 weeks (MD = 9.90, p < 0.001) but declined by 24 weeks (MD = 8.39, P < 0.001) (Table 2). The CSMS score trends over time are presented in Figure 3, with a significant group-by-time interaction effect (F = 169.06, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.77) (Table 3).

Perceived social support significantly increased in the CC-CoI group compared to the PR group at both 12 weeks (F = 656.37, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.93) and 24 weeks (F = 1263.34, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.96). The CC-CoI group consistently showed an increase in perceived social support (MD = 10.06, p < 0.001), while the PR group’s scores improved initially but declined by 24 weeks (MD = 2.24, p < 0.001) (Table 2). Figure 3 shows the trends in perceived social support, with a significant group-by-time interaction effect (F = 397.96, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.89) (Table 3).

Lastly, the CC-CoI group demonstrated a significant increase in COPD-Q scores from baseline to 24 weeks (MD = 3.71, p < 0.001), compared to the PR group’s improvement of 1.61 points (p < 0.001). Significant between-group differences were observed at both 12 and 24 weeks (F = 12.34, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.20; F = 28.84, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.37, respectively) (Table 2), with a significant group-by-time interaction effect (F = 11.29, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.18) (Table 3). The COPD-Q score trends are depicted in Figure 3. At the end of the 12-week intervention, the CC-CoI group reported a higher satisfaction score than the PR group (MD = 2.31, p = 0.021).

4 Discussion

4.1 Findings

Our study demonstrated that the CC-CoI platform significantly improved activation, self-efficacy, self-management skills, perceived social support, and adherence to Tele-PR exercise among older adults with COPD. It relieved dyspnea symptoms and improved quality of life, suggesting a safe, feasible, and effective form of Tele-PR intervention. The findings support the role of theory-based co-creation in bolstering intervention effectiveness, highlighting its broad applicability in chronic disease management.

The results of this study demonstrated that the proportion of patients with high adherence in the intervention group was significantly greater than in the control group. This indicates that incorporating the co-creation component into the Tele-PR intervention positively influences the exercise rehabilitation adherence among older adults with COPD. This finding is consistent with the results of the study by Halvorsrud et al. (29). Similarly, research on diabetic patients conducted by Golin et al. (59) supported that enhancing patients’ comprehension of the content of the rehabilitation program may indirectly elevate adherence. Furthermore, Picorelli et al. (60) demonstrated that older adults’ adherence to rehabilitation exercises is affected by their level of disease cognitive. Through co-creating comics, patients have developed a clearer comprehension of health information and the diverse components of rehabilitation programs on the platform. In the ‘Small Tarn West of the Knoll’ module, the CC-CoI platform has boosted patients’ disease knowledge, thereby improving adherence to PR and ensuring treatment efficacy. Meanwhile, self-efficacy is also an important predictor of behavioral change. This study improved patients’ skills and problem-solving techniques through the use of cartoon images, co-creating comics, and other gamified formats. These activities allowed patients to more intuitively recognize their own progress, thereby enhancing their self-efficacy. Norouzkhani et al. (61) demonstrated that integrating self-management tasks for inflammatory bowel disease patients into gamified frameworks, such as point systems and rewards, enhances their sense of accomplishment and self-efficacy. Batch et al. (62) reported that using game-based mechanisms, such as feedback and challenges, to motivate diabetes patients through 12 task levels significantly improved their self-efficacy in self-management. In conclusion, integrating “co-creation” and “gamification” into Tele-PR can significantly improve rehabilitation outcomes and foster positive behavior change, thereby optimizing chronic disease management.

The results of this study indicated that the CC-CoI platform effectively alleviated patients’ breathing difficulties, which were closely linked to ensure the correctness of the patients’ daily rehabilitation training. Studies have demonstrated that exercise training plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of rehabilitation. From a pathophysiological mechanism perspective, standardized pulmonary rehabilitation training can directly address the small airway obstruction that causes breathing difficulties in COPD patients. This is achieved by enhancing the strength of respiratory muscles, such as the diaphragm, and improving the ventilation efficiency of small airways. Previous studies have sought to standardize rehabilitation exercises for COPD patients using wearable devices, particularly chest-worn devices that monitor exercise intensity and frequency during daily activities (63). However, widespread adoption of these devices among older adults with COPD remains limited. Owing to the diverse characteristics of exercise rehabilitation movements, wearable devices struggle to precisely identify the standardization of various movements. Additionally, problems such as poor wearing comfort and the leakage of privacy in exercise videos exist. Nevertheless, the ‘Ageless Atrium’ module effectively overcomes these limitations by employing an interactive feedback mechanism for co-creating comics. To ensure the accuracy of patients’ daily training, this research co-created the comic titled “Exercise to Move” as part of the ‘Ageless Atrium’ module. During the co-creating comics process, medical staff can promptly assess whether patients have mastered and applied pulmonary rehabilitation knowledge and whether their exercise movements are correct, using keywords input by the patients and descriptions of the rehabilitation actions. If movement errors are identified, a group discussion may be convened to correct them promptly. If patients forget the prescribed rehabilitation movements, they can use the video materials linked to the clickable area of the module for a rapid review, thereby improving rehabilitation outcomes further. This design also aligns with the perspective proposed by Park et al. (63) that non-invasive rehabilitation monitoring tools with high acceptability should be developed. However, this study found that the platform had no significant effect on CAT scores. As a complex and comprehensive indicator (64), CAT scores are influenced not only by shortness of breath but also by physiological, psychological, and environmental factors, many of which may not be fully addressed through remote interventions incorporating co-creation features. Secondly, the meta-analysis by Huang et al (31). reported that co-creation has a moderate positive effect on health-related outcomes (e.g., body mass index, blood pressure, and mortality rate), although the results showed substantial heterogeneity. Similarly, the meta-analysis by Halvorsrud et al. (29) found that the effect of co-creation on health outcomes was relatively small (0.25). These findings partially support the conclusions of our study. Furthermore, this study found that, by the 24th week, the proportion of patients in the intervention group whose CAT score improved by more than 2 points was significantly higher, while no significant change was observed in the control group. This suggests that the intervention group experienced a more pronounced improvement in the health status of older adults with COPD compared to the control group. However, the effects of the CC-CoI platform may require a longer follow-up period to be fully realized. Future research should more explicitly examine this temporal relationship and consider incorporating a biofeedback mechanism to address various aspects of patients’ quality of life more directly.

Additionally, the findings of this study confirmed that the training platform significantly improved the activation of older adults with COPD. Increased activation is strongly linked to the co-creation process. Similarly, some other researches also demonstrated that cooperative partnership formed by co-creation foster skills, confidence and experiences among participants, ultimately improving motivation (65, 66). Notably, research on co-creation in chronic disease management suggests that developing intervention strategies align with patients’ interests is accomplished by stakeholders through consultation on patient needs and perspectives. These efforts are largely confined to “say” and “do,” failing to materialize “make” (19, 67, 68), which involves patients expressing their ideas to others through the work. Previous studies have demonstrated that expressing one’s thoughts can increase participants’ engagement. Ravaccia et al. (69) reported that the use of digital support tools, which create a space for users to freely communicate and share their thoughts and experiences, effectively stimulates their willingness to seek help and support others, thereby enhancing their motivation to address psychological issues. Stoica et al. (70) also observed, in their exploration of emotional language during a state of reflective rest, that enabling cognitively intact older adults to express their thoughts freely via the “think-aloud” method effectively increased their propensity to use positive language. At the psychological level, this shift indirectly enhanced the older adults’ initiative to actively exhibit positive cognitive patterns. The co-creation design in this study addresses the absence of the “make” component in traditional models. In the ‘Ageless Atrium’ module, under the organization and guidance of nurses, patients can express their thoughts based on the multiple images generated by the platform. They combine their own disease-living experiences, the effects of exercise rehabilitation, and their medication-related doubts. The design of different thematic scenarios not only intuitively reduces patients’ difficulty in understanding COPD rehabilitation knowledge but also encourages them to share personal experiences and problems, thus stimulating emotional resonance among them. Additionally, this module uses the Socratic method (71) to foster patient creativity and understanding in the form of digital labor, which promotes knowledge sharing and equal collaboration. Digital labor refers to activities on platforms like social media that seem to be purely for leisure and entertainment yet inherently generate value creation (28, 72). The ‘Ageless Atrium’ module offered frequent opportunities for patients to share knowledge and participate in interactive dialog through co-creating an accurate and meaningful comic. This increased motivation for consistent PR exercise completion.

Self-management is essential for individuals with chronic illnesses and significantly impacts health outcomes (22). While telephone coaching has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing self-management among patients with mild COPD (22), the majority of interventions continue to depend on conventional education and skills training, overlooking the potential for co-creation. Heijmans et al. (79) identified that teaching models based solely on one-way knowledge transfer lack interactive feedback, which hinders patients’ ability to effectively apply relevant self-management skills when their condition recurs. Our study significantly enhanced patients’ self-management capabilities through the facilitation of interaction at the instructional, social, and cognitive levels via the co-creating comics in the ‘Ageless Atrium’ module. Srulovici et al. conducted a study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Diabetes Conversation Map™ Program. Their findings indicated that when facilitated by nurses, this program exerted a positive impact on patients’ clinical outcomes and health behaviors (71). Additionally, Qasim et al. (73) reported that educational interventions based on the Diabetes Conversation Map demonstrated significantly greater effectiveness in improving patients’ dietary control and blood glucose monitoring capabilities compared to conventional care. In our study, the ‘Small Tarn West of the Knoll’ module develops self-rescue and self-management skills characteristic of a smart patient by evolving diagnostic data into understandable risk factors and rehabilitation knowledge (74, 75). The ‘Ageless Atrium’ module enhances their deeper understanding of PR-related knowledge and self-management skills, utilizing co-creating comics in an environment that fosters open expression. The ‘Exploitation of Innovation’ module supports patients in applying their acquired knowledge to real-life scenarios through the practical engagement in the virtual scene. This study introduces a novel method for enhancing self-management in chronic disease contexts.

Social support offers robust emotional and resource stability, facilitating behavioral changes among older adults (76). This study indicated that the CC-CoI platform increased patients perceived social support via co-creation, reflecting the emotional and resource support patients received. Firstly, the ‘Ageless Atrium’ module enables patient connectivity on a social platform via co-creating comics, which promotes the exchange of knowledge and emotions, facilitates problem discussion, and aids in resolving operational challenges. The co-creation process bolsters patient social interaction, aids in building virtual communities, and increases the level of perceived social support among patients. Leask et al. (77) suggest that co-creation in research may bolster community relations, aligning with this study’s findings. Secondly, the co-creation within the platform not only enables patients to actively seek social support, but also transforms them from passive recipients to active contributors. Notably in this study, real-time medical guidance and feedback further solidify a cohesive support system, as evidenced by the sustained increase in perceived social support even 3 months post-intervention. Currently, virtual communities have emerged as the main platform for online engagement among older adults (78), and the behaviors exhibited by this demographic in such settings merit observation. The study reveals that older adults in virtual communities instinctively participate in reciprocal and altruistic behaviors. The emergence and evolution of virtual communities constitute a dynamic and gradual process. Initially, individuals start by familiarizing themselves with each other, a process that incrementally builds a network of community relationships. Through co-creation, older adults’ participation in decision-making is amplified (17). They personally experience the benefits brought by the virtual community, which in turn increases patient adhesion to the community. This heightened involvement strengthens the sense of belonging among patients, ultimately spurring reciprocal and altruistic behaviors. Within the community, mutual aid and altruistic behaviors significantly boost participation motivation and reinforce social support networks.

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology continues to evolve and mature, embedded AI is anticipated to be integrated into existing health management platforms. By enhancing the interaction logic and personalizing the adaptation capabilities of digital co-creation functions, AI will offer more precise technical support for the development and maintenance of health behaviors in older adults. In this context, the core objective of remote chronic disease management will further focus on empowering patients. Specifically, intervention strategies should not only be utilized to cultivate “active patients” with proactive health awareness, but also efforts should be dedicated to guiding them to evolve into “smart patients” who can interpret health data and make independent health-related decisions. This developmental pathway not only aligns with the technological evolution trend in the digital health domain, but also provides a crucial guarantee for the long-term management of older populations’ health behaviors in an aging society, while further pointing out an important direction for subsequent research and practical exploration.

4.2 Application

This study introduces a novel approach to managing COPD patients, utilizing tele interventions that are based on the co-creation and CoI framework. The study not only enhances behavioral intervention strategies for Tele-PR but also broadens the potential applications of remote medical interventions in chronic disease management. Furthermore, this research offers a pivotal method and tool for digital interventions among older adults communities. The tele rehabilitation platform, by creating virtual communities and incorporating co-creation modules, provides older adults with an easier rehabilitation route and social support network.

4.3 Limitations

This study has certain limitations. Firstly, the study’s regional sample from a Southeastern Chinese city may not represent the broader COPD patient populations in other regions or countries. Meanwhile, the patients included in this study have the problem of an unbalanced gender distribution. Future studies should employ larger, randomized samples to validate the platform. Secondly, Tele-PR adherence was assessed via subjective methods, potentially misrepresenting actual exercise engagement. Future studies may integrate digital indicators (e.g., application usage patterns or exercise completion timestamps) to enhance the objectivity of adherence-related data. Thirdly, this study did not conduct a detailed item analysis of the CAT scores. Future research should explore the response patterns of different symptom dimensions to the intervention measures, in order to achieve more profound findings. Fourthly, the 12-week follow-up is inadequate for assessing long-term efficacy. Extended follow-up is needed for comprehensive evaluation of the CC-CoI platform in chronic disease management.

5 Conclusion

This study demonstrates that digital co-creation enhances the active participation of older adults in Tele-PR and fosters the development of virtual communities along with the onset of altruistic behaviors in individuals. This approach encourages patients to apply their knowledge for self-management of health behaviors, which in turn, enhances their adherence to rehabilitation exercise and leads to better health outcomes. Furthermore, the platform’s digital co-creation capabilities can be enhanced with embedded AI to promote healthy behaviors in older adults.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the ethical review committee of Jiangnan University (JNU20220310IRB17). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

XH: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Software, Data curation, Visualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration. XS: Visualization, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation. MS: Formal analysis, Methodology, Data curation, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. YH: Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Validation. JN: Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Software, Methodology. JG: Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SF: Data curation, Validation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YJ: Funding acquisition, Resources, Validation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 72274080) and China Medical Foundation (no. 2024CMFA07).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1708607/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Soriano, JB, Kendrick, PJ, Paulson, KR, Gupta, V, Abrams, EM, Adedoyin, RA, et al. Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Respir Med. (2020) 8:585–96. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Iheanacho, I, Zhang, S, King, D, Rizzo, M, and Ismaila, AS. Economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic literature review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. (2020) 15:439–60. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S234942

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Chen, S, Kuhn, M, Prettner, K, Yu, F, Yang, T, Bärnighausen, T, et al. The global economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 204 countries and territories in 2020–50: a health-augmented macroeconomic modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. (2023) 11:e1183–93. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00217-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kouri, A, Gupta, S, Straus, SE, and Sale, JEM. Exploring the perspectives and experiences of older adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease toward Mobile health: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. (2023) 25:e45955. doi: 10.2196/45955

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Adeloye, D, Chua, S, Lee, C, Basquill, C, Papana, A, Theodoratou, E, et al. Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: systematic review and meta–analysis. J Glob Health. (2015) 5:020415. doi: 10.7189/jogh.05.020415

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lamberton, CE, and Mosher, CL. Review of the evidence for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness. Respir Care. (2024) 69:686–96. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11541

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Selzler, A-M, Wald, J, Sedeno, M, Jourdain, T, Janaudis-Ferreira, T, Goldstein, R, et al. Telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation: a review of the literature and an example of a nationwide initiative to improve the accessibility of pulmonary rehabilitation. Chron Respir Dis. (2018) 15:41–7. doi: 10.1177/1479972317724570

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Alghamdi, SM, Alsulayyim, AS, Alasmari, AM, Philip, KEJ, Buttery, SC, Banya, WAS, et al. Oscillatory positive expiratory pressure therapy in COPD (O-COPD): a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. (2023) 78:136–43. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219077

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Michaelchuk, W, Oliveira, A, Marzolini, S, Nonoyama, M, Maybank, A, Goldstein, R, et al. Design and delivery of home-based telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation programs in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform. (2022) 162:104754. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104754

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Zanaboni, P, Hoaas, H, Aarøen Lien, L, Hjalmarsen, A, and Wootton, R. Long-term exercise maintenance in COPD via telerehabilitation: a two-year pilot study. J Telemed Telecare. (2017) 23:74–82. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15625545

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Jones, AW, Taylor, A, Gowler, H, O’Kelly, N, Ghosh, S, and Bridle, C. Systematic review of interventions to improve patient uptake and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD. ERJ Open Res. (2017) 3:00089–2016. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00089-2016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Alghamdi, SM. Content, mechanism, and outcome of effective telehealth solutions for Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: a narrative review. Healthcare. (2023) 11:3164. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11243164

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Alghamdi, SM, Rajah, AMA, Aldabayan, YS, Aldhahir, AM, Alqahtani, JS, and Alzahrani, AA. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients’ acceptance in E-health clinical trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:5230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105230

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Jiang, Y, Nuerdawulieti, B, Chen, Z, Guo, J, Sun, P, Chen, M, et al. Effectiveness of patient decision aid supported shared decision-making intervention in in-person and virtual hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare (2024) 30:1532–42. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231156631

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Alison, JA, McKeough, ZJ, Johnston, K, McNamara, RJ, Spencer, LM, Jenkins, SC, et al. Australian and New Zealand pulmonary rehabilitation guidelines. Respirology. (2017) 22:800–19. doi: 10.1111/resp.13025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cuevas, H, Heitkemper, E, Huang, Y-C, Jang, DE, García, AA, and Zuñiga, JA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient activation in people living with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns. (2021) 104:2200–12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Lundell, S, Toots, A, Sönnerfors, P, Halvarsson, A, and Wadell, K. Participatory methods in a digital setting: experiences from the co-creation of an eHealth tool for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. (2022) 22:68. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01806-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. North, M, Bourne, S, Green, B, Chauhan, AJ, Brown, T, Winter, J, et al. A randomised controlled feasibility trial of E-health application supported care vs. usual care after exacerbation of COPD: the RESCUE trial. Npj Digit Med. (2020) 3:145. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00347-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. An, Q, Sandlund, M, Agnello, D, McCaffrey, L, Chastin, S, Helleday, R, et al. A scoping review of co-creation practice in the development of non-pharmacological interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a health CASCADE study. Respir Med. (2023) 211:107193. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107193

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. McCullough, AR, Ryan, C, Macindoe, C, Yii, N, Bradley, JM, O’Neill, B, et al. Behavior change theory, content and delivery of interventions to enhance adherence in chronic respiratory disease: a systematic review. Respir Med. (2016) 116:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.05.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mohr, DC, Burns, MN, Schueller, SM, Clarke, G, and Klinkman, M. Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2013) 35:332–8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Jolly, K, Sidhu, MS, Hewitt, CA, Coventry, PA, Daley, A, Jordan, R, et al. Self management of patients with mild COPD in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. (2018):k2241. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2241

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Greenhalgh, T, Jackson, C, Shaw, S, and Janamian, T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. (2016) 94:392–429. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Robert, G, Cornwell, J, Locock, L, Purushotham, A, Sturmey, G, and Gager, M. Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. BMJ. (2015):g7714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7714

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Agnello, DM, Loisel, QEA, An, Q, Balaskas, G, Chrifou, R, Dall, P, et al. Establishing a health CASCADE–curated open-access database to consolidate knowledge about co-creation: novel artificial intelligence–assisted methodology based on systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res. (2023) 25:e45059. doi: 10.2196/45059

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bernuzzi, C, Piccardo, MA, Marsilio, M, Calcaterra, V, Zuccotti, G, and Guglielmetti, C. Value co-creation in telemedicine: a qualitative study of pediatricians’ expectations regarding Telehomecare implementation in an Italian pediatric hospital. J Healthc Leadersh. (2024) 16:485–500. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S467155

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ramaswamy, V, and Ozcan, K. What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. J Bus Res. (2018) 84:196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Ruyan,. Fuchs’ digital labour theory and its value. Adv Soc Sci. (2024) 13:890–4. doi: 10.12677/ASS.2024.132120

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Halvorsrud, K, Kucharska, J, Adlington, K, Rüdell, K, Brown Hajdukova, E, Nazroo, J, et al. Identifying evidence of effectiveness in the co-creation of research: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the international healthcare literature. J Public Health. (2021) 43:197–208. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz126

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Mansson, L, Wiklund, M, Öhberg, F, Danielsson, K, and Sandlund, M. Co-creation with older adults to improve user-experience of a smartphone self-test application to assess balance function. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:3768. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113768

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Huang, X, Hou, Y, Sun, M, Nan, J, Zou, X, Fu, S, et al. Effectiveness of co-creation for chronic disease management: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Health Promot. (2025) 39:1068–81. doi: 10.1177/08901171251333564

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Messiha, K, Chinapaw, MJM, Ket, HCFF, An, Q, Anand-Kumar, V, Longworth, GR, et al. Systematic review of contemporary theories used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health. J Public Health. (2023) 45:723–37. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad046

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wertz, REH. Learning presence within the Community of Inquiry framework: An alternative measurement survey for a four-factor model. Internet High Educ. (2022) 52:100832. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100832

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Junus, K, Santoso, HB, and Ahmad, M. Experiencing the community of inquiry framework using asynchronous online role-playing in computer-aided instruction class. Educ Inf Technol. (2022) 27:2283–309. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10670-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Mills, J, Yates, K, Harrison, H, Woods, C, Chamberlain-Salaun, J, Trueman, S, et al. Using a community of inquiry framework to teach a nursing and midwifery research subject: An evaluative study. Nurse Educ Today. (2016) 43:34–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Fusco, F, Marsilio, M, and Guglielmetti, C. Co-creation in healthcare: framing the outcomes and their determinants. J Serv Manag. (2023) 34:1–26. doi: 10.1108/JOSM-06-2021-0212

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Fu, L, Pei, T, Yang, J, and Han, J. How smart senior care can achieve value co-creation: evidence from China. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:973439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.973439

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Singer, I, Klatte, IS, De Vries, R, Van Der Lugt, R, and Gerrits, E. Using co-design to develop a tool for shared goal-setting with parents in speech and language therapy. Int J Lang Commun Disord. (2022) 57:1281–303. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12753

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Jiang, Y, Liu, F, Guo, J, Sun, P, Chen, Z, Li, J, et al. Evaluating an intervention program using WeChat for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. (2020) 22:e17089. doi: 10.2196/17089

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Fang, L, Gao, P, Bao, H, Tang, X, Wang, B, Feng, Y, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a nationwide prevalence study. Lancet Respir Med. (2018) 6:421–30. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30103-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Howell, D, Pond, GR, Bryant-Lukosius, D, Powis, M, McGowan, PT, Makuwaza, T, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of self-management education and coaching on patient activation for managing Cancer treatment toxicities. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. (2023) 21:247–256.e8. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7095

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Nøst, TH, Steinsbekk, A, Bratås, O, and Grønning, K. Twelve-month effect of chronic pain self-management intervention delivered in an easily accessible primary healthcare service – a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. (2018) 18:1012. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3843-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Ngooi, BX, Packer, TL, Kephart, G, Warner, G, Koh, KWL, Wong, RCC, et al. Validation of the patient activation measure (PAM-13) among adults with cardiac conditions in Singapore. Qual Life Res. (2017) 26:1071–80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1412-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Grønning, K, Skomsvoll, JF, Rannestad, T, and Steinsbekk, A. The effect of an educational programme consisting of group and individual arthritis education for patients with polyarthritis—a randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. (2012) 88:113–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wilson, K, Bell, C, Wilson, L, and Witteman, H. Agile research to complement agile development: a proposal for an mHealth research lifecycle. Npj Digit Med. (2018) 1:46. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0053-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Buele, J, Varela-Aldás, JL, and Palacios-Navarro, G. Virtual reality applications based on instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) for cognitive intervention in older adults: a systematic review. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. (2023) 20:168. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01292-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Doll, H, Duprat-Lomon, I, Ammerman, E, and Sagnier, P-P. Validity of the St George’s respiratory questionnaire at acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: Comparison with the Nottingham health profile. Qual Life Res. (2003) 12:117–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1022280532276

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Hibbard, JH, Mahoney, ER, Stockard, J, and Tusler, M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. (2005) 40:1918–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kaasgaard, M, Rasmussen, DB, Andreasson, KH, Hilberg, O, Løkke, A, Vuust, P, et al. Use of singing for lung health as an alternative training modality within pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. (2022) 59:2101142. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01142-2021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Jones, PW, Harding, G, Berry, P, Wiklund, I, Chen, W-H, and Kline, LN. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment test. Eur Respir J. (2009) 34:648–54. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00102509

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Matsuda, T, Taniguchi, H, Ando, M, Kondoh, Y, Kimura, T, Kataoka, K, et al. COPD A ssessment T Est for measurement of health status in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A cross-sectional study. Respirology. (2017) 22:721–7. doi: 10.1111/resp.12936

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Song, Q, Liu, C, Liu, L, Li, X, Cheng, W, Zeng, Y, et al. Symptom scores of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and responses to different inhalation drug treatments. J Chin Physician. (2023) 25:964–9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20230526-00765

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Munari, AB, Gulart, AA, Dos Santos, K, Venâncio, RS, Karloh, M, and Mayer, AF. Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale in GOLD classification better reflects physical activities of daily living. Respir Care. (2018) 63:77–85. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05636

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Davis, AHT, Figueredo, AJ, Fahy, BF, and Rawiworrakul, T. Reliability and validity of the exercise self-regulatory efficacy scale for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Heart Lung. (2007) 36:205–16. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.08.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Wang, L, Guo, Y, Wang, M, and Zhao, Y. A mobile health application to support self-management in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. (2021) 35:90–101. doi: 10.1177/0269215520946931

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Zhou, Y-M, Chen, S-Y, Tian, J, Cui, J-Y, Li, X-C, Hong, W, et al. Development and validation of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire in China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. (2013) 17:1645–51. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0995

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Zimet, GD, Powell, SS, Farley, GK, Werkman, S, and Berkoff, KA. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. (1990) 55:610–7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5503&4_17

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Maples, P, Franks, A, Ray, S, Stevens, AB, and Wallace, LS. Development and validation of a low-literacy chronic obstructive pulmonary disease knowledge questionnaire (COPD-Q). Patient Educ Couns. (2010) 81:19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Golin, CE, DiMatteo, MR, and Gelberg, L. The role of patient participation in the doctor visit: implications for adherence to diabetes care. Diabetes Care. (1996) 19:1153–64. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.10.1153

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Picorelli, AMA, Pereira, LSM, Pereira, DS, Felício, D, and Sherrington, C. Adherence to exercise programs for older people is influenced by program characteristics and personal factors: a systematic review. J Physiother. (2014) 60:151–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.06.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Norouzkhani, N, Norouzi, S, Faramarzi, M, Bahari, A, Shirvani, JS, Eslami, S, et al. Developing and evaluating a gamified self-management application for inflammatory bowel disease using the ADDIE model and Sukr framework. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. (2025) 25:11. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02842-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Batch, BC, Spratt, SE, Blalock, DV, Benditz, C, Weiss, A, Dolor, RJ, et al. General behavioral engagement and changes in clinical and cognitive outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes using the Time2Focus Mobile app for diabetes education: pilot evaluation. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23:e17537. doi: 10.2196/17537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Park, HY, Kong, S, Lee, M, Ryu, H, Hamakawa, Y, Luppi, F, et al. Digital health technologies for improving the management of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front Digit Health. (2025) 7:1640585. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1640585

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Wiklund, I, Berry, P, Lu, KX, Fang, J, and Fu, C. The Chinese translation of COPD Assessment test (CAT) provides a valid and reliable measurement of COPD health status in Chinese COPD patients In: B67. Exercise assessment is critical in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. New Orleans American Thoracic Society (2010). A3575–5.

Google Scholar

65. Maenhout, L, Verloigne, M, Cairns, D, Cardon, G, Crombez, G, Melville, C, et al. Co-creating an intervention to promote physical activity in adolescents with intellectual disabilities: lessons learned within the move it, move ID!-project. Res Involv Engagem. (2023) 9:10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00420-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. on behalf of the GrandStand, Safe Step and Teenage Girls on the Move Research GroupsLeask, CF, Sandlund, M, Skelton, DA, Altenburg, TM, Cardon, G, et al. Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Res Involv Engagem. (2019) 5:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9,

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Rosland, A-M, Piette, JD, Trivedi, R, Lee, A, Stoll, S, Youk, AO, et al. Effectiveness of a health coaching intervention for patient-family dyads to improve outcomes among adults with diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. (2022) 5:e2237960. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37960

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Marcus, A. Design, user experience, and usability: Interactive experience design: 4th international conference, DUXU 2015, held as part of HCI international 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, august 2–7, 2015, proceedings, part III. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2015).

Google Scholar

69. Ravaccia, GG, Johnson, SL, Morgan, N, Lereya, ST, and Edbrooke-Childs, J. Experiences of using the digital support tool MeeToo: mixed methods study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. (2022) 5:e37424. doi: 10.2196/37424

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Stoica, T, Andrews, ES, Deffner, AM, Griffith, C, Grilli, MD, and Andrews-Hanna, JR. Speaking well and feeling good: age-related differences in the affective language of resting state thought. Affect Sci. (2024) 5:141–59. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00239-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Srulovici, E, Leventer-Roberts, M, Curtis, B, He, X, Hoshen, M, Rotem, M, et al. Long-term effectiveness of the diabetes conversation map™ program on health outcomes: a case–control retrospective cohort study. J Adv Nurs. (2020) 76:2299–310. doi: 10.1111/jan.14439

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Ley, M, and Rambukkana, N. Touching at a distance: digital intimacies, haptic platforms, and the ethics of consent. Sci Eng Ethics. (2021) 27:63. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00338-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Qasim, R, Masih, S, Yousafzai, MT, Shah, H, Manan, A, Shah, Y, et al. Diabetes conversation map – a novel tool for diabetes management self-efficacy among type 2 diabetes patients in Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Endocr Disord. (2020) 20:88. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-00572-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Chen, Y, Yang, L, Hu, H, Chen, J, and Shen, B. How to become a smart patient in the era of precision medicine? In: B Shen, editor. Healthcare and big data management. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Singapore: Springer Singapore (2017). 1–16.

Google Scholar

75. Gee, PM, Greenwood, DA, Kim, KK, Perez, SL, Staggers, N, and DeVon, HA. Exploration of the e-patient phenomenon in nursing informatics. Nurs Outlook. (2012) 60:e9–e16. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Pan, X, Huang, Q, Zhang, Z, Liu, H, and Xiao, H. The effects of resourcefulness-based instrumental reminiscence therapy on psychological adjustment in nursing home residents: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. (2024) 53:afad243. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad243

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Leask, CF, Sandlund, M, Skelton, DA, and Chastin, SF. Co-creating a tailored public health intervention to reduce older adults’ sedentary behaviour. Health Educ J. (2017) 76:595–608. doi: 10.1177/0017896917707785

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Ing, JBM, Tan, MP, Whitney, J, Tiong, IK, and Singh, DKA. Acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of WE-SURF™: a virtual supervised group-based fall prevention exercise program among older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2024) 36:125. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02759-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Heijmans, M, Waverijn, R, Rademakers, J, Van Der Vaart, R, and Rijken, M. Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management. Patient Educ Couns. (2015) 98:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, randomized controlled trial, co-creation, the CoI framework, telemedicine

Citation: Huang X, Song X, Sun M, Hou Y, Nan J, Gao J, Fu S and Jiang Y (2025) Effectiveness of digital co-creation platform in remote pulmonary rehabilitation for older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial. Front. Public Health. 13:1708607. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1708607

Received: 19 September 2025; Accepted: 28 October 2025;
Published: 10 November 2025.

Edited by:

Júlio Belo Fernandes, Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Portugal

Reviewed by:

Antonios Kontaxakis, 414 Military Hospital of Special Diseases, Greece
Saeed M. Mardy Alghamdi, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia

Copyright © 2025 Huang, Song, Sun, Hou, Nan, Gao, Fu and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yuyu Jiang, ZG9jdG9yeXV5dUBqaWFuZ25hbi5lZHUuY24=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.