Abstract
The aim was to compare the in-vitro antibacterial effectiveness of two herbal extracts (a) Saussurea-costus (S. costus) and (b) Melaleuca-alternifolia (M. alternifolia) against Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). Aqueous extracts from M. alternifolia were prepared by adding 2 grams of S. costus and M. alternifolia, respectively to 100 ml distilled water. Bacterial strains of P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans were treated into 3 groups. In groups 1 and 2, bacterial strains were treated with aqueous extracts of S. costus and M. alternifolia, respectively. In the control-group, bacterial strains were exposed to distilled water. Antibacterial activity of the samples and nanoparticles was determined. The minimum-inhibitory-concentration (MIC) values were determined using the microdilution method. P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. The MIC for all bacterial strains treated with S. costus was significantly higher than that of M. alternifolia (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in MIC for strains of P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans treated with S. costus. For bacterial strains treated with M. alternifolia, the MIC was significantly higher for P. gingivalis compared with E. faecalis and S. mutans strains (P < 0.01). There was no difference in MIC for E. faecalis and S. mutans strains treated with M. alternifolia. The in-vitro antibacterial efficacy of M. alternifolia is higher than S. costus against P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans.
Introduction
“Phytotherapy” is a term that is used in the field of medicine in which, either herbs or their extracts are used as either health promotion agents or to treat diseases [1]. This form of therapy encompasses Ayurvedic medicine, anthroposophic medicine, and traditional Chinese medicine. Herbs and their extracts such as the Salvadora persica chewing stick or “miswak” and Azadirachta indica or “neem” are often in the form of toothpastes and oral rinses for routine oral hygiene maintenance to eradicate dental plaque from teeth surfaces [2, 3]. In addition, these natural products are also known to exhibit antibacterial action against pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) [4–9]. Although numerous studies have investigated the bactericidal efficacy of herbal extracts of neem and miswak; other natural products that have been reported to exhibit antibacterial properties include Saussurea costus (S. costus) and Melaleuca alternifolia (M. alternifolia) [10, 11].
The S. costus (India costus), is a member of the Asteraceae family and is commonly used in countries such as Saudi Arabia, and India for different medical issues such as asthma, breast and hepatic cancer and thyroid diseases [12–14]. It is also known as costus, putchuk, or kuth. Likewise, M. alternifolia, also known as “tea tree oil” exhibits antimicrobial effects against microbes including Staphylococcus aureus, S. mutans and Candida albicans [15–18]; and promotes wound healing [18]. It is well-known that pathogenic microbes play a critical part in etiopathogenesis of dental caries and periodontal and peri-implant diseases [19–22]. The authors stringently reviewed indexed literature and observed that to date, there are no clinical and/or experimental studies that have assessed the antibacterial efficacy of S. costus and M. alternifolia against oral pathogenic bacteria. We hypothesize that S. costus and M. alternifolia exhibit bactericidal effects against P. gingivalis, S. mutans and E. faecalis with no difference in efficacy between the two herbals.
With this background, the objective was to in vitro investigate the antibacterial effectiveness of S. costus and M. alternifolia against P. gingivalis, S. mutans, and E. faecalis.
Methods
Ethical Statement and Informed Consent
Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Review Committee of the Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, ArRiyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This is a laboratory-based investigation; therefore, the study was exempted from a written informed consent requirement.
Sample Collection and Preparation of Aqueous Extracts
Samples of S. costus and M. alternifolia were purchased from a local-market in Riyadh, Saudi-Arabia. The samples were rinsed with distilled water, air-dried, and ground into a fine powder using a milling machine (IKA Werke Laboratory Equipment, Staufen, Germany). The milled materials were stored at room temperature in sealed plastic boxes until further analysis. Aqueous extracts from M. alternifolia were prepared by adding 2 grams of S. costus and M. alternifolia, respectively to 100 ml distilled water. Heat treatment was performed on the aqueous extract for 15 min at 80°C to stop the enzyme activity. The samples were filtered (Whatman candidate #1 pore size 125mm, Whatman, Maidstone, United Kingdom) and stored at 4°C till use. All samples were assessed within 24 h.
Study Groups and Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity
Bacterial strains of P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans were therapeutically classified into 3 groups. In groups 1 and 2, bacterial strains were treated with aqueous extracts of S. costus and M. alternifolia, respectively. In the control-group, bacterial strains were exposed to distilled water. Antibacterial activity was assessed using well agar diffusion method [23]. Three types of bacterial strains, P. gingivalis (ATCC® 53978), E. faecalis (ATCC® 29212) and S. mutans (ATCC® 55676) were used. Microbial cultures were sub-cultured on Mueller-Hinton-Agar. 0.2 ml of bacteria strain (1.5 X 108 CFU/ml) was uniformly swabbed on agar plates using sterile-swabs; and 3 spaced wells (each 4 mm in diameter) were made per plate at the culture agar surface using a sterile metal-cork borer. In each well, 0.2 ml of extract was placed under aseptic conditions, and kept at room temperature for 1 h. Sterile distilled water was used as the negative reference control. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24-h. Inhibition zones, which appeared as a clear area around the wells were evaluated.
Assessment of MIC
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined via microdilution method as described by Arends et al. [24]. In summary, 10 ml of a bacterial strain containing 1.5 x 108 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) was used. Different concentrations of nanoparticles were added to the test tubes containing the bacterial strains and incubated for 24 h. After incubation, the MIC values were obtained by checking the turbidity of the bacterial growth. The MIC value corresponded to the concentration that inhibited 99% of bacterial growth.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical comparisons were done using a software (SPSS 20, Chicago, I.L. United States). Group comparisons in terms of reduction in CFU/ml in the study groups was done using the one-way analysis of variance. For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni post-hoc correction test was also performed. P-values below 0.01 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Antibacterial Activity of S. costus and M. alternifolia
Aqueous extracts of M. alternifolia demonstrated a significantly high antimicrobial activity against strains of P. gingivalis (P < 0.001), E. faecalis (P < 0.01) and S. mutans (P < 0.001) compared with extracts of S. costus (Figure 1). The antibacterial activity of M. alternifolia was significantly higher against E. faecalis and S. mutans compared with that against P. gingivalis. There was no significant difference in the antibacterial efficacy of M. alternifolia against E. faecalis and S. mutans (Figure 1). There was no bactericidal activity observed in the control-group compared with strains that were treated with S. costus and M. alternifolia.
Figure 1
Antibacterial efficacy of Melaleuca alternifolia and Saussurea costus.
MIC of S. costus and M. alternifolia in Relation to Their Bactericidal Efficacy
The MIC for all bacterial strains treated with S. costus was significantly than that of M. alternifolia (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the MIC for strains of P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans treated with S. costus. For bacterial strains treated with M. alternifolia, the MIC was significantly higher for P. gingivalis compared with E. faecalis and S. mutans strains (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the MIC for E. faecalis and S. mutans strains treated with M. alternifolia. The MIC for S. costus and M. alternifolia are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
| Bacterial strain | Porphyromonas gingivalis | Enterococcus faecalis | Streptococcus mutans |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saussurea costus | 56.2 ± 9.6 g/ml* | 56.6 ± 7.6 g/ml* | 80.5 ± 10.2 g/ml* |
| Melaleuca alternifolia | 29.5 ± 1.6 g/ml | 13.5 ± 2.5 g/ml† | 15.5 ± 3.7 g/ml† |
Minimum inhibitory concentrations of Saussurea costus and Melaleuca alternifolia in relation to their bactericidal efficacy.
Compared with the same bacterial strain treated with M. alternifolia (P < 0.001).
Compared with P-gingivalis strain treated with M. alternifolia (P < 0.01).
Discussion
It has already been reported that S. costus and M. alternifolia possess antibacterial effects [9]; however, to the authors knowledge from pertinent indexed literature, the present study is the first one to compare the antibacterial efficacy of S. costus and M. alternifolia against common oral pathogenic bacteria (P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans). The present experiment was based on the hypothesis that S. costus and M. alternifolia exhibit bactericidal effects against P. gingivalis, S. mutans and E. faecalis with no difference in efficacy between the two herbals. The results of the present experiment are partially in agreement with the proposed hypothesis as both herbal extracts (S. costus and M. alternifolia) demonstrated antibacterial efficacy against the tested bacterial strains. However, this experiment showed that antibacterial effectiveness of M. alternifolia was superior to that of S. costus in terms of MIC and identification of inhibition zone. It is challenging to determine the precise factor/s that may have contributed in this regard; however, different theories may be proposed. Firstly, tea tree oil or M. alternifolia is a well-known anti-inflammatory and antiseptic agent. Moreover, M. alternifolia inhibits bacterial respiration and disrupts permeability barrier of microbial cell membrane [17]; and at the same time increases the leakage of potassium ions in both Gram-negative and -positive bacteria [17]. These are possible factors that may be associated with the superior antibacterial effectiveness of M. alternifolia over S. costus. The current experiment showed that the MIC was significantly higher for P. gingivalis compared with E. faecalis and S. mutans strains for bacterial strains treated with M. alternifolia. One justification for this is that a standard concentration of M. alternifolia of 0.2% such as that used in the present investigation is insufficient to demonstrate antibacterial effectiveness against all types of bacteria. It is therefore hypothesized that M. alternifolia with used in concentrations higher than 0.2% demonstrates antibacterial effectiveness and creates inhibition zones that are statistically similar to those created for other bacteria such as E. faecalis and S. mutans. Further studies are needed to test this hypothesis.
From a clinical perspective, it is well-known that periodontopathogenic bacteria such as P. gingivalis play a role in the etiopathogenesis and progression of oral inflammatory conditions such as periodontitis [25–27]. Traditionally, mechanical instrumentation of periodontal sulci and related teeth/root surfaces is performed for the management of periodontitis [25]; and postoperative oral rinses such as 0.12% Chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) are often prescribed to patients in order to facilitate healing. However, this protocol is difficult to adopt particularly in patients with chlorhexidine allergy (CA). Although CA is a rare condition, it may be a source of distress to patients as it induces type-IV hypersensitivity reactions such as erythema in gingival tissues, burning sensation in the mouth and stomatitis [28, 29]. In a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), Al-Zawawi et al. [30] investigated the postoperative anti-inflammatory efficacy of herbal-based oral rinses after non-surgical instrumentation for the management of periodontal inflammation in patients with chlorhexidine allergy. The results showed that herbal-based oral rinses are suitable substitutes to 0.12% CG as post-operative prescriptions following periodontal treatment [30]. The present in-vitro results applaud the results reported by Al-Zawawi et al. [30]; and suggest that S. costus based mouthwashes can be used for the management of periodontal inflammatory conditions as a substitute to 0.12% CHX. However, this needs additional well-designed and power adjusted RCTs.
A major limitation of the present study is that the results were entirely based on in-vitro evaluation of aqueous extracts from both herbs. Several clinical studies have shown that habits such as tobacco smoking and systemic diseases including poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus are risk factors of periodontitis and dental caries [31–38]. Such risk-factors are known to compromise outcomes of oral therapeutic interventions [39]; and promotion of microbial colonization in the supra- and subgingival oral biofilm [40, 41]. In this context, it remains debatable whether or not periodontal therapy (surgical or non-surgical) and restoration of carious teeth with adjunct use of oral rinses derived from S. costus and M. alternifolia is effective in the restoration of a clinically acceptable oral health status. Further studies, predominantly RCTs are needed.
Conclusion
In-vitro antibacterial efficacy of M. alternifolia is higher than S. costus against P. gingivalis, E. faecalis and S. mutans. From a clinical perspective, it is speculated that oral dentifrices based on M. alternifolia extracts can play a role in the maintenance of oral health and treatment of oral diseases such as periodontitis.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
MB and SA: study design and manuscript writing and revisions. BH: methodology and manuscript writing and editing. MA: statistical analysis, methodology, and manuscript writing and editing. AM: methodology and manuscript writing and editing. KA: supervision, methodology, and manuscript writing and revisions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
FalzonCCBalabanovaA. Phytotherapy: an introduction to herbal medicine. Prim Care. (2017) 44:217–27. 10.1016/j.pop.2017.02.001
2.
AlmasAKAlmasK. Miswak (Salvadora persica chewing stick): the natural toothbrush revisited. Odontostomatol Trop. (2014) 37:27–39.
3.
DhingraKVandanaKL. Effectiveness of azadirachta indica (neem) mouthrinse in plaque and gingivitis control: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. (2017) 15:4–15. 10.1111/idh.12191
4.
VennilaKElanchezhiyanSIlavarasuS. Efficacy of 10% whole azadirachta indica (neem) chip as an adjunct to scaling and root planning in chronic periodontitis: a clinical and microbiological study. Indian J Dent Res. (2016) 27:15–21. 10.4103/0970-9290.179808
5.
SekarSJacobSSuthanthiranTKDhasthaheerSVikramanSKaliappanK. Characterization and formulation of miswak film for the treatment of chronic periodontitis: an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. (2020) 12:S199–203. 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_59_20
6.
Al-ObaidaMIAl-EssaMAAsiriAAAl-RahlaAA. Effectiveness of a 20% miswak extract against a mixture of Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis. Saudi Med J. (2010) 31:640–3.
7.
KalpavrikshaAJSiddaiahSBBilichodmathSPrabhakaraSRaoHH. Comparative evaluation of antibacterial effect of GIC containing chlorhexidine and miswak on Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in early childhood caries children: a PCR study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. (2021) 14:229–34. 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1942
8.
HeymanLHouri-HaddadYHeymanSNGinsburgIGleitmanYFeuersteinO. Combined antioxidant effects of neem extract, bacteria, red blood cells and Lysozyme: possible relation to periodontal disease. BMC Complement Altern Med. (2017) 17:399. 10.1186/s12906-017-1900-3
9.
LalemanITeughelsW. Novel natural product-based oral topical rinses and toothpastes to prevent periodontal diseases. Periodontol. (2000) 84:102–23. 10.1111/prd.12339
10.
QiuJWangJLuoHDuXLiHLuoMet al. The effects of subinhibitory concentrations of costus oil on virulence factor production in Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Microbiol. (2011) 110:333–40. 10.1111/j.1365-2010.04888.x
11.
GrazianoTSCalilCMSartorattoAFrancoGCGroppoFCCogo-MüllerK. In vitro effects of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil on growth and production of volatile Sulphur compounds by oral bacteria. J Appl Oral Sci. (2016) 24:582–9. 10.1590/1678-775720160044
12.
ByambaragchaaMde la CruzJYangSHHwangSG. Anti-metastatic potential of ethanol extract of saussurea involucrata against hepatic cancer in vitro. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. (2013) 14:5397–402. 10.7314/APJCP.14.9.5397
13.
ShatiAAAlkahtaniMAAlfaifiMYElbehairiSEIElsaidFGPrasannaRet al. Secondary metabolites of Saussurea costus leaf extract induce apoptosis in breast, liver, and colon cancer cells by caspase-3-dependent intrinsic pathway. Biomed Res Int. (2020) 2020:1–11. 10.1155/2020/1608942
14.
MujammamiM. Clinical significance of Saussurea costus in thyroid treatment. Saudi Med J. (2020) 41:1047–53. 10.15537/smj.10.25416
15.
LamNSLongXSuXZLuF. Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil and its monoterpene constituents in treating protozoan and helminthic infections. Biomed Pharmacother. (2020) 130:110624. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110624
16.
LabibRMAyoubIMMichelHEMehannyMKamilVHanyMet al. Appraisal on the wound healing potential of Melaleuca alternifolia and Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oil-loaded chitosan topical preparations. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:e0219561. 10.1371/journal.pone.0219561
17.
OlivaACostantiniSDe AngelisMGarzoliSBožoviMMascellinoMTet al. High potency of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil against multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules. (2018) 23:2584. 10.3390/molecules23102584
18.
TullioVRoanaJScalasDMandrasN. Enhanced killing of Candida krusei by Polymorphonuclear leucocytes in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of Melaleuca alternifolia and “Mentha of Pancalieri” essential oils. Molecules. (2019) 24:3824 10.3390/molecules24213824
19.
GhazalTSLevySMChildersNKCarterKDCaplanDJWarrenJJet al. Mutans streptococci and dental caries: a new statistical modeling approach. Caries Res. (2018) 52:246–52. 10.1159/000486103
20.
JavedFTenenbaumHCNogueira-FilhoGNoohNTaiyeb AliTBSamaranayakeLPet al. Oral Candida carriage and species prevalence amongst habitual gutka-chewers and non-chewers. Int Wound J. (2014) 11:79–84. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01070.x
21.
BartoldPMVan DykeTE. An appraisal of the role of specific bacteria in the initial pathogenesis of periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. (2019) 46:6–11. 10.1111/jcpe.13046
22.
BelibasakisGNCharalampakisGBostanciNStadlingerB. Peri-implant infections of oral biofilm etiology. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2015) 830:69–84. 10.1007/978-3-319-11038-7_4
23.
NaqviSZKiranUAliMIJamalAHameedAAhmedSet al. Combined efficacy of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles and different antibiotics against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Int J Nanomedicine. (2013) 8:3187–95. 10.2147/IJN.S49284
24.
ArendsSJRCaninoMAMendesRScangarella-OmanNEFlammRK. Comparison of minimum inhibitory concentration results for gepotidacin obtained using agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. (2020) 98:115107. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115107
25.
AabedKMoubayedNBinShabaibMSSSAL. Is a single session of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjuvant to non-surgical scaling and root planing effective in reducing periodontal inflammation and subgingival presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in patients with periodontitis?Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. (2022) 38:102847. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102847
26.
BinshabaibMAabedKAlotaibiFAlwaqidMAlfraidyA. Alharthi S. Antimicrobial efficacy of 08% hyaluronic acid and 02% chlorhexidine against Porphyromonas gingivalis strains: an in-vitro study. Pak J Med Sci. (2020) 36:111–4. 10.12669/pjms.36.2.1456
27.
SSALBinShabaibMSaad AlMasoudNShawkyHAAabedKFAlomarTSet al. Melaibari, myrrh mixed with silver nanoparticles demonstrates superior antimicrobial activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis compared to myrrh and silver nanoparticles alone. Saudi Dent J. (2021) 33:890–6. 10.1016/j.sdentj.09.009
28.
PembertonMNGibsonJ. Chlorhexidine and hypersensitivity reactions in dentistry. Br Dent J. (2012) 213:547–50. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.1086
29.
KotsailidiEAKalogirouEMMichelogiannakisDVlachodimitropoulosDTosiosKI. Hypersensitivity reaction of the gingiva to chlorhexidine: case report and literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. (2020) 130:156–60. 10.1016/j.oooo.04.814
30.
Al-ZawawiASShaheenMYDivakarDDAldulaijanHABasudanAM. Postoperative anti-inflammatory efficacy of 2% saline rinses and a herbal—mouthwash after non-surgical periodontal therapy for the management of periodontal inflammation in young adults with chlorhexidine allergy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Dent Hyg. (2022) 20:408–14. 10.1111/idh.12583
31.
Golpasand HaghLZakaviFAnsarifarSGhasemzadehOSolgiG. Association of dental caries and salivary sIgA with tobacco smoking. Aust Dent J. (2013) 58:219–23. 10.1111/adj.12059
32.
BinShabaibMSSALAkramZKhanJRahmanIRomanosGEet al. Clinical periodontal status and gingival crevicular fluid cytokine profile among cigarette-smokers, electronic-cigarette users and never-smokers. Arch Oral Biol. (2019) 102:212–7. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.05.001
33.
JavedFAl-KheraifAASalazar-LazoKYanez-FontenlaVAldosaryKMAlshehriMet al. Periodontal inflammatory conditions among smokers and never-smokers with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Periodontol. (2015) 86:839–46. 10.1902/jop.2015.150120
34.
JavedFAl-ZawawiASAllemailemKSAlmatroudiAMehmoodADivakarDD. Periodontal conditions and whole salivary IL-17A and−23 levels among young adult cannabis sativa (Marijuana)-smokers, heavy cigarette-smokers and non-smokers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:7435. 10.3390/ijerph17207435
35.
JavedFBashir AhmedHRomanosGE. Association between environmental tobacco smoke and periodontal disease: a systematic review. Environ Res. (2014) 133:117–22. 10.1016/j.envres.05.008
36.
KotsakisGAJavedFHinrichsJEKaroussisIKRomanosGE. Impact of cigarette smoking on clinical outcomes of periodontal flap surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. (2015) 86:254–63. 10.1902/jop.2014.140452
37.
GencoRJBorgnakkeWS. Diabetes as a potential risk for periodontitis: association studies. Periodontol. (2000) 83:40–5. 10.1111/prd.12270
38.
GravesDTDingZYangY. The impact of diabetes on periodontal diseases. Periodontol. (2000) 82:214–24. 10.1111/prd.12318
39.
NajiAEdmanKHolmlundA. Influence of smoking on periodontal healing one year after active treatment. J Clin Periodontol. (2020) 47:343–50. 10.1111/jcpe.13228
40.
WadeWG. The oral microbiome in health and disease. Pharmacol Res. (2013) 69:137–43. 10.1016/j.phrs.11.006
41.
PolakDShapiraL. An update on the evidence for pathogenic mechanisms that may link periodontitis and diabetes. J Clin Periodontol. (2018) 45:150–66. 10.1111/jcpe.12803
Summary
Keywords
Saussurea costus, Melaleuca alternifolia, tea tree oil, essential oil, antibacterial
Citation
BinShabaib MS, ALHarthi SS, Helaby BS, AlHefdhi MH, Mohammed AE and Aabed K (2022) Comparison of the Anti-bacterial Efficacy of Saussurea costus and Melaleuca alternifolia Against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococcus mutans, and Enterococcus faecalis: An in-vitro Study. Front. Oral. Health 3:950840. doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.950840
Received
23 May 2022
Accepted
06 June 2022
Published
27 June 2022
Volume
3 - 2022
Edited by
Fahim Vohra, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
Reviewed by
Imran Farooq, University of Toronto, Canada; Fawad Javed, University of Rochester, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 BinShabaib, ALHarthi, Helaby, AlHefdhi, Mohammed and Aabed.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shatha S. ALHarthi alharthy.s@hotmail.com; SHSALHarthi@pnu.edu.sa
This article was submitted to Oral Health Promotion, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oral Health
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.