In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 7 as published. The results shown in the graph for the cement industry scenario do not represent the actual results, which were discussed in the paper. The corrected Figure 7 appears below.
Figure 7
SNG generation costs for different plant capacities and years of implementation. (A) steel industry scenario, (B) cement industry scenario.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
co-electrolysis, methanation, power-to-gas, techno-economy, oxygen utilization, CCU, cement industry, steel industry
Citation
Böhm H, Lehner M and Kienberger T (2022) Corrigendum: Techno-Economic Assessment of Thermally Integrated Co-Electrolysis and Methanation for Industrial Closed Carbon Cycles. Front. Sustain. 3:862853. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2022.862853
Received
26 January 2022
Accepted
28 February 2022
Published
22 March 2022
Volume
3 - 2022
Edited and reviewed by
Stefano Stendardo, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Böhm, Lehner and Kienberger.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hans Böhm boehm@energieinstitut-linz.at
This article was submitted to Circular Economy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sustainability
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.