Abstract
A majority of agricultural activities are conducted under fragile lands or set-up. The growth and development of crops are negatively affected due to several biotic and abiotic stresses. In the current situation, research efforts have been diverted toward the short-term approaches that can improve crop performance under changing environments. Seed treatment or priming technology is in a transition phase of its popularity among resource-poor farmers. Suitable policy intervention can boost low-cost techniques to implement them on a larger scale in developing countries and to harness the maximum benefits of sustainable food production systems. Primed seeds have high vigor and germination rate that help in seedling growth and successful crop stand establishment under stress conditions. This review is attempted to assess different seed priming techniques in terms of resource use efficiency, crop productivity, cost–benefit balance, and environmental impacts. Moreover, a comprehensive study of the mechanisms (physiological and biochemical) of seed priming is also elaborated. A detailed examination of the applications of priming technology under diverse agroecosystems can improve our understanding of the adaptive management of natural resources.
Introduction
Nearly 60% of the Indian population relies upon agriculture and its associated sectors for their livelihood. Enormous improvement in food grain production was achieved through the Green Revolution with the adoption of modern approaches such as high-yielding varieties, agrochemicals and intensified farming (Akhilesh and Kavitha, 2020). Although high-yielding varieties are being promoted, the bulk of the tropical land fails to provide suitable growth conditions for these high-yielding crops; and consequently, low yield is obtained even after the application of necessary agrochemicals. Indiscriminate use of these chemicals causes environmental pollution, soil degradation and economical burden to farmers. Different factors such as rapid growth in population rate, cultivating lands that are ill-suited for agriculture, inappropriate farming practices and eradication of trees for fuel and shelter can render tropical soils to be fragile. Further, the regional agricultural hubs under tropical conditions are highly affected by extreme events of climate change, e.g., heavy rainfall, floods and droughts (González-Orozco et al., 2020; Sarkar et al., 2020a).
Dealing with fragile ecosystems is challenging for agricultural researchers to provide restorative solutions. In this context, to curtail the effects of climate change and continue cultivation practices under fragile ecosystems, the adoption of eco-friendly and economical techniques such as seed priming, low-input sustainable agriculture, conservation agriculture, etc., are imperative (Rakshit and Singh, 2018; Sarkar et al., 2020a). Pre-sowing techniques like seed priming grabbed the attention of researchers and grew into the subject of extensive investigation and interest when it addressed the problems of slow and non-uniform germination, low seed vigor, poor crop stand, biotic and abiotic stresses, poor product quality, etc. (Paparella et al., 2015; Chatterjee et al., 2018; Zulfiqar, 2021). Seed priming eases germination even under adverse conditions, lifts crop performance and enhances yield potential (Ajouri et al., 2004; Ibrahim, 2016; Marthandan et al., 2020). To alleviate the effects of modern agriculture, this technique emerged as a viable strategy that protects plants against both biotic and abiotic stresses (Sarkar et al., 2018). The absolute performance of seed priming is more prominent under adverse conditions (Parera and Cantliffe, 1994) such as fragile ecosystems than favorable conditions.
Fragile Ecosystems
Fragile lands comprise tropics, semi-arid areas, deserts, wetlands, islands, coastal regions and mountains (ENVIS Resource Partner on Biodiversity, 2020). It is projected that over 33% of land resources in the world are degraded owing to intensive agricultural practices, deforestation, desertification, salinization, pollution, industrialization, urbanization, unscientific land-use practices, climate change, etc. (Abhilash, 2021). Globally, drylands are distributed around 6.45 billion hectares, and 70% of these lands are used for cultivation purposes (Karim and Rahman, 2015). Peculiar characteristics of desert soils are drought and aridity circumstances where crop experiences water-deficit conditions. In desert farming, crop strives with water-scarce situations as a result of inadequate rainfall, and rapid land surface evaporation leads to crop failure or reduction in yield. Annual rainfall in semi-arid regions falls in between desert ecosystem and potential evapotranspiration. The major hazards in semi-arid regions are low rainfall, soil erosion and salinity that lead to low soil organic carbon content, available nitrogen and poor soil structure (Garcia-Franco et al., 2018). According to Chivasa et al. (2001), the poor stand establishment of tropical crops in semi-arid regions of Zimbabwe is primarily due to low-quality seeds, poor sowing techniques and low soil moisture. Salinity has affected above 800 million hectares of the global area (Gopalakrishnan and Kumar, 2020). The expansion rate of soil salinization indicates that more than 50% of global arable land will be affected by 2050 (Tisarum et al., 2020). The germination percentage, as well as germination time, decreases with an increase in salt concentration (Ibrahim, 2016).
In India, mountains are sustaining 6% of the population and 18% of the geographical area (Wani, 2011) where the potential of agriculture is extensive. The major constraint in hilly lands is undulating topography, which causes soil erosion and a reduction in soil fertility. Further, low temperature or chilling stress generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which hampers seed germination (Farooq et al., 2017). Wetlands contribute 4.7% of India's geographical area (Bassi et al., 2014), which are saturated with water throughout the year or differing durations. The main limitations in wetland agriculture are excessive flood and drought damage and nutrient run-off. In small islands, the challenge is to meet people's demands with limited resources. Similar to other categories of fragile lands, small island soils too struggle with complications such as irregular topography, ecosystem instability, soil erosion and loss of fertility. Coastal areas occupy more than 10% of land on the Earth's surface (Ministry of Environment Forest, 2012). Agriculture in coastal areas faces considerable threats such as seawater inundation, soil salinity, and erosion.
Integration of Resources is Key
Fragile ecosystems are extremely vulnerable to climate change that induces adverse effects on crop production and food security. For example, diffusion and mass flow of nutrients (especially water-soluble ones) decrease due to drought stress (Vurukonda et al., 2016). To meet the nutrient demand of crops and for the finest yields, chemical fertilizers play a key role. Despite several advantages, chemical fertilizers and pesticides are unfriendly to the environment, causing damage to soil, plant, animal, and human health and also placing an economic burden on farmers. Indiscriminate application of synthetic fertilizers interrupts sustainability and environmental quality, while the reduction of organic matter application causes adverse impacts on soil health (Sarkar et al., 2017a; Ferdous et al., 2020). Loss of soil fertility is accompanied by decreased soil aggregation, water-holding capacity (WHC), biodiversity and crop stress tolerance (Sergaki et al., 2018). To minimize these impaired effects of climate change and agrochemicals on soils, agriculture and environment, switching to the integration of fertilizers and naturally available resources that sustain environment and restore nutrients naturally through supporting internal cycling and assuring harmony of ecosystem is an appropriate practice to restore the quality of degraded systems (Singh and Reddy, 2011; Dubey et al., 2021a,b). These are basically practiced with a customized approach. Integration of agrochemicals with organic or natural resources such as farmyard manure (FYM), compost and bio-fertilizers replaces some quantity of fertilizers, supplements a part of energy, improves soil properties and maintains sustainability (Figure 1). In a 5-years field experiment on wheat, integrating 50 and 75% of recommended dose of NPK fertilizers with FYM and bio-fertilizer enhanced grain yield significantly in all seasons and also reduced the quantity of chemical fertilizer requirement (Cisse et al., 2019). Further, integration of manure and bio-agent with 50% recommended dose of fertilizers greatly enhanced yield in the long run. Single and combined application of organics, viz. press mud, FYM and vermicompost, in bread wheat revealed the improvement in grain yield by 30–68%, and the highest B:C ratio was recorded in FYM treatments (Ali et al., 2020).
Figure 1
Seed Priming—A Viable Answer
Modern agricultural practices with an intensive approach (e.g., heavy tillage, synthetic agrochemicals, hybrid varieties, and monocropping) may further deteriorate fragile lands by accelerating the loss of organic matter, degradation of soil and environmental damage (e.g., deterioration of water and air quality, loss of biodiversity, and biomagnification); thus, several attempts have been carried out to achieve ecosystem stability. Vital aspects of crop improvement through maintaining sustainability can be accomplished by modulating the metabolism of seed that would be achieved by seed priming technique. Seed priming is a pre-sowing seed treatment that allows controlled hydration of seeds to imbibe water and go through the first stage of germination but does not allow radical protrusion through the seed coat (McDonald, 2000).
Seed priming hastens the germination process and enhances the rate of seedling emergence even under extreme climatic conditions and in problem soils. Seed priming is categorized into different types, viz. hydropriming, osmopriming, halopriming, hormonal priming, and biopriming, and provides extensive crop benefits. Seed priming techniques can deal with detrimental conditions in fragile lands such as drought, heat stress, salinity, nutrient stress and several environmental stresses. Seed soaking in distilled water and osmotic solutions is considered hydropriming and osmopriming, respectively. Hydropriming in paddy crop enhanced resistance against CO2 stress and oxidative damage (Nedunchezhiyan et al., 2020), while osmopriming with CaCl2 in wheat provided resistance against drought stress (Hussain et al., 2018). Seed imbibition using phytohormones to activate seed metabolism is known as hormonal priming. Seed priming with cytokinins (plant growth substance) imparted salt stress in wheat (Iqbal et al., 2006) and drought tolerance in soybean (Mangena, 2020). Beneficial microorganisms or plant growth-promoting microorganisms used for seed treatment are crucial for biopriming. Groundnut seeds treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens mitigated salt stress under field conditions (Saravanakumar and Samiyappan, 2007). Enhanced plant stress tolerance against drought was also recorded due to bacterial priming (Bacillus thuringiensis) of wheat seeds (Timmusk et al., 2014). Chemical priming is another type of priming where seed treatment is carried using natural substances (organic acids, plant extracts, chitosan, polyamines, mannose, trehalose, etc.) or synthetic compounds (sodium nitroprusside, sodium hypochlorite, etc.) (Jisha et al., 2013; Paparella et al., 2015; Lutts et al., 2016). However, combined application of natural and synthetic substances is also a common practice in seed priming. For example, Bajwa et al. (2018) found that priming wheat seeds with sorghum extracts and benzyl aminopurine improved crop performance under saline soil conditions. Choosing an appropriate priming approach in accordance with the limitations of a fragile land would be pertinent to combat stress.
Mechanisms of Seed Priming
Priming exposes seed to stimuli, in response to which a set of interlinked biochemical changes occurs such as activation of enzymes, synthesis of growth-promoting substances, metabolism of germination inhibitors and repair of cell damage (Farooq et al., 2010; Chatterjee et al., 2018). The process of seed priming is accomplished in three stages (Ibrahim, 2016; Lutts et al., 2016; Marthandan et al., 2020). Seed imbibition is the first (I) stage, where the seed uptakes water rapidly as the water potential of the seed is low. Stage II is known as the activation phase. This stage is characterized by a series of metabolic and repairing events at the cellular level (Figure 2). The moisture content decreases, and the major changes documented during this stage include synthesis of protein, formation of new mitochondria, activation of enzymes and antioxidant system, and DNA repair. Seed imbibition is stopped after this stage. Rehydration during seed priming induce changes at the cellular level such as cell division, synthesis of nucleic acids, protein, ATP production, increase in cell energy, ATP/ADP ratio for energy requirement, accumulation of essential lipids, production of antioxidants and activation of DNA repair mechanism (Varier et al., 2010; Paparella et al., 2015; Lutts et al., 2016). In the cell damage repair system, DNA repair is most crucial because, in case of defective repair, oxidative injury can lead to cell death during germination (Paparella et al., 2015). Studies revealed that proteins, carbohydrates and lipid-mobilizing enzymes are activated during seed priming (Varier et al., 2010; Di Girolamo and Barbanti, 2012; Hameed et al., 2013). For example, α-amylase activity along with total soluble sugars increased in wheat when primed with benzyl aminopurine and sorghum water extract (Bajwa et al., 2018). α-Amylase is known to hydrolyse the starch (polysaccharides) reserves into sugars (simple forms). Priming enhances protein synthesis by increasing the synthesis of rRNA and improving the integrity of ribosomes. Production of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) and maintaining a balance between generation and destruction of ROS such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide and hydroxyl radicals under stress conditions are important effects of seed priming (Wojtyla et al., 2016; Farooq et al., 2017). In stage III, the uptake of water is rapid, and protrusion of the radicle indicates that the germination process has entered into the growth and cell elongation phase (Marthandan et al., 2020). Metabolic changes of seeds induced by priming are detailed with some research findings in Table 1.
Figure 2
Table 1
| Crop | Priming type (priming agent, concentration, and soaking time) | Changes at physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice | Biopriming (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Serratia marcescens; 1 × 107 CFU ml−1; 12 h) | Enhanced activities of peroxidase (APX) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in rice seedlings | Reduced rice blast (disease) severity caused by Magnaporthe oryzae (fungus) | Amruta et al., 2019 |
| Chemical priming (spermidine + trehalose; 1 mM; 24 h) | (i) Increased proline and soluble sugar contents in leaves(ii) Reduced malondialdehyde (indicator of oxidative damage level) content in rice seedlings(iii) Improved CAT, POD, and APX activities in rice seedlings(iv) Expressions of polyamines biosynthesis-related genes and trehalose-6-phosphate–phosphatase genes | Increased chilling tolerance resulting in better seed vigor and seedling growth | Fu et al., 2020 | |
| Wheat | Chemical priming (sodium nitroprusside; 0.1 mM; 12 h) | (i) Increased activities of leaf superoxidase dismutase (SOD), POD, and CAT(ii) Increased contents of leaf proline, ascorbic acid and total phenolics(iii) Decreased leaf malondialdehyde content | Enhanced salt tolerance | Ali et al., 2017 |
| Osmopriming (aerated CaCl2; 1.5%; 12 h) | (i) Increased leaf area and tissue water contents(ii) Enhanced accumulation of osmolytes (proline and glycine betaine)(iii) Reduced lipid peroxidation(iv) Activation of transcription factors associated with antioxidant enzymes | Increased crop performance under drought stress | Tabassum et al., 2018 | |
| Chemical priming (sorghum water extract; 5% v/v; benzyl aminopurine; 5 mg L−1; 12 h) | (i) Increased chlorophyll (a and b) and total chlorophyll contents(ii) Improved accumulation of total soluble sugars and total soluble proteins in leaves(iii) Increased α-amylase activity in leaves(iv) Reduced Na+ content and enhanced K+ content in leaves(v) Increased total phenolic level in leaves | Improved salt tolerance | Bajwa et al., 2018 | |
| Barley | Nutrient priming (ZnSO4; 10 mM of Zn; KH2PO4; 50 mM of P; 12 h) | Improved root growth and root biomass | Improved P and Zn uptake and water use efficiency under nutrient (P and Zn)-deficient and drought conditions | Ajouri et al., 2004 |
| Pearl millet | Biopriming (Pseudomonas fluorescens; 1 × 108 CFU ml−1; 6 h) | (i) Increased leaf surface area(ii) Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance(iii) Production of plant growth-promoting hormones, antimicrobial and antioxidative substances, etc. | Reduced downy mildew (disease) severity caused by Sclerospora graminicola (fungus) | Raj et al., 2004 |
| Chickpea | Osmopriming (CaCl2; 18 h) | (i) Increased specific leaf area, CO2 net assimilation rate and relative water content(ii) Improved accumulation of leaf total soluble phenolics, free proline and ascorbic acid(iii) Increased activities of CAT, SOD, and APX(iv) Increased α-amylase activity and trehalose content in germinating seeds | Enhanced chilling tolerance | Farooq et al., 2017 |
| Rapeseed | Biopriming (hypovirulent Sclerotinia sclerotiorum strain DT-8 carrying a DNA virus SsHADV-1; 10 ml 5 g seed−1; 18 h) | (i) Induced systemic resistance(ii) Influence on composition and structure of plant microbiome(iii) Secretion of oxalic acid | Reduced stem rot (disease) severity caused by S. sclerotiorum (fungus) | Qu et al., 2020 |
| Cotton | Hydropriming (water; 2 h) | (i) Increased activities of CAT, SOD, POD, ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR)(ii) Decreased lipid peroxidation | Improved germination per cent and reduced deterioration of seeds under accelerated aging | Goel et al., 2003 |
| Tobacco | Chemical priming (putrescine; 0.1 mM; 48 h) | (i) Increased activities of SOD, CAT, POD, and APX in tobacco seedlings(ii) Decrease in the level of malondialdehyde | Enhanced chilling tolerance | Xu et al., 2011 |
Mechanisms of seed priming involved in improved stress tolerance in crops.
Practices and Performances of Seed Priming
The objectives of seed priming related to improved crop performance are achieved by different methods as described in the earlier section. Each priming technique involves restricted hydration to allow imbibition and pre-germinative metabolic changes (Figure 2). The efficiency of priming is affected by numerous factors and straightaway depends on treated crop species, particular cultivar and selected priming method. Physical, chemical and biological factors such as nature of solute and water content, primers, time, temperature, existence or non-existence of luminosity, aeration and seed condition also control priming success and decide germination rate and time, seedling vigor and finally plant growth and development. In hydropriming, the soaking of seeds in water for a specific period of time before sowing is ensured, which will finally be dried to a certain moisture content (Singh et al., 2015) and is an effortless, economical and environment-friendly technique. It is a potent approach to combat abiotic stresses such as heat and drought stress to crop. Different chemical solutions are also used as priming agents. Soaking of seeds in the solution with inorganic salts, viz. NaCl, KNO3, CaCl2, and CaSO4, is known as halopriming (Nawaz et al., 2013). Halopriming stimulates the crop to raise robust even under soil salinity. This is a common observation in hydropriming that due to the high water potential of pure water entry to seed is very fast, which allows abrupt seed imbibition, which may not be congenial for germination metabolic activation and cell elongation under diverse agro-ecologies. To overcome this hurdle, seeds are soaked in an osmotic solution such as sugar, polyethylene glycol (PEG), glycerol, sorbitol and mannitol, followed by air drying. Osmosis controls the excess water entry into the seed during imbibition, hence reducing the ROS accumulation and thus protecting the cell from oxidative injury. Osmopriming improves crop performance in both saline and non-saline conditions. Because of its direct impact on seed metabolism, plant growth regulators in minuscule quantities are also used in pre-sowing seed treatment with different organic compounds, viz. IAA, salicylic acid, ascorbate and kinetin (Nawaz et al., 2013), and not only promotes growth and development but also alleviates the impacts of several environmental stresses. In diverse stressed agro-ecologies, it is a common practice where seeds are soaked in a nutrient solution with certain concentration for a specific time period before being sowed with a resultant positive effect on growth, yield and nutrient uptake (Shivay et al., 2016). Researchers have documented that seed priming with macro- or micronutrients can increase water uptake efficiency, enhance nutrient substances and hasten the seed germination rate and seedling development (Bhowmick et al., 2013; Rakshit et al., 2013, 2014).
The application of beneficial microorganisms (Trichoderma harzianum, Azospirillum lipoferum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Rhizobium spp., Bacillus spp., etc.) improves soil properties, enhances plant growth and increases the activity of symbiotic microbes (Javaid, 2010; Sarkar et al., 2017b). Further, they improve plant performance by releasing plant growth hormones, mobilizing nutrients and suppressing pests and diseases. Among all methods of microbial applications, the advanced method is seed biopriming. It is the seed pre-soaking (seed hydration) along with inoculation of beneficial microorganisms. Biopriming promotes microbial colonization at the root zone of the plant and thus enhances plant growth (Raj et al., 2004; Sarkar et al., 2020b).
The capability of seed priming to enhance nutrient use efficiency can be an answer for limited mineral reserves of essential nutrients as it is being depleted day by day. Under the current agricultural scenario, ~50% of applied fertilizers are indeed utilized by crop (Parihar et al., 2019), and the rest is subjected to losses through leaching, soil fixation, low mobility, denitrification, etc., posing threat to the environment and economy, which could be minimized by seed priming that enhances uptake nutrients and minimize losses (Sarkar et al., 2021). Biopriming of wheat seed with T. harzianum improved nitrogen use efficiency (agronomic) up to 3.36% when applied with 1/4th N and recommended dose of PK (Meena et al., 2016). Nutrient priming of barley seed with P and Zn individually or in combination enhanced the nutrient uptake and water use efficiency under nutrient (P and Zn)-deficient and drought conditions (Ajouri et al., 2004). In a P-deficient tropical soil, priming of mung bean seeds with 0.01 and 0.02% P enhanced the P uptake (Shah et al., 2012). Kumar et al. (2020) reported maximum P solubilizing activity in a consortium of Burkholderia gladioli, Pseudomonas sp., and Bacillus subtilis, and the application of this consortium through seed biopriming improved the soil available P by 54%.
Seeds priming improves water use efficiency and, hence, suitable in drought-prone areas as well. Seed priming is one of the lifelong practices with new age interventions that proved to be an efficient technology for plants under water stress conditions. Under mild-to-severe drought conditions, priming of sesame seeds with different species of mycorrhizal fungi (Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizoglomus intraradices) enhanced water use efficiency by 6% to 10% by improving root length and overall root system (Askari et al., 2019). Priming of rice seed with moringa leaf extract increased the water productivity to the highest level (compared with CaCl2 and KCl) when managed under alternate wetting and drying conditions (Rehman et al., 2015). Osmopriming with different molecules (gibberellic acid and ammonium molybdate) improved water use efficiency in summer cowpea seeds sown under limited water availability conditions (Arun et al., 2017).
The economical profit of a crop via any technology can be determined through a benefit–cost (B:C) ratio analysis that can be described as an evaluation of expenditure through comparing economic benefit with the economic cost of an activity (Shively and Galopin, 2013). Seed priming techniques reduce chemical input requirements of the crop by increasing efficiency (Rakshit et al., 2014), which helps in enhancing the B:C ratio. In a 3-years experiment on wheat, the economic returns and B:C ratio were higher in osmopriming compared with hydropriming (Farooq et al., 2020). Enhancement in economic yield per cent by 4–39% was reviewed in wheat, rice, maize, and linola crops through the adoption of different seed priming techniques (Farooq et al., 2019). The seed biopriming technique regulates defense systems of crops to overcome climatic conditions under varied agro-ecologies and showed a higher B:C ratio than that of the recommended dose of fertilizer (Devika and Rakshit, 2019). While comparing the effects of hydropriming, chemical priming and hormonal priming on developing salt tolerance in Indian mustard, Srivastava et al. (2010) concluded that hydropriming is a simple and cost-effective approach to achieve the target.
Seed priming is an economical and trending technique that can resist environmental stresses as well as biotic stresses (pests and pathogens). The benefits of seed priming with the help of research evidence are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
| S. no. | Crop | Priming agent and temperature | Priming duration | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mung bean | Distilled water | 6 h | At chilling stress conditions, i.e., 5°C, primed seeds showed significantly higher germination and seedling growth as compared with the control | Posmyk and Janas, 2007 |
| 2 | Pyrethrum | Distilled water at 25°C | 24 h | Hydropriming reduced the mean germination time, enhanced germination percentage and improved the resistance against salt stress conditions | Li et al., 2011 |
| 3 | Sunflower | Water at 25°C | 18 h | Hydropriming of seeds showed significantly higher mean germination (92%), speed of emergence, vigor index, seed dehydrogenase activity, seedling total DNA content and seedling dry weight (21 mg) as compared with control | Shanthala and Siddaraju, 2013 |
| 4 | Faba bean | Water at 22–24°C | 8 h | Improved mean germination time (5.81 days) and higher seed yield by 12.0% | Damalas et al., 2019 |
| 5 | Wheat | CaSO4 (50 mM) at 25°C | 12 h | Priming with CaSO4 enhanced germination percentage, root length, and fresh and dry weight of seedlings under both saline and non-saline conditions as compared with control. Maximum potassium concentration, total sugars and reducing sugars in seedlings were also found | Afzal et al., 2008 |
| 6 | Sunflower | KNO3 (−1.0 MPa) at 30°C | 24 h | The results showed that in primed treatments, germination percentage, radical length, seedling height, dry weight, no. of leaves per plant, and sodium and potassium contents in plants were significantly found high as compared with those in control even under saline stress conditions | Bajehbaj, 2010 |
| 7 | Tomato | KNO3 (25 mM) at 25°C | 24 h | Halopriming with KNO3 enhanced germination index, final germination percentage, root length, shoot length and seedling fresh weight as compared with other treatments and control | Nawaz et al., 2011 |
| 8 | Sesame | CaCl2 (2%) at 27°C ± 3°C | 6 h | In primed seeds, final emergence per cent, root length, shoot length, seedling fresh weight, dry weight and vigor index were significantly higher than that those of control | Shabbir et al., 2014 |
| 9 | Spinach | PEG (−0.6 MPa) at 15°C | 8 days | Osmopriming enhanced seed germination potential and stress tolerance in germinating seeds by increasing the strength of antioxidant system | Chen and Arora, 2011 |
| 10 | Soybean | PEG (−1.2 MPa) at 25°C | 12 h | Significant impact on germination index, germination percentage and seed vigor | Sadeghi et al., 2011 |
| 11 | Alfalfa | PEG (−0.6 MPa) at 25°C | 24 h | Results of the experiment revealed that seed osmopriming enhanced growth, leaf area and nodulation under drought conditions. Physiologically enhancement in PS-II efficiency, relative water content, stomatal closure, N2 fixation, and P and K uptake were also observed | Mouradi et al., 2016 |
| 12 | Wheat | Ascorbic acid (50 ppm) + salicylic acid (50 ppm) | 12 h | Seeds primed with salicylic acid and ascorbic acid resulted in germination percentage and reduced the time of germination in both saline and non-saline conditions as compared with remaining treatments. It also significantly improved the shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight of shoots | Afzal et al., 2006 |
| 13 | Rice | Salicylic acid (20 ppm) | 48 h | Results revealed the enhancement in vigor, uniform germination, mean germination time, radical and plumule length, seedling fresh and dry weights as compared with control | Basra et al., 2006 |
| 14 | Hot pepper | Salicylic acid (0.8 mM) Acetylsalicylic acid (0.2 mM) | 48 h | Under saline conditions, both the priming treatments gave significantly better results as compared with control by enhancing seedling vigor, emergence percentage, root and shoot length, seedling fresh weight and dry weight | Khan et al., 2009 |
| 15 | Wheat | Ascorbic acid (20 ppm) | 48 h | In primed treatments, maximum germination and emergence percentage, root length, shoot length and dry weight were noticed as compared with control | Khan et al., 2011 |
| 16 | Wheat | 10−4 M of gibberellic acid, salicylic acid | 8 h | Both hormonal priming treatments significantly enhanced yield in all genotypes under normal conditions as well as drought-stressed conditions. Salicylic acid priming greatly enhanced the stress tolerance index in crops | Ulfat et al., 2017 |
| 17 | Barley | 50 mM of P + 10 mM of Zn | 12 h | Results of the experiment revealed that nutrient priming with Zn and P under the deficiency of these nutrients significantly improved uptake of both P and Zn by plants along with the improved performance of growth parameters | Ajouri et al., 2004 |
| 18 | Barley | Zn (10 mM) + P (100 mM) | 12 h | The growth parameters such as germination percentage, seedling emergence, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and seedling dry weight were found significantly superior as compared with remaining treatments | Abdulrahmani et al., 2007 |
| 19 | Maize | Fe (8.5 mM) Zn (4 mM) + Mn (2.5 mM) | 24 h | Among the treatments, nutrient-primed treatments showed significantly superior results such as seedling growth, root length, and Zn, Mn, Fe, and P concentrations in shoots and yield | Imran et al., 2013 |
| 20 | Maize | Zn (4 mM) + Mn (2.5 mM) B (5 mM) P (0.2 M) | 24 h | Under controlled conditions, primed nutrient contents in seed were significantly improved than those of control. Nutrient priming with mentioned nutrients significantly increased growth of plants when the nutrient solution was deficient in that particular nutrient | Muhammad et al., 2015 |
| 21 | Bread wheat | 0.5 M of ZnSO4 | 12 h | Nutrient priming with zinc under zinc-deficient soil conditions enhanced final yield by 27.1%, which was maximum improvement as compared with the rest of the treatments imposed | Rehman et al., 2018 |
| 22 | Rice | Trichoderma harzianum | 24 h | Biopriming reduced the deteriorating effect of salinity and significantly increased proline, phenol content and membrane stability as compared with non-primed seeds. It also significantly enhanced the number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content | Rawat et al., 2012 |
| 23 | Chickpea | T. harzianum | 12 h | The results revealed that biopriming with Trichoderma suppressed Fusarium wilt by 53.38–57.99% suppression and also increased the germination and plant growth parameters as compared with those of chemical fungicides and control | Kumar et al., 2014 |
| 24 | Pea | Trichoderma asperellum | 24 h | In bioprimed treatments, increase in shoot length, root length, no. of leaves, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight and root dry weight by 35.29, 96.49, 28.13, 36.10, 146.26, 30.17, and 77.2%, respectively, was recorded | Singh M. et al., 2016; Singh V. et al., 2016 |
| 25 | Maize | Azospirillum brasilense | 12 h | Biopriming with Azospirillum resulted in significantly higher field emergence (96.3%), crop growth, performance and yield than those of control | Madhukeshwara and Sajjan, 2017 |
| 26 | Wheat | T. harzianum | 30 min | Biopriming significantly enhanced effective tillers by 59–153%, chlorophyll content by 174–189% and root length by 27% than those of control | Meena et al., 2016 |
Role of priming in improving plant performance.
Conclusions
Seed priming is a viable option to boost the performance of crops under fragile ecosystems. An enhanced understanding of the metabolic events taking place throughout the priming intervention and the subsequent germination should facilitate to use this simple and inexpensive technology for maximizing seed performance in a more resourceful way under varied fragile ecologies. However, many popular technologies failed to reach the farmers' field due to a lack of awareness. Suitable policy intervention to strengthen the extension services moves the targets to the next level. It is desirable to highlight the advantages of seed priming in terms of ecosystem restoration and harness sustainable biomass production from degraded lands.
Statements
Author contributions
OSD, SS, PB, and JS: writing. AR: writing, editing, and supervision. DS: writing and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbdulrahmaniB.Ghassemi-GolezaniK.ValizadehM.AslV. F. (2007). Seed priming and seedling establishment of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. Food Agricult. Environ.5:179.
2
AbhilashP. C. (2021). Restoring the unrestored: strategies for restoring global land during the UN decade on ecosystem restoration (UN-DER). Land10:201. 10.3390/land10020201
3
AfzalI.BasraS. M.FarooqM.NawazA. (2006). Alleviation of salinity stress in spring wheat by hormonal priming with ABA, salicylic acid and ascorbic acid. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 8, 23–28.
4
AfzalI.RaufS.BasraS. M. A.MurtazaG. (2008). Halopriming improves vigor, metabolism of reserves and ionic contents in wheat seedlings under salt stress. Plant Soil Environ. 54, 382–388. 10.17221/408-PSE
5
AjouriA.AsgedomH.BeckerM. (2004). Seed priming enhances germination and seedling growth of barley under conditions of P and Zn deficiency. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 167, 630–636. 10.1002/jpln.200420425
6
AkhileshK. B.KavithaS. (2020). “A study on impact of technology intervention in the field of agriculture in India,” in Smart Technologies, eds K. B. Akhilesh and D. Möller (Singapore: Springer), 373–385. 10.1007/978-981-13-7139-4_28
7
AliN.KhanM. N.AshrafM. S.IjazS.Saeed-ur-RehmanH.AbdullahM.et al. (2020). Influence of different organic manures and their combinations on productivity and quality of bread wheat. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.20, 1949–1960. 10.1007/s42729-020-00266-2
8
AliQ.DaudM. K.HaiderM. Z.AliS.RizwanM.AslamN.et al. (2017). Seed priming by sodium nitroprusside improves salt tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by enhancing physiological and biochemical parameters. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 119, 50–58. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.08.010
9
AmrutaN.KumarM. P.KandikattuH. K.SarikaG.PuneethM. E.RanjithaH. P.et al. (2019). Bio-priming of rice seeds with novel bacterial strains, for management of seedborne Magnaporthe oryzae L. Plant Physiol. Rep. 24, 507–520. 10.1007/s40502-019-00492-6
10
ArunM. N.HebbarS. S.BhanuprakasK.SenthivelT. (2017). Seed priming improves irrigation water use efficiency, yield and yield components of summer cowpea under limited water conditions. Legume Res. 40, 864–871. 10.18805/LR-3785
11
AskariA.ArdakaniM. R.PaknejadF.HosseiniY. (2019). Effects of mycorrhizal symbiosis and seed priming on yield and water use efficiency of sesame under drought stress condition. Sci. Hortic.257, 108749. 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108749
12
BajehbajA. A. (2010). The effects of NaCl priming on salt tolerance in sunflower germination and seedling grown under salinity conditions. Afr. J. Biotechnol.9, 1764–1770. 10.5897/AJB10.1019
13
BajwaA. A.FarooqM.NawazA. (2018). Seed priming with sorghum extracts and benzyl aminopurine improves the tolerance against salt stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants24, 239–249. 10.1007/s12298-018-0512-9
14
BasraS. M. A.FarooqM.WahidA.KhanM. B. (2006). Rice seed invigoration by hormonal and vitamin priming. Seed Sci. Techn. 34, 753–758. 10.15258/sst.2006.34.3.23
15
BassiN.KumarM. D.SharmaA.Pardha-SaradhiP. (2014). Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. J. Hydrol. Reg. Studies2, 1–19. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001
16
BhowmickM. K.DuaryB.BiswasP. K.RakshitA.AdhikariB. (2013). Seed priming, row spacing and foliar nutrition in relation to growth and yield of chickpea under rainfed condition. SATSA Mukhapatra-Annu. Techn. Issue17, 114–119.
17
ChatterjeeN.SarkarD.SankarA.SumitaP. A. L.SinghH. B.SinghR. K.et al. (2018). On-farm seed priming interventions in agronomic crops. Acta Agric. Slov.111, 715–735. 10.14720/aas.2018.111.3.19
18
ChenK.AroraR. (2011). Dynamics of the antioxidant system during seed osmopriming, post-priming germination, and seedling establishment in spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Plant Sci. 180, 212–220. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.007
19
ChivasaW.HarrisD.NyamudezaP. (2001). On-farm seed priming: a key technology to improve crop establishment and yield in semi-arid tropics. Int. Sorgh. Mill. Newsletter. 42, 112–113.
20
CisseA.ArshadA.WangX.YattaraF.HuY. (2019). Contrasting impacts of long-term application of biofertilizers and organic manure on grain yield of winter wheat in North China Plain. Agronomy9:312. 10.3390/agronomy9060312
21
DamalasC. A.KoutroubasS. D.FotiadisS. (2019). Hydro-priming effects on seed germination and field performance of faba bean in spring sowing. Agriculture9:201. 10.3390/agriculture9090201
22
DevikaO. S.RakshitA. (2019). Economic appraisal of bio-priming mediated stress moderation in crop plants. Econ. Affairs64:295570. 10.30954/0424-2513.3.2019.12
23
Di GirolamoG.BarbantiL. (2012). Treatment conditions and biochemical processes influencing seed priming effectiveness. Ital. J. Agron. 7:e25. 10.4081/ija.2012.e25
24
DubeyP. K.SinghA.RaghubanshiA.AbhilashP. C. (2021a). Steering the restoration of degraded agroecosystems during the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. J. Environ. Manage.280, 111798. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111798
25
DubeyR. K.DubeyP. K.ChaurasiaR.RaoC. S.AbhilashP. C. (2021b). Impact of integrated agronomic practices on soil fertility and respiration on the indo-gangetic plain of North India. Agronomy11, 402. 10.3390/agronomy11020402
26
ENVIS Resource Partner on Biodiversity. (2020). Fragile Ecosystems of India. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, West Bengal. Available online at: http://www.bsienvis.nic.in/Database/FragileEcosystems_23603.aspx
27
FarooqM.BasraS. M.WahidA.AhmadN. (2010). Changes in nutrient-homeostasis and reserves metabolism during rice seed priming: consequences for seedling emergence and growth. Agricult. Sci. China9, 191–198. 10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60083-3
28
FarooqM.HussainM.HabibM. M.KhanM. S.AhmadI.FarooqS.et al. (2020). Influence of seed priming techniques on grain yield and economic returns of bread wheat planted at different spacings. Crop Past. Sci. 71, 725–738. 10.1071/CP20065
29
FarooqM.HussainM.NawazA.LeeD. J.AlghamdiS. S.SiddiqueK. H. (2017). Seed priming improves chilling tolerance in chickpea by modulating germination metabolism, trehalose accumulation and carbon assimilation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 111, 274–283. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.12.012
30
FarooqM.UsmanM.NadeemF.RehmanH.WahidA.BasraS. M.et al. (2019). Seed priming in field crops: potential benefits, adoption and challenges. Crop Past. Sci. 70, 731–771. 10.1071/CP18604
31
FerdousZ.UllahH.DattaA.AttiaA.RakshitA.MollaS. H. (2020). Application of biogas slurry in combination with chemical fertilizer enhances grain yield and profitability of maize (Zea mays L.). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.51, 2501–2510. 10.1080/00103624.2020.1844728
32
FuY.ZhangZ.LiuJ.ChenM.PanR.HuW.et al. (2020). Seed priming with spermidine and trehalose enhances chilling tolerance of rice via different mechanisms. J. Plant Growth Regul.39, 669–679. 10.1007/s00344-019-10009-y
33
Garcia-FrancoN.HobleyE.HübnerR.WiesmeierM. (2018). “Climate-smart soil management in semiarid regions,” in Soil Management and Climate Change. eds M. Á. Muñoz and R. Zornoza (Academic Press), 349–368. 10.1016/B978-0-12-812128-3.00023-9
34
GoelA.GoelA. K.SinghS. I. (2003). Changes in oxidative stress enzymes during artificial ageing in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seeds. J. Plant Physiol.160, 1093–1100. 10.1078/0176-1617-00881
35
González-OrozcoC. E.PorcelM.VelásquezD. F. A.Orduz-RodríguezJ. O. (2020). Extreme climate variability weakens a major tropical agricultural hub. Ecol. Indic.111:106015. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106015
36
GopalakrishnanT.KumarL. (2020). Modeling and mapping of soil salinity and its impact on paddy lands in jaffna peninsula, Sri Lanka. Sustainability12:8317. 10.3390/su12208317
37
HameedA.SheikhM. A.HameedA.FarooqT.BasraS. M. A.JamilA. (2013). Chitosan priming enhances the seed germination, antioxidants, hydrolytic enzymes, soluble proteins and sugars in wheat seeds. Agrochimica57, 97–110.
38
HussainM.FarooqM.SattarA.IjazM.SherA.Ul-AllahS. (2018). Mitigating the adverse effects of drought stress through seed priming and seed quality on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity. Pakistan J. Agricult. Sci. 55. 313–319. 10.21162/PAKJAS/18.5833
39
IbrahimE. A. (2016). Seed priming to alleviate salinity stress in germinating seeds. J. Plant Physiol.192, 38–46. 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.12.011
40
ImranM.MahmoodA.RömheldV.NeumannG. (2013). Nutrient seed priming improves seedling development of maize exposed to low root zone temperatures during early growth. Europ. J. Agronomy49, 141–148. 10.1016/j.eja.2013.04.001
41
IqbalM.AshrafM.JamilA. (2006). Seed enhancement with cytokinins: changes in growth and grain yield in salt stressed wheat plants. Plant Growth Regul.50, 29–39. 10.1007/s10725-006-9123-5
42
JavaidA. (2010). “Beneficial microorganisms for sustainable agriculture,” in Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming (Dordrecht: Springer), 347–369. 10.1007/978-90-481-8741-6_12
43
JishaK. C.VijayakumariK.PuthurJ. T. (2013). Seed priming for abiotic stress tolerance: an overview. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35, 1381–1396. 10.1007/s11738-012-1186-5
44
KarimM. R.RahmanM. A. (2015). Drought risk management for increased cereal production in Asian least developed countries. Weather Clim. Extremes. 7, 24–35. 10.1016/j.wace.2014.10.004
45
KhanH. A.PervezM. A.AyubC. M.ZiafK.BalalR. M.ShahidM. A.et al. (2009). Hormonal priming alleviates salt stress in hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Soil Environ. 28, 130–135.
46
KhanM. B.GurchaniM. A.HussainM.FreedS.MahmoodK. (2011). Wheat seed enhancement by vitamin and hormonal priming. Pak. J. Bot. 43, 1495–1499.
47
KumarP.AeronA.ShawN.SinghA.BajpaiV. K.PantS.et al. (2020). Seed bio-priming with tri-species consortia of phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria (PSR) and its effect on plant growth promotion. Heliyon6:e05701. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05701
48
KumarV.ShahidM.SinghA.SrivastavaM.MishraA.SrivastavaY. K.et al. (2014). Effect of biopriming with biocontrol agents Trichoderma harzianum (Th. Azad) and Trichoderma viride (01pp) on chickpea Genotype (Radhey). J. Plant Pathol Microb. 5:2.
49
LiJ.YinL. Y.JongsmaM. A.WangC. Y. (2011). Effects of light, hydropriming and abiotic stress on seed germination, and shoot and root growth of pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium). Ind. Crops Prod.34, 1543–1549. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.05.012
50
LuttsS.BenincasaP.WojtylaL.KubalaS.PaceR.LechowskaK.et al. (2016). “Seed priming: new comprehensive approaches for an old empirical technique,” in New Challenges in Seed Biology – Basic and Translational Research Driving Seed Technology, eds S. Araújo and A. Balestrazzi (Rijeka, Croatia: InTechOpen), 1–46. 10.5772/64420
51
MadhukeshwaraB. P.SajjanA. S. (2017). Influence of bio-priming on field performance and yield in maize hybrid. ACTA Sci. Agricult. 1, 16–19.
52
MangenaP. (2020). Effect of hormonal seed priming on germination, growth, yield and biomass allocation in soybean grown under induced drought stress. Indian J. Agricult. Res. 54:441. 10.18805/IJARe.A-441
53
MarthandanV.GeethaR.KumuthaK.RenganathanV. G.KarthikeyanA.RamalingamJ. (2020). Seed priming: a feasible strategy to enhance drought tolerance in crop plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21:8258. 10.3390/ijms21218258
54
McDonaldM. B. (2000). Seed Priming. Seed Technology and Its Biological Basis.Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 287–325.
55
MeenaS. K.RakshitA.MeenaV. S. (2016). Effect of seed bio-priming and N doses under varied soil type on nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under greenhouse conditions. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.6, 68–75. 10.1016/j.bcab.2016.02.010
56
Ministry of Environment and Forest govt. of India. (2012). Coastal Zones of India. Ahmedabad: Space Applications Centre.
57
MouradiM.BouizgarenA.FarissiM.LatrachL.QaddouryA.GhoulamC. (2016). Seed osmopriming improves plant growth, nodulation, chlorophyll fluorescence and nutrient uptake in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)–rhizobia symbiosis under drought stress. Sci. Hortic.213, 232–242. 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.002
58
MuhammadI.KollaM.VolkerR.GünterN. (2015). Impact of nutrient seed priming on germination, seedling development, nutritional status and grain yield of maize. J. Plant Nutr.38, 1803–1821. 10.1080/01904167.2014.990094
59
NawazA.AmjadM.PervezM. A.AfzalI. (2011). Effect of halopriming on germination and seedling vigor of tomato. Afr. J. Agric. Res.6, 3551–3559.
60
NawazJ.HussainM.JabbarA.NadeemG. A.SajidM.SubtainM. U.et al. (2013). Seed priming a technique. Int. J. Agricult. Crop Sci. 6:1373.
61
NedunchezhiyanV.VelusamyM.SubburamuK. (2020). Seed priming to mitigate the impact of elevated carbon dioxide associated temperature stress on germination in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 66, 83–95. 10.1080/03650340.2019.1599864
62
PaparellaS.AraújoS. S.RossiG.WijayasingheM.CarboneraD.BalestrazziA. (2015). Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Rep.34, 1281–1293. 10.1007/s00299-015-1784-y
63
PareraC. A.CantliffeD. J. (1994). Presowing seed priming. Hortic. Rev.16:109–11410.1002/9780470650561.ch4
64
PariharM.MeenaV. S.MishraP. K.RakshitA.ChoudharyM.YadavR. P.et al. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhiza: a viable strategy for soil nutrient loss reduction. Arch. Microbiol.201, 723–735. 10.1007/s00203-019-01653-9
65
PosmykM. M.JanasK. M. (2007). Effects of seed hydropriming in presence of exogenous proline on chilling injury limitation in Vigna radiata L. seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 29, 509–517. 10.1007/s11738-007-0061-2
66
QuZ.ZhaoH.ZhangH.WangQ.YaoY.ChengJ.et al. (2020). Bio-priming with a hypovirulent phytopathogenic fungus enhances the connection and strength of microbial interaction network in rapeseed. NPJ Biofilms Microb. 6:45. 10.1038/s41522-020-00157-5
67
RajS. N.ShettyN. P.ShettyH. S. (2004). Seed bio-priming with Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates enhances growth of pearl millet plants and induces resistance against downy mildew. Int. J. Pest Manag. 50, 41–48. 10.1080/09670870310001626365
68
RakshitA.PalS.MeenaS.ManjheeB.RaiS.RaiA.et al. (2014). Seed bio-priming: a potential tool in integrated resource management. SATSA Mukhaptra Annu, Techn. Issue. 18, 94–103.
69
RakshitA.PalS.RaiS.RaiA.BhowmickM. K.SinghH. B. (2013). Micronutrient seed priming: a potential tool in integrated nutrient management. SATSA Mukhaptra Ann. Techn. Issue. 17, 77–89.
70
RakshitA.SinghH. B. (Eds.). (2018). Advances in Seed Priming. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978-981-13-0032-5
71
RawatL.SinghY.ShuklaN.KumarJ. (2012). Seed biopriming with salinity tolerant isolates of Trichoderma harzianum alleviates salt stress in rice: growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics. J. Plant Path. 353–365.
72
RehmanA.FarooqM.NaveedM.NawazA.ShahzadB. (2018). Seed priming of Zn with endophytic bacteria improves the productivity and grain biofortification of bread wheat. Europ. J. Agronomy94, 98–107. 10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.017
73
RehmanH.KamranM.BasraS. M. A.AfzalI.FarooqM. (2015). Influence of seed priming on performance and water productivity of direct seeded rice in alternating wetting and drying. Rice Sci. 22, 189–196. 10.1016/j.rsci.2015.03.001
74
SadeghiH.KhazaeiF.YariL.SheidaeiS. (2011). Effect of seed osmopriming on seed germination behavior and vigor of soybean (Glycine max L.). ARPN J. Agricult. Biol. Sci. 6, 39–43.
75
SaravanakumarD.SamiyappanR. (2007). ACC deaminase from Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated saline resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) plants. J. Appl. Microbiol.102, 1283–1292. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03179.x
76
SarkarD.ChattopadhyayA.SinghS.DevikaO. S.PalS.PariharM.et al. (2020b). “Modulation of microbiome through seed bio-priming,” in Trichoderma: Agricultural Applications and Beyond. Soil Biology, Vol. 61., eds C. Manoharachary, H. B. Singh, and A. Varma (Cham: Springer), 209–218. 10.1007/978-3-030-54758-5_10
77
SarkarD.KarS. K.ChattopadhyayA.RakshitA.TripathiV. K.DubeyP. K.et al. (2020a). Low input sustainable agriculture: a viable climate-smart option for boosting food production in a warming world. Ecol. Indic.115:106412. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106412
78
SarkarD.PalS.MehjabeenM.SinghV.SinghS.PulS.et al. (2018). “Addressing stresses in agriculture through bio-priming intervention,” in Advances in Seed Priming, eds A. Rakshit and H. B. Singh (Singapore: Springer), 107–113. 10.1007/978-981-13-0032-5_7
79
SarkarD.PalS.SinghH. B.YadavR. S.RakshitA. (2017b). “Harnessing bio-priming for integrated resource management under changing climate,” in Advances in PGPR Research, eds H. B. Singh, B. K. Sarma, and C. Keswani (London, UK: CAB International), 349–363.
80
SarkarD.RakshitA.Al-TurkiA. I.SayyedR. Z.DattaR. (2021). Connecting bio-priming approach with integrated nutrient management for improved nutrient use efficiency in crop species. Agriculture11:372. 10.3390/agriculture11040372
81
SarkarD.ShikhaR. S.GangulyS.RakshitA. (2017a). Management of increasing soil pollution in the ecosystem. Adv. Res.12, 1–9. 10.9734/AIR/2017/36622
82
SergakiC.LagunasB.LidburyI.GiffordM. L.SchäferP. (2018). Challenges and approaches in microbiome research: from fundamental to applied. Front. Plant Sci.9:1205. 10.3389/fpls.2018.01205
83
ShabbirI.AyubM.TahirM.BilalM.TanveerA.HussainM.et al. (2014). Impact of priming techniques on emergence and seedling growth of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes. Scientia1, 92–96. 10.15192/PSCP.SA.2014.1.3.9296
84
ShahH.JalwatT.ArifM.MirajG. (2012). Seed priming improves early seedling growth and nutrient uptake in mungbean. J. Plant Nutr.35, 805–816. 10.1080/01904167.2012.663436
85
ShanthalaJ.SiddarajuR. (2013). Effect of hydro priming on biochemical properties sunflower hybrid and its parental line during seeds storage. Int. J. Plant Sci.8, 221–229.
86
ShivayY. S.SinghU.PrasadR.KaurR. (2016). Agronomic interventions for micronutrient biofortification of pulses. Indian J. Agron61, 161–172.
87
ShivelyG.GalopinM. (2013). An overview of benefit-cost analysis. Available online at: http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/classes/crp274/swenson/URP290/Readings/Purdue_An%20Overview%20of%20Benefit.pdf
88
SinghH.JassalR. K.KangJ. S.SandhuS. S.KangH.GrewalK. (2015). Seed priming techniques in field crops-a review. Agric. Rev.36, 251–264. 10.18805/ag.v36i4.6662
89
SinghH.ReddyM. S. (2011). Effect of inoculation with phosphate solubilizing fungus on growth and nutrient uptake of wheat and maize plants fertilized with rock phosphate in alkaline soils. Eur. J. Soil Biol.47, 30–34. 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.10.005
90
SinghM.DotaniyaM. L.MishraA.DotaniyaC. K.RegarK. L.LataM. (2016). “Role of biofertilizers in conservation agriculture,” in Conservation Agriculture (Singapore: Springer), 13–134. 10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_4
91
SinghV.UpadhyayR. S.SarmaB. K.SinghH. B. (2016). Seed bio-priming with Trichoderma asperellum effectively modulate plant growth promotion in pea. Int. J. Agricult. Environ. Biotechnol. 9, 361–365. 10.5958/2230-732X.2016.00047.4
92
SrivastavaA. K.LokhandeV. H.PatadeV. Y.SuprasannaP.SjahrilR.D'SouzaS. F. (2010). Comparative evaluation of hydro-, chemo-, and hormonal-priming methods for imparting salt and PEG stress tolerance in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Acta Physiol. Plant. 32, 1135–1144. 10.1007/s11738-010-0505-y
93
TabassumT.FarooqM.AhmadR.ZohaibA.WahidA.ShahidM. (2018). Terminal drought and seed priming improves drought tolerance in wheat. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants24, 845–856. 10.1007/s12298-018-0547-y
94
TimmuskS.Abd El-DaimI. A.CopoloviciL.TanilasT.KännasteA.BehersL.et al. (2014). Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. PLoS ONE. 9:e96086. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096086
95
TisarumR.TheerawitayaC.SamphumphuangT.PolispitakK.ThongpoemP.SinghH. P.et al. (2020). Alleviation of salt stress in upland rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica cv. Leum Pua) using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation. Front. Plant Sci.11:348. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00348
96
UlfatA. N. E. E. L. A.MajidS. A.HameedA. (2017). Hormonal seed priming improves wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) field performance under drought and non-stress conditions. Pak. J. Bot.49, 1239–1253.
97
VarierA.VariA. K.DadlaniM. (2010). The subcellular basis of seed priming. Curr. Sci.450–456.
98
VurukondaS. S. K. P.VardharajulaS.ShrivastavaM.Sk,ZA. (2016). Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol. Res.184, 13–24. 10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003
99
WaniM. H. (2011). Hill agriculture in India: problems and prospects of mountain agriculture. Ind. J. Agricult. Econ.66, 64–66. 10.22004/ag.econ.204732
100
WojtylaŁ.LechowskaK.KubalaS.GarnczarskaM. (2016). Molecular processes induced in primed seeds—increasing the potential to stabilize crop yields under drought conditions. J. Plant Physiol.203, 116–126. 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.04.008
101
XuS.HuJ.LiY.MaW.ZhengY.ZhuS. (2011). Chilling tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum induced by seed priming with putrescine. Plant Growth Regul.63, 279–290. 10.1007/s10725-010-9528-z
102
ZulfiqarF. (2021). Effect of seed priming on horticultural crops. Scientia Hortic.286:110197. 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110197
Summary
Keywords
seed treatment, biotic and abiotic stresses, hydropriming, mitigation strategies, crop performance
Citation
Devika OS, Singh S, Sarkar D, Barnwal P, Suman J and Rakshit A (2021) Seed Priming: A Potential Supplement in Integrated Resource Management Under Fragile Intensive Ecosystems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5:654001. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.654001
Received
15 January 2021
Accepted
25 May 2021
Published
07 July 2021
Volume
5 - 2021
Edited by
Urs Feller, University of Bern, Switzerland
Reviewed by
Mohamed Sheteiwy, Mansoura Universiy, Egypt; Mohammad Ehsan Dulloo, Alliance Bioversity International and CIAT, France
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Devika, Singh, Sarkar, Barnwal, Suman and Rakshit.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Deepranjan Sarkar deep.gogreen@gmail.comAmitava Rakshit amitavar@bhu.ac.in
This article was submitted to Agroecology and Ecosystem Services, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.