In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. There was a mis-transcription of RC and BB values (OM, N tot, C org, C/N). CFM was also incorrectly written as FCM. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.
Table 1
| Parameters | Amendment | Soil | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC | BB | CFM | T1 | C-T2 | BD-T2 | C-T4 | BD-T4 | |
| DM (%) | 93.80 | 25.17 | 14.75 | 76.75 | 72.70 | 74.41 | 78.84 | 78.58 |
| OM (%) | 93.94 | 96.32 | 65.36 | 5.82 | 5.90 | 7.55 | 5.38 | 5.51 |
| N tot (%) | 3.77 | 3.10 | 1.48 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.35 |
| C org (%) | 54.41 | 55.87 | 37.96 | 3.38 | 3.42 | 4.38 | 3.16 | 3.61 |
| C/N | 14.43 | 18.02 | 25.65 | 10.62 | 11.08 | 11.93 | 10.19 | 10.41 |
| pH | 8.89 | 7.47 | 7.49 | 7.41 | 7.34 | 7.49 | ||
| CE (dS/m) | 8.19 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 2.43 | 0.88 | 1.04 | ||
| P (ppm) | 229 | 260 | 207 | 195 | 174 | |||
| Fe (ppm) | < 0.2 | 63 | 58 | 250 | 64 | 160 | ||
| Mn (ppm) | 126.26 | 12 | 12 | 195 | 29 | 31 | ||
| Cu (ppm) | 14.7 | 9 | 8 | 14 | 9 | 10 | ||
| Zn (ppm) | 75.85 | 15 | 14 | 18 | 14 | 11 | ||
| B (ppm) | 17.42 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Cd (ppm) | < 0.2 | < 0.2 | < 0.2 | < 0.2 | < 0.2 | < 0.2 | ||
| Pb (ppm) | 7 | 20 | 17 | 15 | 25 | 22 | ||
| Hg (ppm) | < 0.5 | < 0.5 | < 0.5 | < 0.5 | < 0.5 | < 0.5 | ||
| Ni (ppm) | 3 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 16 | 16 | ||
| Cr (ppm) | 5 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 24 | 23 | ||
Physicochemical values [dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), total N, organic C, C/N ratio (C org/N tot), pH, EC, some available nutrients and presence of heavy metals] of the amendments used for the biodisinfestation treatment: RC (rapeseed cake); BB (beer bagasse); CFM (cow fresh manure).
Soil physicochemical values of biodisinfested (BD) and control (C) soils at three different times: T1 (pre-treatment), T2 (post-treatment), and T4 (one year post-treatment). All parameters are expressed in dry weight.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
rapeseed cake, beer bagasse, organic amendment, solarization, root-knot nematode, nematode guilds, sub-lethal temperatures
Citation
Gandariasbeitia M, López-Pérez JA, Juaristi B, Abaunza L and Larregla S (2023) Corrigendum: Biodisinfestation with agricultural by-products developed long-term suppressive soils against Meloidogyne incognita in lettuce crop. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7:1323732. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1323732
Received
18 October 2023
Accepted
30 October 2023
Published
15 November 2023
Volume
7 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
Jesus Fernandez Bayo, University of California, Davis, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Gandariasbeitia, López-Pérez, Juaristi, Abaunza and Larregla.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maite Gandariasbeitia mgandariasbeitia@neiker.eus
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.