Abstract
Introduction:
The palm oil sector is vital for Cameroon's smallholder farmers but is increasingly scrutinized for its environmental impacts, including deforestation, soil degradation, and waste mismanagement. Bridging productivity and sustainability demands integrated strategies that support farmer livelihoods while meeting global climate and conservation goals.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic literature review and analytical synthesis of peer-reviewed studies, industry reports, and technical guidelines on Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs), Good Management Practices (GMPs), diversified cropping systems, fertilizer regimes, and waste valorization in oil palm systems. Drawing on this evidence base, we constructed two decision-support frameworks: one for sustainable palm oil production and another for circular-economy waste management.
Results:
Our review confirms that adopting GAPs and GMPs such as soil conservation, optimized fertilizer application, and integrated pest management yields 10–20% gains in yield and income for smallholders, while intercropping enhances land-use efficiency, soil organic matter, and greenhouse-gas mitigation. The sustainable-production framework emphasizes no-deforestation in High Carbon Stock or High Conservation Value areas, prohibits slash-and-burn practices, and integrates incentives (e.g., carbon credits, subsidized inputs) to drive compliance. The waste-management framework demonstrates that palm oil mill residues and effluents can be transformed into organic fertilizers, biogas, bioethanol, and biocomposites, unlocking additional revenue streams and closing nutrient loops.
Discussion:
Implementing these frameworks requires strengthening certification schemes, capacity-building, and targeted smallholder support to overcome financial and technical barriers. By synergizing production efficiency, environmental safeguards, and waste valorization, Cameroon's smallholder sector can transition to a resilient, low-carbon model. Scaling these strategies promises to enhance farmer livelihoods, reduce sector-wide emissions by at least 25%, and contribute meaningfully to national climate-mitigation and biodiversity conservation goals.
Highlights
Sustainable practices enhance productivity and support smallholder livelihoods.
Good Agricultural Practices improve soil health and reduce chemical inputs.
Renewable energy from PO biomass reduces GHG emissions and environmental impact.
Certification schemes and smallholder support foster sustainable palm oil production.
Integrated waste management transforms PO waste into valuable products.
1 Introduction
The oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) is a vital agricultural commodity, accounting for approximately 40% of global vegetable oil production while occupying only 5–7% of the land used for oil crops (Erniwati et al., 2017; Lintemani et al., 2019). Notably, it is highly productive, yielding significantly more oil per hectare than other oilseed crops (Zamri et al., 2022; Sarzynski et al., 2020). Over the past decade, global oil palm (OP) expansion has surged from 19.5 million to 29.1 million hectares, contributing to economic growth and improved living standards in many communities (Masyithoh and Nurjannah, 2024; Said et al., 2022). Additionally, palm oil (PO) plays an essential role as a raw material in various industries, with demand expected to increase due to population growth, rising biofuel consumption, cost-effectiveness, and long shelf life (Hariz et al., 2023; Putri et al., 2021). Indonesia is a leading contributor, accounting for a significant share of global production (Fatmasari et al., 2018).
Despite its economic benefits, rapid expansion in OP cultivation presents environmental and socioeconomic challenges, including habitat destruction, biodiversity loss, and greenhouse gas emissions (Lee et al., 2013; Guillaume et al., 2018). In Cameroon, a major PO producer in Central Africa, production reached ~450,000 tons in 2020, although a substantial gap remains between local production and demand (Ndam et al., 2024). The country has 270,000 hectares of OP plantations, with industrial plantations producing 180,000 tons and smallholder plantations contributing 90,000 tons (Ayompe et al., 2021). However, processing inefficiencies among smallholder farmers limit extraction rates, emphasizing the need for improved techniques (Khatib and Šišák, 2014).
While industrial mills in Cameroon yield 2-3 tons of crude PO per hectare, smallholder farmers produce only about 1 ton per hectare, largely due to limited resources, unsustainable practices, and market constraints (Kome and Tabi, 2020; Nkongho et al., 2014). Achieving sustainable PO production requires balancing productivity, conservation, and community welfare (Tchindjang et al., 2022). Proposed frameworks emphasize agroecological principles, integrated pest management, and community-based resource utilization (Dislich et al., 2016; Saifullah et al., 2018), offering smallholders viable pathways toward sustainability.
Despite government initiatives, persistent challenges include trust issues and contractual disputes between smallholders and large mills (Nkongho et al., 2015). Recent partnerships with organizations like UNIDO aim to build or refurbish PO mills to support smallholders (Ayompe et al., 2023). However, additional obstacles such as poor-quality planting materials, aging plantations, high input costs, and inadequate financing and technical support remain critical concerns (Nchu and Koona, 2020). Addressing these barriers is essential for ensuring the long-term sustainability and viability of Cameroon's PO sector.
This paper explores frameworks to help smallholder farmers in Cameroon and beyond achieve sustainable PO production. By analyzing the current state and identifying effective practices, we provide practical recommendations for farmers, policymakers, and stakeholders. Specifically, we aim to (1) identify sustainability issues, (2) develop a framework depicting small-scale PO production status, (3) develop frameworks for sustainable PO production and waste management, and (4) provide recommendations to achieve sustainable PO production.
2 Methods
A mixed-methods approach was adopted to investigate smallholder OP farming practices, identify sustainability challenges, and explore pathways for sustainable PO production in Cameroon. The study combined primary field data with secondary literature and integrated preliminary inferential analyses to deepen the empirical basis for the findings.
2.1 Field survey
Between July and September 2021, a structured field survey was conducted among 125 smallholder OP farmers in the Fako Division of Cameroon's South West Region. A stratified random sampling strategy ensured the inclusion of participants from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire, which covered aspects such as land use, input utilization, labor allocation, yields, processing methods, market access, and support services. Informed consent was obtained from all participants after they were briefed on the study's objectives and their rights. The collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
The survey population comprised predominantly male oil palm farmers, with 95.2% (119 out of 125) being male and only 4.8% (6) female. No farmers were under the age of 21; 8.0% were aged 21–30 years, 16.8% fell within the 31–40-year range, 26.4% were between 41 and 50, 24.8% were between 51 and 60, and 24.0% were over 60 years of age. In terms of education, 5.6% had no formal education, while the majority, 54.4%, possessed a First School Leaving Certificate; 20.8% had completed the GCE O level/CAP, 12% had attained the GCE A level/BAC, and 7.2% held a Bachelor's degree, with no respondents reporting a Certificate or Higher National Diploma (HND). Regarding household income, 6.4% of the respondents reported an annual income between $182 and $727, 24% earned between $728 and $1,455, 24.8% had incomes ranging from $1,456 to $1,818, and 44.8% earned more than $1,818 per annum. The average household size was seven members.
2.2 Literature review and data triangulation
An extensive literature review was undertaken to supplement the fieldwork and provide a broader context for sustainable PO production and waste management practices. Key electronic databases including Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were systematically searched with structured queries using Boolean operators and keywords such as “sustainable palm oil,” “oil palm smallholder Cameroon,” “waste management in palm oil production,” “Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs),” “Good Management Practices (GMPs),” and “circular economy.” Additional insights were garnered through hand searches of reference lists and gray literature, including government reports and publications by international agencies. The integration of findings from the literature with the survey data allowed for preliminary triangulation, which helped in framing two conceptual models: one for sustainable production practices and another for effective waste management strategies. This triangulation, however, remains primarily conceptual without robust empirical validation and lacks a systematic gender or institutional lens.
3 Results and analysis of smallholder PO production: sustainability issues and production framework
In this section, we present the results from our research on smallholder palm oil production in Cameroon by examining key sustainability challenges and introducing a conceptual framework that maps the current production status. Our analysis reveals that production is influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including environmental challenges such as deforestation and habitat loss, socio-economic difficulties like limited access to quality inputs and technical support, and operational inefficiencies that result in low oil extraction rates. These factors are not isolated; rather, they create an interconnected web of challenges wherein environmental degradation affects soil quality and yields, which in turn are compounded by socio-economic constraints limiting the adoption of improved agricultural techniques. To address these multifaceted issues, we propose a diagnostic framework that visually outlines the entire production process, from land preparation and cultivation to processing and waste management, while highlighting critical gaps and inefficiencies.
3.1 Key sustainability issues in smallholder palm oil production
3.1.1 Smallholders and their challenges
Smallholder OP farmers, as defined by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), cultivate <50 hectares using primarily family labor. They play a crucial role in the global PO industry, contributing approximately 40% of the plantation area and nearly 50% of production (Nagiah and Azmi, 2012). These farmers are categorized into independent smallholders, who manage their plantations autonomously, and scheme smallholders, who are linked to specific mills through contracts with agro-industrial companies. Despite their significant contributions, smallholders face numerous challenges that hinder productivity and sustainability, including poor-quality planting materials, aging plantations, low yields, and high input costs. Furthermore, limited access to technical information regarding good agricultural practices (GAPs), insufficient training, financial constraints, poor market access, land tenure insecurity, and reliance on low-skilled labor, including child labor, exacerbate their situation (Pahri et al., 2023). Multiple intermediaries and inefficient processing methods contribute to low extraction rates, poor quality, and short shelf life of the PO produced by smallholders (Rizal et al., 2021).
3.1.2 Farming systems
Smallholder OP farming systems are integral to enhancing both the productivity and sustainability of PO production. Characterized by their diversity, these systems reflect the socio-economic and environmental contexts of the farmers involved. Typically, smallholders integrate OP cultivation with other agricultural activities, such as food crops like cassava and maize, and livestock rearing. This intercropping practice, particularly during the early growth stages of OP, optimizes land use, contributes to additional income streams, and bolsters household food security (Nchanji et al., 2015). The integration of different crops allows smallholder farmers to create a resilient farming system adapted to household food security needs, market fluctuations, and environmental challenges (Euler et al., 2016).
Labor dynamics within smallholder OP farming systems reveal a reliance on both family and hired labor. From 52 reviewed studies, 63.5% of smallholders use both family and hired labor, while 15.4% rely solely on family labor. Field survey results indicated that 88.0% of smallholders use both hired and family labor, and 9.6% use only family labor (Figure 1a). This labor structure suggests that smallholders not only depend on family members for agricultural tasks but also contribute to local employment by hiring additional workers. Moreover, the choice of the OP cultivar used by smallholders, as reported in 42 studies, shows a preference for Dura (64.3%), followed by Tenera (31.0%) and Pisifera (4.8%). The predominance of Dura, a local breed, highlights the importance of traditional practices in smallholder farming, while Tenera, a commercial hybrid, represents the potential for improved yields through selective breeding (Pahri et al., 2023). Overall, the farming systems employed by smallholders balance economic viability with environmental stewardship (Rizal et al., 2021).
Figure 1
3.1.3 Good agricultural practices
Good agricultural practices (GAP) are crucial for productivity and sustainability in smallholder OP cultivation. These include quality planting materials, maintaining proper planting densities (120-150 palms/hectare), effective pest and disease management, appropriate fertilizer application, and timely harvesting (Woittiez et al., 2018). Fertilizer use is vital, as Tenera yields can drop from 20 to 25 tons/hectare to about 10 tons/hectare without fertilizers (Sigalingging, 2024). Our review found 56.3% of studies reported smallholders have access to quality seeds, and 57.1% use fertilizers (Figure 1c). Field surveys showed 44.8% use both pesticides and improved seeds, while 25.6% use fertilizers, pesticides, and improved seeds. Waste recycling is important for soil fertilization, waste reduction, and bioenergy production. Our field survey revealed 1.6% of smallholders use PO waste for biofuel/biogas, 91.2% use palm fibers as biofuel, and 88.8% use empty kernel shells as biofuel.
Despite the 25-year production cycle for OP, African yields are below the yields obtained in Asia and South America (Figure 1b), averaging around 3 tons of PO/hectare annually (Woittiez et al., 2017). Small-scale producers in Cameroon use <30% of the inputs used by large-scale producers, yielding about 5 tons of FFB/hectare compared to 19.3 tons for agro-industries (Folefack et al., 2019). The highest-yielding smallholder farms average only 7.7 tons of FFB/hectare/year, well below the potential 20 tons FFB/hectare/year for Cameroon (Ordway et al., 2017). In Ghana, average smallholder OP yields are 7.0 tons FFB/hectare/year (Rhebergen et al., 2018), while in Malaysia, smallholder yields vary (6.9–37.4 tons FFB/hectare/year) (Al-Khudhairy et al., 2023). These figures show the efficiency of smallholder OP plantations in Africa is below potential, implying that improving yields would spare land for nature and increase economic viability (Soliman et al., 2016). Intercropping is widely practiced, with over 80% of studies reporting its use. Smallholders often intercrop food crops like cassava, plantains, cocoyams, and maize (Sapalina et al., 2022). Agroforestry is also common, with 59.0% of studies indicating mixed agroforestry practices (Figure 1d). In immature OP plantations, 95.2% of respondents practiced intercropping, while 67.2% of mature plantations practiced monocropping.
3.1.4 Land conversion and tenure
Land conversion and tenure are pivotal factors influencing the sustainability of OP cultivation. The conversion of land for OP plantations often results in significant environmental repercussions, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, and increased greenhouse gas emissions. A review of 57 studies indicates that approximately 50% of land converted for OP cultivation originates from forested areas, with 30% from secondary forests and 20% from primary forests (Figure 2a). Additionally, around 25% of conversions are from degraded lands, while 26.3% stem from wild or natural OP groves (Zhao, 2024). Field surveys reveal that a substantial portion of smallholders (59.2%) cultivate OP on forested land, exacerbating ecological degradation (Herdiansyah, 2024). To mitigate these adverse effects, adopting sustainable land management practices is essential, as these can help balance agricultural productivity with environmental conservation (Ariesca et al., 2023).
Figure 2
Secure land tenure is crucial for fostering long-term investments in sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers. Survey data show that 46.8% of smallholders purchased their land, while 22.6% owned it outright, 21.8% utilized community land, and 5.6% rented. However, land tenure insecurity poses significant challenges as it discourages investments in land improvement and sustainable practices due to fears of land grabbing by more powerful entities (Hamid, 2023). The lack of formal land titles limits smallholders‘ access to credit and financial services, which are vital for enhancing productivity and sustainability (Apriyanto et al., 2022). Implementing policies that ensure secure land tenure can promote sustainable land management, improve agricultural yields, and enhance the livelihoods of smallholders (Abas et al., 2021). Programs aimed at facilitating land titling can significantly bolster smallholders' land rights, thereby encouraging sustainable farming investments and practices (Suryaningsih, 2023).
3.1.5 PO milling practices
PO milling practices critically influence efficiency, quality, and cost in smallholder PO production. In Africa, traditional manual milling methods are common, yet labor-intensive and often inefficient. Approximately 73% of smallholders use artisanal mills for processing FFB, with field surveys indicating a reliance rate of 91.7% (Figure 2b). While artisanal mills reduce labor demands, they also raise production costs, adversely affecting PO pricing. These mills often produce lower quality outputs due to inefficient extraction processes, with 63% of smallholders using manual vertical presses and 14% relying on hand-operated screw presses (Figure 2c). The cost of manual mills is around $400, while more efficient semi-automated mills can cost up to $35,000 (Anyaoha and Zhang, 2022).
3.1.6 Milling efficiencies and extraction rates
A major challenge for smallholder PO production in Africa is the low milling efficiencies or extraction rates, which are crucial for economic viability. The extraction process includes reception, sterilization, and threshing of FFBs, followed by digestion and pressing to extract PO, which is then purified and dried for storage and commercialization (Suroso et al., 2021). Studies indicate many smallholders experience extraction rates below 20%, with rates in Cameroon ranging from 8% to 12%. A literature review of 41 studies revealed 41% reported extraction rates below 15%, 38% between 15% and 20%, and 21% above 20% (Figure 2d). These low rates affect both the quantity and quality of PO produced, as traditional and artisanal methods used by smallholders are less efficient than mechanized alternatives (Hong, 2024).
3.2 Existing framework for small-scale PO production
Smallholder farmers frequently employ slash-and-burn techniques to establish OP plantations, which drastically diminish ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and water regulation (Er et al., 2011). Additionally, they often face significant constraints, including limited access to training, agricultural inputs, and financing, all of which impede the transition to sustainable practices. Many smallholders rely on low-skilled and child labor, raising serious social concerns (Sibhatu, 2019). The lack of access to fertilizers further hampers productivity, as it limits opportunities to enhance yields and income (Naidua et al., 2021). Regarding cultivation methods, intercropping is prevalent in immature plantations ( ≤ 5 years), while monocropping dominates in mature plantations (>5 years), illustrating a widespread reliance on traditional farming approaches (Anyaoha et al., 2018b).
Following OP cultivation, FFBs are processed into low-grade PO using inefficient traditional milling systems. Solid biomass is either left to rot or used as fuel, while liquid waste (POME) is discharged into the environment, leading to severe pollution (Stichnothe and Schuchardt, 2010). Alarmingly, land conversion from forests to OP plantations contributes 75–80% of greenhouse gas emissions, while POME accounts for another 18–23%, further intensifying climate change concerns (Acobta et al., 2023). This highlights the urgent need for sustainable land-use strategies and effective waste management solutions (Ewelike et al., 2021). Our proposed framework (Figure 3) maps out the existing PO production processes employed by smallholders in Africa, emphasizing sustainability challenges. Many smallholder farmers lack access to capacity-building programs, agricultural inputs, and financing, exacerbating environmental degradation and inefficient resource use. Furthermore, the widespread land conversion and reliance on chemical fertilizers contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Although OP cultivation produces useful outputs such as EFBs, old palm trunks, POME, and palm fronds, a large portion of these waste streams remain underutilized, resulting in environmental hazards and missed livelihood opportunities.
Figure 3
4 Discussion on sustainable PO production
In this section, we integrate improved production practices, effective waste management, and practical recommendations to advance sustainable palm oil production. Our approach guides smallholder farmers and stakeholders to move from traditional methods to innovative practices that boost yields while responsibly managing natural resources and reducing deforestation, emissions, and pollution. We stress the importance of repurposing waste, from solid residues to effluent, into valuable resources like biofertilizers, biochar, and renewable energy, thereby fostering a circular economy. Additionally, we propose step-by-step strategies, including Good Agricultural Practices and market incentives such as carbon credits, to ensure these sustainable solutions are accessible to all. Overall, this section provides a clear roadmap for practices that benefit both the environment and local communities.
4.1 Sustainable palm oil production
Promoting sustainable OP cultivation requires a comprehensive approach that integrates land and climate suitability, productivity practices, biodiversity management, sustainability certification, and social responsibility. The High Carbon Stock (HCS) and High Conservation Value (HCV) frameworks are fundamental in mitigating the environmental impact of OP plantations, guiding the preservation of critical ecosystems and biodiversity (Zhao, 2024; Ramlah, 2024). The consequences of unsustainable PO production are severe, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem degradation (Murphy et al., 2021). Despite ongoing debates surrounding its environmental footprint, PO remains the most widely produced and consumed vegetable oil globally, emphasizing the necessity for certified sustainable production to address climate and conservation concerns (Chiriacò et al., 2022).
A truly sustainable PO production system maximizes income generation, resource efficiency, and waste minimization, which can be achieved through innovative strategies such as valorizing by-products, recycling POME, utilizing biogas, and improving wastewater management (Supriatna, 2024). Beyond environmental preservation, sustainability also enhances social equity, ensuring economic gains are distributed within local farming communities (Abas et al., 2021). The overarching objective is to eliminate deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions, land disputes, and exploitative labor practices while positioning PO production as a driver of sustainable development (Sagar et al., 2019). Smallholders play a pivotal role in advancing sustainable agricultural practices, and their participation in certification programs is crucial for improving the global marketability of PO (Sukiyono et al., 2022). As consumer demand for sustainably sourced products continues to rise, the PO industry must adapt by implementing responsible production strategies that address environmental, social, and economic challenges, including recent EU import restrictions (Setiajiati et al., 2024).
4.1.1 Conserving forests and biodiversity
Natural habitats play a vital role in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services within tropical agricultural landscapes. Their conservation is essential for protecting threatened species and ensuring long-term ecosystem sustainability. Strategically positioning OP plantations near diverse land-use systems can support biodiversity by creating transitional spaces for various species (Davis, 2024). Additionally, preserving small forest fragments within OP plantations sustains native species diversity while contributing to critical ecosystem services (Hatfield et al., 2019). Research highlights the significance of forest cover in agricultural landscapes, as it enhances biodiversity through a spillover effect, reducing species isolation and strengthening ecosystem resilience (Martinez-Ramos et al., 2016). Furthermore, scattered trees within OP monocultures positively influence biodiversity by regulating essential ecosystem functions (Sreekar et al., 2013).
With increasing consumer demand for deforestation-free PO, sustainable industry practices are becoming more urgent (Decaëns et al., 2018). Effective management of OP expansion is critical to prevent further deforestation and avoid substantial biodiversity losses (Louis, 2024). Studies indicate that prioritizing deforestation reduction is a more effective climate change mitigation strategy than forest conversion for biofuel production, as it supports global biodiversity commitments (Bieng et al., 2022). Consequently, strengthening environmental governance and policies is necessary to minimize forest clearance and encourage responsible land-use practices (Rocha et al., 2015). Protecting natural forests within or near OP plantations and prioritizing oil palm development on low-yielding pastures can harness ecosystem services while optimizing agricultural production (Kadir et al., 2021). Additionally, maintaining forested riparian reserves has proven to support local fish species richness and functional diversity, particularly in vulnerable rainforest streams (Elsen et al., 2018).
4.1.2 Increasing productivity
Smallholder OP plantations often have lower productivity due to limited fertilizer application and resource constraints. To enhance nutrient use efficiency, balanced fertilizer applications, maintaining ground cover vegetation, and utilizing EFBs as organic amendments are essential (Atik et al., 2020). Increasing smallholder awareness of management requirements throughout the plantation life cycle can significantly boost productivity (Soliman et al., 2016). However, barriers such as limited access to credit and agricultural inputs hinder productivity improvement (Krishna et al., 2017). The productivity of OP plantations relies heavily on quality planting materials, water, fertilizers, sunlight, and effective management. Timely processing of harvested FFBs is critical to maintaining PO and PKO quality, as delays can degrade oil quality and increase refining costs (Ayompe et al., 2021).
Artisanal mills, while convenient for smallholders, often produce lower-quality oil compared to mechanized mills. Efficient and timely processing in mechanized facilities can significantly enhance both the quantity and quality of PO (Ayompe et al., 2023). Addressing challenges through improved access to inputs, credit, and training programs is essential for enabling smallholders to enhance productivity and sustainability (Veriasa, 2024). Integrating sustainable practices into smallholder operations is vital for increasing productivity while minimizing environmental impacts. Optimizing fertilizer recommendations based on soil and leaf analysis can improve fertilization strategies, thereby enhancing productivity (Hutabarat et al., 2019). Additionally, adopting innovative technologies and practices like precision agriculture and agroforestry can further enhance productivity and sustainability in smallholder OP plantations (Lee et al., 2013).
4.1.3 Implementing good agricultural practices
Implementing GAP is vital for optimizing yields and ensuring sustainability in OP cultivation. Recommended planting densities of 120–150 palms per hectare, coupled with effective canopy management of 40–60 fronds based on OP age, are key for maximizing productivity (Ntsiapane et al., 2023). Additionally, using irrigation and fertilizers can mitigate unsuitable soil and rainfall effects, but the high costs of fertilizers often deter farmers, especially in regions with limited financial resources (Veriasa, 2024). Addressing financial constraints is crucial for enhancing smallholder plantation productivity.
In Cameroon, poor yields are mainly due to inadequate GAP implementation, suboptimal planting materials, inefficient planting patterns, and limited nutrient application (Soliman et al., 2016). Many smallholders use low-input, low-output systems due to financial limitations and lack of access to quality inputs, exacerbating productivity issues (Cousins, 2012). Improving access to finance and quality planting materials is essential for productivity. While some farmers have improved planting material quality, high fertilizer costs remain a significant barrier (Feliciano, 2019). Government initiatives like FONADER funding (1978-1991) played a crucial role in providing improved OP seeds and subsidized fertilizers, promoting GAP adoption (Chalil and Barus, 2020). To further enhance productivity, priority should be given to training programs, access to technology, integrated pest management, and soil health management (Wang et al., 2020; Miner et al., 2020). Collaboration with agricultural research institutions can facilitate the development and dissemination of improved practices, benefiting smallholders (Mango et al., 2017).
4.1.4 Fertilizer use and micro nutrients
Oil palms require substantial macronutrients and micronutrients to achieve optimal growth and yield, making agrochemical-based fertilizers a key component of plantation management (Viégas et al., 2021). As OP plantations continue to expand, fertilizer demand is expected to increase proportionally (Viégas et al., 2018). While chemical fertilizers are effective in boosting yields, they also come with drawbacks, such as higher production costs and environmental concerns, including soil degradation and microbial imbalance (Salamat et al., 2019). Therefore, adopting effective fertilizer management strategies is crucial to improving nutrient use efficiency while minimizing ecological harm (Ashraf et al., 2017). In smallholder OP plantations, nutrient deficiencies, particularly in potassium and phosphorus, frequently hinder productivity (Yap et al., 2022). To counter this challenge, integrating biofertilizers alongside reduced chemical fertilizers offers a more sustainable approach, ensuring plant growth while preserving soil microbial diversity (Rosenani et al., 2016).
Although organic fertilizers tend to be more expensive, they provide significant long-term benefits when applied correctly. For example, compost derived from OP biomass, such as EFBs and POME, serves as a cost-effective nutrient source that enhances soil fertility (Goh et al., 2020). Moreover, research suggests that compost application improves soil structure, enhances microbial activity, and strengthens long-term soil health (Siang et al., 2022). By optimizing fertilizer practices, smallholder farmers can increase yields while reducing the environmental impact associated with excessive chemical fertilizer use (Yi et al., 2019). Ultimately, a balanced fertilization strategy ensures sustainable PO production while maintaining healthy ecosystems for future cultivation.
4.1.5 Intercropping and mixed cropping
Traditionally, both industrial and smallholder OP plantations have followed a monocrop model. However, emerging practices increasingly incorporate various crops alongside OP to create diversified, mixed intercropping systems. These systems enhance land use efficiency, reduce monoculture-associated risks, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions (Rocha et al., 2020). Smallholders adopt intercropping strategies, planting food crops alongside immature OP, which aids in poverty reduction, improves household food security, and stabilizes yields (Abas et al., 2021). Diversification provides additional income during the initial years of OP cultivation and mitigates economic risks associated with relying solely on palm oil production (Dissanayake and Palihakkara, 2023).
Intercropping is recognized as a nature-based solution that optimizes land use and improves soil health. For instance, intercropping soybeans during the initial years of OP establishment provides additional income while enhancing soil organic carbon and biological activity (Oluwatobi et al., 2020). In India, intercropping OP with maize, turmeric, and pineapple increased yields and improved carbon stocks in degraded lands (Putra et al., 2012). Additionally, crops like black pepper and pineapple enhance microbial diversity, benefiting overall soil health (Oluwatobi et al., 2020). In Nigeria, smallholders maximize land use by intercropping OP with cocoyams, soybeans, and maize (Dissanayake and Palihakkara, 2023). Similarly, in Cameroon, intercropping during the juvenile phase of OP supports nutrient cycling and soil conservation (Obi et al., 2022). Planting shade-tolerant forage in OP plantations supports cattle productivity and increases FFB yields (Hutasoit et al., 2020). As OP matures, nutrient competition can affect growth, necessitating careful fertilizer management (Giam et al., 2015). Mulching enhances soil organic carbon content, particularly in intercropped OP plantations (Khasanah and Noordwijk, 2018). Overall, intercropping provides food and revenue during the maturation phase of OP and contributes to economic stability and environmental sustainability (Hutabarat et al., 2019).
4.1.6 Weed management
Weeds present a significant challenge in OP plantations, and while herbicides are commonly used, they can adversely affect soil microbial populations and essential biochemical processes (Sarathambal et al., 2015). Overuse of herbicides can destroy understory vegetation, diminishing vital ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling, water regulation, natural pest control, and pollination (MacLaren et al., 2018). Proper herbicide use is crucial for effective weed management while ensuring environmental safety (Zhao et al., 2023). Sustainable weed management practices, such as cover cropping, have emerged as viable alternatives to herbicides, effectively controlling weeds and reducing reliance on chemical inputs (Järvan et al., 2014). However, many cover crop species are heliophytic and may allow other plants to establish after canopy coverage, leading to ecological succession (Wicke et al., 2019).
Integrating livestock into OP plantations is an innovative approach to weed management, enhancing sustainability within the PO supply chain (Dubey, 2023). This integration allows for controlling understory vegetation while providing food security, ecosystem services, and habitat heterogeneity (Mathew et al., 2023). Sustainable weed management practices, such as cover cropping and ecological grazing, help smallholder farmers maintain biodiversity, reduce environmental impacts, and improve the overall sustainability of OP plantations. Studies have shown that integrating livestock can effectively manage weeds while enhancing soil health and productivity (Pattanayak et al., 2022). Additionally, using cover crops can improve soil structure and organic matter content, further contributing to the sustainability of the agricultural system (Damin et al., 2021). Despite the benefits of these practices, challenges remain, particularly regarding nutrient competition between OP and intercropped species during mature OP growth stages (Bundt et al., 2015). Careful management and monitoring are necessary to ensure that the advantages of intercropping and cover cropping do not compromise OP productivity.
4.1.7 Cattle grazing in OP plantations
Integrating cattle production within OP plantations addresses the rising beef demand due to population growth and improving living standards. The understory of over 19 million hectares of OP plantations provides valuable cattle feed, mitigating the need for additional land conversion (Azhar et al., 2021). Smallholders have increasingly adopted cattle production using OP understory as feed, with OP fronds serving as feed and cattle manure as organic fertilizer, creating a symbiotic relationship that enhances agricultural outputs and sustainability (Nobilly et al., 2022). Rotational grazing systems minimize management costs, reduce production inputs, and increase resource use efficiency. This practice helps mitigate deforestation, sequester carbon, restore topsoil, improve biodiversity, and reduce chemical fertilizer use (Aldinas et al., 2023). Intensive cattle integration can lead to an average daily weight gain of 0.8 kg per head, and semi-intensive systems can increase FFB production by over 10% while reducing inorganic fertilizer use (Tohiran et al., 2017). Additionally, cattle grazing enhances biodiversity by creating habitats and food sources for invertebrates like dung beetles, which rely on cattle dung for nourishment and reproduction (Murphy et al., 2021).
4.1.8 Reducing GHG emissions
Reducing GHG emissions in agriculture, particularly methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), is essential for meeting the Paris Agreement's targets of limiting global warming to 1.5°C or below 2°C. If agricultural emissions remain unaddressed, the pressure to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will intensify, complicating global climate mitigation efforts (Fawzy et al., 2020). The palm oil (PO) industry plays a significant role in GHG emissions due to biomass residues and palm oil mill effluent (POME), which contribute to long-term environmental challenges (Aziz and Hanafiah, 2017). Oil palm cultivation alone generates 64–225 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) per ton of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) while consuming 550–1,749 m3 of water per ton (Nasrin et al., 2019). Additionally, the application of nitrogen fertilizers in OP plantations is a major source of N2O emissions, estimated at 1,052–1,209 kg CO2eq per hectare (Kusin et al., 2015). These combined emissions highlight the urgent need for more sustainable agricultural practices to reduce environmental harm.
To transition toward a low-emission PO production system, adopting modern technologies is essential. Biomass and biogas recovery systems derived from POME offer a promising solution for generating steam and electricity while minimizing emissions (Lim and Biswas, 2019). Additionally, repurposing solid biomass residues into biofertilizers, biochar, and biofuels can enhance waste valorization, while ensuring that liquid discharges adhere to environmental regulations (Tan, 2024). Integrating renewable energy technologies, such as battery-powered electric vehicles charged by solar photovoltaic systems, can further enhance sustainability in the PO sector (Fahrudin, 2024). Moreover, research shows that biogas recovery technologies can cut GHG emissions by up to 373 kg CO2eq per ton of PO (Mondamina et al., 2020). Effective strategies, including wastewater-dispersed cooling systems and transitioning from stabilization ponds to aerated lagoons, can further improve emission reductions (Wongfaed et al., 2021). Ultimately, by embracing advanced technologies, refining waste management systems, and integrating renewable energy solutions, the PO industry can significantly curb its environmental impact while contributing to global climate mitigation goals.
4.1.9 Certification schemes
Certification schemes, such as the RSPO, have played a crucial role in promoting sustainable PO production since 2004, with approximately 20% of global PO certified as sustainable by 2015 (Morgans et al., 2018). However, despite growing recognition of the importance of sustainability, uptake among smallholders remains low due to socio-economic barriers, including limited access to information and support necessary for certification (Rizal and Nordin, 2022). Addressing these challenges is essential, as certification offers significant social, environmental, and economic benefits, including mitigating deforestation, improving rural livelihoods, and integrating smallholders into ethical supply chains (Chiriacò et al., 2022). Nonetheless, the financial burden of certification is a considerable obstacle for independent farmers, with RSPO certification costs exceeding USD 9,630 in some cases (Abdullah et al., 2022). Additionally, concerns regarding certification integrity, such as the potential allowance of forest clearance, have raised questions about its effectiveness in achieving sustainability goals (Noor et al., 2017). Research suggests that certification can significantly reduce deforestation, reinforcing its value in conservation efforts (Rizal et al., 2021). To enhance accessibility and effectiveness, targeted interventions, including capacity building, financial assistance, and improved information dissemination, are crucial for overcoming smallholder barriers and maximizing sustainability outcomes (Abidin et al., 2024).
4.1.10 Framework for sustainable PO production
The framework for sustainable PO production (Figure 4) addresses land degradation caused by forest conversion to agriculture, resulting in significant losses of environmental services and adversely impacting tropical landscapes and ecosystems. The expansion of OP plantations can compromise food and livelihood security for rural and indigenous communities, especially when land is taken without adequate consultation or compensation. To foster sustainability, upholding ecological integrity, rationalizing land allocation, and adopting effective management practices is crucial. This includes using high-yield, disease-resistant cultivars, implementing zero-waste milling technologies, and establishing plantations on suitable land without further deforestation.
Figure 4
The proposed framework provides pathways for smallholders to produce PO while minimizing negative impacts on people and the environment. Smallholders are encouraged to avoid deforestation of HCS and HCV lands, abstain from slash-and-burn practices, and avoid employing forced labor. In return, they may receive benefits such as carbon credits, training, agricultural inputs, and financing. Diversified, mixed OP systems can improve land use efficiency, mitigate risks for farmers, and reduce GHG emissions per unit of product. Additionally, cultivation residues can be repurposed as animal feed or processed into organic fertilizers, contributing to soil reconditioning. Integrating cattle into plantation management can control undergrowth, enhance biodiversity, optimize land use efficiency, diversify income, and reduce weeding costs.
4.2 Managing waste from PO production
Managing waste from PO production is a critical aspect of enhancing the sustainability of the industry. PO production generates substantial amounts of biomass residues and POME, which, if not properly managed, can have significant environmental impacts. Efficient waste management practices are essential to mitigate these effects, reduce GHG emissions, and convert waste into valuable resources such as biofertilizers, bioenergy, and biomaterials. By adopting innovative and sustainable waste management strategies, the PO industry can minimize its ecological footprint, promote circular economy principles, and contribute to broader environmental and socio-economic goals. This section explores various waste management techniques, their potential benefits for sustainable PO production, and presents a framework for managing waste from PO production.
4.2.1 Palm oil mill effluent (POME)
POME, a by-product of palm oil production, is generated at approximately 2.5 to 3 times the volume of extracted oil and contains high concentrations of organic pollutants, including 2% oil, 2–4% suspended solids, and 94–96% water, along with notable levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium. Due to its chemical oxygen demand (COD) of up to 51,000 mg/L and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) reaching 25,000 mg/L, POME poses serious environmental challenges, particularly for aquatic ecosystems, where it can lead to pollution and eutrophication (Nwaneri et al., 2022). Given its potential to degrade water quality, effective POME management strategies are essential for mitigating environmental harm, reducing GHG emissions, and preventing the acidification of terrestrial and aquatic systems (Finalis et al., 2023). To address these concerns, several innovative treatment methods have been explored, with anaerobic digestion emerging as a promising approach to convert POME's high organic content into renewable energy sources such as biogas, thereby reducing waste accumulation while supporting energy production (Prasetyani, 2024). Additionally, biological treatments using microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, have demonstrated effectiveness in lowering POME's organic load (Bala et al., 2014). Beyond waste reduction, treated POME can serve as a nutrient-rich liquid fertilizer, promoting agricultural productivity while increasing FFB yields by approximately 13% (Heriyanti et al., 2024). By integrating advanced treatment technologies and repurposing POME as a valuable resource, the PO industry can significantly reduce its environmental footprint and contribute to a more sustainable circular economy (Hidayatullah, 2024).
4.2.2 Empty fruit bunches (EFBs)
EFBs, a major by-product of palm oil (PO) production, are often discarded as waste, yet improper management can lead to GHG emissions. Therefore, adopting effective EFB management strategies is crucial for improving sustainability in the PO sector. Since EFBs are rich in essential nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium, they serve as valuable organic fertilizers that enhance soil properties, improve moisture retention, and suppress weed growth, ultimately leading to higher crop yields and better soil health (Supriatna et al., 2022). Furthermore, integrating EFBs into composting processes with POME produces high-quality compost, which strengthens soil structure and nutrient availability while reducing reliance on chemical fertilizers (Tang et al., 2023). Beyond their role in fertilization, EFBs possess a high calorific value, making them suitable for bioenergy production through combustion, gasification, and pyrolysis, methods that simultaneously generate renewable energy and curb GHG emissions (Wibowo et al., 2024). Additionally, EFBs can be converted into biochar, further enhancing soil fertility while facilitating carbon sequestration, a process that supports climate change mitigation efforts (Anyaoha et al., 2018a). To advance sustainable waste management, innovative recycling technologies such as gasification and composting offer environmentally friendly solutions, with integrated biological treatment and advanced filtration systems proving more efficient than conventional disposal methods (Hwang et al., 2022). By adopting these circular economy approaches, the PO industry can minimize its ecological footprint, improve agricultural productivity, and expand renewable energy solutions, thereby contributing to broader sustainability goals (Januari and Agustina, 2022).
4.2.3 Oil palm fronds (OPFs)
OPFs, an underutilized by-product of oil palm cultivation, yield approximately 11 tons per hectare and offer significant opportunities for sustainable management and resource recovery. One promising approach is gasification, which converts OPFs into high-value gaseous fuels or syngas, contributing to renewable energy production (Sulaiman et al., 2014). Additionally, recycling pruned OPFs can enhance soil fertility and nutrient cycling in mature plantations, improving soil health and overall productivity (Dislich et al., 2016). Given their composition approximately 70% fiber and 22% soluble carbohydrates, OPFs are also well-suited for ruminant feed, with an optimal inclusion rate of 30-40% in diets for lactating dairy cows (Hanum, 2023). Beyond their role in animal nutrition, OPFs can be processed into lignin for corrosion inhibition in mild steel, used in printing paper production (Rasat et al., 2013), fermented into bioethanol (Fitria et al., 2021), converted into charcoal, composted into organic fertilizers, or applied as mulch to support soil microbial biomass and nutrient recycling (Khomphet, 2024). By adopting effective OPF management strategies, the PO industry can enhance soil health, minimize waste, and lower GHG emissions, ultimately reinforcing environmental stewardship and advancing circular economy principles for long-term sustainability (Vijay et al., 2016).
4.2.4 Oil palm trunks (OPTs)
Oil palm trunks (OPTs), harvested every 25–30 years for replanting, pose both challenges and opportunities for sustainable waste management in the PO industry. Composed primarily of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, OPTs offer various applications that enhance sustainability. One key use is in bioenergy production, where OPTs are converted into biomass pellets, syngas, bio-oil, and biochar, effectively reducing fossil fuel dependency and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions (Yeo et al., 2020). Additionally, they can be processed into biocomposites and construction materials like particleboard and fiberboard, which help alleviate timber demand and promote sustainable forestry practices (Dungani et al., 2018). Their high cellulose content also makes them well-suited for bioethanol production through saccharification and fermentation, offering a renewable fuel alternative (Srinophakun et al., 2020). Furthermore, composting OPTs enhances soil fertility and structure, benefiting agriculture and crop productivity, while repurposing them for oil palm weevil larvae cultivation converts waste into valuable animal feed or protein sources. Ultimately, integrating effective OPT management strategies into PO waste frameworks can strengthen sustainability, minimize waste, and advance environmental stewardship (Shahirah et al., 2015).
4.2.5 Renewable energy generation
The growing urgency of climate change has intensified interest in renewable energy generation from oil palm biomass (OPB), a promising coal alternative that helps mitigate GHG emissions. PO production yields valuable bioproducts, biofuels, and biopower, contributing to sustainable energy solutions. Notably, small-scale biomass gasification power plants (5 to 200 kW) utilize palm kernel shells (PKS) to supply electricity to remote areas near OP plantations, increasing energy accessibility (Yacob et al., 2021). Additionally, a PO mill processing 45 tons of FFB per hour can generate 0.95–1.52 MW of electricity, with POME-based biogas digesters producing an additional 0.93 MW (Zamri et al., 2022). Methane capture systems from POME further enhance energy output by yielding approximately 28 m3 of biogas, which translates to 25.4 to 40.7 kWh per ton of FFB processed (Nuryadi et al., 2019).
By replacing fossil fuels, OPB contributes to climate change mitigation and promotes sustainability through effective PO waste management (Wu et al., 2017). Malaysia's PO industry produces approximately 168 million tons of biomass annually, consisting of solid waste such as EFB and PKS, along with liquid waste like POME, which accounts for a significant portion of processed FFB (Rahman et al., 2023; Mondamina et al., 2020). Leveraging biogas capture technologies improves PO mills' sustainability, offering renewable energy solutions (Ahmed et al., 2015). Furthermore, integrating biomass into existing coal-fired power systems lowers GHG emissions and enhances combustion efficiency, enabling a gradual transition toward more sustainable energy practices (Siregar et al., 2020).
4.2.6 Framework for managing waste from PO production
OP cultivation for FFB and PO production generates substantial solid and liquid waste throughout its lifecycle. The solid residues, collectively termed oil palm biomass (OPB), consist of trunks (OPT), fronds (OPF), empty fruit bunches (EFB), mesocarp fiber (OPMF), and palm kernel shells (PKS) (Zamri et al., 2022). Meanwhile, liquid waste primarily comprises POME, which presents environmental challenges due to its high organic load (Gay-Des-Combes et al., 2017). Notably, processing one ton of FFB yields EFB (23%), OPMF (12%), PKS (5%), and POME (60%), underscoring the volume of waste generated (Thomas and Andres, 2021). On an annual scale, each hectare of OP plantations produces approximately 21.6 tons of biomass, including EFB (20.4%), OPT (11.7%), OPF (50.3%), and additional residues (Said et al., 2022). However, improper waste disposal can lead to environmental degradation, including water pollution and nutrient leaching, emphasizing the need for sustainable waste management practices (Tang and Yap, 2020).
To reduce environmental impacts, OPB and POME are increasingly repurposed into value-added products (Yeo et al., 2020). For instance, composting OPB residues such as EFB and decanter cake (DC) facilitates nutrient recycling into organic fertilizers, thereby enhancing soil health (Zhao, 2024). Similarly, POME treatment, when integrated with bioenergy production, generates renewable energy, compost, and liquid fertilizers, aligning with zero-emission goals (Schleifer and Sun, 2018). These circular solutions not only minimize waste but also contribute to increased FFB yields, particularly through co-composting POME with EFB, which has been shown to boost plantation productivity (Zhao, 2024).
Technological innovations further expand the potential for waste valorization in the PO sector. Thermochemical processes such as gasification, pyrolysis, and torrefaction transform OPB into biochar, solid fuels, and syngas, offering scalable clean energy solutions (Khoon et al., 2019). Meanwhile, biological methods such as anaerobic digestion and fermentation generate biogas and biofuels, providing renewable energy alternatives (Carvalho et al., 2021). The development of commercially viable OPB-derived products, including biocomposites, bioplastics, and palm wine, highlights emerging opportunities for waste repurposing (Achten et al., 2010). Furthermore, biomass co-gasification and methane capture from POME anaerobic digestion exemplify strategies that enhance energy recovery and emissions reduction (Singh et al., 2010; Hamdani et al., 2023). Ultimately, integrating these innovations into a circular economy framework strengthens renewable energy systems, reduces emissions, and promotes sustainable resource utilization in the PO industry (Gyamfi, 2017), as illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5
4.3 Recommendations for achieving sustainable PO production
Promoting sustainable PO production requires a multifaceted approach that addresses practical recommendations for smallholder farmers, policy suggestions for governments and stakeholders, and strategies for implementing and adopting sustainable practices. These recommendations aim to enhance productivity, improve environmental sustainability, and support the livelihoods of smallholder farmers. By tackling the challenges and seizing opportunities within the PO sector, these guidelines seek to create a balanced, sustainable framework that benefits both producers and the environment. The following sections outline specific actions that can be taken to achieve these goals.
4.3.1 Practical recommendations for smallholder farmers
Smallholder farmers should integrate sustainable agricultural practices by adopting Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Good Management Practices (GMP), as these approaches have been shown to enhance crop yields and environmental health, while promoting a positive image of palm oil production (Abas et al., 2021). One effective strategy is intercropping and mixed cropping systems, where food crops are integrated within oil palm (OP) plantations, improving income diversification, soil health, and biodiversity (Edvanido, 2023). Additionally, optimizing fertilizer use efficiency through biofertilizers, balanced chemical fertilizers, and organic amendments like compost and treated POME plays a crucial role in enhancing nutrient uptake, increasing yields, and minimizing environmental impact (Obi et al., 2022; Palihakkara et al., 2022). To further support sustainable farming, implementing weed and pest management strategies, such as biological control agents and cover cropping systems, reduces reliance on chemical inputs, ensuring healthier plantation ecosystems (Famaye et al., 2020). Beyond agricultural improvements, OP biomass can be converted into renewable energy through gasification and pyrolysis, offering alternative energy sources while supporting effective waste management (Khasanah and Noordwijk, 2018). Furthermore, circular waste management systems that transform agricultural waste into organic fertilizers, biogas, bioethanol, and biocomposites contribute to long-term sustainability (Rocha et al., 2020). Lastly, modernizing PO milling systems through capacity enhancements, improved oil extraction rates, and advanced waste reduction techniques can significantly boost production efficiency and reduce environmental impacts, highlighting the value of updated milling equipment and targeted training programs for smallholders (Palihakkara et al., 2022).
4.3.2 Policy recommendations for government and stakeholders
Government bodies and stakeholders should prioritize financial support mechanisms, including grants, low-interest loans, and subsidies, to help smallholders access quality inputs, fertilizers, and sustainable technologies, thereby enhancing productivity and environmental sustainability (Lodhi and Shah, 2024). Additionally, expanding training and capacity-building programs focused on Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and other sustainable farming methods is essential for facilitating smallholder adaptation to environmentally responsible approaches (Senyolo et al., 2021). Strengthening certification schemes and support programs, such as RSPO certification, can further improve market access, ensuring that smallholder farmers meet sustainability standards while overcoming socio-economic challenges (Yanita and Ningsih, 2021). Moreover, targeted investment in rural infrastructure, including roads, transportation networks, and storage facilities, plays a critical role in enhancing market connectivity and reducing post-harvest losses, ultimately bolstering the economic viability of smallholder farming (Lodhi and Shah, 2024).
4.3.3 Strategies for implementation and adoption of sustainable practices
Facilitating collaborations among smallholders, agricultural research institutions, NGOs, and private sector stakeholders is essential for effectively disseminating sustainable farming practices, ensuring mutual benefits across sectors (Velten et al., 2021). Equally important, providing incentives such as carbon credits, tax breaks, and premium prices for sustainably produced goods encourages smallholders to adopt environmentally responsible practices while fostering a more supportive agricultural landscape (Amuda and Parveen, 2024). Additionally, establishing robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks plays a critical role in tracking the progress and impact of sustainable initiatives, enabling continuous improvement and adaptability (Horan, 2019). To further support adoption, public awareness campaigns should focus on educating smallholders and consumers about the economic and environmental advantages of sustainable palm oil production, ultimately driving market demand for sustainable practices and products (Dragomir and Foriş, 2022).
Figure 6 presents a flowchart that illustrates the key recommendations for promoting sustainable PO production. It highlights practical actions for smallholder farmers, policy suggestions for governments and stakeholders, and strategies for implementing and adopting sustainable practices. This visual representation aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the proposed recommendations.
Figure 6
4.3.4 Recommendations for further research
The limitations identified in the current study open several avenues for further investigation, which can significantly enhance the robustness and applicability of future research on sustainable palm oil production. Future research should expand on the preliminary inferential analyses by employing more advanced statistical techniques, such as multivariate regression, ANOVA, or structural equation modeling, to rigorously test specific hypotheses and uncover causal linkages between farming practices, socio-economic variables, and sustainability outcomes. This approach would generate more generalizable findings across different smallholder contexts.
In addition, further studies should adopt a more robust mixed-methods design to strengthen the empirical foundation. Integrating surveys with in-depth interviews, focus groups, and participatory observation can serve to verify and enrich the quantitative data. A multi-source triangulation strategy would enhance the credibility and depth of insights by effectively integrating qualitative narratives with quantitative trends.
Moreover, addressing the study's limited gender representation and lack of institutional analysis is crucial. Future investigations should design survey instruments and qualitative protocols specifically to capture gendered differences in access to resources, decision-making, and labor distribution. Examining the role of local institutions, policy environments, and extension services will provide a more nuanced understanding of how these factors influence the adoption of sustainable practices.
Finally, the conceptual frameworks developed in this study require empirical validation to confirm their practical utility. Pilot projects, case studies, or longitudinal studies that track the implementation of proposed sustainable practices and waste management strategies among smallholder farmers would not only validate these models but also allow for their iterative refinement and adaptation to local conditions and challenges. By addressing these recommendations, future research can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of sustainable palm oil production, ultimately supporting evidence-based interventions and policies that benefit smallholder farmers and promote environmental sustainability.
5 Conclusion
The palm oil industry faces both challenges and opportunities in achieving sustainability. With global demand continuing to rise, it is essential to implement environmentally responsible practices that also enhance the livelihoods of smallholder farmers. Applying Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Good Management Practices (GMP) can significantly improve productivity and farmer wellbeing. Furthermore, diversified cropping systems, such as intercropping, enhance land use efficiency, soil health, and income diversification. In addition, optimizing fertilizer use and pest management strategies is crucial for maintaining soil fertility while reducing reliance on chemical inputs. Another key strategy involves repurposing oil palm biomass (OPB) for renewable energy production, which lowers greenhouse gas emissions and promotes energy independence, thus contributing to global climate change mitigation efforts.
Equally important, developing a circular waste management framework can enhance sustainability by transforming solid and liquid waste into value-added products, reducing environmental impact while maximizing resource efficiency. Strengthening certification schemes and providing targeted support for smallholder farmers is essential for encouraging widespread adoption of sustainable practices. Addressing socio-economic challenges, such as limited access to quality planting materials, financing, and training, can further enhance smallholder productivity and resilience. Ultimately, by integrating these approaches, the palm oil industry can improve its environmental performance, elevate smallholder wellbeing, and achieve long-term sustainability gains.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
LA: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Conceptualization, Formal analysis. RN: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AA: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. CM: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. BE: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This article was supported by SLOAN Foundation (https://sloan.org), HELLMAN Foundation (https://hellmanfoundation.org) and Schwab Charitables (www.schwab.com).
Acknowledgments
BE was supported by SLOAN Foundation (https://sloan.org) and HELLMAN Foundation (https://hellmanfoundation.org) as a Fellow. We acknowledge funding from Schwab Charitables (www.schwab.com).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbasA.ErA.TambiN.YusoffN. (2021). A systematic review on sustainable agricultural practices among oil palm farmers. Outlook Agric.51, 155–163. 10.1177/00307270211021875
2
AbdullahM.ShahimiS.ArifinA. (2022). Independent smallholders' perceptions towards MSPO certification in Sabah, Malaysia. J. Trop. Forest Managem.28, 241–253. 10.7226/jtfm.28.3.241
3
AbidinM. N.FatahF. A.NoorW. N. W. M.ArisN. F. M. (2024). “A review on adoption of the Malaysian sustainable palm oil (MSPO) certification scheme,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1397 (IOP Publishing Ltd), 012035. 10.1088/1755-1315/1397/1/012035
4
AchtenW.VandenbemptP.AlmeidaJ.MathijsE.MuysB. (2010). Life cycle assessment of a palm oil system with simultaneous production of biodiesel and cooking oil in Cameroon. Environ. Sci. Technol.44, 4809–4815. 10.1021/es100067p
5
AcobtaA. N.AyompeL. M.WandumL. M.TambasiE. E.MuyukaD. S.EgohB. N. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions along the value chain in palm oil producing systems: A case study of Cameroon. Cleaner Circ. Bioecon.6:100057. 10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100057
6
AhmedY.YaakobZ.AkhtarP.SopianK. (2015). Production of biogas and performance evaluation of existing treatment processes in palm oil mill effluent (POME). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.42, 1260–1278. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.073
7
AldinasD.PrabowoR.BuchoriD.SahariB. (2023). “Diversity of hymenoptera parasitoid wasp in oil palm with the presence and absence of non crop vegetation,” in IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1220 (IOP Publishing Ltd), 012015. 10.1088/1755-1315/1220/1/012015
8
Al-KhudhairyS. G.HowellsT. R.Bin SailimA.McCleanC. J.SeniorM. J. M.AzmiR.et al. (2023). Sustainable management practices do not reduce oil palm yields on smallholder farms on Borneo. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst.47, 3–24. 10.1080/21683565.2022.2131691
9
AmudaY.ParveenR. (2024). Public-private partnerships in driving sustainable agricultural growth for addressing poverty and food insecurity in Nigeria. J. Ecohumanism3, 3228–3240. 10.62754/joe.v3i4.3841
10
AnyaohaK.SakrabaniR.PatchigollaK.MouazenA. (2018a). Critical evaluation of oil palm fresh fruit bunch solid wastes as soil amendments: prospects and challenges. Resour. Conservat. Recycl.136, 399–409. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.022
11
AnyaohaK.ZhangL. (2022). Technology-based comparative life cycle assessment for palm oil industry: the case of Nigeria. Environm. Dev. Sustainab.25, 4575–4595. 10.1007/s10668-022-02215-8
12
AnyaohaK. E.SakrabaniR.PatchigollaK.MouazenA. M. (2018b). Evaluating oil palm fresh fruit bunch processing in Nigeria. Waste Managem. Res.36, 236–246. 10.1177/0734242X17751848
13
ApriyantoM.AzharA.FikriK.PuspitasariF. (2022). The legality of cultivated palm oil, research on the readiness of small holder farmers in Indonesia to produce sustainable palm oil (ISPO) is reviewed. Int. J. Busin. Law Educ.3, 76–81. 10.56442/ijble.v3i2.56
14
AriescaR.SauA.AdinugrohoW.SetiawanA.AhamedT.NoguchiR. (2023). Land swap option for sustainable production of oil palm plantations in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Sustainability15:2394. 10.3390/su15032394
15
AshrafA.ZulkeflyS.AdekunleS.SamadM. (2017). Growth and biomass yield of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) seedlings as influenced by different rates of vermicompost. Eur. J. Eng. Technol. Res.2, 17. 10.24018/ejers.2017.2.8.405
16
AtikU.RokhimR.RusdayantiN. (2020). Social intervention in improving smallholders welfare in realizing eco-friendly palm oil plantations. E3s Web of Conf.211:05007. 10.1051/e3sconf/202021105007
17
AyompeL.NkonghoR.MassoC.EgohB. (2021). Does investment in palm oil trade alleviate smallholders from poverty in Africa? Investigating profitability from a biodiversity hotspot, Cameroon. PLoS ONE16:e0256498. 10.1371/journal.pone.0256498
18
AyompeL.NkonghoR.WandumL.OrangB.FiaboeK.TambasiE.et al. (2023). Complexities of sustainable palm oil production by smallholders in sub-Saharan Africa. Sustain. Dev.32, 529–541. 10.1002/sd.2674
19
AzharB.TohiranK.NobillyF.ZulkifliR.SyakirM.IshakZ.et al. (2021). Time to revisit oil palm-livestock integration in the wake of united nations sustainable development goals (SDGs). Front. Sustain. Food Syst.5:640285. 10.3389/fsufs.2021.640285
20
AzizN.HanafiahM. (2017). The potential of palm oil mill effluent (pome) as a renewable energy source. Acta Scientifica Malaysia1, 09–11. 10.26480/asm.02.2017.09.11
21
BalaJ.LalungJ.IsmailN. (2014). Studies on the reduction of organic load from palm oil mill effluent (pome) by bacterial strains. Int. J. Recycl. Organic Waste Agricult.4, 1–10. 10.1007/s40093-014-0079-6
22
BiengM.Delgado-RodríguezD.Vílchez-MendozaS.López-SampsonA.GarcíaE.SepúlvedaN.et al. (2022). Tree diversity in a tropical agricultural-forest mosaic landscape in honduras. Sci. Rep.12:18544. 10.1038/s41598-022-21280-7
23
BundtA.AvilaL.PivettaA.AgostinettoD.DickD.BurauelP. (2015). Imidazolinone degradation in soil in response to application history. Planta Daninha33, 341–349. 10.1590/0100-83582015000200020
24
CarvalhoC.IwamaA.RovereE. (2021). Scenarios for oil palm expansion in degraded and deforested lands in the Brazilian Amazon to meet biodiesel demand. Sustainab. Debate12, 90–107. 10.18472/SustDeb.v12n2.2021.35201
25
ChalilD.BarusR. (2020). Is certification an effective tool to improve smallholdings' performance?E3s Web of Conf.211:05004. 10.1051/e3sconf/202021105004
26
ChiriacòM.BellottaM.JusicJ. (2022). Palm oil's contribution to the united nations sustainable development goals: outcomes of a review of socio-economic aspects. Environm. Res. Letters17:063007. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6e77
27
CousinsB. (2012). Smallholder irrigation schemes, agrarian reform and ‘accumulation from above and from below' in South Africa. J. Agrarian Change13, 116–139. 10.1111/joac.12000
28
DaminV.CarrijoB.CostaN. (2021). Residual activity of sulfentrazone and its impacts on microbial activity and biomass of Brazilian savanna soils. Pesquisa Agropecuária Trop. 51. 10.1590/1983-40632021v5168340
29
DavisS. (2024). Cropland can support high bird diversity in heterogeneous rural tropical landscapes. Bird Conserv. Int.34:30. 10.1017/S0959270924000030
30
DecaënsT.MartinsM.FeijooA.OszwaldJ.DolédecS.MathieuJ.et al. (2018). Biodiversity loss along a gradient of deforestation in Amazonian agricultural landscapes. Conservat. Biol.32, 1380–1391. 10.1111/cobi.13206
31
DislichC.KeyelA.SaleckerJ.KiselY.MeyerK.AuliyaM.et al. (2016). A review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system. Biol. Rev.92, 1539–1569. 10.1111/brv.12295
32
DissanayakeS.PalihakkaraI. (2023). Effects of intercropping of immature oil palm (elaeis guineensis) with banana, ginger, and turmeric in the Galle District, Sri Lanka. Environm. Qual. Managem.33, 31–36. 10.1002/tqem.21980
33
DragomirC.ForişT. (2022). The collaborative approach to sustainability: a model of commissioning system intervention in supporting multi-stakeholder partnerships from national to global levels. Sustainability14:1536. 10.3390/su14031536
34
DubeyS. (2023). Impact of herbicides on yield of direct-seeded rice and microbial population in soil. Current J. Appl. Sci. Technol.42, 36–41. 10.9734/cjast/2023/v42i384250
35
DunganiR.AditiawatiP.ApriliaS.YuniartiK.SuwandhiI.SumardiI. (2018). “Biomaterial from oil palm waste: properties, characterization and applications,” in Palm Oil, ed. V. Y. Waisundara (London: InTech). 10.5772/intechopen.72350
36
EdvanidoH. (2023). Agronomic assessment of three spice plants as understorey crops in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis jacq.) plantation. Indones. J. Agron.51, 281–288. 10.24831/ija.v51i2.47351
37
ElsenP.KrishnamurthyR.WilcoveD. (2018). Conserving Himalayan birds in highly seasonal forested and agricultural landscapes. Conservat. Biol.32, 1313–1324. 10.1111/cobi.13145
38
ErA.NorR.RostamK. (2011). Palm oil milling wastes and sustainable development. Am. J. Appl. Sci.8, 436–440. 10.3844/ajassp.2011.436.440
39
ErniwatiE.ZuhudE.AnasI.SunkarA.SantosaY. (2017). Independent smallholder oil palm expansion and its impact on deforestation: case study in Kampar district, Riau province, Indonesia. J. Trop. Forest Managem.23, 119–127. 10.7226/jtfm.23.3.119
40
EulerM.SchwarzeS.SiregarH.QaimM. (2016). Oil palm expansion among smallholder farmers in sumatra, indonesia. J. Agricult. Econ.67, 658–676. 10.1111/1477-9552.12163
41
EwelikeN.OrjiJ.AdiezeI.OgwudireV.UzohoB.UkaomaA. (2021). Effect of palm oil mill effluent on the growth of maize (zea mays). Indian J. Agricult. Res. 55, 761–764. 10.18805/IJARe.A-628
42
FahrudinA. (2024). Utilization of biomethane to support energy security in Indonesia, Riau province: a case study. Eur. J. Busin. Managem. Res.9, 99–106. 10.24018/ejbmr.2024.9.2.2281
43
FamayeA.AdeosunS.AyegboyinK.AdejobiK.AkanbiO.OkunadeA. (2020). Evaluation of weed incidence and biomass in coffee intercropped with oil palm in avenue and hollow square arrangement in Nigeria. Am. J. Plant Sci.11, 276–284. 10.4236/ajps.2020.112021
44
FatmasariR.DarmaR.SalmanD.MusaY. (2018). Landscape ecological changes and livelihood dilemma of the rural household around the oil palm plantation. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inform. Technol.8, 2702–2708. 10.18517/ijaseit.8.6.7257
45
FawzyS.OsmanA.DoranJ.RooneyD. (2020). Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett.18, 2069–2094. 10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w
46
FelicianoD. (2019). A review on the contribution of crop diversification to sustainable development goal 1 “no poverty” in different world regions. Sustain. Dev.27, 795–808. 10.1002/sd.1923
47
FinalisE.PrasetyoJ.MurtiG.MurtiS.AdeliaN. (2023). Study on assessment and feasibility of hythane from pome to improve power plant performance. Majalah Ilmiah Pengkajian Industri16, 24–29. 10.29122/mipi.v16i1.5260
48
FitriaD.PutraI.TambunanD.SusantiM. (2021). Training the utilization of palm oil waste supporting village community economy. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Managem.2, 1234–1248. 10.46729/ijstm.v2i4.266
49
FolefackA. J. J.NjikiM. G. N.DarrD. (2019). Safeguarding forests from smallholder oil palm expansion by more intensive production? The case of Ngwei forest (Cameroon). Forest Policy Econ.101, 45–61. 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.016
50
Gay-Des-CombesJ.CarrilloC.RobroekB.JasseyV.MillsR.ArifM.et al. (2017). Tropical soils degraded by slash-and-burn cultivation can be recultivated when amended with ashes and compost. Ecol. Evol.7, 5378–5388. 10.1002/ece3.3104
51
GiamX.ManiL.KohL.TanH. (2015). Saving tropical forests by knowing what we consume. Conservat. Letters9, 267–274. 10.1111/conl.12209
52
GohY.ZoqrattM.GohY.AyubQ.TingA. (2020). Determining soil microbial communities and their influence on ganoderma disease incidences in oil palm (elaeis guineensis) via high-throughput sequencing. Biology9:424. 10.3390/biology9120424
53
GuillaumeT.KotowskaM.HertelD.KnohlA.KrashevskaV.MurtilaksonoK.et al. (2018). Carbon costs and benefits of indonesian rainforest conversion to plantations. Nat. Commun.9:1. 10.1038/s41467-018-04755-y
54
GyamfiI. (2017). Assessing environmental and social impacts of the oil palm industry in Ghana: a project synthesis. Afr. J. Agric. Res.12, 632–641. 10.5897/AJAR2016.11845
55
HamdaniI.MardianaS.HasibuanS. (2023). Aerobic-anaerobic composting in oil palm factory with bunker system. Emirat. J. Food Agricult. 35, 70–77. 10.9755/ejfa.2023.v35.i1.2993
56
HamidA. (2023). Cross-sectional study on land and seed of oil palm smallholders in the western part of Aceh: challenge for sustainability agenda. Bio Web Conf.80:03006. 10.1051/bioconf/20238003006
57
HanumC. (2023). “The potential of oil palm plantation byproducts as feed for beef cattle,” in IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1286 (IOP Publishing Ltd), 012035. 10.1088/1755-1315/1286/1/012035
58
HarizH.ZaidiS.LuthfiA.BukhariN.SajabM.MarkomM.et al. (2023). Succinic acid production from oil palm biomass: a prospective plastic pollution solution. Fermentation9, 46. 10.3390/fermentation9010046
59
HatfieldJ.BarlowJ.JolyC.LeesA.ParrucoC.TobiasJ.et al. (2019). Mediation of area and edge effects in forest fragments by adjacent land use. Conservat. Biol.34, 395–404. 10.1111/cobi.13390
60
HerdiansyahH. (2024). Conflict mitigation strategies for sustainable agriculture in palm oil expansion. Int. J.Sustain. Dev. Plann.19:190527. 10.18280/ijsdp.190527
61
HeriyantiC. A.PertiwiningrumA.HidayatullahI.GozanM. (2024). Simulating biogas production process from palm oil mill effluent for power generation. E3s Web of Conf.503:04002. 10.1051/e3sconf/202450304002
62
HidayatullahI. (2024). “Transformation of palm oil mill effluent: simulating high-purity biogas production process for power generation,” in IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 012001. 10.1088/1755-1315/1354/1/012001
63
HongW. (2024). “Advances in sustainable palm oil milling technologies: enhancing efficiency and environmental performance,” in Palm Oil, ed. V. Y. Waisundara (London: InTech). 10.5772/intechopen.113910
64
HoranD. (2019). A new approach to partnerships for SDG transformations. Sustainability11, 4947. 10.3390/su11184947
65
HoyleD.LevangP. (2012). Oil Palm Development in Cameroon. An Adhoc Working Paper, Yaounde, WWF, IRD and CIFOR, 16. Available online at: https://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/palmoildevelopmentcameroon_english.pdf
66
HutabaratS.SlingerlandM.DriesL. (2019). Explaining the “certification gap” for different types of oil palm smallholders in Riau province, Indonesia. J. Environm. Dev.28, 253–281. 10.1177/1070496519854505
67
HutasoitR.RosartioR.ElisierS.SiraitJ.SyawalH. (2020). A Shade Tolerant Forage, Stenotaphrum secundatum, in the Oil Palm Plantation to Support Cattle Productivity. Wartazoa30, 51–60. 10.14334/wartazoa.v30i1.2489
68
HwangJ.AndiappanV.NgD. (2022). “Promoting circular economy between palm oil sector with multiple industries,” in IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 1257 (Bristol: IOP Publishing Ltd), 012005. 10.1088/1757-899x/1257/1/012005
69
JanuariA.AgustinaH. (2022). “Palm oil empty fruit bunches and the implementation of zero waste and renewable energy technologies,” in IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 012004.
70
JärvanM.EdesiL.AdamsonA.VõsaT. (2014). Soil microbial communities and dehydrogenase activity depending on farming systems. Plant Soil Environm.60, 459–463. 10.17221/410/2014-PSE
71
KadirR.MohammadM.ZulkifliS. (2021). Impact of forest fragment on bird community at the bukit kuantan rubber forest plantation. E3s Web of Conf.305:05004. 10.1051/e3sconf/202130505004
72
KhasanahN.NoordwijkM. (2018). Subsidence and carbon dioxide emissions in a smallholder peatland mosaic in Sumatra, Indonesia. Mitigat. Adaptat. Strat. Global Change24, 147–163. 10.1007/s11027-018-9803-2
73
KhatibB.ŠišákL. (2014). Productivity of palm oil extraction technology in Cameroon. Agricultura Tropica Et Subtropica47, 49–59. 10.2478/ats-2014-0007
74
KhomphetT. (2024). Utilization of graphene as an alternative sustainable amendment in improving soil health through accelerated decomposition of oil palm mulch and enhanced nutrient availability. Front. Agron.6:1383613. 10.3389/fagro.2024.1383613
75
KhoonK.RumpangE.KamarudinN.HarunM. H. (2019). Quantifying total carbon stock of mature oil palm. J. Oil Palm Res. 31, 521–527. 10.21894/jopr.2019.0044
76
KomeG.TabiF. (2020). Towards sustainable oil palm plantation management: effects of plantation age and soil parent material. Agricult. Sci.11, 54–70. 10.4236/as.2020.111004
77
KrishnaV.EulerM.SiregarH.QaimM. (2017). Differential livelihood impacts of oil palm expansion in Indonesia. Agricult. Econ.48, 639–653. 10.1111/agec.12363
78
KusinF.AkhirN.Mohamat-YusuffF.AwangM. (2015). The impact of nitrogen fertilizer use on greenhouse gas emissions in an oil palm plantation associated with land use change. Atmósfera28, 243–250. 10.20937/ATM.2015.28.04.03
79
LeeJ.AboodS.GhazoulJ.BarusB.ObidzinskiK.KohL. (2013). Environmental impacts of large-scale oil palm enterprises exceed that of smallholdings in Indonesia. Conservat. Letters7, 25–33. 10.1111/conl.12039
80
LimC.BiswasW. (2019). Sustainability implications of the incorporation of a biogas trapping system into a conventional crude palm oil supply chain. Sustainability11:792. 10.3390/su11030792
81
LintemaniM.LossA.MendesC.FantiniA. (2019). Long fallows allow soil regeneration in slash-and-burn agriculture. J. Sci. Food Agric.100, 1142–1154. 10.1002/jsfa.10123
82
LodhiY.ShahA. (2024). Review on public private partnership in agriculture supply chain: a step towards sustainable agriculture supply chain. Int. J. Agricult. Extens. Social Dev.7, 258–260. 10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i1d.218
83
LouisV. (2024). Tiger habitat quality modelling in Malaysia with sentinel-2 and InVest. Remote Sens.16:284. 10.3390/rs16020284
84
MacLarenC.StorkeyJ.StraußJ.SwanepoelP.Dehnen-SchmutzK. (2018). Livestock in diverse cropping systems improve weed management and sustain yields whilst reducing inputs. J. Appl. Ecol.56, 144–156. 10.1111/1365-2664.13239
85
MangoN.MakateC.LundyM.SizibaS.NyikahadzoiK.FatunbiA. (2017). Collective market participation for improved income among smallholder farming households: a case of Balaka innovation platform in Malawi. Afr. Crop Sci. J.25, 97. 10.4314/acsj.v25i1.8S
86
Martinez-RamosM.PingarroniA.Rodríguez-VelázquezJ.Toledo-ChelalaL.Zermeño-HernándezI.BongersF. (2016). Natural forest regeneration and ecological restoration in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica48, 745–757. 10.1111/btp.12382
87
MasyithohG.NurjannahS. (2024). “History of origin status and land use of oil palm plantations in west Kalimantan province,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1407 (Bristol: IOP Publishing Ltd), 012006. 10.1088/1755-1315/1407/1/012006
88
MathewA.PrabukumarG.SenthiveluM.GnanachitraM.PrasadV. (2023). Impact of pre and post emergence herbicide application on soil microbial population assessment in direct wet seeded rice. Int. J. Environm. Climate Change13, 1739–1747. 10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i92405
89
MinerG.DelgadoJ.IppolitoJ.StewartC. (2020). Soil health management practices and crop productivity. Agricult. Environm. Letters5:20023. 10.1002/ael2.20023
90
MondaminaN.RachmatD.LaksonoM. (2020). Alternative scenarios to utilise excess biogas in palm oil mill. Indones. J. Environm. Managem. Sustainab.4:2. 10.26554/ijems.2020.4.2.48-54
91
MorgansC.MeijaardE.SantikaT.LawE.BudihartaS.AncrenazM.et al. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of palm oil certification in delivering multiple sustainability objectives. Environm. Res. Letters13:064032. 10.1088/1748-9326/aac6f4
92
MurphyD.GogginK.PatersonR. (2021). Oil palm in the 2020s and beyond: challenges and solutions. Cabi Agricult. Biosci.2:1. 10.1186/s43170-021-00058-3
93
NagiahC.AzmiR. (2012). Untitled. J. Oil Palm Environm.3, 114–120. 10.5366/jope.2012.12
94
NaiduaT.QadirD.NasirR.MannanH.MukhtarH.MaqsoodK.et al. (2021). Utilization of moringa oleifera and nanofiltration membrane to treat palm oil mill effluent (POME). Materwiss. Werksttech.52, 346–356. 10.1002/mawe.202000084
95
NasrinA.LohS.SukiranM.BukhariN.AzizA. (2019). Technical assessment and flue gases emission monitoring of an oil palm biomass–biogas cofired boiler. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy38:13189. 10.1002/ep.13189
96
NchanjiY.NkonghoR.MalaW.LevangP. (2015). Efficacy of oil palm intercropping by smallholders. Case study in south-west Cameroon. Agroforest. Syst.90, 509–519. 10.1007/s10457-015-9873-z
97
NchuW.KoonaP. (2020). Using oil palm segregation genetics to decipher illegitimate seed distribution channels to smallholder farmers in Cameroon. Agrotech Journal5, 52–62. 10.31327/atj.v5i1.1256
98
NdamL. M.AsongweG. A.NkonghoR. N.MbeneK.TellenV. A.NdiE. J.et al. (2024). Smallholder palm oil production sector in African countries: state of the art, practices, constraints, and opportunities in Littoral and Centre regions of Cameroon. Afr. J. Agric. Res.20, 251–271. 10.20944/preprints202307.1144.v1
99
NkonghoR.FeintrenieL.LevangP. (2014). Strengths and weaknesses of the smallholder oil palm sector in Cameroon. Ocl21:D208. 10.1051/ocl/2013043
100
NkonghoR. N.NdjoguiT. E.LevangP. (2015). History of partnership between agro-industry and oil palm smallholders in cameroon. OCL22:A301. 10.1051/ocl/2015005
101
NobillyF.AtikahS.YahyaM.JusohS.CunG.NorhishamA.et al. (2022). Rotational cattle grazing improves understory vegetation biodiversity and structural complexity in oil palm plantations. Weed Biol. Manag.22, 13–26. 10.1111/wbm.12246
102
NoorF.GassnerA.TerheggenA.DobieP. (2017). Beyond sustainability criteria and principles in palm oil production: addressing consumer concerns through insetting. Ecol. Soc.22:220205. 10.5751/ES-09172-220205
103
NtsiapaneA.SwanepoelJ.NesamvuniA.OjoT. (2023). Assessing the efficiency of smallholder wool farmers in the changing paradigms of the free state province of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci.53, 125–132. 10.4314/sajas.v53i1.14
104
NuryadiA.SusantoH.PeryogaY. (2019). Analysis on the feasibility of small-scale biogas from palm oil mill effluent (pome) – study case: palm oil mill in Riau-Indonesia. Matec Web of Conf.260:03004. 10.1051/matecconf/201926003004
105
NwaneriC.AkujobiC.OkoronduS.UmehS.OpurumC. (2022). Batch mode biomethane production from anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent (pome) with cassava peels and cabbage waste. Microbiol. Res. J. Int.32, 23–31. 10.9734/mrji/2022/v32i530387
106
ObiE.AgeleS.AiyelariO.AdejoroS.AgbonaA. (2022). Nutrient uptake and use efficiencies of strip intercropped cassava, maize and pepper as affected by fertilizer type and age of oil palm fields in an oil palm-based intercropping system. J. Soil Sci. Environm. Managem.13, 23–35. 10.5897/JSSEM2020.0818
107
OluwatobiA.OlorunmaiyeK.AdekolaO. (2020). Growth assessment of juvenile oil palm (Elaeis guineensis jacq.) intercropped with fruit vegetables in a rainforest zone of Nigeria. Acta Agric. Slov.116:889. 10.14720/aas.2020.116.2.889
108
OrdwayE. M.NaylorR. L.NkonghoR. N.LambinE. F. (2017). Oil palm expansion in Cameroon: Insights into sustainability opportunities and challenges in Africa. Glob. Environ. Change47, 190–200. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.10.009
109
PahriS.ErA.CheahW. (2023). Social issues and challenges among oil palm smallholder farmers in Malaysia: systematic literature review. Sustainability15:3123. 10.3390/su15043123
110
PalihakkaraI.RodrigoW.EkanayakeE. (2022). Growth performances of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) varieties under mature oil palm with palm oil mill effluent as growing media. Sri Lankan J. Agricult. Ecosyst.4, 79–93. 10.4038/sljae.v4i2.99
111
PattanayakS.JenaS.DasP.MaitraS.ShankarT.PraharajS.et al. (2022). Weed management and crop establishment methods in rice (Oryza sativa l.) influence the soil microbial and enzymatic activity in sub-tropical environment. Plants11:1071. 10.3390/plants11081071
112
PrasetyaniD. (2024). Two decades of palm oil business - environmental quality nexus: a bibliometric approach. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy14, 290–300. 10.32479/ijeep.15186
113
PutraE.SimatupangA.SupriyantaS.IndradewaD. (2012). The growth of one year-old oil palms intercropped with soybean and groundnut. J. Agricult. Sci.4:169. 10.5539/jas.v4n5p169
114
PutriM.SantosaY.Masy'udB. (2021). Does the change in land cover alters birds and butterflies diversity?Int. J. Oil Palm4, 8–21. 10.35876/ijop.v4i1.55
115
RahmanM.YusupS.ChinB.ShariffI.QuitainA. (2023). Oil palm wastes co-firing in an opposed firing 500 mw utility boiler: a numerical analysis. CFD Letters15, 139–152. 10.37934/cfdl.15.3.139152
116
RamlahS. (2024). “Prospect of the high conservation value areas as tourisms destination in the oil palm plantation, Pasangkayu Regency, west Sulawesi, Indonesia,” in IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1366 (Bristol: IOP Publishing Ltd), 012025. 10.1088/1755-1315/1366/1/012025
117
RasatM.WahabR.KariZ.YunusA.MoktarJ.RamleS. (2013). Strength properties of bio-composite lumbers from lignocelluloses of oil palm fronds agricultural residues. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inform. Technol.3:199. 10.18517/ijaseit.3.3.320
118
RhebergenT.FairhurstT.WhitbreadA.GillerK. E.ZingoreS. (2018). Yield gap analysis and entry points for improving productivity on large oil palm plantations and smallholder farms in Ghana. Agric. Syst.165, 14–25. 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.05.012
119
RizalA.NordinS. (2022). Smallholders participation in sustainable certification: the mediating impact of deliberative communication and responsible leadership. Front. Psychol.13:978993. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978993
120
RizalA.NordinS.HussinS.HussinS. (2021). Beyond rational choice theory: multifaceted determinants of participation in palm oil sustainable certification amongst smallholders in Malaysia. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.5:638296. 10.3389/fsufs.2021.638296
121
RochaR.RodriguesM.LopesR.CysneA.MacedoJ. (2020). Production and cash flow of oil palm intercropping systems an Amazonian degraded area. Nativa8, 52–57. 10.31413/nativa.v8i1.8073
122
RochaR.VirtanenT.CabezaM. (2015). Bird assemblages in a Malagasy forest-agricultural frontier: effects of habitat structure and forest cover. Trop. Conserv. Sci.8, 681–710. 10.1177/194008291500800307
123
RosenaniA.RovicaR.CheahP.LimC. (2016). Growth performance and nutrient uptake of oil palm seedling in prenursery stage as influenced by oil palm waste compost in growing media. Int. J. Agron.2016, 1–8. 10.1155/2016/6930735
124
SagarH.AmaniM.RoopaR.SharminM.RichardF.ClauseJ. (2019). India in the oil palm era: describing India's dependence on palm oil, recommendations for sustainable production, and opportunities to become an influential consumer. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 12. 10.1177/1940082919838918
125
SaidF.HamidN.RazaliM.DaudN. (2022). “Lignocellulosic of oil palm biomass to chemical product via fermentation,” in Elaeis Guineensis, ed. H. Kamyab (London: InTech). 10.5772/intechopen.99312
126
SaifullahM.KariF.OthmanA. (2018). Poverty among the small-scale plantation holders. Int. J. Soc. Econ.45, 230–245. 10.1108/IJSE-10-2016-0296
127
SalamatS.HassanM.ShiraiY.HanifA.ArifinI.NorizanM. (2019). Application of compost in mixed media improved oil palm nursery's secondary root structure thereby reducing the fertilizer requirement for growth. Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol.27, 39–49. 10.35118/apjmbb.2019.027.3.05
128
SapalinaF.FarrasatiR.WiratmokoD.RahutomoS.SantosoH.GintingE. N.et al. (2022). Oil palm intercropping system: a potential nature-based solution to improve soil biology activities in North Sumatra plantation, Indonesia. Malays. J. Microbiol.18, 235–241. 10.21161/mjm.211275
129
SarathambalC.SinghV.BarmanK. (2015). Soil microbial communities and enzymes as affected by herbicides of rice-wheat and soybean- wheat cropping system. J. Appl. Nat. Sci.7, 935–938. 10.31018/jans.v7i2.710
130
SarzynskiT.GiamX.CarrascoL.LeeJ. (2020). Combining radar and optical imagery to map oil palm plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia, using the google earth engine. Remote Sens.12:1220. 10.3390/rs12071220
131
SchleiferP.SunY. (2018). Emerging markets and private governance: the political economy of sustainable palm oil in china and India. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ.25, 190–214. 10.1080/09692290.2017.1418759
132
SenyoloM.LongT.OmtaO. (2021). Enhancing the adoption of climate-smart technologies using public-private partnerships: lessons from the Wema case in South Africa. Int. Food Agribusin. Managem. Rev.24, 755–776. 10.22434/IFAMR2019.0197
133
SetiajiatiF.NurrochmatD. R.van AssenB. W.PurwawangsaH. (2024). “Current status of Indonesia's palm oil products and their competitiveness in the global market,” in IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1379 (Bristol: IOP Publishing Ltd), 012022. 10.1088/1755-1315/1379/1/012022
134
ShahirahM.GimbunJ.PangS.ZakriaR.ChengC.ChuaG.et al. (2015). Influence of nutrient addition on the bioethanol yield from oil palm trunk sap fermented by saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Indust. Eng. Chem.23, 213–217. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.08.018
135
SiangC.WahidS.TehC. (2022). Standing biomass, dry-matter production, and nutrient demand of tenera oil palm. Agronomy12:426. 10.3390/agronomy12020426
136
SibhatuK. (2019). Oil palm boom and farm household diets in the tropics. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.3:75. 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00075
137
SigalinggingR. (2024). The effect of NPK fertiliser on oil palm coefficient as a baseline water management during the nursery phase. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1302:012107. 10.1088/1755-1315/1302/1/012107
138
SinghR.IbrahimM.EsaN.IliyanaM. (2010). Composting of waste from palm oil mill: a sustainable waste management practice. Rev. Environm. Sci. Bio/Technol.9, 331–344. 10.1007/s11157-010-9199-2
139
SiregarK.MachsunA.SholihatiS.AlamsyahR.IchwanaI.SiregarN.et al. (2020). Life cycle impact assessment on electricity production from biomass power plant system through life cycle assessment (LCA) method using biomass from palm oil mill in Indonesia. E3s Web Conf.188:00018. 10.1051/e3sconf/202018800018
140
SolimanT.LimF.LeeJ.CarrascoL. (2016). Closing oil palm yield gaps among Indonesian smallholders through industry schemes, pruning, weeding and improved seeds. R. Soc. Open Sci.3:160292. 10.1098/rsos.160292
141
SreekarR.MohanA.DasS.AgarwalP.RamachandranV. (2013). Natural windbreaks sustain bird diversity in a tea-dominated landscape. PLoS ONE8:e70379. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070379
142
SrinophakunP.ThanapimmethaA.SrinophakunT.ParakulsuksatidP.SakdaronnarongC.VilaipanM.et al. (2020). Techno-economic analysis for bioethanol plant with multi lignocellulosic feedstocks. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev.9, 319–328. 10.14710/ijred.9.3.319-328
143
StichnotheH.SchuchardtF. (2010). Comparison of different treatment options for palm oil production waste on a life cycle basis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assessm.15, 907–915. 10.1007/s11367-010-0223-0
144
SukiyonoK.RomdhonM.MulyasariG.YuliarsoM.NabiuM.TrisusiloA.et al. (2022). The contribution of oil palm smallholders farms to the implementation of the sustainable development goals-measurement attempt. Sustainability14:6843. 10.3390/su14116843
145
SulaimanS.RazaliN.KondaR.AtnawS.MoniM. (2014). On the diversification of feedstock in gasification of oil palm fronds. J. Mechan. Eng. Sci.6, 907–915. 10.15282/jmes.6.2014.17.0087
146
SupriatnaJ. (2024). Sustainability analysis of smallholder oil palm plantations in several provinces in Indonesia. Sustainability16:4383. 10.3390/su16114383
147
SupriatnaJ.SetiawatiM.SudirjaR.SuhermanC.BonneauX. (2022). Composting for a more sustainable palm oil waste management: a systematic literature review. Scient. World J.2022, 1–20. 10.1155/2022/5073059
148
SurosoA. I.TandraH.SyaukatY.NajibM. (2021). The issue in Indonesian palm oil stock decision making: Sustainable and risk criteria. Decision Sci. Letters10, 241–246. 10.5267/j.dsl.2021.4.001
149
SuryaningsihA. (2023). Expansion of oil palm plantations: pt agrapana wukir panca social, economic and environmental issues (case study of Pelalawan district, Riau). J. Soc. Sci.4, 184–195. 10.46799/jss.v4i1.513
150
TanQ. (2024). Toward carbon neutrality: systematic approach to decarbonize palm oil value chain. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.63, 1903–1925. 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02405
151
TangK.YapP. (2020). “A systematic review of slash-and-burn agriculture as an obstacle to future-proofing climate change,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Climate Change, 4 (Pita Kotte: TIIKM), 1–19. 10.17501/2513258x.2020.4101
152
TangY. M.TanK. T.WongL. P. (2023). Palm oil mill effluent (pome) as a source of biofuels and value-added products via oil recovery: a review. J. Oil Palm Res. 36, 534–546. 10.21894/jopr.2023.0056
153
TchindjangM.MiaroL.MboringongF.EtogaG.EricV.NgomE. (2022). “Environmental impacts of the oil palm cultivation in Cameroon,” in Elaeis Guineensis, ed. H. Kamyab (London: InTech). 10.5772/intechopen.97862
154
ThomasS.AndresC. (2021). Biomass from palm oil waste as a renewable energy source with community benefits. Int. J. Papier Adv. Scientific Rev.2, 30–36. 10.47667/ijpasr.v2i1.79
155
TohiranK.NobillyF.ZulkifliR.MaxwellT.MoslimR.AzharB. (2017). Targeted cattle grazing as an alternative to herbicides for controlling weeds in bird-friendly oil palm plantations. Agron. Sustain. Dev.37:6. 10.1007/s13593-017-0471-5
156
VeltenS.JagerN.NewigJ. (2021). Success of collaboration for sustainable agriculture: a case study meta-analysis. Environm. Dev. Sustainab.23, 14619–14641. 10.1007/s10668-021-01261-y
157
VeriasaT. (2024). Revisiting the implications of RSPO smallholder certification relative to farm productivity in Riau, Indonesia. Forest Soc.8, 123–139. 10.24259/fs.v8i1.26964
158
ViégasI.CostaM.FerreiraE.PerézN.BarataH.GalvãoJ.et al. (2021). Contribution of pueraria phaseoloides l. in the cycling of macronutrients in oil palm plantations. J. Agricult. Stud.9:1. 10.5296/jas.v9i3.18577
159
ViégasI.GalvãoJ.SantosC.SilvaD.SodréD.FreitasJ. (2018). Micronutrients content in pueraria phaseoloides l. on soils under oil palm plantations in Tailândia, state of Pará. Biosci. J. 59–66. 10.14393/BJ-v34n1a2018-36398
160
VijayV.PimmS.JenkinsC.SmithS. (2016). The impacts of oil palm on recent deforestation and biodiversity loss. PLoS ONE11:e0159668. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159668
161
WangE.HeD.ZhaoZ.SmithC.MacDonaldB. (2020). Using a systems modeling approach to improve soil management and soil quality. Front. Agricult. Sci. Eng.7, 289. 10.15302/J-FASE-2020337
162
WibowoR. P.NasutionP. N. S.NurT. B.PebriyaniD. (2024). “From waste to wealth: an economic analysis of briquette from empty fruit bunch within the circular economy framework,” in IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1413, 012111. 10.1088/1755-1315/1413/1/012111
163
WickeD.SchulzL.LentesS.ScholzP.GibhardtJ.DanielR.et al. (2019). Identification of the first glyphosate transporter by genomic adaptation. Environ. Microbiol.21, 1287–1305. 10.1111/1462-2920.14534
164
WoittiezL. S.SlingerlandM.RafikR.GillerK. E. (2018). Nutritional imbalance in smallholder oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Nutrient Cycling Agroecosyst.111, 73–86. 10.1007/s10705-018-9919-5
165
WoittiezL. S.van WijkM. T.SlingerlandM.van NoordwijkM.GillerK. E. (2017). Yield gaps in oil palm: a quantitative review of contributing factors. Eur. J. Agron. 83, 57–77. 10.1016/j.eja.2016.11.002
166
WongfaedN.KongjanP.SuksongW.PrasertsanP.O-ThongS. (2021). Strategies for recovery of imbalanced full-scale biogas reactor feeding with palm oil mill effluent. PeerJ9:e10592. 10.7717/peerj.10592
167
WuQ.QiangT.ZengG.ZhangH.HuangY.WangY. (2017). Sustainable and renewable energy from biomass wastes in palm oil industry: a case study in Malaysia. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy42, 23871–23877. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.147
168
YacobN.MohamedH.ShamsuddinA. (2021). Investigating the palm oil mill wastes properties for thermal power plants. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci.88, 1–13. 10.37934/arfmts.88.2.113
169
YanitaM.NingsihR. (2021). Social and economic characteristics of ISPO certified oil palm smallholders. E3s Web of Conf.306:02053. 10.1051/e3sconf/202130602053
170
YapC.NasrudinN.IsmailM.NulitR.IbrahimM.MustafaM.et al. (2022). Usage of biofertilizers to correct the nutrient deficiency of oil palm (elaeis guineensis): an observational study and review. Food Sci. Eng. 147–153. 10.37256/fse.3220221613
171
YeoJ.HowB.TengS.LeongW.NgW.LimC.et al. (2020). Synthesis of sustainable circular economy in palm oil industry using graph-theoretic method. Sustainability12:8081. 10.3390/su12198081
172
YiL. G.WahidS. A. A.TamilarasanP.SiangC. S. (2019). Enhancing sustainable oil palm cultivation using compost. J. Oil Palm Res. Available online at: https://jopr.mpob.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/joprv31sept2019-lai.pdf
173
ZamriM.MilanoJ.ShamsuddinA.RoslanM.SallehS.RahmanA.et al. (2022). An overview of palm oil biomass for power generation sector decarbonization in Malaysia: progress, challenges, and prospects. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Energy Environm.11:4. 10.1002/wene.437
174
ZhaoH.LiH.KongC. (2023). Penoxsulam-resistant barnyardgrass-mediated rhizosphere microbial communities affect the growth of rice. Pest Manag. Sci.79, 2664–2674. 10.1002/ps.7445
175
ZhaoQ. (2024). The expansion and remaining suitable areas of global oil palm plantations. Global Sustainab.7:8. 10.1017/sus.2024.8
Summary
Keywords
circular economy, intercropping systems, carbon credit incentives, deforestation avoidance, soil fertility enhancement, greenhouse gas mitigation
Citation
Ayompe LM, Nkongho RN, Acobta AN, Masso C and Egoh BN (2025) Transforming palm oil production: sustainable techniques and waste management strategies for Cameroon's smallholder farmers. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 9:1606323. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1606323
Received
05 April 2025
Accepted
20 June 2025
Published
16 July 2025
Volume
9 - 2025
Edited by
Annalisa Serio, University of Teramo, Italy
Reviewed by
A. Faroby Falatehan, IPB University, Indonesia
Jajang Supriatna, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Ayompe, Nkongho, Acobta, Masso and Egoh.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lacour M. Ayompe mlacour@uci.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.