Titanite Mineralization of Microbial Bioalteration Textures in Jurassic Volcanic Glass, Coast Range Ophiolite, California

Abstract

Volcanic glasses are rarely preserved in the rock record, and the quality of preservation generally declines with increasing age. Records preserved in ancient basaltic glasses therefore provide important links between processes operating in the distant past, and those that are active on the Earth today. Microbial colonization has been linked to the formation of characteristic structures in basaltic glass, including tubules and granule-filled tubules, which are thought to be produced by microbially mediated glass dissolution. Structures of similar occurrence and morphology but filled almost entirely with fine-grained titanite have been documented in some ancient metabasalts. It has been suggested that the ancient titanite-mineralized structures are mineralized equivalents of hollow tubules in modern glassy basaltic rocks, but a direct link has not been firmly established. We report the discovery of tubular bioalteration structures in fresh and minimally altered basaltic glasses of middle Jurassic (164 Ma) age from the Stonyford Volcanic Complex (SFVC), Coast Range Ophiolite, California. Tubular structures hosted in unaltered basaltic glass are typically hollow, whilst those in zones of zeolitic alteration are mineralized by titanite. Tubules are continuous across zeolite-glass interfaces, which mark an abrupt change from titanite-filled to hollow tubules, demonstrating that titanite growth occurs preferentially within pre-existing tubular structures. Titanite mineralization in the SFVC represent a link between tubular structures in modern basaltic glass and titanite-mineralized features of similar morphology and spatial distribution in ancient metabasalts. Our observations support a link between textures in modern glassy basaltic rocks and some of the oldest-known putative ichnofossils.

Introduction

The preservation of glass in ancient volcanic rocks is relatively rare, and occurs only where processes such as hydrothermal alteration, thermal metamorphism, and deformation were minimal or absent. In particular, the retardation of hydrothermal circulation by welding (to form massive glass) or cementation with calcite precipitated from seawater at low temperatures, appears to be critical to the preservation of ancient glass, as well as a tectonic setting that does not involve regional metamorphism and deformation. Thus, ancient volcanic glass is most commonly preserved in ophiolites and island arcs that are exposed by accretionary uplift of terranes formed in the upper plate of a subduction zone (e.g., Robinson et al., 1983; Shervais and Hanan, 1989; Shervais, 2001). Volcanic glass may also be preserved in oceanic settings prior to subduction, and may be sampled by drilling (Furnes et al., 1996; Fisk and McLoughlin, 2013).

Despite their rarity, ancient volcanic glasses provide important links between the past and processes that are active on the Earth today. They also preserve compositional and isotopic data documenting evidence of their magmatic and tectonic origins that may be lost during thermal or hydrothermal metamorphism. Most investigations of volcanic glass focus on the preservation of primary compositional and isotopic data (Robinson et al., 1983; Shervais and Hanan, 1989; Fisk and McLoughlin, 2013). In this paper, we present new evidence for microbial activity during the Jurassic that contributed to the alteration of basaltic glass in the SFVC (Shervais and Hanan, 1989), a remnant of the Coast Range ophiolite in northern California (Shervais et al., 2005a,b,c). The character of this activity is essentially identical to that of microbial alteration that is active today (Furnes et al., 1996; Fisk et al., 1998, 2003) and provides a link between currently observable/active processes and the past.

Geological Context for the Stonyford Volcanic Complex

The SFVC consists of sub-aqueous basalts, including both pillow lava and sheet flows, with intercalations of ribbon chert and hyaloclastite breccia (Shervais and Hanan, 1989; Shervais et al., 2005a, b). It is preserved as mega-blocks up to several km across in a serpentinite-matrix mélange that is continuous with ophiolite assemblages at Elder Creek, 35 km to the north (Hopson and Pessagno, 2005; Shervais et al., 2011). Plutonic rocks are not observed within the complex, but mélange blocks of wehrlite, gabbro, and diorite are common structurally below the complex (Shervais et al., 2004, 2005c). Volcanic rocks of the Stonyford complex comprise three suites: oceanic tholeiite, alkali basalt, and high-Al, low-Ti basalts. Each suite has distinct major and trace element characteristics that require derivation from different mantle source regions, but all three suites have isotopic compositions that require a subducted sediment component (Shervais et al., 2005c). Based on these data, and on the complete absence of any high-pressure metamorphic minerals, the complex has been interpreted to represent an oceanic seamount formed within the Coast Range ophiolite forearc in response to the collision of an active spreading center (Shervais et al., 2004, 2005c). Previous interpretations correlating the SFVC with the Franciscan assemblage (Shervais and Kimbrough, 1985; Shervais and Hanan, 1989) were incorrect. Figure 1A shows the regional context of the SFVC, and Figure 1B shows a typical hyaloclastite outcrop sampled for the present study.

FIGURE 1

Hyaloclastite breccias composed of alkali basalt glass form layers that range from ≈1 m to almost 100 m thick, but more commonly 10–50 m thick, intercalated with pillow lava. The breccias consist largely of subangular to rounded lapilli of pale brown basaltic glass (≤3 cm across) in a matrix of glass shards (≈0.1–1 mm). The basaltic glass is microphyric with sparse microphenocrysts of olivine (Fo_86–87), plagioclase (An_72–80), and Cr-spinel (Shervais and Hanan, 1989). Bombs of crystalline basalt are common in some layers but absent in others. The breccias are cemented by calcite, analcime, three compositionally distinct generations of chlorite, and (rarely) heulandite. Cementation proceeded in several stages that included incipient replacement of some glass margins by interlayered smectite-chlorite, analcime, or heulandite (Shervais and Hanan, 1989). In addition, many of the glass lapilli are cut by hairline fractures that are lined with palagonite. The secondary assemblage was interpreted by Shervais and Hanan (1989) to represent maximum temperatures of ∼100°C, based on the presence of analcime and the absence of laumontite.

Major and trace element analyses of the glass show that it is alkali basalt with K₂O ≈ 0.6–0.9 wt% and LREE-enriched patterns (chondrite-normalized), similar to other alkali basalts in the volcanic complex (Shervais and Hanan, 1989; Shervais et al., 2005c). ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar dates for hand-picked glass lapilli by Paul Renne (Shervais et al., 2005a) cluster around 164.5 ± 0.5 Ma or Bathonian on the Jurassic time scale of Palfy et al. (2000). These dates are supported by detailed radiolaria biostratigraphy, analyzed by Benita Murchey and reported in Shervais et al. (2005a), which shows that the intercalated chert horizons range in age from Bajocian or Bathonian at the base of the complex to Oxfordian near the top (≈166–155 Ma on the Jurassic timescale of Palfy et al. (2000). These ages are significantly older than those estimated previously (Tithonian, ≈150 Ma) based on poorly preserved radiolarian assemblages in hydrothermally altered chert (Pessagno, 1977).

Materials and Methods

Thin sections of SFVC hyaloclastite glass were examined in transmitted light using a Nikon Eclipse LV100 POL petrographic microscope equipped with a Nikon DS-Ri1 12 Mpixel camera. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was carried out using a Hitachi S-4300SE/N field emission SEM with Genesis EDAX EDS spectrometer at College of Arts & Sciences Microscopy, Texas Tech University, using an electron-beam accelerated to between 10 and 20 kV and a 13 mm working distance, with a 1 μm beam diameter. Additional SEM observations were performed on a JEOL JSM-6301FXV instrument at the University of Alberta connected to a Princeton Gamma Tech IMIX energy-dispersive spectrometer system. The analyses were performed at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and a working distance of 15 mm. Selected regions were also analyzed using a FE-SEM JEOL JSM-7001F field emission source scanning electron microscope at the Institute for Planetary Materials, Okayama University, with 5 nA beam current and 15 kV acceleration voltage at a working distance of 10 mm and 1 μm beam diameter.

X-ray element mapping and compositional analysis, including for light elements (C, N) were carried out with a JEOL JXA-8900R electron probe micro-analyzer (EPMA) at the University of Alberta using an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and probe current of 3.0 × 10^–8 A and a 5 μm beam diameter. Carbon and nitrogen peaks were calibrated using silicon carbide and boron nitride, respectively, and because carbon was an element of interest, thin sections were coated with a thin film of iridium measuring approximately 40 Å thick (Banerjee and Muehlenbachs, 2003). To monitor reproducibility and improve counting statistics carbon was routinely measured on two spectrometers. Instrument calibration for EPMA of elements other than C and N were performed on natural and synthetic standard materials. Additional wavelength-dispersive analysis was conducted using a JEOL JXA-8800R EPMA at the Institute for Planetary Materials, Okayama University with accelerating voltage 15 kV and a probe current of 1.2 × 10^–8 A with a 5 μm beam diameter.

Micro X-ray diffraction (μXRD) measurements were carried out using a Bruker D8 Discover microdiffractometer with a Co source (Co Kα, λ = 1.7902 Å) operating at 35 kV and 40 mA. Monocapillary optics and a 300 μm snout were used to create a collimated beam of 300 μm diameter. Diffracted X-rays were detected with a two-dimensional General Area Detector Diffraction System (GADDS). Scans were collected in “coupled” scan mode, with fixed source and detector (Flemming, 2007). Integrated diffractograms were interpreted using the International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD) Powder Diffraction File ver. 4 (ICDD PDF-4) database.

Hand-picked glass particles were cleaned of external carbonate cement, so that the analyzed carbonate is interpreted to be primarily internal to the tubule-bearing glass assemblage. Stable carbon isotope analyses were performed by pouring 100% phosphoric acid on powders under vacuum (McCrea, 1950) and analyzing the evolved CO₂ using a Finnigan MAT 252 mass spectrometer at the University of Alberta. The data are reported in the usual delta-notation with respect to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) (Craig, 1957; Coplen, 1994). Yields of CO₂ in the samples varied from 0.03 to 6% by weight. The precision of the carbon isotope analysis is ±0.03 ‰.

Results

Microtubules in Fresh Glass

Glass preservation at Stonyford is excellent, as can be seen in Figure 2. Apart from localized zones of alteration along fractures, the basaltic glass shards are clear, pale brown in color, and optically isotropic. They do not diffract X-rays and display the characteristic “glass hump” in X-ray scans, confirming that they have been preserved in an amorphous state. Electron-probe micro-analyses of the fresh glass have totals that range from 97 to 99.7%, indicating that hydration is minimal (Table 1).

FIGURE 2

Tubules within glassy areas are abundant along many fracture surfaces (FS) and often form closely spaced arrays of densely packed tubules (Figure 2). Tubules originate from fracture surfaces or shard boundaries, and propagate inward, roughly perpendicular to the originating surface (Figure 2). Similar to modern seafloor microtubules (Staudigel et al., 2015), most SFVC features within glass are 1–2 μm in diameter and range up to ∼200–300 μm in length. The tubules are mostly hollow and typically form smooth curves, but complex knotted tangles are common, especially toward the ends of the tubules (Figure 2). The tubules do not display internal striae or segmentation, though some rare cases show small projections or buds from tubule walls. Bifurcation or branching of SFVC tubules is exceedingly rare, and in common with tubular textures from in situ oceanic crust localities, SFVC tubules have not been observed to cross one another, which may be related to microbial feeding behavior (Walton, 2008; McLoughlin et al., 2009). Tubules commonly terminate in rounded or complex, knotted forms, but terminal mineral inclusions have not been observed.

Microtubules in Altered Glass

Some regions of basaltic glass have been replaced with a colorless assemblage of Ca-rich zeolites (Figure 3), identified by μXRD as analcime, Ca-phillipsite, Ca-stilbite, and rarely, tschernichite (Figure 4). These patches of zeolitic alteration are localized along shard boundaries and fractures, and commonly display crystal forms at the interface between glass and zeolite. Tubule morphology typically changes within the zones of zeolite mineralization: while tubules in the fresh glass are smooth (Figure 3), those in the zeolite alteration zones commonly display a granular texture with a rough surface appearance (Figure 3). Within these zeolite zones, tubules are mineralized by fine-grained titanite. Tubules are continuous between zeolite and glass, with the parts of tubules lying within the zeolite alteration zones mineralized by fine-grained titanite and those within glass mostly hollow (Figure 5). Correlated optical and backscattered electron imaging further illustrating the textural relationship between zeolite alteration assemblages hosting titanite-mineralized tubules and the surrounding basaltic glass with hollow primary tubules are shown in Figure 6.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

Geochemical Signatures of the Microtubules

Compositional microanalysis using backscattered electron imaging and EDS compositional maps (Figure 7) indicates that the tubule-filling materials within zeolitic alteration zones are composed of Ca, Ti, Si, and O with trace Fe, and that the host material is composed dominantly of Ca, Al, Si, and O, consistent with titanite in a calcian zeolite host. The surrounding unaltered basaltic glass shows X-ray lines for Si, Na, Al, Mg, Ca, Fe, consistent with a basaltic composition. Elemental mapping of glass-hosted open tubules with wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy reveals that biologically important elements including C, N, and P are associated with tubular structures, both in the unaltered basaltic glass and within the zeolite alteration zones (Figure 8). Carbon stable isotope data fall mostly between mantle and seawater values (Figure 9). Carbon and oxygen stable isotopic compositions and total CO₂ yield are summarized in Table 2.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 8

FIGURE 9

Discussion

Origin and Preservation of Tubules in the SFVC Samples

Microscopic hollow tubules and granular structures in subaqueous basaltic glass have been reported from numerous localities worldwide (e.g., Staudigel et al., 2008a; Fisk and McLoughlin, 2013). Microbes are hypothesized to promote the dissolution of basaltic glass to liberate nutrients through energy-yielding redox reactions, or as components of biomolecules, through reactions such as (Emerson and Moyer, 2002):

Other nutrients that could be obtained through leaching of basaltic glass include other transition metals, phosphorous, and potassium. It is worthy of note that the SFVC glasses have higher K concentrations than most seafloor basaltic glasses and the increased K concentrations may have made the SFVC glasses more amenable to microbial colonization and growth than typical low-K oceanic tholeiites (Shervais and Hanan, 1989; Shervais et al., 2005c). High alkali concentrations may also enhance glass dissolution by depolymerization of the silicate network (Mysen and Frantz, 1993). Another possible mechanism of formation in response to a natural proton flux from seawater into the glass generated during glass alteration as protons from water replace cations in the glass (Fisk et al., 2019).

Tubular structures highly reminiscent of those in seafloor basaltic glasses have been documented in (rare) basaltic glass preserved in ophiolites, and in metamorphosed pillow rims in ophiolites and greenstone belts (Furnes et al., 2005; Banerjee et al., 2006; Staudigel et al., 2008a; Wacey et al., 2014). In metabasaltic rocks, these tubular features are commonly dominated by fine-grained titanite (Furnes et al., 2005; Staudigel et al., 2008a). Morphological evidence for a biogenic origin for tubular textures in basaltic includes segmented, bifurcated and spiral/helical tubule forms (Furnes et al., 2007; Staudigel et al., 2008b; Walton, 2008; McLoughlin et al., 2009). Putative bioalteration structures in the SFVC samples are always rooted on surfaces that were formerly exposed to external water, and were not observed completely enclosed in glass (Figure 2). Tubules located on conjugate sides of cracks are not aligned (Figure 2), as would be expected if the tubules formed as a result of dissolution along pre-existing weaknesses in the glass (Furnes et al., 2001; Staudigel et al., 2008a). In most instances, glass replacement is focused on zones with high tubule densities, suggesting that the tubules may enhance local alteration of the glass (Figure 3). The occurrence and textural characteristics of SFVC tubules are similar to those of many other putative microbial ichnofossils (e.g., Staudigel et al., 2008a; Fisk and McLoughlin, 2013). If interpreted as ichnofossils following the taxonomy of McLoughlin et al. (2009), the SFVC tubules are most consistent with the Tubulohyalichnus simplus ichnofossil taxon.

Elements of potential biological importance, including C, N, and P show elevated concentrations associated with tubular alteration in the SFVC tubules (Figure 8), similar to putative microbial bioalteration textures documented in other subaqueous basaltic glasses (e.g., Banerjee and Muehlenbachs, 2003; Banerjee et al., 2011). In this study, the presence of organic materials may be indicated by the elevated levels of C and N associated with tubules (Figure 8). Organic compounds, including aliphatic, aromatic, carboxylic, and amide moieties have been directly detected within tubules in fresh basaltic glass (Preston et al., 2011). Staining with compounds that target nucleic acids indicate that biological material is concentrated at the interface between the fresh and altered glass and especially in the walls and tips of tubular structures (Furnes et al., 1996; Giovannoni et al., 1996; Banerjee and Muehlenbachs, 2003). It is also possible that some of the carbonaceous material detected by EPMA includes fine-grained carbonates, similar to carbonates detected within tubules in seafloor basaltic glass (Benzerara et al., 2007). The δ¹³C values of carbonate extracted from SFVC glass samples mainly show evidence of interaction between seawater and basalt, but one sample does contain light carbon of uncertain origin (Figure 9). Banerjee and Muehlenbachs (2003) showed that the carbonate carbon isotope compositions of pillow basalt cores and glassy tubule-bearing hyaloclastite rims are consistent with the incorporation of biologically fractionated carbon, with the rims having consistently low δ¹³C values compared to the interiors.

The data presented here demonstrate that tubular structures may be preserved or pseudomorphed by titanite mineralization. While not every tubule is titanite-pseudomorphed, but the phenomenon is ubiquitous enough to provide a very plausible fossilization mechanism. In the SFVC samples, the fact that titanite mineralization is localized within the sections of tubular microtunnels that have been converted to zeolites, while it is largely absent from tubules in unaltered glass, supports the proposal that tubular structures are preserved or fossilized by titanite-mineralization. It has been suggested that the passive accumulation of Ti during microbial glass dissolution may provide nuclei for later titanite growth (Furnes et al., 2005; Knowles et al., 2013). The observation of titanite in little-altered basaltic glass from the Ontong-Java Plateau (Izawa et al., 2010a, b), and of Ti-rich particles within the unaltered glass in this study (Figure 10), are consistent with a passive accumulation mechanism. This study provides direct evidence for localization of titanite mineralization within tubular microtunnels in metamorphosed basaltic glass. Staudigel et al. (2014, 2015) proposed a two-stage model where passive accumulation mechanism pre-concentrates Ti within tubular structures, prior to large-scale titanite growth during metamorphism. Observations from the SFVC samples reported here support the two stage model, with titanite-mineralized tubules concentrated in zeolitized, metamorphosed zones with some small Ti-rich particles within the mainly hollow tubules in unaltered zones of SFVC glass, “ahead” of the titanite-zeolite alteration front (Figure 10).

FIGURE 10

Implications for Putative Archæan Ichnofossils

A longstanding debate has surrounded the interpretation of titanite features within metamorphosed basaltic glasses as a record of microbial activity. Grosch and McLoughlin (2014) have called into question the link between microbial ichnofossils in modern basaltic glasses (Fisk et al., 1998; Banerjee and Muehlenbachs, 2003; McLoughlin et al., 2009) and titanite microtextures documented in metabasalts (Furnes et al., 2004; Staudigel et al., 2015), suggesting instead a purely metamorphic origin for the titanite microtextures. While the results of the present study do not demonstrate that all titanite microtextures are derived from pre-existing microbial ichnofossils, the SFVC samples do convincingly show that such hollow features can be mineralized by titanite. Therefore, we conclude that titanite mineralization of microbial ichnofossils is a plausible mechanism for the formation of titanite microtextures in ancient metabasalts.

Partially mineralized tubules from the SFVC firmly link microtubules in seafloor basaltic glass with titanite-mineralized tubules in ancient metabasalts. This study documented the transition from largely hollow tubules in fresh, unaltered basaltic glass (formed by microbial mining of the glass for energy) to titanite-mineralized tubules and pseudo-tubules in altered or metamorphosed basaltic glass. If these features are the mineralized equivalents of microbial structures found in modern seafloor basaltic glass, they constitute an ichnofossil record of microbial activity in volcanic rocks dating back to Archæan times, possibly as far as ∼3.5 Ga (Banerjee et al., 2007; Fliegel et al., 2010).

It has been suggested that many titanite tubules in metabasalts are the result of dendritic crystal growth during metamorphism and therefore constitute pseudofossils, i.e., abiogenic structures that mimic fossils (Lepot et al., 2011). An important observation in the SFVC samples is that hollow tubules are contiguous with titanite-mineralized tubules, commonly changing abruptly at the interface between basaltic glass and a zeolite-rich alteration assemblage (Figures 3, 5). Terminal mineral inclusions and striated interior surfaces would be expected if the tubular features were ambient inclusion trails. The hollow sections of tubules within glass do not contain terminal mineral inclusions nor do they have striated interior surfaces. Our observations instead support an origin of titanite-mineralized tubules as ichnofossils produced by the mineralization of initially hollow microbial etch structures. Titanite has previously been observed in association with bioaltered basaltic glass, showing that titanite formation begins early in the alteration history of basaltic glass (Izawa et al., 2010a, b). It is possible that microbially mediated glass dissolution leads to the passive accumulation of Ti providing one of the necessary constituents for titanite and other Ti-bearing phases (Banerjee and Muehlenbachs, 2003; Knowles et al., 2013). During later metamorphism, these titanite-bearing precursor materials provide a template for overgrowths of metamorphic titanite. This is consistent with the observations reported here: titanite growth is localized in tubular bioalteration textures. Because the tubules are filled with fine-grained titanite, the original biogenic morphologies are well-preserved.

Conclusion

The investigation of partially titanite-mineralized tubules within SFVC basaltic glasses has provided several new insights.

• (1)

  Tubules meeting the textural and geological context criteria for microbial ichnofossils occur throughout SFVC basaltic glasses and are most consistent with the Tubulohyalichnus simplus ichnofossil taxon (McLoughlin et al., 2009).

• (2)

  Titanite mineralization in candidate microbial ichnofossils is localized within zeolite-rich alteration and commonly located along fractures and cracks within basaltic glass. Titanite mineralization follows along pre-existing hollow tubules in the SFVC glasses, with titanite-mineralized regions within zeolite merging with open tubules at the glass-alteration zone interface.

• (3)

  Micron-scale Ti-rich particles occur scattered within the hollow tubule zones, consistent with titanite mineralization occurring preferentially within tubules due to accumulation of Ti within the tubules, possibly as a result of passive accumulation during microbial etching. These findings reinforce previous detections of titanite associated with tubules from other locations (Izawa et al., 2010a).

• (4)

  The SFVC samples demonstrate that preservation of candidate microbial ichnofossils by titanite mineralization has occurred at least in this case, and supports the interpretation of some titanite microtextures in metabasalts as bona fide microbial trace fossils.

Microbial ichnofossils consisting of hollow tubules in basaltic glass have been observed at a stage representing the transformation from hollow tubules to titanite-filled tubular structures. The titanite-filled structures are interpreted as an early stage in the formation of titanite-filled tubular features like those documented in many ancient metabasalts including some of Archæan age. The SFVC glasses investigated here clearly demonstrate the possibility of a direct link between tubular microbial ichnofossils in modern seafloor basaltic glasses and titanite-mineralized structures in Archæan metabasalts, supporting previous interpretations of the Archæan features as a record of microbial activity in basaltic rocks stretching back to at least 3.5 Ga. This in turn supports the view that a microbial habitat based at least in part on basaltic glass as a substrate has been present on Earth for most of recorded geologic time, and that a record of this biological activity can be preserved in metabasalts, even through significant metamorphism.

References

• 1

  BanerjeeN.FurnesH.MuehlenbachsK.StaudigelH.de WitM. (2006). Preservation of 3.4-3.5 Ga microbial biomarkers in pillow lavas and hyaloclastites from the Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.241707–722. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  BanerjeeN.IzawaM.SapersH.WhitehouseM. (2011). Geochemical biosignatures preserved in microbially altered basaltic glass.Surf. Interf. Anal.43452–457. 10.1002/sia.3577

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  BanerjeeN.MuehlenbachsK. (2003). Tuff life: bioalteration in volcaniclastic rocks from the Ontong Java Plateau.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.41037–1059. 10.1029/2002GC000470

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  BanerjeeN. R.SimonettiA.FurnesH.MuehlenbachsK.StaudigelH.HeamanL.et al (2007). Direct dating of Archean microbial ichnofossils.Geology35487–490.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  BenzeraraK.MenguyN.BanerjeeN. R.TyliszczakT.BrownG. E.Jr.GuyotF. (2007). Alteration of submarine basaltic glass from the Ontong Java Plateau: a STXM and TEM study.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.260187–200.10.1016/j.epsl.2007.05.029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  CoplenT. (1994). Reporting of stable hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen isotopic abundances.Pure Appl. Chem.66273–276. 10.1351/pac199466020273

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  CraigH. (1957). Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass-spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta12133–149. 10.1016/0016-7037(57)90024-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  EmersonD.MoyerC. (2002). Neutrophilic Fe-oxidizing bacteria are abundant at the Loihi seamount hydrothermal vents and play a major role in Fe oxide deposition.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.683085–3093. 10.1128/aem.68.6.3085-3093.2002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  FiskM.GiovannoniS.ThorsethI. (1998). Alteration of oceanic volcanic glass: textural evidence of microbial activity.Science281978–980. 10.1126/science.281.5379.978

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  FiskM.McLoughlinN. (2013). Atlas of alteration textures in volcanic glass from the ocean basins.Geosphere9317–341. 10.1130/ges00827.1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  FiskM.Storrie-LombardiM. C.DouglasS.PopaR.McDonaldG.Di Meo-SavoieC. (2003). Evidence of biological activity in Hawaiian subsurface basalts.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.41103–1127. 10.1029/2002gc000387

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  FiskM. R.PopaR.WaceyD. (2019). Tunnel formation in basalt glass.Astrobiology19132–144. 10.1089/ast.2017.1791

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  FlemmingR. (2007). Micro X-ray diffraction mu XRD): a versatile technique for characterization of earth and planetary materials.Can. J. Earth Sci.441333–1346. 10.1139/e07-020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  FliegelD.KoslerJ.McLoughlinN.SimonettiA.de WitM. J.WirthR.et al (2010). In-situ dating of the Earth’s oldest trace fossil at 3.34 Ga.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.299290–298. 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.09.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  FurnesH.BanerjeeN.MuehlenbachsK.KontinenA. (2005). Preservation of biosignatures in metaglassy volcanic rocks from the Jormua ophiolite complex, Finland.Precambrian Res.136125–137. 10.1016/j.precamres.2004.09.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  FurnesH.BanerjeeN.MuehlenbachsK.StaudigelH.de WitM. (2004). Early life recorded in archean pillow lavas.Science304578–581. 10.1126/science.1095858

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  FurnesH.BanerjeeN. R.StaudigelH.MuehlenbachsK.McLoughlinN.WitM.et al (2007). Comparing petrographic signatures of bioalteration in recent to Mesoarchean pillow lavas: tracing subsurface life in oceanic igneous rocks.Precambrian Res.158156–176. 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  FurnesH.StaudigelH.ThorsethI. H.TorsvikT.MuehlenbachsK.TumyrO. (2001). Bioalteration of basaltic glass in the oceanic crust.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.2:1049.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  FurnesH.ThorsethI. H.TumyrO.TorsvikT.FiskM. R. (1996). Microbial Activity in the Alteration of Glass From Pillow Lavas From HOLE 896A.College Station, TX: Texas A & M University.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  GiovannoniS. J.FiskM. R.FurnesH. (1996). Genetic evidence for endolithic microbial life colonizing basaltic glass/sea water interfaces.Proc. Ocean Drill. Prog.148207–214.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  GroschE.McLoughlinN. (2014). Reassessing the biogenicity of Earth’s oldest trace fossil with implications for biosignatures in the search for early life.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1118380–8385. 10.1073/pnas.1402565111

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  HopsonC.PessagnoE. (2005). Tehama-Colusa serpentinite melange: a remnant of Franciscan jurassic oceanic lithosphere, northern California.Int. Geol. Rev.4765–100. 10.2747/0020-6814.47.1.65

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  IzawaM.BanerjeeN.FlemmingR.BridgeN. (2010a). Preservation of microbial ichnofossils in basaltic glass by titanite mineralization.Can. Mineral.481255–1265. 10.3749/canmin.48.5.1255

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  IzawaM.BanerjeeN.FlemmingR.BridgeN.SchultzC. (2010b). Basaltic glass as a habitat for microbial life: implications for astrobiology and planetary exploration.Planet. Space Sci.58583–591. 10.1016/j.pss.2009.09.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  KnowlesE.StaudigelH.TempletonA. (2013). Geochemical characterization of tubular alteration features in subseafloor basalt glass.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.374239–250. 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.05.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  LepotK.BenzeraraK.PhilppotP. (2011). Biogenic versus metamorphic origins of diverse microtubes in 2.7 Gyr old volcanic ashes: multi-scale observations.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.31237–47. 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.10.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  McCreaJ. (1950). On the isotopic chemistry of carbonates and a paleotemperature scale.J. Chem. Phys.18849–857. 10.1063/1.1747785

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  McLoughlinN.FurnesH.BanerjeeN.MuehlenbachsK.StaudigelH. (2009). Ichnotaxonomy of microbial trace fossils in volcanic glass.J. Geol. Soc.166159–169. 10.1144/0016-76492008-049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  MysenB. O.FrantzJ. D. (1993). Structure and properties of alkali silicate melts at magmatictemperatures.Eur. J. Mineral.3393–408. 10.1038/s41598-017-16741-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  PalfyJ.SmithP.MortensenJ. (2000). A U-Pb and Ar-40/Ar-39 time scale for the Jurassic.Can. J. Earth Sci.37923–944. 10.1073/pnas.1009828109

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  PessagnoE. A.Jr. (1977). Upper Jurassic Radiolaria and radiolarian biostratigraphy of the California Coast Ranges.Micropaleontology2356–113.

  • Google Scholar

• 32

  PrestonL.IzawaM.BanerjeeN. (2011). Infrared spectroscopic characterization of organic matter associated with microbial bioalteration textures in basaltic glass.Astrobiology11585–599. 10.1089/ast.2010.0604

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  RobinsonP.MelsonW.O’HearnT.SchminkeH. (1983). Volcanic glass compositions of the Troodos ophiolite, Cyprus.Geology11400–404.

  • Google Scholar

• 34

  ShervaisJ. (2001). Birth, death, and resurrection: the life cycle of suprasubduction zone ophiolites.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.2:200GC000080.

  • Google Scholar

• 35

  ShervaisJ.ChoiS. H.SharpW. D.RossJ.Zoglman-SchumanM.MukasaS. B. (2011). Serpentinite matrix mélange: implications of mixed provenance for mélange formation.Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap.4801–38.

  • Google Scholar

• 36

  ShervaisJ.HananB. (1989). Jurassic volcanic glass from the stonyford volcanic complex, franciscan assemblage, Northern California coast ranges.Geology17510–514.

  • Google Scholar

• 37

  ShervaisJ.KimbroughD. (1985). Geochemical evidence for the tectonic setting of the coast range ophiolite - A composite island arc-oceanic crust terrane in Western California.Geology1335–38.

  • Google Scholar

• 38

  ShervaisJ.KimbroughD. L.RenneP.HananB. B.MurcheyB.SnowC. A.et al (2004). Multi-stage origin of the Coast Range ophiolite, California: implications for the life cycle of supra-subduction zone ophiolites.Int. Geol. Rev.46289–315. 10.2747/0020-6814.46.4.289

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  ShervaisJ.MurcheyB.KimbroughD.RenneP.HananB. (2005a). Radioisotopic and biostratigraphic age relations in the Coast Range Ophiolite, northern California: implications for the tectonic evolution of the Western Cordillera.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.117633–653.

  • Google Scholar

• 40

  ShervaisJ.KolesarP.AndreasenK. (2005b). A field and chemical study of serpentinization - Stonyford, California: chemical flux and mass balance.Int. Geol. Rev.471–23. 10.2747/0020-6814.47.1.1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  ShervaisJ.SchumanM.HananB. (2005c). The Stonyford volcanic complex: a forearc seamount in the northern California Coast Ranges.J. Petrol.462091–2128. 10.1093/petrology/egi048

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  StaudigelH.FurnesH.De WitM. (2015). Paleoarchean trace fossils in altered volcanic glass.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1126892–6897. 10.1073/pnas.1421052112

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  StaudigelH.FurnesH.McLoughlinN.BanerjeeN. R.ConnellL. B.TempletonA.et al (2008a). 3.5 billion years of glass bioalteration: volcanic rocks as a basis for microbial life?Earth Sci. Rev.89156–176. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.04.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  StaudigelH.FurnesH.McloughlinN.BanerjeeN.ConnellL. B.TempletonA. (2008b). Microbial glass bioalteration: inferring mechanisnis of blocorrosion from trace fossil morphology.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta72A893–A893.

  • Google Scholar

• 45

  StaudigelH.FurnesH.SmitsM. (2014). Deep biosphere record of in situ oceanic lithosphere and ophiolites.Elements10121–126. 10.2113/gselements.10.2.121

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  WaceyD.McLoughlinN.SaundersM.KongC. (2014). The nano-scale anatomy of a complex carbon-lined microtube in volcanic glass from the similar to 92 Ma Troodos Ophiolite, Cyprus.Chem. Geol.3631–12. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  WaltonA. (2008). Microtubules in basalt glass from Hawaii scientific driling project #2 phase 1 core and Hilina slope, Hawaii: evidence of the occurrence and behavior of endolithic microorganisms.Geobiology6351–364. 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2008.00149.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar