Abstract
Hadal trenches are the deepest places on Earth and are important foci for natural carbon sequestration. Much of the sedimentary sequences that accumulate within hadal trenches have been linked to widespread slope sediment remobilization events, triggered by subduction zone earthquakes. Therefore, hadal trench deposits may provide valuable insights into the hazards posed by large earthquakes and their implications for the carbon cycle. Despite this strong societal relevance, no studies to date have provided the necessary coverage to understand the spatial and temporal variations of earthquake-triggered deposition along a hadal trench axis. We address these issues by integrating high-resolution bathymetry and subbottom profiler data, and sediment cores acquired over the entire hadal trench axis of the Japan Trench. We identify around 40 isolated trench-fill basins along the trench axis of the Japan Trench that document 115 sediment remobilization event deposits. We map the spatio-temporal distribution of the acoustically transparent event deposit bodies imaged in subbottom profiler data from the trench-fill basins. Using radiocarbon dating, slope failure deposits identified from subbotom profiles and sediment coring were shown to be co-eval with major historic earthquake (e.g., AD2011 Mw9.0–9.1 Tohoku-oki, AD1454 Mw≥8.4 Kyotoku, and AD869 Mw≥8.6 Jogan events). Furthermore, the lower part of the acoustically imaged stratigraphic succession in isolated basins along the Japan Trench also documents several thick acoustically transparent bodies that relate to older events. These identifications of event deposits allow quantitative constraints of along-strike variation of sediment volumes redistributed by episodic events along the entire trench axis, revealing that the total volumes of event deposits triggered by different historic large earthquakes are highly variable. We conclude that at least 7 Tg (1012 g) of organic carbon remobilized from surficial slope sediments is exported to the hadal axis of Japan Trench in the last 2,000 years by giant earthquakes. These findings highlight the significance of seismo-tectonic events for the long-term carbon cycle in hadal trenches and societal implications.
Introduction
Hadal trenches are formed by the downward bending of oceanic crust in the plate subduction zone at 6–11 km water depths. As a result of the challenges in surveying and sampling in such great water depths, hadal trenches remain largely unexplored, yet they act as terminal sinks for sediment, organic carbon (OC) and even pollutants (; ). The study of hadal trenches may allow to (i) unravel the history of subduction zone processes, including the world’s largest earthquakes that occur in such subduction margin settings, and (ii) to investigate the deep-marine carbon cycle. In hadal trenches, the steep slopes and isolated nature of the deep-water basins act as potential depocenters for organic matter (). Sediment mass-wasting events and the resulting high supply of organic matter influence the benthic communities in the hadal environments (; ; ), as the hadal microbial system is distinct relative to shallower water depths and retained by internal recycling of organic matter (). Short-term biogeochemistry models predict global decreases in ocean benthic mass particularly at the hadal zone, in response to reduced supply of organic material due to climate change during the 21st century (e.g., ). Moreover, on longer geological time scales, the deposition, burial and subduction of OC within marine sediment in plate subduction margins can play a pivotal role in the long-term carbon cycle, influencing atmospheric CO2 amounts over millions of years (; ; ). Nevertheless, quantitative studies in hadal trenches have been hindered due to the limited availability of high quality data, in contrast to other continental margins. However, the recent improvement in data acquisition and observation in the hadal trenches has greatly benefited these studies. Therefore, unraveling sedimentary sequences in hadal trenches represents new frontiers in sedimentology, allowing a better understanding of sediment mass and carbon transport and storage from shallow waters to the ultimate deepest sinks of the world’s oceans and their societal implications.
Megathrust earthquakes and associated tsunami have resulted in major societal and economic impacts. Globally, there have been five magnitude-9 class earthquakes instrumentally recorded during the last century, including AD 1952 moment magnitude (Mw) ∼9.0 Severo-Kurilsk earthquake offshore Kamchatka Peninsula (e.g., ), AD 1960 Mw9.4–9.6 Valdivia earthquake in Chile (e.g., ), AD 1964 Mw∼9.2 Alaskan earthquake (e.g., ), AD 2004 Mw9.1–9.3 Indian Ocean earthquake offshore Sumatra (; ), and AD 2011 Mw9.0–9.1 Tohoku-oki earthquake offshore northeast Japan. Four of these megathrust earthquakes occurred near hadal trenches. Notably, the AD 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake, which occurred along the hadal Japan Trench, generated the largest-ever-recorded coseismic slip (), horizontal displacement and vertical uplift (; ; ), and a powerful tsunami with coastal run-up heights up to 40 m (). Our knowledge of large magnitude earthquakes can be extended prior to the window of instrumental records (around 100 years) using historical documents (). Depositional archives from coasts, lakes, and marine sediments have been used to look further back in time (; ; ). Yet, there remain significant uncertainties with respect to the locations, magnitudes, and mechanisms of historical large earthquakes, and their societal impacts. Hence, investigating sedimentary sequences in hadal trenches also helps reconstructing past subduction zone earthquake magnitude-frequency relations, allowing a better assessment of hazard and risk for coastal populations and infrastructure along the active margins.
In the hadal Japan Trench, the AD 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake remobilized young fine-grained surficial slope sediments enriched in organic matter, which was eventually deposited in the more than 7 km deep trench (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). Remarkably, the 2011 earthquake delivered >1 Tg (1012 g) of OC to the Japan Trench between 36.0° and 39.5°N through the resedimentation of spatially widespread remobilization of surficial sediment with a total volume of ∼0.2 km3 (). Moreover, several cores from the central part of the Japan Trench document evidence for event deposits related to surficial sediment remobilization triggered by older large earthquakes in the last few thousands of years, including the well-known AD 1454 Kyotoku and AD 869 Jogan earthquakes (, ; ). Yet, little is understood about (1) the temporal and spatial extent of the earthquake-triggered event deposits along the plate subduction zone, (2) whether older deposits may indicate prehistoric large earthquakes, and (3) the importance of recurrent large earthquakes for the carbon cycle at subduction margins.
Here, we aim to address these issues by integrating high-resolution bathymetry and dm-scale vertical resolution subbottom profiler (SBP) data, and sediment cores acquired by many research cruises during 2012–2018 over 530 km along strike the hadal trench axis of the Japan Trench (36.0°–40.5°N). These data allow a detailed study of event stratigraphy in an entire hadal trench for the first time to our knowledge. First, we identify isolated trench-fill basins along the trench axis of Japan Trench that document sediment remobilization event deposits. Second, at the identified trench-fill basins, we map the event-stratigraphic distribution of the acoustically transparent bodies imaged in SBP data. Third, we correlate the acoustically transparent bodies that represent the event deposits triggered by major historic earthquakes. Fourth, we quantify along-strike variation of sediment volumes and OC contents of the event deposits related to past large earthquakes along the entire trench axis. By integrating and discussing the results, we also examine (i) the submarine paleoseismology approach of linking the spatio-temporal inventory of major sediment remobilization event deposits to the history of giant earthquakes, and (ii) the hypothesis that sediment remobilization induced by recurring giant earthquakes supplies large quantities of OC to the hadal trench over geological time scales.
Japan Trench
Geological Setting
The Japan Trench occurs at the plate boundary where the Pacific Plate is subducting beneath the Okhotsk Plate () or its separated microplate (e.g., ), extending from the triple junction between the Pacific, Philippine Sea and Okhotsk plates in the south to the intersection with the Kuril Trench in the north. A relatively moderate to rapid convergence rate of 7–9 cm/yr (e.g., ) and relatively thin sediment cover at the trench (0.4–1 km: ; ) control development of the Japan Trench, which may favor the occurrence of subduction erosion producing tectonic subsidence (; ). Although there is no typical forearc basin, isolated basins occur on the upper slope terrace (; ). The lower slope is steeper with an average gradient of ∼5° (; ). Active faulting along the subduction margin (; ; ; ) forms a narrow mid-slope terrace at water depths of 4,000–6,000 m. The Japan Trench is characterized by the N-S to NNE-SSW trending horst-and-graben structures formed by flexural bending of the subducting Pacific plate, resulting in rough trench-floor morphology with isolated trench-fill and graben-fill basins (; ). Our study area of the deep Japan Trench is bounded by the subducting Erimo and Daiichi-Kashima seamounts in the north and south, respectively (), constraining the trench to around 530 km long (Figure 1). The floor of the trench-axis is relatively shallower at the northern and central trench basins ranging between around 7,400 and 7,700 m, while the southern trench basin north of Daiichi-Kashima Seamount reaches a water depth of 8,030 m (). While no major canyon system is present along most parts of the Japan Trench, the Ogawara and Nakaminato submarine canyon systems connect the continental margin and trench axis in the northernmost and southernmost Japan Trench (Figure 1). In this study, we divided the Japan Trench into the three segments, southern, central, and northern Japan Trench, based on water depths at the trench axis and structural complexities along the trench.
FIGURE 1
Historically Documented Large Earthquakes
The AD 2011 Mw9.0–9.1 Tohoku-oki earthquake is one of the largest earthquakes instrumentally recorded. Other than the 2011 earthquake, several large earthquakes with magnitude of >8 are historically well known along the Japan Trench that have been identified from tsunami deposits along the coast of Fukushima, Miyagi, Iwate, and Aomori Prefectures (Figure 1). For example, the AD 1968 Mw8.2–8.3 Tokachi-oki (Northern Sanriku-oki) megathrust earthquake (
Another potentially large earthquake, the AD 1611 Keicho event, is discussed in the literature to be of possible similar size as the AD 1454 earthquake, as inferred from tsunami reported along the coast of Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures (
Data and Methods
Bathymetry Data
We acquired high-resolution bathymetry data along the entire trench axis during the R/V Sonne SO251-1 cruise in October 2016 (
We combined a modern digital evaluation model (DEM) calculated from bathymetry data at the water depths of <∼6,000 m acquired before 2011 by the Japanese research cruises (
High-Resolution Subbottom Profiler (SBP) Data
In this study, we combine SBP data that were obtained during eight research cruises with two different acquisition systems: SO251-1 (October 2016) and SO219A-2 cruises (March–April 2012) by R/V Sonne equipped with ATLAS PARASOUND P70 echosounder and KS-18-10 (August 2018), KS-17-13 (October 2017), KS-16-14 (September 2016), KS-15-16 (November 2015), KS-15-3 (May 2015), and KS-14-16 cruises (September 2014) by R/V Shinsei-maru with KONGSBERG TOPAS PS18. The PARASOUND echosounder emits two high frequencies of 18 kHz and 22 kHz, and non-linear interference of the high frequencies produces a secondary frequency of about 4 kHz. The TOPAS system uses a primary frequency of 15–21 kHz, and a secondary frequency of 0.5–6.0 kHz. Frequency filtering was done through low-pass bandpass at 6 kHz for PARASOUND data (
The studied SBP data acquired by both systems often contain noisy traces that are caused by either interference of the ship’s multibeam system or bad weather conditions (i.e., swell). Thus, following supplementary material of
Sediment Cores and Radiocarbon Dating of Background Sediment
Previous studies reported many sediment cores taken along the trench axis of the Japan Trench. Several of these cores have been used previously to establish detailed understanding of sedimentation processes, including the deposition of thick event deposits correlated to historical earthquakes (
Following the same concept of age determination and relative dating of event-deposits as applied for cores from the central Japan Trench (
Identification of the Event Deposits Within Individual Trench-Fill Basins and Areal Extent and Volume of the Identified Event Deposits
As reported in previous studies, high-resolution SBP data along and across the flat trench basins image distinct bodies with acoustically transparent seismic facies, a basal higher amplitude reflection and ponded geometries. Acoustically transparent bodies in SBP data represent event deposition of thick homogenous, fine-grained relatively young sediments, in part overlying comparably thin basal sand beds (
Correlation of Acoustically Transparent Bodies Between Neighboring Basins
Only in rare cases can picked horizons be confidently tracked across individual trench-fill basins. Therefore, stratigraphic correlation of acoustically transparent bodies of interest between neighboring trench-fill basins (i.e., testing for the respective deposits in a given trench-basin to correspond to the same event in its neighboring basins), relies on visual correlation and comparative pattern recognition. To objectively validate the visual correlation, we also applied computational signal analysis for SBP data. We performed the automatic correlation for the SBP traces of interest using the conventional dynamic time warping (DTW;
where m ∈ ℕ and n ∈ ℕ are the lengths of the two SBP traces, ti (i = 1, 2,…) is the TWT, and ai and bi are the envelope values of the two SBP traces. We obtained an alignment between the two SBP traces a and b having minimal overall cost through computing the Euclidian distances between the ith (i ∈ [1, m]) sample of a and jth (j ∈ [1, n]) sample of b. Event deposits are generally homogenous and thus characterized by low-amplitude wiggles in SBP data. Event deposits from cores are in parts accompanied with basal sand beds (
Results
Inferred Flow Pathways and Accumulation Along the Trench
Using a DEM made through combining the bathymetry data shallower than hadal depths and high-resolution bathymetry deeper than >5500 m, we calculated flow accumulation along the Japan Trench (Figure 2). The trench floor of the northernmost Japan Trench, where it connects to the Ogawara canyon, has the largest flow accumulation in the entire Japan Trench (trench-floor basin JTN08: 5.3 × 1010 m2). Similarly, the southernmost Japan Trench also can experience large flow accumulation as it connects to the Nakaminato canyon (trench-floor basin JTS01: 1.4 × 1010 m2). It is also fed by a smaller sediment routing system from the north (indicated by gray arrows in Figure 2) connecting trench-floor basins JTS04, JTS03, and JTS02 (see section “Identification, Dating, and Correlation of the Event Deposits Along the Trench” for these identified basins). On the other hand, the trench axis floors between 36.8°N and 36.9°N, 38.1°N and 38.3°N, 39.0°N and 39.3°N, 39.7°N and 40.0°N, and 40.1°N and 40.2°N, are fed by individual smaller sediment routing systems yield low flow accumulation values ranging between 1×107–1×108 m2. This suggests smaller catchment areas for sediment remobilization and/or less along-trench connectivity between these areas. The flow accumulation analysis also reveals that the different lateral sediment transport systems from the upper slope into the trench are funneled and can be reflected to form flow path systems along the trench axis for several tens of kilometers, connecting individual trench-slope basins. These systems are separated by bathymetric highs formed by the interconnection of different structural elements of the flexural-bended Pacific plate entering the subduction zone system.
FIGURE 2

Flow accumulation in (a) the entire Japan Trench, (b) the southern Japan Trench, (c,d) the central Japan Trench, and (e) petit-spot area. The square root of flow accumulation (m2) is shown for the presentation purpose. The identified isolated fill-basins are also shown (see Figure 3).
Identification, Dating, and Correlation of the Event Deposits Along the Trench
Southern Japan Trench
The seafloor of the trench axis in the southern Japan Trench is up to 8,030 m deep in the southernmost segment (36.08°N), while it becomes shallower (7,560 m) in the northernmost segment at 37.7°N (Figure 3A). The overall quality of along-trench SBP data was relatively good even for deep and narrow trench-fill basins. The SBP data imaged laterally continuous reflection signals down to ∼40–100 millisecond two-way travel time (ms TWT) below the seafloor in the trench-fill basins (i.e., ∼30–80 m below the seafloor (mbsf) assuming P-wave velocities of 1,500–1,700 m/s). The SBP data at several basins had less signal penetration, partly due to complex subsurface structures with chaotic acoustic facies that strongly attenuated the acoustic signals. For example, deeper acoustic facies at the basins JTS05 and JTS13 might be interpreted as local mass-transport deposits (
TABLE 1
| Basin | SBP Unit | Correlation inferred | Maximum | Area (km2) | Volume (×106 m3) | Age estimated | Possible link to known |
| by DTW | thickness (m) | from cores | large earthquakes | ||||
| Southern Japan Trench | |||||||
| JTS01 (142.727°E, 36.076°N, WD: −8034 m) | |||||||
| U1-S01 | U1-S02 | 3.7 (+ 0.6/−0.1) | 29.4 (±0.5) | 54 (+11/−3) | AD 2011 | AD 2011 | |
| U2-S01 | 1.0 (+0.2/−0.1) | 27.9 (±1.1) | 14 (+6/−3) | AD 1846 (+22/−25) | AD 1793/1896/1897 (?) | ||
| U3-S01 | U3-S02 | 2.6 (+0.4/−0.1) | 28.3 (±1.1) | 31 (+9/−4) | AD 1671 (+44/−52) | AD1677 | |
| U4-S01 | U4-S02 | 3.4 (+0.6/−0.1) | 27.1 (±1.1) | 40 (+10/−4) | AD 980 (+78/−157) | AD 869 | |
| U5-S01 | 1.4 (+0.3/−0.1) | 23.0 (±1.0) | 15 (+5/−3) | 3.39 (+0.52/−0.15) ka | |||
| U6-S01 | 2.2 (+0.4/−0.1) | 23.0 (±1.0) | 32 (+8/−4) | 5.46 (+0.83/−0.22) ka | |||
| U7-S01 | 2.0 (+0.4/−0.1) | 23.0 (±1.0) | 30 (+8/−3) | 6.91 (+1.06/−0.27) ka | |||
| JTS02 (142.836°E, 36.166°N, WD: −7998 m) | |||||||
| U1-S02 | U1-S01 | 3.2 (+0.6/−0.1) | 4.1 (±0.2) | 9.5 (+2.2/−0.9) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S02 | 0.9 (+0.2/−0.1) | 3.5 (±0.4) | 1.4 (+0.8/−0.5) | ||||
| U3-S02 | U3-S01 | 3.0 (+0.5/−0.1) | 4.0 (±0.4) | 7.6 (+2.4/−1.1) | AD1677 | ||
| U4-S02 | U4-S01 | 4.4 (+0.7/−0.1) | 4.0 (±0.4) | 11 (+3/−1) | AD 869 | ||
| JTS03 (142.861°E, 36.194°N, WD: −7987 m) | |||||||
| U1-S03 | U1-S02 | 1.3 (+0.3/−0.1) | 0.20 (±0.04) | 0.15 (+0.08/−0.05) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S03 | U2-S02 | 0.5 (+0.2/−0.1) | 0.15 (±0.04) | 0.05 (+0.04/−0.02) | |||
| U3-S03 | U3-S02 | 1.5 (+0.3/−0.1) | 0.15 (±0.04) | 0.16 (+0.09/−0.05) | AD1677 | ||
| U4-S03 | U4-S02 | 2.1 (+0.4/−0.1) | 0.15 (±0.04) | 0.18 (+0.10/−0.06) | AD 869 | ||
| JTS04 (142.938°E, 36.328°N, WD: −8002 m) | |||||||
| U1-S04 | U1-S03 | 4.9 (+0.7/−0.1) | 18.3 (±0.4) | 43 (+9/−3) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S04 | U2-S03 | 1.6 (+0.3/−0.1) | 18.3 (±0.9) | 12 (+4/−2) | |||
| U3-S04 | U3-S03 | 2.2 (+0.4/−0.1) | 18.3 (±0.9) | 21 (+6/−3) | AD1677 | ||
| U4-S04 | U4-S03 | 5.6 (+0.8/−0.1) | 18.3 (±0.9) | 45 (+11/−4) | AD 869 | ||
| U5-S04 | 5.7 (+0.9/−0.1) | 2.1 (±0.3) | 7.3 (+2.4/−1.2) | ||||
| JTS05 (142.999°E, 36.403°N, WD: −7972 m) | |||||||
| U1-S05 | U1-S04 | 2.9 (+0.5/−0.1) | 7.2 (±0.3) | 12 (+3/−1) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S05 | U2-S04 | 0.9 (+0.2/−0.1) | 5.2 (±0.5) | 3.1 (+1.4/−0.8) | |||
| U3-S05 | U3-S04 | 1.6 (+0.3/−0.1) | 5.2 (±0.5) | 3.4 (+1.4/−0.8) | AD1677 | ||
| JTS06 (143.103°E, 36.535°N, WD: −7820 m) | |||||||
| U1-S06 | 2.7 (+0.5/−0.1) | 1.0 (±0.1) | 2.1 (+0.6/−0.3) | AD 2011 | |||
| JTS07 (143.315°E, 36.766°N, WD: −7651 m) | |||||||
| U1-S07 | 2.3 (+0.4/−0.1) | 6.1 (±0.2) | 9.3 (+2.3/−1.0) | AD 2011 | |||
| JTS08 (143.396°E, 36.856°N, WD: −7686 m) | |||||||
| U1-S08 | U1-S05 | 4.6 (+0.7/−0.1) | 3.2 (±0.2) | 12 (+3/−1) | AD 2011 | ||
| JTS09 (143.402°E, 36.883°N, WD: −7701 m) | |||||||
| U1-S09 | U4-S10 | 1.3 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.8 (±0.3) | 1.2 (+0.6/−0.3) | AD 869 | ||
| JTS10 (143.426°E, 36.914°N, WD: −7716 m) | |||||||
| U1-S10 | U1-S11 | 1.4 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.8 (±0.1) | 1.7 (+0.6/−0.3) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S10 | U2-S11 | 1.4 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.8 (±0.3) | 1.1 (+0.6/−0.3) | |||
| U3-S10 | U3-S11 | 1.5 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.3 (±0.2) | 0.89 (+0.48/−0.27) | |||
| U4-S10 | U4-S04 | 1.7 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.1 (±0.2) | 1.3 (+0.6/−0.4) | AD 869 | ||
| JTS11 (143.447°E, 36.947°N, WD: −7722 m) | |||||||
| U1-S11 | U1-S10 | 1.7 (+0.3/−0.1) | 2.3 (±0.2) | 1.9 (+0.7/−0.3) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S11 | U2-S10 | 1.9 (+0.4/−0.1) | 1.6 (±0.3) | 2.4 (+1.0/−0.5) | |||
| U3-S11 | U3-S10 | 1.3 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.4 (±0.2) | 1.3 (+0.6/−0.3) | |||
| U4-S11 | U4-S10 | 2.7 (+0.5/−0.1) | 1.6 (±0.3) | 3.7 (+1.4/−0.7) | AD 869 | ||
| JTS12 (143.485°E, 37.002°N, WD: −7735 m) | |||||||
| U1-S12 | U1-S11 | 1.5 (+0.3/−0.1) | 4.3 (±0.2) | 4.0 (+1.3/−0.6) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S12 | U2-S11 | 1.3 (+0.3/−0.1) | 4.0 (±0.4) | 4.5 (+1.6/−0.8) | |||
| U3-S12 | U4-S11 | 3.6 (+0.6/−0.1) | 4.0 (±0.4) | 9.4 (+2.8/−1.3) | AD 869 | ||
| JTS13 (143.614°E, 37.171°N, WD: −7794 m) | |||||||
| U1-S13 | U1-S12 | 2.2 (+0.4/−0.1) | 10.2 (±0.3) | 18 (+4/−2) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S13 | U3-S12 | 3.2 (+0.5/−0.1) | 10.2 (±0.6) | 21 (+6/−2) | AD 869 | ||
| JTS14 (143.726°E, 37.373°N, WD: −7829 m) | |||||||
| U1-S14 | U1-S13 | 1.1 (+0.3/−0.1) | 4.7 (±0.2) | 2.9 (+1.0/−0.6) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S14 | U2-S13 | 3.3 (+0.5/−0.1) | 1.7 (±0.3) | 3.7 (+1.4/−0.7) | AD 869 | ||
| U3-S14 | 1.9 (+0.4/−0.1) | 0.89 (±0.20) | 1.4 (+0.6/−0.4) | ||||
| JTS15 (143.740°E, 37.413°N, WD: −7826 m) | |||||||
| U1-S15 | U1-S14 | 1.2 (+0.3/−0.1) | 8.2 (±0.3) | 4.1 (+1.6/−0.9) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-S15 | 0.9 (+0.2/−0.1) | 8.0 (±0.6) | 3.8 (+1.8/−1.0) | AD1454/1611 | AD1454 | ||
| U3-S15 | U2-S14 | 3.6 (+0.6/−0.1) | 8.0 (±0.6) | 17 (+5/−2) | AD869 | AD 869 | |
| U4-S15 | 1.6 (+0.3/−0.1) | 7.2 (±0.5) | 7.2 (+2.5/−1.2) | 2.25 (+0.40/−0.20) ka | 2.4−2.6 ka (?) | ||
| U5-S15 | 1.6 (+0.3/−0.1) | 3.0 (±0.4) | 2.2 (+1.0/−0.5) | 4.02 (+1.03/−0.48) ka | |||
| U6-S15 | 1.6 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.1 (±0.2) | 1.0 (+0.5/−0.3) | 8.03 (+2.47/−1.09) ka | |||
| JTS16 (143.860°E, 37.703°N, WD: −7556 m) | |||||||
| U1-S16 | U1-S15 | 1.4 (+0.3/−0.1) | 16.0 (±0.8) | 9.2 (+3.7/−2.0) | AD 869 | AD 869 | |
| U2-S16 | 3.6 (+0.6/−0.1) | 16.1 (±0.8) | 34 (+8/−3) | 25–40 ka | |||
Longitude, latitude and water depth (WD) of modern depocenter, acoustically transparent SBP body units, correlation to neighboring SBP units inferred by DTW, maximum thicknesses, areal extents, and volumes of identified event deposits, estimated ages from cores, and possible links to historically known large earthquakes at a given trench fill-basin in the southern Japan Trench.
The properties for the AD 2011 event are from
FIGURE 3

Water depth, identified trench-fill basins, and their SBP images along the trench axis of (A) southernJapan Trench, (B) central Japan Trench, and (C) northern Japan Trench. Yellow fills are identified acoustically transparent event bodies based solely on SBP data, whereas green fills are the acoustically transparent event bodies validated by sediment cores.
FIGURE 4

Close-up examples of acoustically transparent bodies and SBP-to-core correlation. Note that the deeper intervals of SBP images (B,D) are gained as compared with the shallower intervals (A,C). The deeper interval of SBP image (F) is presented at a reduced vertical exaggeration as compared with the shallower interval (E).
At the southernmost basin (JTS01), the largest trench-fill basin located at the deepest water depth, seven acoustically transparent bodies (U1-S01, U2-S01, …, U7-S01) were identified in the ∼50 m thick stratigraphic succession imaged by the SBP data (Figures 3A, 4A,B). The core GeoB21804 taken from the depocentre of JTS01 basin exhibits olive-gray diatomaceous mud interbedded with silt laminae, sand beds with sharp upper and lower contacts, and intervals of mixed mud (Figure 5;
FIGURE 5

Typical examples of radiographs, photos, and magnetic susceptibility (MS) of sediment cores GeoB21804, GeoB16431, and GeoB21817 in the southern, central, and northern Japan Trench, respectively.
FIGURE 6

Sediment cores taken at the trench-fill basins of Japan Trench identified in this study, wiggles of SBP data at the core locations, and 14C age profile. The cores GeoB21804, KS-17-13 PC01, KS-15-16 PC01, KS-18-10 PC01, and GeoB21817 are from this study, while the other cores are from previous studies (
At the basin JTS15, where flow accumulation is highest in the southern Japan Trench (Figure 2), six acoustically transparent bodies (U1-S15, U2-S15, …, U6-S15) were identified in SBP data (Figures 3A, 4). The core KS-15-3 PC08 (
At the basin JTS16, located at shallowest water depth in the southern Japan Trench, we could identify only one very thin (∼5 ms TWT below the seafloor) and one deep (60–65 ms TWT below the seafloor) acoustically transparent body. Correlation between SBP data and core GeoB16444-1 (
Core-to-SBP data correlation is also relatively good in trench-basins JTS09 and JTS10, where acoustically transparent bodies in SBP data correlate with intervals of homogenous diatomaceous mud in cores KS-14-16 PC01 (
FIGURE 7

Correlation of identified event deposit bodies between neighboring trench-fill basins in (A) the southern Japan Trench, (B) the central Japan Trench, and (C) the northern Japan Trench. The solid lines connecting individual identified event units between different basins indicate that the correlation is supported either by both image interpretation and DTW or evidence from cores, while the dash lines connecting individual identified event units indicate the correlation is expected from either image interpretation or DTW.
Central Japan Trench
The water depth of the trench floor in the central Japan Trench is generally shallower than the southern Japan Trench, ranging between 7,350 and 7,690 m (Figure 3B). Most of SBP penetration in the central Japan Trench was limited to 35 ms TWT (26–30 m) below the seafloor. Nevertheless, we identified several acoustically transparent bodies of ∼1 to ∼13 ms TWT in thickness within the basins. We consequently identified fifteen isolated trench-fill basins (JTC01–JTC15) in the central Japan Trench (Table 2 and Figure 3B). The basins JTC01–JTC13 identified between 37.9° and 39.1°N are narrow and limited to 5 km long along the trench, because of local slumps and trench-floor deformation by coseismic slip-to-the trench (
TABLE 2
| Basin | SBP Unit | Correlation inferred | Maximum | Area (km2) | Volume (×106 m3) | Age estimated | Possible link to known |
| by DTW | thickness (m) | from cores | large earthquakes | ||||
| Central Japan Trench | |||||||
| JTC01 (143.989°E, 37.953°N, WD: −7532 m) | |||||||
| NaN | 0.2 (+0.1/−0.1) | 2.0 (±0.1) | 0.41 (+0.03/−0.03) | AD 2011 | |||
| U1-C01 | U1-C02 | 0.9 (+0.2/−0.1) | 2.0 (±0.3) | 1.2 (+0.6/−0.4) | AD 1454/1611 | AD 1454 | |
| U2-C01 | U2-C02 | 1.3 (+0.3/−0.1) | 2.0 (±0.3) | 1.3 (+0.6/−0.4) | AD 869 | AD 869 | |
| JTC02 (144.006°E, 38.009°N, WD: −7569 m) | |||||||
| NaN | 0.2 (+0.1/−0.1) | 3.9 (±0.2) | 0.79 (+0.04/−0.04) | AD 2011 | |||
| U1-C02 | U1-C04 | 2.0 (+0.4/−0.1) | 4.0 (±0.4) | 5.1 (+1.8/−0.9) | AD 1454/1611 | AD 1454 | |
| U2-C02 | U2-C04 | 2.8 (+0.5/−0.1) | 3.6 (±0.4) | 6.0 (+2.0/−1.0) | AD 869 | AD 869 | |
| JTC03 (143.990°E, 38.022°N, WD: −7560 m) | |||||||
| NaN | 0.2 (+0.1/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.1) | 0.13 (+0.02/−0.02) | AD 2011 | |||
| U1-C03 | U1-C02 | 1.7 (+0.3/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.2) | 0.84 (+0.46/−0.27) | AD 1454 | ||
| U2-C03 | U2-C02 | 1.7 (+0.3/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.2) | 0.81 (+0.44/−0.26) | AD 869 | ||
| JTC04 (143.995°E, 38.098°N, WD: −7558 m) | |||||||
| NaN | 0.2 (+0.1/−0.1) | 2.1 (±0.1) | 0.42 (+0.03/−0.03) | AD 2011 | |||
| U1-C04 | U2-C06 | 2.4 (+0.4/−0.1) | 2.5 (±0.3) | 3.5 (+1.3/−0.7) | AD 1454/1611 | AD 1454 | |
| U2-C04 | U3-C06 | 2.4 (+0.4/−0.1) | 2.4 (±0.3) | 3.1 (+1.2/−0.6) | AD 869 | AD 869 | |
| JTC05 (144.059°E, 38.298°N, WD: −7457 m) | |||||||
| NaN | 0.2 (+0.1/−0.1) | 1.8 (±0.1) | 0.36 (+0.03/−0.03) | AD 2011 | |||
| JTC06 (144.108°E, 38.644°N, WD: −7661 m) | |||||||
| U1-C06 | U1-C07 | 2.0 (+0.4/−0.1) | 1.3 (±0.2) | 1.7 (+0.7/−0.4) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-C06 | U2-C07 | 9.4 (+1.4/−0.1) | 2.5 (±0.3) | 13 (+4/−2) | AD 1454 | ||
| U3-C06 | U3-C07 | 6.9 (+1.0/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.2) | 3.1 (+1.4/−0.8) | AD 869 | ||
| JTC07 (144.130°E, 38.743°N, WD: −7622 m) | |||||||
| U1-C07 | U1-C09 | 1.1 (+0.3/−0.1) | 3.9 (±0.2) | 3.1 (+1.0/−0.5) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-C07 | U1-C08 | 5.4 (+0.8/−0.1) | 4.0 (±0.4) | 17 (+5/−2) | AD 1454 | ||
| U3-C07 | U2-C08 | 4.3 (+0.7/−0.1) | 3.7 (±0.4) | 10.3 (+3.1/−1.4) | AD 869 | ||
| U4-C07 | 2.0 (+0.4/−0.1) | 3.5 (±0.4) | 10.0 (+3.0/−1.4) | 3.8–4.9 ka | 3.8–4.1 ka (?) | ||
| JTC08 (144.148°E, 38.866°N, WD: −7456 m) | |||||||
| U1-C08 | U2-C09 | 2.8 (+0.5/−0.1) | 0.8 (±0.2) | 1.9 (+0.9/−0.5) | AD 1454 | ||
| U2-C08 | U3-C09 | 2.2 (+0.4/−0.1) | 0.8 (±0.2) | 1.4 (+0.7/−0.4) | AD 869 | ||
| JTC09 (144.155°E, 38.836°N, WD: −7614 m) | |||||||
| U1-C09 | U1-C10 | 1.7 (+0.3/−0.1) | 2.5 (±0.2) | 2.2 (+0.7/−0.4) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-C09 | U2-C10 | 1.6 (+0.3/−0.1) | 2.5 (±0.3) | 2.8 (+1.1/−0.6) | AD 1454 | ||
| U3-C09 | U3-C10 | 2.3 (+0.4/−0.1) | 1.9 (±0.3) | 3.0 (+1.1/−0.6) | AD 869 | ||
| U4-C09 | 1.5 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.5 (±0.3) | 2.4 (+1.0/−0.5) | 3.8–4.1 ka (?) | |||
| JTC10 (144.152°E, 38.869°N, WD: −7632 m) | |||||||
| U1-C10 | U1-C11 | 1.8 (+0.3/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.1) | 0.87 (+0.32/−0.16) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-C10 | U2-C11 | 5.8 (+0.9/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.2) | 3.1 (+1.4/−0.8) | AD 1454 | ||
| U3-C10 | U3-C11 | 3.8 (+0.6/−0.1) | 0.6 (±0.2) | 1.7 (+0.8/−0.5) | AD 869 | ||
| JTC11 (144.158°E, 38.904°N, WD: −7642 m) | |||||||
| U1-C11 | U1-C10 | 1.3 (+0.3/−0.1) | 4.3 (±0.2) | 3.1 (+1.0/−0.6) | AD 2011 | ||
| U2-C11 | U2-C10 | 5.1 (+0.8/−0.1) | 4.6 (±0.4) | 16 (+4/−2) | AD 1454 | ||
| U3-C11 | U3-C10 | 4.2 (+0.7/−0.1) | 4.6 (±0.4) | 8.4 (+2.6/−1.2) | AD 869 | ||
| U4-C11 | 1.5 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.6 (±0.3) | 1.6 (+0.7/−0.4) | 3.8–4.1 ka (?) | |||
| JTC12 (144.215°E, 39.082°N, WD: −7440 m) | |||||||
| U1-C12 | U1-C13 | 1.0 (+0.2/−0.1) | 0.8 (±0.1) | 0.51 (+0.23/−0.13) | AD 1896 (?) | ||
| U2-C12 | U2-C13 | 3.2 (+0.5/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.2) | 1.3 (+0.7/−0.4) | |||
| U3-C12 | 1.8 (+0.3/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.2) | 0.74 (+0.41/−0.24) | ||||
| U4-C12 | 1.9 (+0.3/−0.1) | 0.7 (±0.2) | 0.65 (+0.37/−0.22) | ||||
| JTC13 (144.208°E, 39.136°N, WD: −7458 m) | |||||||
| U1-C13 | U1-C12 | 1.2 (+0.3/−0.1) | 1.6 (±0.1) | 1.2 (+0.5/−0.2) | AD 1896 (?) | ||
| U2-C13 | U2-C12 | 6.3 (+0.9/−0.1) | 2.2 (±0.3) | 8.3 (+2.7/−1.3) | |||
| JTC14 (144.204°E, 39.248°N, WD: −7462 m) | |||||||
| NaN | 0.2 (+0.1/−0.1) | 23.8 (±0.5) | 4.8 (+0.1/−0.1) | AD 2011 | |||
| U1-C14 | U4-C15 | 5.1 (+0.8/−0.1) | 23.3 (±1.0) | 69 (+15/−5) | |||
| JTC15 (144.219°E, 39.423°N, WD: −7523 m) | |||||||
| U1-C15 | 0.7 (+0.2/−0.1) | 12.0 (±0.4) | 5.0 (+2.0/1.3) | AD 2011 | |||
| U2-C15 | 3.3 (+0.5/−0.1) | 12.9 (±0.7) | 28 (+7/−3) | ||||
| U3-C15 | 3.1 (+0.5/−0.1) | 11.0 (±0.7) | 24 (+6/−3) | ||||
| U4-C15 | U1-C14 | 3.8 (+0.6/−0.1) | 10.9 (±0.7) | 35 (+8/−3) | |||
| U5-C15 | 1.7 (+0.3/−0.1) | 8.9 (±0.6) | 10.1 (+3.2/−1.5) | ||||
| U6-C15 | 5.4 (+0.8/−0.1) | 8.7 (±0.6) | 25 (+6/−3) | ||||
Longitude, latitude and water depth (WD) of modern depocenter, acoustically transparent SBP body units, correlation to neighboring SBP units inferred by DTW, maximum thicknesses, areal extents and volumes of identified event deposits, estimated ages from cores, and possible links to historically known large earthquakes at a given trench fill-basin in the central Japan Trench.
The properties for the AD 2011 event are from
At the basins JTC02 and JTC04, two acoustically transparent bodies (U1-C02 and U2-C02; U1-C04 and U2-C04) were identified in SBP data (Figure 3B). The sediment core GeoB16431-1 from the basin JTC02 documents thick (up to 1.5 m) fining-upward turbidite units exhibiting cross- and parallel-laminated sand-to-silt layer and a tephra layer (To-a tephra; AD 915) interbedded within bioturbated diatomaceous mud with a distinct erosional basal contact (Figures 5, 6;
Despite reduced connectivity of basins along the central Japan Trench, our correlation suggests that several of the younger acoustically transparent deposits in a given trench-fill basin correlate well to respective deposits in its neighboring basins (Figure 7). For example, the acoustically transparent bodies U1-C02/U1-C04 and U2-C02/U2-C02 in the basin JTC02/JTC04 were correlated to corresponding acoustically transparent bodies throughout the basins JTC01 and JTC06–JTC11 (e.g., U2-C06/U2-C11 and U3-C06/U3-C11).
The deeper subsurface event stratigraphy in basins JTC01–JTC06 is mostly masked by unresolvable event-deposit thicknesses (e.g., JTC05; see above) or complex subsurface deformation structures (e.g., JTC02 comprising the area with described slump and co-seismic displacement into the trench (
Northern Japan Trench
The seafloor of the trench axis in the northern Japan Trench ranges between water depth of 7,400 and 7,620 m (Figure 3C). Most of the SBP data in the northern Japan Trench clearly imaged laterally continuous reflection signals down to 40–90 ms TWT (∼30–75 m) below the seafloor in the trench-fill basins, with the exception of basin JTN01, where the acoustic signal was strongly attenuated by a shallow subsurface body with hummocky surface, possibly linked to a mass-transport complex (Figure 3C). The SBP data imaged several acoustically transparent bodies of <1 to ∼15 ms TWT thick (Figure 4). We identified eight isolated trench-fill basins (JTN01–JTN08) in the northern Japan Trench that comprise 1–5 event deposits clearly imaged in SBP data (Table 3 and Figure 3C). Unlike in the other parts of the trench, the uppermost acoustic unit immediately below seafloor is either absent or not resolved (JTN01 and JTN05), or thin (0.6–1.4 m thickness) throughout all the SBP images in the northern Japan Trench.
TABLE 3
| Basin | SBP Unit | Correlation inferred | Maximum | Area (km2) | Volume (×106 m3) | Age estimated | Possible link to known |
| by DTW | thickness (m) | from cores | large earthquakes | ||||
| Northern Japan Trench | |||||||
| JTN01 (144.233°E, 39.571°N, WD: −7493 m) | |||||||
| U1-N01 | U2-N02 | 5.7 (+0.9/−0.1) | 1.4 (±0.1) | 5.3 (+1.4/−0.6) | |||
| U2-N01 | U3-N02 | 4.2 (+0.7/−0.1) | 1.1 (±0.2) | 3.5 (+1.4/−0.8) | |||
| JTN02 (144.246°E, 39.648°N, WD: −7491 m) | |||||||
| U1-N02 | U1-N03 | 0.6 (+0.2/−0.1) | 2.9 (±0.2) | 1.3 (+0.6/−0.4) | AD 1968/1896 (?) | ||
| U2-N02 | U1-N01 | 2.8 (+0.5/−0.1) | 2.9 (±0.3) | 6.4 (+2.1/−1.0) | |||
| U3-N02 | U2-N01 | 3.7 (+0.6/−0.1) | 2.5 (±0.3) | 6.8 (+2.2/−1.1) | |||
| U4-N02 | 2.0 (+0.4/−0.1) | 2.2 (±0.3) | 2.5 (+1.0/−0.5) | ||||
| JTN03 (144.275°E, 39.777°N, WD: −7484 m) | |||||||
| U1-N03 | U1-N02 | 1.4 (+0.3/−0.1) | 6.6 (±0.3) | 5.6 (+1.8/−0.9) | AD 1968/1896 (?) | ||
| U2-N03 | U1-N05 | 8.4 (+1.2/−0.1) | 8.4 (±0.6) | 40 (+10/−4) | 2–3 century AD | ||
| U3-N03 | 2.0 (+0.4/−0.1) | 2.6 (±0.3) | 2.8 (+1.1/−0.6) | ||||
| U4-N03 | 6.3 (+0.9/−0.1) | 3.0 (±0.4) | 11 (+3/−2) | ||||
| JTN04 (144.295°E, 39.979°N, WD: −7517 m) | |||||||
| U1-N04 | U1-N03 | 1.0 (+0.2/−0.1) | 1.6 (±0.1) | 1.0 (+0.4/−0.2) | AD 1968/1896 (?) | ||
| JTN05 (144.338°E, 40.137°N, WD: −7572 m) | |||||||
| U1-N05 | U2-N08 | 9.6 (+1.4/−0.1) | 23.3 (±1.0) | 158 (+31/−9) | 2–3 century AD | ||
| U2-N05 | U4-N08 | 2.1 (+0.4/−0.1) | 20.8 (±0.9) | 23 (+7/−3) | |||
| U3-N05 | U5-N08 | 8.1 (+1.2/−0.1) | 12.7 (±0.7) | 69 (+15/−5) | |||
| JTN06 (144.355°E, 40.174°N, WD: −7508 m) | |||||||
| U1-N06 | 5.6 (+0.9/−0.1) | 4.0 (±0.4) | 9.1 (+2.8/−1.3) | ||||
| JTN07 (144.401°E, 40.325°N, WD: −7609 m) | |||||||
| U1-N07 | U1-N08 | 0.7 (+0.2/−0.1) | 7.0 (±0.3) | 2.2 (+1.2/−0.8) | AD 1968/1896 (?) | ||
| U2-N07 | U2-N08 | 6.5 (+1.0/−0.1) | 7.6 (±0.6) | 31 (+8/−3) | 2–3 century AD | ||
| U3-N07 | U3-N08 | 3.4 (+0.5/−0.1) | 5.5 (±0.5) | 9.2 (+2.8/−1.3) | |||
| JTN08 (144.408°E, 40.399°N, WD: −7623 m) | |||||||
| U1-N08 | U1-N07 | 0.8 (+0.2/−0.1) | 12.6 (±0.4) | 4.8 (+2.3/−1.4) | AD 1968/1896 | AD 1968/1896 (?) | |
| U2-N08 | U2-N07 | 11.1 (+1.6/−0.1) | 25.7 (±1.0) | 184 (+36/−10) | 1.62 (+0.49/−0.31) ka | 2–3 century AD | |
| U3-N08 | U3-N07 | 1.5 (+0.3/−0.1) | 13.2 (±0.7) | 9.9 (+3.5/−1.8) | 7.96 (+2.15/−1.15) ka | ||
| U4-N08 | U2-N05 | 2.3 (+0.4/−0.1) | 12.5 (±0.7) | 15 (+4/−2) | 10.77 (+2.89/−1.56) ka | ||
| U5-N08 | U3-N05 | 5.8 (+0.9/−0.1) | 13.2 (±0.7) | 51 (+12/−4) | 12.70 (+3.40/−1.87) ka | ||
Longitude, latitude and water depth (WD) of modern depocenter, acoustically transparent SBP body units, correlation to neighboring SBP units inferred by DTW, maximum thicknesses, areal extents and volumes of identified event deposits, estimated ages from cores, and possible links to historically known large earthquakes at a given trench fill-basin in the northern Japan Trench.
At the northernmost basin JTN08, where flow accumulation is highest in the entire Japan Trench (Figure 2), five acoustically transparent bodies (U1-N08, U2-N08, …, U5-N08) were identified in SBP data (Figures 3C, 4). Visual core description and magnetic susceptibility data (
Bulk OC 14C data of bioturbated sediments overlying the homogenous diatomaceous mud within the core GeoB21817 indicate a mean sedimentation rate of 1.17 (+0.16/-0.12) m/kyr for background sedimentation in the basin JTN08 (Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure S2), which is lower than that in the southernmost basin JTS01 [5.44 (+0.13/-0.09) m/kyr; this study] and upper 2.5 mbsf of JTC02 in the central Japan Trench (∼2.0 m/kyr;
Discussion
We have studied, for the first time to our knowledge, the spatio-temporal distribution of thick sediment remobilization event deposits resolved by high-resolution subbottom profiling data of trench basins in the Japan Trench along and across its entire axis from 36.0°N to 40.5°N. In the uppermost 5–10 m subsurface depth of the acoustically imaged sedimentary sequences in the trench basins, SBP data interpretation is validated by sedimentological data and age constraints from several cores retrieved by conventional gravity and piston coring campaigns. SBP-to-core correlation demonstrates that most of the acoustically transparent bodies identified in SBP data represent event deposits composed of homogenous diatomaceous mud resulting from widespread sediment remobilization of unconsolidated surface sediments and link to the occurrence of major historical earthquakes (see green bodies and their stratigraphically correlated event deposits shown in Figure 7). For the deeper subsurface, our event-stratigraphy interpretation is solely based on acoustic facies interpretation, seismic stratigraphic mapping and correlation, and awaits further constraints and validation by deeper coring, that is planned to by conducted by the upcoming International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 386 in 2020 (
Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Event Deposits and Links to Past Earthquake Histories
Below, we first discuss the temporal and spatial extent of the earthquake-triggered event deposits found from SBP data with a focus on (i) testing how areal extent of event deposition in the trench links to rupture area and size distributions of historically documented large earthquakes and (ii) discussing possible earthquake scenarios for prehistoric events inferred from the sedimentary record. Our results reveal distinctly different event stratigraphies for the trench segments between north and south of the area characterized by the bathymetric high and the area affected by complicated structures such as petit spot volcanism between 39.0° and 39.5°N (
Southern and South-Central Part of the Japan Trench
At the southernmost basin JTS01 in the southern Japan Trench, our SBP data document event deposits over the past ∼7 kyr. Funneling and focusing of the density flows through the proximal Nakaminato submarine canyon (Figure 1) transports larger amount of sediments into this basin than most other basins, as suggested by very high flow accumulation values (Figure 2) and high background sedimentation rates (Supplementary Figure S3). Based on our new age constraints from radiocarbon-dated background sedimentation rates and event-deposit basin-to-basin correlation, we document an event deposit of AD 1671 (+44/-52), recorded only in the southern-most trench basins JTS01–JTS05, which is interpreted to relate to the AD 1677 Mw8.3–8.6 Empo Boso-oki earthquake. The inferred rupture of this earthquake did not propagate much further north than the area drained by the Nakaminato canyon, suggesting a good fit between the mapped spatial distributions of its event deposits with the inferred rupture area (Figure 1;
Between the AD 2011 and the inferred AD 1677 event deposits, SBP data of the southernmost trench basin JTS01 evidence another sediment remobilization event with very limited spatial extend (only recorded in JTS01) that we date to AD 1846 (+22/-25). No major historical earthquake was reported within this time period. If we were to consider that dating uncertainties from a linearly extrapolating sedimentation rate from bulk organic radiocarbon data might have been underestimated (e.g., deviation of 14C age at 215 cm of GeoB21804 core; Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure S2), this event deposit might be related to either the AD 1793 February M7.6–8.2 Kansei, the AD 1896 January M7.3 Ibaraki-oki, or the AD 1897 August M7.7 Sanriku-oki earthquakes, which are all smaller earthquakes that have affected the source area of the JTS01 basin. However, we trust the age constraints and uncertainty estimates of the event deposit and, alternatively, interpret that such a locally recorded event deposit is not indicative for earthquake trigger. Indeed, the event deposit could also have been triggered by the AD 1856 Edo-Ansei typhoon that is known for the strongest typhoon within this possible time range (
Remarkably, our results reveal that the thick event deposit (U4-S01) in the southernmost trench basin JTS01, as validated by a core and dated to AD 980 (+78/-157), correlates widely to acoustically transparent bodies within most of the basins in the southern Japan Trench and throughout basins JTC01–JTC11 in the central Japan Trench (Figure 7). Hence, this event deposit is extensively distributed in the trench-fill basins throughout the southern Japan Trench and its spatial extent reaches northward up to the major bathymetric divide in the central Japan Trench at ∼39.0°N. As independently evidenced and dated from cores in the basins JTS15, JTS16, JTC02, JTC04, and JTC07 (
Spatio-temporal mapping and basin-to-basin correlation of the other major historical earthquake (i.e., the AD 1454 Mw≥8.4 Kyotoku earthquake), which triggered sediment remobilization and event deposition in the central part of the Japan Trench (
With respect to discussing possible earthquake scenarios for prehistoric earthquakes, our spatio-temporal event stratigraphy for the area south of 39.0°N reveals the most promising data from the deep subsurface of the basins JTS01, JTS15, and JTC07–JTC11. The 2.3 (+0.4/-0.2) ka event deposit identified in the basin JTS15 is probably related to the 2.4–2.6 ka earthquake that has been inferred from a tsunami deposit reported along the coast between the northern Fukushima and southern Miyagi Prefectures (e.g.,
Northern Japan Trench
North of 39.5°N, as compared to the southern and central Japan Trench, we found distinctly different stratigraphic successions characterized by lower sedimentation rates and fewer but thicker event deposits. We interpret that the uppermost very thin homogenous deposits imaged immediately below the seafloor reflection in the basins JTN02, JTN03, JTN04, JTN07, and JTN08 must relate to a very recent event, possibly either the AD 1968 Mw8.2–8.3 Tokachi-oki (Sanriku-oki Hokubu) earthquake or AD 1896 Mw8.0–8.4 Meiji Sanriku earthquake. These earthquakes were smaller in size than 2011 earthquake, which may explain that the resulting event deposits and total remobilized sediment volume are much smaller than those for the recent 2011 event found in the southern and central Japan Trench (
The SBP data in the northern Japan Trench document very thick acoustically transparent bodies up to 11.1 (+1.6/-0.1) m. One of the thick event deposits, tentatively dated to 1.62 (+0.49/-0.31) ka in the JTN08 basin, is widely distributed in the basins JTN03, JTN05, JTN07, and JTN08 (Figure 7). Tsunami deposits of a 2nd–3rd Century large earthquake have been widely correlated along the Iwate coast between Yamada and Hirono Towns (
Export of Organic Carbon (OC) to the Hadal Trench by Large Earthquakes
Having revealed spatial and temporal distribution of event deposits, we can quantify sediment volumes and OC contents of given event deposits linked to large earthquakes throughout the entire Japan Trench. The AD 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake made spatially widespread remobilization of young surficial seafloor slope sediments and delivered event deposits of at least 0.187 (+0.045/-0.018) km3 to the trench (
FIGURE 8

(A) Relationship between volume of event deposit and modern water depth of depocenter at a given trench-fill basin. (B) Relationship between volume of event deposit and modern flow accumulation of modern depocenter at a given trench-fill basin. Red, orange, and blue plots represent the basins in the southern, central, and northern Japan Trench, respectively. Cross, circle, triangle, square, pentagon, inverted triangle, and hexagon plots represent the volumes of SBP units U1 (and uppermost deposits “NaN” in Table 2), U2, U3, U4, U5, U6, and U7, respectively. The data with volumes less than 0.3 × 106 m3 are not shown.
By calculating the AD 2011 event-deposit total sediment volume and measuring OC content within the event deposits,
We have also documented event deposits older than those related to the AD 869 and 2nd–3rd century earthquakes in the entire Japan Trench. We would thus expect similarly large quantities of OC supply to the trench by older large earthquakes perhaps throughout the Holocene, which could also influence the benthic communities at the hadal trench through the intensified supply of organic matter, but reserve final judgment for the future when further constraints are available from the upcoming IODP expedition. Nevertheless, the virtually instantaneous supply of OC to the hadal trench driven by large earthquakes brings the majority of OC burial and carbon sequestration via eventual underthrusting on geological time scales. The hadal trench can thus be considered as a sink for global OC, which could account for several of the missing OC in global budget. It yet remains open to understand how much the buried OC accounts for being recycled by anaerobic degradation, being buried deep to be methanized (
Conclusion
We have studied detailed event stratigraphy in an entire hadal trench for the first time to our knowledge, by integrating high-resolution bathymetry and highly dense dm-scale vertical resolution subbottom profiler (SBP) data, and sediment cores acquired during 2012–2018 over the entire hadal trench axis of the Japan Trench (36.0°–40.5°N). We identify 39 isolated trench-fill basins along the trench axis of the Japan Trench that contain a total of 115 individual SBP-resolvable acoustically transparent event deposits, documenting sediment remobilization of mostly diatomaceous mud. Spatio-temporal mapping and basin-to-basin correlation of the identified event deposits, along with SBP-to-core correlation and dating of cores retrieved from the upper parts of ∼10 m below the seafloor reveals that widely correlatable event deposits link to major historic large earthquakes such as the AD 2011 Tohoku-oki, AD 1454 Kyotoku, and AD 869 Jogan events.
Comparison between the areal extent of event deposits with inferred rupture areas and magnitude of the respective historical earthquakes suggests that our Japan Trench submarine paleoseismological approach can be used to roughly constrain areal extent of past M8+ earthquakes. Our data also suggest that only such large earthquakes trigger spatially extensive sediment remobilization that results in SBP-resolvable, thick event deposits across several trench-basins with different upslope flow network conditions. For these events, we could at least clearly separate smaller events from the event-stratigraphic record (exclusively for the southernmost trench basins) that link to M∼8.5 type earthquakes along the southernmost segment, and repeating spatially extensive large to giant (M8.4–9.1) earthquakes in the linked southern and central part of the Japan. However, detailed comparison between event-deposit distributions and rupture areas reported from literature also reveals that the two do not perfectly match. This highlights that large knowledge gaps remain in reconstructing rupture areas of past earthquakes, in understanding exact areal and subsurface-depth threshold conditions for earthquake induced surficial sediment remobilization, as well as in linking areal distribution and volume of remobilized sediment to earthquake parameters.
The lower part of the SBP data also documents several thick acoustically transparent bodies possibly dating back to the early and middle Holocene. Our results provide quantitative constraints of along-strike variation of sediment volumes redistributed by these episodic events along the entire trench axis. We find that the total volumes of event deposits triggered by the AD 869 Jogan and the prehistoric 2–3 century AD earthquakes are comparative to or even larger than that by the AD 2011 Mw 9.0–9.1 Tohoku-oki earthquake. Finally, we present a first-ever trench-wide quantification of OC translocation driven by these large earthquakes. We conclude that, at least 7 Tg of OC remobilized from surficial slope seafloor sediments was exported to the hadal Japan Trench axis in the last 2,000 years by large earthquakes. This highlights the significance of seismo-tectonic events for the long-term carbon cycle in hadal trenches.
Statements
Data availability statement
Bathymetric data used in the paper are available at Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (https://www.bsh.de/DE/DATEN/Ozeanographisches_Datenzentrum/Vermessungsdaten/Nordpazifischer_Ozean/nordpazifik_node.html) and JAMSTEC-DARWIN database (http://www.godac.jamstec.go.jp/darwin/e). All the other datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
MS and AK projected the study. AK analyzed all the data, created the figures, and drafted the manuscript. TS performed radiocarbon dating measurements and prepared Figure 5. KI provided radiographs of cores. All authors contributed to the acquisitions of data, discussion to this study, and provided feedback on the manuscript.
Funding
The R/V Sonne cruises were supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and German Research Foundation (DFG). The R/V Shinsei-Maru cruises were supported by Japan Agency of Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) and Joint Usage/Research Center for Atmosphere and Ocean Science at the Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF-P29678).
Acknowledgments
The authors highly appreciate the effort of shipboard scientists and staffs of the R/V Sonne cruises SO251 Leg 1 and SO219A Leg 2, and R/V Shinsei-maru cruises KS-18-10, KS-17-13, KS-16-14, KS-15-16, KS-15-3, and KS-14-16 to acquire the data used in this work. The authors are also immensely grateful to the editor MC and the two reviewers for their valuable comments which significantly improved the quality and clarity of this manuscript. Processing and interpretation of SBP data were done helpfully using IHS Markit Kingdom software (educational grant program), CWP/SU (
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2019.00319/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbmaR.KabirN. (2006). 3D interpolation of irregular data with a POCS algorithm.Geophysics71E91–E97. 10.1190/1.2356088
2
AraiK.InoueT.IkeharaK.SasakiT. (2014). Episodic subsidence and active deformation of the forearc slope along the Japan trench near the epicenter of the 2011 tohoku earthquake.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.4089–15. 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.09.048
3
AraiK.NaruseH.MiuraR.KawamuraK.HinoR.ItoY.et al (2013). Tsunami-generated turbidity current of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.Geology411195–1198. 10.1130/G34777.1
4
BaoR.StrasserM.McNicholA. P.HaghipourN.McIntyreC.WeferG.et al (2018). Tectonically-triggered sediment and carbon export to the Hadal zone.Nat. Commun.9:121. 10.1038/s41467-017-02504-1
5
BernerR. A. (1982). Burial of organic carbon and pyrite sulfur in the modern ocean; its geochemical and environmental significance.Am. J. Sci.282451–473. 10.2475/ajs.282.4.451
6
BirdP. (2003). An updated digital model of plate boundaries.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.4:1027. 10.1029/2001GC000252
7
BostonB.MooreG. F.NakamuraY.KodairaS. (2017). Forearc slope deformation above the Japan Trench megathrust: implications for subduction erosion.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.46226–34. 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.01.005
8
BurdigeD. J. (2007). Preservation of organic matter in marine sediments: controls, mechanisms, and an imbalance in sediment organic carbon budgets?Chem. Rev.107467–485. 10.1021/cr050347q
9
CadetJ. P.KobayashiK.LallemandS.JolivetL.AubouinJ.BoulegueJ.et al (1987). Deep scientific dives in the Japan and Kuril Trenches.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.83313–328. 10.1016/0012-821X(87)90074-4
10
ChenY.ZhangL.MoL.-W. (2015). Seismic data interpolation using nonlinear shaping regularization.J. Seism. Explor.24327–342.
11
ChesterF. M.RoweC.UjiieK.KirkpatrickJ.RegallaC.RemittiF.et al (2013). Structure and composition of the plate-boundary slip zone for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake.Science3421208–1211. 10.1126/science.1243719
12
CliftP.VannucchiP. (2004). Controls on tectonic accretion versus erosion in subduction zones: implications for the origin and recycling of the continental crust.Rev. Geophys.42:RG2001. 10.1029/2003RG000127
13
CliftP. D. (2017). A revised budget for Cenozoic sedimentary carbon subduction.Rev. Geophys.5597–125. 10.1002/2016RG000531
14
CohenJ. K.StockwellJ. W.Jr. (2015). CWP/SU: Seismic Un∗x Release No. 44: An Open Source Software Package for Seismic Research and Processing.Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines.
15
DanovaroR.Della CroceN.Dell’AnnoA.PuscedduA. (2003). A depocenter of organic matter at 7800m depth in the SE Pacific Ocean.Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap.501411–1420. 10.1016/j.dsr.2003.07.001
16
DaubechiesI.DefriseM.De MolC. (2004). An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint.Commun. Pure Appl. Math.571413–1457. 10.1002/cpa.20042
17
D’HondtS.RutherfordS.SpivackA. J. (2002). Metabolic activity of subsurface life in deep-sea sediments.Science2952067–2070. 10.1126/science.1064878
18
FomelS.SavaP.VladI.LiuY.BashkardinV. (2013). Madagascar: open-source software project for multidimensional data analysis and reproducible computational experiments.J. Open Res. Softw.1:e8. 10.5334/jors.ag
19
FujiwaraT.dos Santos FerreiraC.BachmannA. K.StrasserM.WeferG.SunT.et al (2017). Seafloor displacement after the 2011 Tohoku-oki Earthquake in the Northern Japan trench examined by repeated bathymetric surveys.Geophys. Res. Lett.44833–839. 10.1002/2017GL075839
20
FujiwaraT.KodairaS.NoT.KaihoY.TakahashiN.KanedaY. (2011). The 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: displacement reaching the trench axis.Science334:1240. 10.1126/science.1211554
21
GludR. N.WenzhöferF.MiddelboeM.OguriK.TurnewitschR.CanfieldD. E.et al (2013). High rates of microbial carbon turnover in sediments in the deepest oceanic trench on Earth.Nat. Geosci.6284–288. 10.1038/ngeo1773
22
GoldfingerC. (2011). Submarine paleoseismology based on turbidite records.Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.335–66. 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142852
23
GotoT.SatakeK.SugaiT.IshibeT.HaradaT.GusmanA. R. (2019). Tsunami history over the past 2000 years on the Sanriku coast, Japan, determined using gravel deposits to estimate tsunami inundation behavior.Sediment. Geol.38285–102. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2019.01.001
24
HirakawaK. (2012). Outsize tsunami sediments since last years along the Japan- and Kuril-Trench: a tentative idea on source and supercycle.Kagaku82172–181.
25
HiranoN.TakahashiE.YamamotoJ.AbeN.IngleS. P.KaneokaI.et al (2006). Volcanism in response to plate flexure.Science3131426–1428. 10.1126/science.1128235
26
Hydrographic and Oceanographic Department Japan Coast Guard, and JAMSTEC, (2011). Compilation of Tohoku-oki bathymetric data before the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake.Seismol. Soc. Jpn News Lett.2335–36. 10.1038/ncomms14044
27
IdeS.BaltayA.BerozaG. C. (2011). Shallow dynamic overshoot and energetic deep rupture in the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake.Science3321426–1429. 10.1126/science.1207020
28
IkeharaK.KanamatsuT.NagahashiY.StrasserM.FinkH.UsamiK.et al (2016). Documenting large earthquakes similar to the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake from sediments deposited in the Japan Trench over the past 1500 years.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.44548–56. 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.04.009
29
IkeharaK.UsamiK.KanamatsuT.AraiK.YamaguchiA.FukuchiR. (2018). Spatial variability in sediment lithology and sedimentary processes along the Japan Trench: use of deep-sea turbidite records to reconstruct past large earthquakes.Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ.45675–89. 10.1144/SP456.9
30
IshimuraD.MiyauchiT. (2015). Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits during the last 4000 years and their correlations with historical tsunami events in Koyadori on the Sanriku Coast, northeastern Japan.Prog. Earth Planet. Sci.2:16. 10.1186/s40645-015-0047-4
31
JamiesonA. J.FujiiT.MayorD. J.SolanM.PriedeI. G. (2010). Hadal trenches: the ecology of the deepest places on Earth.Trends Ecol. Evol.25190–197. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.09.009
32
JonesD. O. B.YoolA.WeiC.-L.HensonS. A.RuhlH. A.WatsonR. A.et al (2014). Global reductions in seafloor biomass in response to climate change.Glob. Chang. Biol.201861–1872. 10.1111/gcb.12480
33
KanamatsuT.UsamiK.McHughC. M. G.IkeharaK. (2017). High-resolution chronology of sediment below CCD based on Holocene paleomagnetic secular variations in the Tohoku-oki earthquake rupture zone.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.182990–3002. 10.1002/2017GC006878
34
KanamoriH. (1971). Seismological evidence for a lithospheric normal faulting — the Sanriku earthquake of 1933.Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.4289–300. 10.1016/0031-9201(71)90013-6
35
KanamoriH. (1972). Mechanism of tsunami earthquakes.Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.6346–359. 10.1016/0031-9201(72)90058-1
36
KanamoriH. (1977). The energy release in great earthquakes.J. Geophys. Res.822981–2987. 10.1029/JB082i020p02981
37
KawahataH.IshizakiY.KuroyanagiA.SuzukiA.OhkushiK. (2017). Quantitative reconstruction of temperature at a Jômon site in the Incipient Jômon Period in northern Japan and its implications for the production of early pottery and stone arrowheads.Quat. Sci. Rev.15766–79. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.12.009
38
KawamuraK.SasakiT.KanamatsuT.SakaguchiA.OgawaY. (2012). Large submarine landslides in the Japan Trench: a new scenario for additional tsunami generation.Geophys. Res. Lett.39:L05308. 10.1029/2011GL050661
39
KerrickD. M. (2001). Present and past nonanthropogenic CO2 degassing from the solid earth.Rev. Geophys.39565–585. 10.1029/2001RG000105
40
KiokaA.SchwestermannT.MoernautJ.IkeharaK.KanamatsuT.McHughC. M.et al (2019). Megathrust earthquake drives drastic organic carbon supply to the hadal trench.Sci. Rep.9:1553. 10.1038/s41598-019-38834-x
41
KodairaS.NakamuraY.YamamotoY.ObanaK.FujieG.NoT.et al (2017). Depth-varying structural characters in the rupture zone of the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake.Geosphere131408–1424. 10.1130/GES01489.1
42
KodairaS.NoT.NakamuraY.FujiwaraT.KaihoY.MiuraS.et al (2012). Coseismic fault rupture at the trench axis during the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake.Nat. Geosci.5646–650. 10.1038/ngeo1547
43
KogeH.FujiwaraT.KodairaS.SasakiT.KamedaJ.KitamuraY.et al (2014). Friction properties of the plate boundary megathrust beneath the frontal wedge near the Japan Trench: an inference from topographic variation.Earth Planets Space66:153. 10.1186/s40623-014-0153-3
44
KusumotoS.GotoT.SugaiT.OmoriT.SatakeK. (2018). Geological evidence of tsunamis in the past 3800 years at a coastal lowland in the Central Fukushima Prefecture, Japan.Mar. Geol.404137–146. 10.1016/j.margeo.2018.07.004
45
LallemandS. E.SchnürleP.MalavieilleJ. (1994). Coulomb theory applied to accretionary and nonaccretionary wedges: possible causes for tectonic erosion and/or frontal accretion.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth9912033–12055. 10.1029/94JB00124
46
LayT.KanamoriH.AmmonC. J.NettlesM.WardS. N.AsterR. C.et al (2005). The great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004.Science3081127–1133. 10.1126/science.1112250
47
LeducD.RowdenA. A.GludR. N.WenzhöferF.KitazatoH.ClarkM. R. (2016). Comparison between infaunal communities of the deep floor and edge of the Tonga Trench: possible effects of differences in organic matter supply.Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap.116264–275. 10.1016/j.dsr.2015.11.003
48
LovelessJ. P.MeadeB. J. (2010). Geodetic imaging of plate motions, slip rates, and partitioning of deformation in Japan.J. Geophys. Res.115:B02410. 10.1029/2008JB006248
49
MacInnesB. T.WeissR.BourgeoisJ.PineginaT. K. (2010). Slip distribution of the 1952 Kamchatka Great earthquake based on near-field tsunami deposits and historical records.Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.1001695–1709. 10.1785/0120090376
50
McHughC. M.KanamatsuT.SeeberL.BoppR.CormierM.-H.UsamiK. (2016). Remobilization of surficial slope sediment triggered by the A.D. 2011 Mw 9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and tsunami along the Japan Trench.Geology44391–394. 10.1130/G37650.1
51
McIntyreC. P.WackerL.HaghipourN.BlattmannT. M.FahrniS.UsmanM.et al (2017). Online 13C and 14C gas measurements by EA-IRMS–AMS at ETH Zürich.Radiocarbon59893–903. 10.1017/RDC.2016.68
52
MoernautJ.Van DaeleM.FontijnK.HeirmanK.KempfP.PinoM.et al (2018). Larger earthquakes recur more periodically: new insights in the megathrust earthquake cycle from lacustrine turbidite records in south-central Chile.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.4819–19. 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.016
53
MolenaarA.MoernautJ.WiemerG.DuboisN.StrasserM. (2019). Earthquake impact on active margins: tracing surficial remobilization and seismic strengthening in a slope sedimentary sequence.Geophys. Res. Lett.466015–6023. 10.1029/2019GL082350
54
MoriN.TakahashiT.YasudaT.YanagisawaH. (2011). Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up.Geophys. Res. Lett.38:L00G14. 10.1029/2011GL049210
55
MüllerM. (2007). Information Retrieval for Music and Motion.Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-540-74048-3
56
NagaiR.KikuchiM.YamanakaY. (2001). Comparative study on the source processes of recurrent large earthquakes in Sanriku-oki Region: the 1968 Tokachi-oki Earthquake and the 1994 Sanriku-oki Earthquake.Zisin-II54267–280. 10.4294/zisin1948.54.2_267
57
NakamuraY.KodairaS.MiuraS.RegallaC.TakahashiN. (2013). High-resolution seismic imaging in the Japan Trench axis area off Miyagi, northeastern Japan.Geophys. Res. Lett.401713–1718. 10.1002/grl.50364
58
NamegayaY.SatakeK. (2014). Reexamination of the A.D. 869 Jogan earthquake size from tsunami deposit distribution, simulated flow depth, and velocity.Geophys. Res. Lett.412297–2303. 10.1002/2013GL058678
59
NunouraT.TakakiY.HiraiM.ShimamuraS.MakabeA.KoideO.et al (2015). Hadal biosphere: insight into the microbial ecosystem in the deepest ocean on Earth.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112E1230–E1236. 10.1073/pnas.1421816112
60
O’CallaghanJ. F.MarkD. M. (1984). The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data.Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process.28323–344. 10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0
61
OguriK.KawamuraK.SakaguchiA.ToyofukuT.KasayaT.MurayamaM.et al (2013). Hadal disturbance in the Japan Trench induced by the 2011 Tohoku–Oki Earthquake.Sci. Rep.3:1915. 10.1038/srep01915
62
OkamuraY.NamegayaY. (2011). Reconstruction of the 17th century Kuril multi-segment earthquake.Annu. Rep. Act. Fault Paleoearthquake Res.1115–20.
63
PengG.BellerbyR.ZhangF.SunX.LiD. (in press). The ocean’s ultimate trashcan: hadal trenches as major depositories for plastic pollution.Water Res.168:115121. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115121
64
SakazakiT.KanoY.OhmuraJ.HattoriK. (2015). On the severe typhoon attacking edo region in 1856.Sustain. Humanosphere1164–70.
65
SakoeH.ChibaS. (1978). Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition.IEEE Trans. Acoust.2643–49. 10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163055
66
SatakeK. (2015). Geological and historical evidence of irregular recurrent earthquakes in Japan.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.373:20140375. 10.1098/rsta.2014.0375
67
SatakeK.AtwaterB. F. (2007). Long-term perspectives on giant earthquakes and tsunamis at subduction zones.Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.35349–374. 10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140302
68
SawaiY.NamegayaY.OkamuraY.SatakeK.ShishikuraM. (2012). Challenges of anticipating the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami using coastal geology.Geophys. Res. Lett.39:L21309. 10.1029/2012GL053692
69
SawaiY.NamegayaY.TamuraT.NakashimaR.TanigawaK. (2015). Shorter intervals between great earthquakes near Sendai: scour ponds and a sand layer attributable to A.D. 1454 overwash.Geophys. Res. Lett.424795–4800. 10.1002/2015GL064167
70
SchwanghartW.ScherlerD. (2014). TopoToolbox 2 – MATLAB-based software for topographic analysis and modeling in Earth surface sciences.Earth Surf. Dyn.21–7. 10.5194/esurf-2-1-2014
71
SenoT.SakuraiT.SteinS. (1996). Can the Okhotsk Plate be discriminated from the North American plate?J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth10111305–11315. 10.1029/96JB00532
72
SteinS.OkalE. A. (2005). Speed and size of the Sumatra earthquake.Nature434581–582. 10.1038/434581a
73
StrasserM.IkeharaK.CotterillC. (2019). Expedition 386 scientific prospectus: Japan trench paleoseismology.Int. Ocean Disc. Prog.3861–57. 10.14379/iodp.sp.386.2019
74
StrasserM.KollingM.FerreiraC.dosS.FinkH. G.FujiwaraT.et al (2013). A slump in the trench: tracking the impact of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.Geology41935–938. 10.1130/G34477.1
75
StrasserM.KopfA. J.et al (2017). Report and Preliminary Results of R/V SONNE Cruise SO251, Extreme Events Archived in the GEological Record of Japan’s Subduction Margins (EAGER-Japan), Leg A SO251-1, Yokohama - Yokohama, 04.10.2016 – 15.10.2016, Leg B SO251- 2, Yokohama - Yokohama, 18.10.2016 – 02.11.2016.Berichte: MARUM, 1–217.
76
SunT.WangK.FujiwaraT.KodairaS.HeJ. (2017). Large fault slip peaking at trench in the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake.Nat. Commun.8:14044. 10.1038/ncomms14044
77
TakadaK.ShishikuraM.ImaiK.EbinaY.GotoK.KoshiyaS.et al (2016). Distribution and ages of tsunami deposits along the Pacific Coast of the Iwate Prefecture.Active Fault Paleoearthq. Res.161–52.
78
TakeuchiH.FujiR.MimuraN.ImamuraF.SatakeK.TsujiY.et al (2007). Survey of run-up height of Empo Boso-oki earthquake tsunami on the coast from Chiba prefecture to Fukushima prefecture.Hist. Earthq.2253–59.
79
TaniokaY.SatakeK. (1996). Fault parameters of the 1896 Sanriku Tsunami earthquake estimated from tsunami numerical modeling.Geophys. Res. Lett.231549–1552. 10.1029/96GL01479
80
TsujiT.KawamuraK.KanamatsuT.KasayaT.FujikuraK.ItoY.et al (2013). Extension of continental crust by anelastic deformation during the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake: the role of extensional faulting in the generation of a great tsunami.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.36444–58. 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.038
81
TsujiY.UedaK. (1995). Evaluation of A.D. 1611 Keicho, A.D. 1677 Enpou, A.D. 1763 Houreki, A.D. 1793 Kansei, and A.D. 1856 Ansei Sanriku tsunamis.Hist. Earthq.1175–106.
82
TsuruT.ParkJ.-O.MiuraS.KodairaS.KidoY.HayashiT. (2002). Along-arc structural variation of the plate boundary at the Japan Trench margin: implication of interplate coupling.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth107:2357. 10.1029/2001JB001664
83
UsamiK.IkeharaK.KanamatsuT.McHughC. M. (2018). Supercycle in great earthquake recurrence along the Japan Trench over the last 4000 years.Geosci. Lett.5:11. 10.1186/s40562-018-0110-2
84
von HueneR.LallemandS. (1990). Tectonic erosion along the Japan and Peru convergent margins.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.102704–720. 10.1130/0016-76061990102<0704:TEATJA<2.3.CO;2
85
WesselP.SmithW. H. F.ScharrooR.LuisJ.WobbeF. (2013). Generic mapping tools: improved version released.Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union94409–410. 10.1002/2013EO450001
86
YanagisawaH.GotoK.SugawaraD.KanamaruK.IwamotoN.TakamoriY. (2016). Tsunami earthquake can occur elsewhere along the Japan Trench-Historical and geological evidence for the 1677 earthquake and tsunami.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth1213504–3516. 10.1002/2015JB012617
Summary
Keywords
hadal zone, event deposit, organic carbon, paleoseismology, Japan Trench
Citation
Kioka A, Schwestermann T, Moernaut J, Ikehara K, Kanamatsu T, Eglinton TI and Strasser M (2019) Event Stratigraphy in a Hadal Oceanic Trench: The Japan Trench as Sedimentary Archive Recording Recurrent Giant Subduction Zone Earthquakes and Their Role in Organic Carbon Export to the Deep Sea. Front. Earth Sci. 7:319. doi: 10.3389/feart.2019.00319
Received
15 June 2019
Accepted
18 November 2019
Published
05 December 2019
Volume
7 - 2019
Edited by
Michael Andrew Clare, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Patrick Lajeunesse, Laval University, Canada; Yvonne Therese Spychala, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2019 Kioka, Schwestermann, Moernaut, Ikehara, Kanamatsu, Eglinton and Strasser.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Arata Kioka, kioka@mine.kyushu-u.ac.jp
This article was submitted to Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Diagenesis, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.