Abstract
The Tukhum granitic pluton is a part of the Mesozoic composite Khentei batholith of north-central Mongolia, which belongs to the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. The shallow-seated pluton (∼900 km2) is made up of two distinct biotite granite intrusions dated at ∼191 and 183 Ma and hosts a tungsten deposit associated with the younger phase. Both intrusions are composed of ferroan A2-type granites, which are fractionated and silica-rich (>71 wt.%). Their mantle-normalized plots are relatively enriched in Cs, Rb, U, and Th and depleted in Ba, Sr, Eu, Nb, and Ti. They have εNd(t) ranging from ∼0 to +1 and Nd model ages ∼650–900 Ma. The granites were derived by partial melting of a Neoproterozoic middle/lower crustal source of felsic/intermediate composition, followed by fractional crystallization. The younger intrusion also contains leucogranites with a trace element composition indicative of a combined crystal and fluid fractionation. The source of this younger intrusion was enriched in rare metals (W, Sn). The tungsten deposit is associated with the last stages of the evolution of the granitic magma. The origin of the pluton as well as the Khentei batholith is related to a mantle plume, which provided the heat triggering a crustal melting. The plume resulted in the eastward movement of large-scale magmatism over time, from the Tarim traps (300–275 Ma) through the large Khangai magmatic center (270–240 Ma) to the Khentei batholith (230–180 Ma) in north-central Mongolia.
Introduction
Many tin-tungsten mineralization and deposits are spatially, temporally, and genetically associated with highly differentiated granitic intrusions worldwide (e.g., Sillitoe et al., 1975; ; ; ; ; Romer and Kroner, 2016; ). One of the regions with such an economically important association is north-central Mongolia where mineralized granitic bodies (e.g., Yarmolyuk and Kuzmin, 2012; Syritso et al., 2018) are a part of the huge Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB), which is characterized by voluminous juvenile crust unlike most Phanerozoic orogenic belts including Caledonides and Hercynides (e.g., ). This study focuses on the granites associated with a W deposit in north-central Mongolia, where the genetic relationship of the mineralization with the granites is not clear. An investigation of the petrology, geochronology, and geochemical characteristics of the granitic pluton can constrain the petrogenesis of the granitic rocks as well as the origin of the mineralization. It can also be useful for mineral exploration, particularly if it can help to distinguish between fertile and barren granites. This is an important issue as granitic intrusions of the CAOB provide large exploration targets for W-Sn mineralization. A better understanding of the geochemical characteristics and petrogenesis of the mineralized intrusions is a significant step toward developing a strategy for mineral exploration in this region. In this paper, we present whole-rock major and trace element and Nd isotopic data as well as the U-Pb zircon ages for the granitic rocks from the Tukhum pluton (TP; north-central Mongolia) and discuss their origin and tectonic settings. In addition, the paper contributes to the current discussion on the role of a mantle plume under this part of the CAOB (e.g., ; Yarmolyuk et al., 2013). The composite intrusion, situated about 100 km NW of Ulaanbaatar, hosts a tungsten deposit.
Geological Setting
The CAOB, a large accretionary orogen bounded by the Siberian craton to the west and north and the North China and Tarim cratons to the south, stretches from the Ural Mountains to the Pacific Ocean (Figure 1). It consists of numerous orogenic belts (e.g., Sengör et al., 1993; ), some of which are characterized by widespread granitoid magmatism ranging in age from the Late Precambrian to the Mesozoic. In northern Mongolia and southern Siberia, along the southern border of the Siberian craton, the CAOB contains voluminous Late Paleozoic to Mesozoic granitoid rocks including large batholiths (such as Khangai and Khentei) surrounded by Permian–Early Cretaceous rift zones (Figure 1). In north-central Mongolia, the CAOB features the Daurian-Khentei megadome or uplift, a northeast-trending bulge about 600 km long and 200 to 220 km wide that has been uplifting from the early Mesozoic to the Recent. The megadome contains mainly Paleozoic turbidites intruded by the Khentei batholith, the largest Late Triassic–Early Jurassic intrusion in north-central Mongolia. The batholith is composed of numerous Mesozoic plutons, which were emplaced between 230 and 180 Ma (Yarmolyuk et al., 2013; this paper). The individual plutons vary in composition from granodiorite to leucogranite with minor amounts of gabbro and diorite as well as small bodies of Li-F-rich granite occurring along the margins of the batholith. Some of the Li-F-rich granites host the W-Sn mineralization. The intrusions of the megadome show a concentrically zoned arrangement (Figure 2) where the Khentei batholith is in the center of the bulge and is surrounded by three rift zones: Western Transbaikalian, Kharkhorin (Karakorum), and North Gobi. The rift zones consist of horsts, grabens, and depressions containing Upper Permian to Upper Triassic clastic sedimentary rocks and bimodal volcanic suites (Yarmolyuk et al., 2002) and Mesozoic granitic plutons (e.g., , ; ). The age of the plutons of the rift zones range typically between 221 and 186 Ma (Yarmolyuk et al., 2002; ).
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

Geologic map of the Daurian-Khentei megadome or uplift composed of the Early Mesozoic Khentei batholith, North Gobi, Kharkorin, and Western Transbaikalian rifts (modified after Yarmolyuk and Kuzmin, 2011, 2012). TP—Tukham pluton; BU—Bayan-Ulan pluton.
The rift zones and adjoining marginal parts of the Khentei batholith host mineralized granites. One of such plutons in north-central Mongolia is the TP which hosts a tungsten deposit (Tsagaan Davaa). Unlike some weakly mineralized granitic bodies such as Janchivlan and Avdar (
FIGURE 3

Geological map of the southeastern part of the Tukhum pluton and surrounding units (modified after
An unusual structure of the Daurian-Khentei megadome is not unique in the area. A large magmatic complex with a zonal concentric structure similar to that of the Khentei batholith occurs southwest of the study area (Figure 1). This Permian–Early Triassic body of comparable size consists of a granitoid core surrounded by rift zones (Yarmolyuk et al., 2008, 2013; Yarmolyuk and Kuzmin, 2011, 2012). The core of the structure, the Khangai batholith (>120,000 km2), is composed mainly of granites and granodiorites emplaced between 270 and 240 Ma (Yarmolyuk et al., 2013). It lies between the Gobi-Altai and Northern Mongolian rift zones, which are similar to those around the Khentei batholith.
Petrography
The pluton is composed mainly of fine- to coarse-grained biotite granites (Figure 4) and is composed of two intrusive phases (Figure 3). The first phase (including dated sample WOL-12) is made up of gray and yellowish gray fine- to medium-grained porphyritic granite with feldspar phenocrysts typically 1–3 cm in size that are enclosed in a groundmass composed of K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, and subordinate biotite (up to ∼10%). Amphibole, Fe-Ti oxides, secondary minerals (including carbonates), and accessory minerals occur in trace amounts. Phenocrysts, which are microcline-perthite and subordinate plagioclase, account for about 25% of the volume of the rocks. This intrusive phase contains numerous xenoliths of country rocks, particularly metasedimentary rocks. The second intrusive phase (encompassing dated samples WOL-14 and WOL-15) includes dominant porphyritic coarse-grained biotite granite and subordinate leucogranite. Porphyritic biotite granite contains feldspar phenocrysts, which are also mainly microcline-perthite and subordinate plagioclase. The groundmass is made up of plagioclase, microcline, quartz, and minor biotite and accessory minerals (titanite, zircon, Fe-Ti oxides, and pyrite). The rocks also contain minor but variable amounts of secondary minerals (chlorite, sericite, and carbonate). Compared to the rocks of the first phase, these granites have notably larger grain size. The leucogranite is composed of plagioclase (albite, albite-oligoclase), K-feldspar, quartz, secondary, and accessory minerals. These rocks mostly form bands ranging in width from a few meters to ∼100 m, which pass gradationally into the biotite granite. Some leucogranites contain dominantly primary magmatic mineral assemblages while other leucogranites, namely, those that are close to the mineralization, were affected by silicification and other alteration processes such as greisenization (quartz, dark mica, and minor fluorite). We have subdivided the altered leucogranites into moderately altered and strongly altered. Moderately altered leucogranites typically contain secondary quartz and smaller amounts of Li-bearing mica, fluorite and topaz, while the strongly altered rocks are composed mainly of a secondary mineral assemblage. It is possible that precursors of some of these strongly altered rocks were biotite granites. Porphyritic biotite granite of the second phase and leucogranite are assumed to be approximately coeval (also, e.g.,
FIGURE 4

Photo showing a typical outcrop of the biotite granite of the Tukhum pluton (photo courtesy of Yo. Majigsuren).
Tungsten Mineralization
The Tsagaan Davaa tungsten deposit (
Analytical Methods
Whole-Rock Analyses
The analyses of whole-rock major and trace elements of the TP samples (Table 1) were done using lithium metaborate–tetraborate fusion at the Activation Laboratories Ltd. in Ancaster, ON, Canada. Major elements were analyzed by an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer, whereas trace elements were determined by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS; Perkin Elmer Optima 3000). The accuracy for each element was monitored by analyzing international standards, which were run as unknown. Based on replicate analyses, the precision is generally better than 3% for most major elements and between 5 and 10% for trace elements. Major and some trace elements in the Bayan-Ulan samples (Supplementary Table S2) were determined by X-ray fluorescence at the Regional Geochemical Center at Saint Mary’s University. Analytical precision as determined on replicate analyses is generally better than 5% for the major oxides and between 5% and 10% for minor and trace elements. Iron was determined as total Fe (Table 1Supplementary Table S2).
TABLE 1
| Phase 1 | Phase 2 | ||||||||||||
| Rock Type | Granite | Aplite | Granite | Leucogranite | Altered leucogranite | Strongly altered granite | |||||||
| Sample | WOL-12 | WOL-12-1 | WOL-13-1 | WOL-14 | WOL-14-1 | WOL-15 | WOL-15-1 | WOL-6 | WOL-10 | WOL-4 | WOL-5 | WOL-7 | WOL-8 |
| SiO2 (wt.%) | 71.99 | 72.86 | 75.07 | 71.86 | 72.96 | 74.36 | 73.71 | 75.27 | 74.79 | 76.86 | 77.08 | 82.47 | 65.85 |
| TiO2 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Al2O3 | 13.49 | 13.39 | 12.33 | 13.38 | 13.43 | 12.41 | 13.13 | 12.67 | 12.38 | 12.37 | 12.51 | 7.75 | 18.56 |
| Fe2O3(t) | 2.40 | 2.34 | 2.01 | 2.35 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 2.08 | 1.64 | 1.67 | 1.14 | 0.76 | 2.95 | 4.02 |
| MnO | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.20 |
| MgO | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.26 |
| CaO | 1.22 | 1.25 | 0.32 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.79 | 0.41 |
| Na2O | 4.13 | 4.16 | 2.64 | 3.62 | 3.62 | 3.26 | 3.53 | 3.76 | 2.92 | 3.73 | 3.86 | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| K2O | 4.24 | 4.26 | 6.39 | 4.91 | 4.84 | 4.76 | 5.19 | 4.57 | 5.43 | 4.88 | 4.65 | 2.79 | 6.52 |
| P2O5 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| LOI | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.51 | 1.60 | 3.10 |
| Σ | 98.54 | 99.32 | 99.57 | 98.54 | 99.40 | 99.09 | 99.77 | 99.45 | 99.04 | 100.59 | 99.87 | 98.98 | 99.34 |
| Sc (ppm) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| V | 10 | 12 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 14 | 20 |
| Cu | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 150 | 260 | 460 | 390 | 590 | 770 |
| Pb | 27 | 28 | 37 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 34 | 31 | 32 | 24 | 39 | 6 | 13 |
| Zn | 60 | 60 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 140 | 380 | 710 | 100 | 590 | 720 |
| Sn | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 27 | 13 | 4 | 331 | 374 |
| W | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 9.6 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 12.8 | 53.5 |
| Rb | 155 | 149 | 181 | 289 | 293 | 286 | 293 | 267 | 471 | 402 | 303 | 904 | 1100 |
| Cs | 7.4 | 7.3 | 3.3 | 16.4 | 17.3 | 8.9 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 19.4 | 12.3 | 10.8 | 29.5 | 51.8 |
| Ba | 509 | 509 | 203 | 378 | 371 | 313 | 345 | 245 | 260 | 124 | 83 | 158 | 312 |
| Sr | 141 | 134 | 55 | 95 | 93 | 78 | 82 | 66 | 60 | 46 | 32 | 8 | 9 |
| Ga | 22 | 23 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 21 | 21 | 20 | 23 | 18 | 18 | 53 | 109 |
| Ta | 1.25 | 1.29 | 1.53 | 3.72 | 3.97 | 3.51 | 2.95 | 1.57 | 1.66 | 3.02 | 2.02 | 1.15 | 1.75 |
| Nb | 13.2 | 13.6 | 16.3 | 21.3 | 23.2 | 22.7 | 19.2 | 17.6 | 12.2 | 11.3 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 15.3 |
| Hf | 9.0 | 8.1 | 4.2 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 6.3 | 4.7 |
| Zr | 345 | 305 | 113 | 199 | 203 | 223 | 190 | 170 | 184 | 75 | 64 | 208 | 124 |
| Y | 23 | 24 | 28 | 51 | 53 | 38 | 35 | 53 | 57 | 59 | 30 | 68 | 72 |
| Th | 12.7 | 14.6 | 30.2 | 31.6 | 33.1 | 33.9 | 29.2 | 33.6 | 29.7 | 23.4 | 18.4 | 21.5 | 26.3 |
| U | 2.08 | 2.05 | 2.24 | 5.25 | 6.17 | 3.72 | 3.53 | 5.33 | 5.80 | 7.65 | 7.79 | 6.04 | 15.6 |
| La | 45.8 | 54.7 | 53.0 | 45.7 | 47.5 | 48.7 | 44.2 | 41.6 | 38.2 | 13.4 | 10.5 | 38.9 | 34.3 |
| Ce | 86.6 | 108 | 120 | 96.6 | 105 | 82.7 | 71.8 | 91.3 | 88.1 | 30.1 | 24.0 | 88.2 | 75.9 |
| Pr | 9.2 | 11.5 | 12.9 | 11.3 | 11.9 | 11.5 | 10.5 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 3.71 | 2.72 | 10.5 | 9.09 |
| Nd | 32.1 | 39.0 | 45.5 | 40.2 | 42.4 | 40.6 | 37.0 | 36.7 | 40.8 | 14.2 | 9.88 | 37.9 | 34.3 |
| Sm | 5.64 | 6.32 | 8.38 | 9.12 | 9.44 | 8.32 | 7.58 | 8.23 | 8.99 | 4.23 | 2.73 | 8.37 | 10.2 |
| Eu | 1.30 | 1.28 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.57 | 0.73 |
| Gd | 4.58 | 4.99 | 6.47 | 8.26 | 9.06 | 6.75 | 6.31 | 7.93 | 8.50 | 5.63 | 2.98 | 7.85 | 10.7 |
| Tb | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.89 | 1.39 | 1.50 | 1.06 | 0.99 | 1.33 | 1.41 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.43 | 1.97 |
| Dy | 3.68 | 4.09 | 4.77 | 8.44 | 8.77 | 6.24 | 5.65 | 8.31 | 8.94 | 8.26 | 4.19 | 9.44 | 11.8 |
| Ho | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 1.64 | 1.75 | 1.22 | 1.09 | 1.71 | 1.81 | 1.83 | 0.86 | 1.95 | 2.29 |
| Er | 2.14 | 2.24 | 2.75 | 4.93 | 5.28 | 3.58 | 3.24 | 5.20 | 5.60 | 5.85 | 2.84 | 6.18 | 6.78 |
| Tm | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.48 | 0.95 | 1.02 |
| Yb | 2.17 | 2.20 | 2.73 | 4.98 | 5.21 | 3.52 | 3.37 | 4.88 | 5.73 | 6.89 | 3.33 | 6.54 | 6.80 |
| Lu | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 0.97 | 1.02 |
| Be | 5 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| M | 1.47 | 1.49 | 1.34 | 1.44 | 1.43 | 1.38 | 1.43 | 1.38 | 1.32 | 1.38 | 1.33 | ||
| TZr (°C) | 813 | 797 | 711 | 757 | 761 | 776 | 753 | 748 | 763 | 670 | 661 | ||
Major and trace element compositions of granites from the Tukhum pluton.
TZr (°C)—zircon saturation temperature estimate in °C calculated according to
Sm and Nd concentrations and Nd-isotope ratios of the granitic rocks (Table 2) were determined at the Atlantic Universities Regional Facility at the Department of Earth Sciences of Memorial University of Newfoundland (St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada) using a multi-collector Finnigan MAT 262 thermalionization mass spectrometer (Pollock et al., 2015). Replicate analyses of JNdi-1 yield a mean 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512100 ± 6. The 2σ values are given in Table 2. εNd(t) values were calculated with respect to CHUR using a present-day 143Nd/144Nd ratio of 0.512638 and a 147Sm/144Nd ratio of 0.196593, and were subsequently age-corrected. A TDM model age (Table 2) was calculated according to the model of
TABLE 2
| Sample | Age (Ma) | Phase | Nd (ppm) | Sm (ppm) | 147Sm/144Nd | 143Nd/144Nd(m) | 2σ | 143Nd/144Nd(i) | εNd(t) | TDM (Ma) |
| WOL-12 | 191 | 1 | 32.94 | 5.43 | 0.0998 | 0.512560 | 6 | 0.512435 | 0.84 | 659 |
| WOL-12–1 | 191 | 1 | 39.11 | 6.68 | 0.1033 | 0.512548 | 6 | 0.512419 | 0.52 | 695 |
| WOL-14 | 183 | 2 | 40.25 | 8.75 | 0.1314 | 0.512558 | 7 | 0.512401 | –0.04 | 905 |
| WOL-15 | 183 | 2 | 41.37 | 8.42 | 0.1231 | 0.512568 | 8 | 0.512421 | 0.35 | 809 |
| BU-1 | 221 | 26.3 | 6.75 | 0.1552 | 0.512648 | 6 | 0.512424 | 1.37 | 1032 | |
| BU-5 | 221 | 42.6 | 9.82 | 0.1394 | 0.512631 | 6 | 0.512429 | 1.48 | 849 | |
| BU-9 | 221 | 23.2 | 5.27 | 0.1373 | 0.512631 | 8 | 0.512432 | 1.54 | 832 | |
| BU-13 | 221 | 17.3 | 4.23 | 0.1478 | 0.512642 | 6 | 0.512428 | 1.46 | 934 | |
| BU-16 | 221 | 7.2 | 1.39 | 0.1167 | 0.512609 | 6 | 0.512440 | 1.69 | 695 | |
| BU-19 | 221 | 28.8 | 7.24 | 0.152 | 0.51265 | 6 | 0.512433 | 1.55 | 976 | |
| BU-25 | 221 | 27.2 | 5.39 | 0.1198 | 0.512642 | 6 | 0.512468 | 2.23 | 667 | |
| BU-34 | 221 | 44.5 | 9.01 | 0.1224 | 0.512617 | 6 | 0.512440 | 1.69 | 724 |
Nd isotopic composition of granitic rocks of the TSP and BU intrusions.
TDM—depleted mantle model age calculated using the model of
Zircon U-Pb Dating
Whole-rock samples, ca 1–2 kg in weight, were collected for mineral separation. Zircons were separated using conventional techniques: crushing, Wilfley concentration table, magnetic, and, finally, heavy liquid separations. Handpicked zircon grains were mounted in 1-inch epoxy-filled blocks, ground, and polished. Internal zircon structures were checked by cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging using scanning electron microscope at Charles University in Prague (Czech Republic). An Element 2 high-resolution sector field mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) coupled with a 193-nm ArF Analyte Excite (Teledyne/Cetac) excimer laser ablation system at the Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague was used to acquire the Pb/U isotopic ratios in zircons. The laser is equipped with a HelEx II active 2-volume ablation cell. The laser was fired at a repetition rate of 5 Hz, using a spot size of 25 μm. Acquisitions for standards and unknown samples consisted of a 15-s measurement of a blank followed by U and Pb signals from zircons for another 35 s. The signal was tuned for maximum sensitivity of Pb and U, Th/U ratios close to unity, and a low oxide level, commonly below 0.2%. The total of 420 mass scans data were acquired in time-resolved–peak jumping–pulse counting/analog mode with 1 point measured per peak for masses 204Pb + Hg, 206Pb, 207Pb, 208Pb, 232Th, 235U, and 238U. Due to a non-linear transition between the counting and analog acquisition modes of the ICP instrument and the fact that 238U is usually measured in “both” mode, the raw data were preprocessed using a Python module called ExctractDat for decoding the Thermo Element ICP-MS data files (
Elemental fractionation and instrumental mass bias were corrected by the normalization of an internal natural zircon reference material Plešovice for samples WOL-12 and WOL-14 (337 Ma, Sláma et al., 2008) and 91500 (1065 Ma, Wiedenbeck et al., 1995) for sample WOL-15. Zircon reference materials GJ-1 (609 Ma,
Geochronology
The age of the TP was not well established. The K-Ar whole-rock dating for the granite of the TP yielded a cooling age of 190.5 ± 4.7 Ma, whereas the whole-rock Rb-Sr gave an age range of 225 to 188 Ma (Smirnov et al., 1977). In order to refine the age, we have dated the pluton by a U-Pb zircon laser ablation ICP-MS technique.
The U-Pb isotopic ratios in zircons were measured in three samples (see Supplementary Table S1 and Figure 5 for dating results). Sample WOL-12 is biotite granite from the first intrusive phase while samples WOL-14 and WOL-15 are biotite granites from the second intrusive pulse. Most of the zircon grains from WOL-12, WOL-14, and WOL-15 are slightly pale brown or clear and are predominantly prismatic grains, and their fragments or rarely needles have a length of ∼200 to 500 μm. Internal crystal interiors visible in CL imaging revealed that the most of crystals show well-developed magmatic oscillatory (or sector) zoning with only slight alteration with rare featureless unzoned cores (Figure 6). All studied samples show uniform Th/U 0.1–0.6 (average value of 0.4; see Supplementary Table S1) in both the rims and cores. This Th/U ratio is typical of a magmatic origin (
FIGURE 5

Concordia diagrams with U-Pb isotopic data of studied samples (A) WOL-12, (B) WOL-14, and (C) WOL-15. All ages are quoted with 2σ uncertainties.
FIGURE 6

Representative cathodoluminescence images of the dated zircons grains. The spots (25 μm) where laser ablation analysis was performed are indicated together with obtained 206Pb/238U ages in Ma (±2σ uncertainties). (A) zircons from sample WOL-12; (B) zircons from sample WOL-14; (C) zircons from sample WOL-15.
U-Pb zircon dating of sample WOL-12 yielded a scatter in concordant ages between c. 185 Ma and 195 Ma that constitute a single concordia age of c. 191 ± 2 Ma (2σ; 25 analyses; Figure 5). The majority of zircon crystals extracted from samples WOL-14 and WOL-15 yielded a well-defined concordia magmatic age of ∼183 ± 2 Ma (2σ; 25 analyses; Figure 5) and 183 ± 2 Ma (2σ; 21 analyses; Figure 5), respectively. Inherited ages do not significantly differ from those obtained in zircon domains with magmatic growth zoning (Figure 6). Thus, the first phase intruded at ∼191 Ma while the second phase was emplaced at ∼183 Ma.
Geochemistry
Sampling and Alteration
The analyzed set of representative samples from TP pluton (Table 1) consists of two biotite granites (WOL-12 and WOL-12-1) and an aplite (WOL-13-1) from the first intrusive phase, four biotite granites (WOL-14,WOL-14-1, WOL-15, and WOL-15-1), two leucogranites (WOL-6 and WOL-10), and two moderately altered leucogranites (WOL-4 and WOL-5) of the second intrusive phase and two strongly altered granitic samples (WOL-7 and WOL-8).
The chemical compositions of the biotite granites were not significantly modified by secondary processes. On the other hand, there are notable differences among the leucogranites. Leucogranites (WOL-6 and WOL-10) probably retained most of their original composition while the moderately altered leucogranites (WOL-4 and WOL-5) were silicified, leading mainly to an addition of silica. The other two samples (WOL-7 and WOL-8) were strongly hydrothermally altered and accompanied by a notable change of the chemical composition. These two samples were not consequently plotted on some diagrams.
In addition to the TP rocks, 12 samples from the Bayan-Ulan granitic intrusion (see section “Relationship between petrogenesis and mineralization”) were also analyzed (Supplementary Table S2). These samples do not appear to be noticeably affected by secondary processes (
Major and Trace Elements
The granitic rocks of the TP are highly siliceous and fractionated with silica contents ranging from 71 to 77 wt.% (Figure 7). The silica contents of the first intrusion vary between 72 and 75 wt.% in contrast to the second phase with 71 to 77 wt.%. On the normative quartz-alkali feldspar-plagioclase (QAP) graph (Figure 8A), they plot into the field of granite. Although there are differences between the two intrusive phases, all the rocks have molar Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) ∼ 1–1.2 and Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) ∼ 1, indicative of their mildly peraluminous character with the exception of the granites of the first phase, which are mildly metaluminous (Figure 8B). The granites also have a high FeO∗/(FeO∗ + MgO) ratio (Figure 7A) and correspond to ferroan granites of
FIGURE 7

Variations of SiO2 (wt.%) versus (A) FeO*/(FeO*/MgO) showing the separation of ferroan and magnesian suites based on the relative degree of iron enrichment during differentiation (after
FIGURE 8

(A) Mesonormative quartz-alkali feldspar-plagioclase (QAP) ternary classification diagram used to characterize the modal composition of the plutonic rocks. It shows the Tukhum granitic rocks whereas the dashed green curve outlines the field (BU) for the Bayan-Ulan pluton. (B) Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) versus Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O; in mole%) diagram for TP granitic rocks defining the ranges of peraluminous, metaluminous, and peralkaline plutonic rocks. The dashed green line delineates the field (BU) for the rocks from Bayan-Ulan pluton.
The chondrite-normalized REE patterns of all the studied granites are enriched in light REE (LREE) and have relatively flat unfractionated heavy REE (HREE) and negative Eu anomalies. However, there are subtle differences among the rocks of the two intrusive phases. The patterns of phase 1 (Figure 9) have a relatively high (La/Yb)n ratio (∼14–18) accompanied by (La/Sm)n ∼ 4 to 6 and slightly sloping HREE with low (Gd/Yb)n ratios (∼1.8). They are closely comparable to the average of the granitic rocks of the whole Khentei batholith (Figure 9) reported by Yarmolyuk et al. (2013). The second intrusive phase has patterns with (La/Yb)n ranging from ∼7 to ∼10 and a more pronounced negative Eu anomaly than the first intrusive pulse. The leucogranites of the second pulse have variable REE patterns including a nearly flat one with (La/Yb)n ∼ 1.2 and (Gd/Yb)n ∼ 0.7. The altered leucogranites have patterns comparable to those of leucogranites. The flat HREE patterns imply that garnet was not in the source of the granites.
FIGURE 9

Chondrite-normalized rare-earth element diagrams for (A) phase 1 TP granite (WOL-12) and the average of granitic rocks of the Khentei batholith (Yarmolyuk et al., 2013); (B) phase 2 TP granites (WOL-14 typical biotite granite; WOL-4 and 5-altered leucogranites); (C) TP strongly altered granites; and (D) granites of the Bayan-Ulan pluton. Normalizing values are after Sun and McDonough (1989).
The primitive mantle-normalized plots of the TP granites (Figure 10) are distinctly enriched in several large ion lithophile elements, namely, Cs, Rb, Th, and U and depleted in Ba, Sr, Eu, Nb, and Ti. The altered leucogranites also have distinct positive anomalies for W and Sn. Relative to the granites of the first phase, the second-phase granites have lower Ba and Sr (Figure 7) but higher Rb, Ta, W, and Sn (Figure 10). An enrichment of Rb in the second-phase granites is reflected by the relatively low K/Rb ratio (mostly 50–150) compared to typical crustal values of ∼230 (Shaw, 1968; Taylor and McLennan, 1985). These rocks also have anomalous Ba/Rb and Rb/Sr ratios.
FIGURE 10

Primitive-mantle normalized incompatible element abundances for the granitic rocks of the Tukham and Bayan-Ulan plutons. (A) Phase 1 TP granite (WOL-12) and an estimate of total crust of Eastern China (
The temperatures of zircon saturation (TZr), estimated from relating the concentration of Zr to the bulk composition of the magma (Watson and Harrison, 1983;
Nd Isotopes
The Nd isotopic data are given in Table 2. The initial isotopic ratios and εNd(t) values are age-corrected to the ages of the emplacement (phase 1 = 191 Ma; phase 2 = 183 Ma). εNd(t) values of the TP granitic rocks are close to chondritic values (0 to +0.8), indicating that they were derived from a reservoir with a long-term history of near-chondritic Sm-Nd values. The values are similar to those of
Discussion
Petrogenesis
According to the chemical composition, the TP granitic rocks correspond to the A-type granites (Figure 11A). Specifically, they resemble the A2 group (sensu
FIGURE 11

(A) Plot of 104 Ga/Al versus Zr (ppm) of Whalen et al. (1987) showing the A-type characteristics of the granitic rocks of the Tukham pluton. I and S field is for I- and S-type granites. (B) Y-Nb-Zr/4 diagram of
FIGURE 12

(A) Ba/Sr and (B) Ba versus Sr (in ppm) diagrams for the granitic rocks of the Tukham pluton. Vectors depict the fractionation trends of the compositional changes in the residual liquid when the specified phase is progressively removed from the magma during fractional crystallization; Pl—plagioclase; Kf—K-feldspar; and Bi—biotite.
The origin of A2-type granitic rocks has been typically attributed to either fractional crystallization or crustal melting (
Compositional similarities of the granites of the first intrusion to the average of the Khentei batholith and to an estimate of the total crust of East China (Figures 9, 10), peraluminous/metaluminous characteristics of the granitic rocks, and the lack of intermediate rock types (Daly gap) negate an origin by fractional crystallization of mantle-derived mafic or intermediate magma but are consistent with a process where rising mafic magma triggers partial melting of the crustal material from which the granitic magma inherit their geochemical characteristics. This is a common process during lithospheric extension and is a consequence of magmatic underplating and crustal melting (e.g.,
Relationship Between Petrogenesis and Mineralization
The petrogenesis of peraluminous fluorine-rich leucogranites such as those of TP is still under dispute, although these rocks can be associated with Sn-W-U-Ta mineralization (
The smooth variation trends for some major and trace elements of the granites and leucogranites of the second intrusion (Figure 7) and their similarities to those from non-mineralized plutons indicate that most of the chemical compositions reflect primary magmatic evolution, including extensive fractional crystallization. On the other hand, the enrichment of some elements such as Rb (accompanied by low K/Rb), a kinked shape REE pattern, and the occurrence of topaz and fluorite among others probably reflect fluid fractionation/interaction involving fluorine. This suggests that trace elements in some rocks were modified by late or post-magmatic fluid–rock interaction (Webster et al., 2004; Salvi and Williams-Jones, 2005; Thomas et al., 2005;
The experimental studies (e.g., Syritso et al., 2018) indicate that the W preferentially partitions into the fluid phase, which commonly escapes from a magma chamber to the host rocks forming wolframite-bearing quartz veins or greisen that are typically structurally controlled. Their frequent association with fractionated granites indicates that they are closely related, although the W mineralization is post-magmatic and related to the hydrothermal solutions. They were probably derived from the same highly fractionated magma chamber. The W mineralization is also associated with greisen. Greisen represents granites, which were altered by fluids released from the magma during the late stages of its evolution. The geochronological study of Syritso et al. (2018) on several similar tungsten deposits from eastern Transbaikalia concluded that tungsten mineralization took place almost synchronously with the crystallization of associated granites. It also appears that in this part of CAOB including TP, the W mineralization is related mainly to Mesozoic plutons, where it was emplaced along the faults in apical parts of intrusions (Syritso et al., 2018).
Comparison With Granites of the Rift Zones
To evaluate the differences between the granitic rocks of the TP, a representative intrusion of the Khentei batholith, and those of the rift zones, the TP rocks are compared with those of the Bayan-Ulan pluton (221 Ma;
Tectonic Implications
After the collision of the Siberian and North China cratons, which led to the closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk basin, north-central Mongolia and an adjoining part of southern Siberia (eastern Transbaikalia) witnessed, during the Late Permian to Early Jurassic, an emplacement of large, concentrically zoned magmatic structures. One of these magmatic structures is the Khentei (Daurian-Khentei) megadome (Figure 2).
The emplacement of the A2-type granitic plutons of the Khentei batholith and of the surrounding rift zones is related to rifting and partial melting. The origin of the granitic rocks requires a heat source to produce an elevated temperature. Such a heat source is usually attributed to one of the following processes: (1) delamination of the lower lithosphere, (2) thinning of lithosphere during rifting, and (3) rising of a mantle plume. The application of these tectonic models to the region has been under discussion (e.g., Yarmolyuk and Kuzmin, 2011;
FIGURE 13

Reconstruction of the movement of the Mongolian mantle plume and the location of the magmatic complexes in northern Mongolia and Transbaikalia (modified after Yarmolyuk and Kuzmin, 2011, 2012;
The plume model can also account for the zonal arrangement of the Khentei magmatic center ranging from granites and granodiorites in the core of the batholith through Li-F-rich granites along the margin of the batholith (either within or just outside of the batholith) and finally to alkaline and peralkaline lavas and alkaline granitoid intrusions in the outer margin of the rifts (Yarmolyuk and Kuzmin, 2011). A larger degree of melting that took place at a shallower depth above the core of the magmatic center generated granites, while a deeper and smaller degree of melting took place at the margins and produced alkaline and peralkaline rocks.
Conclusion
The TP, one of the constituent bodies of the Mesozoic Khentei batholith, is made up of two distinct intrusions dated at ∼191 and 183 Ma, suggesting that the magmatic activity of the batholith lasted longer than the range of 230 to 195 Ma proposed by Yarmolyuk and Kuzmin (2011). The TP rocks are silica-rich A2-type granites, which are mainly alkali-calcic. On the primitive mantle normalized plots, they are enriched in Rb, Cs, U, and Th and depleted in Ba, Sr, Eu, Nb, and Ti. The TP rocks have εNd(t) ∼ 0 to +1 and Nd model ages ∼650–900 Ma. The isotopic values are within the range of other Mesozoic granites of the Khentei batholith. The granites were derived by the partial melting of middle/lower crustal Neoproterozoic rocks, followed by fractional crystallization. However, the presence of F-rich minerals in the rocks of the second intrusion as well as W-Sn mineralization suggests that the source of the parent magma of this intrusion was enriched in several rare metals including W and Sn. The younger second intrusion also contains leucogranites with trace element compositions indicative of combined crystal and fluid fractionation during the late stages of the evolution. The bulk of the tungsten mineralization of the TP is hosted in quartz veins and resulted from an escape of fluids from a magma chamber. The mineralization is associated with the evolution of the granitic magma. An increase of the pressure of the fluids in the magma chamber and their escape caused a brecciation of the rocks and triggered an emplacement of quartz veins hosting the W mineralization.
The partial melting required a heat source. The Late Paleozoic to Early Mesozoic granitic province in north-central Mongolia, which includes two batholiths, Khangai and Khentei, and the eastward migration of the magmatic center through time, is consistent with a mantle plume as a heat source for magmatism. The eastward migration of the magmatic centers over time from the Tarim Large Igneous Province (South Mongolia-Tarim traps) at 300–275 Ma through the Khangai magmatic center with the Khangai batholith at 270–240 Ma to the Khentei area of Eastern Mongolia and Transbaikalia (230–180 Ma) can be explained by the movement over a stationary mantle plume (the Mongolian plume of Yarmolyuk and Kuzmin, 2011).
Statements
Data availability statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author contributions
JD developed the idea, wrote the bulk of the manuscript, processed data, and collected samples. MS wrote a part of the manuscript, processed data, and created figures. OG contributed to the ideas and concept and wrote a part of the manuscript. RC collected and prepared samples and created figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by NSERC Canada Discovery grant to JD and by the institutional support RVO67985831 to MS.
Acknowledgments
We thank reviewers Ali Polat and Changqian Ma and co-editor Greg Shellnutt for constructive reviews that significantly improved the manuscript. We are also grateful to Yo. Majigsuren for providing assistance during fieldwork and for field photos and to J. Batsukh for help with a map compilation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors, JD.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2020.00242/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AntipinV.GerelO.PerepelovA.OdgerelD.ZolbooT. (2016). Late Paleozoic and Early Mesozoic rare-metal granites in Central Mongolia and Baikal region: review of geochemistry, possible magma sources and related mineralization.J. Geosci.61105–125. 10.3190/jgeosci.211
2
BakerT.PollardP. J.MustardR.MarklG.GrahamJ. L. (2005). A comparison of granite-related tin, tungsten and gold-bismuth deposits: implication for exploration.SEG Newslett.615–17.
3
BoehnkeP.WatsonE. B.TrailD.HarrisonT. M.SchmittA. K. (2013). Zircon saturation revisited.Chem. Geol.351324–334. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.028
4
BoninB. (2007). A-type granites and related rocks: evolution of a concept, problems and prospects.Lithos971–29. 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.12.007
5
ČernýP.BlevinP. L.CuneyM.LondonD. (2005). Granite-related ore deposits.Econ. Geol.350337–370.
6
CollinsW. J.HuangH. Q.JiangX. (2016). Water-fluxed crustal melting produces Cordilleran batholiths.Geology44143–146. 10.1130/g37398.1
7
DejidmaaG. (2003). State Geological Complete Map.Ulaanbaatar: Government of Mongolia. Report 5567.
8
DePaoloD. J. (1988). Neodymium Isotope Geochemistry: An Introduction.New York, NY: Springer, 187.
9
DonskayaT. V.GladkochubD. P.MazukabzovA. M.IvanovA. V. (2013). Late Paleozoic - Mesozoic subduction-related magmatism at the southern margin of the Siberian continent and the 150 million-year history of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean.J. Asian Earth Sci.6279–97. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.07.023
10
DorjsurenB.BujinlkhamB. (2004). State Geological Complete Map.Ulaanbaatar: Government of Mongolia. Report 5668.
11
DostalJ.ChatterjeeA. K. (1995). Origin of topaz-bearing and related peraluminous granites of Late Devonian Davis Lake pluton, Nova Scotia, Canada: crystal versus fluid fractionation.Chem. Geol.12367–88. 10.1016/0009-2541(95)00047-p
12
DostalJ.OwenJ. V.GerelO.KeppieJ. D.CorneyR.ShellnuttJ. G.et al (2014). The 186 Ma Dashibalbar alkaline granitoid pluton in the North-Gobi rift of Central Mongolia: evidence for melting of Neoproterozoic basement above a plume.Am. J. Sci.314613–648. 10.2475/02.2014.06
13
DostalJ.KontakD. J.GerelO.ShellnuttJ. G.FayekM. (2015a). Cretaceous ongonites (topaz-bearing albite-rich microleucogranites) from Ongon Khairkhan, Central Mongolia: products of extereme magmatic fractionation and pervasive metasomatic fluid: rock interaction.Lithos236-237173–189. 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.08.003
14
DostalJ.OwenJ. V.ShellnuttJ. G.KeppieJ. D.GerelO.CorneyR. (2015b). Petrogenesis of the Triassic Bayan-Ulan alkaline granitic pluton in the North Gobi rift of central Mongolia: implications for the evolution of the Early Mesozoic granitoid magmatism in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt.J. Asian Earth Sci.10950–62. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.04.021
15
EbyG. N. (1992). Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids: petrogenetic and tectonic implications.Geology20641–644.
16
FörsterH. J.TischendorfG.TrumbullR. B.GottesmannB. (1999). Late-collisional granites in the Variscan Erzgebirge, Germany.J. Petrol.401613–1645. 10.1093/petroj/40.11.1613
17
FrostC. D.FrostB. R. (2011). On ferroan (A-type) granitoids: their compositional variability and mode of origin.J. Petrol.5239–53. 10.1093/petrology/egq070
18
GaoS.LuoT. C.ZhangB. R.ZhangH. F.HanY. W.ZhaoZ. D.et al (1998). Chemical composition of the continental crust as revealed by studies in East China.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta621959–1975. 10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00121-5
19
HancharJ. M.WatsonE. B. (2003). Zircon saturation thermometry.Rev. Mineral. Geochem.5389–112. 10.1515/9781501509322-007
20
HartmanJ.FranksR.GehrelsG.HouriganJ.WenigP. (2017). Decoding Data Files from a Thermo ElementTM ICP Mass Spectrometer. Available online at: https://github.com/jhh67/extractdat.git(accessed October 20, 2019).
21
HoskinP. W. O.SchalteggerU. (2003). The composition of zircon and igneous and metamorphic petrogenesis.Rev. Mineral. Geochem.5327–62. 10.1515/9781501509322-005
22
HuppertH. E.SparksR. S. J. (1988). The generation of granite magmas by intrusions of basalts into continental crust.J. Petrol.29, 599–624. 10.1093/petrology/29.3.599
23
IvanovaG. F. (1976). Mineralogy and Geochemistry of The Tungsten Deposits in Mongolia.Moscow: Nauka.
24
JacksonS. E.PearsonN. J.GriffinW. L.BelousovaE. A. (2004). The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology.Chem. Geol.21147–69. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.017
25
JahnB. M.LitvinovskyB. A.ZanvilevichA. N.RechowM. (2009). Peralkaline granitoid magmatism in the Mongolian-Transbaikalian Belt: evolution, petrogenesis and tectonic significance.Lithos113521–539. 10.1016/j.lithos.2009.06.015
26
JahnB.-M.WuF. Y.ChenB. (2000). Granitoids of the Central asian orogenic belt and continental growth in the phanerozoic.Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh Earth Sci.91181–193. 10.1017/s0263593300007367
27
JargalsaikhanD. (1996). “Metallic mineral deposits,” in Guide to the Geology and Mineral resources of Mongolia, edsJargalsaikhanD.KazmerM.SanjaadorjD. (Ulaanbaatar: MUST), 157–158.
28
KhasinR. A. (1977). “Tin, tungsten and molybdenum,” in Geology of Mongolian People’s Republic (Moscow: Nedra), 270–436.
29
KorgesM.WeisP.LüdersV.LaurentO. (2017). Depressurization and boiling of a single magmatic fluid as a mechanism for tin-tungsten deposit formation.Geology4675–78. 10.1130/g39601.1
30
KuzminM.IYarmolyukV. V.KravchinskyV. A. (2010). Phanerozoic hot spot traces and paleogeographic reconstructions of the Siberian continent based on interaction with the African large low shear velocity province.Earth Sci. Rev.10229–59. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.06.004
31
Kylander-ClarkA. R. C.HackerB. R.CottleJ. M. (2013). Laser-ablation split-stream ICP petrochronology.Chem. Geol.34599–112. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.02.019
32
LiS.WangT.WildeS. A.TongY. (2013). Evolution, source and tectonic significance of Early Mesozoic granitoid magmatism in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (central segment).Earth Sci. Rev.126206–234. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.06.001
33
LinnenR. B. (1998). The solubility of Nb-Ta-Zr–Hf-W in granitic melts with Li and Li + F: constraints for mineralization in rare metal granites and pegmatites.Econ. Geol.931013–1025. 10.2113/gsecongeo.93.7.1013
34
LinnenR. L.CuneyM. (2005). “Granite-related rare-element deposits and experimental constraints on Ta-Nb-W-Sn-Zr-Hf mineralization,” in Rare-Element Geochemistry and Mineral Deposits, edsLinnenR. L.SamsonI. M. (Newfoundland: Geological Association of Canada), 45–68.
35
MillerC. F.McDowellS. M.MapesR. W. (2003). Hot and cold granites? Implications of zircon saturation temperatures and preservation of inheritance.Geology31529–532.
36
PatonC.HellstromJ.PaulB.WoodheadJ.HergtJ. (2011). Iolite: freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data.J. Anal. Atom. Spectr.262508–2518.
37
PeccerilloA.TaylorS. R. (1976). Geochemistry of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, Northern Turkey.Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.58, 63–81. 10.1007/BF00384745
38
PetrusJ. A.KamberB. S. (2012). VizualAge: a novel approach to laser ablation ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology data reduction.Geostand. Geoanal. Res.36247–270. 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2012.00158.x
39
PollockJ.C.SylvesterP. J.BarrS. M. (2015). Lu-Hf zircon and Sm-Nd whole-rock isotope constraints on the extent of juvenile arc crust in Avalonia: examples from Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, Canada.Can. J. Earth Sci.52, 161–181. 10.1139/cjes-2014-0157
40
RomerR. I.KronerU. (2016). Phanerozoic tin and tungsten mineralization-tectonic control on the distribution of enriched protoliths and heat sources for crustal melting.Gondwana Res.3160–95. 10.1016/j.gr.2015.11.002
41
SalviS.Williams-JonesA. E. (2005). “Alkaline granite-syenite deposits,” in Rare-Element Geochemistry and Mineral Deposits, edsLinnenR. L.SamsonI. M. (Newfoundland: Geological Association of Canada), 315–341.
42
SengörA. M. C.Natal’inB. A.BurtmanV. S. (1993). Evolution of Altaid tectonic collage and Paleozoic crustal growth in Eurasia.Nature364299–307. 10.1038/364299a0
43
ShawD. M. (1968). A review of K-Rb fractionation trends by covariation analysis.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta32573–601. 10.1016/0016-7037(68)90050-1
44
SillitoeR. H.HallsC.GrantJ. N. (1975). Porphyry tin deposits in Bolivia.Econ. Geol.70913–927. 10.2113/gsecongeo.70.5.913
45
SlámaJ.KošlerJ.CondonD. J.CrowleyJ. L.GerdesA.HancharJ. M.et al (2008). Plešovice zircon- new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis.Chem. Geol.2491–35. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.11.005
46
SmirnovV. N.KovalP. V.Tsypulov YuP.KovalenkoV.IAntipinV. S. (1977). K-Ar age of granitoid associations in Khentei (Mongolia).Dokl. Russ. Acad. Sci.232192–195.
47
SunS. S.McDonoughW. F. (1989). “Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes,” in Magmatism in the Ocean Basins, edsSaundersA. D.NorryM. J. (London: Geological Society London), 313–345. 10.1144/gsl.sp.1989.042.01.19
48
SyritsoL. F.BadaninaE. V.AbusshkevichV. S.VolkovaE. V.TerekhovA. V. (2018). Fertility of rare-metal peraluminous granites and formation conditions of tungsten deposits.Geol. Ore Deposits6033–51. 10.1134/s1075701518010063
49
TaylorS. R.McLennanS. M. (1985). The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution.Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 312.
50
ThomasR.FörsterH. J.RickersK.WebsterJ. D. (2005). Formation of extremely F-rich hydrous melt fractions and hydrothermal fluids during differentiation of highly evolved tin-granite magmas: a melt/fluid-inclusion study.Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.148582–601. 10.1007/s00410-004-0624-9
51
WatsonE. B.HarrisonT. M. (1983). Zircon saturation revisited: temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.64295–304. 10.1016/0012-821x(83)90211-x
52
WebsterJ.ThomasR.FörsterH. J.SeltmanR.TappenC. (2004). Geochemical evolution of halogen-enriched granite magmas and mineralizing fluids of the Zinwald tin-tungsten mining district, Erzgebirge, Germany.Mineral. Deposita39452–472.
53
WhalenJ. B.CurrieK. L.ChappellB. W. (1987). A-type granites: geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis.Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.95407–419. 10.1007/bf00402202
54
WiedenbeckM.AlleP.CorfuF.GriffinW. L.MeierM.OberliF.et al (1995). Three natural zircon standards for U–Th–Pb, Lu–Hf, trace element and REE analyses.Geostand. Newslett.1910–23.
55
YarmolyukV. V.KovalenkoV. I.KozakovI. K.SalnikovaE. B.BibikovaE. V.KovachV. P.et al (2008). The age of the Khangai batholith and the problem of batholith formation in Central Asia.Doklady Earth Sci.4231223–1228. 10.1134/s1028334x08080096
56
YarmolyukV. V.KovalenkoV. I.SalnikovaE. B.BudnikovS. V.KovachV. P.KotovA. B.et al (2002). Tectono-magmatic zoning, magma sources, and geodynamic of the Early Mesozoic Mongolo-Transbaikalian magmatic area.Geotectonics36293–311.
57
YarmolyukV. V.KuzminM. I. (2011). Rifting and Silicic Large Igneous Provinces of the Late Paleozoic - Early Mesozoic in the Central Asia: Large Igneous Provinces Commission. Available online at: http://www.largeigneousprovinces.org/11dec(accessed January 15, 2020).
58
YarmolyukV. V.KuzminM. I. (2012). Late Paleozoic and Early Mesozoic rare-metal magmatism of Central Asia: stages, provinces, and formation settings.Geol. Ore Deposits54313–333. 10.1134/s1075701512050054
59
YarmolyukV. V.KuzminM. I.KozlovskyA. M. (2013). Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic within-plate magmatism in North Asia: traps, rifts, giant batholiths, and the geodynamics of their origin.Petrology21101–126. 10.1134/s0869591113010062
Summary
Keywords
Rare metal granite, tungsten deposit, Central Asian Orogenic Belt, U-Pb zircon dating, petrogenesis, mantle plume, Mongolia, Mesozoic
Citation
Dostal J, Svojtka M, Gerel O and Corney R (2020) Early Jurassic Rare Metal Granitic Pluton of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt in North-Central Mongolia: Tungsten Mineralization, Geochronology, Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications. Front. Earth Sci. 8:242. doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.00242
Received
13 February 2020
Accepted
03 June 2020
Published
07 August 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
J. Gregory Shellnutt, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan
Reviewed by
Ali Polat, University of Windsor, Canada; Changqian Ma, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Dostal, Svojtka, Gerel and Corney.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jaroslav Dostal, jarda.dostal@smu.ca
This article was submitted to Petrology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.