Abstract
We present new mineralogical and geochemical data from modern sediments in the Chew Bahir basin and catchment, Ethiopia. Our goal is to better understand the role of modern sedimentary processes in chemical proxy formation in the Chew Bahir paleolake, a newly investigated paleoclimatic archive, to provide environmental context for human evolution and dispersal. Modern sediment outside the currently dry playa lake floor have higher SiO2 and Al2O3 (50–70 wt.%) content compared to mudflat samples. On average, mudflat sediment samples are enriched in elements such as Mg, Ca, Ce, Nd, and Na, indicating possible enrichment during chemical weathering (e.g., clay formation). Thermodynamic modeling of evaporating water in upstream Lake Chamo is shown to produce an authigenic mineral assemblage of calcite, analcime, and Mg-enriched authigenic illitic clay minerals, consistent with the prevalence of environments of enhanced evaporative concentration in the Chew Bahir basin. A comparison with samples from the sediment cores of Chew Bahir based on whole-rock MgO/Al2O3, Ba/Sr and authigenic clay mineral δ18O values shows the following: modern sediments deposited in the saline mudflats of the Chew Bahir dried out lake bed resemble paleosediments deposited during dry periods, such as during times of the Last Glacial Maximum and Younger Dryas stadial. Sediments from modern detrital upstream sources are more similar to sediments deposited during wetter periods, such as the early Holocene African Humid Period.
Introduction
The field of sedimentary geochemistry is at the forefront of both outcrop- and core-based paleoclimate research. Aided by the introduction of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) core scanning techniques, down-core patterns of element intensities and ratios in both marine and lake sediments are routinely applied as proxies of past climate changes (e.g., , ; ; ). Although the link between the chemistry of deposited weathering products and climate is complex, the distribution of mobile versus immobile elements in sediment likely varies in accordance with climate variables (e.g., temperature, precipitation; e.g., ; ; ; ). Element intensities (e.g., Zr, Ti, K) and ratios (e.g., K/Zr, K/Ti, K/Al, and K/Rb) are routinely used to trace a wide range of climate-related processes such as changes in rainfall amount (e.g., ; ) and intensity of weathering processes (e.g., ; ; ) within lake catchments.
The application of XRF-generated elemental proxies in paleoclimatology, however, is not without its pitfalls. Depositional variability, hiatuses and erosion, diagenesis, and pedogenesis commonly work together to obscure or overprint primary geochemical signals preserved in sediments. Authigenic mineral formation can also control lake sediment geochemistry, particularly in saline lakes (). Indeed, in many African lakes, clay minerals rich in Al, or zeolites rich in Ca or K, have been shown to alter in saline and alkaline lakes to produce Mg-rich authigenic clay minerals and Na-rich analcime (e.g., ; ; ; , ). As a result, large discrepancies between lake records remain unresolved, leading to difficulties in interpreting proxy records of climate (e.g., ). These challenges are in large part due to an incomplete understanding of proxy formation and are particularly relevant in paleolimnology, where down-core variability of selected elements in the sediment may have little direct relation with the rate and intensity of weathering of the surrounding catchment, but might rather reflect post-depositional hydrochemical conditions.
The potassium (K) record of the Chew Bahir basin provides an excellent example demonstrating the complexity of interpreting highs and lows in K content in the sediment as past water balance changes in the catchment (; ). considered multiple hypotheses to explain the K record, concluding that K enrichment in the sediment could not entirely indicate episodes of enhanced detrital input, but rather incipient low temperature K-fixation during illitization associated with Mg uptake and clay mineral layer charge increase (; ). It is worth noting that the temporal variability of the K record is remarkably consistent with half a dozen well-dated proxy records from continental Africa (e.g., ; ; ; ; ).
The present study takes its impetus from and has three main objectives. The study’s core objective is to describe the major input and alteration processes utilizing new geochemical data in modern sediments collected from the Chew Bahir basin. Second, by comparing the new geochemical data from the modern sediments with PHREEQC geochemical modeling, where the acronym PHREEQC stands for PH (pH), RE (redox), EQ (equilibrium), and C (program written in C), of local waters, the study aims to improve our understanding of relevant hydrogeochemical processes in the Chew Bahir catchment. Third, the study aims to further refine interpretations of the Chew Bahir K record using clay mineralogical and geochemical analysis of modern sediments collected from the Chew Bahir catchment. Within this framework, this study is aimed at advancing our understanding of such climate proxies, and the development of a reliable high-resolution environmental context for the newly investigated site of Chew Bahir. A preliminary attempt is made to investigate whether oxygen-isotope measurements of authigenic clay minerals covering notable warm/wet (e.g., the early-middle Holocene) and cold/dry intervals (e.g., the Last Glacial Maximum, LGM) suggest similar changes in wet and dry conditions inferred from the Chew Bahir K record.
Geomorphology of the Chew Bahir Basin
The Chew Bahir basin is a hydrographic and sedimentary system located at the southern sector of the Main Ethiopian Rift, northeast of the Omo-Turkana basin of southern Ethiopia and northern Kenya (Figures 1a–d). It forms part of a ∼250 km wide broadly rifted zone, mainly composed of Pliocene-Holocene sediment-filled basins underlying strongly uplifted Precambrian blocks (e.g., ). Oligocene basalts and subordinate rhyolites, trachytes, tuffs and ignimbrites cover the Precambrian basement units near the northeastern, northern and northwestern parts of the catchment. The Teltele plateau, which consists of Miocene basalts and rhyolite, trachyte and felsic tuff, is located in the eastern part of the Chew Bahir catchment (Figure 1d; see also ). The northern part of the Teltele plateau extends to the Konso upland, which is drained by the Segen River, one of the major rivers draining to the Weyto River, and then to the Chew Bahir basin ().
FIGURE 1
The Chew Bahir basin is a deep tectonic basin, where a nearly flat, ∼30 km wide and ∼100 km long playa surface is bounded by a ∼500 m high tectonic escarpments to its west and east. Formation of shallow but wide alluvial fans, the biggest of which is a 20 km by 10 km fan located just west of the Chew Bahir coring sites, has been the major geomorphological features at the borders between the basin and the adjacent highland graben shoulders. The Weyto River flows in a north-south direction, forming a wide and shallow deltaic system before it disappears into the playa wetland (Figure 1c). The northern part of the flat basin is covered by relatively dense grassland vegetation mostly inhibiting aeolian geomorphological processes. Only on the vegetation-free, strongly desiccated southernmost (∼20 km long) part of the basin can local aeolian deflation, remobilization and sedimentation of fine sediments by “dust-devils” or dust storms be observed. In the extreme southern part of the Chew Bahir basin, small aeolian geomorphological features like “kupsten” dunes appear close to the recent “coastline.”
The Chew Bahir tectonic basin, which has an elevation of ∼500 masl, lies on the southeastern side of the western Ethiopian highlands, which are greater than ∼2,500 masl (Figures 1a,b). The deep basin is thus located on the lee of potential dust sources, especially the Sahara. Likewise, the ∼1,800 m high Teltele plateau, which gently descends to the east, blocks potential dust plumes from reaching the southeastern Ethiopian lowlands. The paleo-lake ’periodically fills with water (up to 2 m in depth) supplied primarily via the Weyto River. Modern dust input in the form of local short events of “dust-devils” occurs during remobilization and deposition of dust from the loose playa sediments on the strongly desiccated surface in the extreme southern part of the basin.
In sum, the Hammar Range to the west and the highlands to the north and northeast, consisting of Late Proterozoic granite and gneiss, are therefore the primary sediment sources to the Chew Bahir basin (). All surface samples were therefore collected between sub-watersheds from riverbeds or the desiccated lake floor to help improve our understanding of proxy formation in this region (see sampling locations in Figure 1d and methods). However, it should be noted that our study cannot be considered an exhaustive survey of all geomorphological processes active in the larger Chew Bahir catchment.
Hydrogeological and Climatic Features of the Chew Bahir Catchment
Today the Chew Bahir basin and catchment area has two rainy seasons, during boreal spring and autumn, owing to the North–South migration of the tropical African rain belt (Figures 2a–c). The tropical African rain belt is commonly referred to as the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) but the twice-yearly passing of the tropical African rain belt may not necessarily be synchronized with the annual cycle of insolation (e.g., ). Catchment wide mean annual rainfall is in the order of 900–1,000 mm, and the boreal spring rainy season (i.e., March–May) accounts for >50% of the annual total ().
FIGURE 2
Water balance model estimates for paleo-lake Chew Bahir, based on the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land, estimate an actual evaporation rate for the catchment of 847 mm/a (). Although mesoscale convective processes and topography also play an important role in the development of rain-bearing systems in eastern Africa (e.g., ), aridity in the catchment area is linked to large-scale divergence in the lower troposphere (). The prevailing aridity in northern Kenya and southern Ethiopia is also associated with the Turkana Jet, which flows at low levels with highest wind speeds at the 850 mb pressure level; maximum aridity over the region occurs when the Turkana Jet is at minimum speed (). There is also a negative correlation between the strength of the Turkana Jet and low level divergence, and rainfall over that region (e.g., ). On a broader scale, rainfall patterns in eastern Africa are also sensitive to sea surface temperature variability in both the Indian and Pacific Oceans (e.g., ).
During the last African Humid Period (AHP), 20–30% more precipitation led to lake level rises of Lake Abaya-Chamo (). At that time, overflow spilled into the Chew Bahir basin forming paleo-lake Chew Bahir, which in turn overspilled into Lake Turkana after reaching the overflow sill at 543 masl ().
Materials and Methods
Sampling
Thirty-four surface samples from the main catchment areas of paleo-lake Chew Bahir were collected in October 2018 for mineralogical, and major, minor and trace element analyses (Table 1). Twenty-eight of these surface samples were collected between watersheds from riverbeds (henceforth referred to as watershed samples or WS samples). Six samples were collected from the desiccated lake floor (henceforth referred to as mudflat samples or MF samples). Twelve samples from the Chew Bahir pilot drill core CB-01 were analyzed from selected wetter and drier intervals of the late Pleistocene and Holocene based on the Chew Bahir K record (Figure 3; , ). Samples collected from wetter intervals (henceforth referred to as WI) include 6 samples from the AHP interval, ∼15–5 ka (; ). Samples collected from drier intervals (henceforth referred as DI) include 2 samples each from the LGM (∼21 ka BP; ), Younger Dryas (YD; ∼12.9–11.7 ka BP; ) and Late Holocene (representing the last ∼2 ka BP of the record; Figure 3). Three samples (i.e., W4, W25, and W26) were collected in November 2018 for grain size analysis (Figure 1). W25 and W26 were collected from the Weyto River catchment entering into the Chew Bahir basin. W26 was collected from a freshly accumulated riverbank, while W25 represents an alluvial fan accumulation site between Weyto town and Weyto River. W4 was collected from a deep incised river at the foot of the Hammar range in the southern part of the Chew Bahir basin (see Figure 1 for sample locations).
TABLE 1
![]() |
Major/minor (wt. %) and trace (including rare earth) (ppm) element compositions of modern and down-core Chew Bahir samples.
†Given in wt. %; Eu/Eu* = (2Eu/Euchondrite)/(Sm/Smchondrite + Gd/Gdchondrite).
FIGURE 3
X-Ray Diffraction, Electron Microprobe and Grain Size Analysis
The mineralogical composition of powdered bulk sediments and oriented mounts of clay particles (<2 μm) were analyzed using X–ray powder diffraction (XRD) at the Department of Geosciences, Georgia State University. The clay fractions were extracted according to Stokes’ settling velocity principle in 1,000 ml glassware. Randomly-oriented, powdered bulk samples were analyzed using Cu-Kα radiation (45 kV, 40 mA) from 5 to 70° 2θ, with a 0.02° 2θ step and 60 s per step, to identify a suite of non-clay minerals. Preferred-oriented samples of the <2 μm size fraction were analyzed in both air-dried (AD) and ethylene glycol-solvated (EG) states from 3 to 35° 2θ with a 0.02° 2θ step at 60 s per step, following the principles of .
The octahedral cation ratios [(Mg/(Al + Fe)] of the <0.1 μm size-fractions were determined using the JEOL-8200 electron microprobe at Rutgers University. The analyses were performed at 15 Kv accelerating voltage and 15 mA beam current, using a suite of in-house standards, including several hydroxyl-bearing sheet silicates, and derived from multiple sources. Data corrections were done using ZAF procedures. Since the samples are intrinsically fine-grained powders, normal polishing procedures could not be used and instead the samples had the form of compressed pellets that were sufficiently smooth to permit analysis. The presence of unquantified inter-grain voids reduces the overall density of the samples and, together with unanalyzed hydroxyl fractions, prevents the analysis totals reaching the nominal 100%.
Grain size analysis was carried out at the laboratory of the Geographic Institute, University of Cologne. Analysis was conducted in 116 channels from 0.04 to 2,000 mm with a Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer (LS 13320 Beckmann CoulterTM), using the Fraunhofer optical model. Before analysis, organic and carbonate content was removed using 15% H2O2 and 10% HCL, respectively. Grain-size parameters are based on and were calculated by GRADISTAT software version 8 ().
Quantitative Multi-Element and Oxygen-Isotope Analysis
A total of 46 samples were analyzed for major, minor and trace elements at the Activation Laboratories Ltd. in Ontario, Canada following the analytical procedure termed “Code 4LITHO Major Elements Fusion ICP (WRA)/Trace Elements Fusion ICP/MS.” Major, minor and trace element data were acquired by ICP-OES fusion and ICP-MS, respectively. Samples were analyzed in a batch system with each batch containing a method reagent blank, certified reference material and duplicates. Samples were analyzed for major oxides and selected trace elements (Code 4B) using Perkin Elmer Sciex ELAN 6000, 6100, or 9000 ICP/MS, providing a precision of ±5% and 10% for major and minor oxides, and trace elements at 100x the detection limit, respectively. Seven USGS and CANMET certified reference materials were used for calibration and one of the 7 standards was analyzed for every group of 10 samples. Three blanks and duplicates were analyzed per group of samples and every 15 samples, respectively.
The chemical index of alteration (CIA) was calculated on the basis of major element chemistry following as follows:
Six samples (3 each from DI and WI) were selected for clay mineral purification and subsequent oxygen-isotope analysis. Ultrafine clay size-fractions (<0.1 μm) were separated from the bulk sediments following routine centrifugation protocols () for XRD analysis. Samples were analyzed in both AD and EG states from 3 to 35° 2θ. Oxygen-isotope analyses were performed on the same samples at the Laboratory for Stable Isotope Science at the University of Western Ontario following and references therein. The results are presented in the normal δ-notation relative to the VSMOW-SLAP calibrated scale in parts per thousand (‰). Reproducibility was better than ±0.2‰. VSMOW-SLAP calibrated standards analyzed as unknowns returned δ18O = + 11.54 ± 0.2‰ (quartz; n = 2) and +10.18 ± 0.01‰ (carbon dioxide; n = 2), which compares well with their accepted values of +11.5‰ and +10.25‰, respectively ().
Geochemical Modeling
Geochemist’s Workbench® () was used to model the evaporative concentration of water with a dissolved solid composition equivalent to Lake Chamo, a freshwater lake that drains through the Segen River to the Chew Bahir basin (Table 2; ). Equilibrium reactions were modeled iteratively to dryness, assuming equilibrium gas exchange with the atmosphere. Equilibrium precipitation-dissolution was assumed with respect to gibbsite, and the precipitation of dolomite, talc, chrysotile, and mica were all suppressed as reaction kinetics likely do not favor these authigenic phases (; ).
TABLE 2
| Solute | Concentration (mg/L) |
| Na | 265 |
| K | 14.1 |
| Ca | 2.2 |
| Mg | 3.8 |
| Cl | 64.9 |
| SO4 | 4.1 |
| HCO3 | 573 |
| pH = 8.9 |
Chemical composition of Lake Chamo water used for geochemical modeling.
Results
Mineralogy and Grain Size Distribution
The mineralogical assemblage of the WS samples is composed primarily of sand- and silt-size particles containing a higher fraction of non-clay mineral silicate phases than the MF samples, which comprised mostly clay minerals. In addition to illite, smectite, and kaolinite, the <2 μm size-fraction of the WS samples also contain quartz and feldspar, and trace amounts of calcite and analcime (Figure 4). Analcime content increases in the MF samples that are transitional to the desiccated lake floor of the Chew Bahir basin. The <2 μm size-fraction of the MF samples contains illite, smectite and kaolinite (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4
Grain-size data of three samples are shown in Supplementary Figure 2. Two of the three samples (i.e., W26 and W4) show unimodal features, while one (W25) shows multimodal features (Supplementary Figure 2). All samples contained relatively little material in the 2–50 μm aeolian size range (Supplementary Figure 2). The amount of material within the 2–50 μm fraction in W26 and W4, and W25 samples is ∼14% and 36.8%, respectively.
Whole-Rock and Authigenic Clay Mineral Geochemistry
Major and trace element concentrations of the different sample groups show clear intergroup differences in the enrichment and depletion of certain major elements (Table 1). WS samples have higher SiO2 (50–70 wt.%) contents compared to the MF samples (Figure 5 and Table 1). In WS samples, as SiO2 content increases, most other element abundances decrease, suggesting their association with non-quartz minerals. K2O contents, however, remain relatively constant as SiO2 varies. In MF samples, major element contents increase with increasing SiO2, except for CaO, which strongly decreases. On the A–CN–K diagram (Figure 6a), WS samples are richest in Al2O3 (∼50–70%); CaO + Na2O contents in MF samples trend toward the cluster of WS samples while their K2O contents remain at ≤10%. On the A–CNK–FM diagram (Figure 6b), the CaO + Na2O + K2O content of some MF samples increases to ∼50% approaching the cluster of WS samples. CIA values (Table 1) range between 24 and 62 with WS samples consistently yielding higher values. Mean CIA values for WS and MF samples are 59 and 40, respectively. Mean CIA values for WI and DI samples are 44 and 42, respectively.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
Upper Continental Crust-normalized () chemical compositions of the sediments show that MF samples, on average, are enriched in elements such as Mg, Ca, Ce, Nd, and Na, and depleted of elements such as Ba and Zr relative to WS samples (Figures 7a,b). DI samples, on average, are enriched in Mg and depleted of K relative to WS samples (Figures 7c,d). Chondrite-normalized REE patterns reveal minor differences between the WS and MF samples (Figure 8). WS samples [e.g., mean (La/Sm)N = 2.61] are slightly depleted of Light REE (LREE) compared to MF samples [e.g., mean (La/Sm)N = 3.07] (Figure 8). Similarly, no significant differences are observed between Heavy REE (HREE) in WS [e.g., average (Gd/Yb)N = 1.61] and MF [e.g., average (Gd/Yb)N = 1.86] samples. No preferential removal of LREE or HREE is observed for either DI or WI samples (Figure 8). Eu anomalies in WS (mean Eu/Eu∗ = 0.85), MF (mean Eu/Eu∗ = 0.78), DI (mean Eu/Eu∗ = of 0.71), and WI (mean Eu/Eu∗ = 0.69) samples are also virtually identical (Table 1).
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8

REE patterns normalized to chondrite (
Whole-rock Ba/Sr ratios, a widely used proxy for weathering intensity (e.g.,
FIGURE 9

Comparison between (a) Ba/Sr and MgO/Al2O3 for WS, MF, DI, and WI samples and (b) K2O/Al2O3 and MgO/Al2O3 for WS and MF samples. WS, modern watershed; MF, modern mudflat; DI, late Quaternary dry interval; and WI, late Quaternary wet interval. The R2 values shown in the lower left corner of (b) are for Ba/Sr versus MgO/Al2O3 in WS and MF (blue), and WI and DI (purple) samples, respectively. Arrows in (b) show direction of increase in weathering intensity and salinity inferred from the Ba/Sr and MgO/Al2O3 ratios, respectively.
FIGURE 10

Comparison for DI and WI samples between (a) bulk K2O/Al2O3 and MgO/Al2O3, (b) octahedral Mg/(Al + Fe) versus δ18O of authigenic illite-smectite (<0.1 μm size-fraction), and (c) bulk MgO/Al2O3 versus δ18O of authigenic illite-smectite (<0.1 μm size-fraction). Arrows in (b,c) show direction of increase in salinity deduced from δ18Oillite–smectite.
Oxygen-isotope measurements of authigenic clay minerals (δ18Oillite–smectite = + 22.44 to + 25.32‰) show that, except for one sample, the DI samples have higher δ18Oillite–smectite compared to WI samples (Figures 10b,c and Table 3). The oxygen-isotope results for the <0.1 μm size-fraction also correlate well with the octahedral Mg/(Al + Fe) ratios determined by electron microprobe analysis (Figure 10b and Table 3).
TABLE 3
| Samples | Timing (Sample group) | δ18Oillite–smectite (‰)* | Oct Mg | Oct Fe | Oct Al | Oct Mg/(Fe + Al)* |
| CB- 05- 2010- 478 | LGM (DI) | +25.32 | 0.44 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.87 |
| CB- 01- 2009-658 | AHP (WI) | +23.07 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.65 |
| CB- 03- 2010- 468 | AHP (WI) | +24.52 | 0.99 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.47 |
| CB- 01- 2009-730 | YD (DI) | +24.83 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 0.46 | 0.95 |
| CB- 03- 2010- 570 | YD (DI) | +24.16 | 0.98 | 0.79 | 0.37 | 1.08 |
| CB- 01- 2009- 450 | AHP (WI) | +22.44 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.32 |
δ18O values and octahedral cation ratios for illite-smectite from late Quaternary samples.
*<0.1 μm size-fraction.
Geochemical Modeling
Model results (Figure 11) show the immediate precipitation of calcite, reflecting the near-saturation of most surface waters in the region with respect to calcium carbonate. Evaporative concentration increases the amount of calcite precipitation and is also associated with analcime formation (
FIGURE 11

Modeled hydrochemical evolution and mineral reaction pathways in the Chew Bahir basin showing the immediate precipitation of calcite, and followed by analcime and sepiolite, calculated based on Lake Chamo dissolved solid composition (Table 2;
Discussion
Weathering, Early Diagenesis and Authigenesis in Chew Bahir Sediments
The sedimentary deposits comprised in the Chew Bahir cores are primarily derived from Precambrian metamorphic rocks of the Hammar Range and the volcanic rocks at the northern and northeastern parts of the catchment via erosion and physical weathering of the source rock, which also facilitates chemical weathering. The CIA, first introduced by
As described in the Results section, notable differences in major and minor whole-rock geochemistry exist between MF and WS samples (Figure 5 and Table 1). Differences also include significant enrichment of MF samples compared to WS samples in some mobile elements (e.g., Na and Mg), which may have been introduced externally from saline, alkaline pore waters (Figures 7a,b). Na contents in WI and DI samples, however, are not significantly different (Figure 7c,d). The decreasing trend in Al2O3, Fe2O3, MnO, and MgO contents with increasing SiO2 in the WS samples reflects the process involved in the formation of the source granitic rocks by a simple fractional crystallization (e.g.,
The true extent of early diagenetic control on the elemental composition of Chew Bahir sediments is amplified in their clay mineralogy. The modern MF samples mostly contain illite, Mg-rich smectite and some kaolinite (Figure 4). The Mg enrichment observed in clay minerals from MF samples is similar to late Quaternary DI samples and most likely reflects authigenic clay mineral formation from the alteration of feldspathic glass (
Watershed samples also show a slightly higher degree of LREE and HREE fractionation compared to MF samples, while all sample groups also have negative Eu anomalies with no clear differences between WS and MF samples (average Eu/Eu∗ of 0.85 versus 0.78, respectively; Table 1) or WI and DI samples (average Eu/Eu∗ of 0.71 versus 0.69, respectively; Table 1). Assuming Eu concentration is not affected by weathering, a negative Eu anomaly is an indication of strong plagioclase fractionation in the source rocks; notably, the Proterozoic granitic and gneissic rocks of the Hammar Range show strong negative Eu anomalies (
Consistent with the CIA, intergroup comparisons between MgO/Al2O3 and K2O/Al2O3 or Ba/Sr for the bulk sediments suggest that the intensity of weathering, inferred from Ba/Sr data, is (and was) highest in late Quaternary WI and modern WS samples (Figure 9a). Although the link between weathering and geochemical proxy formation is known to be more complex, Ba/Sr ratios are routinely used as a weathering proxy. The power of this proxy is provided by the selective removal of more mobile Sr coupled with the relative immobility of Ba, which is readily adsorbed by clay minerals during weathering (e.g.,
The presence of analcime, a precursor zeolite formed under conditions of increasing lake water salinity and alkalinity, is noteworthy in all MF samples and WS samples collected near the desiccated lake floor (Figure 4). Analcime is also present in cores collected from the center of the Chew Bahir basin (e.g.,
Hydrogeochemical Processes in the Chew Bahir Basin
The Geochemist’s Workbench§ model results indicate that evaporative concentration increases the amount of calcite precipitation, eventually eliminating calcium from evolved waters (
Sepiolite [Mg4(Si6O15)(OH)2∙6H2O] is the final phase to reach supersaturation in the modeled system (Figure 11). Although sepiolite has not been observed locally and is not expected to precipitate in this setting, we can use its thermodynamics to model the behavior of Mg-silicates more generally (
In sum, thermodynamic modeling of evaporating Lake Chamo water produces an authigenic mineral assemblage typical of both modern lake mudflats in the Chew Bahir basin and Late Quaternary sediments recovered from cores (
Refining Interpretation of the Chew Bahir K Record Using Whole-Rock and Clay Mineral Geochemistry
The proposed relationship between basin aridity and K uptake in the sediment is compared with oxygen - isotope analysis of authigenic illite-smectite. The oxygen−isotope composition of authigenic clay minerals formed in lake water at isotopic equilibrium is controlled primarily by clay mineral composition, structure, and water temperature (
The δ18O of authigenic illite-smectite in the late Quaternary WI and DI samples range from +22.4 to +24.5‰ (average + 23.3‰), and +24.1 to +25.3‰ (average + 24.77‰), respectively (Figures 10b,c). Notably wet (i.e., during the AHP) and dry (e.g., at LGM and YD times) periods of the late Quaternary have been identified from the Chew Bahir K record, which are now largely confirmed independently by these oxygen-isotope measurements. The authigenic illite-smectite is generally most enriched in 18O during periods of regional aridity, which also coincides with significant Mg enrichment (Figure 10b and Table 3) and low-temperature illitization suggestive of enhanced evaporative concentration in the basin (Figure 11 and Table 4). Collectively, our results confirm that, in closed-basin lake deposits not overly diluted by detrital or biogenic sediments, subtle changes in water balance can be detected using both elemental and oxygen-isotope analysis of submicron authigenic clay minerals. Our first attempt to reproduce the climate signals recorded in the Chew Bahir K record using oxygen-isotope measurements of authigenic illite-smectite from notable warm/wet (e.g., during the Mid-Holocene) and cold/dry intervals (e.g., during the LGM) has proven to be successful.
TABLE 4
| Chew Bahir proxies | Arid | Humid |
| K concentration (counts) | ↑ | ↓ |
| Clay mineralogy (Illite versus smectite) | Illite ↑ | Smectite ↑ |
| Zeolite mineralogy | Analcime ↑ | Analcime ↓ |
| Oxygen isotopes | ↑ | ↓ |
| Ba/Sr ratios | ↓ | ↑ |
Arid and humid phases identified based on multi-proxy indicators.
Conclusion
New mineralogical and geochemical data from modern and ancient sediments in the Chew Bahir basin shed light on the role of sedimentary processes in chemical proxy formation. The data presented here show that the geochemistry of the modern saline mudflats in dry Lake Chew Bahir today resemble ancient sediments deposited during dry periods. Conversely, the geochemistry of modern detrital upstream sources can be compared to sediments deposited during relatively wetter periods, such as the AHP. This study demonstrates that interpretation of such geochemical datasets is complex and highly site-specific, and careful evaluation of any seemingly straightforward relationship between sediment composition and climate is required. This knowledge is critical for understanding proxy formation in playa sites and sedimentary records from semi-arid regions of the world.
Statements
Data availability statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Author contributions
DG, DD, VF, and AA designed the project. DD conducted the geochemical modeling. FL provided and acquired funding for the oxygen-isotope analyses. AA, FS, HL, and MT acquired the funding, designed, and directed the Chew Bahir Drilling Project as part of the Hominin Sites and Paleolakes Drilling Project, directed by A. Cohen of the University of Arizona. FS, AA, HL, and VF did the coring at Chew Bahir. JD carried out electron probe microanalyses of samples. VF, FS, AJ, MM, and HL added modern samples to this study. SO carried out grain size analysis of samples. DG led sample collection, data analysis, and wrote the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors. All authors revised the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by NSF grant (NSF 1349651) to DD. The oxygen-isotope measurements were supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant of Canada and the Canada Research Chairs Program (FL). FS acknowledges further funding from the DFG through grants SCHA 472/13 and SCHA 472/18. MT acknowledges funding from the DFG through grants TR 419/8, TR 419/9, and TR 419/16. In addition, FS acknowledges funding from the CRC 806 Research Project “Our way to Europe” – Project Number 57444011. HL was funded by grant NE/K014560/1 from the UK Natural Environment Research Council. This was Western’s Laboratory for Stable Isotope Science Contribution #385.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2021.607695/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AsratA.BarbeyP. (2003). Petrology, geochronology and Sr–Nd isotopic geochemistry of the konso pluton, south-western ethiopia: implications for transition from convergence to extension in the mozambique belt.Int. J. Earth Sci.92873–890. 10.1007/s00531-003-0360-9
2
AyenewT. (2005). Major ions composition of the groundwater and surface water systems and their geological and geochemical controls in the ethiopian volcanic terrain.SINET Ethiopian J. Sci.28171–188.
3
BethkeC. M.FarrellB.YeakelS. (2019). GWB essentials guide.Champaign, Illinois: Aqueous Solutions, LLC.
4
BlottS. J.PyeK. (2001). GRADISTAT: a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments.Earth Surface Processes Landforms261237–1248. 10.1002/esp.261
5
BrownE.JohnsonT.ScholzC. A.CohenA.KingJ. (2007). Abrupt change in tropical african climate linked to the bipolar seesaw over the past 55,000 years.Geophys. Res. Lett.34:20702. 10.1029/2007GL031240
6
BuggleB.GlaserB.HambachU.GerasimenkoN.MarkovićS. (2011). An evaluation of geochemical weathering indices in loess–paleosol studies.Quaternary Int.24012–21. 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.07.019
7
BurnettA. P.SoreghanM. J.ScholzC. A.BrownE. T. (2011). Tropical east african climate change and its relation to global climate: a record from lake tanganyika, tropical east africa, over the past 90+ kyr.Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.303155–167. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.02.011
8
ChesworthW.DejouJ.LarroqueP. (1981). The weathering of basalt and relative mobilities of the major elements at belbex, france.Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta451235–1243. 10.1016/0016-7037(81)90147-2
9
ClarkP. U.DykeA. S.ShakunJ. D.CarlsonA. E.ClarkJ.WohlfarthB.et al (2009). The last glacial maximum.Science325710–714.
10
CliftP. D.WanS.BlusztajnJ. (2014). Reconstructing chemical weathering, physical erosion and monsoon intensity since 25 ma in the northern south china sea: a review of competing proxies.Earth Sci. Rev.13086–102. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.01.002
11
CroudaceI. W.LöwemarkL.TjallingiiR.ZolitschkaB. (2019). Current perspectives on the capabilities of high resolution XRF core scanners.Quaternary Int.5145–15. 10.1016/j.quaint.2019.04.002
12
CroudaceI. W.RindbyA.RothwellR. G. (2006). “ITRAX: description and evaluation of a new multi-function X-ray core scanner,” in New techniques in sediment core analysis, ed.RothwellR. G. (London, UK: Geological Society of London), 51–63.
13
CullersR. L. (2000). The geochemistry of shales, siltstones and sandstones of pennsylvanian–permian age, colorado, USA: implications for provenance and metamorphic studies.Lithos51181–203. 10.1016/S0024-4937(99)00063-8
14
DavidsonA. (1983). The omo river project: reconnaissance geology and geochemistry of parts of Ilubabor, kefa, gemu gofa and sidamo.Ethiopian Instit. Geol. Surv. Bull.21–89.
15
DemenocalP.OrtizJ.GuildersonT.AdkinsJ.SarntheinM.BakerL.et al (2000). Abrupt onset and termination of the african humid period: rapid climate responses to gradual insolation forcing.Quaternary Sci. Rev.19347–361. 10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00081-5
16
DeocampoD.CuadrosJ.Wing-DudekT.OlivesJ.AmouricM. (2009). Saline lake diagenesis as revealed by coupled mineralogy and geochemistry of multiple ultrafine clay phases: pliocene olduvai gorge, tanzania.Am. J. Sci.309834–868. 10.2475/09.2009.03
17
DeocampoD. M. (2004). Authigenic clays in east africa: regional trends and paleolimnology at the plio–pleistocene boundary, olduvai gorge, tanzania.J. Paleolimnol.311–9. 10.1023/B:JOPL.0000013353.86120.9b
18
DeocampoD. M. (2005). Evaporative evolution of surface waters and the role of aqueous CO2 in magnesium silicate precipitation: lake eyasi and ngorongoro crater, northern tanzania.South Afric. J. Geol.108493–504. 10.2113/108.4.493
19
DeocampoD. M. (2010). The geochemistry of continental carbonates.Dev. Sedimentol.621–59. 10.1016/S0070-4571(09)06201-3
20
DeocampoD. M. (2015). Authigenic clay minerals in lacustrine mudstones.Geol. Soc. Am. Spl. Papers515SE503–SE515.
21
DeocampoD. M.BehrensmeyerA. K.PottsR. (2010). Ultrafine clay minerals of the pleistocene olorgesailie formation, southern kenya rift: diagenesis and paleoenvironments of early hominins.Clays Clay Minerals58294–310. 10.1346/CCMN.2010.0580301
22
DeocampoD. M.BerryP. A.BeverlyE. J.AshleyG. M.JarrettR. E. (2017). Whole-rock geochemistry tracks precessional control of pleistocene lake salinity at olduvai gorge, tanzania: a record of authigenic clays.Geology45683–686. 10.1130/G38950.1
23
DeocampoD. M.JonesB. F. (2014). “Geochemistry of saline lakes,” in Treatise on Geochemistry, Second Edn, edsHollandH. D.TurekianK. K. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 437–469.
24
DeocampoD. M.TactikosJ. C. (2010). Geochemical gradients and artifact mass densities on the lowermost Bed II eastern lake margin (~ 1.8 Ma), olduvai gorge, tanzania.Quaternary Res.74411–423. 10.1016/j.yqres.2010.09.004
25
EberlD. D.ŚrodoñJ.NorthropH. R. (1986). “Potassium fixation in smectite by wetting and drying,” in Geochemical Processes at Mineral Surfaces, edsDaviesJ. A.HayesK. F. (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Symposium), 296–326.
26
EbingerC.YemaneT.HardingD.TesfayeS.KelleyS.RexD. (2000). Rift deflection, migration, and propagation: linkage of the ethiopian and eastern rifts, africa.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.112163–176. 10.1130/0016-76062000112<163:RDMAPL<2.0.CO;2
27
EhrmannW.SchmiedlG.BeuscherS.KrügerS. (2017). Intensity of african humid periods estimated from saharan dust fluxes.PloS one12:e0170989. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170989
28
FischerM. L.MarkowskaM.BachoferF.FoersterV. E.AsratA.ZielhoferC.et al (2020). Determining the pace and magnitude of lake level changes in southern ethiopia over the last 20,000 years using lake balance modelling and SEBAL.Front. Earth Sci.8:197. 10.3389/feart.2020.00197
29
FoersterV.DeocampoD. M.AsratA.GünterC.JungingerA.KrämerK. H.et al (2018). Towards an understanding of climate proxy formation in the chew bahir basin, southern ethiopian rift.Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.501111–123. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.04.009
30
FoersterV.JungingerA.LangkampO.GebruT.AsratA.UmerM.et al (2012). Climatic change recorded in the sediments of the chew bahir basin, southern ethiopia, during the last 45,000 years.Quaternary Int.27425–37. 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.06.028
31
FolkR. L.WardW. C. (1957). Brazos river bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters.J. Sediment. Petrol.273–26. 10.1306/74D70646-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D
32
GarzantiE.PadoanM.SettiM.López-GalindoA.VillaI. M. (2014). Provenance versus weathering control on the composition of tropical river mud (southern africa).Chem. Geol.36661–74. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.12.016
33
GebregiorgisD.DeocampoD. M.LongstaffeF. J.SimpsonA.AshleyG. M.BeverlyE. J.et al (2020a). Oxygen isotopes in authigenic clay minerals: Toward building a reliable salinity proxy.Geophys. Res. Lett.47:e2019GL085576. 10.1029/2019GL085576
34
GebregiorgisD.GiosanL.HathorneE. C.AnandP.Nilsson-KerrK.PlassA.et al (2020b). What can we learn from X-ray fluorescence core scanning data? A paleomonsoon case study.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.21:e2019GC008414. 10.1029/2019GC008414
35
GebregiorgisD.RaynerD.LinderholmH. W. (2019). Does the IOD independently influence seasonal monsoon patterns in northern ethiopia?Atmosphere10:432. 10.3390/atmos10080432
36
HarrissR. C.AdamsJ. A. (1966). Geochemical and mineralogical studies on the weathering of granitic rocks.Am. J. Sci.264146–173. 10.2475/ajs.264.2.146
37
HayR. L. (1978). “Geologic occurrence of zeolites,” in Natural zeolites: Occurrence, properties, use, edsSandL. B.MumptonF. A. (Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press), 135–143.
38
HayR. L.SheppardR. A. (2001). Occurrence of zeolites in sedimentary rocks: an overview.Rev. Mineral. Geochem.45217–234. 10.2138/rmg.2001.45.6
39
HendyI. L.NapierT. J.SchimmelmannA. (2015). From extreme rainfall to drought: 250 years of annually resolved sediment deposition in santa barbara basin, california.Quaternary Int.3873–12. 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.01.026
40
HessionS. L.MooreN. (2011). A spatial regression analysis of the influence of topography on monthly rainfall in east africa.Int. J. Climatol.311440–1456. 10.1002/joc.2174
41
HuggettJ.AdetunjiJ.LongstaffeF.WrayD. (2017). Mineralogical and geochemical characterisation of warm-water, shallow-marine glaucony from the tertiary of the london basin.Clays Clay Minerals5225–50. 10.1180/claymin.2017.052.1.02
42
JungingerA.TrauthM. H. (2013). Hydrological constraints of paleo-lake suguta in the northern kenya rift during the african humid period (15–5 ka BP).Global Planetary Change111174–188. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.09.005
43
LibbeyR. B.LongstaffeF. J.FlemmingR. L. (2013). Clay mineralogy, oxygen isotope geochemistry, and water/rock ratio estimates, Te Mihi area, Wairakei geothermal field, new zealand.Clays Clay Minerals61204–217. 10.1346/CCMN.2013.0610304
44
LyonsR. P.ScholzC. A.CohenA. S.KingJ. W.BrownE. T.IvoryS. J.et al (2015). Continuous 1.3-million-year record of east african hydroclimate, and implications for patterns of evolution and biodiversity.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.11215568–15573. 10.1073/pnas.1512864112
45
McDonoughW. F.SunS. S. (1995). The composition of the earth.Chem. Geol.120223–253. 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4
46
McLennanS. M. (2001). Relationships between the trace element composition of sedimentary rocks and upper continental crust.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.2:1021. 10.1029/2000GC000109
47
MiddelburgJ. J.van der WeijdenC. H.WoittiezJ. R. (1988). Chemical processes affecting the mobility of major, minor and trace elements during weathering of granitic rocks.Chem. Geol.68253–273. 10.1016/0009-2541(88)90025-3
48
MooreD.ReynoldsR. (1997). X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, Second Edn. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
49
NesbittH.YoungG. (1982). Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites.Nature299715–717. 10.1038/299715a0
50
NesbittH. W. (1979). Mobility and fractionation of rare earth elements during weathering of a granodiorite.Nature279206–210. 10.1038/279206a0
51
NesbittH. W.MarkovicsG. (1980). Chemical processes affecting alkalis and alkaline earths during continental weathering.Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta441659–1666. 10.1016/0016-7037(80)90218-5
52
NicholsonS. (2016). The turkana low-level jet: mean climatology and association with regional aridity.Int. J. Climatol.362598–2614. 10.1002/joc.4515
53
NicholsonS. E. (2018). The ITCZ and the seasonal cycle over equatorial africa.Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.99337–348. 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0287.1
54
Otto-BliesnerB. L.RussellJ. M.ClarkP. U.LiuZ.OverpeckJ. T.KoneckyB.et al (2014). Coherent changes of southeastern equatorial and northern african rainfall during the last deglaciation.Science3461223–1227. 10.1126/science.1259531
55
RenautR. (1993). Zeolitic diagenesis of late quaternary fluviolacustrine sediments and associated calcrete formation in the lake bogoria basin, kenya rift valley.Sedimentology40271–301. 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1993.tb01764.x
56
RobertsN.TaiebM.BarkerP.DamnatiB.IcoleM.WilliamsonD. (1993). Timing of the younger dryas event in east africa from lake-level changes.Nature366146–148. 10.1038/366146a0
57
SavinS.LeeM. (1988). Isotopic studies of phyllosilicates.Rev. Mineral. Geochem.19189–223.
58
ShanahanT. M.McKayN. P.HughenK. A.OverpeckJ. T.Otto-BliesnerB.HeilC. W.et al (2015). The time-transgressive termination of the african humid period.Nat. Geosci.8140–144. 10.1038/ngeo2329
59
SingerA.StoffersP. (1980). Clay mineral diagenesis in two east african lake sediments.Clays Clay Minerals15291–307. 10.1180/claymin.1980.015.3.09
60
SunL.SemazziF. H.GiorgiF.OgalloL. (1999). Application of the NCAR regional climate model to eastern africa: 1. Simulation of the short rains of 1988.J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres1046529–6548. 10.1029/1998JD200051
61
SurdamR. C.EugsterH. P. (1976). Mineral reactions in the sedimentary deposits of the lake magadi region, kenya.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.871739–1752. 10.1130/0016-7606197687<1739:MRITSD<2.0.CO;2
62
TianJ.XieX.MaW.JinH.WangP. (2011). X-ray fluorescence core scanning records of chemical weathering and monsoon evolution over the past 5 Myr in the southern south china sea.Paleoceanography26
63
TierneyJ. E.deMenocalP. B. (2013). Abrupt shifts in horn of africa hydroclimate since the last glacial maximum.Science342843–846. 10.1126/science.1240411
64
TrauthM. H.DeinoA.BergnerA. G. N.StreckerM. R. (2003). East african climate change and orbital forcing during the last 175 kyr BP.Earth Planetary Sci. Lett.206297–313. 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01105-6
65
TrauthM. H.DeinoA.StreckerM. R. (2001). Response of the east african climate to orbital forcing during the last interglacial (130-117 kyr BP) and the early last glacial (117-60 kyr BP).Geology29499–502. 10.1130/0091-76132001029<0499:ROTEAC<2.0.CO;2
66
ViehbergF. A.JustJ.DeanJ. R.WagnerB.FranzS. O.KlasenN.et al (2018). Environmental change during MIS4 and MIS 3 opened corridors in the horn of africa for homo sapiens expansion.Quat. Sci. Rev.202139–153. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.09.008
Summary
Keywords
oxygen isotopes in authegenic clay minerals, X-ray core scanning, paleoclimate proxy formation and interpretation, whole-rock and clay mineralogy, geochemical modeling, the Chew Bahir K record
Citation
Gebregiorgis D, Deocampo DM, Foerster V, Longstaffe FJ, Delaney JS, Schaebitz F, Junginger A, Markowska M, Opitz S, Trauth MH, Lamb HF and Asrat A (2021) Modern Sedimentation and Authigenic Mineral Formation in the Chew Bahir Basin, Southern Ethiopia: Implications for Interpretation of Late Quaternary Paleoclimate Records. Front. Earth Sci. 9:607695. doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.607695
Received
17 September 2020
Accepted
24 March 2021
Published
30 April 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Gary E. Stinchcomb, Murray State University, United States
Reviewed by
Steven L. Forman, Baylor University, United States; Dhananjay Anant Sant, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Gebregiorgis, Deocampo, Foerster, Longstaffe, Delaney, Schaebitz, Junginger, Markowska, Opitz, Trauth, Lamb and Asrat.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniel Gebregiorgis, dgebregiorgis@gsu.edu
This article was submitted to Quaternary Science, Geomorphology and Paleoenvironment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
