ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci., 25 May 2021

Sec. Quaternary Science, Geomorphology and Paleoenvironment

Volume 9 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.678189

Response of Mangrove Development to Air Temperature Variation Over the Past 3000 Years in Qinzhou Bay, Tropical China

  • 1. College of Marine Geosciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China

  • 2. Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Metallogeny, First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao, China

  • 3. Laboratory for Marine Geology and Environment, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China

  • 4. School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

Abstract

Mangroves, a blue carbon ecosystem between land and ocean in the (sub)tropics, are sensitive to changes in climate and the sea level. It is imperative to reconstruct the historical dynamics of their development to predict the fate of mangrove ecosystems in the backdrop of rapid global changes. This study analyzes records of the sources of organic matter from sediment core Q43 of Qinzhou Bay in tropical China by using the endmember mixing model based on stable organic carbon isotopes and C/N ratio. Mangrove-derived organic matter (MOM) is regarded as a reliable indicator for reconstructing the historical development of mangroves. The variations in MOM in Qinzhou Bay over the past ∼3,000 cal yr BP indicate that mangrove forests underwent two periods of flourishment: ∼2,200–1,750 cal yr BP and ∼1,370–600 cal yr BP, as well as three periods of deterioration: ∼3,000–2,200 cal yr BP, ∼1,750–1,370 cal yr BP, and ∼600–0 cal yr BP. Of factors that might have been influential, changes in the relative sea level and the regional hydrological environment (e.g., seawater temperature, salinity, and hydrodynamic conditions) did not appear to have notable effects on mangrove flourishing/degradation. However, climate change, especially the variation in air temperature, formed the primary factor controlling mangrove development. The stages of mangrove flourishing/deterioration corresponded to the warm/cold periods of the climate, respectively. Noteworthy is that the rapid rise in air temperature during the Anthropocene warm period should have promoted mangrove development, but the increasing intensity of human activity has reversed this tendency leading to the degradation of mangroves.

Introduction

Mangroves inhabit intertidal zones in tropical and subtropical regions, and control exchanges of materials at the interfaces of the land, marine, and atmosphere ecosystems (; ). They provide multiple ecosystem services, such as mitigating coastal erosion from waves and wind, guaranteeing fishery resources and food security for coastal inhabitants, and aiding in the protection of adjacent seagrass and coral reef ecosystems (; ; ; ; ). More importantly, mangrove forests are efficient producers, capturers, and sinks of carbon (; ; ; ). Hence, they play a disproportionately important role in global carbon cycling, and are key blue carbon sinks that can contribute to climate change mitigation (; ; ; ; ).

However, mangrove forests are sensitive and vulnerable to environmental changes, e.g., climate change and fluctuations in the sea level (; ; ; ; ; ; ). Mangroves can migrate to landward/seaward regions with the rise/fall in the relative sea level (RSL) (; ). A rapid change in the RSL can result in the decline or even the disappearance of mangrove habitats. Low-intensity rainfall can also lead to mangrove degradation through reductions in freshwater runoff, fluvial sediment, and nutrient inputs (; ). High-frequency winter cooling events induced by variations in the intensity of the monsoon can also prevent mangrove development (). Likewise, high-temperature events can result in hypersaline conditions with high evaporation rates (), which lead to mangrove degradation. In addition, anthropogenic threats, such as pollution, overexploitation, and the conversion of patterns of land use (; ; ), have vastly impacted mangrove dynamics, especially since the Anthropocene.

The world at present is characterized by a rapid sea level rise, rapid warming, frequent extreme climate events, and an increasing population. Therefore, to predict the fate of mangrove ecosystems under this rapidly changing environment, it is imperative to understand how they have changed or disappeared in the past (), by reconstructing historical mangrove dynamics through useful indicators recorded in sediments (; ; ; ; ; ; ).

Tropical or subtropical Asia, a region that features a unique climate system (Asian monsoon) and a long history of human civilization, holds most of the world’s mangrove forests along its winding and long coastline (). Hence, it is an ideal selection to study the mangrove development and its responses to natural and anthropogenic factors. In this study, we use records of organic matter (OM) sources from sediment core Q43 of Qinzhou Bay (Figure 1) in tropical China to reconstruct the history of mangrove development over the past 3,000 years. The aim is to answer the question of how mangrove forests respond to changes in the sea level, climate (air temperature and rainfall), hydrological environment (seawater temperature, salinity, and hydrodynamic conditions), and anthropogenic activities.

FIGURE 1

), YLW02 in Yingluo Bay (), and Dongge Cave in SW China (). GTSC: Gulf of Tonkin Surface Current ().

Materials and Methods

Study Area and Sampling Site

Qinzhou Bay is located in the northern Gulf of Tonkin (Figure 1B) in tropical China (Figure 1C), and is divided into an inner zone (Maowei Sea) and an outer zone by a narrow channel (Figure 1A). Two small tropical rivers, the Maoling River and the Qin River, debouching into the Qinzhou Bay. Most of the intertidal zone of the Maowei Sea and adjacent coasts are occupied by mangrove forests. The Maowei Sea Mangrove Nature Reserve was established by the local government in 2005. The mangrove forests are generally 1–4 m high and exhibit a zonal distribution from the upper (Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Rhizophora stylosa), middle (Kandelia candel and Egiceras corniculatum), and lower (Avicennia marina) tidal flats ().

The study area is characterized by tropical monsoonal climate. The mean annual air temperature is 22.4°C, and ranges from 0.8 to 37.4°C. The average annual rainfall is 2,150 mm, 80–85% of which falls during the summer rainy season (April–September). The region experiences an irregular diurnal tide with a mean tidal range of 2.5 m (). The features of the seawater, which are affected only by monsoonal rainfall, are relatively stable, with a mean temperature of 23.5°C, salinity of 20–23‰, and pH of 7.6–7.8 (). The anticlockwise Gulf of Tonkin Surface Current (GTSC) controls the regional hydrologic system ().

The sediment core Q43 (108°40.49′E, 21°32.73′N), which is 150 cm long, was collected from Qinzhou Bay at a depth of 9 m in May 2009 using a gravity piston corer (Figure 1A). The core is located in the center of the outer zone of Qinzhou Bay, and thus its sedimentary records best reflect the history of mangrove development for the entire Qinzhou Bay. According to the sedimentary features, the core can be visually divided into two sections: the lower section (150–100 cm) is characterized by dark yellowish-brown sandy sediments and lower water concentration, and the upper section (150–0 cm) is mainly composed of finer dark gray sand-silt-clay and contains many fragmentized shells at 5–6, 56–57, and 86–88 cm. There is no clear hiatus between the upper and lower sections. The sediment core was sectioned by stainless steel cutters at intervals of 2 cm within 24 h of collection. All sediment subsamples were freeze-dried for 72 h at −55°C, and were then packed in sealed polyethylene bags and stored in a desiccator at room temperature for subsequent analyses.

Laboratory Analyses

Shells from six horizons were selected for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) 14C dating measurement at the Beta Analyses Company in FL, United States (Table 1). The conventional radiocarbon ages were corrected by a regional carbon reservoir age of 10 ± 50 years () and converted into calibrated calendar years by the program Calib 7.1 with Marine 13 calibration curves (). All calibrated ages were reported in years before 1950 CE (yr BP) and in cal yr BP with a precision of 2σ.

TABLE 1

Depth (cm)MaterialConventional age (yr BP)Calibrated age range (cal yr BP, 2σ)Mean calibrated age (cal yr BP)
6Shell660 ± 30138–431285
27Shell1,340 ± 30729–995862
57Shell1,850 ± 301,278–1,5171,398
81Shell2,160 ± 301,582–1,8791,731
101Shell2,500 ± 301,994–2,3002,147
149Shell3,330 ± 302,933–3,3313,162

List of AMS 14C ages from core Q43.

The grain size distribution was measured by using a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 laser particle analyzer (Malvern, Inc., United Kingdom), at a measurement range of 0.02–2,000 μm and a size resolution of 0.01 φ after removing the OM and carbonate fractions by adding 15 ml 3% H2O2 and 5 ml 10% hydrochloric acid (HCl), respectively. All sample preparation and measurements were completed at the Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Metallogeny of the First Institute of Oceanography, China Ministry of Natural Resources.

The freeze-dried sediment samples were treated with 1 N of HCl for 24 h at room temperature (25°C) to remove inorganic carbon. Then, they were rinsed by ultra-pure water several times until pH 7, and left to dry at 50°C for 72 h. Approximately 30–40 mg of homogenized dry sediments were carefully placed in tin capsules and crimp-sealed for analysis. The contents of stable organic carbon isotope (13Corg), total organic carbon (TOC), and total nitrogen (TN) were determined for all subsamples by a Delta Plus XP mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany), and by a Vario EL-III Elemental Analyzer (Elementar, Hanau, Germany) in continuous flow mode at the Stable Isotope Laboratory of College of Resources and Environmental Sciences of the China Agricultural University (Beijing). The results are reported in standard delta notation (δ) using permitted units (‰):where δ (‰) represents the stable isotope value of organic carbon and R is the 13C/12C ratio. The reference standard used for carbon is the Vienna PeeDee Belemnite (VPDB) standard. The analytical precisions of 13Corg, TOC, and TN were ±0.2‰, ±0.02 wt. %, and ±0.005 wt. %, respectively. The C/N ratio was calculated by the atomic (molar) ratio of TOC to TN.

Endmember Mixing Models for Discriminating Organic Matter Sources

The endmember mixing model is a classical method by which the proportional contributions of different sources to a mixture OM can be quantified (; ). Models based on δ13C and/or C/N have been widely used to identify the sources of OM in the sediments or suspended solids of different ecosystems, such as rivers (; ), lakes (), and ocean (; ; , ). The formulae for the ternary mixing model based on δ13C and C/N are as follows:where A, B, and C are the potential OM endmembers, and f represents the percentage of contribution of each endmember. The values of δ13C and C/N of the endmembers are discussed in Potential Sources of Organic Matter and Their Endmember Values. When the OM in a sample is a mixture of two sources, it should be explained by using a binary mixing model with δ13C:

Results

Chronological Results and Sedimentary Rates

Calibrated radiocarbon ages at depths of 6, 27, 57, 81, 101, and 122 cm produced ages of 285, 862, 1,398, 1,731, 2,147, and 3,162 cal yr BP, respectively, and no age inversion was observed (Table 1). Downcore ages were calculated by linear interpolation between the dated sediment layers. Based on the ratio of the depth intervals to the time spans, the sedimentation rates of the core sections 0–6, 6–27, 27–57, 57–81, 81–101, and 101–149 cm were about 21.1, 36.4, 56.0, 72.1, 48.0, and 47.3 cm kyr−1, respectively (Figure 2), with a mean value of 47.12 cm kyr−1. The sedimentation rates in core Q43 are similar to the vertical accretion of mangrove forests reported by other researchers in tropical China (; ), Puerto Rico (), and the Amazon Region ().

FIGURE 2

Features of Grain Size, Total Organic Carbon, Total Nitrogen, C/N Ratio, and δ13Corg

The values of and variations in the grain size, TOC, TN, C/N ratio, and δ13Corg are shown in Figures 3A–F. The proportions of sand, silt, and clay in the entire core were 58.6 ± 14.9%, 24.1 ± 8.1%, and 17.3 ± 7.6%, respectively. The mean grain size (Mz) varied from 0.5 to 6.1 φ, with an average of 4.0 ± 1.6 φ. The TOC and TN contents were 0.67 ± 0.27% and 0.04 ± 0.02%, ranging between 0.16–1.3% and 0.01–0.08%, respectively. TOC was significantly and positively correlated with TN (TOC = 9.06 × TN + 0.25, R2 = 0.52, p < 0.01), and the short intercept implies that the impact of inorganic nitrogen could be neglected (). The C/N value varied from 9.9 to 43.0 with a mean value of 19.0 ± 7.8. The average δ13Corg value was −24.7 ± 0.6‰, ranging from −26.0 to −23.1‰. On the whole, the grain size and δ13Corg showed a finer trend and an increasing tendency since ∼3,000 cal yr BP, respectively, while the TOC, TN, and C/N collectively exhibited an abrupt change during 1,370–600 cal yr BP. Based on these vertical variations in the sediment core, it can be divided into three sections: the upper section (600–0 cal yr BP), middle section (1,370–600 cal yr BP), and lower section (3,000–1,370 cal yr BP).

FIGURE 3

In the upper section, all of the indices were relatively stable. The minimum grain size and the highest positive δ13Corg appeared in this section, with mean values of −24.0 ± 0.4‰, and 5.8 ± 0.2 φ, respectively. However, most of the indicators, especially TOC, TN, and the C/N ratio, were abnormal in the middle section. The C/N ratio was as high as 27.3 ± 9. In the lower section, TOC, TN, and δ13Corg showed an increasing trend, whereas the grain size became finer and the C/N ratio was relatively stable. The maximum grain size and lowest TOC content occurred in this section, with mean values of 3.4 ± 1.6 φ and 0.61 ± 0.28%, respectively.

Potential Sources of Organic Matter and Their Endmember Values

In general, the OM stored in marine sediments originates from autochthonous (i.e., marine production) and allochthonous contributions (i.e., terrestrial input). However, mangrove forests are also a significant contributor to the OM in mangrove coasts and adjacent seas. For example, a previous study in Qinzhou Bay reported that ∼27% of the sedimentary OM derived from mangroves (). Therefore, mangrove forests, terrestrial matter, and marine production can be considered the potential endmembers of the sources of sedimentary OM in Qinzhou Bay (Figure 4A).

FIGURE 4

; ), and oceanic endmembers (; ; Qiu, unpublished data). The error bars show the standard deviation of the endmember values. The pink empty circles in (B) are endmember values with the tolerance interval expanded by 25%.

Mangrove roots and leaf litter are important contributors to carbon stocks in mangrove sediments (; ; ). However, recent studies have shown that the values of δ13Corg and C/N of the roots are generally within the range of, or overlap, those of leaf litter (; ). Therefore, the values of δ13Corg and C/N of mangrove leaves can be regarded as endmember values of mangrove production. The average δ13Corg and C/N values of the leaves of different mangrove species (n = 30) collected along the Guangxi coasts were −28.6 ± 0.9‰ and 36.4 ± 12.5 (; ), respectively, and are consistent with those from Hainan Island in tropical China (). They can thus be reasonably regarded as the endmember in this study.

Riverine inputs, especially in small tropical catchments, contribute a large amount of terrestrial OM flux that reaches the ocean (; ). In the study region, there are two small tropical rivers, i.e., the Maoling River and the Qin River, debouching into the Qinzhou Bay. Thus, their riverine sediments (n = 6) can represent the terrestrial endmember of OM sources in this study with average values of −24.3 ± 0.6‰ for δ13Corg and 11.9 ± 0.9 for C/N (; ).

Seagrass is widely distributed in the coastal waters of Guangxi, China (), and should be considered an important part of marine production. According to previous studies, seagrass collected from Guangxi coasts (n = 19) has an average δ13Corg of −13.5 ± 0.6‰ and C/N of 27.2 ± 11.9 (Qiu, unpublished data), while marine plankton collected from the northern South China Sea (; ) has an average δ13Corg of −16.1 ± 0.8‰ and C/N of 6.5 ± 0.1. The oceanic endmember values (δ13Corg, −14.8 ± 1.3‰; C/N, 16.8 ± 10.4) of OM sources can be reasonably determined from these values.

Quantitative Estimation for Organic Matter Sources

Considering the indeterminacy of endmember values and isotopic fractionation effects in the endmember mixing model, a tolerance interval is introduced to the model, and it can be determined by the standard deviations and mean values of each endmember (; ). When the original ternary plot was expanded by a tolerance interval of 25%, more than 90% of the samples could be explained in terms of the endmember mixing model (Figure 4B), which confirms the feasibility of using this method to discriminate among the sources of OM. Notably, samples that fell outside the strict validity (i.e., original triangle in blue) of the model, but were within the expanded area (in pink), should be treated with their corresponding binary mixing model based on δ13Corg.

According to the above methods, the contributions of terrestrial organic matter (TOM), mangrove-derived organic matter (MOM), and oceanic organic matter (OOM) to OM sources of sediment core Q43 were determined (Figure 3G). TOM was the largest OM contributor with a mean value of 68.6 ± 27.6%, followed by MOM with a mean value of 24.3 ± 19.7%, and OOM with a mean value of 7.1 ± 9.3%. Like the other indicators, the compositions of the OM sources can be roughly divided into three sections: the upper section (600–0 cal yr BP), middle section (1,370–600 cal yr BP), and lower section (3,000–1,370 cal yr BP). The MOM occupied the largest proportion of OM in the middle section with mean value of 48.7 ± 23.4%.

Discussion

Effectiveness of Mangrove-Derived Organic Matter for Tracing Mangrove Development

Traditionally, the pollen content of mangroves is one of the most direct and effective proxies for tracing mangrove evaluation (; ; ). However, the MOM has been used to successfully reconstruct the histories of mangrove development at different time scales (from the Anthropocene to the Holocene) in different regions around the world, e.g., the western coast of peninsular India (), Flamenco Lagoon in Puerto Rico (), Gulf of Tonkin in tropical China (), and the Amazon estuary of northern Brazil (). A recent study has shown a relatively consistent tendency of variation and significant positive correlations (0.68–0.89, p < 0.01) between the MOM and mangrove pollen from mangrove sediment cores in different regions (). Consequently, MOM is a reliable proxy for reconstructing regional mangrove development. This index has a more significant potential to recover high-resolution mangrove development, owing to its easily fine-cut sampling and cheaper cost of equipment, than pollen and biomarkers ().

Mangrove Development Over the Past 3,000 Years

According to the variations in MOM, mangrove development in the Qinzhou Bay since ∼3,000 cal yr BP can be detailedly divided into five stages (Figures 2G, 5A). The MOM contributions were higher during the periods ∼2,200–1,750 and ∼1,370–600 cal yr BP, which indicates that the mangrove forest was flourishing. However, MOM contributions were lower in the periods ∼3,000–2,200, ∼1,750–1,370, and ∼600–0 cal yr BP, indicating that the forest had been deteriorating in these periods. To sum up, mangrove forests in Qinzhou Bay underwent two periods of flourishing and three periods of degradation over the last ∼3,000 years. Notably, the period of the greatest flourishing was ∼1,370–600 cal yr BP, with the highest MOM content of 48.7 ± 23.4%.

FIGURE 5

), and HXL () cores, respectively, in Guangxi coasts; (D–E) temperature anomaly in China () and the Northern Hemispheric (); (F) stalagmite δ18O records from Dongge Cave, SW China (); (G) variation in the global sea level over the past 3,000 cal yr BP (; ) (H) population changes in Guangdong Province (logarithmic (base 10) scale (; )); (I) Chinese dynasties and climatic stages (; ). The latter includes the Zhou Dynasty cold period (ZDCP), Qin-Han warm period (QHWP), Wei-Jin cold period (WJCP), Sui-Tang warm period (STWP), Song-Yuan warm period (SYWP), Ming-Qing cold period (MQCP), and Anthropocene warm period (AWP). The stages (Stage 1–Stage 5) of mangrove development in Qinzhou Bay are divided by vertical broken lines.

Factors Affecting Mangrove Development

From the Holocene to the Anthropocene, mangrove development (i.e., flourishing or degradation) was mainly impacted by two aspects. One is the so-called natural agents such as the sea level, climate (air temperature and rainfall), and the hydrological environment (seawater temperature, salinity, hydrodynamic conditions). Another facet is anthropogenic activities. In this section, we analyzed the factors affecting mangrove development through the comparisons between changes in MOM and natural and anthropogenic records (Figure 5). Meanwhile, a visualized model of mangrove development in Qinzhou Bay, tropical China, over the past 3,000 years has been provided (Figure 6).

FIGURE 6

Relative Sea Level

Mangrove habitats occur on intertidal shorelines in the tropics and subtropics, and are sensitive to changes in the RSL, i.e., they can migrate to landward/seaward regions with RSL rise/fall (; ). These consequences primarily depend on the balance between changes in the relative sea level and the state of the mangrove substrate (sedimentation/erosion rate) (; ; ). However, rapid changes in the RSL can upset this balance, leading to a decline in or even the disappearance of mangrove habitats. Previous studies on worldwide mangrove development during the entire Holocene have shown that the landward migration and communities succession of mangrove forests occurred from the Early to Middle Holocene, the period in which the RSL rose quickly (; ; ; ), while most mangrove forests developed in situ over the Late Holocene with a relatively stable RSL (; ). According to the variation in sea level over the past 3,000 cal yr BP (; ), the sea level in each stage of mangrove development in Qinzhou Bay varied from 0.004 to 0.37 mm yr−1 (Figure 5G). Compared with the vast fluctuation in the RSL in the Early Holocene or even the Last Glacial Period, the changes in RSL have been relatively flat since 3,000 cal yr BP, which implies that mangroves had sufficient capacity to adapt to these changes. Notably, in the Late Holocene, the sea level rose rapidly in the last 200 years. In this case, the mangrove forests still had the ability to keep pace with the RSL rise and avoid inundation via the vertical accumulation of sediments (). A previous study on Yingluo Bay in tropical China showed that mangroves had not been impacted by RSL over the last 150 years (; ). The persistence of most worldwide mangroves also implies an ability to cope with high rates of rises in the RSL. Further research suggests that mangrove forests in sites with low sedimentary supply and tidal range may be submerged as early as 2,070 (). Consequently, the changes in RSL should not have been the primary factor influencing mangrove development in Qinzhou Bay over the last 3,000 cal yr BP.

Hydrological Environment

Mangrove development can be impacted by the regional hydrological environment, such as the hydrodynamic conditions, surface seawater temperature (SST), and salinity. Variations in hydrodynamic conditions are mainly impacted by changes in the climate, RSL, and terrain. However, mangrove forests have the capacity to resist changes in hydrodynamic conditions (e.g., increased wave energy) owing to their dense and complex aerial root systems (e.g., such as prop roots and pneumatophores) (). Previous studies on the Qinzhou and Yingluo bays collectively indicate that mangrove development was little influenced by the hydrodynamic conditions during the Late Holocene (; ). Thus, this factor does not require excessive consideration in this study.

The SST is dominated by air temperature through air-sea interactions. Similar to the air temperature, an increased SST is beneficial for mangrove growth provided the temperature does not exceed its thresholds (; ). The study area is located in Qinzhou Bay (Figure 1), and its seawater salinity is primarily diluted by freshwater input from the Maoling and Qin rivers. Decreased precipitation can result in a decrease in groundwater discharge and surface freshwater water input (), and can cause an increase in seawater salinity. Increased salinity is likely to cause a conversion of upper tidal zones to hypersaline flats, which poses a significant threat to the mangrove habitats (). On the whole, the effects of the SST and salinity on mangrove development ultimately depend on air temperature and rainfall, owing to the coupling relationship between them.

Air Temperature and Rainfall

As observed in most global locations, mangroves are prone to inhabit lower latitudes with higher temperature and precipitation (; ). For instance, the same mangrove species (e.g., Rhizophora sp.) can reach up to 30 m in the Amazon region (0.7°S; ), whereas its average height in Guangxi (∼21°N) is merely about 3 m. Therefore, air temperature and rainfall are expected to control mangrove development by impacting their diversity, productivity, and area (; ; ).

In Guangxi Province, SW China, rainfall is controlled by the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM), changes in which during the Holocene can be reconstructed by high-resolution stalagmite δ18O records from the Dongge Cave in SW China (Figures 1C, 5F; ). The negative excursion of δ18O value indicates a general increase in the strength of the EASM and rainfall, and vice versa. If rainfall is the main factor controlling the development of local mangroves, sections of the negative excursion of the δ18O value should correspond to periods of mangroves flourishing. Our results show that stages of relatively negative excursion of δ18O (∼2,200–1,750 and ∼1,370–600 cal yr BP) correspond to the periods of mangrove flourishing (Stage 2 and Stage 4), while sections with positive δ18O (∼1,750–1,370 and ∼600–200 cal yr BP) correspond to the periods of mangrove deterioration (Stage 3 and early Stage 5). However, these corresponding relationships are not prominent, and the stages of negative excursion of δ18O (∼3,000–2,200 and ∼200–0 cal yr BP) unconventionally correspond to the periods of deterioration of mangroves (Stage 1 and late Stage 5). Therefore, rainfall induced by the EASM may not have been the dominant factor in mangrove development since 3,000 cal yr BP. In other words, mangrove development can, but only in part, be ascribed to changes in rainfall.

Previous study has reconstructed Holocene temperature anomaly in China (Figure 5D; ), and have found that its tendency is consistent with temperature variation in the Northern Hemisphere over the last two millennia (Figure 5E; ). Based on the reconstructed temperature changes and historical records, the China’s climate can be roughly divided into three cold periods and four warm periods (Figure 5I; ; ). The cold periods mainly include the Zhou Dynasty cold period (ZDCP), Wei-Jin cold period (WJCP, i.e., Dark Ages Cold Period), and Ming-Qing cold period (MQCP, i.e., Little Ice Age), while the warm periods mainly contain the Qin-Han warm period (QHWP), Sui-Tang warm period (STWP), Song-Yuan warm period (SYWP, i.e., Medieval Warm Period), and Anthropocene warm period (AWP). If air temperature is the main factor controlling mangrove development, these cold/warm climate periods ought to correspond to the stages of mangrove deterioration/flourishing, respectively. Our results show that the three periods of mangrove deterioration (stages 1, 3, and 5) approximately correspond to the ZDCP, WJCP, and MQCP, whereas the two periods of mangrove flourishing (stages 2 and 4) approximately correspond to the QHWP and STWP-SYWP, respectively (Figure 5). Notably, the STWP is one of the warmest period in Chinese climate history (), which promoted the appearances of two famous flourishing ages (i.e., the Zhen Guan and Kai Yuan periods) in Chinese history. Owing to the collective occurrences of the STWP and SYWP in Stage 4 (∼1,370–600 cal yr BP), this stage featured the greatest flourishing of mangroves since 3,000 cal yr BP, although a transitory cold period occurred in the middle. Overall, the variation in air temperature is undoubtedly the dominant factor controlling mangrove development in Qinzhou Bay over the last 3,000 cal yr BP (Figures 6A–E). Corresponding relationships between the stages of mangrove development and temperature periods in Qinzhou Bay (Figures 1A,B, 5C; ) and Yingluo Bay (Figures 1B, 5B; ), tropical China, were very similar to our results, which further proves the controlling role of temperature in mangrove development.

However, another problem worth discussing is that the last warm period (AWP) corresponds to a stage of mangrove deterioration (late Stage 5), which implies that other factors might have influenced mangrove development.

Human Activities

Preindustrial mangrove utilization likely did not alter the extent and habitat quality of mangrove forests to a substantial degree, but the effects of human beings on mangrove resources have increased in the past few centuries and peaked in the 20th century (). As much as 35% of the world’s mangrove areas had been lost by the 1980s and 1990s (). Human threats on mangrove dynamics include pollution, overexploitation, and conversion to aquaculture and agriculture (; ; ). In Guangxi, the population has rapidly risen over the last two centuries, similar to that in an adjacent province, Guangdong (Figure 5H; ). With the population growth, the mangroves area abruptly decreased from 23,904 to 9,351 ha by 1955 (), of which 97.6% was converted into aquaculture ponds (). These realities explain the persistent mangrove degradation in late Stage 5 (∼50 cal yr BP to present), i.e., the rapid temperature rise should have promoted mangroves flourishment during the AWP just as in other warm periods in history, but this was reversed by the increase in the intensity of human activities, especially the expansion of aquaculture ponds (Figure 6F). Likewise, mangrove degradation occurred at a site (HXL) located in mangrove interior of the Qinzhou Bay during the AWP (Figures 1A,B, 5C; ). Interestingly, the records of core YLW02 showed that mangroves were flourishing in Yingluo Bay during the AWP (Figures 1B, 5B; ). Yingluo Bay is located far from industrial areas, city centers, and river basins, such that population-related negative disturbances can be ignored (). Therefore, mangrove development in Yingluo Bay has continued to be controlled by temperature rather than human activities since the Anthropocene.

Conclusion

The contributions of terrestrial organic matter, MOM, and oceanic organic matter to OM sources of sediment core Q43 were quantified here by using endmember mixing models based on δ13C and C/N. The MOM is considered a reliable proxy for reconstructing regional mangrove development. The variations in MOM in Qinzhou Bay over the past ∼3,000 cal yr BP indicate that the mangrove forests underwent two periods of flourishing: ∼2,200–1,750 cal yr BP (Stage 2) and ∼1,370–600 cal yr BP (Stage 4), and three periods of deterioration: ∼3,000–2,200 cal yr BP (Stage 1), ∼1,750–1,370 cal yr BP (Stage 3), and ∼600–0 cal yr BP (Stage 5). Of the potential factors that impact mangrove development, the RSL changes and the regional hydrological environment (e.g., seawater temperature, salinity, and hydrodynamic conditions) did not have notable effects on mangrove flourishing/degradation. However, climate change, especially variations in the air temperature variations, was the primary factor controlling mangrove development. The stages of mangrove flourishing/deterioration corresponded to warm/cold periods of the Chinese climate, respectively. Notably, the rapid air temperature rise should have promoted mangrove development during the AWP, just as in other warm periods in history, but this trend was reversed by the increase in the intensity of human activities, especially the expansion of aquaculture ponds.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

YZ contributed to laboratory analysis, data analysis, and manuscript writing; XM contributed to project design and method establishment; PX and ZL contributed to field investigation and laboratory analysis; All authors have reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41976068 and 41576061).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Guanglong Qiu from the Guangxi Mangrove Research Center for providing raw data of seagrass.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer (LL) declared a shared affiliation with several of the authors, (XM, PX, ZL), to the handling editor at time of review.

References

  • 1

    AlongiD. M. (2014). Carbon Cycling and Storage in Mangrove Forests. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci.6, 195219. 10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020

  • 2

    AlongiD. M. (2020). Global Significance of Mangrove Blue Carbon in Climate Change Mitigation (Version 1). Sci2, 57. 10.3390/sci2030057

  • 3

    AlongiD. M. (2008). Mangrove Forests: Resilience, Protection From Tsunamis, and Responses to Global Climate Change. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.76, 113. 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024

  • 4

    BaoH.WuY.UngerD.DuJ.HerbeckL. S.ZhangJ. (2013). Impact of the Conversion of Mangroves Into Aquaculture Ponds on the Sedimentary Organic Matter Composition in a Tidal Flat Estuary (Hainan Island, China). Cont. Shelf Res.57, 8291. 10.1016/j.csr.2012.06.016

  • 5

    BouillonS.BoregsA. V.Castañda-MoyaE.DieleK.DittmarT.DukeN. C.et al (2008). Mangrove Production and Carbon Sinks: A Revision of Global Budget Estimates. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles22, 112. 10.1029/2007gb003052

  • 6

    CaratiniC.BentalebI.FontugneM.Morzadec-KerfournM. T.PascalJ. P.TissotC. (1994). A Less Humid Climate Since ca. 3500 yr B.P. from Marine Cores Off Karwar, Western India. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.109 (2–4), 371384. 10.1016/0031-0182(94)90186-4

  • 7

    ChenL.WangW.ZhangY.LinG. (2009). Recent Progresses in Mangrove Conservation, Restoration and Research in China. J. Plant Ecol.2 (2), 4554. 10.1093/jpe/rtp009

  • 8

    CohenM. C. L.LaraR. J.CuevasE.OliverasE. M.Da Silveira SternbergL. (2016). Effects of Sea-Level Rise and Climatic Changes on Mangroves from Southwestern Littoral of Puerto Rico During the Middle and Late Holocene. Catena143, 187200. 10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.041

  • 9

    DittmarT.LaraR. J.KattnerG. (2001). River or Mangrove? Tracing Major Organic Matter Sources in Tropical Brazilian Coastal Waters. Mar. Chem.73 (3–4), 253271. 10.1016/s0304-4203(00)00110-9

  • 10

    DongY.LiY.KongF.ZhangJ.XiM. (2020). Source, Structural Characteristics and Ecological Indication of Dissolved Organic Matter Extracted From Sediments in the Primary Tributaries of the Dagu River. Ecol. Indic.109, 105776. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105776

  • 11

    DuarteC. M.ArabiaS. (2017). Reviews and Syntheses: Hidden Forests, the Role of Vegetated Coastal Habitats in the Ocean Carbon Budget. Biogeosciences14, 301310. 10.5194/bg-14-301-2017

  • 12

    DuarteC. M.LosadaI. J.HendriksI. E.MazarrasaI.MarbàN. (2013). The Role of Coastal Plant Communities for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change3, 961968. 10.1038/nclimate1970

  • 13

    DuarteC. M.MiddelburgJ. J.CaracoN. (2005). Major Role of Marine Vegetation on the Oceanic Carbon Cycle. Biogeosciences2, 18. 10.5194/bg-2-1-2005

  • 14

    DukeN. C.BallM. C.EllisonJ. C. (1998). Factors Influencing Biodiversity and Distributional Gradients in Mangroves. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett.7 (1), 2747. 10.2307/2997695

  • 15

    DukeN. C.MeyneckeJ.-O.DittmannS.EllisonA. M.AngerK.BergerU.et al (2007). A World Without Mangroves?Science317, 41b42b. 10.1126/science.317.5834.41b

  • 16

    EllisonJ. C. (2008). Long-Term Retrospection on Mangrove Development Using Sediment Cores and Pollen Analysis: A Review. Aquat. Bot.89, 93104. 10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.02.007

  • 17

    EllisonJ. C.StoddartD. R. (1991). Mangrove Ecosystem Collapse During Predicted Sea-Level Rise: Holocene Analogues and Implications. J. Coast. Res.7 (1), 151165. 10.2307/4297812

  • 18

    EllisonJ. C. (2014). Vulnerability Assessment of Mangroves to Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise Impacts. Wet. Ecol. Manag.23, 115137. 10.1007/s11273-014-9397-8

  • 19

    FanH. Q. (1995). Mangrove Resources, Human Disturbance and Rehabilitation Action in China. Chin. Biodiv.3 (Suppl. 1), 4954.

  • 20

    FrançaM. C.FrancisquiniM. I.CohenM. C. L.PessendaL. C. R. (2013). Inter-Proxy Evidence for the Development of the Amazonian Mangroves During the Holocene. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot.23 (5), 527542. 10.1007/s00334-013-0420-4

  • 21

    FriessD. A.RogersK.LovelockC. E.KraussK. W.HamiltonS. E.LeeS. Y.et al (2019). The State of the World's Mangrove Forests: Past, Present, and Future. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.44, 89115. 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033302

  • 22

    GeQ.FangX.ZhengJ. (2014). Learning From the Historical Impacts of Climatic Change in China. Adv. Earth Sci.29, 2329. 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.01.0023

  • 23

    GilmanE.EllisonJ.ColemanR. (2007). Assessment of Mangrove Response to Projected Relative Sea-Level Rise and Recent Historical Reconstruction of Shoreline Position. Environ. Monit. Assess.124, 105130. 10.1007/s10661-006-9212-y

  • 24

    GilmanE. L.EllisonJ.DukeN. C.FieldC. (2008). Threats to Mangroves From Climate Change and Adaptation Options: A Review. Aquat. Bot.89, 237250. 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.009

  • 25

    GiriC.OchiengE.TieszenL. L.ZhuZ.SinghA.LovelandT.et al (2011). Status and Distribution of Mangrove Forests of the World Using Earth Observation Satellite Data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.20, 154159. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x

  • 26

    GoñiM. A.RuttenbergK. C.EglintonT. I. (1998). A Reassessment of the Sources and Importance of Land-Derived Organic Matter in Surface Sediments from the Gulf of Mexico. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta62 (18), 30553075. 10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00217-8

  • 27

    GonneeaM. E.PaytanA.Herrera-SilveiraJ. A. (2004). Tracing Organic Matter Sources and Carbon Burial in Mangrove Sediments Over the Past 160 Years. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.61, 211227. 10.1016/j.ecss.2004.04.015

  • 28

    HatjeV.MasquéP.PatireV. F.DóreaA.BarrosF. (2020). Blue Carbon Stocks, Accumulation Rates, and Associated Spatial Variability in Brazilian Mangroves. Limnol. Oceanogr.1, 114. 10.1002/lno.11607

  • 29

    HerbeckL. S.UngerD.KrummeU.LiuS. M.JennerjahnT. C. (2011). Typhoon-Induced Precipitation Impact on Nutrient and Suspended Matter Dynamics of a Tropical Estuary Affected by Human Activities in Hainan, China. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.93, 375388. 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.05.004

  • 30

    HernesP. J.DydaR. Y.McDowellW. H. (2017). Connecting Tropical River DOM and POM to the Landscape With Lignin. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta219, 143159. 10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.028

  • 31

    Himes-CornellA.GroseS. O.PendletonL. (2018). Mangrove Ecosystem Service Values and Methodological Approaches to Valuation: Where Do We Stand?. Front. Mar. Sci.5, 376. 10.3389/fmars.2018.00376

  • 32

    HouG. L.FangX. Q. (2011). Characteristics of Holocene Temperature Change in ChinaProg. Geogr.30 (9), 10751080. [in Chinese with English abstract]. 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.09.001

  • 33

    FanH. Q.ChenG. H.HeB. Y.MoZ. C. (Editors) (2005). Coastal Wetland and Management of Shankou Mangroves. (Beijing, China: China Ocean Press), 3589.

  • 34

    HuangC.ZengT.YeF.XieL.WangZ.WeiG.et al (2018). Natural and Anthropogenic Impacts on Environmental Changes Over the Past 7500 Years Based on the Multi-Proxy Study of Shelf Sediments in the Northern South China Sea. Quat. Sci. Rev.197, 3548. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.08.005

  • 35

    JennerjahnT. C. (2012). Biogeochemical Response of Tropical Coastal Systems to Present and Past Environmental Change. Earth Sci. Rev.114, 1941. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.04.005

  • 36

    JennerjahnT. C.IttekkotV. (2002). Relevance of Mangroves for the Production and Deposition of Organic Matter Along Tropical Continental Margins. Sci. Nat.89, 2330. 10.1007/s00114-001-0283-x

  • 37

    JennerjahnT. C. (2021). Relevance and Magnitude of 'Blue Carbon' Storage in Mangrove Sediments: Carbon Accumulation Rates vs. Stocks, Sources vs. Sinks. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.248, 107156. 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107156

  • 38

    KempA. C.WrightA. J.EdwardsR. J.BarnettR. L.BrainM. J.KoppR. E.et al (2018). Relative Sea-Level Change in Newfoundland, Canada During the Past ∼3000 Years. Quat. Sci. Rev.201, 89110. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.10.012

  • 39

    KusumaningtyasM. A.HutahaeanA. A.FischerH. W.Pérez-MayoM.RansbyD.JennerjahnT. C. (2019). Variability in the Organic Carbon Stocks, Sources, and Accumulation Rates of Indonesian Mangrove Ecosystems. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.218, 310323. 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.12.007

  • 40

    LeeS. Y.PrimaveraJ. H.Dahdouh-GuebasF.McKeeK.BosireJ. O.CannicciS.et al (2014). Ecological Role and Services of Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems: a Reassessment. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.23, 726743. 10.1111/geb.12155

  • 41

    LiZ.SaitoY.MaoL.TamuraT.LiZ.SongB.et al (2012). Mid-Holocene Mangrove Succession and its Response to Sea-Level Change in the Upper Mekong River Delta, Cambodia. Quat. Res.78, 386399. 10.1016/j.yqres.2012.07.001

  • 42

    LiZ.ZhangZ.LiJ.ZhangY.LiZ.LiuL.et al (2008). Pollen Distribution in Surface Sediments of a Mangrove System, Yingluo Bay, Guangxi, China. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.152, 2131. 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2008.04.001

  • 43

    LiuY.WangX.WenQ.ZhuN. (2019). Identifying Sources and Variations of Organic Matter in an Urban River in Beijing, China Using Stable Isotope Analysis. Ecol. Indic.102, 783790. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.023

  • 44

    LiuZ.ZhaoY.ColinC.StatteggerK.WiesnerM. G.HuhC.-A.et al (2016). Source-to-Sink Transport Processes of Fluvial Sediments in the South China Sea. Earth Sci. Rev.153, 238273. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.005

  • 45

    LjungqvistF. C. (2010). A New Reconstruction of Temperature Variability in the Extra‐Tropical Northern Hemisphere during the Last Two Millennia. Geogr. Ann. Ser. A. Phys. Geogr.92 (3), 339351. 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2010.00399.x

  • 46

    LovelockC. E.CahoonD. R.FriessD. A.GuntenspergenG. R.KraussK. W.ReefR.et al (2015). The Vulnerability of Indo-Pacific Mangrove Forests to Sea-Level Rise. Nature526, 559563. 10.1038/nature15538

  • 47

    MatosC. R. L.BerrêdoJ. F.MachadoW.SandersC. J.MetzgerE.CohenM. C. L. (2020). Carbon and Nutrient Accumulation in Tropical Mangrove Creeks, Amazon Region. Mar. Geol.429, 106317. 10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106317

  • 48

    MengX.XiaP.LiZ.LiuL. (2016a). Mangrove Forest Degradation Indicated by Mangrove-Derived Organic Matter in the Qinzhou Bay, Guangxi, China, and its Response to the Asian Monsoon During the Holocene Climatic Optimum. Acta Oceanol. Sin.35, 95100. 10.1007/s13131-015-0778-5

  • 49

    MengX.XiaP.LiZ.MengD. (2016b). Mangrove Degradation and Response to Anthropogenic Disturbance in the Maowei Sea (SW China) Since 1926 AD: Mangrove-Derived OM and Pollen. Org. Geochem.98, 166175. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.06.001

  • 50

    MengX.XiaP.LiZ.MengD. (2017). Mangrove Development and its Response to Asian Monsoon in the Yingluo Bay (SW China) Over the Last 2000 Years. Estuar. Coasts40, 540552. 10.1007/s12237-016-0156-3

  • 51

    MengX. W.ZhangC. Z. (2014). Basic Situations of Marine Environment and Resources in Guangxi. (Beijing, China: China Ocean Press), 522.

  • 52

    MillerK. G.SchmelzW. J.BrowningJ. V.KoppR. E.MountainG. S.WrightJ. D. (2020). Ancient Sea Level as Key to the Future. Oceanography33, 3241. 10.5670/oceanog.2020.224

  • 53

    MoyerR. P.BauerJ. E.GrottoliA. G. (2013). Carbon Isotope Biogeochemistry of Tropical Small Mountainous River, Estuarine, and Coastal Systems of Puerto Rico. Biogeochemistry112 (13), 589612. 10.1007/s10533-012-9751-y

  • 54

    NellemannC.CorcoranE.DuarteC.ValdesL.YoungC. D.FonsecaL.et al (2009). Blue Carbon: The Role of Healthy Oceans in Binding Carbon. (Arendal, Norway: United Nations Environment Programme), 1165.

  • 55

    ParkinsonR. W.DelauneR. D.WhiteJ. R. (1994). Holocene Sea-Level Rise and the Fate of Mangrove Forests Within the Wider Caribbean Region. J. Coast. Res.10, 10771086. 10.2307/4298297

  • 56

    ReimerP. J.BardE.BaylissA.BeckJ. W.BlackwellP. G.RamseyC. B.et al (2013). IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0-50,000 Years Cal BP. Radiocarbon55, 18691887. 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947

  • 57

    SasmitoS. D.KuzyakovY.LubisA. A.MurdiyarsoD.HutleyL. B.BachriS.et al (2020). Organic Carbon Burial and Sources in Soils of Coastal Mudflat and Mangrove Ecosystems. Catena187, 104414. 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104414

  • 58

    SoaresM. L. G. (2009). A Conceptual Model for the Responses of Mangrove Forests to Sea Level Rise. J. Coast. Res.56, 267271. 10.2307/25737579

  • 59

    SouthonJ.KashgarianM.FontugneM.MetivierB.W-S YimW. (2002). Marine Reservoir Corrections for the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia. Radiocarbon44, 167180. 10.1017/s0033822200064778

  • 60

    UrregoL. E.Correa-MetrioA.GonzálezC.CastañoA. R.YokoyamaY. (2013). Contrasting Responses of Two Caribbean Mangroves to Sea-Level Rise in the Guajira Peninsula (Colombian Caribbean). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.370, 92102. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.11.023

  • 61

    ValielaI.BowenJ. L.YorkJ. K. (2001). Mangrove Forests: One of the World's Threatened Major Tropical Environments. BioScience51 (10), 807815. 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0807:mfootw]2.0.co;2

  • 62

    VaughnD. R.BianchiT. S.ShieldsM. R.KenneyW. F.OsborneT. Z. (2021). Blue Carbon Soil Stock Development and Estimates Within Northern Florida Wetlands. Front. Earth Sci.9, 552721. 10.3389/feart.2021.552721

  • 63

    VeettilB. K.WardR. D.QuangN. X.TrangN. T. T.GiangT. H. (2019). Mangroves of Vietnam: Historical Development, Current State of Research and Future Threats. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.218, 212236. 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.12.021

  • 64

    WangY.ChengH.EdwardsR. L.HeY.KongX.AnZ.et al (2005). The Holocene Asian Monsoon: Links to Solar Changes and North Atlantic Climate. Science308, 854857. 10.1126/science.1106296

  • 65

    WoodroffeC. D.RogersK.McKeeK. L.LovelockC. E.MendelssohnI. A.SaintilanN. (2016). Mangrove Sedimentation and Response to Relative Sea-Level Rise. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci.8, 243266. 10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-034025

  • 66

    XiaP.MengX.LiZ.FengA.YinP.ZhangY. (2015). Mangrove Development and its Response to Environmental Change in Yingluo Bay (SW China) During the Last 150 years: Stable Carbon Isotopes and Mangrove Pollen. Org. Geochem.85, 3241. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.04.003

  • 67

    XiaP.MengX.LiZ.ZhiP.ZhaoM.WangE. (2019). Late Holocene Mangrove Development and Response to Sea Level Change in the Northwestern South China Sea. Acta Oceanol. Sin.38, 111120. 10.1007/s13131-019-1359-9

  • 68

    XiaP.MengX.ZhangY.ZhangJ.LiZ.WangW. (2021). The Potential of Mangrove-Derived Organic Matter in Sediments for Tracing Mangrove Development During the Holocene. Estuar. Coast.44, 10201035. 10.1007/s12237-020-00826-w

  • 69

    XueB.YanC.LuH.BaiY. (2009). Mangrove-Derived Organic Carbon in Sediment from Zhangjiang Estuary (China) Mangrove Wetland. J. Coast. Res.254, 949956. 10.2112/08-1047.1

  • 70

    ZhangY.MengX.BaiY.WangX.XiaP.YangG.et al (2021). Sources and Features of Particulate Organic Matter in Tropical Small Mountainous Rivers (SW China) Under the Effects of Anthropogenic Activities. Ecol. Indic.125, 107471. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107471

  • 71

    ZhaoW.XieS. (1988). Population History of China. Beijing, China: People’s Press

  • 72

    ZhuK. Z. (1973). A Preliminary Study on the Climatic Change during the Last 5000 Years in China. Sci. Sin. (B)16, 226256. [in Chinese with English abstract].

Summary

Keywords

organic matter source, mangrove-derived organic matter, mangrove development, air temperature, anthropogenic activity, late Holocene

Citation

Zhang Y, Meng X, Xia P and Li Z (2021) Response of Mangrove Development to Air Temperature Variation Over the Past 3000 Years in Qinzhou Bay, Tropical China. Front. Earth Sci. 9:678189. doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.678189

Received

09 March 2021

Accepted

05 May 2021

Published

25 May 2021

Volume

9 - 2021

Edited by

Min-Te Chen, National Taiwan Ocean University, Taiwan

Reviewed by

Lejun Liu, Ministry of Natural Resources, China

Chuanxiu Luo, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Hasrizal Shaari, University of Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Xianwei Meng, Peng Xia,

Present address: Zhen Li, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

This article was submitted to Quaternary Science, Geomorphology and Paleoenvironment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics