Abstract
Thrust fault-related landforms, smooth plains units, and impact craters and basins have all been observed on the surface of Mercury. While tectonic landforms point to a long-lived history of global cooling and contraction, smooth plains units have been inferred to represent more punctuated periods of effusive volcanism. The timings of these processes are inferred through impact cratering records to have overlapped, yet the stress regimes implied by the processes are contradictory. Effusive volcanism on Mercury is believed to have produced flood basalts through dikes, the propagation of which is dependent on being able to open and fill vertical tensile cracks when horizontal stresses are small. On the contrary, thrust faults propagate when at least one horizontal stress is very large relative to the vertical compressive stress. We made sense of conflicting stress regimes through modeling with frictional faulting theory and Earth analogue work. Frictional faulting theory equations predict that the minimum and maximum principal stresses have a predictable relationship when thrust faulting is observed. The Griffith Criterion and Kirsch equations similarly predict a relationship between these stresses when tensile fractures are observed. Together, both sets of equations limit the range of stresses possible when dikes and thrusts are observed and permitted us to calculate deviatoric stresses for regions of Earth and Mercury. Deviatoric stress was applied to test a physical model for dike propagation distance in the horizontally compressive stress regime of the Columbia River Flood Basalt Province, an Earth analogue for Borealis Planitia, the northern smooth plains, of Mercury. By confirming that dike propagation distances from sources observed in the province can be generated with the physical model, we confidently apply the model to confirm that dikes on Mercury can propagate in a horizontally compressive stress regime and calculate the depth to the source for the plains materials. Results imply that dikes could travel from ∼89 km depth to bring material from deep within the lithosphere to the surface, and that Mercury’s lithosphere is mechanically layered, with only the uppermost layer being weak.
1 Introduction
The geologic history of Mercury has been dominated by global contraction—a reduction in the volume of the planet due to cooling (). This process, along with possible others like tidal despinning, polar reorientation, and changes in orbital characteristics, have resulted in a global population of thrust faults inferred from thousands of observations of thrust fault-related landforms (; ). These landforms deform Mercury’s entire surface including smooth plains units (; ). Smooth plains units are inferred to be of flood volcanic origins and likely emplaced through diking (; ; ); however, no vents or exposed dikes have been observed. Volcanic plains cover 40% of Mercury’s surface (). The density of thrust fault-related landforms is lower in the smooth plains compared to the rest of the planet’s surface (; ). Still, many studies observe linear to arcuate, high topography landforms occasionally bounded by surface breaking faults cross cutting smooth plains units (e.g., ). Impact craters and basins are observed cutting and crosscut by thrust fault-related landforms and plains deposits (; ), highlighting the longest-lived process effecting the terrestrial planet’s surface—impact cratering.
Stratigraphic relationships of thrust fault-related landforms and Smooth Plains deposits indicate that global contraction both preceded and continued after the effusive volcanism that produced the plains (; ; ). The oldest thrust fault-related landforms are crosscut by impact craters estimated to have formed during the Tolstojan Period [∼3.9–3.7 Ga, ]. Thus, faults must have begun propagating and global contraction operating prior to this time (). The youngest thrust-fault related landforms are estimated to be less than 50 Ma due to their small sizes and crisp morphologies (). Based on the stratigraphic relationships of thrust fault-related landforms and aged impact craters, global contraction was most active during and before the Calorian period (3.9–3.25 Ga or 3.7–1.7 Ga); (; ; ). The magnitude of estimated strain rates due to global contraction for these periods depends on the length of the time period used in the calculation; however, estimates of the absolute age limits for time periods vary (; ). Applying the time systems from , the Calorian ended ∼3.25 Ga, and a quieter period of global contraction began. Unlike the long history of global contraction, the Smooth Plains have been estimated to be emplaced in <100 Ma, between 3.1 and 3.9 Ga (; ).
Although the periods of strongest global contraction and volcanism overlap, the stress regimes implied by these processes are contradictory (Figure 1). The causal stresses associated with both processes can be broken down simplistically into three perpendicular, principal compressive stresses: two horizontal stresses (SH and Sh where SH > Sh) and one vertical stress (Sv).
FIGURE 1
Stresses expected to produce a global population of thrust faults must be strongly horizontally compressive (
In some settings, effusive volcanic deposits have been attributed to sill complexes and sill-fed dikes. For example, flood basalts in the Ferrar Large Igneous Province (LIP) were at least partially emplaced by sill-fed dikes at shallow depths (
In such models, effusive volcanism is a process attributed to sub-vertical to vertical dikes bringing magma to the surface (
From observations of thrust fault-related landforms and plains deposits, two stress regimes are then possible: SH > Sh > Sv and SH > Sv > Sh—with the first regime limiting the ability for magma to be transported to the surface and the second preventing the formation of thrust faults. In this paper, we make sense of these conflicting stress regimes using frictional faulting theory and deduce that diking must have happened in a horizontally compressive stress regime. We then use Earth analogues to 1) confirm that such a scenario is possible on a large scale to produce a massive flood basalt province and 2) derive depths for potential sources for the flood basalts that produced Mercury’s Smooth Plains.
2 Methods
A three-step methodology allowed us to address dike propagation in the horizontally compressive stress setting of a globally contracting Mercury. First, we queried frictional faulting theory to determine the stress state of the planet and the possibility that diking could occur in a horizontally compressive regime. We then test the viability of dike propagation by applying an equation for the distance that dikes propagate in a compressed, physical analogue model to an Earth analogue setting. Finally, with confidence, we apply this model to Mercury to calculate the propagation distance for dikes that produced the smooth plains units.
2.1 Dike Propagation in a Compressive Stress Regime
Frictional faulting theory is a set of equations that relate the three principal compressive stresses and that when satisfied, indicate if and what type of faults can form (
FIGURE 2

A graphical representation of frictional faulting theory (adapted from
Tensile cracks can form in compression, parallel to the greatest principal stress (
When neglecting pore pressure (Pp), closely follows the frictional faulting equation (and edge in the Zoback polygon) for strike-slip faults. Note that by increasing the slope of this line to 5.88, one can show the relationship between stresses for the Griffith Criterion. The window, or range of stresses between the Kirsch equation and the Griffith Criterion overlaps the polygon. This window is visualized as the light blue zone overlapping the polygon in Figure 2. Most of this window overlaps with the strike-slip portion of the polygon indicating that tensile cracks can propagate in transpressive stress settings. However, some portion of this window intersects the upper edge of the polygon describing stresses associated with reverse and thrust faulting. This treatment of tensile crack propagation does not address stresses under which cracks can open in extensional stress domains.
It follows that in theory, the stress relationships described by the intersection of these two equations must closely reflect the relative stresses associated with global contraction and effusive volcanism: SH >> Sh ≥ Sv. Dikes must be able to propagate in a compressive stress regime when the vertical stress is minimum but similar in magnitude to the minimum horizontal stress.
2.1.1 Numerical and Physical Models of Dike Propagation
Numerical models of dike propagation have shown the prediction of propagation direction to be influenced by many factors over the last 2 decades (
Physical models have shown that dikes can propagate in compressive stress regimes (
The vertical propagation distance, d, was found to be a function of the tensile strength of the host rock (Ts), density difference between the magma and the host rock (∆ρ), gravity (g), and the deviatoric or differential stress . Other models for sill transition involve the dike reaching neutral buoyancy, magma stalling or pooling at levels where the density contrast between the magma and surrounding rock is too low (
This equation was derived from laboratory experiments, and we were unable to locate studies in which it was directly tested against observations of volcanic systems. The experiments neglected the driving force for vertical propagation that may come from the overpressure of the dikes’ source (
Based on the frictional faulting equation for reverse faults and the modified Kirsch equation, we can estimate a minimum differential stress to be the difference between SH and Sv. If SH is 3.1 Sv, then the difference in stress must be 2.1 Sv for locations on Mercury’s surface where thrusts and dikes were simultaneously active. Before applying this equation to Mercury to derive potential distances for smooth plains dikes, we must determine if this is applicable to Earth. We therefore investigate if the equation could accurately reproduce the estimated necessary depths for sources of large-scale flood basalt provinces on Earth.
2.2 Earth Analogue Diking and Faulting
Dikes must be able to propagate from depth and produce enough magma to be a viable source for a large volcanic province. While
The smooth plains of Mercury, and Borealis Planitia, the northern smooth plains, in particular, share important similarities with the Columbia River Basalt and Yakima Fold Provinces. The smooth plains are volcanically emplaced units with mafic, presumed basaltic, composition covering a laterally extensive region (5.59 × 106 km2) in ∼0–2 km of volcanic material (
FIGURE 3

This figure compares the geomorphology, subsurface structural interpretation, and timing of formation for thrust fault-related landforms in Mercury’s smooth plains units (A) and faults and folds of the Yakima Fold Province (B). Both sets of structures have been modeled with listric thrusts that root into sub-basalt units and both likely formed topographic expressions during volcanism (
The Columbia River Flood Basalt Province is an extensive flood basalt province often tied to crustal extension and melting due to the mantle plume also associated with the Snake River Plain Hot Spot Track (
The Columbia River Flood Basalt Province is also a superb analogue because of the abundance of mapped dikes associated with basalt emplacement. Three main dike swarms have been described: the oldest, Steens Mountain dikes which sourced the southernmost flows, the younger, Monument dikes to the northwest of Steens Mountain, and the youngest and largest Chief Joseph dikes to the north (
A new digitized dataset compiled from the fieldnotes of Columbia River Basalt researcher Dr. W. H. Taubeneck contains the location and description of many identified dikes. Combined with other vectorized Columbia River Basalt dikes from other dike swarms,
We utilized a Geographic Information System and ESRI’s ArcMap to perform analyses on the dike data. All dikes and dike swarms from the dataset were combined into a single shapefile in ArcMap for analysis. The Data Management Toolbox was then used to divide each dike into 500 m long separate segments. Each segment was assigned a unique identification number and row in the new shapefile. Dividing dikes, especially very long dikes (>100 km), into segments allowed us to reflect the changing geologic conditions that might lead to varying propagation distance estimates along the length of a single dike.
Parameters were then added to this shapefile. The physically modeled equation for propagation distance relies on estimates for density of the dike magma and tensile strength and density of the dikes’ host rocks. Dike composition (usually basaltic but sometimes andesitic basalt) was recorded in the Morriss et al. combined dataset, and 2.7 g/cm3, an average density for flood basalt lavas was used (
The geologic maps were used to identify the rock type through which the dikes propagated. We divided the rock mass through which the dikes propagated into a basement and bedrock layered stratigraphy. Seismic and well data for the Yakima fold Province suggest bedrock-basement contacts near 8 km (
Basement composition was assumed to be gabbro west of the Hite fault and granite east of the Hite fault, the boundary between accreted ocean crust and the North American craton (
Dike propagation distance, d, was calculated for each dike segment. In order to calculate d, we first needed to estimate the vertical stress Sv, associated with thrust fault propagation. Based on previous estimates, thrust faults were believed to propagate upward from ∼4 km or deeper (
The d value was added to the shapefile so that dike segments could be color coded by their propagation distance. The distances and trends in distances for dikes in the Columbia River Basalt Province were compared to previously established estimates. Similarities (discussed in section 3 Results) supported the application of the equation for propagation distance to Mercury’s Smooth Plains.
2.3 Estimating Dike Propagation Distance for Mercury
Dike propagation distance was calculated for Mercury’s smooth plains using the equation for d. Gravity on Mercury was taken to be 3.71 m/s2. Tensile strength for the presumed basaltic surface composition was taken to be 14.9 MPa (
The vertical and horizontal stresses at depth for Mercury were derived from our knowledge of frictional faulting theory and stresses associated with the topographic load of smooth plains emplacement. Topographic load was considered as this factor would have increased the vertical stresses for thrust faults to overcome and has been shown to affect the magnitude and orientation of principal stresses (
FIGURE 4

These graphs depict the maximum and minimum principal stresses associated with the (left) load of a 50 km-wide, 4 km-deep section of thick northern smooth plains deposits, (center) superimposed tectonic and load stresses, and (right) tectonic stresses necessary to produce thrust faults in the stress context of the smooth plains. Only the right half of the affected space is shown. Stress tensors associated with each scenario are also provided where σxxL, σzzL, and are horizontal, vertical, and shear stresses associated with the load, Sv and SH are the vertical and horizontal stresses associated with thrust faulting, and σ1 and σ3 are the total principal stresses.
The vertical stress at the depth of thrust fault initiation (2.5 km) due to a rock mass with a bulk basalt density of 2,850 kg/m3 is ∼64 MPa, and horizontal stresses associated with loading and tectonic activity were estimated to be ∼39 and ∼160 MPa, respectively. Differential stress was therefore calculated to be ∼135 MPa. Magma density was assumed to be 2,800 kg/m3 based on estimates for Earth analogue lavas and lunar basalt melts (
3 Results
3.1 Earth Analogue Results
Model results approximate current estimates for dike propagation distances in the Columbia River Basalts. Mid-crustal estimates from
Trends in d values show a shallowing to the north (Figure 5). Propagation distances between 20 and 30 km were more commonly observed in the Steens and Monument dike swarms while values in the Chief Joseph dike swarm were closer to 7–10 km. Outside of the extent of the Columbia River Basalt Province, dike propagation depth variability increases with few trends in dike depth associated with direction.
FIGURE 5

This map shows the spatial relationships of the faults within the Yakima Fold Province (black lines), Columbia River Basalt Province (gray region;
3.2 Mercury Smooth Plains Results
Dike propagation distances for Mercury’s smooth plains were variable depending on the tensile strength for basalt used in the calculation. For intact basalt with a tensile strength of 14.9 MPa, d values ranged from 81.3 to 88.7 km. For heavily impacted basalt with a reduced tensile strength of 2 MPa, d values ranged from 10.8 to 10.9 km.
4 Discussion
4.1 Earth Analogue
The application of an Earth analogue to this research confirmed that theoretical and physical models of dike propagation could be applied to Mercury. Dike propagation distance estimates for the Columbia River Basalt Province suggest a lower to mid-crustal source for the basalts consistent with geophysical evidence (
Evidence that such a large volume of basalt erupted in a short period of time and in a setting with low rates of back arc extension supports a plume origin for the basalts. A plume hypothesis holds that as the North American craton moved southwest over a mantle plume, the head and tail of the plume separated. While the tail of the plume moved along the Snake River Plain hot spot track, the head of the plume promoted melting and formation of the flood basalts (
Other hypotheses for the flood basalt origins also align with the younging and shallowing northward pattern in the dikes.
Despite an overall northward propagation pattern, the dikes indicative of the deepest source are not located near the Steens flows. Instead, they are located farther north, in the southern region of the Chief Joseph dike swarm (red points, Northeastern Oregon, Figure 5). The high d values calculated for this region are located within the Wallowa Mountains. While some studies conclude that this particular area represents the location of a plume fed and crustally contaminated magma chamber (
Our results likely reflect these important spatial patterns due to the compositions of the basement rocks and the surface rocks which formed as a consequence of these processes. If the depths had been strictly divided based on basement rock, then we would expect to only see two general dike propagation distances. Instead, the variability to the north outside of the extent of the basalt province and the deep propagation depths near the Wallowa Mountains indicate that bedrock composition also plays a role in determining the dike patterns. Smaller d values are associated with sedimentary bedrock or andesite volcanic bedrock over gabbro basement rock, due to the smaller tensile strength of sedimentary rocks and large density difference between andesite and gabbro.
4.2 Mercury
Dike propagation depths for Mercury have consequences for understanding potential sources for the effusive deposits and the geologic history of the planet as a whole. When tied to compositional data, they allow us to speculate on the sources and causes of melting. Our upper bound estimates of ∼81–89 km likely correspond to some depth within Mercury’s upper mantle early in the planet’s history (Figure 6). Mantle melts would be expected to be higher in magnesium than is observed, at least in the northern plains deposits (
FIGURE 6

This conceptual diagram (not to scale) shows dikes and thrust faults propagating simultaneously in a horizontally compressive stress regime where propagation distances range between 10 and 89 km, and the lithosphere through which dike propagation occurs is mechanically layered.
These depths are also consistent with depths estimated by
Our work constrains this space by calculating a narrower range of deviatoric stresses through which the dikes propagated. Our source of variability arises largely from the host rock tensile strengths. We can however learn something about mechanical stratigraphy of the lithosphere as a consequence. The lower bounds for d values (∼10 km) are not consistent with a reasonable range proposed by
Global contraction is often cited as the reason that volcanism slowed (e.g.,
Viewing thrust faulting and volcanism as connected processes from a compressional stress perspective paves the way for future work studying the cessation of global contraction. Because global contraction would have peaked during the earlier periods- the time coincident with volcanism-we can assume that horizontal compressive stresses only decreased with time. Thus, by studying faults that represent a spectrum of ages postdating the smooth plains emplacement and estimating fault propagation depth, one could track the relative relaxation of stresses by calculating the deviatoric stresses associated with each fault population. It may also be possible to study pre-plains fault populations and calculate minimum deviatoric and horizontal compressive stresses for older thrusts and early periods of global contraction on Mercury.
The depths of older faults outside of the plains, but that propagated around the same time, also provide some insight into the character of diking at depth. Geometric models of faults ∼4.0 Ga place their lower tips near 30–40 km, with the elastic lithosphere extending to the same depths (
Because thrust fault-related landforms- and thrust faults by association-have been shown to have preferred orientations within Borealis Planitia (
The methodology described here could furthermore be used to differentiate magma sources for different plains units. The differential stress value used in the source depths calculation presented in this study was derived from the fault observations in Borealis Planitia. This unit has a distinct composition from other plains units (
5 Conclusion
Global contraction and effusive volcanism are often presented as conflicting processes. While there is no doubt that strong, horizontal compressive stresses do not encourage volcanism, these stresses also do not necessarily prevent magma from reaching the surface.
We examined the possibility of coincident dike (tensile crack) and thrust fault propagation. We applied frictional faulting theory and a window of possible stresses for tensile crack propagation produced from the Griffith Criterion and Kirsch equations to limit the estimations of maximum and minimum horizontal stresses. The frictional faulting theory equation for reverse faulting overlaps with the window of stresses capable of producing tensile cracks. This allows us to recognize that there must be a limited range of stress scenarios where diking and thrust faulting can be coincident. It is possible that dikes propagated vertically on Mercury while thrust faults were deforming the planet’s lithosphere.
We then applied our working knowledge of the depth of faulting on Earth and Mercury, to calculate a range for horizontal and vertical stresses during tectonic and volcanic activity on Mercury and at an Earth analogue site in the Columbia River Basalt Province. These stresses permitted the calculation of the deviatoric stress and the testing of an application of a physically derived equation for dike propagation depth at the Earth analogue site. Many studies had already proposed a narrow window of magma source depths for this site, and dikes had been well mapped and characterized.
Upon validation on a large scale of the model, we calculated dike propagation depths for Mercury’s smooth plains units. We conclude that 1) global contraction did not preclude effusive volcanism and 2) the dikes that produced the plains could have been sourced from ∼89 km depth. Importantly, this result explains a possible deep source for the massive expanses of volcanic plains that cover 40% of Mercury’s surface. Now that this method has been tested, it can be applied to further advance our understanding of global contraction, Mercury’s paleostress regimes, and melt sources within Mercury’s crust and upper mantle. In particular, the broad distribution of plains materials and thrust faulting may allow for a deeper understanding of the depths to melt sources across the planet.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
Crane conceived of the idea for the study and lead the student (AB) through the research process. AB lead the GIS analysis of dike data. Crane wrote the manuscript with significant help from AB.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Jeannette Luna and attendees at the MEXAG 2021 meeting for their feedback. We also acknowledge the minor contributions in early stages of preliminary work of an additional graduate student, Kevin Branigan. We thank the Department of Geosciences at Mississippi State University for funding the open access fee for this submission.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2021.752864/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AndersonE. M. (1905). The Dynamics of Faulting. Trans. Edinb. Geol. Soc.8, 387–402. 10.1144/transed.8.3.387
2
AndersonE. M. (1951). The Dynamics of Faulting and Dyke Formation with Applications to Brittan. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
3
BanksM. E.XiaoZ.WattersT. R.StromR. G.BradenS. E.ChapmanC. R.et al (2015). Duration of Activity on Lobate-Scarp Thrust Faults on Mercury. J. Geophys. Res. Planets120, 1751–1762. 10.1002/2015JE004828
4
BanksM. E.XiaoZ.BradenS. E.BarlowN. G.ChapmanC. R.FassettC. I.et al (2017). Revised Constraints on Absolute Age Limits for Mercury's Kuiperian and Mansurian Stratigraphic Systems. J. Geophys. Res. Planets122, 1010–1020. 10.1002/2016JE005254
5
BarryT. L.KelleyS. P.ReidelS. P.CampV. E.SelfS.JarboeN. A.et al (2013). Eruption Chronology of the Columbia River Basalt Group. Geol. S. Am. S.497, 45–66. 10.1130/2013.2497(2)
6
BenderA. M.AmosC. B.BiermanP.RoodD. H.StaischL.KelseyH.et al (2016). Differential Uplift and Incision of the Yakima River Terraces, central Washington State. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth121, 365–384. 10.1002/2015JB012303
7
BertelsenH. S.RogersB. D.GallandO.DumazerG.Abbana BenanniA. (2018). Laboratory Modeling of Coeval Brittle and Ductile Deformation during Magma Emplacement into Viscoelastic Rocks. Front. Earth Sci.6, 199. 10.3389/feart.2018.00199
8
ByerleeJ. D. (1968). Brittle-ductile Transition in Rocks. J. Geophys. Res.73, 4741–4750. 10.1029/JB073i014p04741
9
ByrneP. K.KlimczakC.Celâl ŞengörA. M.SolomonS. C.WattersT. R.HauckS. A. (2014). Mercury's Global Contraction Much Greater Than Earlier Estimates. Nat. Geosci.7, 301–307. 10.1038/ngeo2097
10
ByrneP. K.OstrachL. R.FassettC. I.ChapmanC. R.DeneviB. W.EvansA. J.et al (2016). Widespread Effusive Volcanism on Mercury Likely Ended by about 3.5 Ga. Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 7408–7416. 10.1002/2016GL069412
11
CampV. E.HananB. B. (2008). A Plume-Triggered Delamination Origin for the Columbia River Basalt Group. Geosphere4, 480–495. 10.1130/GES00175.1
12
CampV. E.RossM. E. (2004). Mantle Dynamics and Genesis of Mafic Magmatism in the Intermontane Pacific Northwest. J. Geophys. Res.109, 1–14. 10.1029/2003JB002838
13
CampV. E.ReidelS. P.RossM. E.WolffJ. A.MartinB. S.TolanT. L.et al (2013). Origin of Columbia River Basalt: Passive Rise of Shallow Mantle, or Active Upwelling of a Deep-Mantle Plume. Geol. S. Am. S.497, 181–199. 10.1130/2013.2497(07)
14
CampV. E.ReidelS. P.RossM. E.BrownR. J.SelfS. (2017). Field-trip Guide to the Vents, Dikes, Stratigraphy, and Structure of the Columbia River Basalt Group, Eastern Oregon and southeastern Washington. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, 1–88. No. 2017-5022-N. 10.3133/sir20175022N
15
CarlsonR. W.HartW. K. (1987). Crustal Genesis on the Oregon Plateau. J. Geophys. Res.92, 6191–6206. 10.1029/JB092iB07p06191
16
CasaleG.PrattT. L. (2015). Thin‐ or Thick‐Skinned Faulting in the Yakima Fold and Thrust Belt (WA)? Constraints from Kinematic Modeling of the Saddle Mountains Anticline. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.105, 745–752. 10.1785/0120140050
17
CatchingsR. D.SaltusR. W. (1994). Upper-crustal Structure beneath the Columbia River Basalt Group, Washington: Gravity Interpretation Controlled by Borehole and Seismic Studies: Discussion and Reply. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.106, 1096–1101. 10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106<1096:ucsbtc>2.3.co;2
18
CraneK. T.KlimczakC. (2017). Timing and Rate of Global Contraction on Mercury. Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 3082–3089. 10.1002/2017GL072711
19
CraneK. T.KlimczakC. (2019a). Tectonic Patterns of Shortening Landforms in Mercury's Northern Smooth plains. Icarus317, 66–80. 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.05.034
20
CraneK. T.KlimczakC. (2019b). A 3-D Structural Model of the Saddle Mountains, Yakima Fold Province, Washington, USA: Implications for Late Tertiary Tectonic Evolution of the Columbia River Flood Basalt Province. Tectonophysics766, 1–13. 10.1016/j.tecto.2019.05.015
21
CraneK. (2020). Structural Interpretation of Thrust Fault-Related Landforms on Mercury Using Earth Analogue Fault Models. Geomorphology369, 107366. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107366
22
DahmT. (2000). Numerical Simulations of the Propagation Path and the Arrest of Fluid-Filled Fractures in the Earth. Geophys. J. Int.141, 623–638. 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00102.x
23
DasT.NoletG. (1998). Crustal Thickness Map of the Western United States by Partitioned Waveform Inversion. J. Geophys. Res.103, 30021–30038. 10.1029/98JB01119
24
DavenportK. K.HoleJ. A.TikoffB.RussoR. M.HarderS. H. (2017). A strong Contrast in Crustal Architecture from Accreted Terranes to Craton, Constrained by Controlled-Source Seismic Data in Idaho and Eastern Oregon. Lithosphere9, 325–340. 10.1130/L553.1
25
DavisR. O.SelvaduraiA. P. S. (1996). Elasticity and Geomechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26
DelanoJ. W. (1990). Buoyancy-driven Melt Segregation in the Earth's Moon. I-Numerical Results. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. Proc.20, 3–12.
27
DeneviB. W.RobinsonM. S.SolomonS. C.MurchieS. L.BlewettD. T.DomingueD. L.et al (2009). The Evolution of Mercury's Crust: A Global Perspective from MESSENGER. Science324, 613–618. 10.1126/science.1172226
28
DeneviB. W.ErnstC. M.MeyerH. M.RobinsonM. S.MurchieS. L.WhittenJ. L.et al (2013). The Distribution and Origin of Smooth plains on Mercury. J. Geophys. Res. Planets118, 891–907. 10.1002/jgre.20075
29
Egea-GonzálezI.RuizJ.FernándezC.WilliamsJ.-P.MárquezÁ.LaraL. M. (2012). Depth of Faulting and Ancient Heat Flows in the Kuiper Region of Mercury from Lobate Scarp Topography. Planet. Space Sci.60, 193–198. 10.1016/j.pss.2011.08.003
30
ElliotD. H.FlemingT. H. (2018). “The Ferrar Large Igneous Province: Field and Geochemical Constraints on Supra-crustal (High-level) Emplacement of the Magmatic System,” in Large Igneous Provinces from Gondwana and Adjacent Regions. Editors SensarmaS.StoreyB. C. (London, United kingdom: Geologyical Society, London, Special Publications), 463, 41–58. 10.1144/SP463.1
31
FreedA. M.BlairD. M.WattersT. R.KlimczakC.ByrneP. K.SolomonS. C.et al (2012). On the Origin of Graben and Ridges within and Near Volcanically Buried Craters and Basins in Mercury's Northern plains. J. Geophys. Res.117, 1–15. 10.1029/2012JE004119
32
GalluzziV.FerrantiL.MassironiM.GiacominiL.GuzzettaL.PalumboP. (2019). Structural Analysis of the Victoria Quadrangle Fault Systems on Mercury: Timing, Geometries, Kinematics, and Relationship with the High‐Mg Region. J. Geophys. Res. Planets124, 2543–2562. 10.1029/2019JE005953
33
GreeleyR.FagentsS. A.HarrisR. S.KadelS. D.WilliamsD. A.GuestJ. E. (1998). Erosion by Flowing Lava: Field Evidence. J. Geophys. Res.103, 27325–27345. 10.1029/97JB03543
34
GretenerP. E. (1969). On the Mechanics of the Intrusion of Sills. Can. J. Earth Sci.6, 1415–1419. 10.1139/e69-143
35
HalesT. C.AbtD. L.HumphreysE. D.RoeringJ. J. (2005). A Lithospheric Instability Origin for Columbia River Flood Basalts and Wallowa Mountains Uplift in Northeast Oregon. Nature438, 842–845. 10.1038/nature04313
36
HartleyM.MaclennanJ. (2018). Magmatic Densities Control Erupted Volumes in Icelandic Volcanic Systems. Front. Earth Sci.6, 29. 10.3389/feart.2018.00029
37
HeadJ. W.ChapmanC. R.StromR. G.FassettC. I.DeneviB. W.BlewettD. T.et al (2011). Flood Volcanism in the Northern High Latitudes of Mercury Revealed by MESSENGER. Science333, 1853–1856. 10.1126/science.1211997
38
HoekE.MartinC. D. (2014). Fracture Initiation and Propagation in Intact Rock - A Review. J. Rock Mech. Geotechn. Eng.6 (4), 287–300. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.06.001
39
HoekE. (1965). Rock Fracture under Static Stress Conditions. South Africa: National Mechanical Engineering Research Institute Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
40
HooperA.ÓfeigssonB.SigmundssonF.LundB.EinarssonP.GeirssonH.et al (2011). Increased Capture of Magma in the Crust Promoted by Ice-Cap Retreat in Iceland. Nat. Geosci.4, 783–786. 10.1038/ngeo1269
41
JaegerJ. C.CookN. G. W.ZimmermanR. (2007). Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics. 4th Ed.Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
42
KavanaghJ. L.MenandT.SparksR. S. J. (2006). An Experimental Investigation of Sill Formation and Propagation in Layered Elastic media. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.245, 799–813. 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.03.025
43
KelseyH. M.LadinskyT. C.StaischL.SherrodB. L.BlakelyR. J.PrattT. L.et al (2017). The Story of a Yakima Fold and How it Informs Late Neogene and Quaternary Backarc Deformation in the Cascadia Subduction Zone, Manastash Anticline, Washington, USA. Tectonics36, 2085–2107. 10.1002/2017TC004558
44
KjøllH. J.GallandO.LabrousseL.AndersenT. B. (2019). Emplacement Mechanisms of a Dyke Swarm across the Brittle-Ductile Transition and the Geodynamic Implications for Magma-Rich Margins. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.518, 223–235. 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.016
45
KlimczakC.WattersT. R.ErnstC. M.FreedA. M.ByrneP. K.SolomonS. C.et al (2012). Deformation Associated with Ghost Craters and Basins in Volcanic Smooth plains on Mercury: Strain Analysis and Implications for plains Evolution. J. Geophys. Res.117, 1–15. 10.1029/2012JE004100
46
KlimczakC.ByrneP. K.ŞengörA. M. C.SolomonS. C. (2019). Principles of Structural Geology on Rocky Planets. Can. J. Earth Sci.56, 1437–1457. 10.1139/cjes-2019-0065
47
KlimczakC. (2015). Limits on the Brittle Strength of Planetary Lithospheres Undergoing Global Contraction. J. Geophys. Res. Planets120, 2135–2151. 10.1002/2015JE004851
48
KuhnD.DahmT. (2004). Simulation of Magma Ascent by Dykes in the Mantle beneath Mid-ocean Ridges. J. Geodynamics38, 147–159. 10.1016/j.jog.2004.06.002
49
KuhnD.DahmT. (2008). Numerical Modelling of Dyke Interaction and its Influence on Oceanic Crust Formation. Tectonophysics447, 53–65. 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.09.018
50
ListerJ. R. (1991). Steady Solutions for Feeder Dykes in a Density-Stratified Lithosphere. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.107, 233–242. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90073-Q
51
LiuL.StegmanD. R. (2012). Origin of Columbia River Flood basalt Controlled by Propagating Rupture of the Farallon Slab. Nature482, 386–389. 10.1038/nature10749
52
MaccaferriF.BonafedeM.RivaltaE. (2011). A Quantitative Study of the Mechanisms Governing dike Propagation, dike Arrest and Sill Formation. J. Volcanol. Geothermal Res.208, 39–50. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.09.001
53
MageeC.JacksonC. A.-L.HardmanJ. P.ReeveM. T. (2017). Decoding Sill Emplacement and Forced Fold Growth in the Exmouth Sub-basin, Offshore Northwest Australia: Implications for Hydrocarbon Exploration. Interpretation5 (3), SK11–SK22. 10.1190/INT-2016-0133.1
54
MageeC.ErnstR. E.MuirheadJ.PhillipsT.JacksonC. A.-L. (2019a). “Magma Transport Pathways in Large Igneous Provinces: Lessons from Combining Field Observations and Seismic Reflection Data,” in Dyke Swarms of the World: A Modern Perspective. Editors SrivastavaR.ErnstR.PengP. (Singapore: Springer), 45–85. 10.1007/978-981-13-1666-1_2
55
MageeC.MuirheadJ.SchofieldN.WalkerR. J.GallandO.HolfordS.et al (2019b). Structural Signatures of Igneous Sheet Intrusion Propagation. J. Struct. Geol.125, 148–154. 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.010
56
MarchiS.MottolaS.CremoneseG.MassironiM.MartellatoE. (2009). A New Chronology for the Moon and Mercury. Astronomical J.137, 4936–4948. 10.1088/0004-6256/137/6/4936
57
MenandT.DanielsK. A.BenghiatP. (2010). Dyke Propagation and Sill Formation in a Compressive Tectonic Environment. J. Geophys. Res.115 (B8), 1–12. 10.1029/2009JB006791
58
MorrissM. C.KarlstromL.NasholdsM. W. M.WolffJ. A. (2020). The Chief Joseph dike Swarm of the Columbia River Flood Basalts, and the Legacy Data Set of William H. Taubeneck. William H. Taubeneck. Geosphere.16, 1082–1106. 10.1130/GES02173.1
59
MuirheadJ. D.AiroldiG.WhiteJ. D. L.RowlandJ. V. (2014). Cracking the Lid: Sill-Fed Dikes Are the Likely Feeders of Flood basalt Eruptions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.406, 187–197. 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.036
60
NamurO.CharlierB. (2017). Silicate Mineralogy at the Surface of Mercury. Nat. Geosci10, 9–13. 10.1038/ngeo2860
61
OstrachL. R.RobinsonM. S.WhittenJ. L.FassettC. I.StromR. G.HeadJ. W.et al (2015). Extent, Age, and Resurfacing History of the Northern Smooth plains on Mercury from MESSENGER Observations. Icarus250, 602–622. 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.11.010
62
PetersonG. A.JohnsonC. L.ByrneP. K.PhillipsR. J. (2020). Fault Structure and Origin of Compressional Tectonic Features within the Smooth Plains on Mercury. J. Geophys. Res. Planets125, e2019E006183. 10.1029/2019JE006183
63
PlattnerA. M.JohnsonC. L. (2021). Mercury's Northern Rise Core‐Field Magnetic Anomaly. Geophys. Res. Lett.48, e2021GL094695. 10.1029/2021GL094695
64
PlesciaJ. B.GolombekM. P. (1986). Origin of Planetary Wrinkle Ridges Based on the Study of Terrestrial Analogs. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.97, 1289–1299. 10.1130/0016-7606(1986)97<1289:oopwrb>2.0.co;2
65
ReidelS. P.CampV. E.TolanT. L.KauffmanJ. D.GarwoodD. L. (2013a). Tectonic Evolution of the Columbia River Flood basalt Province. Geol. S. Am. S.497, 293–324. 10.1130/2013.2497(12)
66
ReidelS. P.CampV. E.TolanT. L.MartinB. S.RossM. E.WolffJ. A.et al (2013b). The Columbia River Flood basalt Province: Stratigraphy, Areal Extent, Volume, and Physical Volcanology. Geol. S. Am.497, 1–43. 10.1130/2013.2497(01)
67
ReidelS. P. (1984). The Saddle Mountains; the Evolution of an Anticline in the Yakima Fold belt. Am. J. Sci.284, 942–978. 10.2475/ajs.284.8.942
68
RivaltaE.TaisneB.BungerA. P.KatzR. F. (2015). A Review of Mechanical Models of dike Propagation: Schools of Thought, Results and Future Directions. Tectonophysics638, 1–42. 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.10.003
69
RomanA.JaupartC. (2014). The Impact of a Volcanic Edifice on Intrusive and Eruptive Activity. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.408, 1–8. 10.1016/j/epsl.2014.09.01610.1016/j.epsl.2014.09.016
70
RubinA. M. (1995). Propagation of Magma-Filled Cracks. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.23, 287–336. 10.1146/annurev.ea.23.050195.001443
71
SchultzR. A. (1993). Brittle Strength of Basaltic Rock Masses with Applications to Venus. J. Geophys. Res.98, 10883–10895. 10.1029/93JE00691
72
SchultzR. A. (2019). Geologic Fracture Mechanics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316996737
73
SolomonS. C. (1977). The Relationship between Crustal Tectonics and Internal Evolution in the Moon and Mercury. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors15, 135–145. 10.1016/0031-9201(77)90026-7
74
SolomonS. C. (1978). On Volcanism and thermal Tectonics on One-Plate Planets. Geophys. Res. Lett.5, 461–464. 10.1029/GL005i006p00461
75
SpudisP. D.GuestJ. E. (1988). “Stratigraphy and Geologic History of Mercury,” in Mercury. Editors VilasF.ChapmanC. R.MatthewsM. S. (Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona Press), 118–164.
76
StaischL.BlakelyR.KelseyH.StyronR.SherrodB. (2018). Crustal Structure and Quaternary Acceleration of Deformation Rates in central Washington Revealed by Stream Profile Inversion, Potential Field Geophysics, and Structural Geology of the Yakima Folds. Tectonics37, 1750–1770. 10.1029/2017TC004916
77
Stockstill-CahillK. R.McCoyT. J.NittlerL. R.WeiderS. Z.HauckS. A. (2012). Magnesium-rich Crustal Compositions on Mercury: Implications for Magmatism from Petrologic Modeling. J. Geophys. Res.117, 1–13. 10.1029/2012JE004140
78
StromR. G.TraskN. J.GuestJ. E. (1975). Tectonism and Volcanism on Mercury. J. Geophys. Res.80, 2478–2507. 10.1029/JB080i017p02478
79
TibaldiA.PasquarèF.TormeyD. (2010). “Volcanism in Reverse and Strike-Slip Fault Settings,” in New Frontiers in Integrated Solid Earth Sciences. Editors CloetinghS.NegendankJ. (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer Science and Business Media), 315–348. 10.1007/978-90-481-2737-5_9
80
Van NoortR.WolterbeekT.DruryM.KandianisM.SpiersC. (2017). The Force of Crystallization and Fracture Propagation during In-Situ Carbonation of Peridotite. Minerals7, 190. 10.3390/min7100190
81
WatanabeT.MasuyamaT.NagaokaK.TaharaT. (2002). Analog Experiments on Magma-Filled Cracks: Competition between External Stresses and Internal Pressure. Earth Planet. Sp54 (12), e1247–e1261. 10.1186/bf03352453
82
WattersT. R.NimmoF. (2010). “The Tectonics of Mercury,” in Planetary Tectonics. Editors WattersT. R.SchultzR. A. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 15–80.
83
WattersT. R.SchultzR. A.RobinsonM. S.CookA. C. (2002). The Mechanical and thermal Structure of Mercury's Early Lithosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett.29, 37–1374. 10.1029/2001GL014308
84
WattersT. R.SelvansM. M.BanksM. E.HauckS. A.BeckerK. J.RobinsonM. S. (2015). Distribution of Large‐scale Contractional Tectonic Landforms on Mercury: Implications for the Origin of Global Stresses. Geophys. Res. Lett.42, 3755–3763. 10.1002/2015GL063570
85
WattersT. R.DaudK.BanksM. E.SelvansM. M.ChapmanC. R.ErnstC. M. (2016). Recent Tectonic Activity on Mercury Revealed by Small Thrust Fault Scarps. Nat. Geosci.9, 743–747. 10.1038/ngeo2814
86
WattersT. R. (1992). System of Tectonic Features Common to Earth, Mars, and Venus. Geol20, 609–612. 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0609:sotfct>2.3.co;2
87
WeiderS. Z.NittlerL. R.StarrR. D.McCoyT. J.Stockstill-CahillK. R.ByrneP. K.et al (2012). Chemical Heterogeneity on Mercury's Surface Revealed by the MESSENGER X-Ray Spectrometer. J. Geophys. Res.117, 1–15. 10.1029/2012JE004153
88
WeiderS. Z.NittlerL. R.StarrR. D.Crapster-PregontE. J.PeplowskiP. N.DeneviB. W.et al (2015). Evidence for Geochemical Terranes on Mercury: Global Mapping of Major Elements with MESSENGER's X-Ray Spectrometer. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.416, 109–120. 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.023
89
WilsonL.HeadJ. W. (2008). Volcanism on Mercury: A New Model for the History of Magma Ascent and Eruption. Geophys. Res. Lett.35, L23205. 10.1029/2008GL035620
90
WolffJ. A.RamosF. C.HartG. L.PattersonJ. D.BrandonA. D. (2008). Columbia River Flood Basalts from a Centralized Crustal Magmatic System. Nat. Geosci.1, 177–180. 10.1038/ngeo124
91
ZobackM. D. (2010). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Summary
Keywords
Mercury, fault (fracture) section, structural geology, tectonics, dike, Earth analogs
Citation
Crane K and Bohanon A (2021) Dike Propagation During Global Contraction: Making Sense of Conflicting Stress Histories on Mercury. Front. Earth Sci. 9:752864. doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.752864
Received
03 August 2021
Accepted
30 November 2021
Published
23 December 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Matteo Massironi, University of Padua, Italy
Reviewed by
Valentina Galluzzi, Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology (INAF), Italy
Valerio Acocella, Roma Tre University, Italy
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Crane and Bohanon.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kelsey Crane, kelseycrane@geosci.msstate.edu
This article was submitted to Structural Geology and Tectonics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.