Abstract
The modern precipitation balance in southeastern (SE) Brazil is regulated by the South American summer Monsoon and threatened by global climate change. On glacial-interglacial timescales, monsoon intensity was strongly controlled by precession-forced changes in insolation. To date, relatively little is known about the spatiotemporal distribution of tropical precipitation in SE Brazil and the resulting variability of fluvial discharge on glacial-interglacial timescales. Here, we present X-ray diffraction-derived mineralogical data for the 150–70 ka period (marine isotope stage (MIS) 6 to MIS 5) from the Doce River basin. This area was sensitive to changes in monsoonal precipitation intensity due to its proximity to the South Atlantic Convergence Zone. The data, obtained from a marine sediment core (M125-55–7) close to the Doce river mouth (20°S), show pronounced changes in the Doce River suspension load’s mineralogical composition on glacial-interglacial and precessional timescales. While the ratio of silicates to carbonates displays precession-paced changes, the mineralogical composition of the carbonate-free fraction discriminates between two assemblages which strongly vary between glacial and interglacial time scales, with precession-forced variability only visible in MIS 5. The first assemblage, dominated by high contents of kaolinite and gibbsite, indicates intensified lowland erosion of mature tropical soils. The second one, characterized by higher contents of the well-ordered illite, quartz and albite, points to intensified erosion of immature soils in the upper Doce Basin. High kaolinite contents in the silicate fraction prevailed in late MIS 6 and indicate pronounced lowland soil erosion along a steepened topographic gradient. The illite-rich mineral assemblage was more abundant in MIS 5, particularly during times of high austral summer insolation, indicating strong monsoonal rainfall and intense physical erosion in the upper catchment. When the summer monsoon weakened in times of lower insolation, the mineral assemblage was dominated by kaolinite again, indicative of lower precipitation and runoff in the upper catchment and dominant lowland erosion.
Introduction
The Doce River watershed, situated in southeastern Brazil, is considered a region strongly sensitive to climate variability and especially vulnerable to the socio-economic and environmental impacts of climate change (). This region is expected to suffer from long-term droughts, flooding through heavy rainfalls, coastal erosion, which will lead to a decline in silviculture viability, reduced croplands, a loss of biodiversity, a decrease in hydroelectric generating capacity and accompanying risks to human health (). Dry winters and rainy summers in the region are caused by the South American Summer Monsoon (SASM) (; Figure 1). Future climate models indicate that this pattern will strengthen over eastern Brazil, leading to a further decrease in precipitation during the dry season (June, July and August) and an increase in precipitation during the rainy season (December, January and February) (; ). Models for different future climate scenarios display complex, at times contradictory, spatial patterns of summer precipitation increases and decreases for the Doce Basin (). While climate model projections are constantly improving, they are still subject to uncertainties, of which some are being narrowed down and others are irreducible (). Uncertainties regarding regional precipitation development make regional and seasonal paleoclimate data highly valuable for estimating future precipitation patterns (), which is particularly important for vulnerable regions like the Doce watershed.
FIGURE 1
Paleoclimate studies from the last glacial period and the Holocene indicate that solar irradiation and high latitude temperature changes affect South American monsoonal precipitation patterns by impacting atmospheric as well as ocean circulation and SST distribution in the tropical South Atlantic (e.g.,
To assess the complex paleoprecipitation patterns, regional paleoclimate records are needed. Here, we provide a record of the past spatiotemporal precipitation variability in the Doce Basin, based on changes in the mineral composition of the discharged sediment analyzed via X-ray diffraction (XRD). The Doce Basin encompasses both the SACZ domain as well as the (south)eastern coastal lowlands of Brazil and thus is ideally suited to track past spatial precipitation variability. We investigated an 80 kyr time interval from late Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 6 to the end of MIS 5, which spans over glacial, transitional and interglacial climate phases, covers a large range of CO2 conditions (185–290 ppm V (
Climate and Geological Setting
The Doce watershed covers an area of 86,715 km2. Fluvial discharge flows from elevations of over 1,500 m for roughly 850 km until reaching the Doce delta at around 19.7°S (
FIGURE 2

Geologic (A) and soil (B) map of the Doce river discharge area. White stippled lines mark the boundaries of discharge areas. Geology is compiled from the tectonic map inset of the geological map of Brazil, 1:1.000.000, sheets Belo Horizonte, Rio Doce, Rio de Janeiro and Vitoria (CPRM–Serviço Geológico do Brasil, 2004). Soil data are digital versions of the Mapa de Solos do Brasil 1:5.000.000 (
While the large amounts of tropical soils in the source region make this area particularly suitable for palaeoclimate reconstructions via clay mineral analyses (
Materials and Methods
The analyzed sediments are derived from piston gravity core M125-55–7, recovered during research cruise M125 with the German research vessel METEOR in March and April 2016. The core was taken at 20° 21.807′ S and 38° 37.387’ W, 165 km from the Brazilian coast, from a water depth of 1960 m (
The age model for this core was developed by
Sample Preparation
Approximately 2 ml (∼3 g) of each sample were dried, ground by hand and filled into sample holders from the rear side to gain texture-free bulk sediment samples. The rest of each sample was dissolved in 20% formic acid and rinsed with deionized water after decarbonization. The clay-sized fraction, < 2 μm, was separated through the Atterberg method (4 cm settling height) with sodium phosphate to avoid flocculation. After retrieving the clay-sized fraction, 0.1 ml of magnesium chloride solution was added to each sample suspension. Texture-free clay samples were created by inserting the clay powder from the rear side into the sample holder. The texture-free sample XRD measurement provides data for semi-quantitative mineral phase analysis. Textured clay samples were obtained by dissolving 20 mg of the clay powder in 2 ml deionized water, pipetting the suspension on circular glass slides and letting them dry at room temperature. Data from textured samples indicate the variability in clay mineral quantity more precisely and are used for the structural analysis of illites. After being exposed to an ethylene glycol atmosphere, the textured clay samples were remeasured to expand clay minerals such as smectites. This procedure makes the illite and smectite peaks more easily distinguishable from mixed layer mineral peaks (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3

Diffractogram showing the result of the four different preparation methods at one sample (Nr. 480). The y scale is to be viewed relatively within each measurement and does not indicate absolute values or relative intensities between different measurement types. (A) The bulk texture-free samples indicate the carbonate peaks, some halite, as well as quartz and low albite content. (B) Peaks from other phases, such as goethite and clay minerals are more distinctly seen in the texture-free measurements conducted on the decarbonized clay fraction. In curve B several high peaks at 20–21.5° 2Θ are reflections from kaolinites with b-axis variabilities (Kb). (C) Due to the sheet like crystal habit of clay minerals, their diffraction peaks are most intense, and thus best measurable, in the textured preparation. At around 7° 2Θ reflections from mixed layer minerals (ML) are detectable between the smectite and illite peak. (D) To minimize the possible interference of these mixed layer minerals with the illite and smectite peaks and to reliably identify the expandable smectite phase, the textured clay fraction samples are remeasured after exposure to an ethylene glycol (EG) atmosphere.
Optical Analysis
We analyzed the sieving residuals of sizes greater than 250 µm under a stereo microscope, identifying the main calcifying organisms and their superficially visible preservation state. Additionally, we prepared smear slides of the bulk sediment from equivalent core depths. The smear slides were analyzed under a Zeiss Axio Imager A2 Microscope at up to 1,250 times magnification, to evaluate the microscopic content of the samples.
X-Ray Diffractometry (XRD)
All samples were measured with a PANalytical X’Pert PRO diffractometer, equipped with a copper X-ray tube, a Ni-filter, an automatic divergence aperture, a sample spinner, a sample changer with a capacity of 15 samples and a X’Celerator detector. The measuring voltage was 40 kV and the electric current was 30 mA. Measurements were performed in steps below 0.01° 2Θ with 30–50 s per step.
Four types of XRD measurements were performed. Firstly, the whole sediment was analyzed in a texture-free manner in the bulk sediment analysis. Secondly, the clay fraction only was analyzed in a texture-free manner. Thirdly, the clay fraction was analyzed with orientated particles in the textured analysis. And lastly, the textured clay samples were remeasured after exposure to an ethylene glycol atmosphere (Figure 3). The XRD datasets are available in the Supplementary Material.
XRD Data Evaluation
The XRD data is visualized in a diffractogram displaying the measured reflexes in relative counts per second (cps) over the measurement angle 2Θ for each sample (see Figure 3). The changes in abundance of a mineral phase were evaluated by measuring the peak intensity (texture-free samples) or the peak area (textured samples). The software used for data evaluation is MacDiff 4.2.6 (
The values of the peak heights or areas of all measured phases were summed for each sample and defined as 100% of the sediment (e.g., for the bulk sediment in Figure 4I). The relative percentages of the phases are calculated thereafter. Aragonite, Mg-calcite and calcite are additionally evaluated separately as percentages of the sum of all carbonate phases from the bulk sediment.
FIGURE 4

Bulk sediment and river derived fraction XRD data compared to (A) the summer insolation curve at 20°S (Laskar et al., 2004), (B) ln (Ti/Ca) ratios based on x-ray fluorescence scanning of Core M125-55-7 (Hou et al., 2020a). (C) The carbonate to silicate ratio is calculated from the bulk sediment measurements and indicates the relative discharge of terrestrial material through runoff. During high insolation phases, discharge is enhanced. (D) The (060) peak around 1.50 Å (texture free clay fraction) indicates the proportion of different elements occupying the octahedra cation position in illite, with Fe2+ and Mg2+ indicating wider spacing and Al3+ lower spacing. Values above 1.505 Å are shaded. Al-rich illites are more abundant in phases of high discharge in MIS 5. (E) The width of the of the 10 Å illite peak at half of its maximum height is expressed as the half height width (HHW) within the textured clay fractions. Values below 0.3 Δ° 2Θ are shaded. Brought 10 Å peaks indicate higher degradation or lower crystallinity, occurring predominantly in high insolation phases. (F) δ18O values from the Botuverá Cave (cave location see Figure 1) from Cruz et al. (2005). (G) The Illite to kaolinite ratio is calculated from the textured clay fraction measurements. It represents the discharge proportion from the mountainous region, with immature, illite rich soils to the mature kaolinite rich soils of the lowlands and coastal areas where soils are particularly low in illite. Erosion in mountainous areas seems to be enhanced during interglacial high insolation phases. (H) Quartz, albite and illite are mainly derived from disintegrated parent rock grains within immature soils while kaolinite and gibbsite are newly built in mature soils. Their ratio is calculated from texture-free clay fraction measurements and indicates the proportion of parent rock to soil sourced discharge. (I) Proportion of all mineral phases determined from the bulk sediment measurements.
Results
The carbonate to silicate ratio indicates an insolation-paced relative increase in terrestrial material within the sediment (Figures 4A–C). The ratio of illite, quartz and albite to kaolinite and gibbsite within the bulk sediment was low during MIS six but increased during MIS 5 (Figure 4H). During MIS 6, illite to kaolinite is very low, while MIS 5 has a higher background illite to kaolinite ratio (Figure 4G). During MIS 5, the illite to kaolinite ratio increases and decreases in phase with insolation. Similarly, the mineral phases illite, quartz and albite are dominant in the bulk sediment during MIS 5 in times of high insolation, while kaolinite and gibbsite are relatively reduced. Furthermore, the illite to kaolinite ratio displays an asymmetric pattern with a gradual increase followed by a rather abrupt decline, as seen at 108 ka and 87 ka. A similar pattern is visible in the illite, albite and quartz to kaolinite and gibbsite ratio.
Further investigations on the half height width of the 10 Å illite peak of the textured clay fraction indicated that all illites are relatively well crystallized, with half height widths of below 0.4 Δ° 2Θ (Figure 4E). Using the illite polytype quantification approach after
Aragonite, present at 35–63%, is the most abundant within the carbonate phases. Aragonite suppliers present in the samples are pteropod shells and a few other gastropod and bivalve shells. The shells are well preserved and did not show superficially visible signs of dissolution. Mg-calcite, mainly supplied by echinoderms and some miliolid foraminifera, makes up 5–28% of the carbonates. Calcite is delivered by benthic and planktonic foraminifera as well as coccolithophores and accounts for 22–58% of the carbonate fraction. In times of lower insolation, aragonite and Mg-calcite are the dominant carbonate phases, while in times of higher insolation, aragonite and Mg-calcite contents decrease, and calcite is relatively more abundant. This variability is well observed in the aragonite plus Mg-calcite to calcite ratio (Figure 5E). The sharp peak at 126 ka is especially rich in aragonite and is followed by a peak in calcite at around 123 ka (Figure 4I). This pattern is repeated less intensely during later intervals of carbonate phase development, wherein aragonite and Mg-calcite peaks at 106 and 88 ka are followed by calcite increases at 100 and 82 ka, respectively.
FIGURE 5

Proportion of calcite phases compared to environmental proxies. (A) Sea level curve relative to today from Spratt and Lisiecki (2016). (B) Austral summer insolation curve at 20°S (Laskar et al., 2004). (C) Ice‐volume‐free seawater δ18O curve from Core M125-55–7 (Hou et al., 2020a). (D)Globigerinoides ruber (pink) Mg/Ca SST from Core M125-55–7 (Hou et al., 2020b). (E) Relation of the carbonate phases aragonite and Mg-calcite to calcite. The ratio is intensifying the carbonate trends seen in the bulk sediment record (Figure 4I), with aragonite and Mg-calcite being decreased and calcite being increased in high insolation phases. (F) The carbonate to silicate ratio indicates the discharge intensity of the Doce River. The remarkable co-variability of carbonate phase proportions and discharge indicates that the riverine influx impacts the marine environmental conditions. High discharge seemed to be more profitable for calcitic organisms while in times of higher evaporation, indicated by high temperatures and salinities, aragonitic and Mg-calcitic organisms dominate the carbonate production.
Discussion
Mineral Phase Origins
To determine the relationship between mineralogical changes in the sediments and precipitation changes in the hinterland, it is necessary to evaluate the main origins of the mineral phases. Possible mineral sources can be categorized into terrestrial sources and marine sources. Marine sources are mainly skeletal remains of marine organisms. Terrestrial sources are more diverse; they include terrestrial material delivered from distal sources via marine currents and material from the Doce watershed and adjacent regions. The majority of the Doce watershed area is covered by thick mature soils, mainly latosols and podzols (Figure 2). In these mature soils, weatherable parent rock minerals are dissolved, and kaolinite and gibbsite are built (WRB, 2015). The formation of illites within the soil could be a result of orthoclase weathering (
1. Marine built: The measured carbonate phases in the samples are aragonite, Mg-calcite and calcite. Noticeable terrestrial input is unlikely, as there are no significant amounts of limestone outcropping in the Doce watershed (Schobbenhaus et al., 1981). Moreover, the amount of visible clastic, non-biogenous carbonate grains in the samples was below 1%. The main mature soils present (ferralsol and acrisol) are acidic (WRB, 2015;
2. Distal sources: Smectite and chlorite are detectable in the clay samples. They are, however, not present in the clay fraction transported by the Doce River (
3. Immature soil derived: Illite polytype quantification after
4. Mature soil derived: Kaolinite is newly built during ferralsol formation (WRB, 2015), and ferralsols/latosols are the most abundant mature soils in the Doce Basin (
On the eastern and southeastern Brazilian coast, the Doce River is associated with the highest suspended sediment discharge into the Atlantic Ocean (
Within the Doce watershed, a regional distribution of different mineral sources allows for the discrimination between three areas: the mountainous regions with thin immature soils in the upper catchment as the source for most of the illite, quartz and albite; the mature, thick soil plains of the middle and lower catchment, being low in illite and rich in kaolinite; and the almost illite-free coastal lowland soils (
Carbonate Variability
Within the carbonate phases, a distinct insolation-related pattern is visible (Figure 5). Aragonite and Mg-calcite proportions are higher in times of low summer insolation and low fluvial discharge. In contrast, calcite is increased in times of high summer insolation and higher fluvial discharge. The rise of aragonite and Mg-calcite productivity in MIS five corresponds to some degree with elevated SST and salinity (δ18O ice-free seawater) data from the same core (
At the core site, the lowest water mass is the Upper North Atlantic Deep Water (UNADW), which is present from the ocean floor (1,960 m) to depths of roughly 1,100 m (
Since aragonite dissolution at the deposition site was probably low to moderate, the aragonite and Mg-calcite to calcite ratio likely reflects the relative productivity changes of the different calcifiers. Aragonite and Mg-calcite calcifiers could have been better adapted to elevated temperatures and salinities and less tolerant to increased nutrient levels and turbidity induced by high fluvial discharge. By contrast, calcitic organisms could have thrived in times of high summer insolation and higher fluvial discharge. The calcareous nannofossil assemblage from a nearby core (KF-12, taken at ∼21°S) consists of over 60% opportunistic coccolithophores (Emiliania huxlei and Gephyrocapsa spp.) (
Monsoon Driven Discharge Variability During MIS 5
The carbonate to silicate ratio can be driven by carbonate productivity, carbonate dissolution, and terrestrial input variability. In times of high fluvial nutrient influx, an increase in primary productivity and respiration is expected, which could lead to acidification of the water masses and carbonate dissolution (
The carbonate to silicate ratio indicates an increased overall fluvial discharge during intervals of high austral summer insolation and confirms the previously measured ln (Ti/Ca) (
The illite crystallinity, indicated by the half-height width of the 10 Å illite peak, refers to the amount of consecutively stacked illite crystal layers. Illite crystallinity is generally high in Core M125-55-7 sediments, indicating that illites are mostly crushed mica particles (
During the low austral summer insolation phases of MIS 5, discharge from the Doce River decreased as indicated by the carbonate to silicate ratio increase. High illite crystallinity also points to lower illite degradation in low insolation phases. Furthermore, there was a reduction in the proportion of parent rock derived fraction to soil-built fraction. A decrease in erosivity and weathering indicates reduced water availability, which we interpret as a weakening of the summer monsoon system during the low insolation phases of MIS 5. The low illite to kaolinite ratio supports our interpretation that, due to a weakened summer monsoon, erosion in the upper river course is reduced, making mature lowland soils the primary supplier for the fluvial sediment load. At the same time, SE trade winds and with them austral winter precipitation could have increased in MIS 5 low insolation phases similar to the situation in MIS 6 proposed by
The asymmetry of the illite to kaolinite curve indicates a slow increase in mountainous erosion, driven by a gradually intensifying monsoon, followed by a rapid decrease in the ratio of illite to kaolinite as monsoonal precipitation weakened. A similar pattern is visible in the ratio of parent rock derived minerals to soil-built minerals (Figure 3H). It is to be noted that a continuation of the heavy monsoon signal during already decreasing insolation takes place at the beginning of the cooler substages MIS 5d and MIS 5b. This could be an indicator of higher moisture availability in the Doce Basin during global cooling. The overall tendency of the system for a slow moisture increase followed by a rapid decrease in moisture availability, as shown in our data, highlights the region’s potential vulnerability to increasing droughts in a changing climate (
To assess the spatial variability in monsoonal rainfall intensity, we compared our data to a δ18O stalagmite record from the Botuverá Cave (
Lowland Discharge During Late MIS 6
Like during MIS 5, an increase in sediment discharge during phases of high summer insolation is visible during MIS 6. However, the dominance of parent rock derived material from immature soils over mature soil-built mineral phases during the high insolation period is missing. Also, the illite to kaolinite ratios, which showed a clear covariation with insolation in MIS 5, stay continuously low throughout MIS 6 and are well below the values from low insolation phases during MIS 5. This could be an indicator of stronger erosion in the illite-depleted present-day coastal areas and the widely exposed Brazilian shelf area during MIS 6 (
As the overall sediment discharge remained insolation dependent, it is likely that moisture availability was also increased in the Doce watershed during the high insolation phases of MIS 6. The lack of immature soil derived mineral phases during periods of high moisture availability indicates a difference in the distribution and short-term precipitation intensity between MIS 5 and MIS 6. Precipitation anomalies related to the modern SASM are more intense in the upper catchment of the Doce River (Figure 1). The sediment load discharged during December and January is roughly twice as much as the combined load during the rest of the year (
High Northern Latitude Temperatures and Local Precipitation
The difference in discharge composition between glacial (MIS 6) and interglacial (MIS 5) seen in our data agrees with previous studies indicating that the mainly insolation driven precipitation patterns over SE Brazil are affected by high northern latitude temperature changes and global pCO2 (
From our data, we can infer that the predominant rainfall regime in the Doce Basin shifted from well-developed lowland and coastal precipitation in MIS 6 to insolation-dependent heavy summer monsoon precipitation in the mountainous regions during MIS 5. Similarly, precipitation models propose that by 2080 global warming will have induced a slight increase in summer precipitation in the Doce watershed while winter precipitation will be decreased (
Conclusion
The availability in terrestrial sediment input from the Doce River to the marine sediment core M125-55-7 shows that insolation changes primarily paced fluvial discharge during the interval from 150 to 70 ka before present. Changes in the mineralogical composition of the discharge indicate that a strong summer monsoon system developed during the high austral summer insolation phases of the interglacial MIS 5, wherein heavy precipitation events increased erosion in the mountainous regions. During the low summer insolation phases of MIS 5, the monsoonal system was weakened, and lowland erosion became the main supplier of detrital fluvial discharge. During the glacial interval MIS 6, lowland and coastal erosion dominated the discharged sediment. A strong monsoonal precipitation pattern, increasing erosion in mountainous regions, was not developed. We propose that during MIS 5, the austral summer monsoon system strengthened and weakened in phase with insolation along a stationary SACZ. In contrast, the summer monsoon system throughout (late) MIS 6 was poorly developed, even in times of high insolation. Therefore, the impact of lowland precipitation on the riverine discharge was dominant throughout MIS 6. In this study, we interpret relative changes in riverine discharge. For a quantitative comparison with present and future climate scenarios, further research is needed. From the qualitative assessment of our paleoenvironmental data, we can infer that global warming may lead to more erosive SASM-related heavy precipitation events in summer and reduced mean annual precipitation in the lowland. This inference corresponds to recent climate models
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
IA: Conceptual model development, XRD data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and illustration. SV: Project design, supported manuscript writing, contributed illustration, cruise participation. RP: Supervision of sample preparation and XRD data analyses, exchange of scientific ideas, illustration refinement. AH: Exchange of scientific ideas, manuscript corrections. JR: Exchange of scientific ideas, manuscript corrections, cruise participation. AA: Cruise participation. AB: Exchange of scientific ideas, manuscript corrections, cruise chief scientist. All authors revised and approved the manuscript.
Funding
The METEOR expedition M125 was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). AB was supported by DFG grant BA3809/9, AA is a CNPq senior researcher (grant 302521/2017-8).
Acknowledgments
The authors kindly acknowledge the support by captain, crew members and the scientific party of R/V Meteor during the M125 expedition. We thank Jens O. Herrle for his support in the preparation of smear-slides and the identification of calcifying organisms and Lisa Preussner for helping with the clay sample preparation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.864381/full#supplementary-material
Data Sheet 1bulk sediment texture free XRD data
Data Sheet 2clay fraction texture free XRD data
Data Sheet 3clay fraction textured XRD data
Data Sheet 4mineralogical parameters of illite
References
1
Abreu Jr.C. H.Jr.MuraokaT.LavoranteA. F. (2003). Relationship between Acidity and Chemical Properties of Brazilian Soils. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.)60, 337–343. 10.1590/S0103-90162003000200019
2
AlmeidaF. F. M. d.Brito NevesB. B. d.Dal Ré CarneiroC. (2000). The Origin and Evolution of the South American Platform. Earth-Science Rev.50, 77–111. 10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00072-0
3
AlvaresC. A.StapeJ. L.SentelhasP. C.de Moraes GonçalvesJ. L.SparovekG.ArpG.et al (2013). Köppen's Climate Classification Map for BrazilPhotosynthesis-Induced Biofilm Calcification and Calcium Concentrations in Phanerozoic Oceans. metzScience22292, 7111701–7281704. 10.1126/science.105720410.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
4
BahrA.DoubrawaM.TitschackJ.AustermannG.NürnbergD.AlbuquerqueA. L.et al (2020). Monsoonal Forcing Controlled Cold Water Coral Growth off South-Eastern Brazil during the Past 160 Kyrs. Paleobiogeoscience Clim. Connect.10.5194/bg-2020-206
5
BahrA.Kaboth‐BahrS.JaeschkeA.ChiessiC.CruzF.CarvalhoL.et al (2021). Late Holocene Precipitation Fluctuations in South America Triggered by Variability of the North Atlantic Overturning Circulation. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol36, e2021PA004223. 10.1029/2021PA004223
6
BahrA.Spadano AlbuquerqueA. L.ArdenghiN.BatenburgS. J.BayerM.CatundaM. C.et al (2016). South American Hydrological Balance and Paleoceanography during the Late Pleistocene and Holocene (SAMBA)-Cruise No. M125, March 21-April 15, 2016 – Rio J. (Brazil)-Fortaleza Braz. (Bremen (Germany): METEOR-Berichte M125), 54, 34. 10.2312/cr_m125
7
BastosA. C.Amado-FilhoG. M.MouraR. L.SampaioF. M.BassiD.BragaJ. C. (2016). Origin and Sedimentary Evolution of Sinkholes (Buracas) in the Abrolhos Continental Shelf, Brazil. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.462, 101–111. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.09.009
8
BiscayeP. E. (1965). Mineralogy and Sedimentation of Recent Deep-Sea Clay in the Atlantic Ocean and Adjacent Seas and Oceans. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.76, 803–832. 10.1130/0016-7606(1965)76[803
9
BlissN. (2013). LBA-ECO LC-08 Soil, Vegetation, and Land Cover Maps for Brazil and South America. Data Set. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A. Available on-line (from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center Available at: http://daac.ornl.gov.
10
CarvalhoL. M. V. (2020). Assessing Precipitation Trends in the Americas with Historical Data: A Review. WIREs Clim. Change11, e627. 10.1002/wcc.627
11
CostaK. B.CabarcosE.SantarosaA. C. A.BattaglinB. B. F.ToledoF. A. L. (2016). A Multiproxy Approach to the Climate and Marine Productivity Variations along MIS 5 in SE Brazil: A Comparison between Major Components of Calcareous Nannofossil Assemblages and Geochemical Records. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.449, 275–288. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.02.032
12
CPRM – Serviço Geológico do Brasil (2004). Geological Map of Brazil 1:1.000.000 Scale: Geographic Information System-GIS. Brasília: CPRM.
13
CruzF. W.BurnsS. J.KarmannI.SharpW. D.VuilleM.CardosoA. O.et al (2005). Insolation-driven Changes in Atmospheric Circulation over the Past 116,000 Years in Subtropical Brazil. Nature434, 63–66. 10.1038/nature03365
14
CruzF. W.VuilleM.BurnsS. J.WangX.ChengH.WernerM.et al (2009). Orbitally Driven East-West Antiphasing of South American Precipitation. Nat. Geosci.2, 210–214. 10.1038/ngeo444
15
CunhaA. d. M.FontesM. P. F.LaniJ. L. (2019). Mineralogical and Chemical Attributes of Soils from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Domain. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.)76, 82–92. 10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0109
16
Embrapa-SNLCS (1981). Mapa des Solos do Brasil, 1:5.000.000. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Serviço National de Levantamento e Conservação de solos.
17
EsquevinJ. (1969). Influence de la composition chimique des illites sur leur cristallinité. Bull. Cent. Researches Pau-SNPA3, 147–153.
18
FAO-UNESCO (1971). Soil Map of the World, 1:5.000.000. Paris (France): South America.
19
FEAM (2011). Avaliação de impactos de mudanças climáticas sobre a economia mineira: relatório resumo.
20
FlantuaS. G. A.HooghiemstraH.VuilleM.BehlingH.CarsonJ. F.GoslingW. D.et al (2016). Climate Variability and Human Impact in South America during the Last 2000 years: Synthesis and Perspectives from Pollen Records. Clim. Past.12, 483–523. 10.5194/cp-12-483-2016
21
GerhardtS.HenrichR. (2001). Shell Preservation of Limacina Inflata (Pteropoda) in Surface Sediments from the Central and South Atlantic Ocean: A New Proxy to Determine the Aragonite Saturation State of Water Masses. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap.48, 2051–2071. 10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00005-X
22
GrathoffG. H.MooreD. M. (1996). Illite Polytype Quantification Using WILDFIRE Calculated X-Ray Diffraction Patterns. Clays Clay Minerals44, 835–842. 10.1346/CCMN.1996.0440615
23
GRDC (2020). Major River Basins of the World/Global Runoff Data Centre, GRDC. 2nd, Rev. Ext. Koblenz, Germany: Federal Institute of Hydrology BfG.
24
HenrichR.BaumannK.-H.GerhardtS.GrögerM.VolbersA. (2003). Carbonate Preservation in Deep and Intermediate Water Masses in the South Atlantic: Evaluation and Geological Record (A Review), 645, 670. 10.1007/978-3-642-18917-3_28
25
HouA.BahrA.RaddatzJ.VoigtS.GreuleM.AlbuquerqueA. L.et al (2020a). Insolation and Greenhouse Gas Forcing of the South American Monsoon System across Three Glacial‐Interglacial Cycles. Geophys. Res. Lett.47, e2020GL087948. 10.1029/2020GL087948
26
HouA.BahrA.SchmidtS.StreblC.AlbuquerqueA. L.ChiessiC. M.et al (2020b). Forcing of Western Tropical South Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature across Three Glacial-Interglacial Cycles. Glob. Planet. Change188, 103150. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103150
27
IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
28
JaeschkeA.RühlemannC.ArzH.HeilG.LohmannG. (2007). Coupling of Millennial-Scale Changes in Sea Surface Temperature and Precipitation off Northeastern Brazil with High-Latitude Climate Shifts during the Last Glacial Period. Paleoceanography22, a–n. 10.1029/2006PA001391
29
JahnkeR. A.CravenD. B.GaillardJ.-F. (1994). The Influence of Organic Matter Diagenesis on CaCO3 Dissolution at the Deep-Sea Floor. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta58, 2799–2809. 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90115-5
30
JonesC.CarvalhoL. M. V. (2002). Active and Break Phases in the South American Monsoon System. J. Clim.15, 905–914. 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0905:AABPIT>2.0
31
JonesG. A. (1984). Advective Transport of Clay Minerals in the Region of the Rio Grande Rise. Mar. Geol.58, 187–212. 10.1016/0025-3227(84)90123-3
32
KannerL. C.BurnsS. J.ChengH.EdwardsR. L. (2012). High-Latitude Forcing of the South American Summer Monsoon during the Last Glacial. Science335, 570–573. 10.1126/science.1213397
33
KnuttiR.SedláčekJ. (2013). Robustness and Uncertainties in the New CMIP5 Climate Model Projections. Nat. Clim. Change3, 369–373. 10.1038/nclimate1716
34
KodamaY. (1992). Large-Scale Common Features of Subtropical Precipitation Zones (The Baiu Frontal Zone, the SPCZ, and the SACZ) Part I: Characteristics of Subtropical Frontal Zones. J. Meteorological Soc. Jpn.70, 813–836. 10.2151/jmsj1965.70.4_813
35
KranzS. A.GladrowD. W.NehrkeG.LangerG.RostaB. (2010). Calcium Carbonate Precipitation Induced by the Growth of the Marine Cyanobacteria Trichodesmium. Limnol. Oceanogr.55, 2563–2569. 10.4319/lo.2010.55.6.2563
36
LaskarJ.RobutelP.JoutelF.GastineauM.CorreiaA. C. M.LevrardB. (2004). A Long-Term Numerical Solution for the Insolation Quantities of the Earth. A&A428, 261–285. 10.1051/0004-6361:20041335
37
LimaJ. E. F. W.LopesW. T. A.CarvalhoN. O.VieiraM. R.SilvaE. M. (2005). “Suspended Sediment Fluxes in the Large River Basins of Brazil,” in Sediment Budgets 1, Proceedings of the Foz Do Iguaçu Symposium, IAHS Scientific Assembly (Foz do Iguaçu (Brazil): IAHS Publ.), 355–363.
38
LisieckiL. E.RaymoM. E. (2005). A Pliocene-Pleistocene Stack of 57 Globally Distributed Benthic δ18O Records. Paleoceanography20, a–n. 10.1029/2004PA001071
39
MaiadaR. M. d. C. C.ReisdosA. T. d.AlvesdaE. d. C. C.SilvaC. G.GuerraJ. V.GoriniC.et al (2010). Architecture and stratigraphic framework of shelf sedimentary systems off Rio de Janeiro state, Northern Santos Basin-Brazil. Braz. J. Oceanogr.58, 15–29. 10.1590/S1679-87592010000500003
40
MayP.AlonsoL.BarbosaF.BritoM. C.LaureanoF.MarounC.et al (2020). Mainstreaming Climate Change in the Rio Doce Watershed Restoration. Available at: https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/49066 (Accessed November 22, 2021). 10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.06.en
41
MelfiA. J.CerriC. C.KronbergB. I.FyfeW. S.McKinnonB. (1983). Granitic Weathering: a Brazilian Study. J. Soil Sci.34, 841–851. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1983.tb01076.x
42
MeloV. F.SinghB.SchaeferC. E. G. R.NovaisR. F.FontesM. P. F. (2001). Chemical and Mineralogical Properties of Kaolinite-Rich Brazilian Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.65, 1324–1333. 10.2136/sssaj2001.6541324x
43
MeunierA.VeldeB. (2004). “The Geology of Illite,” in Illite: Origins, Evolution and Metamorphism. Editors MeunierA.VeldeB. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 63–143. 10.1007/978-3-662-07850-1_3
44
MohrE. C. J.Van BarenF. A.Van SchuylenborghJ. (1972). Tropical Soils – A Comprehensive Study of Their Genesis. 3rd ed.The Hague (Netherlands): Mouton - Ichtiar Baru - Van Hoeve.
45
OliveiraE. N. d.KnoppersB. A.LorenzzettiJ. A.MedeirosP. R. P.CarneiroM. E.SouzaW. F. L. d. (2012). A Satellite View of Riverine Turbidity Plumes on the NE-E Brazilian Coastal Zone. Braz. J. Oceanogr.60, 283–298. 10.1590/S1679-87592012000300002
46
OliveiraK. S. S.QuaresmaV. d. S. (2017). Temporal Variability in the Suspended Sediment Load and Streamflow of the Doce River. J. S. Am. Earth Sci.78, 101–115. 10.1016/j.jsames.2017.06.009
47
PetitJ. R.JouzelJ.RaynaudD.BarkovN. I.BarnolaJ.-M.BasileI.et al (1999). Climate and Atmospheric History of the Past 420,000 Years from the Vostok Ice Core, Antarctica. Nature399, 429–436. 10.1038/20859
48
PetróS. M.PivelM. A. G.CoimbraJ. C. (2021). Evidence of Supra-lysoclinal Dissolution of Pelagic Calcium Carbonate in the Late Quaternary in the Western South Atlantic. Mar. Micropaleontol.166, 102013. 10.1016/j.marmicro.2021.102013
49
PetschickR.KuhnG.GingeleF. (1996). Clay Mineral Distribution in Surface Sediments of the South Atlantic: Sources, Transport, and Relation to Oceanography. Mar. Geol.130, 203–229. 10.1016/0025-3227(95)00148-4
50
PetschickR. (2010). MacDiff 4.2.6 Manual. Available at: http://www.uni-frankfurt.de/69528130/Petschick___MacOS_Software.
51
RaddatzJ.TitschackJ.FrankN.FreiwaldA.ConfortiA.OsborneA.et al (2020). Solenosmilia Variabilis-Bearing Cold-Water Coral Mounds off Brazil. Coral Reefs39, 69–83. 10.1007/s00338-019-01882-w
52
RidingR. (2000). Microbial Carbonates: the Geological Record of Calcified Bacterial-Algal Mats and Biofilms. Sedimentology47, 179–214. 10.1046/j.1365-3091.2000.00003.x
53
RindD. (1998). Latitudinal Temperature Gradients and Climate Change. J. Geophys. Res.103, 5943–5971. 10.1029/97JD03649
54
SanchezP. A. (Editor) (2019). “Mineralogy,” Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 196–209. 10.1017/9781316809785.010
55
SantosE. O. de. J.GontijoI.SilvaM. B. da. (2014). Spatial Variability of Soil Acidity Attributes and Liming Requirement for Conilon Coffee. Coffee Sci.9, 275–283. Available at: http://www.sbicafe.ufv.br/handle/123456789/8052. (Accessed April 22, 2022).
56
SchlitzerR. (2021). Ocean Data View (ODV). Available at: https://odv.awi.de/(Accessed April 22, 2022).
57
SchobbenhausC.CamposD. de. A.DerzeG. R.AsmusH. E. (1981). Geologic Map of Brazil and Adjoining Ocean Floor Including Mineral Deposits, Scale 1: 1500 000. Brasilia: Departamento Nacional da Producao Mineral.
58
SeoK.-H.FriersonD. M. W.SonJ.-H. (2014). A Mechanism for Future Changes in Hadley Circulation Strength in CMIP5 Climate Change Simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett.41, 5251–5258. 10.1002/2014GL060868
59
SouzaW. F. L.KnoppersB. (2011). Fluxos de água e sedimentos a costa leste Do Brasil: relações entre a tipologia e as pressões antrópicas. Geochim. Bras.17, 57–74.
60
SprattR. M.LisieckiL. E. (2016). A Late Pleistocene Sea Level Stack. Clim. Past.12, 1079–1092. 10.5194/cp-12-1079-2016
61
StríkisN. M.ChiessiC. M.CruzF. W.VuilleM.ChengH.Souza BarretoE. A.et al (2015). Timing and Structure of Mega‐SACZ Events during Heinrich Stadial 1. Geophys. Res. Lett.42, 5477–5484A. 10.1002/2015GL064048
62
StríkisN. M.CruzF. W.BarretoE. A. S.NaughtonF.VuilleM.ChengH.et al (2018). South American Monsoon Response to Iceberg Discharge in the North Atlantic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 3788–3793. 10.1073/pnas.1717784115
63
Suárez-IbarraJ. Y.FrozzaC. F.PalhanoP. L.PetróS. M.WeinkaufM. F. G.PivelM. A. G. (2022). Calcium Carbonate Dissolution Triggered by High Productivity during the Last Glacial-Interglacial Interval in the Deep Western South Atlantic. Front. Earth Sci.10. 10.3389/feart.2022.830984
64
ThiryM. (2000). Palaeoclimatic Interpretation of Clay Minerals in Marine Deposits: an Outlook from the Continental Origin. Earth-Science Rev.49, 201–221. 10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00054-9
65
TierneyJ. E.PoulsenC. J.MontañezI. P.BhattacharyaT.FengR.FordH. L.et al (2020). Past Climates Inform Our Future. Science370. 10.1126/science.aay3701
66
TintelnotM. (1995). Transport and Deposition of Fine-Grained Sediments on the Brazilian Continental Shelf as Revealed by Clay Mineral Distribution.
67
TomasellaJ.Sene GonçalvesA.Schneider FalckA.Oliveira CaramR.Rodrigues DinizF. l.RodriguezD. a.et al (2019). Probabilistic Flood Forecasting in the Doce Basin in Brazil: Effects of the Basin Scale and Orientation and the Spatial Distribution of Rainfall. J. Flood Risk Manag.12, e12452. 10.1111/jfr3.12452
68
VeldeB. (Editor) (1995). Origin and Mineralogy of Clays: Clays and the Environment (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer). 10.1007/978-3-662-12648-6
69
VeldeB.MeunierA. (2008). “Fundamentals of Clay Mineral Crystal Structure and Physicochemical Properties,” in The Origin of Clay Minerals in Soils and Weathered Rocks. Editors VeldeB.MeunierA. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 3–73. 10.1007/978-3-540-75634-7_1
70
VuilleM.GarreaudR. D. (2011). “Ocean-atmosphere Interactions on Interannual to Decadal Timescales,” in Handbook of Environmental Change (Los Angeles, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications London), 471–496.
71
WarratzG.HenrichR.VoigtI.ChiessiC. M.KuhnG.LantzschH. (2017). Deglacial Changes in the Strength of Deep Southern Component Water and Sediment Supply at the Argentine Continental Margin. Paleoceanography32, 796–812. 10.1002/2016PA003079
72
WRB, IUSS Working Group (2015). World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. World Soil Resour. Rep. No. 106, 192.
Summary
Keywords
fluvial discharge, summer monsoon, Marine Isotope Stage 6 (MIS 6), Marine Isotope Stage 5 (MIS 5), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), southeastern Brazil, western tropical Atlantic
Citation
Arndt I, Voigt S, Petschick R, Hou A, Raddatz J, Albuquerque ALS and Bahr A (2022) Spatiotemporal Discharge Variability of the Doce River in SE Brazil During MIS 6 and 5. Front. Earth Sci. 10:864381. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.864381
Received
28 January 2022
Accepted
05 May 2022
Published
06 June 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Joyanto Routh, Linköping University, Sweden
Reviewed by
Sanjeev Kumar, Physical Research Laboratory, India
Sophia Hines, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Arndt, Voigt, Petschick, Hou, Raddatz, Albuquerque and Bahr.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Iris Arndt, iris.arndt@stud.uni-frankfurt.de
This article was submitted to Quaternary Science, Geomorphology and Paleoenvironment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.