Abstract
We present a high-resolution S wave velocity model of the Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO) and its adjacent areas derived from S wave traveltime residuals of teleseismic waveforms recorded by the dense ChinArray seismic network. Our model reveals S wave velocity anomalies beneath the study area, suggesting the strong lateral heterogeneities of the upper mantle structures. The upper mantle of the Datong volcano is dominated by the significant low velocity anomalies. In addition to the low-velocity zone rooted in the mantle transition zone beneath the Datong volcano region, two low velocity layers extend northwestward to the Hetao graben and southwestward to the southern TNCO within depths of 100–300 km, respectively. Based on these low-velocity anomalies, we provide new insights into the origin of the Datong volcano, which may be related to the asthenospheric upwelling originated from the water-rich mantle transition zone and horizontal mantle flows driven by the extrusion northeastward of the Tibetan plateau. A clear velocity contrast in the upper mantle above 300 km depth beneath the Ordos block and the TNCO implies that the Ordos block still preserves thick cratonic root while the lithosphere of the TNCO is modified. We propose that the asthenospheric upwelling and northeastward push of the Tibetan plateau account for the lithospheric deformation of the TNCO and its adjacent areas.
Introduction
The Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO) is an important part of the North China Craton (NCC), formed by the collision between the eastern NCC and western NCC in the Late Paleoproterozoic (Zhao et al., 2001). The TNCO mainly consists of the Taihang mountain, Lüliang mountain and a series of extensional grabens in-between, such as the Weihe graben and Fenhe graben (Figure 1). In contrast to the stable Ordos block with the thick and refractory Archean continental nucleus (Zhao et al., 2001), the TNCO has experienced intense tectonic deformation and magmatic activities since the Mesozoic, accompanied by the strong earthquakes (). As the largest Quaternary intraplate volcanic group in the NCC (Xu et al., 2005; ), the Datong volcano is located in the northern TNCO (Figure 1). According to the surface topography, lithospheric thickness (Zhang et al., 2019) and gravity anomalies (), the TNCO is considered as a transition zone between the eastern NCC undergone the dramatic rejuvenation and the western NCC remaining stable cratonic lithosphere. Therefore, the TNCO and its adjacent areas are ideal places to study the lithospheric deformation and tectonic evolution.
FIGURE 1
Geochemical and geological studies have suggested that the lithospheric thinning and transformation occurred in the NCC (Xu et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2011;
Seismic tomography is a powerful tool to image the Earth’s interior structure. In the past 2 decades, a number of seismic tomography inversions have been performed to construct the 3-D velocity models, focusing on the crustal and upper mantel structures of the TNCO and its adjacent areas (e.g., Zhao, 2004;
In this paper, we plan to investigate the lithospheric deformation by obtaining the high-resolution 3-D S wave velocity model of the crustal and upper mantle beneath the TNCO and its adjacent areas. At present, a large amount of the high-quality seismic waveforms has been accumulated from the dense seismic array deployed in the TNCO and its adjacent areas (Figure 1), which has the highest spatial resolution compared to that used in the previous studies. By picking up the teleseismic S wave traveltime residuals, we perform the seismic tomography inversion to determine the 3-D S wave velocity model of the TNCO and its adjacent areas. Our tomographic results can provide new insights into the mechanism of the lithospheric deformation and improve the understanding on the tectonic evolution of the TNCO and its adjacent areas.
Data and Methods
To measure S wave traveltime residuals, we collected the teleseismic waveforms recorded by 464 portable seismic stations from ChinArray phase III deployment (Figure 1). The ChinArray project has operated since August 2011 (
All earthquake events were selected by the magnitude greater than Ms 5.0 and epicentral distance range of 30°–85°. Then, we rotated the two horizontal components into the radial (R) and transverse (T) directions after removing the means, trends and instrument responses of all seismograms. The waveform correlation method (
FIGURE 2

Locations of 280 earthquakes used in this study. The color filed circles show the epicenters. The size of the circles represents the earthquake magnitude and the color indicates event depth. Note that although some events are located inside the 30° circle, all the seismograms we used have an epicentral distance between 30° and 85°.
We used the teleseismic tomographic method proposed by Zhao et al. (1994) to perform the 3-D inversion by using the relative S wave traveltime residuals beneath the TNCO and its adjacent areas. The ray paths and traveltimes were calculated accurately by an efficient ray tracing technique (Zhao et al., 1992). The LSQR algorithm (
Robustness Analysis
The quality and quantity of relative S wave traveltime residuals determine the reliability of tomographic results. To improve the accuracy of picking up the S wave arrival time, the method of P wave particle motions with teleseismic waveforms at period band of 5–50 s (
For a tomographic inversion, synthetic checkerboard test is usually used to assess the resolution of the inversion results. In this study, we applied the same ray paths as the final tomographic inversion using the real data but different grid size in parameterization of the initial model to perform our checkerboard test with the input velocity perturbation of ±3%. The random noises with a variance of 0.1 s were also added to the synthetic traveltime residuals for simulating the data picking errors. After checking the testing results, we found that the velocity anomalies were well reconstructed at different depths when the horizontal grid spacing was set to 0.5°×0.5° in the synthetic test (Figure 3). Therefore, our actual results are robust for the optimal grid spacing of 0.5°×0.5°. In addition, the damping factor is an important parameter to balance the smoothness of the final velocity model and the reduction of the root-mean-square (RMS) traveltime residual. To select a proper damping factor, we conducted many tomographic inversion tests using different values of the damping factor to evaluate the corresponding model smoothness and RMS traveltime residual. Supplementary Figure S7 displays the trade-off curves between the model smoothness and RMS traveltime residual. The optimal damping factor of 35 was chosen for the final tomographic inversion, which can almost minimize simultaneously the model smoothness and RMS traveltime residual (Supplementary Figure S7).
FIGURE 3

The checkerboard resolution test for the S wave velocity inversion (A–F) The recovered results at depths of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 600 km.
Restoring resolution test is another procedure to further verify the reliability of our tomographic results. According to the distribution of S wave velocity anomalies shown in Figure 4, we constructed a synthetic model (Supplementary Figure S8A) consisting of the high velocity anomaly beneath the Ordos block and inverted L-shaped low velocity anomaly beneath its surrounding rift grabens on the north and east, respectively. We set the perturbation of −3% and 3% with respect to the low and high velocity anomalies within the depth of 0−200 km. Then, the same ray paths and parameters of the initial model as the real data were adopted to estimate the traveltime residuals of the synthetic model. Supplementary Figure S8B shows the results of our restoring resolution test. Although the recovered amplitudes decrease slightly in some regions, the input high and low velocity anomalies are well restored. This means that our tomographic inversion is able to resolve the anomalies beneath the Ordos block and its surrounding regions.
FIGURE 4

Horizontal slices (A–F) of S wave velocity from the seismic tomographic inversion. The depth of each layer is shown in top left corner of each figure. The abbreviations are the same as those defined in the caption of Figure 1. The black lines labeled AA′, BB′ and CC′ in figure (B) represent the locations of the vertical sections shown in Figure 5.
Results
We construct a high-resolution 3-D S wave velocity model of the crustal and upper mantle beneath the TNCO and its adjacent areas from tomographic inversion using the teleseismic relative traveltime residuals. Our obtained velocity model can resolve well the scale of velocity anomaly of about 0.5°. Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the six horizontal slices at depths of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 600 km and three vertical sections of AA′, BB′ and CC’, respectively. The distribution of S wave velocity presents the significant lateral and vertical variations, indicating the strong structure heterogeneity beneath the study area. In the following sections, we only focus on the upper mantle structures and its implications. The crustal structures are ignored due to the lack of the traveltime data derived from the local and regional earthquakes for the tomographic inversion in this study.
FIGURE 5

Vertical sections (A–C) of S wave velocity along the profiles shown in Figure 4B. The surface topography of each section is plotted on the top of each figure. The black thick arrows suggest the possible asthenospheric upwelling and mantle flows. The dashed lines indicate the 410 and 660 km discontinuities. The abbreviations are the same as those defined in the caption of Figure 1.
In the horizontal slices of Figure 4, the distribution of S wave velocity structure exhibits the quite different patterns between 50–200 km and 300–600 km depths. In particular, the similar characteristics of the velocity structures are shown above 200 km depth although the shapes and amplitudes of the velocity anomalies are slightly different (Figures 4A–C). The velocity anomalies are unevenly distributed at depths of 300–600 km (Figures 4D–F), which suggests the obvious lateral heterogeneity. We find that the rigid Ordos block is dominated by the prominent high velocity anomalies within 50–200 km depth (Figures 4A–C). However, these high velocity anomalies are not completely correlated with the surface tectonic boundary of the Ordos block, accompanied by the low velocity intrusion occurred at the block edge. The significant low velocity anomalies exist under the north and east of the Ordos block above 200 km depth (Figures 4A–C), connecting at the Datong volcano region, which suggests the approximate inverted L-shape of the low velocity anomalies. The inverted L-shaped low velocity anomalies are nearly parallel to the strikes of the grabens and orogenic belts, such as the Hetao graben, Fenhe graben, Yin mountain and Taihang mountain. The northern TNCO is characterized by the obvious low velocity anomalies in Figures 4A–C, while the elongated low velocity anomalies with a NE-SW trend can be found in the southern TNCO. Especially, the Lüliang mountain is dominated by an alternate distribution of low and high velocity anomalies shown in Figures 4A–C. The central Asia orogenic belt is revealed by a complex structure based on our S wave velocity model at depths of 50–600 km.
The vertical sections of AA′ and BB′ are almost perpendicular at the Datong volcano (Figures 5A,B), with the strikes of NWW-SEE and NNE-SSW shown in Figure 4B, respectively. These two vertical sections are characterized by the prominent low S wave velocity anomaly under the Datong volcano. We find that the prominent low velocity anomaly can be traced down to the mantle transition zone. Besides, two remarkable low velocity layers can be found in the vertical sections of AA′ and BB′ within the depth of about 100–300 km (Figures 5A,B), which converge from northwest and southwest below the Datong volcano. The vertical section of CC’ crosses the Ordos block and TNCO, and then ends eastward at the western Bohai bay basin (Figure 4B). In Figure 5C, the obvious high S wave velocity anomaly exists under the Ordos block above the depth of 200 km, while the low velocity anomaly down to about 400 km is located beneath the Taihang mountain and the western Bohai bay basin. This distinct contrast of S wave velocity reflects the difference of the upper mantle structure. In our results, it is absent that the high velocity anomalies were explained by
Discussion
Comparisons With Previous Studies
Recently, many velocity models have been constructed by the different tomographic inversions to investigate the structures of the NCC (
Our tomographic model illustrates the similar structure patterns revealed by the previous models (
Origin of the Datong Volcano
The Datong volcano is one of the most important Quaternary volcanic groups in the NCC, consisting of more than 30 volcanic cones and lava platforms (
Many recent studies have reached a consensus on the hypothesis of the on-going asthenospheric upwelling under the Datong volcano (
In our high-resolution S wave velocity model (Figure 4 and Figure 5), the complex distribution of the low S wave velocity anomalies is shown under the Datong volcano region. Specifically, the low velocity layers within about 100–300 km depths from northwest (Figure 5B) and southwest (Figure 5A) connect the vertical low velocity zone rooted in the mantle transition zone beneath the Datong volcano. The NE-SW trending low velocity layer can be observed from the Datong volcano to the southern TNCO, which is roughly consistent with the mantle flow shown in the previous magnetotelluric (
In addition, we observe the vertical low velocity zone down into the mantle transition zone under the Datong volcano (Figures 5A,B), which can be also found in the previous models (
Implications for Lithospheric Thinning of the Trans-North China Orogen and Its Adjacent Areas
Since the Mesozoic, the NCC has experienced significant tectonic rejuvenation, accompanied by the widespread magmatism and intense extension (Zhu et al., 2011;
In fact, recent tomographic images have illustrated that the mantle lithosphere has been modified partially under the TNCO and its adjacent areas (Xu et al., 2018b; Yao et al., 2020;
According to our obtained high-resolution S wave velocity model, the thinned lithosphere is shown under the TNCO and its adjacent areas (Figure 4 and Figure 5). By analyzing comprehensively our observed S wave velocity anomalies and previous results, we can infer the possible dynamic processes for the lithospheric thinning of the TNCO and its adjacent areas. The two mantle flows driven by the extrusion northeastward of the Tibetan plateau, mentioned in previous section, is likely to erode the thick cratonic lithospheric root beneath the margin of the Ordos block and cause the modifications of the overlying lithosphere. This lithospheric deformation suggests that the effect of the continental collision between the Indian plate and Eurasian plate has far reached northeastward the TNCO region. Besides, the asthenospheric upwelling originated from the water-rich mantle transition zone is also responsible for the lithospheric thinning of the northern TNCO. In general, the asthenospheric upwelling and mantle flows maybe result in the lithospheric thinning under the TNCO and its adjacent areas, and then cause the superficial crustal deformation in response, such as the extensional grabens, strong earthquakes and volcanic activities.
Conclusion
A high-resolution 3-D S wave velocity model of the TNCO and its adjacent areas is built by seismic tomography inversion using the teleseismic traveltime residual data recorded by the dense seismic array. Our model shows a prominent lateral heterogeneity of the upper mantle structure across the study area. The Ordos block is featured by significant high velocity anomaly in depths of 0–300 km. We interpret this high velocity anomaly as the preserved thick cratonic root. Two low velocity layers, forming an inverted L-shape, appear in the north and east of the Ordos block. These two low velocity layers are likely to be related to the mantle flows driven by the extrusion northeastward of the Tibetan plateau. We find that the two low velocity anomalies intrude locally into the interior of the Ordos block, which implies the modification of the cratonic root around the outer edge of the Ordos block. An obvious low velocity zone can be found down into the mantle transition zone under the Datong volcano. We infer that this low velocity zone is caused by the hot asthenospheric upwelling originated from the water-rich mantle transition zone. This upward low velocity zone is connected to the two horizontal low velocity layers beneath the Datong volcano. We infer that the asthenospheric upwelling and mantle flows could be responsible for the origin of the Datong volcano and lithospheric thinning beneath the TNCO and its adjacent areas.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
XX collected the waveform data, plotted the figures used in this study and wrote the manuscript. ZD provided the raw data and guided this work. HG picked up the traveltime residuals and performed the tomography inversion. XL provided useful suggestions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 41974100) and the Special Fund of the Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration (Grant Nos DQJB16A03, DQJB17A01).
Acknowledgments
Waveform data for this study are provided by China Seismic Array Data Management Centre at Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration (doi: 10.12001/ChinArray.Data). All figures are plotted by Generic Mapping Tools (http://gmt.soest.hawaii.edu/home).
Conflict of interest
The reviewer ZG declared a shared affiliation with the authors XX, ZD, HG to the handling editor at the time of review.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.948040/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AiS.ZhengY.RiazM. S.SongM.ZengS.XieZ. (2019). Seismic Evidence on Different Rifting Mechanisms in Southern and Northern Segments of the Fenhe‐Weihe Rift Zone. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth124 (1), 609–630. 10.1029/2018jb016476
2
BercoviciD.KaratoS.-i. (2003). Whole-mantle Convection and the Transition-Zone Water Filter. Nature425, 39–44. 10.1038/nature01918
3
CaiY.WuJ.RietbrockA.WangW.FangL.YiS.et al (2021). S Wave Velocity Structure of the Crust and Upper Mantle Beneath Shanxi Rift, Central North China Craton and its Tectonic Implications. Tectonics40 (4), e2020TC006239. 10.1029/2020tc006239
4
ChangL.DingZ.WangC. (2021). Upper Mantle Anisotropy and Implications beneath the Central and Western North China and the NE Margin of Tibetan Plateau. Chin. J. Geophys. (in Chinese)64 (1), 114–130. 10.6038/cjg2021O0315
5
ChenL. (2010). Concordant Structural Variations from the Surface to the Base of the Upper Mantle in the North China Craton and its Tectonic Implications. Lithos120 (1-2), 96–115. 10.1016/j.lithos.2009.12.007
6
ChinArray-Himalaya (2011). China Seismic Array Waveform Data of Himalaya Project. Beijing: Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration. 10.12001/ChinArray.Data
7
ClarkM. K.RoydenL. H. (2000). Topographic Ooze: Building the Eastern Margin of Tibet by Lower Crustal Flow. Geology28 (8), 703–706. 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)028<0703:tobtem>2.3.co;2
8
ClarkM. K. (2012). Continental Collision Slowing Due to Viscous Mantle Lithosphere rather Than Topography. Nature483, 74–77. 10.1038/nature10848
9
DengY.FanW.ZhangZ.LiangK. (2014). The Gravity and Isostatic Moho in North China Craton and Their Implications to Seismicity. Earthq. Sci.27 (2), 197–207. 10.1007/s11589-013-0019-y
10
DongH.WeiW.YeG.JinS.JonesA. G.JingJ.et al (2014). Three-dimensional Electrical Structure of the Crust and Upper Mantle in Ordos Block and Adjacent Area: Evidence of Regional Lithospheric Modification. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.15 (6), 2414–2425. 10.1002/2014gc005270
11
DongX.YangD.NiuF.LiuS.TongP. (2021). Adjoint Traveltime Tomography Unravels a Scenario of Horizontal Mantle Flow beneath the North China Craton. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 12523. 10.1038/s41598-021-92048-8
12
EnglandP.HousemanG. (1986). Finite Strain Calculations of Continental Deformation: 2. Comparison with the India-Asia Collision Zone. J. Geophys. Res.91 (B3), 3664–3676. 10.1029/JB091iB03p03664
13
FanQ.ZhaoY.ChenS.LiN.SuiJ. (2015). Quaternary Volcanic Activities in the West of the Daxing'anling-Taihangshan Gravity Lineament. Bulletin of Mineral. Petrol. Geochem.34, 674–681. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2015.04.001
14
GaoX.GuoB.ChenJ.LiuQ.LiS.LiY. (2018). Rebuilding of the Lithosphere beneath the Western Margin of Ordos: Evidence from Multiscale Seismic Tomography. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese)61 (7), 2736–2749. 10.6038/cjg2018L0319
15
GuoZ.AfonsoJ. C.QashqaiM. T.YangY.ChenY. J. (2016). Thermochemical Structure of the North China Craton from Multi-Observable Probabilistic Inversion: Extent and Causes of Cratonic Lithosphere Modification. Gondwana Res.37, 252–265. 10.1016/j.gr.2016.07.002
16
HuangJ.ZhaoD. (2006). High-resolution Mantle Tomography of China and Surrounding Regions. J. Geophys. Res.111 (B9), B09305. 10.1029/2005jb004066
17
HuangX.DingZ.NingJ.NiuF.LiG.WangX.et al (2021). Sedimentary and Crustal Velocity Structure of Trans-North China Orogen from Joint Inversion of Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity and Ellipticity and Some Implication for Syn-Rift Volcanism. Tectonophysics819, 229104. 10.1016/j.tecto.2021.229104
18
KennettB. L. N.EngdahlE. R. (1991). Traveltimes for Global Earthquake Location and Phase Identification. Geophys. J. Int.105, 429–465. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06724.x
19
KreemerC.BlewittG.KleinE. C. (2014). A Geodetic Plate Motion and Global Strain Rate Model. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.15, 3849–3889. 10.1002/2014GC005407
20
LeiJ. (2012). Upper-mantle Tomography and Dynamics beneath the North China Craton. J. Geophys. Res.117 (B6), B06313. 10.1029/2012jb009212
21
LiY.GaoM.WuQ. (2014). Crustal Thickness Map of the Chinese Mainland from Teleseismic Receiver Functions. Tectonophysics611, 51–60. 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.11.019
22
LitasovK. D.OhtaniE.SanoA.SuzukiA. (2005). Wet Subduction versus Cold Subduction. Geophys. Res. Lett.32, L13312. 10.1029/2005gl022921
23
LiuM.WangH. (2012). Roaming Earthquakes in China Highlight Midcontinental Hazards. Eos Trans. AGU93 (45), 453–454. 10.1029/2012eo450001
24
LiuM.CuiX.LiuF. (2004). Cenozoic Rifting and Volcanism in Eastern China: a Mantle Dynamic Link to the Indo-Asian Collision?Tectonophysics393 (1-4), 29–42. 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.07.029
25
LiuX.ZhaoD.LiS.WeiW. (2017). Age of the Subducting Pacific Slab beneath East Asia and its Geodynamic Implications. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.464, 166–174. 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.02.024
26
MeyerB.TapponnierP.BourjotL.MétivierF.GaudemerY.PeltzerG.et al (1998). Crustal Thickening in Gansu-Qinghai, Lithospheric Mantle Subduction, and Oblique, Strike-Slip Controlled Growth of the Tibet Plateau. Geophys. J. Int.135, 1–47. 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00567.x
27
MolnarP.TapponnierP. (1975). Cenozoic Tectonics of Asia: Effects of a Continental Collision: Features of Recent Continental Tectonics in Asia Can Be Interpreted as Results of the India-Eurasia Collision. Science189 (4201), 419–426. 10.1126/science.189.4201.419
28
NiuF.LiJ. (2011). Component Azimuths of the CEArray Stations Estimated from P-Wave Particle Motion. Earthq. Sci.24 (1), 3–13. 10.1007/s11589-011-0764-8
29
PaigeC. C.SaundersM. A. (1982). LSQR: an Algorithm for Sparse Linear Equations and Sparse Least Squares. ACM Trans. Math. Softw.8 (1), 43–71. 10.1145/355984.355989
30
PearsonD. G.BrenkerF. E.NestolaF.McNeillJ.NasdalaL.HutchisonM. T.et al (2014). Hydrous Mantle Transition Zone Indicated by Ringwoodite Included within Diamond. Nature507 (7491), 221–224. 10.1038/nature13080
31
RawlinsonN.KennettB. L. N. (2004). Rapid Estimation of Relative and Absolute Delay Times across a Network by Adaptive Stacking. Geophys. J. Int.157 (1), 332–340. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02188.x
32
RoydenL. H.BurchfielB. C.van der HilstR. D. (2008). The Geological Evolution of the Tibetan Plateau. Science321, 1054–1058. 10.1126/science.1155371
33
SuetsuguD.InoueT.ObayashiM.YamadaA.ShiobaraH.SugiokaH.et al (2010). Depths of the 410-km and 660-km Discontinuities in and Around the Stagnant Slab beneath the Philippine Sea: Is Water Stored in the Stagnant Slab?Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.183 (1-2), 270–279. 10.1016/j.pepi.2010.09.004
34
TangY.ChenY. J.ZhouS.NingJ.DingZ. (2013). Lithosphere Structure and Thickness beneath the North China Craton from Joint Inversion of Ambient Noise and Surface Wave Tomography. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth118 (5), 2333–2346. 10.1002/jgrb.50191
35
TangY.YingJ.ZhaoY.XuX. (2021). Nature and Secular Evolution of the Lithospheric Mantle beneath the North China Craton. Sci. China Earth Sci.64 (9), 1492–1503. 10.1007/s11430-020-9737-4
36
TaoK.GrandS. P.NiuF. (2018). Seismic Structure of the Upper Mantle Beneath Eastern Asia from Full Waveform Seismic Tomography. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.19 (8), 2732–2763. 10.1029/2018gc007460
37
TapponnierP.ZhiqinX.RogerF.MeyerB.ArnaudN.WittlingerG.et al (2001). Oblique Stepwise Rise and Growth of the Tibet Plateau. Science294, 1671–1677. 10.1126/science.105978
38
TianY.ZhaoD.SunR.TengJ. (2009). Seismic Imaging of the Crust and Upper Mantle beneath the North China Craton. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.172 (3-4), 169–182. 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.09.002
39
TianX.BaiZ.KlempererS. L.LiangX.LiuZ.WangX.et al (2021). Crustal-scale Wedge Tectonics at the Narrow Boundary between the Tibetan Plateau and Ordos Block. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.554, 116700. 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116700
40
WangM.ShenZ. K. (2020). Present‐Day Crustal Deformation of Continental China Derived from GPS and its Tectonic Implications. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth125, e2019JB018774. 10.1029/2019jb018774
41
WangK.ZhaoL.XuX.YangJ. (2018). Heterogeneous Destruction of the North China Craton: Coupled Constraints from Seismology and Geodynamic Numerical Modeling. Sci. China Earth Sci.61 (5), 515–526. 10.1007/s11430-017-9142-1
42
WuF.-Y.YangJ.-H.XuY.-G.WildeS. A.WalkerR. J. (2019). Destruction of the North China Craton in the Mesozoic. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.47 (1), 173–195. 10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060342
43
XuY.-G.MaJ.-L.FreyF. A.FeigensonM. D.LiuJ.-F. (2005). Role of Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Interaction in the Genesis of Quaternary Alkali and Tholeiitic Basalts from Datong, Western North China Craton. Chem. Geol.224 (4), 247–271. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.08.004
44
XuX.NiuF.DingZ.ChenQ. (2018a). Complicated Crustal Deformation beneath the NE Margin of the Tibetan Plateau and its Adjacent Areas Revealed by Multi-Station Receiver-Function Gathering. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.497, 204–216. 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.06.010
45
XuX.ZhaoL.WangK.YangJ. (2018b). Indication from Finite-Frequency Tomography beneath the North China Craton: The Heterogeneity of Craton Destruction. Sci. China Earth Sci.61 (9), 1238–1260. 10.1007/s11430-017-9201-y
46
XuX.DingZ.LiL.NiuF. (2021). Crustal Anisotropy Beneath the Trans-North China Orogen and its Adjacent Areas from Receiver Functions. Front. Earth Sci.9, 753612. 10.3389/feart.2021.753612
47
YaoZ.EricS.WangC.DingZ.ChenY. (2020). Asthenospheric Upwelling beneath Northeastern Margin of Ordos Block: Constraints from Rayleigh Surface-Wave Tomography. Tectonophysics790, 228548. 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228548
48
YeZ.GaoR.LiQ.ZhangH.ShenX.LiuX.et al (2015). Seismic Evidence for the North China Plate Underthrusting beneath Northeastern Tibet and its Implications for Plateau Growth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.426, 109–117. 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.06.024
49
YuY.ChenY. J. (2016). Seismic Anisotropy beneath the Southern Ordos Block and the Qinling-Dabie Orogen, China: Eastward Tibetan Asthenospheric Flow Around the Southern Ordos. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.455, 1–6. 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.026
50
ZhangH.HuangQ.ZhaoG.GuoZ.ChenY. J. (2016). Three-Dimensional Conductivity Model of Crust and Uppermost Mantle at the Northern Trans North China Orogen: Evidence for a Mantle Source of Datong Volcanoes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.453, 182–192. 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.025
51
ZhangY.ChenL.AiY.JiangM. (2019). Lithospheric Structure beneath the Central and Western North China Craton and Adjacent Regions from S-Receiver Function Imaging. Geophys. J. Inter.219 (1), 619–632. 10.1093/gji/ggz322
52
ZhaoD.HasegawaA.HoriuchiS. (1992). Tomographic Imaging ofPandSwave Velocity Structure beneath Northeastern Japan. J. Geophys. Res.97 (B13), 19909–19928. 10.1029/92jb00603
53
ZhaoD.HasegawaA.KanamoriH. (1994). Deep Structure of Japan Subduction Zone as Derived from Local, Regional, and Teleseismic Events. J. Geophys. Res.99 (B11), 22313–22329. 10.1029/94jb01149
54
ZhaoG.WildeS. A.CawoodP. A.SuM. (2001). Archean Blocks and Their Boundaries in the North China Craton: Lithological, Geochemical, Structural and P–T Path Constraints and Tectonic Evolution. Precambrian Res.107 (1-2), 45–73. 10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00154-6
55
ZhaoD. (2004). Global Tomographic Images of Mantle Plumes and Subducting Slabs: Insight into Deep Earth Dynamics. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.146 (1-2), 3–34. 10.1016/j.pepi.2003.07.032
56
ZhuR.ChenL.WuF.LiuJ. (2011). Timing, Scale and Mechanism of the Destruction of the North China Craton. Sci. China Earth Sci.54 (6), 789–797. 10.1007/s11430-011-4203-4
57
ZhuY.LiuS.ZhangB.GurnisM.MaP. (2021). Reconstruction of the Cenozoic Deformation of the Bohai Bay Basin, North China. Basin Res.33 (1), 364–381. 10.1111/bre.12470
58
ZuoJ.WangL.NiuF. (2020). Multiple Source Downwellings beneath Eastern North China Revealed by 3-D CCP Migration of Receiver Function Data. J. Asian Earth Sci.192, 104266. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2020.104266
Summary
Keywords
trans-north China orogen, datong volcano, seismic tomography, S wave velocity, upper mantle structure
Citation
Xu X, Ding Z, Guo H and Li X (2022) Seismic Tomography of the Trans-North China Orogen and Its Dynamic Implications. Front. Earth Sci. 10:948040. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.948040
Received
19 May 2022
Accepted
16 June 2022
Published
07 July 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Weijia Sun, Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CAS), China
Reviewed by
Dongliang Liu, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), China
Zhi Guo, China Earthquake Administration, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Xu, Ding, Guo and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaoming Xu, xuxiaoming@cea-igp.ac.cn
This article was submitted to Solid Earth Geophysics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.