Abstract
Investigations of the hot spring water and gas in the volcanic region are involved in assessing geothermal resources and understanding groundwater circulation, volcano, and earthquake activities. The origins of water and gas of the hot springs, lakes, rivers, and rain in the Arxan volcanic region (AVR), northeastern (NE) China, were investigated by conducting a field survey and geochemical analysis. The low electrical conductivity (40–835 μS/cm) and low total dissolved solids (TDS, 23.83–540.00 mg/L) of the water samples indicate that they are fresh water. δ18O and δD values of the water samples range from −4.1% to −16.0% and from −61.3% to −119.9%, respectively. Enrichment of heavy isotopes in the rainwater and the crater lake waters was caused by evaporation. The component H2O of the water samples predominantly originated from the meteoric water, with less than 1 vol% contributed by deep-earth fluids. Ions in the rain sample were predominantly derived from sea salt and continental aerosol. Ions in the surface water samples had multiple origins (mineral dissolution, atmospheric, and anthropogenic sources). While the ions in the hot spring water were predominantly derived from both the dissolution of rocks and deep-earth fluids, the latter contributed 73%–87% of Cl− and 86%–99% of Na+ to the hot spring waters. Gases from the hot springs were composed of more than 95% N2 and less than 5% O2 and Ar, with 3He/4He ratios of 0.14–1.17 RA (RA=1.4×10−6). Excess N2, Ar, He, and CO2 of the hot springs were mainly derived from both the crust and upper mantle. About 3%–23% of the total He in the bubbling gases from the crater lake waters and hot springs is derived from the mantle, implying a supplement of heat energy from the mantle to the geothermal systems. Significantly, about 12% of the He dissolved in the Budonghe water is derived from the mantle, indicating that plenty of mantle-derived heat transported by deep-earth fluids keeps the river water from freezing. Our results indicate that Cl and Na ions and 3He/4He ratio are the feasible geochemical indicators for source partitioning of geothermal fluids.
1 Introduction
The origins of geothermal fluids in the volcanic areas are involved in investigations of natural resources, environment, and hydrological cycle. Ion concentrations and isotope ratios of groundwater are the efficient indicators of water origin, circulation process of groundwater, geothermal potential, and volcanic activity (; ; Taran, 2009, 2011; ; Tardani et al., 2016; ). Therefore, geochemical observations of fluids can reveal the fluid origins, magmatic and seismic processes, and dynamic processes in the deep earth.
It is a major challenge in geoscience to decipher the complexity of fluids and minerals in the earth’s interior. Sources of dissolved solids in groundwater can be divided into three categories: dissolution of minerals in circulation, deep-earth fluids, and atmospheric and anthropogenic sources. The deep-earth fluids, meaning waters, gases, and supercritical fluids that are derived from the deep crust and mantle, may be composited with different genetic types of fluids such as initial, magmatic, metamorphic, deep hydrothermal, and diagenetic fluids that usually mix into geothermal fluids. The origins of ions and gases can be traced by using concentrations and isotopic ratios of the chemical species and techniques of statistical analysis (; ; ). A variable non-sea-salt contribution usually causes the slope to differ from the seawater ratio and the intercept to differ from zero (). Cl− and Na+ are the most reliable indicators for discriminating and partitioning sources of ions in the spring waters because they tend to exist in aqueous solution during water circulation, while other ions are partially fixed in secondary minerals.
Ion concentrations, δ18O and δD, of water have been widely used for investigating the origins of geothermal fluids. For instance, the high values of δ18O, δD, δ13C, and Cl− concentrations of spring waters in Oita Plain, Japan, implied an origin of andesitic-magmatic steam or metamorphic water, while the low values of δD and Li and B concentrations of groundwater indicated meteoric water (). investigated the water vapor sources of meteoric water in NE China using δ18O and δD data. The hydrochemical data indicated that the main stream water of the Kherlen River in eastern Mongolia, neighboring to the west of the Arxan volcanic region (AVR), were recharged by meteoric water from the headwater region of more than 1,650 m altitude (Tsujimura et al., 2007). δ18O and δD values of the lake, river, and well waters in the Lake Hulun Basin neighboring to the north of the AVR indicated that the waters originated from meteoric water and suffered evident evaporation ().
The concentrations of gaseous components, He/Ne, 4He/20Ne, N2/Ar, 3He/4He, CO2/3He, and δ13C, provide insight on the sources of the gaseous species in the geothermal and volcanic systems (; ; ; Taran, 2009; 2011; Xu et al., 2013; ; ; Bini et al., 2022), secondary processes of geothermal fluids (Zhang et al., 2016; ), volcanic and seismic activities (; Zhou et al., 2015; Tardani et al., 2016), and contribution of volcanic gas to environment (Sun et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2021). The regional variations in 3He/4He, δ13C of CO2, δ15N, and 87Sr/86Sr values of hydrothermal fluids along an intra-arc fault system in the southern Volcanic Zone of the Chilean Andes indicated the geothermal gas was a mixture of mantle-derived gas and radiogenic gas in the crust (Tardani et al., 2016). The molecular and isotopic data of hot spring fluids and fumarolic gases in the Tateyama volcanic hydrothermal system in Japan (), the Tengchong volcanic area () and western Sichuan Province () in southwestern China, and the Wudalianchi volcanic field (; Xu et al., 2013), Changbaishan volcano (CBV) (Wei et al., 2016), and the Songliao continental rift system (Zhao et al., 2019) in NE China indicated the gases were predominantly derived from the mantle and crustal sources.
The mantle worldwide and regionally appears heterogeneous. The crust and upper mantle in NE China are characterized by fluctuation of Moho depth, mantle uplift in the rift valley and geophysical and geochemical heterogeneities (). The crust thickness in the Greater Khingan Range orogenic belt ranges from 34.5 to 43.5 km, while it becomes 32.4–36.2 km in the Songliao Basin in the east (; ). The statistic histogram of 279 3He/4He ratios of mantle xenoliths in eastern China shows multiple peaks with a wider range from 0.1 to 12 RA (excluding eight individual data from 12.1 to 33 RA; RA is atmospheric 3He/4He =1.4×10−6) (). Isotopic ratios of noble gases in mantle xenoliths in the orogenic belt and rift valley indicate that the mantle in NE China is heterogeneous. Obviously, the geochemical characteristics of the mantle in NE China differ from those in the middle ocean ridge and volcanic arc (; ; ).
The previous investigations in AVR mainly involved geology, volcanology, geothermics and hydrology (Tang, 1984; Sun, 1999; Zhang, 2017; ; ). The hydrogeochemical investigations for 36 hot springs (defined as their temperatures being 5°C higher than the local annual atmospheric temperature) around the Hot Spring Museum, a natural museum established for tourism and spa in the Arxan city, suggested that the hot spring waters were chemically classified into Ca·Na-HCO3·SO4, Na·Ca-HCO3, and Na-HCO3 (; Zhang, 2017), and the residence time of high-temperature hot spring waters ranges from 70 a to 90 a, and that of low-temperature hot springs/shallow groundwater is about 10 a (). Recently, the groundwater in the basalts of Arxan was considered exogenous water from the Tibetan Plateau based on the data of the water balance relationship and δ18O and δD values (). Zhao et al. (2021) reported that gases from two hot springs in the AVR were mainly composed of N2 with low 3He/4He ratios (c. 0.1 RA), high 4He/20Ne ratios (150–380), and δ13C values of CO2 (-6.2% to -13.6%). They concluded that the spring gases were mainly derived from the crust. So far, the origins of hot spring fluids in the AVR remain debated. This paper aims at revealing the contribution of deep-earth fluids to the geothermal system in the AVR based on the molecular and ion concentrations and isotope compositions of the hot spring fluids.
2 Geological and hydrothermal setting
The AVR is famous for a lot of hot springs and Quaternary volcanoes. It is located at the west margin of northeastern (NE) China, where volcanic eruptions were very violent in the Cenozoic Era and produced more than 590 volcanoes and about 50,000 km2 of exposed basalt (). The altitudes in the AVR range from 900 m to 1,700 m (Figure 1A). The annual mean temperature is −2.5°C, monthly averages of temperature range from 10.5°C to −31.2°C with the lowest temperature of -45.7°C recorded on 1st January 2001. Annual precipitation was 450 mm during 1951–2015, of which 80%–90% fell during June–September, whereas annual evaporation capacity is up to 1,116 mm (; ).
FIGURE 1
The AVR tectonically belongs to the Greater Khingan Range orogenic belt that connects with the northern part of the continental rift valley on the east. There are mainly five groups of faults in the study area: NEE, NNE, NW, NNW, and EW trending faults. The NEE-trending Halaha River fault cuts the lithosphere with a length of ca. 500 km. The deep-cut faults provide two channels for Quaternary magma migration from the mantle: one displays a high temperature and fluid-enriched body approaching the depth of 10–12 km, and another has become cold above a depth of 30 km (Tang et al., 2005). The series of NNW-trending basement rifts deeply cut the crust, favoring the deep cycle of groundwater and the formation of hot springs.
Mesozoic igneous rocks are widely distributed in the AVR with a small area of Paleozoic clastic strata (Figure 1C). The Paleozoic strata are composed of Late Ordovician metamorphic clastic rocks and volcanic-sedimentary clastic rocks, Late Silurian metamorphic clastic rocks, and Early–Middle Devonian clastic rocks sandwiched with biogenic limestone. The Mesozoic strata are mainly Late Jurassic rhyolitic lava and volcanic clastic rocks. The Cenozoic strata are Neogene clastic rocks and black basalts and Quaternary sediments (
Magmatic rocks in the study area are mainly the Early Indosinian and the Late-Middle Yanshanian porphyroid potassic granite, monzonitic granite, and moyite and Neogene and Quaternary basalts (Figures 1C, D). Alkaline basalts in the Greater Khingan Range are characterized by high MgO and Ni concentrations, high CaO/Al2O3 ratios, enrichment of large lithophile elements and positive Nb-Ta anomalies, and moderately depleted Sr–Nb–Hf isotopic ratios. The basalts could be derived from the deep primary mantle, possibly from ancient primordial peridotite (
Groundwaters in the study area can be classified into three types: (1) pore water in Quaternary fluvial sediments, discharging through river beds; (2) bedrock fissure water in Late Jurassic volcanic rocks, recharged by meteoric water and discharged through underflow to the river valley; and (3) vein-type fissure water in the fault zones (
The heat flow in the Greater Khingan Range is 40.2 mW/m2. The estimated Moho heat flow is 33.2 mW/m2 (Sun, 1999). Though the regional heat flow is low, three geothermal fields have been found in the AVR (
3 Sample and method
The water and gas samples were collected from the AVR in August 2010 (Figure 1). The field measurements of water temperature, electrical conductivity (EC), and pH were conducted with the portable instruments. The samples for hydrochemical analysis were collected with the 250-ml plastic bottles, and for stable isotopic analysis of H and O with the 2-ml plastic bottles. The gas samples were collected by the gas drainage method in 1,000-ml glass bottles and sealed with rubber caps (
Concentrations of Li+, Na+, NH4+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, F−, Cl−, NO3−, and SO42- were measured with a Dionex ICS-900 ion chromatography system with the standard configuration (reproducibility within ±2%). The HCO3− concentrations were measured by the standard titration procedures with a ZDJ-100 potentiometric titrator (reproducibility within ±2%) (
TABLE 1
| ID | Location | Type | T (°C) | EC (μS/cm) | PH | Li+ | Na+ | NH4+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | F− | Cl− | NO3− | SO42- | HCO3− | TDS | i.b % | δ18O | δD | Water type | Na* | Cl* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/L | ‰V-SMOW | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| AW-0 | VO | Rain | 20.0 | 41.3 | 7.74 | 0.01 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 5.9 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 19.8 | 26.9 | −0.32 | −8.5 | −94.4 | Ca-HCO3 | 98 | 85 |
| AW-1 | Dichi | Lake | 19.2 | 95.8 | 7.66 | 7.9 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 10.2 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 6.9 | 56.2 | 61.4 | −0.32 | −13.1 | −103.5 | Na-HCO3 | |||
| AW-2 | TFL Tianchi | Lake | 18.6 | 40.0 | 7.31 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 28.1 | 27.2 | −0.34 | −5.1 | −61.3 | Na·Ca-HCO3 | |||
| AW-3 | Dujuanhu | Lake | 19.8 | 51.4 | 7.29 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 7.4 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 5.8 | 28.1 | 39.2 | −0.33 | −10.9 | −87.6 | Ca·Mg-HCO3 | |||
| AW-4 | Tianchi | Lake | 21.8 | 40.3 | 6.92 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 22.1 | 23.8 | −0.30 | −4.1 | −61.4 | Ca·Mg-HCO3 | |||
| AW-5 | Budonghe | River | 7.5 | 90.8 | 7.68 | 0.01 | 6.2 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 11.2 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 7.2 | 58.3 | 59.2 | −0.32 | −13.4 | −106.2 | Ca·Mg-HCO3 | ||
| AW-6 | JJG | HS | 37.5 | 614.0 | 7.59 | 0.04 | 120.6 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 20.4 | 14.6 | 20.6 | 0.0 | 151.3 | 152.7 | 411.3 | −0.48 | −15.1 | −111.7 | Na-HCO3 | ||
| AW-7 | JJG | Well | 19.9 | 577.0 | 7.58 | 0.04 | 121.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 22.4 | 9.8 | 18.1 | 0.1 | 137.9 | 152.7 | 394.0 | −0.44 | −15.0 | −111.4 | Na-HCO3 | 98 | 83 |
| AW-8 | JJG | HS | 27.4 | 471.0 | 7.79 | 0.03 | 81.7 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 30.4 | 6.3 | 12.8 | 1.8 | 101.4 | 158.7 | 323.9 | −0.42 | −14.6 | −111.1 | Na-HCO3 | 96 | 76 |
| AW-9 | Wuliquan | HS | 3.5 | 391.0 | 7.76 | 0.02 | 53.6 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 5.9 | 38.7 | 1.8 | 22.1 | 30.5 | 39.2 | 156.7 | 275.9 | −0.32 | −16.0 | −118.4 | Na-HCO3 | 94 | 86 |
| AW-10 | HSM no. 34 | HS | 36.4 | 644.0 | 8.18 | 0.07 | 169.6 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 12.0 | 10.5 | 16.1 | 8.4 | 69.4 | 321.4 | 458.0 | −0.41 | −16.0 | −116.8 | Na-HCO3 | 98 | 81 |
| AW-11 | HSM no. 35 | HS | 25.1 | 691.0 | 7.77 | 0.05 | 155.0 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 25.1 | 7.6 | 17.2 | 20.3 | 69.0 | 372.5 | 491.7 | −0.43 | −15.8 | −115.0 | Na-HCO3 | 98 | 83 |
| AW-12 | HSM no. 36 | HS | 24.3 | 761.0 | 8.05 | 0.06 | 182.1 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 17.2 | 8.7 | 19.5 | 20.8 | 82.7 | 398.5 | 540.0 | −0.46 | −15.3 | −113.8 | Na-HCO3 | 98 | 85 |
| AW-13 | HSM no. 45 | HS | 23.9 | 835.0 | 7.97 | 0.08 | 219.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 15.0 | 11.0 | 23.6 | 26.8 | 114.7 | 385.5 | 612.3 | −0.45 | −15.6 | −114.4 | Na-HCO3 | 99 | 87 |
| AW-14 | HSM no. 7 | HS | 17.0 | 179.8 | 7.83 | 0.01 | 35.4 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 8.4 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 20.1 | 108.3 | 136.2 | −0.44 | −15.7 | −119.9 | Na-HCO3 | 92 | |
| AW-15 | HSM no. 5 | HS | 16.6 | 211.3 | 7.71 | 21.8 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 4.1 | 24.8 | 1.4 | 11.2 | 21.1 | 22.2 | 80.1 | 150.5 | −0.31 | −15.4 | −118.3 | Na-HCO3 | 86 | 73 | |
| AW-16 | HSM no. 3 | HS | 17.0 | 408.0 | 7.97 | 0.03 | 78.3 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 22.6 | 3.3 | 15.8 | 35.5 | 46.4 | 175.4 | 300.3 | −0.40 | −15.3 | −116.2 | Na-HCO3 | 96 | 81 |
Ion concentrations and isotopic ratios of the water samples from the Arxan volcanic region.
VO - the volcano observatory; HS - hot spring; TFL - Tuofengling; JJG - Jinjiangguo; empty cell is less than the detection limit; Na* and Cl*- calculated percentages of Na+ and Cl− derived from deep-earth fluids.
The N2, O2, Ar, CO2, CH4, and He concentrations of the gas sample were analyzed with a Finnigan MAT-271 mass spectrometer, with a precision of ±0.1%. Helium and neon isotope compositions of the gas samples were measured with an MM5400 mass spectrometer at the Laboratory of Gas Geochemistry, the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences. δ13C values of CH4 and CO2 were measured with the GC-IRMS analytical system, a gas chromatography (Agilent 6890)–stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer, and the values of C13C are reported relative to PDB in per mill with an error of ±0.5‰ (
4 Results
The temperatures of the hot spring waters are in a range of 2.3°C–37.5°C. The water temperatures of the springs no. 5 at the Hot Spring Museum and Wuliquan (at 2.5 km northwest Arxan town) are lower than those of Budonghe water (7.5°C). The water samples have low electric conductivity (40–835 μS/cm) and low TDS (23.83–540.00 mg/L). TDS values of the surface (river and lake) waters are lower than those of the hot spring waters. Abundance of the majority cations and anions is generally in the order of Na+>Ca2+>Mg2+>K+>NH4+ and HCO3−>SO42−>Cl−, NO3−>F−, respectively. δ18O and δD values of the water samples range from -4.1% to −16.0% and -61.3% to -119.9%, respectively. The lake waters are more enriched in heavy isotopes (18O and D) than the hot spring waters (Table 1).
The molecular and isotope compositions of the gas samples are listed in Table 2 including some published data (Zhao et al., 2021) in the AVR for comparison. The N2 concentrations of the gas samples from the AVR are more than 95%, and others together are less than 5%. 3He/4He ratios are in a range of 0.20×10−7 ∼ 1.64×10−6. 4He/20Ne ratios of the surface waters are approximately equal to the atmospheric value (0.32), but those of hot spring waters are much higher than the atmospheric value. CO2 concentrations are lower (0.13%–0.41%) and δ13C of CO2 from -22.3% to -6.2%. δ13C of methane (C1) from Tianchi is -51.5%, indicating the biogenic origin of C1, but δ13C of C1 from the geothermal well in JJG is 1.4‰, hinting at an abiogenic origin. 21Ne/22Ne and 20Ne/22Ne ratios are approximated by the atmospheric values (0.029 and 9.78, respectively).
TABLE 2
| Location | T °C | Sampling date | N2 | O2 | Ar | CO2 | N* | Ar* | CH4 ×10−6 | He ×10−6 | 3He/4He ×10−6 | 3He/4He | 3He/4He* | δ13CCO2 ‰PDB | δ15N ‰Air | ×103 | N2/Ne | He (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (R/RA) | Atm | LM | CR | PM | ||||||||||||||||||
| Dichi | 19.2 | 2010.08 | 95.55 | 2.15 | 1.86 | 0.34 | 91.65 | 1.76 | 98.0 | 6.0 | 1.41 | 1.01 | 1.02 | −15.9 | 1.9 | 9.96 | 0.028 | 0.44 | 0.12 | 56 | 21 | 23 | 5 |
| TFL Tianchi | 18.6 | 2010.08 | 7.0 | 1.64 | 1.17 | 1.53 | 11.50 | 0.028 | 0.36 | 68 | 23 | 9 | 6 | ||||||||||
| Tianchi | 21.8 | 2010.08 | 4.0 | 1.12 | 0.80 | 0.27 | 9.77 | 0.025 | 0.34 | 73 | 3 | 24 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Budonghe | 7.5 | 2010.08 | 9.0 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 0.44 | −18.4 | 10.06 | 0.027 | 0.62 | 39 | 12 | 48 | 3 | |||||||||
| JJG HS | 37.5 | 2010.08 | 8212.0 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 9.72 | 0.026 | 385.30 | 0 | 9 | 91 | 2 | ||||||||||
| JJG HS | 19.9 | 2010.08 | 97.19 | 0.56 | 1.73 | 0.41 | 96.17 | 1.70 | 12.0 | 7338.0 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.22 | −21.0 | 10.05 | 0.023 | 293.45 | 0.12 | 0 | 9 | 90 | 2 | |
| HSM no. 34 | 27.4 | 2010.08 | 6469.0 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.16 | −18.2 | 10.54 | 0.026 | 257.79 | 0 | 7 | 93 | 2 | |||||||||
| HSM no. 0 | 3.5 | 2010.08 | 1.0 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.16 | −22.3 | 9.80 | 0.025 | 7.03 | 3 | 7 | 90 | 2 | |||||||||
| JJG HSa | 36.6 | 2018.09 | 96.70 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.18 | 94.07 | 1.38 | 3191 | 0.238 | 0.17 | 0.17 | −6.2 | 334 | 0.30 | 0 | 7 | 93 | 2 | ||||
| JJG HSa | 36.6 | 2018.09 | 95.83 | 1.83 | 1.14 | 0.26 | 92.51 | 1.05 | 2840 | 0.196 | 0.14 | 0.14 | −8.7 | 1.3 | 152 | 0.34 | 0 | 6 | 94 | 1 | |||
| JJG HSa | 24.8 | 2018.09 | 96.60 | 1.93 | 1.19 | 0.14 | 93.10 | 1.10 | 1457 | 0.252 | 0.18 | 0.18 | −10.7 | 1.6 | 306 | 0.66 | 0 | 8 | 92 | 2 | |||
| JJG HSa | 24.8 | 2018.09 | 96.53 | 2.01 | 1.18 | 0.12 | 92.88 | 1.08 | 1585 | 0.224 | 0.16 | 0.16 | −13.7 | 1.7 | 384 | 0.61 | 0 | 7 | 93 | 2 | |||
| JJG HSa | 24.8 | 2018.09 | 96.56 | 1.97 | 1.19 | 0.13 | 92.99 | 1.09 | |||||||||||||||
| Air | 78.08 | 20.95 | 0.93 | 0.04 | 1.80 | 5.24 | 1.4 | −7 | 0 | 9.78 | 0.029 | 0.318 | 149.3 | ||||||||||
| ASWb | 17.070 | 9.409 | 0.459 | 0.245 | |||||||||||||||||||
Molecular and isotope compositions of gases from the springs and lakes in the Arxan volcanic region.
a. after Zhao et al. (2021); b. gas concentration in air-saturated water (ASW) at 3 °C (ml/L) after Weiss (1970, 1971); empty cell is no data; N*: excess N2 corrected by the N2/O2 ratio of ASW at 3 °C, N*=N2-1.814 O2; Ar*: excess Ar corrected by the O2/Ar ratio of ASW at 3 °C, Ar*=Ar-O2/20.5; 3He/4He*: ASW-corrected 3He/4He ratio; Atm: percentage of atmospheric He in the total He of the hot spring gases; LM: the estimated percentage of mantle-derived He considering the HNB 3He/4He ratio (2.1 RA) as the local mantle helium source; CR: percentage of crustal He; PM: the estimated percentage of mantle helium considering the MORB 3He/4He ratio (8 RA) as the primary mantle source; others are same as in Table 1.
5 Discussion
5.1 Origins of the water components
5.1.1 Isotopic compositions of hydrogen and oxygen
Most δ18O and δD values of the water samples are scattered nearby the global meteoric water line (GMWL, δD = 8.17δ18O + 10.35,
FIGURE 2

Plot of δ18O vs. δD; dashed line (GMWL) is the global meteoric water line (
δ18O and δD values of the rain sample (AW-0) are scattered far from the LMWL (Figure 2). The heavier isotope compositions of the rain sample are concordant with those of rain in the Hulun Lake Basin (
The surface water samples (AW-1–AW-5) were relatively enriched in heavy isotopes but depleted in the TDS (<62 mg/L) (Table 1; Figure 2). δ18O and δD values of water samples from the Dichi (a crater lake of the maar volcano) and Budonghe are similar. The water samples from the Tianchi and Tuofengling (TFL) Tianchi, two crater lakes on the volcanic cones, are more enriched in heavy isotopes. The Dujuehu is a barrier lake, whose water is more enriched in D (Table 1). The d-excess (δD-8.17δ18O) of the lake water samples is much lower than that of the LMWL (Figure 2). Such isotopic shifts can be mainly attributed to the evaporation of raindrops and lake water caused by higher evaporation capacities.
δD and δ18O values of seven water samples collected at the Hot Spring Museum and three water samples from the hot springs in JJG and previous results (Sun, 1999;
5.1.2 Ions in the waters
The TDS values of all water samples range from 23.83 to 540.00 mg/L, indicating the waters are fresh. The waters can be chemically classified into four groups, namely, Na-HCO3, Ca-HCO3, Ca·Mg-HCO3, and Na·Ca-HCO3 by Sokolov’s method (
The results of the correlation analysis for the hydrochemical parameters show that there is a strong positive correlation (r > 0.8, Table 3) between TDS and Li+, Na+, K+, NH4+, HCO3−, Cl−, F−, and SO42-, indicating that the TDS of the water samples is mainly controlled by deep-earth fluids and the dissolution of rocks. This is supported by the higher Na+ and Cl− concentrations, TDS, and temperatures of the hot spring waters and the residence time (
TABLE 3
| Li+ | Na+ | NH4+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | F− | Cl− | NO3− | SO42- | HCO3− | TDS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li+ | 1 | |||||||||||
| Na+ | 0.9936 | 1 | ||||||||||
| NH4+ | 0.7984 | 0.8227 | 1 | |||||||||
| K+ | 0.9157 | 0.9390 | 0.9112 | 1 | ||||||||
| Mg2+ | −0.2887 | −0.2589 | 0.0544 | −0.0504 | 1 | |||||||
| Ca2+ | 0.2976 | 0.3527 | 0.6378 | 0.5139 | 0.5644 | 1 | ||||||
| F− | 0.8885 | 0.8784 | 0.6884 | 0.7909 | −0.3739 | 0.3134 | 1 | |||||
| Cl− | 0.8199 | 0.8467 | 0.8677 | 0.8654 | 0.0894 | 0.7310 | 0.7802 | 1 | ||||
| NO3− | 0.3756 | 0.4200 | 0.6027 | 0.5065 | 0.3748 | 0.5490 | 0.1018 | 0.6171 | 1 | |||
| SO42- | 0.7921 | 0.7978 | 0.6969 | 0.7531 | −0.2884 | 0.4982 | 0.9334 | 0.8159 | 0.1103 | 1 | ||
| HCO3− | 0.9288 | 0.9517 | 0.8197 | 0.9361 | −0.1075 | 0.3734 | 0.7211 | 0.7880 | 0.5487 | 0.6158 | 1 | |
| TDS | 0.9659 | 0.9840 | 0.8762 | 0.9600 | −0.1488 | 0.5075 | 0.8740 | 0.9162 | 0.4867 | 0.8369 | 0.9405 | 1 |
Correlation coefficient (r) of chemical components of the water samples.
In the diagram of Na–Mg–Cl concentrations (Figure 3), the data of water samples from the AVR scatter far from the marine precipitation lines (
FIGURE 3

(A) Diagram of Na–Mg–Cl concentrations; the inset is at the enlarged left bottom corner; red dashed point and black solid lines stand for marine precipitation data from
Plagioclase is a main component of the granite, granodiorite, and andesitic basalts that are widely distributed in the AVR (Figure 1). Na and Ca cations can be dissolved into solution through the reactions between plagioclase and CO2-bearing water.
The decomposition reactions of plagioclase can be promoted by an increase in temperature, CO2 partial pressure, and a mixture of Cl-S-enriched deep-earth fluids.
The Mg/Na and K/Na ratios of the rain and surface water samples from the AVR are concordant with those of marine precipitation (
The Cl− concentrations of the rain and surface water samples are much lower than those of the hot spring waters, except for the sample AW-14 (Table 1; Figure 3), indicating the contribution of atmospheric and anthropogenic Cl to the hot spring waters is neglectable. Additionally, the values of Cl− and Na+ concentrations and Mg/Na, Cl/Na, and Cl/Mg ratios of rock solutions differ from those of the hot spring water samples (Figure 3). The Na+ concentration in the solution is about 2 magnitudes higher than Cl− concentration if granitic and andesitic rocks are dissolved in equal proportion. The experiments of soaking basalt and trachyandesite grains display that concentrations of Cl−, SO42-, and Na+ approach the highest values in short time, and then, the highest value of Cl− of about 3 mg/L show no obvious variation with increasing soaking time, while others varied with soaking time (
Cl− percentages of dissolution of rock and deep-earth fluids in the hot spring waters can be estimated by the two-member linear mixing model (Figure 4). Assuming Cl− concentration of the end member of dissolution of rock be 3 mg/L (
FIGURE 4

Source partitioning of Na–Mg–Cl ions in the AVR waters; data of deep-earth fluid after
5.2 Origins of gases
5.2.1 Molecular compositions of the hot spring gases
The measured N–He–Ar abundance system in AVR obviously differs from the gaseous components in air-saturated water (ASW) (Table 2). The ratios of N2/O2 and Ar/O2 of the samples are 44–67 and 0.07–1.11, respectively, except for 137.6 and 3.1 of the gas samples from the hot springs in JJG, which obviously differ from those of air (3.7 and 0.04) and those in ASW (1.81 and 0.03 (Weiss, 1970)). The N2/He ratios of the gas samples range from 116.4 to 663.0, obviously differing from the atmospheric (15,000) and ASW values (11,400 (Weiss, 1970; Taran, 2011)). He concentrations in the gas samples are approximately 4 magnitudes larger than the atmospheric value, but the N2/He ratios are about 2 magnitudes lower than ASW’s value, and the 4He/20Ne ratios of 257.8–385.3 of the hot spring gases are much higher than the atmospheric value (0.318 (
Sources of gases can be illustrated by the He–Ar–N2 ternary diagram (
FIGURE 5

Diagram of He–Ar–N2 concentrations of the hot spring gases in the Arxan volcanic region, M - magmatic source; H - hydrothermal source (Taran, 2011).
5.2.2 Isotopic ratios of helium, carbon, and neon
5.2.2.1 He
In most cases, helium in geothermal fluids originates from atmospheric, crustal, and mantle sources (
The samples of gases in the hot springs in AVR are characterized by low 3He/4He and CO2/3He ratios (Table 2), which obviously differ from those of hydrothermal fluids in the Wudalianchi volcanic area (low 3He/4He and high CO2/3He) in the rift valley (
The 20Ne/22Ne ratios of the gas samples are close to the atmospheric value, and the 21Ne/22Ne ratios are slightly less than the atmospheric value (Table 2), indicating that Ne is mainly derived from air. Assuming all the 20Ne in the geothermal gases is derived from air, the measured 3He/4He ratios of geothermal gases can be corrected by 4He/20Ne ratios of air or air-saturated water (
FIGURE 6

Diagram of 3He/4He vs. 4He/20Ne.
Helium derived from the crustal and mantle origins can be quantitatively estimated by the two-member mixing model using the ASW (or air)-corrected 3He/4He ratios (
5.2.2.2 CO2
Concentrations of CO2 in the hot spring gases in the AVR are less than 1%, and δ13C values are in the range of −15.9–−22.3% (Table 2). There are three scenarios for the origin of CO2 in the spring gases in the AVR. The first one is that CO2 in the hot springs is likely derived from the mantle based on the mean value of −22.6% (n = 105) of CO2 in mantle xenoliths and minerals enclosed in Cenozoic basalts in eastern China (
5.2.2.3 N2
Nitrogen, in some instances, is the main component in hot spring, fumarole, and volcanic gases, which were identified as a mixture of atmospheric, mantle, and crustal N2 (
6 Conclusion
The origins of the spring water and gases in the AVR were traced by the hydro- and gas-chemical data. Contributions of deep-earth fluids to the geothermal systems were estimated using Cl
−and Na
+concentrations, ASW-corrected
3He/
4He ratios, and the regional mantle helium isotope ratio in consideration of the heterogeneity of the upper mantle. The conclusions are remarked as follows:
1 H2O in the river, lakes, and spring waters predominantly originate from meteoric water. The small amount (<1%) of H2O derived from deep-earth fluids seems negligible for assessing the volume of geothermal fluid, but the ion contributions of deep-earth fluids to the hot spring water are significant. Ions in the rain sample were mainly derived from sea salt and continental aerosol. Ions in the surface waters have multiple sources of the continental aerosol, sea salt, rock dissolution, and anthropogenic sources, while ions in the hot spring waters are predominantly derived from deep-earth fluids. That 73%–87% of Cl− and 86%–99% of Na+ in the hot spring waters may be derived from deep-earth fluids.
2 Enrichment of heavy isotopes in the rainwater can be attributed to isotopic fractionation caused by raindrop evaporation. Heavier isotope compositions of the waters in the crater lakes may be caused by the evaporation process due to the higher evaporation capacity in the study area.
3 Atmospheric neon dissolution in the lake waters likely approached the balance state. CH4 in the hot springs isotopically displays a biogenic origin. Excess N2, Ar, and CO2 in the hot spring gases could be predominantly derived from both the crust and upper mantle sources.
4 Contributions of the mantle-derived He to bubble gases in the hot spring were estimated in a range of 3%–23%. High percentages of mantle-derived He in the bubbling gases in the crater lakes indicate gases in the mantle emit upwards through the channel for magma migration; 12% of the total He of dissolved gas in the Budonghe water is derived from the mantle, indicating deep-earth fluids transport continuously plenty of heat to the Budonghe and the geothermal systems.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
YC, LL, CX, JL, ZC, and JD conducted the field survey. YC and JD processed the data and prepared the first draft. All co-authors edited the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2019YFC1509203), the Open Foundation of the United Laboratory of High Pressure Physics and Earthquake Science (2019HPPES08), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41403099).
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Ruijie Zhang in the Arxan Observatory of Volcano for his help in the field trip and Zhaofei Liu and Jianan Huang for drawing the figures. They are extremely grateful to the four reviewers for their constructive comments and patience during discussion.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling editor MZ declared a past co-authorship with the author YL.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AmitaK.OhsawaS.DuJ.YamadaM. (2005). Origin of Arima-type deep thermal water from hot spring wells in Oita Plain, eastern Kyushu, Japan. Hot Spring Sci.55 (2), 64–77. (in Japanese wiith English abstract).
2
BaiZ.TianM.WuF. (2005). Yanshan, gaoshan: Two active volcanoes of the volcanic cluster in arxan, inner Mongolia. Earthq. Res. China21 (1), 113–117. (In Chinese with English abstract).
3
BallentineC. J.BurgessR.MartyB. (2002). “Tracing fluid origin, transport and interaction in the crust,” in Mineralogy and Geochemistry47 (1), 539–614.10.2138/rmg.2002.47.13
4
BarryP. H.Negrete-ArandaR.SpelzR. M.SeltzerA. M.BekaertD. V.VirruetaC.et al (2020). Volatile sources, sinks and pathways: A helium-carbon isotope study of baja California fluids and gases. Chem. Geol.550, 119722. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119722
5
BenaventeO.TassiF.ReichM.AguileraF.CapecchiacciF.GutiérrezF.et al (2016). Chemical and isotopic features of cold and thermal fluids discharged in the Southern Volcanic Zone between 32.5°S and 36°S: Insights into the physical and chemical processes controlling fluid geochemistry in geothermal systems of Central Chile. Chem. Geol.420, 97–113. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.11.010
6
BiniG.ChiodiniG.CaliroS.TassiF.VaselliO.RizzoA. L.et al (2022). Nitrogen, helium, and argon reveal the magmatic signature of fumarole gases and episodes of outgassing from upper-crustal magma reservoirs: The case of the Nisyros caldera (Aegean Arc, Greece). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta335, 68–84. 10.1016/j.gca.2022.08.028
7
ChenJ.WangW.MaF. (2021). Recharge source and Genesis analysis of Cenozoic basalt groundwater in Arshan. J. Hohai Univ. Nat. Sci.)49 (3), 249–256. (In Chinese with English abstract). 10.3876/j.issn.1000-1980.2021.03.007
8
ChenZ.DuJ.ZhouX.YiL.LiuL.XieC.et al (2014). Hydrochemistry of the hot springs in Western Sichuan province related to the Wenchuan MS 8.0 earthquake. Sci. World J.2014 (1), 1–13. 10.1155/2014/901432
9
CuiY.SunF.DuJ. (2022). Methods for identification of seismic geochemical precursors and source partitioning of hot spring fluids in Eastern Chinese Mainland. J. Seismol. Res.45 (2), 199–216. (In Chinese with English abstract). 10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2022.0053
10
DaiJ.SongY.DaC. (1996). Geochemistry and accumulation of carbon dioxide gases in China. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull.80, 1615–1626. 10.1306/64EDA0D2-1724-11D7-8645000102C1865D
11
DeinesP. (2002). The carbon isotope geochemistry of mantle xenoliths. Earth. Sci. Rev.58 (3-4), 247–278. 10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00064-8
12
DuJ.AmidaK.OhsawaS.ZhangY.KangC.YamadaM. (2010). Experimental evidence on imminent and short-term hydrochemical precursors for earthquake. App. Geochem.25, 586–592. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.01.015
13
DuJ.ChengW.ZhangY.JianC.GuanZ.LiuW.et al (2006). Helium and carbon isotopic compositions of thermal springs in the earthquake zone of Sichuan, Southwestern China. J. Asian Earth Sci.26, 533–539. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.11.006
14
DuJ.LiS.ZhaoY.RenJ.SunR.DuanmuH. (1999). Geochemical characteristics of gases from the volcanic area Wudalianchi, Northeastern China. Acta Geol. Sin.73 (2), 103–107. 10.1111/j.1755-6724.1999.tb00830.x
15
DuJ.LiuC.FuB.ZhangY.WangC.WangH.et al (2005). Variations of geothermometry and chemical-isotopic compositions of hot spring fluids in the Rehai geothermal field, southwestern China. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.142 (3-4), 243–261. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.11.009
16
DuJ.LiuW. (1991). Isotopic geochemistry of nonhydrocarbons in natural gas from sanshui basin, guangdong province. Chin. J. Geochem.10 (4), 318–325. 10.1007/BF02841092
17
FanQ.ZhaoY.LiD.WuY.SuiJ.ZhengD. (2011). Studies on Quaternary volcanism stages of Halahe river and Chaoer river area in the Great Xing’an Range: Evidence from K-Ar dating and volcanic geology features. Acta Pet. Sin.27 (10), 2827–2832.
18
FanW.GuoF.WangY. J.LinG. (2003). Late Mesozoic calc-alkaline volcanism of post-orogenic extension in the northern Da Hinggan Mountains, northeastern China. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.121 (1), 115–135. 10.1016/S0377-0273(02)00415-8
19
GaoH.LiC.SunB.ShiX.ZhaoS.FanC. (2018). Characteristics of hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes in Lake Hulun Basin and its indicative function in evaporation. J. Lake Sci.30 (1), 211–219. 10.18307/2018.0121
20
GiggenbachW. F.SanoY.WakitaH. (1993). Isotopes of He, and CO2 and CH4 contents in gases produced along the New Zealand part of a convergent plate boundary. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta57, 3427–3455. 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90549-C
21
GislasonS. R.HansP. E. (1987). Meteoric water-basalt interactions. I: A laboratory study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta51 (10), 2827–2840. 10.1016/0016-7037(87)90161-X
22
GislasonS. R.VeblenD. R.LiviK. J. T. (1993). Experimental meteoric water-basalt interactions: Characterization and interpretation of alteration products. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta57 (7), 1459–1471. 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90006-I
23
GrahamD. W. (2002). “Noble gas isotope geochemistry of mid-ocean ridge and ocean island basalts: Characterization of mantle source reservoirs,” in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (1), 47, 247–318.10.2138/rmg.2002.47.8
24
GuX.ZhangQ.CuiY.ShaoJ.XiaoY.ZhangP.et al (2017). Hydrogeochemistry and genesis analysis of thermal and mineral springs in arxan, northeastern China. Water9 (1), 61–17. 10.3390/w9010061
25
HanZ.ShiX.JiaK.SunB.ZhaoS.FuC. (2019). Determining the discharge and recharge relationships between lake and groundwater in Lake Hulun using hydrogen and oxygen isotopes and chloride ions. Water11 (2), 264. 10.3390/w11020264
26
HiltonD. R. (1996). The helium and carbon isotope systematics of a continental geothermal system: results from monitoring studies at Long Valley caldera (California, U.S.A.). Chem. Geol.127, 269–295. 10.1016/0009-2541(95)00134-4
27
JiaZ.ZhangG. (2020). Teleseismic tomography for imaging the upper mantle beneath northeast China. Appl. Sci. (Basel).10 (13), 4557. 10.3390/app10134557
28
KeeneW. C.PszennyA. A. P.GallowayJ. N.HawleyM. E. (1986). Sea-salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation. J. Geophys. Res.91 (D6), 6647. 10.1029/JD091iD06p06647
29
LiJ. (2020). “Isotopic hydrochemical study of geothermal fluids in volcanic geothermal system,”. M.A. thesis (Xi’an, China: Chang’an University). (In Chinese with English abstract).
30
LiX.ZhangM.MaQ.LiY.WangS.WangB. (2012). Characteristics of stable isotopes in precipitation over northeast China and its water vapor sources. J. Env. Sci.33 (9), 2924–2931. (In Chinese with English abstract).
31
LiY.GaoR.YaoY.MiS.LiW.XiongX.et al (2014). The crust velocity structure of Da Hinggan Ling orgenic belt and the basins on both sides. Prog. Geophys.29 (1), 315–541. 10.6038/pg20140110
32
LiZ.TaoM.LiL.WangZ.DuL.ZhangM. (2007). Determination of isotope composition of dissolved inorganic carbon by gas chromatography-conventional isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Chin. J. Anal. Chem.35, 1455–1458. 10.1016/S1872-2040(07)60089-9
33
LiangL.LiC.ShiX.SunB.WangJ.ZhouJ. (2017). Characteristics of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes of surface and ground water and the analysis of source of Lake water in Hulun Lake. Wetl. Sci.15 (3), 385–390. 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2017.03.010
34
LiuJ.HanJ.FyfeW. S. (2001). Cenozoic episodic volcanism and continental rifting in northeast China and possible link to Japan Sea development as revealed from K-Ar geochronology. Tectonophysics339, 385–401. 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00132-9
35
LiuJ.SongX.YuanG.SunX.YangL. (2014). Stable isotopic compositions of precipitation in China. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorology66 (1), 22567. 10.3402/tellusb.v66.22567
36
PorcelliD.BallentineC. J.WielerR. (2002). “An overview of noble gas geochemistry and cosmochemistry,” in Noble gases in Geochemistry and cosmochemistry. Editors PorcelliD.BallentineC.WielerR.Rev. Mineral. Geochem. (Washington DC: Mineralogical Society of America), 47, 1–19.
37
QiF.ZhangF.LuS.SunY. (2012). The geothermal geological features of Arxan mountains. Jinlin Geol.31 (2), 109–102. (In Chinese with English abstract).
38
RandazzoP.CaracausiA.AiuppaA.CardelliniC.ChiodiniG.ApollaroC.et al (2022). Active degassing of crustal CO2 in areas of tectonic collision: A case study from the Pollino and Calabria sectors (Southern Italy). Front. Earth Sci.10, 946707. 10.3389/feart.2022.946707
39
RizzoA. L.CaracausiA.ChavagnacV.NomikouP.PolymenakouP. N.MandalakisM.et al (2019). Geochemistry of CO2-rich gases venting from submarine volcanism: The Case of Kolumbo (Hellenic Volcanic Arc, Greece). Front. Earth Sci.7, 60. 10.3389/feart.2019.00060
40
RobertsonE.BiggsJ.EdmondsM.ClorL.FischerT. P.Vye-BrownC.et al (2016). Diffuse degassing at Longonot volcano, Kenya: Implications for CO2 flux in continental rifts. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.327, 208–222. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.06.016
41
RoulleauE.VinetN.SanoY.TakahataN.ShinoharaH.OokiM.et al (2015). Effect of the volcanic front migration on helium, nitrogen, argon, and carbon geochemistry of hydrothermal/magmatic fluids from Hokkaido volcanoes, Japan. Chem. Geol.414, 42–58. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.08.006
42
RozanskiK.Araguas-AraguasL.GonfiantinniR. (1993). “Isotopic patterns in modern global precipitation,” in The climate change in continental isotopic records. Editors SwartP. K.LohmannK. C.McKenzieJ. (Washington, DC, USA: American Geophysical Union), 78, 1–36. 10.1029/GM078p0001
43
SanoY.MartyB. (1995). Origin of carbon in fumarolic gas from island arcs. Chem. Geol.119 (1-4), 265–274. 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00097-R
44
SanoY.NakamuraY.WakitaH. (1985). Areal distribution of 3He/4He ratios in the Tohoku district, Northeastern Japan. Chem. Geol. Isot. Geosci. Sect.52 (1), 1–8. 10.1016/0168-9622(85)90004-1
45
SekiK.OhbaT.AoyamaS.UenoY.SuminoH.KandaW.et al (2019). Variations in thermal state revealed by the geochemistry of fumarolic gases and hot-spring waters of the Tateyama volcanic hydrothermal system, Japan. Bull. Volcanol.81, 8. 10.1007/s00445-018-1264-7
46
ShangguanZ.KongL.SunF.GaoS. (1996). Deep-seated fluid components and stable isotopic compositions in Tianchi volcanic area, Changbaishan Mountains. Chin. J. Geol.31 (1), 54–64. (In Chinese with English abstract).
47
ShawA. M.HiltonD. R.FischerT. P.WalkerJ.AlvaradoG. (2003). Contrasting He–C relationships in Nicaragua and Costa Rica: insights into C cycling through subduction zones. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.214, 499–513. 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00401-1
48
ShenZ.CaoJ.ArimotoR.ZhangR.JieD.LiuS.et al (2007). Chemical composition and source characterization of spring aerosol over Horqin sand land in northeastern China. J. Geophys. Res.112, D14315. 10.1029/2006JD007991
49
SokolovD. S. (1966). Hydrogeology in U.S.S.R (Moscow: Publishing House Nedra), 1, 432. (in Russian).
50
SongY.FreyF. A. (1989). Geochemistry of peridotite xenoliths in basalt from Hannuoba, Eastern China: Implications for subcontinental mantle heterogeneity. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta53, 97–113. 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90276-7
51
SuiJ.FanQ.XuY. (2012). Discovery of peridotite xenoliths from the Nuomin river Quaternary volcaniv field, the Grea Xing’an Range, and its geological significance. Acta petro. Sin.28 (4), 1130–1138.
52
SunC. (1999). “Study of geothermal structure of hot springs in Arxan,”. master's thesis (Changchun, China: Jilin University). (In Chinese with English abstract).
53
SunY.GuoZ.FortinD. (2020). Carbon dioxide emission from monogenetic volcanoes in the Mt. Changbai volcanic field, NE China. Int. Geol. Rev.63 (14), 1803–1820. 10.1080/00206814.2020.1802782
54
TangJ.WangJ.ChenX.ZhaoG.ZhanY. (2005). A Preliminary Investigation on Electric Structure of the Crust and Upper Mantle in Arxan Volcanic Area. Chin. J. Geophys.48 (1), 214–221. 10.1002/cjg2.642
55
TangS. (1984). Feature of the Late Jurassic volcanic structure and genetic mechanism of hot springs in Arxan. Jilin Geol.38(1), 54–65. (In Chinese with English abstract).
56
TaranY. A. (2009). Geochemistry of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids and volatile budget of the Kamchatka–Kuril subduction zone. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta73, 1067–1094. 10.1016/j.gca.2008.11.020
57
TaranY. A. (2011). N2, Ar, and He as a tool for discriminating sources of volcanic fluids with application to Vulcano. Bull. Volcanol.73 (4), 395–408. 10.1007/s00445-011-0448-1
58
TardaniD.ReichM.RoulleauE.TakahataN.SanoY.Pérez-FloresP.et al (2016). Exploring the structural controls on helium, nitrogen and carbon isotope signatures in hydrothermal fluids along an intra-arc fault system. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta184, 193–211. 10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.031
59
TsujimuraM.AbeY.TanakaT.ShimadaJ.HiguchiS.YamanakaT.et al (2007). Stable isotopic and geochemical characteristics of groundwater in Kherlen River basin, a semi-arid region in eastern Mongolia. J. Hydrol. X.333 (1), 47–57. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.026
60
WeiF.XuJ.ShangguanZ.PanB.YuH.WeiW.et al (2016). Helium and carbon isotopes in the hot springs of Changbaishan Volcano, northeastern China: A material connection between Changbaishan Volcano and the west Pacific plate?J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.327, 398–406. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.09.005
61
WeissR. F. (1971). Solubility of helium and neon in water and seawater. J. Chem. Eng. Data16 (2), 235–241. 10.1021/je60049a019
62
WeissR. F. (1970). The solubility of nitrogen, oxygen and argon in water and seawater. Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr.17 (4), 721–735. 10.1016/0011-7471(70)90037-9
63
XieH.TianJ.WuL.ZhuY.WuC.ShenK.et al (2011). Age of ore-forming granites in Aershan area of Inner Mongolia and its significance for prospecting. J. Jilin Univ. (Earth Sci. Ed.)41 (5), 1432–1440.
64
XuS.LiuC. (2002). Abundance and isotope ratios of noble gas in mantle xenoliths from northeastern China. Chin. Sci. Bull.47 (2), 141–146. (In Chinese).
65
XuS.ZhengG.NakaiS.WakitaH.WangX.GuoZ. (2013). Hydrothermal He and CO2 at Wudalianchi intra-plate volcano, NE China. J. Asian Earth Sci.62, 526–530. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.11.001
66
XueX.ChenL.LiuJ.HeY.WangX.ZengG.et al (2019). Primordial peridotitic mantle component in asthenosphere beneath Northeast China: Geochemical evidence from Cenozoic basalts of Greater Khingan Range. Earth Sci.44 (4), 1143–1158. 10.3799/dqkx.2019.951
67
ZhangL.ChenZ.NieZ.LiuF.JiaY.ZhangX. (2008). Correlation between δ18O in precipitation and surface air temperature on different time-scale in China. Nucl. Tech.31(9), 715–720. (In Chinese with English abstract).
68
ZhangP. (2017). “Hydrochemical characteristics and water rock interaction of Arxan Springs,”. master’s theses (Beijing, China: China University of Geosciences).
69
ZhangW.DuJ.ZhouX.WangF. (2016). Mantle volatiles in spring gases in the Basin and Range Province on the west of Beijing, China: Constraints from helium and carbon isotopes. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.309, 45–52. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.10.024
70
ZhaoD. (1987). Cenozoic Basalts and Plutonic Inclusions in Eastern China, Beijing, China: Science Press, 490. (In Chinese)
71
ZhaoW.GuoZ.LeiM.ZhangM.MaL.FortinD.et al (2019). Volcanogenic CO2 degassing in the Songliao continental rift system, NE China. Geofluids2019, 1–14. 10.1155/2019/8053579
72
ZhaoW.GuoZ.LiuJ.ZhangM.SunY.LeiM.et al (2021). Fluxes and Genesis of carbon dioxide emissions from Cenozoic volcanic fields in NE China. Ata Pet. Sin.37 (4), 1255–1269. 10.18654/1000-0569/2021.04.17
73
ZhaoY. (2010). dissertation. Beijing, China: Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.Study on Geology and Geochemistry of Quaternary Volcanoes in the Da Hinggan Ling Mountains,
74
ZhouX.WangW.ChenZ.YiL.LiuL.XieC.et al (2015). Gas geochemistry of hot springs in Western Sichuan Province, China after the Wenchuan MS 8.0 earthquake. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci.26 (4), 361–373. 10.3319/tao.2015.01.05.01(tt)
Summary
Keywords
geothermal system, Arxan volcanic region, hot spring water, 3He/4He ratio, fluids
Citation
Cui Y, Sun F, Liu L, Xie C, Li J, Chen Z, Li Y and Du J (2023) Contribution of deep-earth fluids to the geothermal system: A case study in the Arxan volcanic region, northeastern China. Front. Earth Sci. 10:996583. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.996583
Received
17 July 2022
Accepted
14 November 2022
Published
13 January 2023
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Maoliang Zhang, Tianjin University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Cui, Sun, Liu, Xie, Li, Chen, Li and Du.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ying Li, subduction6@hotmail.com; Jianguo Du, jianguodu@hotmail.com
This article was submitted to Geochemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.