Abstract
Continental carbonates, such as travertines and tufas, formed from CO2-rich groundwater degassing as it emerges at the Earth’s surface, are often associated with major crustal-scale faults. The Carraclaca site, in the Lorca-Totana section of the Alhama de Murcia Fault, Spain, presents a complex geomorphological landscape controlled by active tectonics. The geology here records the interaction between Quaternary alluvial fans, travertines, and a pop-up structure developed in a transpressional section of the fault. The Alhama de Murcia Fault is an 80 km long left-lateral strike-slip fault that is one of the main seismogenic structures in the Iberian Peninsula. In this work, we examined the relation between travertine precipitation in the Carraclaca site and the tectonic activity of this fault zone through morphological and geochemical studies. The δ13C and δ18O isotopic signals indicate that the carbonate deposits are hydrothermal. In addition, the 87Sr/86Sr ratios in the samples suggest subsurface fluid interaction with the Miocene sediments and the Alpujárride basement, located below the alluvial deposits. Tectonic activity in the Alhama de Murcia Fault might generate the opening of deep water circulation in the crust every time a seismic event occurs, giving rise to hydrothermally derived carbonates precipitation. Deep waters rise and reach the surface interacting with meteoric waters, resulting in travertine formation. Therefore, the Carraclaca carbonate deposits study can inform us about the seismogenic cycle of the fault in the Lorca-Totana section.
1 Introduction
The study of travertine associated with fault activity has been the subject of several research studies (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). Travertine precipitation occurs in the presence of CO2 dissolved in groundwater, and is a good indicator of fault-controlled hydrologic systems. Some travertine characteristics such as location, shape, or age provide information about the faults and fractures that trigger fluid circulation, especially concerning structural patterns and the permeability (; ; ; ; ; ; ). In most of cases, travertine deposits are associated with normal faults. Few studies have focused on travertines associated with strike-slip faults (; ; ; ; ; ).
Some paleoseismic studies carried out in regions having moderate to high seismicity used travertine and speleothem dating for seismic event identification taking advantage of its cyclical nature of precipitation (; ; ; ). use travertine deposits related with active fault considering their morphology, location, and deformation. They use the term “travitonics” for the study of the tectonic implications of those carbonate deposits. Geochemical analyses performed on travertine associated with structural features suggest that CO2-rich deep water travels to the surface through faults and fractures () since these are the pathways for hydrothermal fluids to rise (). These carbonate deposits are called thermogenic travertines (), and are excellent indicators of the tectonic activity pattern in hydrothermal environments. The process would be as follows: acidic water that has dissolved the carbonate parent rock at depth travels to the surface where it degasses, producing travertine precipitation. The activity of the faults, due to their episodic character, gives rise to different precipitation cycles of CaCO3. Therefore, it is feasible to detect deposition sequences associated with their recurrence. Knowing the geochemistry, morphology, structure, and age of each precipitation episode is the clue to comprehending the nature of these travertine deposits and its possible relation with the seismic cycle of faults.
In this study, we analyze the Carraclaca travertine deposits (Figures 1, 2), at the La Tercia Range Mountain front, along the NW edge of the Guadalentin Tectonic Depression. The travertine outcrop is along the trace of the northern branch of the Alhama de Murcia Fault (AMF), one of the three main strands in this section of the fault. This study area represents a perfect scenario for establishing connections between active tectonics and hydrothermal systems through geological and geochemical analysis of travertines.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

Geological-structural map of the Carraclaca area showing main fault traces and travertine deposits and related geological cross sections through the pop-up structure.
To date, paleoseismic studies through trench analysis have been the only carried out to determine seismic events in the Lorca-Totana segment of the AMF (
The possibility that the travertine formation at Carraclaca is linked to the seismic cycle of the AMF (
Herein, we describe the Carraclaca travertine deposits through their lithological and morphological types and the analysis of stable isotopes (δ13C and δ 18O) and Sr isotopes that have implications for fluid flow. Many authors have shown that stable isotope analyses help to understand the genesis of continental carbonate deposits such as travertines and tufas (
We conclude by proposing a conceptual model of the hydrological system that fed the spring of the travertine deposit.
2 Geological setting
Montenat first described the AMF in 1973. This is an 80 km long, NE-SW trending sinistral strike-slip fault with a reverse component. It is part of the Betic segment of the Trans-Alboran Shear Zone and it is located in the Eastern Betics Shear Zone (EBSZ) (
3 Carraclaca site
The study area is located in the Lorca-Totana section of the AMF, where the deformation is distributed in several branches that produce a wide deformation area (Figures 1, 2). The northwest strand bounds to the north with Sierra de la Tercia, the main mountain range in the area. Between the northwest and central branches, the fault movement forms a sinking area covered by Late Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits. The southern strand controls the position of the younger Holocene fans in the Guadalentín depression to the southeast (
The Carraclaca site is located on the northern branch of the fault, 5 km northeast of Lorca city (Figure 1). The Carraclaca spring outcrop was first described in detail by Armijo in 1977, who interpreted the site as a monoclinal fold affecting Quaternary deposits. According to
The Carraclaca site has a pop-up structure generated by the uplift of the wedge block bounded by the northern branch of the main fault and a secondary fault (Figure 2). The faults here trend N60ºE, and the coaxial component of the transpression creates a double monocline fold driven by the upward extrusion of the block that affects the recent deposits (Figure 2).
The Carraclaca pop-up affects a thin, hardened Lower Pleistocene surface derived from slope debris deposits, hereafter referred to as glacis, which is highly resistant to erosion. That preserves the monoclinal folding geometry and acts as a shield for the alluvial fans flowing from the northern range. These Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial fans result from the fault activity along the southern limit of the La Tercia Range. There were two phases of aggradation, one in the Middle Pleistocene followed by a second phase in the Late Pleistocene to Holocene (
In the Carraclaca area, there are several springs aligned with the fault planes located at the intersection with minor NNE-SSW and NW-SE fractures. There, the waters rise to the surface producing a square kilometer of travertine formations that cover the tectonic block uplifted by the faults. Some travertines are deformed, following the monocline geometry (Figure 2).
4 Carraclaca travertines
The travertine deposits described in this study occur in the surroundings of the old thermal spring of Carraclaca, active until the last century (Figure 3). At present, the thermal pools are abandoned, possibly because of the low water flow from the current springs (0.3 L/s, according to
FIGURE 3

The central photo corresponds to an interpretative diagram of the Carraclaca aerial view. The red lines are the faults that limit the tectonic block lifted by two branches of the Alhama de Murcia fault at the base of La Tercia range. The black lines indicate a non-active fault affecting Miocene deposits. Blue coloured areas show travertine deposits. The numbers in the central image refer to the different materials present in the area. (1) Glacis crust. (2) Yellow marls. (3) Red conglomerates and Blue marls. The yellow dots show the position of the water source samples. The letters (A–J) indicate sampling sites. (A) Samples S1 to S4. (B) Sample S6. (C) Sample S5. (D) Samples S7 and S8. (E) Sample S12. (F) Samples S9 to S11. (G) Samples S13 and S14. (H) Samples S15 to S17. (I) Sample S18 (J) Samples S19 and S20.
To characterize Carraclaca’s carbonate deposits, we have analyzed the travertine morphotypes and lithotypes present in the area, as well as the sedimentary structures. The travertine distribution consists of isolated patches overlying the Miocene deposits of the Lorca basin. Several depositional units composed of bedded travertines (Figure 4) form the carbonates. These deposits record different morphologies and lithofacies along the discharge path of the rising waters. Bedded travertines were considered the main layers formed during the precipitation of calcium carbonate from saturated water (
FIGURE 4

Field images of the different outcrops in Carraclaca site. (A) Fluvial scarp where travertine precipitates with cascade-type morphologies. (B) Fault scarp related to the pop-up structure where travertines with cascade morphotypes precipitate. (C) Banded travertine of fracture or fault filling. It shows crystalline crustal lithofacies. (D) Bedded travertine with crystalline crust. lithofacies.
FIGURE 5

Field photographs of the different outcrops in Carraclaca site. (A) Close-up view of a fissure ridges travertine. The long central axis trends in a N-S direction and runs parallel to the secondary fracturing direction. (B) Close-up view of a crystalline crust travertine lithotype. (C) Example of travertine deposit with a Fine-grained lithoclast lithofacies. (D) Bedded travertine with paper-thin raft lithofacies. (E) Close-up view of a minidam sedimentary structure. We can observe the irregular nature of the dams with a rough area inside and polished walls.
We have identified two main travertine morphotypes in Carraclaca: fissure ridge and cascades.
4.1 Fissure ridge travertine
Fissure ridges are elongated travertine deposits several hundred meters long formed by the connection between multiple aligned sources. They are mound-shaped and have the main opening at the top (
FIGURE 6

Field images of the bedded and banded travertine relationship. Banded travertine are the result of travertine precipitation filling faults or fractures, and bedded travertine are developed on slopes. In this case, both types of travertine have a crystalline crust lithotype (see the detail images).
4.2 Cascades travertine
The cascade morphotype is typical of areas where the main water channel is accompanied by several smaller currents with reduced flows. On the areas where the water flows, mosses and hanging plants typical of waterfall deposits develop, sometimes covered with carbonate in the form of speleothems (
Associated with these morphologies, at the Carraclaca site, we find sedimentary structures that
Regarding the texture, granulometry, mineralogy and depositional setting that we can observe in the Carraclaca travertine deposits, we have distinguished four travertine lithotypes, as described by Guo and Riding (1998): crystalline crust; fine-grained lithoclast; paper-thin raft; and reed.
4.3 Crystalline crust travertine
This travertine lithotype consists of different layers, ranging from transparent to grey in color, that are probably the result of changes in water chemistry or in the rate of the water flow. The crystalline crust travertines reflect rapid precipitation from fast-flowing waters (Guo and Riding, 1998). That implies a low porosity deposit, although sometimes some porosity may appear between different layers (
FIGURE 7

Crystalline crust travertine. (A) Polished slab with different coloured crystalline travertine and parallel-banded growth. (B) SEM image showing large calcite crystals and irregular oxides bands (C and D) Thin section with parallel and crossed nicols respectively. Fanshaped crystals alternating with isometric crystals forming crystalline crust travertine.
According to
4.4 Fine-grained lithoclast travertine
Lithoclastic travertine is formed by fragments of travertine derived from the rupture of adjacent deposits (Guo and Riding, 1998). According to
FIGURE 8

Fine-grained lithoclast travertine. (A) Hand specimen photo (B) SEM image showing high porosity and small carbonate crystals (C and D) Microscopic view plane polarized light and crossed nicols respectively. In both, sparry cement lining lithoclasts is visible.
4.5 Paper-thin raft travertine
The paper-thin raft lithotype is described in Guo and Riding (1998) and
FIGURE 9

Paper-thin raft travertine. (A) Polished slab of paper-thin raft travertine. (B) SEM image showing the growth of calcite crystals in bands separated by pores with crystalline regrowth at their boundaries (C and D) Thin section with parallel and crossed nicols respectively. In the microscopic images, we have micritic cores of paper-thin rafts embedded with scattered calcite crystals.
4.6 Reed travertine
According to Guo and Riding (1998), reed travertines are those formed by the precipitation of calcium carbonate around branches or stems. In thermal zones, the high density of plants creates a barrier to water flow. The root systems stabilize the sediment, then the carbonate dissolved in the water is precipitated in contact with the vegetation, crystallizing all the space in between. The roots create cylindrical molds covered by micritic travertine. The vegetation usually disappears and leaves gaps filled with fine-grained material. In the Carraclaca site, we have found these lithofacies associated with cascade-type morphologies in the foothills of travertine deposits (Figure 3A). Microscope and SEM images show high porosity and calcite crystal precipitation in concentric bands around the roots or stems (Figure 10). Sparry cement lining lithoclasts are also visible.
FIGURE 10

Reed travertine. (A) Polished slab with the plant cast filled with detritic material in the central zone and concentric carbonate precipitation. (B) SEM image showing calcite crystal laminae composed of vertical arborescent structures alternating with micritic levels. We can also observe recrystallization bands crossing the sample (C and D) Thin section with parallel and crossed nicols respectively. We observed high porosity and the carbonate growth with concentric disposition alternating with detrital material.
5 Sampling and analytical procedures
We sampled 20 Quaternary travertines throughout the study area for geochemical and mineralogical analysis (Figure 3). Some were divided into more than one sample due to differences in color, texture, and composition. For sampling, we have considered the lithotypes found in the outcrop and homogeneous spatial distribution. We have also tried to encompass the different structural aspects of the study area. The objective is to have a complete picture of carbonate formation in the Carraclaca site and to determine if this could be associated with the AMF seismic activity. For our study, we have also taken samples of different lithologies on which the Carraclaca carbonates precipitate and through which water has probably circulated. These rocks are part of the Miocene formations that cover the metamorphic basement rocks uplifted by the fault (see geologic map, Figure 2). They include blue marls and red conglomerates of the Serravallian-Tortonian, Tortonian calcarenites and yellow marls, sandy marls and s.l. marls of the Upper Tortonian-Messinian. To complete the collection from the study area, we took samples from the current water sources (Figure 11) in order to analyze them from a geochemical and mineralogical point of view.
FIGURE 11

(A) Water spring in cave associated with the north branch of the pop-up structure. G1, G2, G4a and F1 are samples of different materials analyzed in this work. A water sample has been taken from the upwelling for geochemical analysis (sample SC see Figure 3 for location). (B) Close-up view of a water source formed on the slope of the Carraclaca pop-up structure, 150 m south of the cave. The water sample taken at this point has been analyzed for this work (sample SH, see Figure 3 for location).
5.1 Water chemistry
Throughout the Carraclaca pop-up structure, there are small water upwellings. The most important one is located in the spring inside a small cave in the northern branch of the structure. That is the principal water catchment point used historically by the now abandoned thermal baths until the first half of the 20th century. For this study, we have analyzed the water from that point (sample CS) and from a smaller spring located about 150 m southeast of the cave (sample HS) (Figure 11). The analysis of the current spring water can give us information about its origin and its relationship with the travertines in the area if any. Water samples were analyzed with a Metrohm dual 861 ionic Chromatograph to determine primary ions. For measuring the anions composition (F, Cl, Br, NO2, NO3, PO4, SO4), a mixture of carbonate (1.8 mM) and bicarbonate (1.7 mM) was used as eluent. The detection limit is around 0.1 mg/L. To determine the concentration of the major cations (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Sr) chromatographic columns with diluted HNO3 acid as eluent (1.7 mmol/L) were applied with condutimetric detection. The detection limits are 1 mg/L for Ca and Na and 0.4 mg/L for Mg and K. Alkalinity concentrations were determined by potentiometric titration. Trace elements were measured on the water samples, previously acidulated with suprapure nitric acid with an ICP Spectrometer SPECTRO ARCOS, equipped with a Paschen-Runge optical system and a wave length range between 130 nm and 780 nm. Analytical measurements were performed operating with a modified Lichte Nebulizer to enhance the sensitivity. Detection limits are around 1 ppb, depending on the element.
5.2 Stable isotope analysis
Carbon and oxygen isotopes (δ13C and δ18O) were measured in carbonate samples by Isotope-Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) VG PRISM II™. The samples were weighed in exetainer vials, vacuum dried, and H3PO4 added. After 18 h at 72°C ± 1°C, the analysis was performed by continuous flow IRMS, with analytical precision ±0.1‰. The Carbon and Oxygen data were normalized using international standards (V-PDB) at the Laboratory of Stable Isotope Geochemistry of the Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM).
We have also determined stable isotopes for water samples collected from active springs and geological deposits found in the study area. The aim is to acquire the isotopic signature of these materials in order to discover the relationship between them and the carbonate deposits. Values of δ2H and δ18O were determined using CRDS spectroscopy (Cavity Ring-down Spectroscopy, CRDS). Samples were analyzed with a Picarro model L2120 water isotope analyzer coupled with an A0211 high-precision vaporizer. Isotopic deviations δ (‰) are provided related to V-SMOW. Values presented in this paper refer to the isotopic ratios 18O/16O as well as to 2H/H, expressed by δ2H ‰ and δ18O ‰, allowing a linear fit in a wide range of d values.
5.4 Mineralogical composition
We have analyzed the carbonate samples collected in the field to identify the mineralogical composition using the X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique. The XRD patterns were registered on a Panalytical X-PERT instrument θ/2θ with an X-CELERATOR detector. The mineralogical composition was determined through the Reference Intensity Ratio (RIR) method, which can be considered semi-quantitative. The International Centre of Diffraction Data (ICDD) powder diffraction files (PDF) standards supported in High Score Expert Plus© software (version 2.1. b 2005) were used for mineral checking.
We have made an XRD analysis of the 27 travertine samples (Table 3), six sedimentary rocks samples that form the Carraclaca pop-up structure, and four samples of materials found in the cave where the main active upwelling appears (Figure 11; Table 4).
5.3 Strontium isotopic ratios and strontium content
In order to identify the relation to potential source rocks of the tufa and travertine deposited carbonates deposited, strontium content and isotopic composition analyses have been carried out on the travertines (
Sr isotopic ratios were measured in a SF-ICP-MS from the Isotope Laboratory at the Centre for Energy, Environmental and Technological Research (CIEMAT) in Madrid, following the methodology described below. A 0.1 g of powdered rock was digested overnight in HNO3 and evaporated to dryness. The residue is dissolved in 2.0 M suprapur nitric acid, and Sr separated of the major cations by conventional ion-exchange chromatography (Sr resin, Eichrom). Sr is recovered from the resin by elution with 2% nitric acid. The samples were measured using the standard bracketing method with an Element two SF-ICP-MS (Thermo Finnigan, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a guard electrode to eliminate secondary discharge in the plasma and to enhance overall sensitivity. The high resolution double focusing (reverse Niers–Johnson geometry) single collector ICP-MS instrument provides flat top peaks in the low resolution mode (m/m 300) which was used for the analysis of 85Rb, 87Sr and 86Sr A sample introduction kit consisting of a PFA microflow nebulizer, a Peltier-cooled spray cyclonic chamber and a sapphire injector tube (ESI Inc., Omaha, NE, United States) were employed to transport the analytes into the plasma of the ICP-MS. This configuration increases the sensitivity and stability of the conventional sample introduction setup. The solutions were introduced into the plasma using a PFA nebuliser, operating in self-aspiration mode at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. Regarding reagents and standards, all the solutions were prepared with high purity water (18.2 MV cm) from a MilliQ-Element system designed for ultra-trace analysis (Millipore, Milford, MA, United States). Nitric acid (65%, analytical-reagent grade, Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain) was further purified by sub-boiling distillation (DST-1000 Sub-Boiling Distillation System, Savillex Corporation, United States). Standard calibration solutions were prepared by appropriate dilution of a dissolved amount of NIST 987 certified standard with 2% high-purity nitric acid. Sr isotopic ratios were corrected for mass discrimination using 86Sr/88Sr=0.1194.
6 Results and interpretation
6.1 Water chemistry
According to
TABLE 1
| Sample | CE (µS/cm) | pH | HCO3 (mg/L) | SO4 (mg/L) | Ca (mg/L) | Mg (mg/L) | Na (mg/L) | K (mg/L) | Cl (mg/L) | Sr (mg/L) | B (mg/L) | F (mg/L) | Br (mg/L) | Li (mg/L) | δ13C VPDB | δ2H SMOW | δ18O SMOW | 87/86 Sr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hillshade spring (HS) | 12,580 | 7.4 | 348 | 1787 | 428 | 106 | 1583 | 124 | 2447 | 31.9 | 3.85 | 1.78 | 6.19 | 12.9 | 3.73 | −51.95 | −8.10 | 0.7131 |
| Cave spring (CS) | 10,170 | 7.67 | 464 | 1326 | 460 | 102 | 1168 | 104 | 1760 | 24.9 | 2.84 | 1.38 | 4.85 | 9.6 | 9.14 | −45.75 | −9.35 | 0.7149 |
Chemistry of the current water springs in Carraclaca site.
FIGURE 12

Plot of 87Sr/86Sr ratios for sampled carbonates (white bars), water springs (striped bars), cave materials (grey bars) and Miocene deposits (black bars).
6.2 Carbon and oxygen stable isotope composition and paleofluid temperatures
To define the isotopic composition of the Carraclaca travertine, stable carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) isotope analysis on 27 samples was carried out. Sample locations are shown in Figure 3. All results are reported in Figure 13 and Table 2. The δ13C values range from +4.63 to +18.14‰ V-PDB, whereas δ18O values range from—6.52 to—1.08‰ V-PDB.
FIGURE 13

δ13C (‰, VPDB) and δ18O (‰, VPDB) isotope values diagram obtained for the carbonates samples in Carraclaca site. We can observe a difference in the samples distribution, with those represented by triangles having an enrichment in both isotopes, especially for the oxygen, with respect to those represented by dots.
TABLE 2
| Sample | Latitude | Longitude | Rock type | δ13C VPDB | δ18O VPDB | δ18O SMOW | T1 calculated (°C) | T2 calculated (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 37°42′18.45″N | 1°39′7.78″W | Travitufa | 12.18 | −2.31 | 28.53162 | 7.9 ± 0.5 | - 2.4 ± 0.5 |
| S2 | 37°42′18.47″N | 1°39′7.75″W | Travitufa | 10.93 | −1.37 | 29.49764 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | - 6 ± 0.8 |
| S3 | 37°42′18.47″N | 1°39′7.80″W | Bedded travertine | 7.92 | −3.87 | 26.92116 | 14.4 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.2 |
| S4 | 37°42′18.39″N | 1°39′7.83″W | Travitufa | 11.48 | −1.08 | 29.80128 | 3 ± 0.9 | - 7 ± 0.9 |
| S5a | 37°42′16.50″N | 1°39′11.39″W | Banded travertine | 7.80 | −4.91 | 25.8487 | 18.9 ± 0.7 | 7.8 ± 0.7 |
| S5b | 37°42′16.50″N | 1°39′11.39″W | Banded travertine | 5.16 | −5.62 | 25.1167 | 22.1 ± 1 | 10.7 ± 1 |
| S5c | 37°42′16.50″N | 1°39′11.39″W | Banded travertine | 6.65 | −4.84 | 25.91626 | 18.6 ± 0.6 | 7.5 ± 0.6 |
| S6 | 37°42′16.45″N | 1°39′10.43″W | Bedded travertine | 7.62 | −4.45 | 26.31736 | 16.9 ± 0.4 | 5.9 ± 0.4 |
| S7a | 37°42′21.46″N | 1°39′8.49″W | Banded travertine | 6.61 | −5.13 | 25.62654 | 19.9 ± 0.8 | 8.6 ± 0.8 |
| S7b | 37°42′21.46″N | 1°39′8.49″W | Banded travertine | 6.52 | −5.20 | 25.5499 | 20.2 ± 0.8 | 8.9 ± 0.8 |
| S8a | 37°42′21.46″N | 1°39′8.49″W | Bedded travertine | 6.57 | −4.89 | 25.87288 | 18.8 ± 0.6 | 7.7 ± 0.6 |
| S8b1 | 37°42′21.46″N | 1°39′8.49″W | Bedded travertine | 6.56 | −5.38 | 25.36448 | 21 ± 0.9 | 9.7 ± 0.9 |
| S8b2 | 37°42′21.46″N | 1°39′8.49″W | Bedded travertine | 6.67 | −5.15 | 25.60006 | 20 ± 0.8 | 8.7 ± 0.8 |
| S8b3 | 37°42′21.46″N | 1°39′8.49″W | Bedded travertine | 6.87 | −5.16 | 25.59168 | 20 ± 0.8 | 8.8 ± 0.8 |
| S9 | 37°42′21.47″N | 1°39′9.41″W | Travitufa | 7.61 | −1.42 | 29.44575 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | - 5.8 ± 0.8 |
| S10 | 37°42′21.49″N | 1°39′9.30″W | Travitufa | 18.14 | −1.44 | 29.42976 | 4.4 ± 0.8 | - 5.7 ± 0.8 |
| S11 | 37°42′22.87″N | 1°39′9.56″W | Bedded travertine | 9.89 | −4.11 | 26.67798 | 15.4 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.3 |
| S12 | 37°42′23.18″N | 1°39′5.54″W | Bedded travertine | 12.94 | −4.11 | 26.67006 | 15.4 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.3 |
| S13 | 37°42′18.75″N | 1°39′17.20″W | Bedded travertine | 6.28 | −6.52 | 24.18458 | 26.2 ± 1.4 | 14.5 ± 1.4 |
| S14 | 37°42′18.75″N | 1°39′17.20″W | Bedded travertine | 4.63 | −6.28 | 24.43624 | 25.1 ± 1.3 | 13.4 ± 1.3 |
| S15 | 37°42′17.89″N | 1°39′20.02″W | Bedded travertine | 7.68 | −5.43 | 25.30732 | 21.2 ± 0.9 | 9.9 ± 0.9 |
| S16 | 37°42′17.89″N | 1°39′20.02″W | Bedded travertine | 7.38 | −5.07 | 25.68435 | 19.6 ± 0.7 | 8.4 ± 0.7 |
| S17 | 37°42′18″N | 1°39′19.66″W | Bedded travertine | 5.71 | −5.66 | 25.07607 | 22.2 ± 1 | 10.8 ± 1 |
| S18a | 37°42′16.81″N | 1°39′20.15″W | Bedded travertine | 7.46 | −3.97 | 26.81594 | 14.8 ± 0.2 | 4 ± 0.2 |
| S18b | 37°42′16.81″N | 1°39′20.15″W | Bedded travertine | 7.29 | −4.25 | 26.52746 | 16 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.4 |
| S19 | 37°42′15.50″N | 1°39′11.71″W | Banded travertine | 7.20 | −4.61 | 26.16123 | 17.6 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 0.5 |
| S20 | 37°42′15.61″N | 1°39′11.65″W | Bedded travertine | 11.04 | −5.11 | 25.64611 | 19.8 ± 0.7 | 8.6 ± 0.7 |
δ18O and δ13C isotopic composition and paleotemperatures of Carracalaca site samples.
δ13C values in Carraclaca samples are remarkably positive due to the presence of CO2 released by magmatic activity in deep areas (
The carbon and oxygen stable isotopic signals of Carraclaca samples show two clusters of points (Figure 13). There is a significant statistical difference between the two groups (Supplementary Appendix S1), with one having an enrichment in both isotopes with respect to the other. The difference is mainly in the δ18O values, with delta units ranging between—1.08 and—2.31‰, and—3.87‰ and—6.52‰ V-PDB, respectively. These results indicate a gap between these two types of deposits. This difference may be due to diagenesis processes after deposition or due to the influence of surface water during carbonate precipitation. Martín-García et al. (2002) showed that diagenesis can increase oxygen isotope enrichment due to secondary calcite formation and micritization. Looking at the spatial distribution of the samples, we can identify those with the highest oxygen enrichment as the ones farthest away from the water sources. Considering this, along with the morphology of the deposits studied and the analysis of SEM image and think sections, we are inclined to think that no significant diagenesis processes are present in Carraclaca. Therefore, we argue that the δ18O enrichment in some travertine deposits was likely due to precipitation waters of diverse sources and temperature changes during deposition. This process has erased the original isotopic signature of the. We explain the δ13C enrichment due to a large CO2 degassing process before the precipitation of the material.
If we consider the distribution of carbonates samples in the Carraclaca area compared to other materials (Figure 3; Table 2), we can also observe variations in δ18O signals. Those deposits found on the old Quaternary glacis have a much more enriched oxygen signal than the rest of the travertine, especially compared to those found on yellow and blue Miocene marls. We have made a statistical analysis to corroborate this observation (Supplementary Appendix S1), and we can see a significant statistical difference between these two groups precipitated on Quaternary materials in terms of δ18O signal and carbonates precipitated on other materials. The reason for this δ18O enrichment may be similar to the one we have provided above to explain the oxygen enrichment with source distance. That means that oxygen enrichment may be due to the influence of meteoric water that flows in a specific area, in this case, through Quaternary materials.
As we have already mentioned, it is possible to calculate the temperatures of the fluids that have generated the carbonates through the oxygen isotopes. This technique, called isotope palaeothermometry, employs equations where the fractionation of equilibrium isotopes during the precipitation of the carbonates is assumed (
The palaeotemperatures are supported by the values of δ18O calcite and δ18O water. However, the δ18O water is unknown in the case of fossil travertine deposits, so it must be inferred. That can involve deviations up to 9°C, according to
In the first scenario, it is assumed that the composition of the oxygen isotopes of the travertine parental water is close to that of the currently active Lorca spring. Calculated paleotemperatures posted in Table 2_T1 range between 3°C and 26.2°C. In the second scenario, we assume a parent water δ18O value similar to that of the Carraclaca active spring. Hence, calculated paleotemperatures range between a - 7°C and 14.5°C (Table 2_T2), which is about 10°C less on average than the previous range. These temperatures are unrealistic and lead us to think that the current water chemistry at Carraclaca must differ from that which led to the travertine deposits in the area. In addition, it must be noted that groundwater chemistry is unknown and different compositional effects involving isotopic fractionation could occur (
In any case, paleotemperature values indicate an oxygen signature that signifies cool precipitation temperatures, possibly related to the mixing between thermal upwelling and meteoric water. It is also possible that, as in some Turkish travertines (
6.3 Mineralogy
Calcite is the most common mineral in the carbonates of the study zone, as we could verify with XRD analyses of the 27 travertine samples (Table 3). It is infact low-Mg magnesian calcite, with 2% mol MgCO3 in most of the samples, as was established as follows (Supplementary Figure S1). Low-Mg calcite showed a d 104 reflection at 3.04–3.02 Å (
TABLE 3
| Sample | Rock type | Basement deposit | % calcite | Mg-calcite | % Quartz low | % aragonite | % Moscovite | % gypsum | % Chlorite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Travitufa | Quaternary | 95 | id | 1 | 3 | 1 | <1 | <1 |
| S2 | Travitufa | Quaternary | 90 | id | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| S3 | Bedded travertine | Quaternary | 75 | ++ | 24 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S4 | Travitufa | Quaternary | 83 | + | 5 | 8 | 1 | <1 | 2 |
| S5a | Banded travertine | Yellow Marls | 98 | id | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S5b | Banded travertine | Yellow Marls | 94 | ++ | 6 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S5c | Banded travertine | Yellow Marls | 99 | ++ | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S6 | Bedded travertine | Quaternary | 99 | ++ | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S7a | Banded travertine | Conglomerates | 98 | id | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S7b | Banded travertine | Conglomerates | 99 | ++ | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S8a | Bedded travertine | Conglomerates | 99 | + | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S8b1 | Bedded travertine | Conglomerates | 99 | + | <1 | <1 | 1 | <1 | <1 |
| S8b2 | Bedded travertine | Conglomerates | 99 | + | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S8b3 | Bedded travertine | Conglomerates | 99 | + | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S9 | Travitufa | Conglomerates | 98 | ++ | 1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S10 | Travitufa | Conglomerates | 69 | id | 26 | 2 | <1 | 2 | <1 |
| S11 | Bedded travertine | Conglomerates | 98 | ++ | 1 | 1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S12 | Bedded travertine | Conglomerates | 85 | ++ | 7 | 7 | 1 | <1 | <1 |
| S13 | Bedded travertine | Blue Marl | 88 | + | 2 | <1 | 1 | <1 | <1 |
| S14 | Bedded travertine | Blue Marl | 99 | ++ | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S15 | Bedded travertine | Blue Marl | 86 | id | 14 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S16 | Bedded travertine | Blue Marl | 99 | + | <1 | <1 | <1 | 1 | <1 |
| S17 | Bedded travertine | Blue Marl | 96 | + | 3 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S18a | Bedded travertine | Blue Marl | 99 | + | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S18b | Bedded travertine | Blue Marl | 99 | ++ | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S19 | Banded travertine | Yellow Marls | 98 | id | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| S20 | Bedded travertine | Yellow Marls | 99 | + | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
Mineralogical compositions of the Carraclaca site samples based on XRD analyses. ++: >10%. +: 5%–10%. Id: identified.
XRD analyses from the substrate rock samples (L1 to L6 in Table 4) show high variability in composition. Although they all have calcite, quartz, and muscovite, the percentages of each of these minerals are very different for each sample. The rocks show higher amount of detritic minerals than the carbonates analyzed above. That is reasonable if we consider that they are mainly detritic sedimentary rocks. Sample L6 consists mainly of gypsum and contains 10% of muscovite and 6% of dolomite (Table 4). Sample L1 and L5 have a significant amount of clinochlore-like chlorite. The difference is that while the L1 (blue marls) has a large amount of quartz (65%), the L5 (red conglomerates) has a similar concentration of quartz and calcite, which is around 25% (Table 4).
TABLE 4
| Sample | Facies | % calcite | % Quartz low | % Muscovite | % Gypsum | % Hematite | % Goethite | % Halite | % Glauberite | % Cristobalite | % Clinochloride | % Paragonite | % Chlorite | % Ankerite | % Dolomite | % Coelestine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Cave wall covering | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 100 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| L1 | Blue marls | 2 | 64 | 11 | <1 | 2 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 17 | 5 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| L2 | Calcarenite | 45 | 40 | 3 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 8 | 4 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| L3 | Yellow marls | 63 | 22 | 5 | 2 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 4 | <1 | <1 | 4 | <1 | <1 |
| L4 | Marls s.l | 41 | 29 | 5 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 12 | <1 | <1 | 7 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 3 | <1 |
| L5 | Red conglomerate | 27 | 25 | 7 | 3 | 2 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 16 | 2 | <1 | 4 | 9 | <1 |
| L6 | Sandy marls | 4 | 3 | 10 | 75 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 2 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 6 | <1 |
| G1 | Cave wall covering | <1 | 5 | <1 | 87 | <1 | <1 | 1 | 7 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| G2 | Colloid | 81 | 6 | 1 | 12 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| G4A | Cave wall covering | <1 | 2 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 47 | 21 | 15 | 10 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | <1 | 4 |
Mineralogical compositions of the cave deposits and Miocene sediments in Carraclaca site based on XRD analyses.
The x-ray analyses carried out on the materials extracted from the cave indicate materials of very different compositions (Table 4). Sample F1 is entirely goethite. Sample G1 is composed mainly of halite (87%). The colloid that appears floating on the surface of the water source (sample G2) is mainly a calcite aggregate with a limited amount of gypsum. Finally, the sample G4A corresponds to a material that covers the cave walls. It has an intermediate composition between halite and goethite, with a significant percentage (10%–15%) of cristobalite and glauberite (Table 4). These deposits are characteristic salt eflorescences related to capillarity in which salts with different composition, related to the chemistry of circulating solutions, precipitates when water evaporates in open contact to atmosphere at the cave walls.
There are numerous minerals in the study area forming the analyzed materials. However, we can determine that the deposits of Carraclaca are predominantly formed by calcite, precipitated in moderate to high saline aqueous media. Iron oxy-hydroxide minerals deposits form small bands intercalated in crystalline calcite travertine. Their origin could be related to the sporadic circulation of reduced Iron (II) rich fluids coming from Fe (II) reservoirs (as blue marls), which precipitated in contact with an oxidizing meteoric environment. Thus, indicating the alternance of upwelling fluids that flow through different materials at different depths.
6.4 Strontium isotopic ratios and strontium content
As we have previously indicated, when a fluid passes through a rock at depth, it is marked by an isotopic ratio of 87Sr/86Sr, reflecting the geochemistry of that rock. Once the fluid reaches the surface and precipitates in the form of travertine, it is imprinted with the same isotopic strontium composition as the water from which it came. According to
87Sr/86Sr ratios for the Carraclaca samples show very high variability, both in the carbonate materials and in others (Table 5; Figure 12). Values for travertines range from 0.7056 to 0.7123, with a mean of around 0.7093. According to
TABLE 5
| Sample | Facies | 87/86 Sr | Sr (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Travitufa | 0.70958 | 814,4 |
| S2 | Travitufa | 0.71029 | 774,8 |
| S3 | Bedded travertine | 0.71049 | 530,7 |
| S4 | Travitufa | 0.70766 | 947,7 |
| S5a | Banded travertine | 0.71155 | 431,9 |
| S5b | Banded travertine | 0.70782 | 270,6 |
| S5c | Banded travertine | 0.70722 | 187,7 |
| S6 | Bedded travertine | 0.70972 | 482,4 |
| S7a | Banded travertine | 0.70972 | 301,2 |
| S7b | Banded travertine | 0.7086 | 354,2 |
| S8a | Bedded travertine | 0.71225 | 336,7 |
| S8b1 | Bedded travertine | 0.70634 | 139,2 |
| S8b2 | Bedded travertine | 0.70793 | 202,8 |
| S8b3 | Bedded travertine | 0.7083 | 141,3 |
| S9 | Travitufa | 0.71015 | 356,0 |
| S10 | Travitufa | 0.7098 | 915,8 |
| S11 | Bedded travertine | 0.70788 | 391,5 |
| S12 | Bedded travertine | 0.7108 | 717,5 |
| S13 | Bedded travertine | 0.70557 | 152,6 |
| S14 | Bedded travertine | 0.70588 | 132,8 |
| S15 | Bedded travertine | 0.71177 | 450,8 |
| S16 | Bedded travertine | 0.71155 | 508,0 |
| S17 | Bedded travertine | 0.71232 | 293,7 |
| S18a | Bedded travertine | 0.71157 | 196,7 |
| S18b | Bedded travertine | 0.71031 | 252,1 |
| S19 | Banded travertine | 0.712115 | 206,3 |
| S20 | Bedded travertine | 0.71132 | 251,9 |
| F1 | Cave wall covering | 0,71051 | — |
| L1 | Blue marls | 0,71097 | — |
| L2 | Calcarenite | 0,70569 | — |
| L3 | Yellow marls | 0,70637 | — |
| L4 | Marls s.l | 0,71188 | — |
| L5 | Red conglomerate | 0,71923 | — |
| L6 | Sandy marls | 0,70978 | — |
| G1 | Cave wall covering | 0,70494 | — |
| G2 | Colloid | 0,70891 | — |
| G4A | Cave wall covering | 0,71016 | — |
87Sr/86Sr ratios and Sr content of the carbonates, and87Sr/86Sr ratios of the cave deposits and Miocene sediments in Carraclaca site.
Data variability suggests the need for a more detailed study to determine the source of the strontium signal in Carraclaca carbonates.
Regarding the strontium content (Table 5), there is a statistically significant relationship between Sr and δ13C VPDB at the 95% confidence level (p-value <0.05) in the Carraclaca carbonates (Supplementary Appendix S1; Supplementary Figure S2). We can observe that the highest strontium concentrations occur in the oxygen- and carbon-enriched samples (up to 947.7 mg/kg). The high strontium concentrations in these travertines may be related to the interaction between the groundwater from which they are derived, and the Late Tortonian-Messinian evaporites (
7 Discussion
7.1 Tectonic control of the site
Many studies have been carried out on the recent activity of the AMF with the objective of characterising its sismogenic behaviour, slip rate, major earthquake recurrence time, maximum magnitude, etc. (e.g.
The great majority of travertines associated with active faults are related to normal faults or extensional sectors of strike-slip and oblique-slip faults (
As we have already mentioned, the AMF is a sinistral strike-slip fault with a reverse component that generates the kilometer-scale asymmetric fold that forms the Sierra de la Tercia Range (Figure 1) (
Therfore, the study area represents a rare case of a travertine system in a transpressive area. The compressional component of the strain regime, active in the Lorca-Totana section of the AMF (corroborated by the focal mechanism of the Mw 5.2, 2011 Lorca earthquake (Figure 1B)), does not promote vertical permeability. Furthermore, according to the classic fault-valve model of
7.2 Hydrothermal circulation and travertine formation
As we mention above, the Carraclaca travertines arise in connection with the pop-up structure generated by the activity of the northern branch of the Lorca-Totana section of the AMF. The faults here have a transpressive component that creates a double monocline affecting recent deposits. The spatial relationship between recently active faults and the distribution of travertine deposits in our study area suggests that the deep CO2-laden water that rises to the surface moves along these active structures. The complexity of the fault zone structure allows the existence of several thermal springs at different positions (Figure 2). In Carraclaca, we have found two different depositional morphologies (fissure ridges and cascades) and one sedimentary structure (minidams) along the fault trace. Among these morphologies, the Carraclaca travertines occur in four lithotypes: crystalline crust; fine-grained lithoclast; paper-thin raft; and reed. The distribution of the different travertine samples in the study area shows that those with reed and fine-grained lithoclast lithotypes are located farther away from the water sources. These are materials characterized by smaller calcite crystal size and higher porosity (Figures 8, 10). In contrast, the travertines closest to the springs are crystalline crust and paper-thin raft travertines, with low porosity, laminar structure, and higher crystalline growth (Figures 7, 9). Taking into account the textural differences within our samples, we could discriminate in Carraclaca between travertines and tufas in the sense that Rodríguez-Berriguete and Alonso-Zarza (2019) and Teboul et al. (2016) do. Thus, travertines would be the crystalline and less porous textured deposits, related to abiotic processes and characterized by high depositional rates, while tufas would have a micritic aspect, related to biotic processes with abundant plant-like facies, highly porous, and typified by low depositional rates.
A possible hypothesis to explain the Carraclaca travertine features would be as follows: water rises along faults transporting carbonates in solution to the surface. Once the water sheet emerges through different fissures, it flows down the slope causing the travertine precipitation in the crystalline crustal and paper-thin raft lithotypes in the areas closest to the upwellings. Further away, associated with cascade-type morphologies, carbonate precipitation occurs in reed lithotypes, with more interaction with vegetation.
As a second stage, rockfall events due to earthquakes would produce fine-grained lithoclasts. The shaking would cause the pre-existing travertine deposits to break up and accumulate in some slope areas. The loose clasts would quickly lithify due to the flow of water promoted by the earthquake, generating fine-grained lithoclast travertines. However, there may be alternative explanations for these travertine formations, such as aseismic landslides promoted by large floods.
To determine the evolution and relationship of the Carraclaca travertines to fault activity, the age of each type of deposit would need to be known. The minimum age of tectonic activity on a fault can be established by its relationship to travertine deposits. In addition, it would be possible approximate paleoseismic events of the AMF. For this purpose, the banded travertine will be of great interest, since it is closely related to the seismic activity in the area, possibly resulting from the ascent of fluids along fractures caused by earthquakes. The episodic thin Mn-oxyde rims separate different crystal size aggregates of the calcite rims and can be also representative of different events of water rise and carbonate deposition related to seismic activity. It will be important to make in the future detailed studies of isotopic signatures and to measure subtle changes, for instance in the Sr and Mg contents in calcite, within the consecutive carbonate rims. If signature gradients are detected, this will aid to confirm the existence of dynamic water mixing regimes and also deep evaporation processes related to hydrothermal origin fluids, affecting the 13C enrichment in the surface precipitated carbonates.
Although calcite is the main mineral found in all Carraclaca samples, generally with low Mg contents, aragonite is also present. The results of our carbon and oxygen isotope analyses support at least in part the idea that the Carraclaca deposits have a deep-derived carbon source. However, the study reveals more positive values of δ13C than usual for thermogene travertines, probably due to CO2 degassing downstream. In addition, values indicate formation temperatures around 20°C. That temperature is consistent with non-thermal water precipitation or water-cooled in its flow to the surface. That is the case in current spring water analyses, where δD and δ18O values indicate a meteoric origin and the δ13C values indicate a contribution of magmatic CO2. However, it is especially evident in the tufa deposits found in the study area. These deposits, in spite of presenting very positive δ13C signatures (which would indicate a hydrothermal origin), also have highly enriched δ18O values, indicating low precipitation temperatures. Therefore, they should be considered thermogenic travertines from a geochemical standpoint. However, the properties and dispositions of the facies are better suited to the term tufa (
7.3 Synoptic preliminary model
Based on the tectonic setting and the carbon and oxygen isotope results, we have created a model in order to explain the travertine and tufa formation in Carraclaca (Figure 14). In several works (
FIGURE 14

Schematic synoptic model of the hydrologic system that fed the development of the Carraclaca travertines. Endogenous water rises along the AMF (black arrows) and mixes with meteoric water percolating into the ground (blue arrows). Red arrows indicate current fault movement.
Considering the results of the 87Sr/86Sr ratios analysis, we can deduce that the fluid ascent paths produced by the fault are complex, undoubtedly induced by the structural complexity of the fault zone. It is possible that after each tectonic episode (earthquake rupture), new fault paths open in the area, being sealed afterward, leaving a characteristic strontium isotopic imprint in the precipitated travertine.
The AMF has been a high-angle transpressive structure since the late Miocene (
Large earthquakes with shallow rupture along this fault section would generate large permeability changes (
8 Conclusion
The Plio-Quaternary carbonate deposits of the Carraclaca site reflect the interaction between hydrothermalism, active tectonics, and meteoric water in a region characterized by moderate seismicity. In the study area, travertine precipitation occurred along the faults that form a pop-up structure related to the transpressive nature of the AMF, which accommodates most of the deformation in the single shear component in the Lorca-Totana section. The travertine deposits studied have had different precipitation environments, resulting in two morphotypes; fissure ridge travertine and cascades, as well as four lithotypes; crystalline crust travertine, fine-grained travertine, paper-thin rafts travertine, and reed travertine. Differences in the activity and structure of the fault zone are responsible for the diverse types of morphologies and lithofacies found in Carraclaca.
Current spring water found in the study area has deep flow paths based on its carbon, oxygen, and deuterium signatures, consistent with the isotopic analysis of the Carraclaca travertines and tufas. In order to explain the origin of the fluids that give rise to the carbonates, we have proposed a model in which meteoric water mixes deeply with endogenous CO2-rich fluids. The resulting flow uses the structure of the Alhama de Murcia Fault as a pathway to the surface. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios obtained for the travertine show the necessary interaction between the subsurface water, the Miocene basin sediments, and the radiogenic rocks of the basements, such as those of the Alpujárride units.
The transpressive regime of the AMF is not favorable for the development of travertine deposits since this fault has a higher permeability seal. Even so, we have established that the Carraclaca deposits are related to fault activity. That makes Carraclaca travertines especially interesting for analyzing the relationship between travertine characteristics and transient permeability variations that are tectonically induced.
The association of travertine with the activity of a main tectonic structure within the eastern Betic rangeis of great interest for the seismic hazard assessment and justifies further exploration of deposits through the study of its age and the paleoseismic record.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
CC and JM conceived the study, carried out the mapping and took the field samples. JR and AG performed the chemical analysis. CC wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to final version of the manuscript, including figure completion.
Funding
This research was funded by the Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Investigación (MINECO) project QUAKESTEP (CGL 2017-83931-C3-1-P) and Fundación Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (FUAM)-447820036-(L) Arcilla para el control medioambiental research line.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1060363/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Alonso-HenarJ.Herrero BarberoP.Martínez-DíazJ. J.Álvarez-GómezJ. A.Canora CatalánC.Ínsua ArévaloJ. M. (2018). “Tasas de acortamiento locales en el afloramiento de los Baños de Carraclaca. Segmento Lorca-Totana de la Falla de Alhama de Murcia,” in Tercera reunión ibérica sobre fallas activas y paleosismología. Editors CanoraC.MartínF.MasanaE.PérezR.OrtuñoM. (Alicante (España), 95–98.
2
AltunelE.HancockP. L. (1993a). Morphology and structural setting of quaternary travertines at pamukkale, Turkey. Geol. J.28, 335–346. 10.1002/gj.3350280312
3
AltunelE.HancockP. L. (1993b). “Active fissuring, faulting and travertine deposition at Pamukkale, Western Turkey,” in Neotectonics and active faulting. Editors StewartI. S.Vita-FinziC.OwenL. A. (kyoto, Japan: Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie), 285–302.
4
AlvarezF.AldayaF.Navarro-ViláF. (1989). Miocene extensional deformation in the region of aguilas–mazarrón (eastern betic cordillera). Estud. Geol.45, 369–374.
5
AndrewsJ. E. (2006). Palaeoclimatic records from stable isotopes in riverine tufas: Synthesis and review. Earth-Science Rev.75, 85–104. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.08.002
6
Arenas-AbadC.Vázquez-UrbezM.Pardo-TirapuG.Sancho-MarcénC. (2010). Fluvial and associated carbonate deposits. Dev. Sedimentology61, 133–175.
7
ArgusD. F.GordonR. G.DeMetsC.SteinS. (1989). Closure of the africa-eurasia-north America plate motion circuit and tectonics of the gloria fault. J. Geophys. Res.94, 5585–5602. 10.1029/jb094ib05p05585
8
ArmijoR. (1977). La zona des failles Lorca–Totana (Cordillères Bétiques, Espagne). In Etude tectonique et neotectonique, Thèse Illème cycle. Paris: Univ. Paris VII.
9
AscioneA.IannaceA.ImbrialeP.SantangeloN.SantoA. (2013). Tufa and travertines of southern Italy: Deep-seated, fault-related CO2 as the key control in precipitation. Terra nova.26, 1–13. 10.1111/ter.12059
10
BalanyáJ. C.García-DueñasV. (1987). Les directions structurales dans le Domaine d’Alboran de part de d’autre du détroit de Gibraltar. Compte Rendu Acad. Sci. Paris304, 929–933.
11
Booth-ReaG.AzañónJ. M.Garcı́a-DueñasV. C. (2004). Extensional tectonics in the northeastern Betics (SE Spain): Case study of extension in a multilayered upper crust with contrasting rheologies. J. Struct. Geol.26, 2039–2058. 10.1016/j.jsg.2004.04.005
12
Booth-ReaG.GiaconiaF.Martínez-MartínezJ. M. (2012). The Almenara detachment (southeastern Betics). Geotemas16, 1615–1618.
13
Booth-ReaG.RaneroC. R.Martínez-MartínezJ. M.GrevemeyerI. (2007). Crustal types and Tertiary tectonic evolution of the Alborán sea, Western Mediterranean. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems81.
14
BrogiA.AlçiçekC.YalcinerC. C.CapezzuoliE.LiottaD.MeccheriM.et al (2016). Hydrothermal fluids circulation and travertine deposition in an active tectonic setting: Insights from the kamara geothermal area (Western anatolia, Turkey). Tectonophysics680, 211–232. 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.05.003
15
BrogiA.CapezzuoliE.BuracchiE.BrancaM. (2012). Tectonic control on travertine and calcareous tufa deposition in a low-temperature geothermal system (Sarteano, Central Italy). J. Geol. Soc.169, 461–476. 10.1144/0016-76492011-137
16
BrogiA.CapezzuoliE.MartiniI.PicozziM.SandrelliF. (2014). Late quaternary tectonics in the inner northern apennines (siena basin, southern tuscany, Italy) and their seismotectonic implication. J. Geodyn.76, 25–45. 10.1016/j.jog.2014.03.001
17
BrogiA.CapezzuoliE. (2009). Travertine deposition and faulting: the fault-Related travertine fissure ridge at terme S. Giovanni, rapolano terme (Italy). Int. J. Earth Sci.98, 931–947. 10.1007/s00531-007-0290-z
18
BurtonE. A.WalterL. M. (1987). Temperature or carbonate ion control? Relative precipitation rates of aragonite and Mg calcite from seawater. Geology15, 111–114. 10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<111:rproaa>2.0.co;2
19
CamueraJ.Alonso-ZarzaA. M.Rodríguez-BerrigueteA.Rodríguez-GonzálezA. (2014). Origin and palaeo-environmental significance of the berrazales carbonate spring deposit, north of gran canaria island, Spain. Sediment. Geol.308, 32–43. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2014.04.005
20
CapezzuoliE.GandinA.PedleyM. (2014). Decoding tufa and travertine (fresh water carbonates) in the sedimentary record: The state of the art. Sedimentology61, 1–21. 10.1111/sed.12075
21
CaracausiA.SulliA. (2019). Outgassing of mantle volatiles in compressional tectonic regime away from volcanism: The role of continental delamination. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems20, 2007–2020. 10.1029/2018gc008046
22
CerónJ. C.Pulido BoschA.Sanz de GaldeanoC. (1998). Isotopic identification of CO2 from a deep origin in thermomineral waters of southeastern Spain. Chem. Geol.149, 251–258. 10.1016/s0009-2541(98)00045-x
23
ColakE. S.ÖzkulM.AksoyE.KeleS.GalhebB. (2015). Travertine occurrences along major strike-slip fault zones: Structural, depositional and geochemical constraints from the Eastern Anatolian Fault System (EAFS), Turkey. Geodin. Acta27, 154–173.
24
ÇolakS.AksoyE.KoçyiğitA.İnceözM. (2012). The palu-uluova strike-slip basin in the east anatolian fault system, Turkey: Its transition from the palaeotectonic to neotectonic stage. Turkish J. Earth Sci.21, 547–570. 10.3906/yer-1002-14
25
CraigH. (1961). Standard for reporting concentrations of deuterium and oxygen-18 in natural waters. Science133, 1833–1834. 10.1126/science.133.3467.1833
26
CrosseyL. J.FischerT. P.PatchettP. J.KarlstromK. E.HiltonD. R.NewellD. L.et al (2006). Dissected hydrologic system at the Grand Canyon; interaction between deeply derived fluids and plateau aquiferwaters in modern springs and travertine. Geology34, 25–28. 10.1130/g22057.1
27
CurewitzD.KarsonJ. A. (1997). Structural settings of hydrothermal outflow: Fracture permeability maintained by fault propagation and interaction. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.79, 149–168. 10.1016/s0377-0273(97)00027-9
28
De FilippisL.FaccennaC.BilliA.AnzaloneE.BrilliM.SoligoM.et al (2013). Plateau versus fissure ridge travertines from Quaternary geothermal springs of Italy and Turkey: Interactions and feedbacks between fluid discharge, paleoclimate, and tectonics. Earth-Science Rev.123, 35–52. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.004
29
De LarouziéreF. D.BolzeJ.BordetP.HernándezJ.MontenatC.Ott d’EstevouP. (1988). The Betic segment of the lithospheric Trans-Alboran shear zone during the Late Miocene. Tectonophysics152, 41–52. 10.1016/0040-1951(88)90028-5
30
De PinhoR.Rodríguez-BerrigueteA.Alonso-ZarzaA.CabreraM. (2015). The temisas carbonate building: An example of thermogene tufa system in gran canaria island. Geogaceta57, 7–10.
31
DugaminE. J. M.RichardA.CathelineauM.BoironM. C.DespinoisF.BrissetA. (2021). Groundwater in sedimentary basins as potential lithium resource: A global prospective study. Sci. Rep.11, 21091. 10.1038/s41598-021-99912-7
32
EcheverriaA.KhazaradzeG.AsensioE.GarateJ.Martín-DávilaJ.SuriñachE. (2013). Crustal deformation in eastern Betics from CuaTeNeo GPS network. Tectonophysics608, 600–612. 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.08.020
33
FaccennaC.FunicielloR.MontoneP.ParottoM.VoltaggioM. (1993). Late Pleistocene strike slip tectonics in the acque albule basin (tivoli, latium). Mem. Descr. della Carta Geol. d’Italia69, 37–50.
34
FaccennaC.PiromalloC.Crespo-BlancA.JolivetL.RossettiF. (2004). Lateral slab deformation and the origin of the Western Mediterranean arcs. Tectonics23, 1–25. 10.1029/2002tc001488
35
FaccennaC.SoligoM.BilliA.De FilippisL.FunicielloR.RossettiC.et al (2008). Late Pleistocene depositional cycles of the Lapis Tiburtinus travertine (Tivoli, Central Italy): Possible influence of climate and fault activity. Glob. Planet. Change63, 299–308. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.06.006
36
FahadM.SaeedS. (2018). Determination and estimation of magnesium content in the single phase magnesium-calcite [Ca(1-x)MgxCO3(s)] using electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Geosciences J.22, 303–312. 10.1007/s12303-017-0059-8
37
FernandesR. M. S.MirandaJ. M.MeijningerB. M. L.BosM. S.NoomenR.BastosL.et al (2007). Surface velocity field of the Ibero-Maghrebian segment of the Eurasia-Nubia plate boundary. Geophys. J. Int.169, 315–324. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03252.x
38
FerraterM.OrtuñoM.MasanaE.PallàsR.PereaH.BaizeS.et al (2016). Refining seismic parameters in low seismicity areas by 3D trenching: The Alhama de Murcia fault, SE Iberia. Tectonophysics680, 122–128. 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.05.020
39
FerraterM.OrtuñoM.TeresaMasanaE.Martínez DíazJ. J.PallasR.PeeaH.et al (2017). Lateral slip rate of Alhama de Murcia fault (SE Iberian Peninsula) based on a morphotectonic analysis: Comparison with paleoseismological data. Quat. Int.451, 87–100. 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.02.018
40
FilizS. (1984). “Investigation of the important geothermal areas by using C, H, O isotopes,” in Seminar on the utilization of geothermal Energy for electric power generation and space heating (Florence, Italy, 14–17.
41
FoukeB. W.FarmerJ. D.Des MaraisD. J.PrattL.SturchioN. C.BurnsP. C.et al (2000). Depositional facies and aqueous-solid geochemistry of travertine depositing hot springs (Angel Terrace, Mammoth Hot Springs, Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A.). J. Sediment. Res.70, 565–585. 10.1306/2dc40929-0e47-11d7-8643000102c1865d
42
FriedmanI. (1970). Some investigations of the deposition of travertine from Hot Springs—I. The isotopic chemistry of a travertine-depositing spring. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta34, 1303–1315. 10.1016/0016-7037(70)90043-8
43
GilliE. (2005). Review on the use of natural cave speleothems as palaeoseismic or neotectonics indicators. Comptes Rendus Geosci.337, 1208–1215. 10.1016/j.crte.2005.05.008
44
GiwellA.EstebanL.Delle PianeC.ClennellM. B. (2016). Fault reactivation in travertine and its impact on hydraulic transmissibility: laboratory experiments and mesoscale structures. Pet. Geosci.23, 92–103. 10.1144/petgeo2016-025
45
Gómez-NovellO. (2021). Paleoseismic transect across the Alhama de Murcia Fault and implications of a fault-based seismic hazard assessment for the Eastern Betics. 10.13140/RG.2.2.28807.11685/2
46
GradzińskiM.WroblewskiW.DulinskiM.HercmanH. (2014). Earthquake-affected development of a travertine ridge. Sedimentology61, 238–263. 10.1111/sed.12086
47
HancockP. L.ChalmersR. M. L.AltunelE.ÇakırZ. (1999). Travitonics: using travertines in active fault studies. J. Struct. Geol.21, 903–916. 10.1016/s0191-8141(99)00061-9
48
Herrero BarberoP.Álvarez GómezJ. A.Martínez DíazJ. J. (2017). Análisis estructural en el segmento Alhama de Murcia – Alcantarilla (Falla de Alhama de Murcia) y sus implicaciones en la peligrosidad sísmica. Geogaceta62, 11–14.
49
Herrero BarberoP.Álvarez GómezJ. A.Martínez DíazJ. J.KlimowitzJ. (2020). Neogene basin inversion and recent slip rate distribution of the northern termination of the Alhama de Murcia Fault (Eastern Betic Shear Zone, SE Spain). Tectonics39. 10.1029/2019TC005750
50
KeleS.BreitenbachS. F. M.CapezzuoliE.Nele MecklerA.ZieglerM.MillanI. M.et al (2015). Temperature dependence of oxygenand clumped isotope fractionation in carbonates: a study of travertines and tufas in the 6–95°C temperature range. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta168, 172–192. 10.1016/j.gca.2015.06.032
51
KeleS.OzkulM.GokgozA.ForizsI.BaykaraM. O.AlcicekM. C.et al (2011). Stable isotope geochemical study of Pamukkale travertines: New evidences of low-temperature non-equilibrium calcite-water fractionation. Sediment. Geol.238, 191–212. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2011.04.015
52
LonerganL.SchreiberB. C. (1993). Proximal deposits at a fault-controlled basin margin, Upper Miocene, SE Spain. J. Geol. Soc. Lond.150, 719–727. 10.1144/gsjgs.150.4.0719
53
LonerganL.WhiteN. (1997). Origin of the Betic-Rif mountain belt. Tectonics16, 504–522. 10.1029/96tc03937
54
MaloneM. J.BakerP. (1999). Temperature dependence of the strontium distribution coefficient in calcite: An experimental study from 40ºc to 200ºc and application to Natural diagenetic calcites. J. Sediment. Res.69, 216–223. 10.2110/jsr.69.216
55
ManfraL.MasiU.TuriB. (1974). Effetti isotopici nella diagenesi dei travertini. Geol. Romana13, 147–155.
56
MartíA.QueraltP.LedoJ. J.MarcuelloA.Álvarez-AramberriJ.Martínez-DíazJ. J. (2016). “Magnetotelluric characterization of the Alhama de Murcia Fault (Eastern Betics): Preliminary results,” in Proceedings, near surface geoscience-22nd European meeting of environmental and engineering Geophysics (Barcelona, Spain–29500161.
57
MartínezM.MorenoL. (2005). Los balnearios olvidados y las salinas de interior de la Región de Murcia: Un patrimonio hidrogeológico a redescubrir y su aplicación a la didáctica geológica. Enseñanza las Ciencias Tierra13 (2), 177–184.
58
Martínez-DíazJ. J.Alonso-HenarJ.Insua-ArévaloJ. M.CanoraC.García-MayordomoJ.Rodríguez-EscuderoE.et al (2018). Geological evidences of surface rupture related to a seventeenth century destructive earthquake in Betic Cordillera (SE Spain): Constraining the seismic hazard of the Alhama de Murcia fault. J. Iber. Geol.45, 73–86. 10.1007/s41513-018-0082-2
59
Martinez-DiazJ. J.Hernández-EnrileJ. (2001). Using travertine deformations to characterize paleoseismic activity along an active oblique-slip fault: The Alhama de Murcia fault (Betic Cordillera, Spain). Acta Geol. hispánica36, 3–4.
60
Martínez-DíazJ. J.MasanaE.Hernández-EnrileJ. L.SantanachP. (2003). Effects of repeated paleoeartquakes on the Alhama de Murcia fault (Betic Cordillera, Spain) on the Quaternary evolution of an alluvial fan system. Ann. Geophys.46, 775–792.
61
Martínez-DíazJ. J.MasanaE.OrtuñoM. (2012). Active tectonics of the Alhama de Murcia fault, Betic Cordillera, Spain. J. Iber. Geol.38, 253–270. 10.5209/rev_jige.2012.v38.n1.39218
62
Martínez-MartínezJ. M.AzañónJ. M. (1997). Mode of extensional tectonics in the southeastern Betics (SE Spain): Implications for the tectonic evolution of the peri-Alborán orogenic system. Tectonics16, 205–225. 10.1029/97tc00157
63
Martı́nez-Dı́azJ. J. (2002). Stress field variation related to fault interaction in a reverse oblique-slip fault: the Alhama deMurcia fault, Betic Cordillera, Spain. Tectonophysics356, 291–305. 10.1016/s0040-1951(02)00400-6
64
MasanaE.Martínez-DíazJ. J.Hernández-EnrileJ. L.SantanachP. (2004). The Alhama de Murcia fault (SE Spain), a seismogenic fault in a diffuse plate boundary. Seismotectonic implications for the Ibero-Magrebian region. J. Geophys. Res.109, 1–17. 10.1029/2002jb002359
65
MasonaJ.SchneiderwindaS.PallikarakisbA.MechernichcS.PapanikolaoubI.ReicherteraK. (2017). Hanging-wall colluvial cementation along active normal faults. Quat. Res.88, 39–59. 10.1017/qua.2017.32
66
MeijningerB. M. L.VissersR. L. M. (2006). Miocene extensional basin development in the Betic Cordillera, SE Spain revealed through analysis of the Alhama de Murcia and Crevillente Faults. Basin Res.18, 547–571. 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2006.00308.x
67
MinissaleA.KerrickD. M.MagroG.MurrellM. T.PaladiniM.RihsS.et al (2002). Geochemistry of Quaternary travertines in the region north of Rome (Italy): structural, hydrologic and paleoclimatic implications. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.203, 709–728. 10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00875-0
68
MontenatC. (1973). Les formations néogènes du Levant espagnol. Ph.D. Thesis. Orsay, France: University of Paris.
69
NewellD. L.CrosseyL. J.KarlstromK.FischerT.HiltonD. (2005). Continental-scale links between the mantle and groundwater systems of the Western United States: Evidence from travertine springs and regional He isotope data. GSA Today15, 4–10. 10.1130/1052-5173(2005)015<4:cslbtm>2.0.co;2
70
OrtuñoM.MasanaE.García-MeléndezE.Martínez-DíazJ. J.ŠtěpančíkováP.CunhaP.et al (2012). An exceptionally long paleoseismic record of a slow-moving fault: the Alhama de Murcia fault (Eastern Betic Shear Zone, Spain). Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.124, 1474–1494. 10.1130/b30558.1
71
ÖzkulM.GökgözA.KeleS.BaykaraM. O.ShenC.-C.ChangY.-W.et al (2014). Sedimentological and geochemical characteristics of a fluvial travertine: A case from the eastern Mediterranean region. Sedimentology61, 291–318. 10.1111/sed.12095
72
ÖzkulM.KeleS.GökgözA.ShenC.JonesB.BaykaraM. O.et al (2013). Comparison of the Quaternary travertine sites in the Denizli extensional basin based on their depositional and geochemical data. Sediment. Geol.294, 179–204. 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.05.018
73
PedleyH. M. (2009). Tufas and travertines of the Mediterranean region: a testing ground for freshwater carbonate concepts and developments. Sedimentology56, 221–246. 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.01012.x
74
PentecostA. (2005). Travertine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 446.
75
Rodrigo-NaharroJ.DelgadoA.HerreroM. J.GranadosA.Pérez del VillarL. (2013). Current Travertines Precipitation from CO2-rich Groundwaters as an alert of CO2 Leakages from a Natural CO2 Storage at Gañuelas-Mazarrón Tertiary Basin (Murcia, Spain). Inf. Técnicos Ciemat1279, 54.
76
Rodríguez-EscuderoE.Martínez-DíazJ. J.Giner-RoblesJ. L.TsigeM.Cuevas-RodríguezJ. (2020). Pulverized quartz clasts in gouge of the Alhama de Murcia fault (Spain): Evidence for coseismic clast pulverization in a matrix deformed by frictional sliding. Geology48, 283–287. 10.1130/g47007.1
77
Rodríguez-FernándezJ.AzorA.AzañonJ. M. (2012). “The Betic intramontane basins (SE Spain): Stratigraphy, subsidence, and tectonic history,” in Tectonics of sedimentary basins. Recent advances. Editors BusbyC.AzorA., 23, 461–479.
78
SanjuanB.GourcerolB.MillotR.RettenmaierD.JeandelE.RombautA. (2022). Lithium-rich geothermal brines in Europe: An up-date about geochemical characteristics and implications for potential Li resources. Geothermics101, 102385. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102385
79
SelimH. H.YavuzO.GürerÖ.KarakaşA.TaşK. (2016). Age determination for segments of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) northern branch by 234U/230Th dating of Soğucak (Yalova) range-front travertines, south Marmara, Turkey. Quat. Int.425, 416–424. 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.035
80
SerpelloniE.VannucciG.PondrelliS.ArgnaniA.CasulaG.AnzideiM.et al (2007). Kinematics of the Western Africa-Eurasia plate boundary from focal mechanisms and GPS data. Geophys. J. Int.169, 1180–1200. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2007.03367.x
81
ShiZ.ShiZ.YincG.LiangJ. (2014). Travertine deposits, deep thermalmetamorphism and tectonic activity in the Longmenshan tectonic region, southwestern China. Tectonophysics633, 156–163. 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.020
82
ShiZ.ShiYinG.LiangJ. (2014). Travertine deposits, deep thermal metamorphism and tectonic activity in the Longmenshan tectonic region, southwestern China. Tectonophysics633, 156–163. 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.020
83
SibsonR. H. (1990). Conditions for fault-valve behavior. Geological Society, 54. London: Special Publications, 15–28.
84
SibsonR. H. (2004). “Frictional mechanics of seismogenic thrust systems in the upper continental crust. Implications for fluid overpressures and redistribution,” in Thrush tectonics and hydrocarbon systems. Editor McClayK. R. (London: AAPG Memoir), 82, 1–17.
85
SibsonR. H. (1996). Structural permeability of fluid-driven fault–fracture meshes. J. Struct. Geol.18, 1031–1042. 10.1016/0191-8141(96)00032-6
86
SilvaP. G. (1994). Evolución geodinámica de la Depresión del Guadalentín desde el Mioceno Superior hasta la actualidad: Neotectónica y Geomorfología (Doctoral Thesis). Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
87
SilvaP. G.GoyJ. L.ZazoC.LarioJ.BardajíT. (1997). Paleoseismic indications along ‘aseismic’ fault segments in the Guadalentin Depression (SE Spain). J. Geodyn.24, 105–115. 10.1016/s0264-3707(97)00011-2
88
SilvaP. G.HarveyA. M.ZazoC.GoyJ. L. (1992). Geomorphology, depositional style and morphometric relationships of Quaternary alluvial fans in the Guadalentín Depression (Murcia, southeast Spain). Z. fur Geomorphol.36, 325–341. 10.1127/zfg/36/1992/325
89
SpötlC.ManginiA.FrankN.EichstädterR.BurnsS. (2002). Start of the last interglacial period at 135 ka: Evidence from a high Alpine speleothem. Geology30, 815–818. 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0815:sotlip>2.0.co;2
90
Stanienda PileckiK. J. (2018). Magnesium calcite in Muschelkalk limestones of the Polish part of the Germanic Basin. Carbonates Evaporites33, 801–821. 10.1007/s13146-018-0437-y
91
TemizU.EikenbergJ. (2011). U/Th dating of the travertine deposited at transfer zone between two normal faults and their neotectonic significance: Cambazli fissure ridge travertines (the Gediz Graben e Turkey). Geodin. Acta24, 95–105.
92
TemizU.GoktenY. E.EikenbergJ. (2013). Strike-slip deformation and U/Th dating of travertine deposition: Examples from North Anatolian Fault Zone, Bolu and Yenicag Basins, Turkey. Quat. Int.312, 132–140. 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.08.034
93
TuriB. (1986). “Stable isotope geochemistry of travertines,” in In handbook of environmental isotope geochemistry. Editors FritzB. P.FontesJ. C. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 207–238.
94
Uysalİ. T.FengY.ZhaoJ.IsikV.NurielP.GoldingS. (2009). Hydrothermal CO2 degassing in seismically active zones during the late Quaternary. Chem. Geol.265, 442–454. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.05.011
95
UysalT.FengY.ZhaoJ. X.AltunelE.WeatherleyD.KarabacakV.et al (2007). U-series dating and geochemical tracing of late Quaternary travertine in co-seismic fissures. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.257, 450–462. 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.03.004
96
VignaroliG.BerardiG.BilliA.KeleS.RossettiF.SoligoM.et al (2016). Tectonics, hydrothermalism, and paleoclimate recorded by Quaternary travertines and their spatio-temporal distribution in the Albegna basin, central Italy: Insights on Tyrrhenian margin neotectonics. Lithosphere8, 335–358. 10.1130/l507.1
97
WangH.YangG.QinJ. M.GuoJ. Q.CaoJ. (2007). Records of Paleoclimate changes based on the Dawanzhangjiagou travertine deposition profile in Huanglong, Sichuan (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Geosci. Sin.28, 469–474.
98
ZentmyerR.MyrowP.NewellD. (2008). Travertine deposits from along the South Tibetan Fault System near Nyalam, Tibet. Geol. Mag.145, 753–765. 10.1017/s0016756808005323
99
ZhangF.XuH.KonishiH.RodenE. E. (2010). A relationship between d104 value and composition in the calcite-disordered dolomite solid-solution series. Am. Mineralogist95, 1650–1656. 10.2138/am.2010.3414
100
ZhouG. T.ZhengY. F. (2006). On the direction and magnitude of oxygen isotope fractionation between calcite and aragonite at thermodynamic equilibrium. Aquat. Geochem.12, 239–268. 10.1007/s10498-005-5857-3
Summary
Keywords
travertine, stable isotopes, paleoseismometer, Alhama de Murcia fault, transpressional fault, geochemistry
Citation
Canora C, Cuevas Rodríguez J, Martínez Díaz JJ and Garralón A (2023) Analysis of a travertine system controlled by the transpressional activity of the Alhama de Murcia fault: The Carraclaca site, eastern Betic Cordillera, Spain. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1060363. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1060363
Received
03 October 2022
Accepted
27 January 2023
Published
09 February 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Germany
Reviewed by
Antonio Caracausi, National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, Italy
Maria Francesca Ferrario, University of Insubria, Italy
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Canora, Cuevas Rodríguez, Martínez Díaz and Garralón.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Carolina Canora, carolina.canora@uam.es
This article was submitted to Structural Geology and Tectonics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.