Abstract
The middle segment of the Xiaojiang fault zone consists of strike-slip faults with frequent strong and medium–strong earthquakes under the joint influence of NE-trending faults and deep structural characteristics. The distribution characteristics of the deep subfaults of each branch need to be revealed. Two short-period dense array survey lines are deployed in the area. Shear wave velocity structures are obtained using ambient noise tomography. The results reveal that the faults in each branch dip nearly eastward, with strike-slip characteristics in the north‒south direction. Strong velocity lateral variation infer imply that the deformation characteristics of the upper crust may be brittle. NE faults are observed, which are characterized by typical compression. The high-velocity zone in the Songming Basin may be related to the deeper upwelling of high-velocity strata in the upper crustal flow.
1 Introduction
The Xiaojiang fault zone (XJFZ), located at the contact between the South China block and the Sichuan Yunnan block, is the southeastern boundary of the Tibetan Plateau (Figure 1B) and an important part of the strong sinistral strike-slip activity of the Tibetan Plateau (; ; ). Since the late Quaternary, the structural deformation and seismicity of the XJFZ have been very active (; ; ). Therefore, the XJFZ is an important part of the north‒south seismic belt in China (; ).
FIGURE 1
The crust in the southeast margin of the Tibetan Plateau rotates clockwise around the eastern Himalayan tectonic knot, which results in a strong stress concentration area along the XJFZ. Based on GPS data (
Many geophysical studies have been carried out in the XJFZ to describe its large scale and deep structural characteristics. The deep geophysical structures show that there are low-velocity (LV) (
The middle section of the XJFZ, located in the area from Dongchuan to Fuxian Lake, is composed of the eastern and western branches. The structural characteristics are extremely complex. Current geological research is mostly based on GPS measurements, surface fault characteristics, etc., Fine underground structure detection must still be carried out to describe the fault and basin distributions. Short-period dense array technology is an important method for detecting underground structures due to its high observation density and convenient acquisition (
Several subfaults and pull-apart basins are located in the middle section of the XJFZ. The seismogenic structures are all related to subfaults. Most of the current research focuses on large-scale deep structures. A better understanding of the deep structural characteristics of the faults and basins in the middle section of the XJFZ is needed. In this paper, using short-period dense array data, we obtained a high-precision S-wave velocity structure. The results reveal the deep characteristics of the subfaults in the middle section of the XJFZ and the basin distribution. We then discussed the relationship between the shallow structural characteristics and the deep geophysical anomalies.
2 Geological setting
The Xiaojiang faults have multiple stages of tectonic movement. Since the middle Pleistocene, the faults have been dominated by left-lateral strike-slip motion (
The middle segment of the XJFZ refers to the section from the Daduo to Yangzonghai Basins and the southern Yiliang Basin, including the eastern and western branch faults and the blocks between them. This section is a typical zone that contains rapid changes in the XJFZ (Figure 1A) (
In this study, we focus mainly on the Songming–Yiliang area (Figure 2), where the main structure is formed by the parallel arrangement of eastern and western branch faults. The western branch faults include the Luliangshan fault (F1), which extends across the Songming Basin, Yanglin–Qiansuo fault (F2) and Fugang–Haifenyuan fault (F3). The eastern branch faults consist of the Yiliang Basin western edge fault (also called the Xiaoxinjie–Yiliang fault, F4), Yiliang–Xujiadu fault (F5), Tangzi–Xiaoxinjie fault (F6), Mopanshan–Fenglecun fault (F7) and Majie–Nanyangjie fault (F8). The Wanshoushan fault (F9), Kuanglanghe–Yaolingshan fault (F10), and Dachunhe–Yiduoyun (F11) fault are NE-trending normal faults in the study area.
FIGURE 2

Structural geological map of the middle section of the XJFZ (Zuo et al., 2018) and the location of the survey lines. The thick red line represents the faults of the XJFZ, and the thin red line represents other subfaults in the area. Black dot represents Stratigraphic unconformity. The faults are modified from previous researchers (
Along the western branch faults in the area (Figure 2), the Songming Basin and Yangzong Basin, which are pull-apart basins controlled by the subfaults, are present. The eastern branch faults are separated by the Yiliang Basin, which is also deformed by the subfaults. The areas between the eastern and western branches are the Kebao Basin and Laohoujie Basin. The main boundary of the Laohoujie Basin is a non-faulted basin. The Kebao Basin is a half-graben faulted basin that developed in the early Pleistocene and is controlled by the XJFZ and Wanshoushan fault (F9).
The structural area contains two large-scale sinistral stepped areas of the eastern and western branch faults: the Songming–Xiaoxinjie and Yangzong–Yiliang areas. The two areas are the main discontinuous areas of the entire XJFZ, which easily form a structural area locked by ruptures (Zhou et al., 2022) with high local stress levels and earthquake risks. The epicenter of the 1,833 Songming M8.0 earthquake is speculated to be in the Songming Basin (
The outcropping strata in the study area are the Cenozoic Nanhua system to the Quaternary system. The strata are divided into eastern and western regions. Generally, the Sinian to Devonian strata in the eastern branch are relatively complete, mainly including the Sinian, Cambrian, Ordovician, Devonian and other strata. The strata outcrop near faults or stratigraphic sedimentary boundaries, which are distributed in a belt shape and are associated with the structure. Carboniferous and Jurassic strata are missing. Quaternary cover is mainly distributed in the Yiliang Basin, with an overall thickness of 358 m. In addition, some strata in South China crop out in the middle of the study area. The outcropping strata of the western branch fault are relatively complex, mainly including the middle and lower Cambrian system, a detected lower system, the Devonian system, the Carboniferous system, the Jurassic system and other strata. The Quaternary deposits are mainly distributed in the Songming Basin, with a total thickness of approximately 800 m.
3 Data and methods
3.1 Data acquisition
In 2020, two short-period dense array survey lines were deployed (Figure 2) in the middle of the XJFZ using Z-land3C node seismometers with a dominant frequency of 5 Hz. The length of the survey line is approximately 50 km, and the interval between stations is approximately 500 m. 72 seismometers are arranged along the southern line (Line 1), and 83 are arranged along the northern line (Line 2). The sampling interval is 2 ms, and the observation period is 29 days. The survey lines cross the eastern and western branches of the middle section of the XJFZ. Line 1 mainly covers the eastern Kunming Basin, Yangzong Basin, Kebao Basin, Yiliang Basin, and western Shilin. Line 2 starts from Baiyi in the west, passes Songming, and reaches Mamingxiang in the east.
The vertical component data of the Z-land3c node seismometer are used for ambient noise tomography (
3.2 Data preprocessing
We first converted the FCNT format of the vertical component of the data into the SAC format. During the conversion, the integrity of the continuous data was checked. The continuous signal of one station is divided into hour-long segments. Then, mean value removal, linear trend attenuation and filtering were performed to eliminate the impact of zero drift and long-period trends in the data on subsequent data processing (
3.3 Cross-correlation function (CCF)
In this paper, the cross-correlation method of ambient noise is used to extract the surface wave empirical Green’s function (EGF) between pairs of stations (
Where N is the number of traces used, is the data of the jth trace. Its instantaneous phases can be obtained using Hilbert transform:
Figure 3 shows that the cross-correlation function of Line 2 recovered well. Benefitting from PWS, the data signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is effectively improved within the station spacing range of 20–35 km. The signals of the negative half-branch signal are obviously stronger than those of the positive half-branch signal. It is speculated that the noise source is mainly from an area to the east of the survey lines.
FIGURE 3

CCFs between station 2001 and other stations in Line 2. (A) CCFs calculated using the liner stack. (B) CCFs calculated using PWS.
We then perform bandpass filtering at 1–6 s 6–8s and 9–15 s. The process effectively improves the SNR (Figure 4). The valid signal is basically within the 1–8 s band (Figures 4A, B). Signals can also be observed at 9–15 s (Figure 4C). Considering that Zland seismometers have a corner frequency of 5 HZ, we abandon the signal at 8–15 s for higher data reliability and more stable picking Therefore, 1–8 s bandpass filtering is applied to both Line 1 and Line 2 in this processing (Figure 5).
FIGURE 4

CCFs between station 2001 and other stations along Line 2. The original CCFs are bandpass-filtered in three bands with different periods: (A) 1–6 s (B) 6–8 s and (C) 9–15 s.
FIGURE 5

Bandpass-filtered CCFs in bands with periods of 1–8 s. (A) CCFs between station 1,001 and other stations along Line 1. (B) CCFs between station 2001 and other stations along Line 2.
3.4 Group velocity dispersion curve extraction
The frequency–time analysis method is performed to extract Rayleigh surface wave dispersion signals from the cross-correlation between stations (Figure 6) (
FIGURE 6

Group velocity dispersion extraction using the image transformation technique. The color bar represents the normalized surface wave envelope amplitude. Gray circles represent dispersion points satisfied with the chosen conditions, and solid red points are the final reserved dispersion points.
FIGURE 7

Group velocity dispersion extraction results. (A,C) are the group velocity dispersion curves extracted from the EGFs in Line 1 and Line 2, respectively. The red solid line denotes the average velocity dispersion curve of all station pairs. The gray solid lines show randomly selected dispersion curves. (B) and (D) are the number of phase velocity dispersion nodes at each period for Line 1 and Line 2.
3.5 S-wave velocity inversion
In this paper, the direct surface wave tomography method (
We used 0.006° as the horizontal grid spacing for Line1 and Line2. According to ambient noise tomography result on the southeast edge of the Tibet Plateau (
4 Results
4.1 Checkerboard tests
The checkerboard test is an effective way to demonstrate the resolution and reliability of inversion results. Because of the linear array deployment in this paper, it is difficult to carry out the standard detection plate test. The array survey line is nearly perpendicular to the structural strike of the XJFZ, and the ray path is less affected by the lateral heterogeneity of the velocity structure. Therefore, the use of surface wave tomography can ensure that the velocity structure below the survey line is effectively constrained. To analyze the horizontal resolution of the linear array in this paper, a strip detection plate (Figures 8A, F) is designed. The strip has a positive north‒south trend that is close to the actual tectonic trend, and the horizontal grid spacing is 0.006°. We generate a real detection plate model by adding 40% of the average velocity to the background velocity model to disturb the positive and negative forms of the structure. The background velocity gradually increases with depth (the gradient is 0.1). The velocity disturbance is generated by a sine function, and all inversion parameters are the same as those of the actual data.
FIGURE 8

Lateral checkerboard resolution tests for Line 1 (A–E) and Line 2 (F–J). (A,F): input checkerboard model, in which the anomaly size is approximately 0.006°. Output models at different depths are as follows: (B,G): 1 km; (C,H): 3 km; (D,I): 6 km; (E,J): 8 km. The small black dot denotes the survey.
Figure 8 b-e and g-j show the recovery results of the checkerboards of Line 1 and Line 2 at depths of 1, 3, 6, and 8 km, respectively. Most of the shallow layers (<=6 km) within the observation range have recovered well. At the edge of the study area and the location of the survey line dislocation (especially between 103.2oE and 103.3oE along Line 2), the recovery results are relatively poor due to the sparse ray coverage. The recovery result of the 8 km depth slice can reflect only the positive and negative trends of velocity, and the form of the specific velocity disturbance cannot be completely recovered. The recovery quality of the checkerboard at each depth shows a trend of decreasing gradually with increasing depth, but the overall recovery is shown by quality data. The shallow area of 6 km is an area of reliable data, indicating that the imaging results are reliable.
4.2 Shear wave velocity
S-wave velocity inversion is carried out for Line 1 and Line 2 to obtain the velocity profile. We intercept the shallow area of 6 km because it is the reliable inversion area and discuss the velocity structure below the profile.
The inversion results (Figures 9, 10) show that the S-wave velocity values in the study area are in the range of 2–3.6 km/s. The velocity distribution corresponds with the elevation. Mountains with large overall elevations have higher velocities, while basins have lower velocities. In terms of longitudinal characteristics, the LV of the velocity profile is generally approximately 2 km/s, corresponding to the Quaternary overburden (Figure 3) and shallow weathered layers. Generally, the LV layer of Line 1 is thicker than that of Line 2 and corresponds more to the distribution of the basin. The inversion results below a depth of 5 km are generally above 3.0 km/s, which corresponds well with the larger regional inversion results (Zheng et al., 2016;
FIGURE 9

Group velocity imaging result of Line 1. (A) Simplified geological map. (B) Altitude profile. (C) S-wave inversion profile.
FIGURE 10

S-wave velocity imaging result of Line 2. (A) Simplified geological map. (B) Altitude profile. (C) S-wave inversion profile. The shadow rectangle indicate unreliable results.
Various low-velocity areas can be observed in the Line 1 and Line 2 profiles, which are consistent with the basins. The main basins in the area include the Songming Basin, Yiliang Basin, Yangzong Basin, etc. The inversion results show that the thickness of the sedimentary layer is consistent with that of the sedimentary basins in the study area (
5 Discussion
5.1 Faults in the middle segment of the XJFZ
In the middle section of the XJFZ, the direction of the rhombic Sichuan–Yunnan block movement is from SSE to S (
We obtained the S-wave velocity structure in this area, in which the LV anomaly corresponds well with the eastern and western branch secondary faults in the middle section of the XJFZ and the NE- and NNE-trending subfaults (Figures 11, 12). A comparison of the velocity structures of Line 1 and Line 2 reveals that Line 1 spans multiple secondary faults and multiple basins, and the lateral velocity changes are generally more intense. The LV and HV areas are relatively obvious, indicating that the area has undergone a strong tectonic deformation process. The Songming–Yiliang area is a section where the XJFZ has been divided from two to many branches (
FIGURE 11

Interpreted results based on the S-wave velocity structure of Line 1. The black solid lines denote the faults. The thick black dotted lines denote the predicted faults. The thin black dotted lines denote inferred small faults in basins.
FIGURE 12

Interpreted results based on the S-wave velocity structure of Line 2. The black solid lines denote the faults. The thick black dotted lines denote the predicted faults. The thin black dotted lines denote inferred all faults in basins.
The velocity corresponding to the subfaults (F1∼F8) of the XJFZ is relatively low, i.e., generally 2 km/s, indicating that a strong compression fracture zone along the fault was formed in the process of left-lateral strike slip. At the same time, the LV areas usually show nearly vertical dips with a slightly eastward tilt. The fault dip direction is consistent with the tectonic stress direction in the area. The results illustrate that the depth of the secondary faults of the XJFZ extends to 6 km. According to deeper imaging studies, the eastern‒western branch converges at a depth of approximately 25 km and cuts through the whole crust (
The NE-trending faults (F10 and F9 in Figure 12) that are sandwiched by the XJFZ in the study area are cut off morphologically by the subfaults. The corresponding S-wave velocities are low (2.4–2.8 km/s), but the lateral velocity structure shows obvious compressional characteristics, such as LV inversion under F9 (103.2E in Figure 12) and obvious lateral fluctuation at the F10 fault (103.15E in Figure 12). Tectonically and geomorphologically, Yaoling Mountain has clear sinistral strike-slip characteristics (
It is worth noting that the main seismogenic structure and location of the Songming earthquake that occurred in the Yanglin area have not yet been determined due to the long earthquake occurrence time. This result reveals that the F1 fault has the characteristics of a strong LV anomaly (Figure 12). Previous studies have inferred that the earthquake-generating area of the Songming earthquake is located in the Luliangshan (F1) area (
F11, which is located west of Line 1, is in the Sichuan–Yunnan block and is hidden under the hills and mountains on the southeast edge of the Kunming Basin; the LV (2.6–3 km/s) and lateral velocity change twist, indicating that the area shows obvious torsional compressional characteristics. The fault dip is relatively low and was formed before the Pliocene. Its main active time was the early Pleistocene, and Holocene activity has been weak (
The inversion results in this paper indicate that the main secondary faults of the XJFZ show nearly vertical strike-slip characteristics, and the secondary faults in the Sichuan Yunnan block clamped by the eastern‒western branch show obvious compressional creep slip characteristics. In general, the secondary faults are mainly strike-slip and have compressional characteristics, which conforms to the view that the XJFZ compresses and slides along large-scale strike-slip faults. The velocity structure laterally changes dramatically. The deformation characteristics of the upper crust are brittle, and the deformation mechanism conforms to the rigid block extrusion model.
In recent years, more deep structural features of the XJFZ have been revealed. According to magnetotelluric and seismological studies, two weak material flows may be present in the middle and lower crust, and these flows are considered crustal flows (
In the upper crust, the area held by the eastern and western branches of the XJFZ (especially the inner part of the Songming Basin) has obvious high-velocity anomalies (Figure 12), in addition to the high-velocity characteristics caused by strike-slip compression.
We propose that the XJFZ is comprehensively affected by the upwelling of crustal flow and mantle flow. In this area, because of the influence of weak material flows, some of the molten fluid formed by crust and mantle upwelling along the Xiaojiang fault, which has formed low-resistance and low-velocity characteristics in the middle and lower crust of the XJFZ (
5.2 Basins in the middle segment of the XJFZ
Several basins are located in the study area. Most of the basins have good correspondence with the LV zones. The Yangzong Basin, Kebao Basin, Yiliang Basin and Qixingcun Basin all have LV zones. The interior of the Yiliang Basin shows a high-velocity anomaly. Except that the main boundary of the Laohoujie Basin is not controlled by faults, the genetic mechanism of the basin in the study area is closely related to the regional crustal movement and the characteristics of the Xiaojiang fault activity (
The Yiliang Basin is composed of strike-slip pull-apart double-step areas that are controlled by F4, F5, F7 and F8. F4 and F8 extend into the basin basement from the north, forming the east‒west boundary of the basin. The western area of the basin is a left-stepping extensional zone composed of F4 and F5, while the eastern area is a left-stepping extensional zone composed of F8 and F7. The seismogenic structure of the Yiliang earthquake in 1,500 is considered F5. The velocity in the Yiliang Basin is low over a large scale, the crust is relatively thin, and the fault that cuts through the basement is the main fault controlling geothermal resources in the Yiliang Basin (
The Yangzong Basin is a left-stepping extensional zone composed of F2 and F3, while the Kebao Basin is a trigeminal extensional zone composed of F3 and NW-trending fault F9. The Yangzong Basin shows a strong LV anomaly, which is speculated to be due to the influence of lake water, and it is also possible that the high slip rate in this area leads to a high degree of fragmentation of upper crustal strata (
The shape of the Yiliang Basin is irregular. The dominant faults are F1 on the north side and F2 on the south side. The Songming Basin has a high-velocity anomaly area. Previous studies have considered that the Songming area is an area of uplift (
6 Conclusion
In this paper, based on short-period dense array data and the ambient noise imaging method, the S-wave velocity structure profile of the middle section of the shallow XJFZ is obtained. The results better reveal the velocity structure of the upper crust, the distribution characteristics of the eastern‒western branch subfaults and the basin distribution in this area.
The inversion results show a strong LV zone at each subfault in the middle section of the XJFZ, which can reflect its strike-slip characteristics in the north‒south direction. The faults in each branch have nearly eastward dips. The strong lateral velocity variation characterizes the brittle deformation of the upper crust, indicating that the movement and deformation mechanism of the middle and upper crust conform to the rigid block extrusion model. In addition, the middle section of the XJFZ experienced more severe structural deformation from north to south.
The changes in the fault shape and velocity also represent local compression slip in the large-scale strike-slip process. Especially in the Sichuan–Yunnan block and the east‒west block, the faults and stratum variation are characterized by typical compression.
The fault in the Songming Basin has LV values and extends to deeper areas, which is speculated to be related to the 1833 Songming earthquake.
A comprehensive analysis of basin distribution and deep velocity structure characteristics reveals that during the upwelling process of deep crustal flow, anomalies such as a significant LV, low resistance and strong attenuation in the middle and lower crust were produced, and upwelling along the XJFZ led to the upwelling of high-velocity strata in the upper part of the crustal flow and finally led to the existence of high-velocity anomaly areas.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
The author contributions are as follows, YL contributed to data processing, interpretation and wrinting (original draftpreparation). TX contributed to data processing and result quality assessment. ZL and QL contributed to geological interpretation and revision. XZ and GgW contributed to survey design. GW, SC, and CC contributed to data collecting, format conversion and preprocess. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the Fund from the Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Natural Resources, Grant No. J1901-38, by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant (No.41904096), by the China Geological Survey Project, No. DD20220047 and DD20230008, National key research and development program (No. 2022YFF0800903-1).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Tao Xu (Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for the program support and the comments during the data processing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1161989/full#supplementary-material
References
1
BaJ.XuS.SuC. (2019). Basic characteristics and Genesis of Yiliang geothermal field, Yunnan[J]. Glob. Geol. (in Chin.38 (2), 556–564.
2
BaiD.UnsworthM. J.MejuM. A.MaX.TengJ.KongX.et al (2010). Crustal deformation of the eastern Tibetan plateau revealed by magnetotelluric imaging. Nat. Geosci.3 (5), 358–362. 10.1038/ngeo830
3
Ben-ZionY.VernonF. L.OzakinY.ZigoneD.RossZ. E.MengH.et al (2015). Basic data features and results from a spatially dense seismic array on the San Jacinto fault zone. Geophys. J. Int.202 (1), 370–380. 10.1093/gji/ggv142
4
BensenG.RitzwollerM.BarminM.LevshinA. L.LinF.MoschettiM. P.et al (2007). Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements. Geophys. J. Int.169 (3), 1239–1260. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2007.03374.x
5
CampilloM.RouxP.RomanowiczB. (2014). Seismic imaging and monitoring with ambient noise correlations[J]. Treatise Geophys.1, 256–271.
6
CaoZ.ShenX. (1996). Seismogenic structure of yunnan Yiliang earthquake in 1500[J]. J. Seismol. Res. (in Chinese)19 (2), 184–191.
7
ChangY.ChenL.LiX. (2021). The late quaternary activity of the fault along the Western marginof the Yiliang Basin of the Xiaojiang fault zone[J]. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese)44 (2), 152–161.
8
ChenM.HuangH.YaoH.van der HilstR.NiuF. (2014). Low wave speed zones in the crust beneath SE Tibet revealed by ambient noise adjoint tomography. Geophysical Research Letters41 (2), 334–340. 10.1002/2013gl058476
9
ChunyongW.HaiL.XiliW.QinJ.YangR.ZhaoJ. (2009). Crustal structure in Xiaojiang fault zone and its vicinity. Earthquake Science22 (4), 347–356. 10.1007/s11589-009-0347-0
10
DengQ. (2007). Map of active tectonics in China. Seismological Press. (in Chinese).
11
DengQ.ZhangP.RanY.YangX.MinW.ChuQ.et al (2003). Basic characteristics of active tectonics of China[J]. Science in China Series D Earth Sciences46 (4), 356–372.
12
DuP.WuJ.LiY.WangJ.HanC.LindsayM. D.et al (2020). Imaging karatungk Cu-Ni mine in xinjiang, western China with a passive seismic array. Minerals10 (7), 601–616. 10.3390/min10070601
13
DuY.JingZ.XieF. (2009). The quaternary tectonic stress field of the Kunming Basin and its surrounding areas[J]. Earthquake Research in China (in Chinese)25 (1), 31–40.
14
FangH.YaoH.ZhangH.HuangY. C.van der HilstR. D. (2015). Direct inversion of surface wave dispersion for three-dimensional shallow crustal structure based on ray tracing: Methodology and application. Geophysical Journal International201 (3), 1251–1263. 10.1093/gji/ggv080
15
FuY. V.GaoY.LiA.LiL.ChenA. (2017). Lithospheric structure of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau from Rayleigh wave tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth122 (6), 4631–4644. 10.1002/2016jb013096
16
GaoY.ShiY.WangQ. (2020). Seismic anisotropy in the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau and its deep tectonic significances[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese)63 (3), 802–816.
17
GuoP.HanZ.DongS.MaoZ.HuN.GaoF.et al (2021). Latest Quaternary Active Faulting and Paleoearthquakes on the Southern Segment of the Xiaojiang fault zone, SE Tibetan Plateau[J]. Lithosphere2021 (1), 1–17. 10.2113/2021/7866379
18
KongW.HuangL.YaoR.YangS. (2022). Contemporary kinematics along the Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang fault system: Insights from numerical simulation. Tectonophysics839, 229545. 10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229545
19
LiK.LiJ.MaX. (2020). The Application of Multi-source Remote Sensing Image in the Study of Active Faults - Taking Xiaojiang Fault Zone as an Example[J]. Urban Geology (in Chinese)15 (3), 342–350.
20
LiL.ChenQ.NiuF.HeJ.FuH.et al (2013). Estimates of deep slip rate along the Xiaojiang fault with repeating microearthquake data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese)56 (10), 3373–3384. 10.6038/cjg20131013
21
LiX.BaiD.MaX.ChenY.VarentsovI. M.XueG.et al (2019). Electrical resistivity structure of the Xiaojiang strike-slip fault system (SW China) and its tectonic implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences176, 57–67. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.01.031
22
LiX.RanY.WuF.MaX. Q.et al (2018). Rupture characteristics of late Quaternary strong earthquakes on the Western branch of the Xiaojiang Fault Zone[J]. Seismology and Geology40 (6), 1180–1203. 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2018.06.001
23
LiY.GaoY.ShiY.WuP. (2021a). Preliminary seismic anisotropy in the upper crust of the south segment of Xiaojiang faults and its tectonic implications. Earthquake Science34 (1), 64–76. 10.29382/eqs-2020-0059
24
LiY.HaoM.SongS.ZhuL.CuiD.ZhuangW.et al (2021b). Interseismic fault slip deficit and coupling distributions on the Anninghe-Zemuhe-Daliangshan-Xiaojiang fault zone, southeastern Tibetan Plateau, based on GPS measurements. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences219, 104899. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104899
25
LinF.-C.LiD.ClaytonR. W.HollisD. (2013). High-resolution 3D shallow crustal structure in Long Beach, California: Application of ambient noise tomography on a dense seismic array. Geophysics78 (4), Q45–Q56. 10.1190/geo2012-0453.1
26
MolnarP.TapponnierP. (1975). Cenozoic Tectonics of Asia: Effects of a Continental Collision: Features of recent continental tectonics in Asia can be interpreted as results of the India-Eurasia collision. Science189 (4201), 419–426. 10.1126/science.189.4201.419
27
MordretA.RouxP.BouéP.Ben-ZionY. (2019). Shallow three-dimensional structure of the San Jacinto fault zone revealed from ambient noise imaging with a dense seismic array. Geophysical Journal International216 (2), 896–905. 10.1093/gji/ggy464
28
PeiW.YangZ.ZhouS. (2022). Source Mechanisms of Small Earthquakes and Tectonic Stress Field in Xiaojiang, Yunnan[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis58 (4), 602–608. (in Chinese). 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2022.043
29
QianX.QinJ. (2008). Strong earthquake risk analysis of Xiaojiang Fault Zone and surrounding areas[J]. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese)31 (4), 8.
30
QiaoL.YaoH.LaiY. C.HuangB. S.ZhangP. (2018). Crustal Structure of Southwest China and Northern Vietnam From Ambient Noise Tomography: Implication for the Large-Scale Material Transport Model in SE Tibet. Tectonics37 (5), 1492–1506. 10.1029/2018tc004957
31
SabraK. G.GerstoftP.RouxP.KupermanW. A.FehlerM. C.et al (2005). Extracting time-domain Green's function estimates from ambient seismic noise. Geophysical research letters32 (3), L03310. 10.1029/2004gl021862
32
SchimmelM.PaulssenH. (1997). Noise reduction and detection of weak, coherent signals through phase-weighted stacks. Geophysical Journal International130 (2), 497–505. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1997.tb05664.x
33
SchmandtB.ClaytonR. W. (2013). Analysis of teleseismicPwaves with a 5200-station array in Long Beach, California: Evidence for an abrupt boundary to Inner Borderland rifting. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth118 (10), 5320–5338. 10.1002/jgrb.50370
34
ShapiroN. M.CampilloM.StehlyL.RitzwollerM. H. (2005). High-Resolution Surface-Wave Tomography from Ambient Seismic Noise. Science307 (5715), 1615–1618. 10.1126/science.1108339
35
ShenJ.WangY.SongF. (2003). Characteristics of the active Xiaojiang fault zone in Yunnan, China: a slip boundary for the southeastward escaping Sichuan–Yunnan Block of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences21 (10), 1085–1096. 10.1016/s1367-9120(02)00185-2
36
ShenJ.WangY.SongF. (1998). The evolution stages of the Late Cenozoic tectonic basins in the central part of the Xiaojiang Fault Zone[J]. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese)21 (1), 58–64.
37
ShenJ.YuW. (1997). The NE-trending faults and block structure in the central section of the Xiaojiang Fault Zone[J]. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese)19 (3), 203–210.
38
SongF.WangY.ShenJ.ZhongquanC.ShenX.YuW.et al (1997). The development stages of the basins along the Middle segment of the Xiaojiang fault zone and its relation to regional tectonic movement[J]. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese)19 (3), 211–217.
39
TangW.LiuY.ChenZ.ZhangQ.ZhaoJ.et al (2006). Modern activity in the southern and central parts of the Xiaojiang fault in Yunnan[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology (in Chinese)26 (2), 21–24.
40
TapponnierP.MolnarP. (1977). Active faulting and tectonics in China. Journal of Geophysical Research82 (20), 2905–2930. 10.1029/jb082i020p02905
41
TapponnierP.PeltzerG.DainA.ArmijoR.CobboldP. (1982). Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: New insights from simple experiments with plasticine. Geology10 (12), 611. 10.1130/0091-7613(1982)10<611:petian>2.0.co;2
42
TengD. (1978). Basic characteristics of seismogeology in the middle section of Xiaojiang fault zone in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Seismological Research02, 57–66. (in Chinese).
43
WangE. (1998). Late cenozoic xianshuihe-xiaojiang, red river, and dali fault systems of southwestern sichuan and central yunnan, China. Geological Society of America.
44
WangG.WangE. (2005). Extensional structures within the compressional orogenic belt and its mechanism: a case study for the late Cenozoic deformation in central Yunnan[J]. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese)27 (2), 188–199.
45
XieT.XuT.AiY.ZengQ.ZhangW.ZhengF. (2021). Imaging the shallow crustal velocity structure of the Qingchengzi ore field on the Liaodong Peninsula, China, with a short-period dense array using ambient noise tomography. Tectonophysics813, 228913. 10.1016/j.tecto.2021.228913
46
YangY.HuS.YaoH.FangL.WuJ. (2020). Crustal shear wave velocity and radial anisotropy in the Xiaojiang fault zone system (SE Tibet) revealed by ambient noise interferometry. Tectonophysics, 792, 792, 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228594
47
YaoH.BegheinC.Van Der HilstR. D. (2008). Surface wave array tomography in SE Tibet from ambient seismic noise and two-station analysis - II. Crustal and upper-mantle structure. Geophysical Journal International173 (1), 205–219. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2007.03696.x
48
YaoH.van Der HilstR. D.De HoopM. V. (2006). Surface-wave array tomography in SE Tibet from ambient seismic noise and two-station analysis - I. Phase velocity maps. Geophysical Journal International166 (2), 732–744. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03028.x
49
YuG.XuT.LiuJ.AiY.et al (2020). Late Mesozoic extensional structures and gold mineralization in Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern North China Craton: an inspiration from ambient noise tomography on data from a dense seismic array[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese)63 (5), 1878–1893. 10.6038/cjg2020N0446
50
YuH.HuF.XuJ.ZhangZ.ChenX.et al (2022a). Dynamic Rupture Simulation of the 1833 Songming, Yunnan, China, M 8.0 Earthquake: Effects From Stepover Location and Overlap Distance[J]. Earth and Space Science9 (2), e2021EA002100. 10.1029/2021EA002100
51
YuN.WangX.LiD.WangE.KongW.et al (2022b). The mechanism of deep material transport and seismogenic environment of the Xiaojiang fault system revealed by 3-D magnetotelluric study. Science China Earth Sciences65 (6), 1128–1145. 10.1007/s11430-021-9914-3
52
YuW.ShenX. (1995). Textural research on surface dormation belt of Yiliang earthquake in 1500[J]. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese)18 (4), 408–411.
53
YuW.WangY.SongF. (1996). Survey study on surface rupture zone to Yunnans' Songming M8 earthquake in 1833[J]. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese)19 (4), 385–390.
54
YuW.XieY.ZhangJ. (2004). Age studies of major active faults around Kunming Basin[J]. Journal of Seismological Research (in Chinese)27 (4), 357–362.
55
ZengX.NiS. (2011). Correction to A persistent localized microseismic source near the Kyushu Island, Japan[J]. Geophysical Research Letters38 (16).
56
ZhangP.-Z. (2013). A review on active tectonics and deep crustal processes of the Western Sichuan region, eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Tectonophysics584, 7–22. 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.02.021
57
ZhangS.XieF. (2001). Seismo-tectonic divisions of strong earthquakes with MS≥7.0 and their tectonic geomorphology along Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang fault zone[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese)23 (1), 36–44.
58
ZhangZ.WangJ. (2018). Seismic density around the epicenter of the Songming M8.0 earthquake in 1833[J]. Earthquake Research in China34 (2), 303–311. (in Chinese).
59
ZhaoL.-F.XieX.-B.HeJ.-K.TianX.YaoZ. X. (2013). Crustal flow pattern beneath the Tibetan Plateau constrained by regional Lg-wave Q tomography. Earth and Planetary Science Letters383, 113–122. 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.09.038
60
ZhaoY.GuoL.GuoZ.ChenY. J.ShiL.LiY. (2020). High resolution crustal model of SE Tibet from joint inversion of seismic P-wave travel-times and Bouguer gravity anomalies and its implication for the crustal channel flow. Tectonophysics, 792, 792, 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228580
61
ZhengC.DingZ.SongX. (2016). Joint inversion of surface wave dispersion and receiver functions for crustal and uppermost mantle structure in Southeast Tibetan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese)59 (9), 3223–3236.
62
ZhengF.XuT.AiY.et al (2022). Metallogenic potential of the Wulong goldfield, Liaodong Peninsula, China revealed by high-resolution ambient noise tomography[J]. Ore Geology Reviews142 (2022), 1–13.
63
ZhouY.YueH.ZhouS.FangL.XuL.et al (2022). Microseismicity along Xiaojiang Fault Zone (Southeastern Tibetan Plateau) and the characterization of interseismic fault behavior. Tectonophysics833, 229364. 10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229364
64
ZhuA.ZhangD.JiangC. (2015). Numerical simulation of the segmentation of the stress state of the Anninghe-Zemuhe-Xiaojiang faults[J]. Science China Earth Sciences45, 1839–1852. (in Chinese).
65
ZuoQ.YeT.FengY. (2018). Spatial Database of Serial Suite-Tectonic Map-sheets of Mainland China (1:250, 000)[J]. Geology in China45 (S1), 1–34. (in Chinese).
Summary
Keywords
Xiaojiang fault zone, shear wave velocity structure, ambient noise tomography, songming basin, structural characteristics and evolution
Citation
Liang Y, Xie T, Lu Z, Li Q, Zhang X, Wang G, Wang G, Chen S and Chang C (2023) Shear wave velocity structure in the middle segment of the Xiaojiang fault zone using ambient noise tomography. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1161989. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1161989
Received
09 February 2023
Accepted
06 March 2023
Published
16 March 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Xiaoyu Guo, Sun Yat-sen University, China
Reviewed by
Xuzhang Shen, Sun Yat-sen University, China
Pan Zhang, Jilin University, China
Lun Li, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Liang, Xie, Lu, Li, Zhang, Wang, Wang, Chen and Chang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhanwu Lu, luzhanwu78@163.com
This article was submitted to Solid Earth Geophysics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.